Scoreboard
11 March 2023 531 comments
Skonto Rigga Skonto Rigga
Share:

The Scoreboard presents all the Fantasy Premier League (FPL) numbers from Saturday’s matches on one screen.

As well as LiveFPL‘s rundown of the goals, assists and bonus points from the day’s FPL action, we’re bringing you a selection of the Opta stats that arrive in our Premium Members Area almost immediately after full-time in each fixture.

The usual Scout Notes articles will follow this piece.

SATURDAY’S GOALS, ASSISTS AND BONUS

PLAYER AND TEAM STATS

TEAMS – GOAL ATTEMPTS
TEAMS – EXPECTED GOALS (XG)
PLAYERS – GOAL ATTEMPTS (TOT)

MORE STATS IN OUR MATCH CENTRE

For other stats, shot maps, heat maps and more, click on the result of each fixture below to go through to the Match Centre:

Crystal Palace0 – 1Manchester City
Tottenham Hotspur3 – 1Nottingham Forest
Leicester City1 – 3Chelsea
Leeds United2 – 2Brighton and Hove Albion
Everton1 – 0Brentford
Bournemouth1 – 0Liverpool



531 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. OLB
    • 10 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Just switched MOTD over to a movie. First time I’ve ever done that. How bad is that tonight.

    1. Halftime Lemon
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I liked it with no commentary, like watching from the stands.

      1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Just need a cold draft and a just about warm enough pie

      2. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        There was that time – think it was the World Cup, maybe, or some time? – when there was the option to kill the commentary.

        Definitely my preferred option.

        I turn the sound down, generally, but would love to still hear the crowd sounds while just watching the game.

        1. Halftime Lemon
          • 16 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Yes crowd sound far more important than commentary. Covid era games were dire

          1. Bennerman
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            No commentary should become an option. I thought it naturally would. Actually, maybe it is but I don't fully understand the remote!

  2. Connor's Calling
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    WC time. Prob should have done this GW given the Salah 0 and Mac Allister goal but there we go. Anyway, where am I going wrong below (please). Not seeing it well this year!!

    GW28 WC (11 starters):
    Ward (bha)
    Chilwell (EVE), Botman (nfo), Trippier (nfo), Zinchenko (CRY)
    Odegaard (CRY), Saka (CRY), Maddison (bha)
    Watkins (BOU), Toney (LEI), Kane (sou)
    Bench: Steele, Shaw, Rashford, Mitoma

    GW29 BB: Above team + Odegaard -> Mac Allister. 12 doublers + Saka, Zinchenko, Kane

    GW30: Enough cash for Watkins -> Haaland

    1. KDB United
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I’m in the exact same situation (stuck with pool players and regretting not WC 27) and this plan is looking very good.

      Should have the edge on WC 26/27 people for 28/29 and have a healthier team going forward (not full of brentford and Brighton for the future).

      I can have Haaland instead of Watkins (I know he blanks and doesn’t double) as I don’t want to drop .4 on him. You think it’s worth the .4 drop?

  3. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
    • 14 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    They are into something here on MOTD … would like the commentary during match but permanently get rid of the bollox in studio crap I skip on IPlayer normally. Short and to the point. Get to see what I want without the waffle.

    1. marcus2704
      • 15 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah, have commentary, and extend the highlights from the additional time gained by getting rid of the studio nonsense.

      1. OLB
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Agree +1

      2. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Exactly this.

  4. Count of Monte Hristo
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Better double up?

    Shaw + Martinez

    Trippier + Schar/Botman

    1. Connor's Calling
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Prob B, just.

      Can’t you get Shaw, Trip, Bot?

      1. Count of Monte Hristo
        • 12 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah on wildcard so I can have any combination.

        Shaw + Trippier in already. You prefer Botman over Schar?

        1. Connor's Calling
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Cheaper so why not - cash can always be used elsewhere. On WC as well and that’s the combo I’m on

    2. Hy liverpool
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Schar.

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Newcastle double defence. I wouldn't want a 2nd United defender blocking Rashford/Bruno

  5. Shultan
    • 10 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    They should've just cancelled MOTD

    1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Why .. I wanted to see the goals/highlights?

