634x258 Scout Notes
22 December 2015 1853 comments
James Barnes James Barnes
Share:

Theo Walcott and Olivier Giroud grab a goal apiece as Arsenal defeat City at the Emirates. Mesut Ozil provides a pair of assists and has now produced points in 11 successive Gameweeks. Sergio Aguero lasts just over an hour for the beaten visitors, with Yaya Toure’s late strike proving scant consolation.

Ozil Guides Gunners to Victory

Arsenal moved to within two points of the summit by way of a 2-1 home win over fellow title-chasers Manchester City at the Emirates last night. Mesut Ozil delivered attacking returns for the 11th Gameweek in succession, turning provider for both of the Gunners’ goals. The Germany international has now amassed an incredible 15 assists in 16 league outings, positioning him seven clear of Gerard Deulofeu (eight assists) on the distribution front.

Theo Walcott set the tone for the hosts with a searing strike in 33rd minute, while Olivier Giroud doubled their advantage with his seventh goal in as many matches – illuminating the wealth of viable routes into Arsenal’s attack. Aaron Ramsey didn’t trouble the scoreboard at the Emirates but was the only midfielder among his team to card a shot inside the box (three), illustrating his penchant for late runs into the area.

Given that the north Londoners enjoy two favourable home ties (BOU, NEW) beyond a trip to Southampton, the Gunners’ chief protagonists look well placed to perpetuate their purple patch. Only Everton (eight) have shipped more goals than the Saints (seven) during the last four Gameweeks, while Bournemouth and Newcastle United rank joint-second for goals conceded (32) this term, which bodes well for Arsenal’s attacking prospects.

After the match, Arsene Wenger admitted that Ozil had struggled with illness for most of the week, and with Alexis Sanchez suffering a minor setback to his hamstring injury, the Gunners boss is keen to court caution with his players’ fitness:

“He (Ozil) had a chest infection for the week and was in bed. He had only one training session yesterday and for a guy who could not prepare well he has done very well physically. I’m a bit cautious because we have lost three or four players recently so I have to be cautious a little bit….He (Sanchez) had had a slight one (setback)… he planned to be on the bench tonight but he is so keen he got a little bit of a pain and we didn’t take a gamble. I think he will be back January 10. Christmas period – you can’t count him.”

City’s Away Woes Continue

Save for a 15-minute spell at the end of the encounter – inspired by Yaya Toure’s languid strike – Manchester City looked short of ideas, culminating in their third defeat in five fixtures. Toure has served up attacking returns (two goals and one assist) in three of the last six Gameweeks but looks a far cry from the dominant Fantasy asset that chalked up 20 goals and nine assists during the 2013/14 campaign.

The travails of Manuel Pellegrini’s troops in the final third are denoted by the fact they failed to register a solitary big chance and rank second-bottom for big chances (three) across the last four Gameweeks. Indeed, Kevin De Bruyne’s 27% ownership have suffered in the form of three successive blanks, while the 3,409 early Sergio Aguero adopters were left scratching their heads as the rusty Argentine mustered just two attempts against Arsenal before being withdrawn just after the hour-mark.

After the match, Manuel Pellegrini conceded that Aguero – who played for just the third time since Gameweek 8 last night – is far from full match sharpness right now:

“I think that it was important for Sergio to return to the team. Maybe he needs a few more matches to return to his form but it was important for the team that he played tonight”.

Notwithstanding the scoreline, Bacary Sagna scooped three bonus points by virtue of his assist and defensive efforts. Speaking of the Sky Blues rearguard, they’ve now conceded in five consecutive league clashes and recorded just two shut-outs in the past 12 Gameweeks. It’s safe to say that Vincent Kompany’s stock has risen immeasurably over the past two months, while the Fantasy appeal of Man City’s other rearguard starters has diminished considerably.

Ultimately, Sunderland’s visit this weekend will act at a litmus test to ascertain the extent of Man City’s malaise before they travel to Leicester and Watford – given that they’ve picked up just two points from their last five away fixtures, scoring twice along the way, some Fantasy managers will be thinking twice over loading up on the Etihad outfit right now.

  1. Gooner97
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Matches Alexis Sanchez will miss through injury:
    Southampton (A)
    Bournemouth (H)
    Newcastle (H)
    Sunderland [FA Cup](H)
    Campbell is going to get a really good run here.. Hoping for speedy recovery of Sanchez..

