330 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Sho-kun
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Is Watkins --> Jackson now the move?

    1. Cok3y5murf
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Bit sideways

    2. Lord of Ings
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Is he injured or something?

      1. Sho-kun
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        no

    3. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      If it is for free, go for it.

      1. Sho-kun
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        yess for free

    4. El_Matador
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I would for free. Chelsea fixtures look good and Watkins off pens

    5. PapaWengzz
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Proven striker vs guy with 0 PL returns and looks like darwin from last year

    6. Pariße
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      This is very risky. I’d rather have Sterling against Luton.

  2. The Mighty Whites
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    1FT, 0.0 ITB:

    Flekken - Turner
    Dias - Chilwell - Estupinan - Udogie - Kabore
    Rashford - Saka - Fernandes - Martinelli - Mbuemo
    Haaland - Watkins - Archer

    1. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Watkins to Jackson/Alvarez or save.

  3. HK123FC
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Who are people favouring to keep for gw3 Bruno or rash?

    As a United fan I think Bruno’s looked far better and had he converted a massive chance (and others converted some of his potential assists) his points hauls could have been a lot better.

    But rashford has that bigger haul potential and combined with his ownership is a more scary one to go without even if he’s looked less threatening

    1. JBG
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      The thing is though... Martial or Sancho might start as the striker this GW which makes Rashford a better asset to have for this GW.

      1. HK123FC
        • 2 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Mount injured means bruno guaranteed to be slightly further forward so he could also have higher returns?

        Martial or sancho or even reports of hojlund back would boost rash but no guarantee ETH doesn’t stick with rashford and garnacho

        1. JBG
          • 7 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          If he does stick with the same team(bar Mount) I will be kinda worried as a MU fan myself.

          1. HK123FC
            • 2 Years
            2 years, 3 months ago

            Agreed

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I'm keeping both. If I had to pick one it would be Bruno.

      1. HK123FC
        • 2 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        What I’m leaning to too

    3. El_Matador
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Only have Rashford but it's his last chance this week

    4. We Go Again
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      It's been a painful 2 weeks for us that own both but I have decided to keep both for 1 more week. I'm praying it pays off

      1. Pariße
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Better chance of Awoniyi and Gibbs-White tearing them a new one.

        1. HadiSLIM
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          there you go....

          Id honestly agree with a Rash + Brun --> GW + Awoniyi if the FPL gods would grant me these 2 for this game without hits.

        2. We Go Again
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Well at least if that happens I would get to laugh at Man United!

          1. HadiSLIM
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 5 Years
            2 years, 3 months ago

            yeh im happy with a 3-3 / 4-3 (Forest win)
            With bruno and rash scoring/assisting all three

  4. JBG
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Just went to look when City play SHU at home cause Haaland TC might be a shout for that tbh... it's GW20, but also noticed that GW20 is the same as GW3 just that the teams are reversed. So Luton play Chelsea at home, NFO play MU at home and so on.

    Thought that was a kinda interesting.

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      GW20 still long way to go. By then CL is in full force and chance for SHU to shape things up.

      I have decided to do TC now.

      1. JBG
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah was just saying tbf. TC now seems pretty good as well tbh. Hopefully City doesn't seem complacent while playing them this GW(for your sake if you TC).

      2. Cruyff's Eleven
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        TC with no Pep? Hmmm...

    2. theplayer
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      TC this week is extremely brave. I prefer to wait for a good DGW to have 2 bites at the cherry.

    3. Ze_Austin
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I expect City to be involved in the three DGWs again, as they usually do well in the cups (leading to EPL fixture postponements)

      I also think we'll have multiple DGW TC candidates this season, also like last season, so I'm in no rush to go there now

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Saw a post some days ago where someone said that bloke with all the spreadsheets (can't quite remember his name) is not expecting many double GW's this season.

        1. FOO FIGHTER
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Ben Crelin I think.

        2. JBG
          • 7 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          I think he actually meant, "big double GWs" as in multiple teams having DGWs. Might be wrong on this.

        3. HadiSLIM
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          correct - not as many as last year or the one before.

          But there will be a few chances here and there, and City will have there share - as mentioned above they usually do well in cups

  5. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    General thoughts on this WC?

    Trying not to worry about how point-chasey it is! Genuinely think it's a good fit re: form & fixtures with flexibility to move players out in the GWs ahead if needed. Triple City might be overkill, but could be an absolutely mauling with Sheffield and Fulham up next. Foden could be Rashford to keep the faith and see if he does owt.

