784 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. waltzingmatildas
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Flekken Turner
    Trippier Burn Cash Tark Baldock
    Bruno Son Maddison Mitoma JWP
    Haaland Watkins Alvarez

    Which do you prefer?
    A) Bruno, Maddison, JWP to Salah, Palmer, Soucek (-4)
    B) Bruno, Son, Maddison to
    Salah, Saka, Palmer (-4)
    C) Bruno, Maddison, JWP, Alvarez to Salah, Martinelli, Soucek, Archer (-8)
    D) WC - would still have to lose Bruno and one or two of Trippier/Son/Maddison/Watkins/Alvarez to get Salah and Saka

    1. Winston.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

    2. Big Mike
      3 years, 1 day ago

      How much money do you have to spend? Can you afford Bruno + Maddison to Salah and Gordon?

      1. waltzingmatildas
        3 years, 1 day ago

        No unfortunately not. Only have 0.5itb

  2. Bigler
    3 years, 1 day ago

    What to do with this team? 2ft 1.2itb

    Turner
    Schär Udogie Cash
    Salah Son Bruno Diaby Gordon
    Haaland Solanke

    Areola Botman Kabore Archer

    A) Bruno>Saka
    B) Bruno+Gordon>Saka+Mitoma
    C) Other?

    Thanks!

    1. Winston.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    2. Big Mike
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A. Keep Gordon.

    3. waltzingmatildas
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    4. FFS ManU
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    5. The Mighty Hippo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      c) Bruno + Solanke > Saka + Darwn?

  3. Letsgo!
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Do rash and anderson to saka and palmer now?

    1. Joelinton Travel Tavern
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Definitely not now

      Ars have a massive CL game and Saka nursing an injury. Could easily pick up a knock.

  4. theodosios
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Any chance this freaking BPS will ever change? Giving BP based on some totally irrelevant factors is really humiliating for many fans of this game.

    1. Mirror Man
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Why? The system seems to be reasonable and working just fine.

      1. theodosios
        3 years, 1 day ago

        If you think that passing ball to keeper and player next to - giving you advantage in BPS...then it's ok.

        1. Mirror Man
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Quite the hullabaloo over nothing, in my opinion.

      2. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Agreed. Works just fine. I understand it and don’t recall being humiliated by FPL bonus points before.

    2. Sure You Did
      3 years, 1 day ago

      What player don't you own that you are crying about?

      1. theodosios
        3 years, 1 day ago

        I am actually going good this GW, that's not the point. BPS is disaster.

    3. Conners
      3 years, 1 day ago

      My only complaint about BPS, is when the BPS points totals change after the game has finished.

      1. Joelinton Travel Tavern
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Why? There will always be marginal decisions for the opta lot, just like for the refs. Was it a pass or a key pass, a chance or a big chance etc. They don't have time to finalise everything while the game is still playing. Seems an odd thing to have a problem with.

      2. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Meh

    4. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Humiliating 😆

    5. Zalk
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I've been a fan of FPL for over 20 years, can't say I've noticed much of a difference this or the last seasons.
      Which factors do you find irrelevant?

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Fantasy football maybe, not FPL

        1. Zalk
          3 years, 1 day ago

          No, fpl

        2. Zalk
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Fantasy football since before 2000, fpl since 2002 I think.

          1. Rupert The Horse
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Ah. Thought it was 03. Been playing FF since mid 90’s too.

    6. Herger
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I too am absolutely enraged at the BPS just not being awarded to the players I would like them to be awarded too. Contemplating taking this to the media

    7. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      System is mostly fine imo

    8. Maddamotha
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I agree, and I've said so numerous times on here as well. The BPS system is flawed to say the least.

  5. Winston.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    I could get one of these front eigths with a couple of moves... abd wildcard later, if needed. Which one is the best option? Your opinion?

    A.
    Salah Saka Maddison Bowen Son
    Watkins Alvarez Jesus

    B.
    Salah Saka Maddison Bowen Mitoma
    Haaland Alvarez Archer

    1. Apollo Sanchez
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    2. Stimps
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B all day

      A is just a headache. No point having Jesus if he's gonna stay on your bench

      1. Winston.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Yeah, headache maybe, but in A I could rotate Jesus, Maddison and Bowen depending on the fixture. And there’s gonna be injuries surelt.

