Pro Pundits - Seb
6 September 2021 798 comments
Seb Wassell Seb Wassell
Share:

Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The green arrows of outrageous transfers,
or to take Wildcards against a sea of reds,
and by comparing end them?


Like the Dane himself, we all have a decision to make.

Wildcards are flying, some planned and some as reactions to a tumultuous transfer window.

So, I thought I would take a moment to consider what my current plan is, how that might change and where I want to be in a few Gameweeks’ time in the hope that anyone suffering from similar dilemmas finds good company and perhaps even an alternative perspective.

It’s that or find the ghost of a king to talk to.

CURRENT TEAM

Let’s start with the current team. This is the XV that lined up for me in Gameweek 3:

Fundamentally, there is nothing wrong with this. I have one free transfer and £0.4m in the bank. This does not need Wildcarding for its own sake, but, as with many others, the question of can I Wildcard into an even more advantageous position exists.

Late signings such as Romelu Lukaku (£11.5m) and Cristiano Ronaldo (£12.5m), possible absentees such as Dominic Calvert-Lewin (£8.2m), Callum Wilson (£7.5m) and Raphinha (£6.5m), plus first team opportunities for the likes of Diogo Jota (£7.6m) due to the injured Roberto Firmino (£8.8m) are all relevant and pressing concerns.

As things stand, I am resisting. I am a firm believer that the goal of a Wildcard is to maximise the potential gain between the pre- and post-Wildcard squads, both in the short term and the long term. There is no denying there is an opportunity here, but I do not believe my current team is far behind enough for this to be the optimal moment. I do not consider Ronaldo essential enough to rip up a team for. In fact, I would find it difficult to drop one of the mid-priced forwards for him, such is the value on offer in that bracket currently. Famous last words.

This could change, however. Confirmation that Calvert-Lewin, Wilson and Raphinha, for example, are all out for the coming week could force my hand.

IDEAL GAMEWEEK 7 TEAM

Whatever happens this week, I do have a goal in mind. Whether it be by Wildcard or transfers, the below is how I would like to set myself up from Gameweek 7 based on current information. 

Naturally, the Wildcard will get me closer to this (at least without extra transfers and the associated -4 point cost), but it is mostly possible with transfers too. 

Some compromises may have to be made, such as forgoing the luxury of Josh Brownhill (£4.5m) to Moussa Sissoko (£4.5m) or even opting for Raul Jimenez (£7.4m) in place of one of Michail Antonio (£7.9m) or Calvert-Lewin, but that is acceptable.

Something of an inbetween would be to forgo the Gameweek 4 Wildcard in favour of arriving at my ideal team via a Gameweek 7 Wildcard instead, meaning that between now and then I need only focus on optimising the gains possible via transfers in Gameweeks 4, 5 and 6.

Whilst this was my original intention at the outset of the season, contemplating and writing this article has made me believe I can actually navigate this period without a Wildcard and thus hold it back in reserve for the future.

This is something that could prove a massive advantage when we see a second fixture shift in Gameweek 13 (notably, the conclusion of Chelsea’s favourable run and the beginning of one of the best runs in recent memory for Manchester United). Considering so many will have used their Wildcards by this point, the extra information we will have available and the potential future impacts of COVID developments, this is something that is very attractive to me.

THE WILDCARD

Five-time top 1k FPL finisher Tom Freeman on Calvert-Lewin, Wolves and his Gameweek 2 plans 6

As mentioned, there is however a scenario where I am flipped from an adamant no-Wildcarder into a fully paid-up member of the Gameweek 4 Wildcard crew. A few dominos need to fall for that to happen.

At least two of the following need to look likely:

  • Calvert-Lewin is not fit
  • Wilson is not fit
  • Raphinha is confirmed out
  • Firmino is confirmed out for 2+ weeks
  • New, as of yet unidentified, injuries

If, for example, only Wilson is an issue from the above, I will simply make the move to Jimenez. More than this however would tip the balance of most optimal route in favour of a Gameweek 4 Wildcard for me. This would then present the opportunity to maximise the fixtures between now and Gameweek 7 ahead of arriving at (a slightly modified) ideal team.

The big one here, especially with a Wildcard, is Ronaldo v Lukaku. Their strengths and weaknesses have been discussed plenty over the past few days, so rather than repeat that I want to build on the great work of others and look at a couple of FPL-relevant projections.

PROJECTION 1: RONALDO V BRUNO FERNANDES FPL POINTS

Cristiano Ronaldo's FPL price and position revealed

NOMINATED FOR ‘BEST IN FANTASY FOOTBALL’ AT THE FOOTBALL CONTENT AWARDS 2021

2021 Finalists Announced - Football Content Awards

VOTE FOR FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT BY
CLICKING HERE

798 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. RamaJama
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Who to leave out of the WC?

    A) Raphina
    B) Greenwood
    C) Jota

    1. The Philosopher
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      B if you have Ronaldo/Bruno. C if Firmino is fit. Or else A.