      1. jonnybhoy
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Surely just watch on youtube? Thats all they are showing 3min clips?

        1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          One stop shop … but YouTube is a good shout

        2. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Maybe the good that comes out of this is that the cancel the TV licence … only thing I watch on BBC is MOTD

          1. Bennerman
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            Genius at work.

            Jesus wept.

            1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
              • 14 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              You’re happy being forced to pay for the BBC?

              1. Bennerman
                • 7 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                I'm happy to pay my share for public service broadcasting that is of benefit for all. Absolutely I am.

                Same principle as the NHS, and taxes in general.

                1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 1 month ago

                  Big difference my opinion … BBC is hardly a public service the way the NHS is … crazy comparison my friend.

                  1. Bennerman
                    • 7 Years
                    3 years, 1 month ago

                    The principle is, we all pay into the pot as a collective, as a society – same for both.

                    One rather large point for you to consider:

                    You don't have to buy a licence, you're not being forced to, as you put it.

                    1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                      • 14 Years
                      3 years, 1 month ago

                      If you have any device in your home that is capable of showing live tv then you are legally required to purchase a tv licence … out dated and wrong.

                      1. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Not true.

                  2. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                    • 14 Years
                    3 years, 1 month ago

                    We CHOOSE top pay for Netflix, Amazon etc etc … but we legally have to pay for BBC … outdated … would rather they treated same as every other broadcasting service … pay for it if you want it, if not, block it and don’t pay if your happy to go without. £150 a year forced on people for TV and radio and they aren’t free to choose if they want it or not.

                    1. Bennerman
                      • 7 Years
                      3 years, 1 month ago

                      You only have to pay if you use it.

                      Same as Netflix etc.

                      Please get the very basics in place if you want to discuss it with any credibility.

                      1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Incorrect. If you have any device in your home that is capable of showing live tv, you are legally required to have a tv licence. It’s ridiculous but there you have it.

                      2. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        To be fair, this is now ringing a bell.

                      3. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        No, stick to my guns, it's as I thought. You are wrong:

                        What is live TV and when do I need a licence for it?

                        Live TV means any programme you watch or record as it’s being shown on TV or live on any online TV service. It’s not just live events like sport, news and music. It covers all programmes on any channel, including soaps, series, documentaries and even movies.

                        If you’re watching live TV, you need to be covered by a TV Licence:

                        if you’re watching on TV or on an online TV service
                        for all channels, not just the BBC
                        if you record a programme and watch it later
                        if you watch a programme on a delay
                        to watch or record repeats
                        to watch or record programmes on +1, +2 and +24 channels
                        to watch live programmes on Red Button services
                        even if you already pay for cable, satellite or other TV services

                      4. Sheffield Wednesday
                        • 5 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        In the UK
                        "To watch any live recording or broadcast, regardless of the country or language of origin, one needs a TV licence.
                        Additionally, a licence is also needed to watch any programmes on BBC or the on-demand service BBC iPlayer.
                        Despite the name, the TV licence covers a range of devices that are not necessarily televisions, such as gaming consoles, laptops and mobile devices.
                        This means regardless of the device, channel or platform, watching any form of live content needs a licence."

                      5. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Watching.

                        Not owning, as Columbo has spuriously claimed.

                      6. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Thanks, so the BBC don’t take any money from the TV licence … happy to be corrected here … certainly not arrogant enough to be corrected?

                      7. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        The money goes on the ouput!

                        That's the whole point, that's how it is funded.

                        We all pay (well those of us who watch). With the money we pay in, they make TV/radio etc that we watch and listen to.

                        Page one.

                      8. Robe Wan
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 13 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        It’s a flat tax structure though.
                        It makes no allowance for means or the amount watched which is totally unjust. The opposite of social benefit

                      9. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        The licence fee accounted for 71% of BBC funding in 2021/22
                        Total BBC income in 2021/22 was £5.33 billion, 71% of which came from the licence fee revenues. The remaining 29% or £1.53 billion came from commercial and other activities (such as grants, royalties and rental income).

