Scout Notes
10 August 2026 79 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

We’re looking at more Fantasy takeaways from the penultimate weekend of pre-season friendlies in our Scout Notes.

Here, we focus on Liverpool v Monaco and Arsenal v Borussia Dortmund.


LIVERPOOL 2-3 Monaco

  • Goals: Isak, Wirtz
  • Assists: Gravenberch, Isak

Liverpool XI: Alisson (Mamardashvili 46), Frimpong (Ramsey 75), Ndukwe (Endo 46), van Dijk (Chambers 60), Tsimikas (Kerkez 60), Szoboszlai (Elliott 75), Gravenberch (McConnell 60), Koumas (Chiesa 75), Wirtz (Nyoni 60), Gakpo (Ngumoha 60), Isak (Munoz 60)

  • It was a tale of two halves at Anfield on Sunday. Liverpool led 2-1 at half-time, but experienced a rapid drop-off after the break.
  • Alisson Becker (£5.5m), Virgil van Dijk (£6.5m) and Cody Gakpo (£7.0m) made their first appearances of pre-season, while for the second successive friendly, Alexander Isak (£9.0m) led the line with Florian Wirtz (£7.5m) in the ‘10’.
  • Liverpool’s attack looked really sharp for 45 minutes. Isak netted the opener with a well-taken finish, before Wirtz swept home the second after a goalmouth scramble. The hosts were unable to sustain their level, however, as Monaco fought back to win 3-2.

“I think we are, right now, especially considering we won the first two games but the last two we cannot sustain the level that we want for all the game. As soon as we have made some changes they start to get tired, we cannot sustain that level, so we have work to do.” – Andoni Iraola

  • Despite defeat, it was an encouraging display from Liverpool’s front two. Isak looked sharp and delivered his first attacking returns of pre-season, while Wirtz found plenty of space between the lines, scored and forced a decent save from the Monaco ‘keeper, with four shots in total.

“I feel good, I feel good. Every game hopefully should take me to a better fitness level, so that’s what I’m working towards. I think today felt better than [the] last game and hopefully the next game feels better than today. That’s what pre-season is for – building – and that’s what we have to keep doing.” – Alexander Isak

  • It was a quieter afternoon for Dominik Szoboszlai (£7.0m), who played in central midfield alongside Ryan Gravenberch (£6.0m) before pushing further forward late on. He failed to have a shot but did produce three key passes.
  • Andoni Iraola made six substitutions on the hour mark, with Victor Munoz (£6.5m) sent on for his Liverpool debut.
  • Defensively, however, there were issues. 18-year-old Ifeanyi Ndukwe partnered van Dijk at the back and was solid for the most part, but the Reds let a two-goal lead slip for the second successive pre-season friendly.
  • Iraola at least hopes to have Jeremy Jacquet (£5.0m) back for next weekend’s clash against Como. Ronald Araujo should arrive from Barcelona on loan too, so reinforcements are on the way.

“Jeremy Jacquet, we were in doubt whether to put him [in the squad] today, we decided not but he should be fine for the next one. It is taking a little bit of time, as we expected. Curtis [Jones], he has trained every day but yesterday finished with issues in the hip. It doesn’t look anything big but it didn’t make any sense to risk and those are the ones, more or less, closer to a return.” – Andoni Iraola


ARSENAL 2-3 Borussia Dortmund

FPL pre-season: Tzolis “sharp”, Timber, Saliba + Jacquet injury latest 1

  • Goals: Nwaneri, Gyokeres pen
  • Assists: Tzolis x2

Arsenal XI: Kepa (Meslier 46), White (O’Neill 77), Mosquera (Ogunnaike 77), Gabriel (Hincapie 60), Calafiori (Salmon 60), Lewis-Skelly, Odegaard (Nwaneri 32, Viera 77), Havertz (Martinelli 77), Dowman (Julienne 77), Tzolis (Ibrahim 77), Gyokeres (Jesus 77)

  • Despite having a greater share of possession (56.5%) and registering 14 shots to eight, Arsenal were beaten 3-2 by Borussia Dortmund on Sunday.
  • Mikel Arteta made two alterations to his starting XI from the previous friendly, a 3-1 loss to Real Betis: Gabriel Magalhaes (£8.0m) and Martin Odegaard (£6.5m) in for Piero Hincapie (£5.5m) and Ethan Nwaneri (£5.5m). Odegaard played for just over 30 minutes before a pre-planned substitution, having only recently returned from the World Cup with Norway.
  • The Gunners lined up with Ben White (£5.5m), Cristhian Mosquera (£5.5m), Gabriel and Riccardo Calafiori (£5.5m) at the back, with Myles Lewis-Skelly (£5.5m) anchoring the midfield. However, they were a bit of a mess defensively and went in at half-time 2-0 down. They’ve now conceded six times across their last two friendly matches.