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        nailed it

      2. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Then B

      3. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Hopefully we’ll know at least 1 of the 3 before Saturday…

    2. Bobby Crush
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Tough, as we don't know how United will line up now.

      B or C.

      Probably Jota for me, as he is more likely to start on the bench with Firmino fit.

      1. The Philosopher
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Haven't been in the loop for a couple days now. Is Firmino confirmed fit for GW4?

        1. Bobby Crush
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          Listed here at 75%.
          With such a decent replacement available, I'd say Firmino starts on the bench.

    3. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Ditch all three and go Torres.

      1. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Have him in my WC team

        1. FOO FIGHTER
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          Benny?

          1. RamaJama
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            Torres

            1. FOO FIGHTER
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 1 day ago

              I am asking if you have Benny on your WC?

              1. RamaJama
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 13 Years
                5 years, 1 day ago

                No, Think l’ll ditch him, that Antonio is enough whu from now

            2. dbeck
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 1 day ago

              KDB and Foden are back in training this week and potentially in line to feature this weekend, for those on WC with Torres (he's a good pick btw), i just wonder if you feel adding two more attackers into the squad will impact Torres mins at all?

              1. RamaJama
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 13 Years
                5 years, 1 day ago

                Maby not this week, but ling term yes

                1. dbeck
                  • 8 Years
                  5 years, 1 day ago

                  which is the home vs Soton game, where you would want a starting city attacker

                  1. RamaJama
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 13 Years
                    5 years, 1 day ago

                    Impossible to know who starts

                    1. dbeck
                      • 8 Years
                      5 years, 1 day ago

                      thats sort of my point, is the risk with KDB and Foden back still worth the reward. For my the scales and shifted and i wouldnt get Torres on WC

              2. FOO FIGHTER
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 day ago

                Jesus and Torres have been City's best attacking players.

                KDB is becoming a sick note.

    4. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      This is so hard as I have all 3.

      Maybe Greenwood as we don't know what Ole will do next after CR7.

    5. Fpl Richie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Without clarity on the Brazil situation, Raph is the least enticing. That said, if we knew all were available from here on, GW is the one with the most question marks I suppose.

    6. The Tinkerman
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      B, assuming you have Ronaldo. Jota is pending injury news for Firmino though.

  2. Bobby Crush
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Ings and Barnes to:

    a) Move both, for a hit, to Antonio and Jota. Other suggestions welcome.
    b) Just move Barnes, no hit.
    c) Just move Ings, no hit.

    Also got Vardy as a placeholder for Lukaku.

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A

      1. Bobby Crush
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Thanks.
        Any other suggestions?
        I also consider Torres/Grealish instead of Jota, as I have Salah.

        1. dbeck
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          i think Jota is the best option if Firmino out. With Torries i saw KDB and Foden are back in training so wondering how they will impact Torres mins.
          I also dont hate shopping around the Raphina and Troare price and saving the money for a future move

          Antonio is just good, ticks the team, eye test and stat boxes

          1. Bobby Crush
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            The City question makes sense.Thanks.

            I will certainly get Antonio if he returns unscratched.

    2. Fpl Richie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I think it depends somewhat on priorities.

      For example, Ings is part of my makeweight to get Ronaldo (with Bruno to Jota) and I think whoever replaces Barnes for me, can wait one week.

      1. Bobby Crush
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Yes, but I already have my placeholder up front in Vardy.

    3. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      If you can do Ings to Antonio for free 1st, I would do that.

      1. Bobby Crush
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Cheers!

    4. KunDogan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A

  3. FPL Theorist
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    What is the chance that Veltman starts at wing-back in GW4?

    1. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      High.

  4. AleksaMaster
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Help me to decide between
    1) Salah + White + Marcal
    2) Son + Alonso + James

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      The one with Salah

    2. Bobby Crush
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Salah must have.

    3. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Salaah

    4. Bobby Digital
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      1

    5. Aadii
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Salah

  5. Game of Throw_ins
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Is the "combined" uncertainty of starts for Jota-Torres-Greenwood triplet too much risk? Contemplating 3-5-2 on WC.

    Sa
    TAA - Shaw - Tierney
    Jota - Salah - Greenwood - Torres - Gray
    CR7 - Antonio

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      uncertainty of starts and then not showing your bench is tough, hard to comment further....

      1. Game of Throw_ins
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Oh my bad.. Duffy/Livra and B. Williiams

        1. dbeck
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          i'd downgrade one to strengthen the Gray spot and bench spot to de-risk the impending rotation

    2. Bobby Crush
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Yes, too much.

    3. Aadii
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Given the fixtures run ahead, you might wanna downgrade Shaw to Semedo.

      1. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Or Tierney to Semedo?

      2. Game of Throw_ins
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Shaw to James is in my plans come GW7 and don't wanna double up on Wolves defence yet.

    4. RamaJama
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      An option to downgrade one of them (Grenwood?) to Raphina if not out?