                      10. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Maybe so. But the principle itself stands up.

                        Means-tested would be one possible development.

                      11. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        You didn't even now how the very basics worked a minute ago mate, you don't have much of a leg to stand on here.

                      12. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Don’t think the % of the TV licence money BBC takes matches their output .. why do they get such a large piece of the pie.

                      13. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Sorry, I can't continue this discussion with you.

                      14. Robe Wan
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 13 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        The principle is just an idea. It’s being terribly executed.

                      15. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        You didn’t even know either … and there is nothing wrong with that, but you checked yourself which is fine … crazy concept here but when someone checks your view, your big enough to check it yourself and challenge yourself … might find you were right in the first place … but to assume your right no matter what is a sad state of affairs, being big enough to at least question yourself makes the world a better place .. so I assumed hey, maybe this guys right and I’m wrong … so shock, I had a little look to educate my self. Surely you don’t think someone should be nailed to spot and not allowed to think on it a bit?

                      16. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Classic. Someone doesn’t agree with you, so you shut down. So much for freedom of opinions.

                      17. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        I did know. I told you all about it. I had a moment of self-doubt, as is pretty normal during such a contretemps. But indeed, I was correct. You were utterly wrong, and you shouted pretty loudly about that wrong. It's all on you, I'm afraid.

                        Well done for checking it out and moving forward, yes I always think that is a good thing and applaud it.

                      18. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        It’s not a competition lol … it’s a difference of opinion … you know, the things were allowed to have last time I checked. You think BBC getting 71% of TV licence money is a good/fair thing, personally, I don’t … but hey … thankfully we don’t all have to agree with one another.

                      19. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Er... who do you think should get the licence money?

                      20. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Not the BBC, certainly not 71% of it. Perhaps redistribution in to social care, NHS something like that.

                      21. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Right... not sure you have grasped the basic model here.

                      22. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Point is, I disagree with the current model.

                      23. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        There I go again, having my own opinion.

                      24. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Or maybe use the money to get the internet available to all homes in the UK … something useful

                      25. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        That's not the BBC's remit. You're really mixed up here, mate, you seem to be conflating a number of things.

                      26. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                        • 14 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        Oh dear. Accept that not everyone is aligned with your views on everything and be at peace with it. I’m happy your happy.

                      27. Hect.OR 98th
                        • 16 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        You've been all over the place on this one. Started off stating something that wasn't true, that was pointed out and you've changed the basis of your argument rather than acknowledge you were wrong. You've had a mare.

                      28. Bennerman
                        • 7 Years
                        3 years, 1 month ago

                        I was trying to be polite about it.

                    2. Baps Hunter
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 8 Years
                      3 years, 1 month ago

                      BBC is free here, but commercials is the cost. And MOTD is not shown 🙁

          2. Halftime Lemon
            • 16 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            Wild idea but if we all stopped paying for sport tv subscriptions, would coverage come back for free, funded by ads, players paid more sensible wages
            #canwehaveourfootballback

            1. George Sillett
              • 10 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              No . The immediate impact would be bankruptcy for many clubs with streaming unaffected

              1. Halftime Lemon
                • 16 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                As long as millions of fans pay £££ to watch from home nothing wl change I guess. Not just football, NFL, cricket etc etc

            2. Bennerman
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              I like you, Che Guevara.

              But they've gone too far, can't be undone and not enough will among the masses who have been pacified by 'religion, sex and TV' to quote `John Lennon.

              1. Bennerman
                • 7 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                Saying that, Che – as do I – would puke in his pocket at 'funded by ads'

              2. Halftime Lemon
                • 16 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                Very true. There must be way to break the cycle but no way to achieve it

                1. Bennerman
                  • 7 Years
                  3 years, 1 month ago

                  Would take a sea change – I'm up for doing my part but nowadays I have very little faith in my fellow man. I'm afraid.