“… I think there were some poor moments where we were not very recognisable, especially in set-pieces and defending actions and timings that we are normally very efficient [in].” – Mikel Arteta

  • White did at least look decent offensively from right-back. Given Jurrien Timber’s (£6.5m) injury, he could have a bigger part to play at the start of the season. The same applies to Mosquera, unless Arsenal sign a new centre-back, of course.

“No, I cannot be very precise with that. Jurrien is progressing really well. He’s on the pitch, he’s doing quite a lot right now, but it’s still weeks away. I cannot tell you how much.

“William Saliba is in rest mode at the moment for two weeks. He had to do almost nothing, an aggravated injury, so it’s going to take some time to heal. We know that. And as soon as we have more news, we can inform you.” – Mikel Arteta on Jurrien Timber and William Saliba’s injuries

  • Nwaneri pulled one back for Arsenal after the break. Viktor Gyokeres (£7.5m) then netted from the penalty spot, with Christos Tzolis (£6.5m) getting another assist. On some set-pieces, the Greek winger was a real livewire down the left flank, and has now delivered five attacking returns in pre-season. One of Arsenal’s clear standout performers, he could well be a starter against Coventry City in Gameweek 1.

“Really strong. I think he looks fit, he looks confident, he looks sharp. He made the assist, he created a penalty, he had another two or three very good moments. His work rate is unbelievable so far – very good things.” – Mikel Arteta on Christos Tzolis

  • Elsewhere, Kai Havertz (£7.5m) got another start in midfield but failed to make much of an impact. Gyokeres, meanwhile, attempted four shots but was often clumsy in possession and didn’t have a good game.
  • As for Lewis-Skelly, he had to play as a No 6 simply because so many other midfielders aren’t available yet. That changes from Monday, with Declan Rice (£7.5m), Martin Zubimendi (£5.5m), Bruno Guimaraes (£7.0m) and Mikel Merino (£6.0m), plus several others, set to re-join the squad.   

“Well, some of them were back today, already watching the game. Some of them, David [Raya] and Bukayo [Saka], were back yesterday, a bit earlier than expected, which is great to see. I think it’s a really good sign and tomorrow everybody will be available to start the training programme.” – Mikel Arteta

  • Arsenal’s pre-season preparations come to an end on Wednesday, when they face Como at the Emirates Stadium. Then, it’s the Community Shield against Manchester City on Sunday.

79 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. 17th Time Lucky
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    1 hour, 49 mins ago

    Some Bruno vs Haaland musings (early disclaimer, I'm in the camp of they're only worth their cost if captaining them - so I'm only going for one)

    Haaland + 5.5 =21
    Bruno + Isak =21
    So I'm comparing these two pairs. I'm going to use assumptions that I think are consistently slightly generous and assuming no major injuries. Feel free to disagree with them!

    Haaland: 35 games over the season, 30 goals, 5 assists, tends to only get bonus when he scores, so let's say 10x3 bonus and 10x1 bonus 245pts. Captained to 490

    5.5: Sangare is being called "the new Anderson" but doesn't have set pieces. A different 5.5 could emerge. Anderson got 180pts with set pieces. Let's say that a 5.5 defcon machine without set pieces scores 25 less. So 155pts.

    Haaland + 5.5 = 645pts

    Bruno: 35 starts, 8 goals, 15 assists. 5 clean sheets. Going to assume zero defcon from CAM role. Gets bonus more easily than Haaland, even a single assist can give full bonus for him. 5x1, 7x2, 9x3 bonus. 206pts Captained to 412

    Isak: 30 starts (more likely to be rested or taken off early) 20 goals, 5 assists, 10x3 (when he double returns) 5x1 bonus. 190pts

    Bruno + Isak = 602pts

    I was expecting Bruno+Isak to come out better, but doesn't look like it.