    Flekken (Luton)

    Chilwell | Saliba | Estu (Botman, Bell)

    Foden | Diaz | Mitoma | Mbeumo | Saka

    Alvarez | Haaland (Wissa)

    1. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Luton = Leno.

    2. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Jackson and Gvardiol over Saliba and Alvarez

      1. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks 🙂

        Jackson/Alvarez is definitely a 50:50 I’m on. On Alvarez to blitz next two City fixtures then probably moving to Jackson or Isak.

        I hear you on Gvardiol but I’m very wary of Peproulette.

      2. Pariße
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Never!

        1. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 3 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Not a fan of those moves?

          Peproulette and unproven?

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Looks pretty good.

      Wissa is overkill for bench imo. You'll want to keep some money ITB for Alvarez > Isak or something like that.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Also, I'd triple Chelsea, triple City if I was on WC.

      2. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks for the helpful thoughts 🙂

        Yer Alvarez will become Isak or Jackson at some point down the line. I’ve actually got 3.3 itb.

        I hear you on Wissa but I’m ok with having a strong first sub.

        City triple up for sure. Trip Che feels a bit too punty for me until they start firing. Chilwell, Jackson, and ?? Sterling?

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          I quite like that pairing actually. If we're going for Isak before seeing how UCL rotation pans out, you then have the option of benching him occasionally when xMins seem at risk (e.g. tough away game in UCL where he plays close to 90 on a Wed)

          1. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 3 Years
            2 years, 3 months ago

            3-5-2 certainly has competition from 3-4-3. Guessing it’s similar to the reason for why hold off on WC: too early in the season for any hard trends.

            1. The Mentaculus
              • 4 Years
              2 years, 3 months ago

              In this instance, I don't mind jumping in before we've seen what UCL rotation of Isak/Wilson looks like. Its a risk but there's too many points up for grabs from Newcastle attack in the meantime

  6. Prison Mike
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    2 FT. Best move this week?

    A) Watkins -> Jackson

    B) Pickford -> Sanchez

    C) Both

    1. Cok3y5murf
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Your team must be very good

      1. Prison Mike
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Haha still got double United and double arsenal mids but no point selling this week

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Same situation here. I'm doing A.

      1. Prison Mike
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Everton just seem so bad though it seems very unlikely to get a CS from Pickford

        1. I Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Agreed. Watkins to Jackson gives me the funds to get Pickford up to Ederson which is tempting but I think it's better to have 2 frees for GW4 in case we need to get rid of ARS/MUN midfielders.

          1. Samsonite
            • 3 Years
            2 years, 3 months ago

            This is what I am weighing as well. Jackson is a punt but could see villa continue to spread the goals. Toss up whether I do Pickford to Ederson/Sanchez with my other free

  7. TanN
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Used my 2 FT

    A) don't take a hit
    B) Pedro --> Jackson / Alvarez
    C) Eze --> Mitoma / March / Diaby

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      B for me.

      If you have Foden already I'd get Jackson over Alvarez.

      1. Cruyff's Eleven
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Not keen on the Foden / Alvarez double?

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          I've gone for it myself but tbh, if I had 0.5m more I'd have bought Jackson over Alvarez just because it diversifies my attack a bit more and you get more nailed mins from Jackson.

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      A

  8. FPL Marc
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Any FPL questions for this week's Fantasy Football Community podcast?

  9. Warby84
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Diaby or Mitoma on WC

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Mitoma

  10. The Mantis
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Just curious on this one. I've got Archer and looks like he's heading to Sheff utd. I don't, but how would the game work if I already owned 3 Sheffield players then Archer changes from Villa? Hypothetical

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Before you can confirm a transfer, you will have to remove one SHU asset.

    2. Cruyff's Eleven
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      You'd be forced to transfer one out, next time you change your team.

    3. Buck The Trent
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      When you make a transfer, the game will ask you to sell one SHU player

      If you are not making transfers, you can have 4 SHU players

    4. Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      If you have 4 SHU players, then the authorities are alerted and your FPL account is locked.

  11. Zladan
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    GTG?

    Pickford
    Chilwell Estu Gvardiol
    Bruno Saka Martinelli Foden Mbeumo
    Haaland Jackson

    Turner JPedro Kabore Bell

    £2.5m in the bank.

    1. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      (Beyer not Bell but makes no diff).

  12. Cruyff's Eleven
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Remind me again: what are the arguments AGAINST wild-carding this week?

    1. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Probably too few changes to justify.

      Hold onto Arsenal and United assets one more week.

      1. Zladan
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Transfer window still open.

        Still question marks over teams strongest starting XI - including Arsenal Chelsea City.

        1. Zladan
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          International break around the corner.

          I mean are there any arguments FOR wildcarding?