    2. Flog the trog
      • 15 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      What? Why? It's so much better without all the tripe these so called experts spurt out

      1. Marvin.
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Down with experts!

      2. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Same as round here!

      3. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        On that I agree. Would like commentary during the matches but just do away with the studio crap. Should take the opportunity to improve the programme. Extend highlights and do away with the pundits in between the matches …. Personal preference but the guff from the studio is not required.

    3. Scalper
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Anyone just watch YouTube? Lol everything is on there. Haven’t watched cable television or paid subscription for years

      1. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yep, loads of people – from your generation probably, without wanting to pre-judge your generation.

        In the industry, they call those who used to use terrestrial TV but now have migrated to YouTube/Netflix etc 'cord-cutters'.

        And those who never even had terrestrial TV in the first place, 'no corders'.

        I'm a bit older than probably many on here, so I'm used to 'TV' as we used to know it.

        1. George Sillett
          • 10 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Me too until I discovered jail breaking a firestick.

    4. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Why are England and Wales games free on terrestial, but Scotland isn't? I thought we were still one nation.

      Btw. I love MOTD. That Saturday night feeling, regardless of FPL.

      1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        A certain, soon to be leaving, horror has been doing her best to end that, but thankfully we still are!

      2. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I hesitate to get into the concept of devolution, with the number of fine minds on here to... have no idea

        1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Well, I guess ultimately, it’s personal opinion again.

          1. Bennerman
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            Devolution is a factual state of affairs, not an opinion.

            Blimey.

            1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
              • 14 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              But someone’s opinion on whether is a good thing or a bad thing is not factual.

              1. Bennerman
                • 7 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                I agree, yeah, of course.

                But devolution is a thing. In answer to Buzzbomb's post about one nation etc.

                Were never talking about matters of opinon.

                1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 1 month ago

                  Well devolution still means we’re one nation … independence means we’re not which is something quite different but that’s a whole different can of worms and I don’t like eating worms, certainly not this late at night.

        2. BUZZBOMB ♡
          • 11 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          When I plug in my 5 prong plug telly and Craig and Charlie Reid are standing proud at Eurovision singing some song about Cairngorm National Park accommodating refugees at a cost of 100m smakaroonies... I'll be happy

      3. Baps Hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Scotland is going to join EU said Nicola...

    5. Halftime Lemon
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Vanessa Feltz is doing it next week

      1. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Fat Welsh Guy from Go Compare advert wearing a betting sponsored Tshirt is doing it to the opening tune of Jess Glynn's Hold my hand or On the Beach's Most Wonderful Time of the Year.

  6. Magic Zico
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    😆 MOTD - worst than Covid's turmoil?

  7. Count of Monte Hristo
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Raya or Neto for DGW29?

  8. Goodfeathers
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Pretty disgraceful they didn’t source any commentary for MOTD. Fine for those of us with decent eye sight, but a lot of people aren’t so lucky and the commentary is very important.

    1. Ruminating Llama
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Nobody would do it out of solidarity, that's the point.

      1. Goodfeathers
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I get that, but they should have just pulled it completely if they aren’t going to cater for everyone..

        1. Bennerman
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Think not pulling it completely was a last act of what they thought was defiance, in fact looks utterly feeble.

      2. BUZZBOMB ♡
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        FPL Virgin would have. OMG...Billing...

    2. BeaversWithAttitude
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      True. Meaningless coverage if you have visual impairment. Personally, I was hoping for a bit of commentary on the Leeds v Brighton match, particularly on the controversial own goal.

      1. Halftime Lemon
        • 16 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Was radio coverage affected eg R5 Live?