      2. Joelinton Travel Tavern
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Completely agree. Never seen the appeal in having to bench a proven pointsman every week

  6. Apollo Sanchez
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    On WC

    A) Gordon & Alvarez

    B) Mitoma & Ferguson

    1. waltzingmatildas
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A all the way

    3. Il Capitano
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    4. Winston.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

    5. Stranger Mings
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

  7. hbyart95
    3 years, 1 day ago

    What to do 2 free transfers?

    A) Drop son and lamptey for Saka and Gabriel

    B) Drop Maddison and Bowen for Saka and Diaby

    1. AIRMILES
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I wouldn't drop Bowen. I'm considering bringing him in for Maddison.

  8. Ronnies
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Areola
    Cash Schar Udogie
    Salah Son Saka JWP Mbuemo
    Haaland Alvarez

    Flekken Botman Archer Kabore

    2 Free Transfers, zero ITB.
    Will definitely do Mbuemo > Diaby.

    Other transfer?
    A) Botman > Tsimikas
    B) Schar > Gabriel
    C) Udogie > Gabriel

    Cannot afford to do Botman to Gabriel otherwise it's a no brainer. Tsimikas or Gabriel is the decision.

    Cheers.

  9. FOO FIGHTER
    3 years, 1 day ago

    I think LiveFPL is the best tool you can use to see why your rank is struggling, what is best for your team and players you can do without. Gives you live updates of players who are most dangerous to your rank and you could end up making your transfer decisions much easier.

    Whoever created that platform is an FPL genius!

    1. AIRMILES
      3 years, 1 day ago

      FFScout did a video chat with the guy who made it. Super nice chap who's doing a PhD at MIT. The site is hosted on the MIT server, so it surprises me that it goes down under dense traffic. Top bloke though and top site.

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Mine was better 😆

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Those who don't own Trippier, GL 😆

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yeah it’s been about quite a while. Do you know the whole site is run by just one man?

      1. FOO FIGHTER
        3 years, 1 day ago

        His platform is one of the reasons why I decided to go without Haaland.

        1. FOO FIGHTER
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Haaland is still an amazing pick but when you and everyone else is getting his points whether he hauls or not just pretty much cancels everything out.

          1. FOO FIGHTER
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Because of his high ownership

            1. Toon lurk
              3 years, 1 day ago

              Wait isn’t this the opposite of what you’re saying about trippier above?

          2. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Hardly an amazing pick then.

            1. FOO FIGHTER
              3 years, 1 day ago

              Team dependant

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                3 years, 1 day ago

                So he's amazing to those who own and amazing for those that don't, get it now.

                1. FOO FIGHTER
                  3 years, 1 day ago

                  It depends on what team you have. You could have a team with Mo and Haaland but that does not mean you are going to have good GW's.

                  This is a game. How you have set up your team and who you cap is what it comes down to with or without one of Salah and Haaland. Owning both leaves you with no options.

                  1. TorresMagic™
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    3 years, 1 day ago

                    Perhaps amazing wasn't the word to use. Either way, good luck for the season.

                    1. FOO FIGHTER
                      3 years, 1 day ago

                      Yeah bro, I am going to finish one full season.

                      GL, you are a top player so you don't need any advice 😉

                      1. Men in green tights
                        3 years, 1 day ago

                        Out of interest how many times have you started a season

        2. Haa-lala-land
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Have you gone without Haaland, Foo Fighter?

          You've never mentioned this before.

      2. Zalk
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Thanks!

        1. FOO FIGHTER
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Yes, for anyone on a WC, that site is super useful building a new team.

    4. oi no professionals
      3 years, 1 day ago

      The “what if” feature is not good for your mental health tho

      1. Zalk
        3 years, 1 day ago

        haha, very true

  10. SpaceCadet
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Better option on wc?

    A. Diaby jwp
    B. Bowen Neto

    1. FFS ManU
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

    2. Waltomade
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Easy b

  11. BusbySwede
    3 years, 1 day ago

    On WC, 0.0 itb
    What do you think?