      2. Jack Burton
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Yep 1 more week for me offload my Utd players then, got enough in the bank to do Pedro to Alvarez this week

      3. Cruyff's Eleven
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Dunno about that - I have Pickfut, Rashford, Gabriel, and no Mbuemo, Wissa, Alvarez or Foden...

    2. El_Matador
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      IB coming up. Your WC team could get ravaged by injuries.

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Team dependant.

    4. _Freddo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      The Online Warlords who direct the game haven’t give you permission to use it yet.

    5. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Luton and SHU say hi...

    6. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      2 weeks worth of data, so bandwagons still to emerge.

      But, if you really feel major surgery is needed because you have a slew of non performing or non nailed players then it may be just what you do need to do.

      Every case is different.

      1. Cruyff's Eleven
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        It's been scraping by. Saved by Ødegaard and Mitoma this week, while the rest stood by and looked on.

        As I said, I'd like to do
        Pickfut to Sanchez
        Gabriel to Saliba
        Rashford to Mbuemo
        Maddison to Foden
        Pedro to Wissa and
        Mubama to Alvarez

        1. The Bandit
          • 15 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          All good moves

        2. Nate(U)dog(ie)
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Maddison may only miss one game, Gabriel may come back into the fold with Zinchenko fit again (I think it'll happen). Mubamba and Pickford moves could be helpful but not sure they're absolute musts right now worth needing a WC on

        3. Jack Burton
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Good moves I'm not against early wils cards, my best seasons have been with an early wildcard, its just I know ill unload UTD players and they will do something

    7. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      - Not enough information to go on. You're looking at 2 games' worth of data to backup something you can't do again for another 17/18 weeks or so. Things can change very quickly (e.g. what if you, say, get rid of Bruno and Rashford, only for Højlund to be fit for the bench v Forest and ManUtd turn things around?)
      - Probably don't need to make enough changes right now to validate using it just yet
      - A long time to go without being able to make wholesale changes again if needed
      - Can't use it to target future fixture swings
      - IB after GW4 could cause havoc with injuries/availability issues

    8. Charlie Price
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Anyone wild carding this week should preferably roll their Wk4 transfer so as to allow 2FT’s ahead of Wk5 during the International break. Makes wildcarding this week less risky.

    9. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Most of the big teams are still in transition. We haven't seen what Arsenal look like without Nketiah, or Man Utd with Hojlund. What if Son starts playing up front & banging them in? Haaland permacappers got lucky this week but what if Salah is on fire come GW9 & your funds are all spread across a deep squad & require multiple hits to get him? Transfer window hasn't closed yet etc

      1. _Freddo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Surely with Salah you just build a squad with a route to him in 2 moves? For example, Odegaard & Luis Diaz easily moves to 4.5 & Salah (most Wildcard teams have money in the bank) if you do it properly you’ll have easy routes to him if all of a sudden Haaland & City stop scoring goals.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Its possible, but I'm looking at it like this. If I do Salah & 4.5m fwd to, say, Maddison & Isak, I have 2.6m left itb. Over the next few weeks, I'll probably start spreading that around, e.g. I have 2x 4m defenders & will likely upgrade one of them to Moreno when fit. So I just think if/when I get Salah back, I could make a tighter, more efficient use of my budget by re-examining how much I really need on the bench.

          1. _Freddo
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            2 years, 3 months ago

            That's fair, IMO no one will want Salah back if Haaland is still a permaC though, that's what you're really betting against, Haaland falling off a cliff.

            1. The Mentaculus
              • 4 Years
              2 years, 3 months ago

              Not quite "falling off a cliff" but I'd still like to take some calculated gambles against him, e.g. GWs9-10 City have BHA mun while Liverpool have EVE NFO. It certainly did get me into trouble at times last season (not capping Haaland) but nonetheless I'm kind of a risk-happy sort so I may well try again 🙂

              1. The Mentaculus
                • 4 Years
                2 years, 3 months ago

                And even though it didn't really pay off this week I'm still happy with the decision

    10. WVA
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      It's only been two weeks so we know very little

    11. Cruyff's Eleven
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks so much. REALLY appreciate the responses! Just awesome and why I'm happy to be a subscriber.

      Think patience is required. A few transfers are required - I want Wissa and one of Foden / Alvarez but you're right - there's no guarantee that the WC team runs into a brick wall, or the players being removed are just slow starters / dependent on external factors (e.g. Hojlund and Zinchenko starting).

      Cheers all!

    12. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      It's too early. We don't know yet if teams are actually just having a slow start or are just bad.