    Disclaimers:
    Bruno and Isak gives you Isak as an alternative captain during his better fixtures, adding an unknown amount to their total.

    I have assumed no major injuries. I accept that this is quite an assumption for Isak.

    This is all assuming that the 3.5mil for Haaland over Bruno is all spent on one player. The difference between the two could easily be spread over anything from 1 to 7 other players. I did just one because the maths gets horrendously more complicated for more players involved.

    With WCs and multiple free transfers, you don't need to just sit on one through the whole season, swapping could be best?

    Haaland normally starts like a train and has decent fixtures to start, but missed the start of pre-season for the first time and has a new manager too.

    Bruno doesn't normally start completely on fire, but has amazing starting fixtures.

    Maybe you think Groß scores more than 155 for 5.5 That makes the Haaland combo better. Maybe you think everyone with Bruno would have the best 5.5 anyway (probably true) so the Haaland side actually needs to use the second best 5.5 - hurting the Haaland combined total.

    Any thoughts on all this?

    1. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      1 hour, 27 mins ago

      I was initially firmly on starting Bruno with no Haaland. The style of City's play and particularly how Semenyo looks is making me look more to Haaland. This number crunching is swinging me further to Haaland.

    2. jayzico
      • 15 Years
      1 hour, 18 mins ago

      Haha, naturally you waited to post this on a fresh page/thread. How long did you wait for the new page - just wondering. It takes ages huh.

      1. jayzico
        • 15 Years
        1 hour, 17 mins ago

        I did too. But my team got decimated last night after watching Isak and Tzolis

      2. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        1 hour, 10 mins ago

        Been checking every half hour or so! There have been a lot of articles recently so figured one would be asking fairly soon to be near top of. Got lucky with timing for first post on a new one

        1. jayzico
          • 15 Years
          21 mins ago

          lol. Great stuff mate. Love your post too. I'm dead set on just Haaland(c) until IB

    3. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 hour, 18 mins ago

      Only issue I have with this is time frame of entire season. You can have all 3 as and when they hit their best set of fixtures.

      Those estimates are also kind off what we say over-optimistic. I think only 1 out of them happens.

      Initial phase is all about focusing on decent players with decent fixtures. Once we get some data, we can start projecting scores which usually doesnt work as we expect but atleast thats based on data.

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        56 mins ago

        Agree that I was on the optimistic side, but I tried to be consistently optimistic to keep it as fair as I could. And definitely agree on the fact that you don't need to look at the season as a whole.

        I do think it gives something to think about though, especially for anyone weighing up which of the two to go for if they've decided not to have both.

        Maybe I just have too much time on my hands while not working!

        1. Holmes
          • 12 Years
          24 mins ago

          Its a good approach for draft game. In FPL, I feel everything goes out of window once the first KO whistle is blown.

    4. Pompel
      • 12 Years
      1 hour, 15 mins ago

      Thinking this should be hulked.
      Normally I'd agree with selecting only one of the two, and that would be Haaland. But given initial two fixtures for United, I think I'll start with the two, and then reduce ditch one of them quite soon.
      Should be mentioned that if going with only one of them from the start, I don't think there's a big risk of getting shut out by price increases, due to their already massive ownerships

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        52 mins ago

        Good point on the low likelihood of price rises. Helps jumping back and forth.

        I still think that it's better to only go one of the expensive boys though. eg Neither are as good as Bruno individually, but Cunha+Mbuemo is 0.5 cheaper than Bruno + non-playing-fodder and probably scores more in those fixtures. Although if you want to double defence with Lammens+defender then Bruno looks better as you can't get both of the other mids then

        1. Pompel
          • 12 Years
          42 mins ago

          It's perfectly possible to have Bruno + one of Mbeumo/Cunha + a playing fifth mid, e.g. Gross or even cheaper Nørgaard, even with the standard front three of Haaland + JP + DCL. Means goin a bit lighter in defence ofc, but eg. Mosquera + Gvardiol can still be fit in

          1. 17th Time Lucky
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 5 Years
            28 mins ago

            Agreed, although I still think in this case that there's more upside to be found by losing Bruno and upgrading the defense.