    Areola
    Trippier, Cash, Udogie, Tsimikas
    Salah, Saka, Mitoma, Maddison
    Haaland, Watkins

    Turner, Palmer, Coufal, Archer

    Would you make any obvious changes/transfers?
    How about trying to fit in Diaby and/or Bowen? Downgrade someone to upgrade Palmer and/or Archer?

    1. FFS ManU
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Mitoma to Neto?

    2. Conners
      3 years, 1 day ago

      My personal preference would be Alvarez, Diaby and Bowen instead of Watkins, Maddison and Palmer.

      Team looks good, although I'm not fan of playing 4 defs.

    3. WVA
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Nice team, glad to see I made the right choice wildcarding a few weeks back as current WC teams are exactly the same. I'm on the below.

      Areola
      Trippier Cash Udogie Gabriel
      Salah Saka Maddison Bowen
      Haaland Watkins
      Turner Foster Palmer Tsimi

    4. Waltomade
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Trippier to gabriel

      1. WVA
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Trippier has 4 points less than Haaland for 7m less

        1. Old Man
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          3 years, 1 day ago

          4 points fewer.

          1. Goro Majima
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            3 years, 1 day ago

            I've googled this as a result of your post and learnt something. Thanks.

            1. Old Man
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              3 years, 1 day ago

              Apologies - thank you for being so polite. I don't want to sound like the grammar police but fewer is correct in this context. If no-one says anything about this on here then everyone will continue to use less (which probably they will anyway).
              So, fewer VAR disputes, less arguing with the ref, fewer points for my FPL oppo and less hassle from the taxman please.

              1. Goro Majima
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                3 years, 1 day ago

                No need to apologise - I wasn't being sarcastic or anything. Genuinely interested and would prefer to use my own language correctly!

          2. Herger
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Alright, Stannis

  12. Messi_88
    3 years, 1 day ago

    2 players from my team playing today for both Aston Villa and West Ham United.

    Bowen
    Watkins

    Was It a good decision to play both cause of expected plenty goals in the match?

    1. Bobby Digital
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yeah good decision, can't be benching players like that

    2. Waltomade
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yes

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Well they’re not defenders…

    4. My heart goes Salalalalah
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I doubt you benched better players...

    5. Zalk
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I don't think it's wrong to hedge your bets like that. Sometimes I play a striker and a defender that face each other just to even out the swings a bit.

    6. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I expect goals so yes. Villa have been scoring for fun at home while Bowen has scored in every away game

    7. WVA
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Both to blank imo

    8. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      every team is going to play each other twice, you can't avoid it and imho you shouldn't try to either.

    9. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      why wouldn't you

  13. Bobby Digital
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Team atm...

    Areola
    Burn Cash Udogie
    Salah Saka Maddison Son Mbeumo
    Haaland Alvarez

    Leno Gusto Archer Bell

    0.1m itb, 2ft

    Planning to do Mbeumo to Diaby and roll the other transfer. Got any other ideas?

    1. Valar(Keith)
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Good plan. Similar to my dilemma since we have exactly the same team. Will be scouting diaby tnite and will go either him or mitoma. Can't go wrong with either next few weeks by the looks of it

      1. Silecro
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Im on wc and will probably go with both of them

  14. Joelinton Travel Tavern
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Areola (Turner)
    Trip Cash Udog (Tsim Taylor)
    Salah Son Madd Gordon Palmer
    Haal Watkins (Archer)

    Set on a 3-4-2 core with a rotating 11th man - Palmer, Tsimi, maybe even the occasional Archer runout.

    I guess the issue is no Arsenal, so time for some S&M, which move is better?

    1) Son to Saka
    2) Madd to Marti

    1. Bobby Digital
      3 years, 1 day ago

      1

    2. FFS ManU
      3 years, 1 day ago

      1

  15. Valar(Keith)
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Got 2 Fts and Botman and Mbeumo i need to get rid of

    Don't really need the cash so don't mind spending all my cash ie 6.7 for a mid and 4.7 for a defender . Which mid and defender do I bring in?