      1. Game of Throw_ins
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Yeah may do that next week if anyone looks like losing his spot. The money I save may help in upgrading def/bench too.

  6. Alisson WondHaaland
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    It would be such classic FPL for Ings to outscore DCL and Bruno to outscore CR7 until GW7

    1. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I'm looking at keeping him. If I use my 2FTs to swap Bruno to Ronaldo, I don't want to take a hit to remove him for DCL. Had a look at his record vs the bigger teams and he has the potential to return.

    2. polis
      • 15 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Almost a given

  7. FOO FIGHTER
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    I do not understand why people are thinking of Arsenal and Wolves assets when they are not winning matches lol.

    1. Qaiss
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Cared to look into the reason why they haven't?

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Both are bottom of the League.

        1. Qaiss
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          Arsenal had injuries/covid problems in the team, whilst playing the two best teams in Europe and Wolves had difficult fixtures too. But sure, you let the herd decide your team for ya 😉

          1. Harry the Hack
            • 17 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            Brentford is rated alot higher than i gave them credit!

    2. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      They aren't going to finish the season with 38 defeats.

    3. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Stay away from those two then. And let people pick what they feel is good for their teams. They will post ten comments here and you still won't be satisfied with their answers. So what's the point?

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        All about opinion, I did not say people should pick assets which are in teams rock bottom of the league.

        It is my opinion even though I do not understand others choices.

        You got that?

        1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          Exactly my point.

          1. FOO FIGHTER
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            Thank you

    4. Pompel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Mostly focussing on their cheap defender options for now though, so makes sense

    5. sully29
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Part of the reason we use underlying stats and look at fixture difficulty is so we're able to base our assessment of a team's future prospects off more than limited results in unfavourable fixtures. It's why we're also not rushing to buy Spurs assets despite them being top of the table.

    6. Well you know, Triffic
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Wolves are a decent bet. Pass the eye test and very good stats. Arsenal are a shambles.

    7. Amartey Partey
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Yeah I don’t get it either. Got Wolves defenders on my radar but not in any rush to bring one in.

  8. YoungPretender
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Best defender 5.2 or below?

    A) Reguilon
    B) Christensen
    C) Semedo
    D) Someone else?

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A

    2. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      B

    3. polis
      • 15 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      (Just becsuse)

      C

    4. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      D

    5. Harry the Hack
      • 17 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Matip

    6. Bobby Digital
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      C

      1. YoungPretender
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Quite the mixed bag of answers

    7. Aadii
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      C

    8. Esalman
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A

    9. Rassi
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      D) Tierney

    10. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Saiss. Goal threat.

    11. Amartey Partey
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A easily. Playing for a team with a solid defence, and defensive manager who likes his full backs to get forward.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        C for upcoming fixtures, and D - Matip, weirdly overlooked nailed defender in a Top 4 side.

  9. FOO FIGHTER
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    If anyone is banking on clean sheet points the I would say Spurs is the best defence to go with.

    1. polis
      • 15 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      From now? Disagree.

    2. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I'm a Spurs fan and we have been really fortunate to keep 3 clean sheets. We've conceded 31 shots in the box and have an xGC of 3.94.

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        That is why you have Lloris, top of the points table.

        Spurs defence would have conceded loads of goals if it was not forLloris and is the reason why Lloris is far ahead of any GK in the game.

        1. TheTinman
          • 11 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          Right, and when Lloris starts making his catalogue of big errors like usual? Then what happens

          1. FOO FIGHTER
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            So the stats are against Lloris?

            1. TheTinman
              • 11 Years
              5 years, 1 day ago

              I didn't mention stats

              1. FOO FIGHTER
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 day ago

                All got to do with stats when Arsenal and Wolves are rock bottom of the League though.

                Ain't it?

    3. SADIO SANÉ
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I'd back Chelsea to beat them for clean sheets all day, and they don't cost that much more

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        +1

    4. WHUFCSmith23
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Why is that? The stats don't look great (ok I get that it's only 3 games in)

      3rd for most shots conceded
      4th for most shots conceded inside the box
      1st for lost tackles

      Man City we can forgive but their other games were against Wolves and Watford. It doesn't read well. Looking at the stats they have been over performing. Its unlikely that can continue, but who really knows.

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        The stats do not look great but Lloris is thumping every other GK with points?

    5. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Haven't watched their games I guess!

      1. Andy_Social
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        I have and that's why I strongly prefer the eye test to going blindly with stats. Spurs have been lucky to win three games and concede nil; Wolves have been unlucky to lose 3 games and concede three. Going forward, I'd have far more confidence in Wolves defenders/keeper than those from Spurs.

        1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          This phone! My comment was supposed to be a reply to Foo. I absolutely agree with you and will recommend Wolves defenders over Spurs any day! Watched their games and Wolves look much more solid. Spurs in fact has been super lucky.

    6. Amartey Partey
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Agreed. They should keep a few clean sheets going forward. Palace, Arsenal, Villa, Newcastle in the next 4 of 5 are good fixtures.