            I guess it's a case of taking both is the safe pick as there's a good chance they'll be two of the top scorers in the first few weeks. But there will definitely be plenty of combinations where spreading the funds scores more, and plenty where it doesn't! I'm personally finding it more fun trying to chase the bigger upside, but I'm appreciating the argument for going both more now.

    5. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      56 mins ago

      I would have just Haaland, but, Bruno.F first 2 is hard to ignore, but after those I agree you only need one for captain reasons, that's when it gets fun spending Bruno money on whoever takes my fancy, Bruno + 1 should look better, but Haaland is just so inevitable

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        26 mins ago

        I think I'm just enjoying the game of trying to anticipate who those better options are in advance and saving the transfers by getting them straight away. Starting to appreciate how going both can be a safer plan at the start though

    6. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      54 mins ago

      Doing something like this seems useful on paper, but then falls apart when you think about spreading funds and using transfers (as you mentioned).

      You can make a really good team with both of them for now, and they could both potentially haul in the first 2 gameweeks, so starting the season without either of them doesn't make sense to me.

      1. fantasyfog
        • 11 Years
        40 mins ago

        Without either! Wouldn't dream of that, has to be at least 1, has to be

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          19 mins ago

          I wrote "without both" at first, but it didn't sound right when I read it back

      2. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        37 mins ago

        I don't disagree with this, but I just feel you can get so much more upside (although admittedly riskier) but not going both.

        If you're locked on Haaland, then you could have (for example)
        Bruno, LeFee, Sarr or
        Mbuemo, Cunha, Semenyo
        And I'd back the second trio to do better

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          32 mins ago

          You could very easily have a combination of those players + Haaland.

          4.5
          5.5 - 4.5 - 4.5 - 4.0 - 4.0
          Bruno - Mbeumo - Semenyo - Sarr - LeFee
          Haaland - Pedro - 4.5

          1. 17th Time Lucky
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 5 Years
            22 mins ago

            Even if you weren't going for an early BB, I wouldn't want that thin a defence. Though I can see how you wouldn't have to lose Bruno to upgrade it. In that example, Sarr>Groß gives 1m to upgrade the back.

            I think going both is a much stronger option if you're not BBing early

    7. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      52 mins ago

      How about Saka and Palmer, or Mbeumo and Rogers, predicting scores is fun, but they'll always let you down, its fantasy football after all, all we have to look forward to is disappointment and rage transfers lol

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        32 mins ago

        Yep, not expecting any of these numbers to be accurate, but if I can be consistently wrong across the board then the logic still holds up!

        Even if everything here ends up being useless, it was still a fun thought exercise

    8. Travel Notes
      • 3 Years
      38 mins ago

      Well thought out and presented.

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        24 mins ago

        Thank you. Don't know how much use any of it will be, but it was fun to think through!

        1. Travel Notes
          • 3 Years
          12 mins ago

          Fun is what it's about.

          1. jacob1989
            • 4 Years
            8 mins ago

            Starting with both. C the guy who plays at home.

    9. Brosstan
      • 11 Years
      24 mins ago

      My issue with this is you are spending all the extra Haaland money on the least valuable position overall, forward, and picking the most expensive option too. Isak probably one of the worst value options in the entire game.

      Meanwhile you fill the Bruno spot with one of the most cost effective slots in the game.

      Its not a fair comparison. The haaland money is much better spent by upgrading several players across the team.

      What you do show quite clearly here is what a poor option Isak is.

      1. 17th Time Lucky
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        8 mins ago

        Very fair points. I went with Isak as I thought that was the player people would be most likely to put in if they didn't go Haaland. Then picked the mid that mathed out to equal cost. If I've helped show that Isak's rubbish then maybe that's something useful from all these ramblings! (Although I've been looking at him since the game opened, and still might get him even if I do go Haaland)

        Completely agree that the money would be best used spread out, but my brain is not in a great place right now too try and put numbers onto those possible permutations!

  2. jayzico
    • 15 Years
    1 hour, 42 mins ago

    Kinsky | Verbruggen

    Cala | Shaw | Maguire | Hume | Davis

    Mbeumo | Semenyo | ELF | Odegaard I Tzolis

    Haaland(c) I JP | Isak

    BB week 1.