    6.7 mid.. which one?
    Diaby/Mitoma/Gordon/Neto/Palmer

    4.7 defender.. which one?

    Gabriel/Tsimikas

    1. Bobby Digital
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Diaby
      Gabriel

      1. Valar(Keith)
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Cheers

  16. Hansel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Palmer or Soucek?

    1. Stranger Mings
      3 years, 1 day ago

      P

    2. DannyDrinkVodka
      3 years, 1 day ago

      You read my mind

      1. DannyDrinkVodka
        3 years, 1 day ago

        It’s not an easy call

    3. Valar(Keith)
      3 years, 1 day ago

      If you need a sub 5.0 mid then it has to be Palmer imo. Such a good benchable option if playing 3 4 3

    4. Sure You Did
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Considering both tbh. I have brought in Palmer with one of my FT and will scout Soucek in the hole today.

  17. Silecro
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Subject to changes ofc but, how is this for a WC?

    Areola
    Trippier, Coufal, Pau
    Salah, Saka, Diaby, Mitoma
    Haaland, Watkins, Alvarez

    Turner, Kilman, Taylor, Nakamba
    0.0 itb

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yeah not bad. I’d want to see what happens with all the other big mids first

      1. Silecro
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Yes. Keeping an eye on Tot game tomorrow, Bowen also

    2. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      It’s nice. I can’t get the mids I want along with that front 3 without dropping Trip.

  18. Jordan.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    eagles/dolphins 115am,humdinger

    1. Andrew D48
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Been an Eagles fan for 35 years

  19. tryf88
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Best replacement for Botman or Akanji? Thinking of Burn but fixutes not ideal

    1. FOO FIGHTER
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Get rid of any City defensive assets unless you want to enjure pain of not knowing who is starting next GW. Ortega was in goal this week lol

    2. lilmessipran
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Think long term Burn/Newcastle defender is the best choice at that 4.5-4.8 price point regardless of the fixtures

  20. lilmessipran
    3 years, 1 day ago

    I have to bench one from this lot next week, which one?

    A Trips
    B Cash
    C Porro
    D Zinch

    Currently on C but Palace are shite offensively right now

    1. Rico123
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I’m the same but with Saliba instead of Zinc, and yes currently on benching Porro (and playing Cash, Tripp, Saliba) but feel it’s one of those destined to have the benched player outscore one of your starters whoever you pick

      1. Men in green tights
        3 years, 1 day ago

        I’m playing the spurs player and benching the arsenal one at the moment

  21. ChickenTikkaMoSalah
    3 years, 1 day ago

    A) Son and Saka
    B) Salah and Palmer

    1. lilmessipran
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A if you need to play both each week, if you can rotate Palmer with say a decent defender then it is a lot closer.

      1. ChickenTikkaMoSalah
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Yeah Palmer would be playing each week. Just feel like no Salah is really hurting me

    2. FOO FIGHTER
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Son, Saka, Salah.

      Tough choices but these three players I reckon will be the highest points scorers this season in no particular order.

      1. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Triple S back for me next week Foo!

        1. FOO FIGHTER
          3 years, 1 day ago

          And then there is Trippier as well 😆

          1. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
            3 years, 1 day ago

            I have him thankfully!

            1. FOO FIGHTER
              3 years, 1 day ago

              Alvarez my go to asset. I would not get rid of Tripps for anyone though. He fecks my rank up religiously 😆

              I just want to see Nkunku in action as well.

              1. Mambino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                3 years, 1 day ago

                what about for Watson for the next few fixtures?

                1. FOO FIGHTER
                  3 years, 1 day ago

                  I am going to roll with Nunez for now. Have Gordon if leaks suggest Nunez does not start.

                  1. Mambino
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    3 years, 1 day ago

                    I was thinking of moving Alverez to Watkins - bad move?

                2. FOO FIGHTER
                  3 years, 1 day ago

                  My current team

                  Areola Turner
                  Tripps Cash White Anderson Porro
                  Salah Son Saka Bowen Gordon
                  Alvarez Watkins Nunez

                  Have enough options to play whatever team I want to.