  10. Weeb Kakashi
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    England getting outplayed again. No noise now from Rupert The Horse?

    1. Crunchie
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      What a collapse. Rupert has a very long face at the moment.

    2. TheTinman
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      England are a bunch of bottle jobs unfortunately

    3. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Internationals biggest load of bollocks ever.

      1. No Professionals
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        think someone has misunderstood the post.

      2. Rogue Todd
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Your comment history says hi

  11. DAZZ
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Is Semedo worth the extra 0.4 over Coady?

    1. Pogs
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Nope, Marcal probably better at same price though

    2. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      He is if you are watching the game since Coady is unlikely to even leave his half. If you aren't, then not much in it. Not expecting them to keep CSs.

      Saiss could be better at 5 though

      1. DAZZ
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        What makes Saiss a better option @ 5.0 than Semedo @ 4.9? Semedo is as nailed as Saiss and plays wing back

  12. Pogs
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    What do you think to a power front 3 with good midfield and average defence?
    4.0 Raya
    Thomas Marcal Ayling Reguilon Livi
    Jota Torres Raphina Traore Gray
    Ronaldo Kane Lukaku

    Appreciate any thoughts

    1. polis
      • 15 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      There's an average defence, then a pretty shoddy defence and then yours.

    2. No Professionals
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      if you are going huge up front, why would you not have a 4.5 mid?

      1. No Professionals
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Traore down to a 4.5m allows Thomas to Rudiger or Marcal to Dias.

      2. Pogs
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Because I have chosen Torres and Pep hates me

    3. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      to imbalanced for my tastes, but if you see something with that structure that makes you think you'll get ahead of the pack, then go for it.

    4. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      There are two reasons I personally wouldn't go down this route:

      1. You are locked out of quite a few nailed, penalty taking mid priced forwards.
      2. If one of the premium midfielders really starts banging that's two transfers to get them in.

      1. Pogs
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        All good points, wise and balanced, hope they permeate my current WC team. Appreciated.

    5. Bobby Digital
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I think there's too much value in the midprice bracket up top atm. Antonio DCL Jimenez Bamford Ings could all put up similar figures to your trio.

  13. Steve The Spud
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    We wondered who’d be the first to break from ings Wilson Antonio

    Looks like Wilson takes the prize !

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      whats the latest?

      1. Steve The Spud
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        NUFC 360 on ig saying he could be out for a number of weeks

        1. dbeck
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          good to know, cheers

    2. Deeney-is-a-god
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      have all three, so can count my blessings that it took three whole GWs

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        It was good as long as it lasted

    3. TheTinman
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Wilson is man down.

      Don't expect to find a lot of information though, it's always murky with his muscle injuries. Expected out for 4 weeks, then plays the next, misses the next 2, back for 7 games, out for 4, back for 1, out for 3. And the same story will always be muscle injury out for a few weeks

  14. MartialMatas
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Suggestions?

    Bachmann
    TAA Shaw Veltman
    Salah Fernandes Grealish Raphinha Benrahma
    Bamford Jimenez

    Gunn Ayling Amartey Perica
    1ft 0.6m

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Bruno and Perica to Sissoko and CR7 would be an option for a hit

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        I also think saving is absolutely fine or moving amartey to white and benching a leeds attacker

        1. BeWater
          • 6 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          I was going to say save, captain Salah or Bruno then reassess next week.

  15. Deeney-is-a-god
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    anyone on wildcard tempted to pick de gea? Started the season alright and its his place to loose atm. The run of fixtures is not that scary from a defensive point of view either since United kept most of their clean sheets in the tougher fixtures last season, and I suspect a CS against a tougher team might mean save points and potantial bonus as well for De Gea.

    some uncertainties and certainly a risky pick, but I think he could be a really good pick at that price. With varane in and as the defense settles United could potentially be one of the teams with the most clean sheets this season.

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      for me, its the shaw factor, i would want shaw in my team so then the question goes to do i want a double up? currently i dont, i'd perfer to focus on getting a wolves, city or chels defender and spread the risk a bit.

      1. Deeney-is-a-god
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        I understand that, but a lot of people will do shaw->james in GW 7, so then you would only have a double for the next 3 GWs, which is not the end of the world...

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I would only have Shaw from the UTD defence. He gets bonus points without any returns lol.

      1. Deeney-is-a-god
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        true, but of the keepers at 5.0 and below I believe no one will get more CS this season than De Gea (if he is first choice throughout)

    3. Bobby Digital
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I like AWB or Shaw for 0.5m more

    4. MountainBeach
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      yeah, it's tempting at 5.0. I'd get him in but I already have 3 Utd players.

    5. TheTinman
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      His place to lose, yes, but that just fills me with dread. It's 2-4 bad performances = 1pts per week then he's out and you need to use a transfer. When you could have had about 6 other keepers who are nailed on even if they have a bad run and they'll probably outscore him anyway

      1. TheTinman
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        He also has a recent history of consistent balls ups.