    Crazy? Too many risks? HELP.

    1. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      1 hour, 10 mins ago

      all your arsenal players may start but may all come off early

      1. jayzico
        • 15 Years
        25 mins ago

        Funky - would you play Mosq/White over Cala?

        1. Funkyav
          • 17 Years
          just now

          yeah i think so, currently on Mosq but seriously considering white instead/as well as

    2. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      1 hour, 6 mins ago

      It's the Arsenal that would give me thoughts too. I think Tzolis has more potential upside than Odegaard so would change Ode myself. If you for for someone cheaper (Groß? Boring but good) then you could upgrade Davis if you don't want to rely on a promoted defender.

      Some people would say not to hedge your bets with ELF and Davis cancelling each other out, but I personally don't mind that too much

      1. jayzico
        • 15 Years
        46 mins ago

        That's all true guys. Odegaard def my week link. Think I'll downgrade to gross - upgrade Davis (who I really like actually) to Gvardiol.

        Cheers for that and gl to you all

      2. jacob1989
        • 4 Years
        21 mins ago

        Who or what os ELF?

        1. jayzico
          • 15 Years
          19 mins ago

          Le Fee (Sunderland mate)

  3. One Man
    • 9 Years
    1 hour, 40 mins ago

    Who to start GW1? Only need one to start.

    A. Rayan, City (A)
    B. Gomez Villa (H)
    C. Robinson Chelsea (H)

    1. jayzico
      • 15 Years
      1 hour, 17 mins ago

      Ouch. B, just I think

    2. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 hour, 12 mins ago

      B

    3. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      58 mins ago

      B, then A

      ...... then maybe C

  4. GreennRed
    • 14 Years
    1 hour, 24 mins ago

    Mainoo is in Maynooth.

  5. mattyb09
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    1 hour, 13 mins ago

    Anyone else struggling picking defenders?

    I don't see any no-brainer picks.

    1. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      48 mins ago

      Neco.

      1. mattyb09
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        45 mins ago

        Is he worth the 0.5 over Aina?

        1. jayzico
          • 15 Years
          40 mins ago

          In a game that's so unstable and every dime counts (at the start at least) I'd say no.

          I have Gomez, but really prefer Gross. Just can't find that 0.5 (and I've no Bruno)

        2. GreennRed
          • 14 Years
          36 mins ago

          Didn't even know Aina was 4.5m until you said it! Not worth the extra 0.5m if Aina returns to form of e seasons ago.

          1. jayzico
            • 15 Years
            18 mins ago

            Exactly. He was excellent. Now just 4.5

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      48 mins ago

      Feel like all of them have some sort of caveat - price, fixtures, rotation, availability... Should be a recipe for mixed teams, but we can already see somewhat of a template on here

    3. jayzico
      • 15 Years
      45 mins ago

      Maguire (whom I've never really liked) is nailed on for me, as is Shaw.

      1. jayzico
        • 15 Years
        44 mins ago

        And Hume - can't believe how high (supposedly) he plays!

        1. mattyb09
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          36 mins ago

          Yes, I am currently on the somewhat-templatey: Mosquera, Calafiori, Shaw, Aina, Hume.

          Just feel like I am settling for those outdated nailed attacking fullback options because it feels uneasy to spend so heavily on the expensive DEFCON options

          1. jayzico
            • 15 Years
            17 mins ago

            Me: Cala I Gvard I Maguire I Shaw I Hume. Boom

            1. bigbudgie
              • 12 Years
              3 mins ago

              isn't this a massive benching issue for you?

        2. fusen
          • 14 Years
          8 mins ago

          Le Bris seems to love playing him in midfield which was thought to just be a stop gap last season but then he continued doing so even when other normal midfielders returned from injury and AFCON.

          Normal backline is Reinildo, Alderette, Ballard, Mukiele with Mukiele taking Humes traditional right back spot. But as above, Le Bris keeps wanting to play Hume and so puts him on the right wing.