      I will not WC before GW7 for sure because I need more information. 6 weeks is usually my time frame for the data to really come together. Currently looking at GW8 as my targeted WC week.

      1. HadiSLIM
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Same.

        I built my team around a WC 7.

        And ill stick to my strategy - even though and ESPECIALLY that im doing horrible:

        - I built my first team and it didnt fly well
        - what are the chances that ill do so AGAIN only armed with 2 weeks worth of data? high
        - A WC now automatically means lots of hits when fixtures swing

        sticking to my strategy - i built it with certain leeways if things go wrong (and they have, horribly), but a WC isnt one of them.

    13. Pariße
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      No real representable sample of data to facilitate an informed decision on this season’s best players.

    14. Old Man
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      If you do then I guarantee thta you will regret it a few game weeks down the line.

  13. Buck The Trent
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Hoping Archer completes his 18M move to SHU before deadline. Have Maddison, Gabriel and Pedro in my team !

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Is he really going to fare better than every other Sheff United striker in the PL?

      1. El Presidente
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Like Brewster....

      2. Nomar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        This is my thought too.

        Yes he's cheap but SHU aren't really very good so not sure how well he'll fare there.

        I think I prefer Morris at Luton. I think he's a tidy striker.

      3. Buck The Trent
        • 14 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        I am happy with a 2 pointer from him .. there are risk that Gabriel, Pedro and Maddy wont play at all !

    2. Pariße
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      He’s obvioulsy just a fodder for 3-5-2 positioned teams to have on the bench just in case.

  14. Tonyawesome69
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Between the two options below and likely will be a decision on Friday.

    Which one would you go for?

    A. Watkins to Alvarez/Jackson and save 2nd FT
    B. Watkins and Rashford to Alvarez/Jackson and Foden

    2FT 1.0ITB
    Pickford
    Estupinan Saliba Chilwell
    Saka Mbeumo Bruno Rashford Martinelli
    Haaland Watkins
    (Turner Baldock Kabore Archer)

    1. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Very similar to mine - just the below diffs.

      Rashford v Foden
      Watkins v Jackson
      Saliba v Gvardiol
      Archer v JPedro

      If you do B, it’s basically the same. I like that.

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I have your same 11 except Mitoma instead of Mbeumo. I'm doing A. Foden is tempting but I'm giving Rash one last shot.

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Just trying to weigh up 2FTs for GW4 vs Foden next 2 fixtures

  15. kellamergh
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Which midfielder would you switch for Foden, to get N.Jackson?

    Onana
    Chilwell Estupinan Colwill
    Mbeumo Mitoma Rashford Saka Salah
    Haaland Pedro

    Turner Gabriel, Mubama Baldock

    0m itb
    2FT

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Salah or Rashford

    2. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I did Salah and Mubamba to Foden and Jackson.

    3. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Rashford, at least Salah is returning

      1. kellamergh
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Cheers guys

  16. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Have Salah, happy to start the season with him but could Diaz 'cover' as Liverpool cover?

    1. shearer9
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      For me Salah has that explosiveness you want from a captaincy option

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        I'm a Salah owner and I don't think I'm gonna captain him until GW9 at the earliest. He's expendable if you need the funds imo.

        1. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Cheers, don't really need the funds as will be downgrading Bruno > 6.5/7 mid and upgrading forwards.
          I like have Salah in the team as gives flexibility to get some funds with max 2 transfers.

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I have both.

    3. El Presidente
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      If you went with Salah at the start you just stick

      1. space mercenary
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Why?

    4. HNI
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Just thinking of cover doesn't guarantee great points..if you think Liverpool will score most goals over next 6 keep else move for player from team you think may like Mcity, Ars

    5. _Freddo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Compare their numbers in the members area and you'll find your answer, no one will ever cover Salah but they could certainly contribute.

      1. _Freddo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Lateriser has a very useful table in the members section called 'Attackers only' go and compare them (with Jota)

  17. shearer9
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Best 4.5 bench defender on wc? Atm choosing between Pinnock/Botman/Romero but open to others

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Is Udogie still 4.5? Far better punt than Romero.

      Pinnock and Botman along with Colwill are prolly he best.

  18. dansmith1985
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Took a -4 to bring in Gusto,Henry and Wissa for Stones,Gabriel and Pedro,hope it pays off

    1. gart888
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Feel like you could have done two of those moves to save the hit?