      2. Deeney-is-a-god
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        thats the thing though, I believe there is a decent chance he will be nailed on throughout the season and in which case I do not see anyone in that price bracket outscoring him. I know there is a risk, but I am not overly keen on any of the other keepers in that price bracket.

    6. Emiliano Sala
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I really want him but henderson is close to a return. tough CL matches may end to a rotation ?

      1. Deeney-is-a-god
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        maybe, but I think United want to challenge for the league this season and rotating keepers is not really good for anyone. I think Solskjaer wants to have a nailed on keeper he can trust. Then again that is just a guess and if I pick De Gea I can only blame myself if he is benched.

        1. Andy_Social
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          I'd say Hendo could return any time. I hope it's later rather than sooner as I'm getting a/the United keeper when their fixtures turn GW15 and I'd be very pleased if it's Hendo at a large discount.

  16. Crunchie
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    I cannot see how after the Brazil/Argentina being suspended, and Brazil demanding that English players should be quarantined for 14 days (which is just a ploy to win the game by default as they started the game), that the 5-day penalty by FIFA for clubs not allowing their players to go can't stand?

    If it is indeed a rule that Brazil can quarantine UK nationals for 14 days, (then a 10-day quarantine at Croatia for 10 days totaling 24 days), then a 5-day penalty being imposed by FIFA has to become null and void surely? The clubs were just doing what common sense, in COVID times, and FIFA just now looks plain foolish.

  17. Bobby Digital
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Did Raphinha travel?

    1. Crunchie
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      No, but he should play GW4 now I would have thought.

  18. MountainBeach
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    How's this looking guys? Would really appreciate some help!

    Sanchez,
    Shaw, Rudiger, Dias
    Salah, Greenwood, Benhrama, Raphina
    Ronaldo, Antonio, DCL

    Foster, Gilmour, Livramento, White

    0.5 ITB

    1. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I like it. Solid and reliable back 3. And the front 3 most people would have on WC including me.

      1. MountainBeach
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Thanks for the feedback, man. I guess not having TAA is an issue as most people have told me. Just finding it hard to get him in.

    2. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      decent, no trent is an issue but you know this and you cant have them all

      1. MountainBeach
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        yeah, I know. Just finding it really hard to get him in. Do you think I have to him in at all costs? If so, where do you think I could make the change?

  19. Bury94
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Anyone on a WC going for Lukaku, Ronaldo and Salah? Interested to see your current drafts if so, I'm undecided atm. Got a decent draft it place but it's a bit inflexible

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      i'm very much in the two premium camp, havent seen a decent 3 premium draft to make me think otherwise.....(until you pot yours 😉

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Ronny and Salah and work your way around that.

    3. Dr Van Nostrand
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Leaning towards that in a 4-3-3

      Sanchez Steele
      TAA Christ Reggie Marcal Livro
      Salah Raph Gray Allan Gilmour
      Lukaku CRon Tony

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        replying on steady points from Gray and your 4th defender (and Toney) is going to feel horrible in a few weeks

        1. dbeck
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          *relying

        2. Dr Van Nostrand
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 day ago

          By Tony I meant Antonio.

          Marcal and Gray are gambles but great fixtures and underlying numbers

          1. dbeck
            • 8 Years
            5 years, 1 day ago

            ahh got you, Antonio is a lot better than Toney

      2. Dr Van Nostrand
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Tony=Antonio

    4. Bobby Digital
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Bruunooo babyy!

    5. Harry the Hack
      • 17 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Of the hundreds that have been on the forum, they are basically salah, gray, traore/sarr and benny, maybe one of the 7s if going without TAA

    6. Pinturicchio10
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Nobody has the budget for it. All drafts with the three big guns are fairly shite.

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        This

    7. Khark
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Im on WC and on Ronaldo and Lukaku.

      I've gone with Trent and Jota as a double up over Salah, but im still 50/50 on whether this is right to do or not, so i could easily be back down to a Ronaldo and Salah combo before friday.

    8. Crunchie
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Maybe you should see 10,000 RMTWC's in the last 10 days?

      1. Crunchie
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        It will give you a flavour anyway lol

  20. Iceball
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Sanchez Steele
    TAA Shaw Coufal Ayling Tsimikas
    Salah Bruno Benrahma Raphinha Brownhill
    Antonio Ings Obafemi
    2 ft 3.3 itb
    A) Bruno, Ings, Obafemi out ->Torres, DCL Ronaldo in for a hit
    B) Bruno and Obafemi out, for Ronaldo and Torres, no hit. Play Ings this week and ditch him for free next week
    C) Fix other stuff and WC!
    Have been on B almost for a week, no big injuries still in my team.
    Those in similar shoes, what are you doing?

    1. KunDogan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A

    2. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      A - it sorts a lot of your teams issue in one swoop with. With the Torres spot, how much do you have to spend?

  21. dbeck
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Not on WC but this is what i would go with if I was, roast it...