  2. nobwak
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Sorry, bottomed...

    Does anyone else think that the way that price changes in FPL work is, well, unfair?
    Why do you only get half of a price INCREASE, but when a players price DECREASES, you feel it immediately? Surely it should work the same in both directions.

    Case in point - Mahrez.
    Say that you got Mahrez on week one, and now all of a sudden he gets injured for 6 weeks. If you take him out, you can no way afford to get him back once he's fit again, whereas somebody who got him in a week ago can not only afford to get him back later, but can also afford to replace him with somebody better than you. Therefore, surely you're being hindered and punished for being ahead of the game, whilst bandwagon jumpers have an advantage - the game rewards a fickle attitude and doesn't reward people who ACTUALLY KNOW THEIR STUFF, not well enough anyway.

    Thoughts?

    1. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      But those that got on early with Mahrez have more money...

      1. Iceball
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        This

      2. nobwak
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        They have more money yes, but if you buy Mahrez when he's worth 6.0, and he's now worth 7.0... then you only have 6.5 to replace him with, and finding a Mahrez replacement with that cash is pretty impossible. Someone who just got him can replace him with a 7.0 player, which is still difficult but a little easier. Having both sold the same player, shouldn't both have the same amount to reinvest? Doesn't make sense to me. A players value should be consistent regardless of who's selling/buying him IMO.

        Also, my point still stands that when he's fit again, you can't afford to get him back as easily as somebody who just hopped on the bandwagon and only had him for a week or two. Seems a bit unfair.

        I agree that people will have missed out on a hell of a lot of points, that is very valid.

        My main gripe is that it doesn't work in the same way when players prices FALL. Why shouldn't it?
        I can't get away from the feeling that the game tries to prevent good players from dominating too much, with this price rise/fall system.

        1. Doolittle
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          But you'll have spent that money that you have by getting Mahrez more cheaply. It's not like you've got less money, you've got more - you've probably just spent it.

          1. nobwak
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Lets just address these 2 points, as I think they're the most important.

            - Having both sold the same player, shouldn't both have the same amount to reinvest?

            - It doesn't work in the same way when players prices FALL. Why shouldn't it?

            1. M00N
              • 10 Years
              10 years, 13 hours ago

              Okay so you buy him for 6m and I buy him for 6.8m
              you have 0.8 in the bank then you sell him for 6.5m and have 7.3 in the bank where as I Sell for 6.9 and have 7.3 in the bank but a lot less points

              1. Camp No No
                • 12 Years
                10 years, 13 hours ago

                Actually, you would only have 6.9 ITB. So, the one who bought Mahrez earlier is better of money wise.

              2. Camp No No
                • 12 Years
                10 years, 12 hours ago

                Let's clarify this once more.

                Manager A buys player x for 6.0.
                Manager B buys player x for 6.8.

                Other things being equal, Manager A has 0.8 more to invest to his team.

                Both sell the player when his value is 7.0.

                Manager A will have 6.5 + 0.8 = 7.3 to invest.
                Manager B will have 6.9 to invest.

                Manager A thus has 0.4 more to invest to the replacement for player x.

                1. nobwak
                  • 10 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  Surely manager A has 0.4 more to invest in his team, as this is all that he's gained from Mahrez's sale?

                  1. Fitzy.
                    • 14 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    He spent 0.8 less of his cash to get player x in the first place and he gets 50% of it to spend.

                    1. Fitzy.
                      • 14 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      Sorry, 0.8 + 50% of 1.0 profit to spend.

                2. GreenWindmill
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  THIS!!!

                  Thank you for making this point very clearly. This 'price rises hurt the early adopters' argument comes up every year and infuriates me every time!

                  1. nobwak
                    • 10 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    He should get 100% of it to spend. I don't see how this wouldn't be better.

                    1. GreenWindmill
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      Per our discussion below - without a 50% profit rule the team values would be out of control. People would make millions in a single week and warp the game.

                      1. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        "Good players would smash it too hard", basically.

                      2. GreenWindmill
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 14 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Only if you define "good players" as people who want to exploit the price change rules to get ahead rather than try to pick a good team.