  19. Dynamic Duos
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Any ideas what to do here please? 2fts

    Pickford
    Chilwell Estupinan Saliba
    Saka Foden Jota Rashford Bruno
    Haaland Jackson

    Turner Pedro Baldock Kabore

    1. HNI
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Probably replace Baldock if his injury is serious as your team is top notch

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Change your GK and roll 2nd FT

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Good idea

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 3 months ago

          Better to use FT that impacts your main 11 rather than a change around the edges on bench options

    3. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      As others have said: keeper or bench cover change and roll the FT.

      Keeper probably priority.

    4. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      That's a really nice team.

      I'd still sell Rashford to diversify in case of another dud United performance. Rash > Mbeumo and then sell Pickford this week seems a luxury you can afford.

    5. Dynamic Duos
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Cheers all

  20. HNI
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Start
    1) Gabriel (Fulham) home or
    2) Joao( Westham) home

    1. Malkmus
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I'd be looking to start both, but Pedro if pushed

      1. HNI
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah right now I am starting Pedro as he is penalty taker, Or should I take -4 and get Jackson in for 4.5mn fwd?

    2. gart888
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I sold both lol

      1. HNI
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        Gabriel will go next week or so for NewC defender but Cannot let go of Pedro just yet as BHA are lit and he takes penalties if he starts again

    3. Bob B
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Probably wait a bit closer to the deadline to make this decision, may have more insight as to whether Gabriel or Pedro plays.
      If both are benched, you'd still rather play Pedro over Gabriel, so he would be my choice.
      Thanks for your reply!

    4. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Joao.

    5. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Joao should start this week. On penalties and a decent fixture.

    6. FPLFocal
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I actually think Gabriel, he surely starts with Tomiyasu + Timber out. Zinchenko presumably comes in and inverts from the left which means Gabriel has to start on the left side of the back 3. Enciso was really good last gameweek so it seems a bit 50/50 if Joao comes back in to me

      1. FPLFocal
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        (though I expected Gabriel to start vs Palace so what do I know haha)

  21. Bob B
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    3.5M ITB, 1FT.

    Johnstone (Turner)
    Chilwell Gusto Estu (Udogie Kabore)
    Saka Martinelli Odegaard Rashford Richarlison
    Haaland Pedro (Simms)

    Pedro or Simms to Jackson?
    Anything different?

    1. HNI
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Simms to Jackson as your bench is weak because of Pedro starting doubts...Can advice me above mate?

  22. Nanordub
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    2FT with 0 ITB. Which transfers would you recommend?

    Onana
    Gabriel Estu Chilwell Tippier
    Saka Rash Bruno Richarlison
    JP Watkins Haaland

    A) JP/Rashford - > Wissa/Foden , this gives Gabriel another week assuming he won't drop more. Can playe 3 up top and 3 at the back
    B) Gabriel/Richarlison/Rashford - > Henry/Foden/Odegaard
    C) other?

  23. Malkmus
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    A'noon all. GTG? 1FT, 0.5 ITB

    Onana (Turner)
    Saliba - Estu - Chilwell
    Salah - Saka - Rodri - Bruno F - Mbeumo
    Haaland (c) - Jackson

    Subs - Beyer, Archer, Baldock

    A - Save FT
    B - Baldock to Gusto
    C - Other

    Ta!

  24. rivo4england
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    On a WC. Would you go for:

    A) Saka
    B) Ødegaard
    C) Bruno

    1. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Probably Odegaard now if he's on pens.

      1. Pariße
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        The penalties are shared at Arsenal. Odegaard took the decision as a captain and asked Saka if he could take it. Probably due to the importance of that penalty and Saka's shaky record.

    2. boc610
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Saka all day, most in form of those 3

    3. nico05
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      A

    4. WVA
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      B

  25. gart888
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Anything worth a hit here?

    Pickford
    Chilwell Estupinan Gusto
    Salah Foden Saka Bruno Richarlison
    Haaland Alvarez

    Turner Kabore Baldock Simms

    1. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      No

  26. GCM0803
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Salah to Diaz for funds?

    1. Pariße
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      In a big game (Newcastle away), you can only really count on Salah.

      1. Lovren an elevator
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 3 months ago

        This

  27. Bishopool
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Would you?

    Pedro, Bruno -> Jackson, Mbuemo (for free; 2FT-s)

    1. Bishopool
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I have Salah, but Salah seems producing more than Bruno

  28. Pariße
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    What does Guardiola's back injury mean for the Pep roulette? Same starters until he returns?

    1. Conners
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Depends on how quickly the morphine wears off.

  29. Zimo
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    City are trying to get Eze. Pep ruining another fpl option

    1. Old Man
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I don't blame them - he's wasted at CP. As for FPL, not such good news.

  30. Lovren an elevator
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Anyone have the latest news on the maddison injury?