    Sanchez Gunn
    Trent Rudiger Dias Regi Livra
    Raphina Jota Salah Greenwood Sissoko
    Armstrong Lukaku Antonio

    1. MountainBeach
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I feel like CR is a must have even at his age. At least GW 5 and onwards.

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Greenwood to BennyR gives me the £ to move Lukaku into CR7 if thats your flavor, i dont hate that.

        I just feel its a flexible team with good price points that back the leagues best defenses

    2. Iceball
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Good team there but the problem is you probably already have a good team with no injured player or not performing
      So you dont gain as much as you would when your team later will be in trouble

      1. dbeck
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        yeah i'm not wildcarding this week

    3. OneArseneWenger32
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      don't mind it..good balance

    4. Crunchie
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      It's good, i like the cover for the Greenwood, Jota picks short term

    5. Bobby Crush
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Good team!

  22. FPLtfs
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Hmm, maybe Ings and Wilson -> CR7 and 4.5? Means I’ll have to start Livra though, but keeping Son.

  23. Sillet Bang
    • 16 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Ederson
    Shaw Vvd Taa
    Torres Salah Greenwood Ben
    Antonio Jesus Dcl

    Raya Skipp Duffy Liva

    Not Ona wc and no lukaku or Ronald….. scary times

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Nice team to have...

  24. OneArseneWenger32
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    pickford
    reguilon coufal semedo
    salah jota gray harrison
    antonio ronaldo lukaku

    steele white livramento gilmour

    done.

  25. Time for Traore?
    Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    I believe there is a real misconception about Adama Traore.

    Just listened to PlanetFPL's pod from Sunday and also a few other pods/threads. Most of them dismiss Traore rather quickly as being someone who 'always has good stats' but is a 'terrible finisher'.

    This is not entirely true. He was played PoO very often in the past few seasons mainly at RWB. His expected goals and assists have been very low from the past few seasons. He averaged 1.2 shots/90 the entirety of last season. He was playing very wide and deep, and the only stat that Traore was actually outstanding in is completed dribbles - which he's still top of. His actual FPL related stats last season were NOT good.

    However, this season from those first 3 games, he's been deployed on the left as an inside forward as part of the front 3. His shots/90 have gone all the way up to 4.0. His xG from 0.1/90 > 0.5/90. I could go on. Yes, he has 0g 0a so far. Yes, he's not going to convert chances like Son. However, he also has not underperformed his xG by more than 0.5g in 3 full seasons.

    Point is, his stats from three very difficult opening games vs lei TOT MUN are extremely strong and a big difference compared to last year. His role has been noticeably changed by Lage since he came in for Nuno. If he continues to put up these stats deployed in this position, I firmly believe he will be worth the 6m mid slot.

    Here's a Sky report that highlights his new role under Lage and what it could mean going forward:
    https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12382109/adama-traores-change-of-role-under-bruno-lage-could-define-wolves-season-and-the-spain-internationals-career

    If I was on WC, I would really consider Traore as a cheap but potent differential. I'm also eyeing him as a potential Benrahma replacement if Benny faces competition from Vlasic and his starting spot comes under threat.

    1. dbeck
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Thanks Camzy, he's near the top of my watchlist

    2. sully29
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Agree entirely.

    3. Crunchie
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      It is interesting. I love the way Benrahma and Antonio seems to be telepathic at the moment, but when i downgrade Greenwood, he will be on my radar over Sarr

      1. Crunchie
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        I think Vlasic will be eased in over the European games as a starter and could replace one of Bowen, Benny, or Fornals when he is up to speed.

        Same applies to Areola who i think will replace Fabs soon as he has been poor

    4. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      He's one of those players that gets a label and then everyone notices every time he messes up.

      Unlike a lot of other Spurs fans, I really wanted us to sign him. Would have been interesting to see him playing with Kane and Son.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Yep. There are lots of players that once they get a certain label, no matter what, they can never shake it off.

        'Kyle Walker always has a mistake in him.'
        'Traore has no composure and can't finish.'
        'Lukaku is a flat track bully and can't score against the big teams.'

        And sometimes falsely positive ones:
        'Thiago is world class and would improve any midfield.'
        'Torres is in such great form he can't be dropped. He's the only natural CF at City.'

        1. _Make
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 4 hours ago

          Also, going back, the first few players I can think of who have been labelled negatively include Titus Bramble, Emile Heskey, Marcel Desailly .. I wonder what they all have in common.

          1. Neeskens Under Matip
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            5 years, 4 hours ago

            Silly names?

    5. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Going forward he will be playing more compact defences that wont be as easy to hit on the counter. Do you still
      Think he is worth a go?

      1. Riverside Red
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        Yes

    6. Andy_Social
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I'm more than willing to change my mind, but so far this season, despite the quality of opposition, he's been presented with multiple open goal opportunities and blown them all. Start by putting a couple away, and he'll be my Benrahma replacement. Right now, my eyes are on Mount.