        1. Bennerman
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          I had it on. They didn't seem to have a studio base – I believe Mark Chapman put himself out of the equation – but they kind of winged through all from the main commentator. Felt a bit for him

          1. Halftime Lemon
            • 16 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            TalkSpors did a whole secrion on. Immigration and asylum.Fair play to them, probably lost listeners but more thought provoking than. Silent highlights

            1. Bennerman
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              Really? I'm surprised by that.

              1. Halftime Lemon
                • 16 Years
                3 years, 1 month ago

                Think Henry Winter called it 'brave broadcasting' on twitter

  9. Ruinenlust
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    What are Salah owners doing? Keeping for the double or selling to free up cash?

    1. OLB
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I’m keeping for double. Then maybe sell.

      1. Halftime Lemon
        • 16 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        He was awful today, I'd get rid

  10. Boss Hogg
    • 16 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Before I go to bed, anyone care to join me in a final chant for the day of F*** the Tories?

    F*** the Tories
    Do do do do
    F*** the Tories
    Do do do do

    1. Bennerman
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Lustily so.

    2. Goodfeathers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Already part of my daily mantra

    3. Marvin.
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      To be fair it isn't even really a tory party anymore. It's just ukip in disguise.

    4. DBW - Slug's Mortgage …
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      18 month countdown.

      If Labour can’t beat these lot we are doomed.

      1. Hairy Potter
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Never overestimate the British electorate.

        1. Bennerman
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Absolutely don't. Last 10 years... horrendous.

      2. George Sillett
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Still waiting for concrete evidence to endorse your lies. Oh wait there isn't any ......

    5. Ruinenlust
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Childish

      1. Marvin.
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Perhaps. But the sentiment is entirely warranted.

        1. Ruinenlust
          • 8 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Until you grow up and get a job

          1. Bennerman
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            Tory alert

          2. Marvin.
            • 9 Years
            3 years, 1 month ago

            Well you sure showed me.

            1. Bennerman
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 1 month ago

              What an extremity of a ringing device used in church towers, eh?

    6. Flog the trog
      • 15 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Nah mate,. I'm a grown up man, not a 14 year old girl. Grow tf up

    7. Scalper
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      This is stuff you see at the family dinner table when ur extended family visits for Xmas

      1. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah, when that tool cousin turns up

      2. George Sillett
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        And why understandably you only meet up once a year

  11. Hairy Potter
    • 10 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    BBC has a week to sort this out or is it going to be live FA Cup matches without any host or commentary?

    1. George Sillett
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Nope . Other alternatives available for viewing

    2. Halftime Lemon
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      They'll fiind some ambitious scab to fill in. Jenas?

      1. George Sillett
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Or even worse resort to Logan

      2. Vinyl78LP
        • 16 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Alan Partridge available, with Ron Manager for added punditry ?

  12. Steve The Spud
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    I’ll happily do the commentary if they pay me a few quid

    Couldn’t care less about Gary and his big ears

    1. Sid1891
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Of course you couldn’t because I assume your travel via cruise ship not dinghy

  13. Steve The Spud
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    If walkers need someone to eat a packet of prawn cocktail on tv for a couple of mil a year I’ll do that as well

    1. Boss Hogg
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      You spelled scab wrong, Steve.

      1. Flog the trog
        • 15 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I know quite a few big eared hypocrites we could call up, they aren't in short supply!!

        1. Marvin.
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Who do you believe is being hypocritical?

  14. gart888
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    So are people really going Haaland to Watkins now? It seems so draft, but 3 fixtures in the next 2 GW instead of 1 (at Anfield) is so hard to ignore.

    1. g40steve
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Watkins, Havertz, Felix all have several extra games?

      1. gart888
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Sure, I'd do Havertz instead if Watkins is hurt. But still seems crazy to sell Haaland.

    2. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      City play Liverpool at the Etihad

  15. g40steve
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    2FT?

    Royale > Chilwell?

    Anything else?