                  49 points so far, Son cap, Porro, Bowen and Watkins to go.

                  It is fun.

                  1. Mambino
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    3 years, 1 day ago

                    nice

                  2. Mambino
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    3 years, 1 day ago

                    Still feels too brave for me going no Haaland

                    1. FOO FIGHTER
                      3 years, 1 day ago

                      You get everyone else's points when owning Haaland. Capped him 6 GW's and my rank is still poo.

                      But anyway, I will repeat, it is team dependant whether you go without Salah or Haaland. Your cap pic will decide your rank depending on the rest of your team as well.

                      50/50

              2. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
                3 years, 1 day ago

                Yeah Alvarez mainstay in mine too

  22. Cok3y5murf
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Alvarez to Watkins (-4)?

    1. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Nah

    2. ChickenTikkaMoSalah
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Wouldn’t be losing Alvarez even on a free, unless I’m missing an injury?

  23. mcflyjohn
    3 years, 1 day ago

    On a WC tinkering atm trying to get all the big uns in.

    What do we think of this? I'm aware the defence is awful

    Areola (Turner)

    Udogie - Burn - Cash (Mengi / Beyer)

    Salah - Maddison - Saka - Maddison (Palmer OR Longstaff)

    Watkins - Alvarez - Haaland

    Ideally would've wanted Johnstone, but £0.1m short

    People being dropped - Bruno, Onana, Mbeumo, Botman Pedro

    1. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      You don't need Madison twice

      1. mcflyjohn
        3 years, 1 day ago

        But I like him that much!

        My bad, should be Mitoma

        1. Mambino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Look pretty good to me - you might consider Diaby instead of Mitoma I guess?

    2. g40steve
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Maddy & his brother?

  24. SpaceCoyote97
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    2FT, 0.2 ITB

    Areola-Leno
    Trippier-Saliba-Cash-Udogie-Estu
    Saka-Maddison-Mbeumo-Diaby-Bowen
    Haaland-Alvarez-Watkins

    What's my next move? Either have a choice of playing safe and swapping the injured Estu for a cheaper player, or could take a -4 or -8 for Salah by gutting my midfield a bit?

  25. Releasebreaks
    3 years, 1 day ago

    No make sense only 1 match on Sunday, is like we still in International Break

    1. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I’m glad it’s later in the day rather than at like 1-2

    2. SpaceCoyote97
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Me agree no make sense. Me think Monday game pointless, especially because Spurs play Friday too.

    3. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Good having a Monday night game though

  26. Maddamotha
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Will Tsimkas start? Little worrying with him being taken off at around 60

    1. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I think so, and I'd be happy if he keeps getting subbed after 60 minute mark - more likely to get cleanies

      1. Maddamotha
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Sure. But it's also a sign that he will likely be benched if it contiunes, like Chilwell.

  27. BIind Moth
    3 years, 1 day ago

    I've just noticed that Coufal has gone under the radar. He's had an assist in each of his last 4 games which really surprised me. West Ham have some really nice fixture's coming up too. I know most people have Areola and wont like the double up, but maybe one to consider for those who don't. I will certainly be considering Udogie > Coufal soon, if he gets another yellow card.

    1. Eze Really?
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Not great defensively. You must have been down the Coufal route before?

      1. BIind Moth
        3 years, 1 day ago

        After today they have one of the easiest fixture runs in the league. For 4.6m do you expect clean sheets and attacking returns every game?

        1. Eze Really?
          3 years, 1 day ago

          There was no criticism bud. Of course I don't. Just look at the history. Not saying a bad pick but indicating another narrative.

    2. Maddamotha
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Considering him on a WC now. Cheap and good fixtures, and a few attacking returns as well. A good option IMO.

  28. KeanosMagic
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Maddison and Watkins or Salah and Mitoma?

    Different positions, but will be switching bench fodder from midfield to attack

    1. Maddamotha
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Salah and Mitoma

  29. Men in green tights
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Money talks , followed by European fixtures ( still money)

  30. Eze Really?
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Have TV's started to improve?
    103.5 now good compared to most but real sale value only 101.9.