          There is no guarantee this will continue but he seems to be a favourite of Le Bris even when fans groin at the lineup

      2. fantasyfog
        • 11 Years
        19 mins ago

        Slab head would be in mine if I didn't have 2 attackers and the cheaper Shaw, decent pick early doors, will have a point to prove after world cup snub, always a threat on corners

    4. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      26 mins ago

      Yeah me neither, helps in a way as money can go elsewhere, there will obviously be options that become apparent as the season gets under way

    5. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      24 mins ago

      I feel like there aren't currently any great picks, but a lot of good or pretty good. Personally I like the diversity that will hopefully bring

  6. Powers106
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 hour, 6 mins ago

    Okay maybe it’s a little aggressive but while not my plan, maybe a BB in GW2? Thoughts?

    Verbruggen (Kinsky)
    Calafiori - Gvardiol - Shaw (Thomas - Van Ewijk)
    Bruno - Mbeumo - Gross - Sadiki (Yarmoliuk)
    JP - Isak - Haaland c

    1. Bobby Digital
      • 8 Years
      20 mins ago

      Looks strong. A bit weak in the midfield, but that's what you get by going Bruno, Haaland and Isak.

    2. bigbudgie
      • 12 Years
      1 min ago

      I would drop Isak to a £6m and spend more in midfield - just personal preference. If Isak goes off you'll look like a genius 🙂

  7. Bobby Digital
    • 8 Years
    1 hour ago

    Arsenal still shopping for a LW... Tzolis definitely a transfer waiting to happen. Would you go Sarr instead and save a transfer down the line?

    1. mattyb09
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      22 mins ago

      That may be true, but for now he is the most in-form ARS attacking option (slim-pickings) who is quality.

    2. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      17 mins ago

      I think if you're going BB1 (so have a decent bench) or WC4 then it's worth the risk as he's looking like shaping up great against Coventry.

      For a long term pick he feels very much like Trossard was, and however good he may have been on paper, none of us ever got him.

      1. fantasyfog
        • 11 Years
        6 mins ago

        Trossard at Brighton was a good pick

  8. jacob1989
    • 4 Years
    46 mins ago

    Who is a good early season punt? Isak or foden? If isak, drop i thiago or j pedro?

    1. Bobby Digital
      • 8 Years
      30 mins ago

      Isak, drop Thiago

      1. Funkyav
        • 17 Years
        just now

        only if Isak is on pens imo

        Otherwise I think i actually prefer Thiago who we know will play 90 and is on pens.

    2. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      30 mins ago

      Pfft Foden, I can't even contemplate Foden unless I see something that tells me otherwise, him and Wirtz are traps I'm sure of it

      So Isak

  9. bigbudgie
    • 12 Years
    40 mins ago

    Hello legends

    A quick RMT with £1.5 in the bank, what would you do to improve

    Kinsky/Palmer
    Gvardiol/Shaw/Ajer/Vuskovic/Van Ewijk
    Fruno/Mbuemo/Tzolis/Le Fee/Rudoni
    Haaland/JP/DCL

    Just took Foden out for Tzolis because 3 City/3 United is not good, wanted some Arsenal cover at least for COV

    1. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 12 Years
      4 mins ago

      Le fée to wirtz for me

  10. Freshy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    31 mins ago

    Last preseason Estêvão was the best Chelsea forward and it wasn't close. Straight into my GW1 team. Tzolis seems similar yet not as electric as Estêvão was. Dowman also was superb last year in preseason.

    1. bigbudgie
      • 12 Years
      5 mins ago

      is he nailed though

    2. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      1 min ago

      estevao only gets a place if we play 4 at the back and even then he is competing with Neto

  11. Zoostation
    • 12 Years
    11 mins ago

    Appreciate any feedback on this BB for GW1…

    Lammens Verbruggen

    Mosquera N Matheus Kerkez Shaw O’Brien

    Semenyo Mbeumo KDH Wirtz Gross

    Haaland Pedro DCL

    1. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      3 mins ago

      Looks good. Kerkez and Wirtz risks for me, don't like the look of them tbh

  12. fantasyfog
    • 11 Years
    11 mins ago

    What are people expecting from wirtz and foden this season, that is different to last season?

    1. Zoostation
      • 12 Years
      4 mins ago

      Wirtz is playing in the 10 seems rejuvenated with new coach, system etc..

      He’s talented and looked good yesterday, positive pre season. Second year in the league so should be more settled.

      Foden I have not given much thought. I know he’s been discussed as a “pillar” of the team, but with how Semenyo has looked would imagine more people are going there.