      1. Riverside Red
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        He's set up his colleagues as well numerous times and they have failed to finish .definitely worth a punt with the forthcoming fixtures

    7. Flair
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Fully agree. Eyeing him up as a Benrahma replacement myself.

    8. Dr. Rog
      • 17 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I like him. He is amazing to watch.

      He's like a brain surgeon that uses a sledgehammer rather than a scalpal.

    9. Ruth_NZ
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Excellent stuff.

      On the aspect of Wolves having had tough opening fixtures, sure, that's true. But they may also turn out to have suited Traoré, they were teams that attacked Wolves, which left them more open to fast counters in which Traoré's pace was a big weapon. With the next set of opponents, Wolves are facing more teams that will play conservatively and leave less space behind. So Traoré's numbers from GW1-3 may actually turn out to be be a bit higher than will be the case longer-term.

      On Benrahma, I think the time has already come. He has been lucky to do so well in FPL terms so far (and I say that having had him since GW1) and he only got one game as #10 before being shifted wide, Fornals has been #10 in the last two. Vlasic is a specialist #10 really and will likely make that spot his own in due course.

      But the bigger picture is that the Irons have Europa League this season and it is about to kick in. Last season we were used to a stable and predictable Hammers team, with early exits in both cups meaning the PL was the only game in town for them. This season will be different and there will be rotation, especially in those three attacking midfield positions one would think. In my eyes Benrahma ➡ ? is only a matter of timing it and if I were wildcarding this week he'd be gone.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        It's a fair point. Leicester and United dominated the ball and Wolves' next few opponents are unlikely to do that.

        However, the Spurs game is the one that's interesting. Wolves had 58% possession and bossed the game. Traore put up his best numbers of the season against them.

        4 shots, 3 in the box and an xGI of 0.90. He has 2.12 xGI after 3 games. So a large majority of the xGI he accrued was against the 'defensive' team not the offensive ones on the break.

      2. Geoff
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 5 hours ago

        Completely agree on Benrahma, he's out for me this week.

    10. Baines on Toast...
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Great points - though on WC I think dropping Benrahma before Soton is asking for trouble.

    11. Atimis
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I've limited myself to Traore and Sarr as Barnes replacements

      Sarr (6.0) - overall good fixtures next 3GWs: WOL, Nor, NEW - WOL ofc the toughest one, however, can see a nice potential for counterattacks. The only noticeable of WAT was during the first GW - over 1.3. Sarr with overall xG: 0.43 and xA: 0.62.
      The numbers should be better with the incoming fixtures. Definitely Sarr is their main man, just ofc we can't be sure that WAT will be performing better(?)

      Traore (6.0). - imo the best fixtures next 3GWs: Wat, BRE, Sou. Wolves with good xG of over 1.3 each of their games so far - how it ended is another story. Traore with xG:1.5 and xA: 0.61.
      He passed the eyet-test. Said that, we can't be sure that they will start scoring, however, they look really good as a team.

    12. Atimis
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Can’t really decide between Traore and Sarr, thinking Sarr will have slightly better fixtures, however, although we saw Wolves playing good football,I can’t be sure how Watford will perform. Surely if they score any, it should go through Sarr but…

    13. The 12th Man
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Nope

    14. mazzington☘
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      it's a trap

    15. have you seen cyan
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 19 hours ago

      7 goals, 17 assists across 6 seasons and 8,125 minutes. Thats one attacking return in 338.54 minutes.
      What makes anyone think Traore is gonna be any different this season? Its always the same with Traore and yet people still fall for the same trap, yes he can run, but he cant score and rarely assists.

      Even if he hits a tiny purple patch now, and god forbid he gets two attacking returns on the trot, how long do you think that will last?

      If you pick Traore, you deserve no sympathy when it all goes wrong

      1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 16 Years
        5 years, 19 hours ago

        He’s not actually being picked for the season though - it’s mostly for the next 5 or so

        He’s never going to win any ballon d’ors but if he hits a bit of form to go with the fixtures and starts turning the XGi into actual Gi then he’s grand for a few GW’s

        1. have you seen cyan
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 19 hours ago

          I guess I can see the tempation for five weeks given their fixtures, and yes he could get some points. Just most people getting Traore is on WC, and Traore is dictating their squad structure to some extent, not many 6mil mids to move to other than Sarr.
          When people eventually do drop him, its gonna be for a -4 or 2 FTs

          1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
            • 16 Years
            5 years, 19 hours ago

            Yeah 6m midfielder isn’t exactly stacked like the 8.0 striker shelf… but the cupboard isn’t totally bare either

            In addition to Traore you have Sarr who’s probably on pens now with Deeney gone, ESR who has green fixtures for what looks like the rest of year, Gray who seems to have hit the ground running, and even Mr 150 points himself, FPL favourite Tomas Soucek if all else fails

            Plus if he’s being picked it’s likely to accomodate Salah, CR7, Kaku so it gives the team a certain va-va-voom

            Won’t be for everyone mind you, but I can totally see the case for

            1. have you seen cyan
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 19 hours ago

              ohhh forgot about Soucek, yes he is a pick and a half and will outlast Ben (Soucek is season keeper material imo, excluding terrible fixture patches).
              Sarr isnt bad, dont like any other option tho really.