    Raya,
    Mee, Trippier, Zinch
    Saka, Ode, Maddison,
    Kane, Toney,

    Sanchez, Rashford, Purvis, Mitoma, Haaland Royale

    1.2

  16. Stimps
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Worth it a hit to field 11?

    Haaland, TAA -> Watkins, Chillwell

    Plan to get Haaland back in GW30

  17. Stranger Mings
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Haaland to Watkins looks straightforward?

      1. Stranger Mings
        • 5 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Oh on thanks for the heads up - will wait for further news

    1. Halftime Lemon
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I heard a villa fan say Kamara injury will have an impact, makes them tick

  18. Flying Dutchman
    • 15 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    25k overall ranking.
    My highest ever. Feels good!

    1. LeytonOrient
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Don’t get a nosebleed!

    2. gart888
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Well done. Still have 2 of your chips?

      1. Flying Dutchman
        • 15 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Tc, bb, fh

  19. Shark Team
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    If you sell Haaland now is there possibility of not getting back till 33?
    30: Rashford vs EVE(h) can be captained over Haaland vs SOU(A)
    31: Possible New and Bha DGW
    32: blank

    1. Stranger Mings
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I have planned to get back GW30

      1. Shark Team
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yes is it worth though if you aren't captaining? Although I believe he scores easily in every game ,even vs Liverpool

        1. Flying Dutchman
          • 15 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          It’s too risky if you don’t have him, will be a rank killer

        2. Stranger Mings
          • 5 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Yes as I will probably sell Watkins or havertz for him

  20. Aksekladden
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Free hit this week is gonne be a pickle. Looking at this lot, but benching is a gamle..

    Kepa - Sa
    Chilwel - Cash - Kilman - Zinc - Tripps
    Marti - Saka - Son - Maddi - Almiron
    Watkins - Kane - Havertz
    1.3itb

    RMT

    1. LeytonOrient
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Bench Kilman Almiron Cash

      Son would be a great differential if he did the business. But he has been so so poor all season, risky.

      1. Aksekladden
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Ty.
        Agree, great differntial. Good game today.

  21. Ruinenlust
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    For double:
    Salah or Bruno?

    1. Messiah Hazard
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Salah

    2. Shark Team
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Bruno

  22. Shark Team
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Which one gives me more pts in your opinion?
    A) Gabriel (CRY+LEE), Botman (bre)
    B) Shaw (new + BRE + EVE) -4pts

    1. SKENG
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I'd choose B for the attacking threat, but A might be more reasonable.

      1. Shark Team
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks mate, think I'll risk B hoping for a Shaw assist

    2. LeytonOrient
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I reckon both options get you 2 CS. Shaw more of the attack threat. Would be close but I would prefer Shaw and have my arsenal spot elsewhere. Plus might mean avoiding a double up on the toon if you have tripps and they don’t pick up.

      1. Shark Team
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yes, I can't time Arsenal's cs this season. Shaw at LB is very involved so lets hope he gets something

  23. LeytonOrient
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Fofana seems great value at 4.3 for a route into Chelsea DEF. I’m 0.4 short of James/Chillwell.

    Is he nailed?
    Or is TSilva due back soon or Badiashile coming in hot?

    1. Shark Team
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Yes he is 100% nailed till injured imo. He is the only one who can play RCB in 3 atb, Azpi is so old

      1. LeytonOrient
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I am agree.
        But I’m not seeing any mention of him here.
        Chelsea have a reasonable run.

        1. Shark Team
          • 8 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Bec most dont have money issues and going for Chilwell, or already owning loads of Bre/Bha defs for 29

      2. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yes – I had grand plans to bring him in in September or whenever it was, when he got the injury!

        Defo got my eye on him now, seems to be standing up okay so far to coming back fro injury and playing loads.

    2. SKENG
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Personally I wouldn't go there, Badiashile too much of a threat. Would only consider Chilwell and Koulibaly.

      1. Ruinenlust
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Fofana and Badiashile don’t even play in the same position LOL

    3. Ruinenlust
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      He is their best CB

    4. Halftime Lemon
      • 16 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      His appeal is based too much on 1 good week. Recency bias

  24. SKENG
    • 10 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    1 FT, a lot ITB

    Raya
    Trippier Botman Chilwell Henry
    Saka Maddison
    Kane Toney Havertz

    DDG Rashford Mac Allister March Estupinan

    Would you roll here and play 10 or use the FT? I am BBing in 29 so it would have to be someone who plays 28 and doubles 29.