              I am thinking Jimi, people probably can pick holes with that, but I always liked Jimi, honest work.

      2. harvard
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 19 hours ago

        You clearly do not watch him or did not read the hot topic. They basically stated a whole change in position and style but it doesn't matter because when he was a rwb or rw he had so and so stats (which the stats have drastically changed this season based on the changes)

        1. have you seen cyan
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 18 hours ago

          I read the entire hot post, at first I read only the start but then I was like ok, I will read it all, plus I do watch him play.
          He can probably get some points in the coming weeks sure, I just prefer set my team up with the long run in mind.
          He isnt for me, but I hope he does well for owners and proves me wrong.

          1. harvard
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 18 hours ago

            I perfectly understand preferences. I don't have him, I still have my doubts too but basing his criticism on goals output when his role has been clearly changed to a more goal suited role is unfair.

            Like you said, he could prove backers or doubters wrong either way

    16. Bennerman
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 19 hours ago

      It's not really the case to claim he's suddenly playing a different position, surely? Played as a forward loads of times under Nuno, was definitely not purely a wing-back.
      Whatever else might be true and worthwhile in this assessment (which may well be plenty), I can't buy the idea he's been punted up front apropos of nothing. He's always been an attacker, albeit one - granted - used as a wing-back by Nuno plenty of times.

    17. Splatter\\\'s Omerta
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      4 years, 12 months ago

      Traore is a complete trap. Looks amazing, no-one would want to play against him, but I do not see him as a high scoring FPL asset.

    18. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
      • 16 Years
      4 years, 12 months ago

      No

      No it's not time for Traore

  26. Tabbara
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Thoughts on
    Mahrez, Fernandes and Ings out for Ronaldo, Gray/Sarr and Son (-4)

    1. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Good moves

    2. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I would probably do that with Sarr over Gray.

    3. Splatter\\\'s Omerta
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      4 years, 12 months ago

      Son injury concern...

  27. southernrocker1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Had a sudden rush of blood and hit the WC button despite having a good start and being reasonably happy with my team. No turning back now and Ronny is up front.

    My final dilemma is to go for Lukaku as well (also have Salah) but it would mean TAA drops to a £4.5. Is going without him madness or a risk worth taking?

    ie:
    A TAA & Calvert-Lewin
    B £4.5m & Lukaku

    I know Luk's fixtures aren't great apart from Villa but an early WC means inevitable panic otherwise, in 3 weeks.

    Thoughts appreciated!

    1. grumpyman
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Lukaku is flagged and now an injury concern for this GW, so that should make your decision easier!

    2. Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      It's a simple calculation, does Lukaku outperform DCL by more points than TAA outscores a 4.5?

      The answer is no, and balance is the winner, yet again.

    3. OneArseneWenger32
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      it's a risk with taa for sure but no risk no reward...change the 4.5 based on matchups every few weeks and should be good to go..dcl might be consistent scorer but is he likely to haul? i think being on penalties does help him this year for sure..on the other side some might prefer having lukaku who might be good for a hattrick or two this year

  28. Harry the Hack
    • 17 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Is there a mute button in these forums that let you block seeing comments from particular users? Can't find one here

    1. ElChapo
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      would be a blessing

    2. Flair
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      No. One of the reasons I reduced my involvement on here.

    3. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      good idea that

    4. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 19 hours ago

      That would be something indeed.

  29. YoungPretender
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    I have 9.6 to spend on 2 defenders, I have a few combinations in mind;

    Reguilon & White
    Christensen & Coady
    Tierney & Dier

    Any thoughts?

    1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 19 hours ago

      All nice combos. What about tierney and Coady … as long as you have a playing 4m on you bench as cover (Williams) …

  30. squ1rrel
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 day ago

    Best 6.2 mid or under on WC? Don't want to double up on West Ham and Everton so staying away from Fornals and Gray. Considering Sarr, Trincao, Traore at the moment

    1. BeWater
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Sarr would be my first choice with Traore second.

    2. sully29
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      I'd go with Traore based on the underlying stats and long run of good fixtures.

      The question mark for me is whether those underlying stats will hold against teams they'll have less opportunity to counter attack. But for 6m you're not getting perfect picks.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 day ago

        If you don't have Raphinha, Harrison should be considered.

    3. ElChapo
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      Have a look at Smith Rowe - nailed, great fixtures, easily arsenal's best attacking player to far, saves some money also.

    4. Bruno Commando
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 day ago

      how about gray?

    5. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 19 hours ago

      On a WC just go for Traore … you need a punt on a WC and at 6m with those fixtures and the potential and threat bubbling, will add some excitement to your wildcard.