    Thanks!

    1. Shark Team
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Roll, not a single one I would want to lose for 29 who blanks in 28

      1. SKENG
        • 10 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah looks like roll. Was looking at Estupinan > Schar/Burn but not sure I like that.

        1. Shark Team
          • 8 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          No, Forest will score at home as they usually do. Joelinton also out is an important miss imo. If Brennan is out injured then New may keep cleanie but anyways their 29 double isnt better than Estu's and its not even close

    2. LeytonOrient
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      In great shape. I think I will go with 10 also, short term pain.

  25. Sheffield Wednesday
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    How well did Chilwell perform - any fitness concerns?

    1. Disco Stu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Chilly looked just fine today. Got forward quite a bit

      1. Halftime Lemon
        • 16 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Looking so handsome at 3rd sub for me. Hate this game

  26. Disco Stu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Would you bring in Chillwell for Estupinan in 28 to have 11 players playing? Chilly also has a DGW in 29

    1. Sheffield Wednesday
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Thinking similarly - have exact money for this and another transfer.

      1. Disco Stu
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I like Estupinan's DGW better but getting an extra game from Chilly should equal that out and I'll have enough to do Odegaard to Madison to give me 11 DGWers in 29

        1. Sheffield Wednesday
          • 5 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          After returning from Australia I don't expect Pervis to play both DGW29 fixtures.

    2. gart888
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Interesting idea. I kind of had it in my mind that I needed to do Haaland to a forward, but that would work too.

      I don't hate it!

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 5 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I know it makes sense to temporarily replace Haaland but it's so costly to get him back later.

        1. gart888
          • 11 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Yup that's my dilemma too. But on the other hand after this week there are only 11 more game weeks. We can't take that team value with us to next season. Points matter more.

    3. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Can everyone stop bringing Chilwell in on day 1 of a DGW - I have exact funds for him but don't want to bring in tonight! 😀

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 5 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        I wouldn't be discussing this now had it not been for FPLstatistics and their damned predictions! 😉

        1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          How much do you think the potential rises are being affected by potential WCs this game week … I can’t remember if it’s just FH that don’t impact or if WCs too?

        2. Sun Jihai
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Ha, tbf I guess James is the same price and was only out due to illness so a decent alternative if I'm priced out ... also on pens

  27. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Thoughts on solanke as haaland replacement??

    Great fixtures. Means by gw30 I can gave haaland, bruno kane saka and 2 Brighton mids plus Chilwell and trippier rashford etc

    Getting watkins or havertz means more hits....thanks

  28. Chemical76
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Who knew that FPL site holds xG stats?

    1. Bennerman
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I know.

      Funny how you haven't heard that mentioned here...

      1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah, just everything else political ….

        1. Lieutenant Frank Columbo
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Sorry bennerman… wrong post!

  29. camarozz
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Feeling smug with 39 pts ,two points more than my early gw26 wc ..in no way makes you for the lost points last wk ...

    1. camarozz
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Makes up*

    2. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      42 here. Already more than last week with 9 to go.
      Salah missing that pen today was sweet.

      1. Bennerman
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Conversely, all my lucky Liverpool gains leaking away this week. This game!

      2. camarozz
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah it was perfect, rivals had taa/gakpo and Darwin still.

        1. Bennerman
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 1 month ago

          Think there are a few of you who are caning me, damn.

  30. LeytonOrient
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Life is good. GW 29 has just ended. Haaland hat trick vs pool, 4-0 Arsenal win over Leeds, Kane score 6 goals against Everton and Brighton & Brentford secure their second 1-1 draws of the GW. Life is good.

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      The way this season is going, Tarkowski will get the six goals, Jesus will score all 4 in that Arsenal win (no assisters) and all Haaland's goals will be rebounds from missed penalties

      1. LeytonOrient
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        The beautiful game eh