                        The system wouldn't reward astutely picking the best fantasy options, it would reward adopting a stock market approach to grossly inflate your bank and then having 20% more budget than people who want to play a fantasy football game.

                      3. John t penguin
                        • 11 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        every year there are a group of people who aim to get highest team value and take loads of hits
                        I think it would end up suiting them more, in that they would take a lot less hits cause they can just ride price increases rather than jumping about.
                        we would end up with people just playing the money rather than the game and not having any real strategy or risk

                      4. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Surely the money game and real game are linked very closely. If you identify good assets in terms of points, early on, then you will reap the benefits in terms of cash later... especially if you get 100% profit.

                      5. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Right now, I don't want to sell Mahrez, because he's a good fantasy player, I don't care what he's worth.
                        I will, however, care what he's worth if he breaks his leg.

        2. Kvothe
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          Everybody starts with 100m, so the 'good' ones, still has advantage. Thats why you save some money ITB, and why you have a wildcard.

        3. Camp No No
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          You do realize that that second guy also paid 1.0 more for Mahrez?

          the point about price drops is fair though.

    2. John Nerdelbaum
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      those without mahrez would have missed out on a helluva lot of points

      1. Ten Season Wonder
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        spot on. ^

      2. nobwak
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Lets just address these 2 points, as I think they're the most important.

        - Having both sold the same player, shouldn't both have the same amount to reinvest?

        - It doesn't work in the same way when players prices FALL. Why shouldn't it?

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          1. The player who got on early with Mahrez has more to invest

          2. The person that got on early can take 2 falls before losing money potentially. The one that got on at current price will lose 0.1m every time he falls.

          1. nobwak
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            1: The player who got Mahrez early has more to invest in his team as a whole, yes, But from the sale of Mahrez, they definitely get less, You make a profit, I appreciate that, but the amount that you instantly get from selling Mahrez in undeniably less. This is stupid - we are both selling the same thing at the same time, therefore we should get the same for it.

            2: Really? I was under the impression that price falls take instant effect?

            1. andy85wsm
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 12 hours ago

              1. You can't just ignore the profit. It's a big deal.

              2. It depends. If I buy Mahrez at 7.1m and he falls to 7 I lose 0.1m If I buy him at 6.8 and he rises to 7.1 and falls to 7.0 I still have 6.9 when I sell him.

          2. Chenku╰☆╮
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            This...u got .5 for mahrez and decided to spend the other money elsewhere... so in essence you mismanaged if you are stuck with 0ITB right now and have no flexibility. This means you either have a rich defense or ave 5+3 playing forwards (no cheapies)...

        2. Ten Season Wonder
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          Lets just address this point;

          Manager A spends £5.5m on Mahrez in GW1...

          Manager B spends £7m on Mahrez this week. He is immediately £1.5m down on funds compared to Manager A.

          Simple enough for you to understand?

          1. Camp No No
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            ^this.

          2. Fitzy.
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Doubt it. Let him just address another point... 😉

          3. nobwak
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Yes obviously I understand that, but what I don't understand is why when manager A & B sell Mahrez at the exact same time, manager A should get less funds for him than manager B. Surely manager A should be allowed to sell the same player as manager B, and be presented with the same options in terms of a replacement, no?

            The most frustrating part is that when players prices fall it doesn't work in the same way -
            Manager A buys player X for 5.0, manager B buys him for 4.8. Player X's price falls to 4.5.. both can sell for 4.5. Surely, in the interest of fairness, within the system that we currently have, manager A should be able to sell for 4.7?!

            1. Camp No No
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 12 hours ago

              Because he has fecking invested a lot less money on him!!!

              1. nobwak
                • 10 Years
                10 years, 12 hours ago

                Yeah, which is good management, being ahead of the grain and knowing about lesser-known players (potentially, could obviously just be luck). Surely this should be rewarded, and not effectively punished?

                Say you follow the Championship, so you know about Ighalo before he appears on MOTD scoring a hatful of goals - I think that you should be better rewarded for your sound football knowledge and your great decision to take a punt on him.. not left with less cash than a bandwagon jumper if he snaps his ACL and you both need to replace him.

                1. nobwak
                  • 10 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  What about price falls?

                2. Camp No No
                  • 12 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  It is rewarded, when the player's price rises, he can sell the player for profit. It is not punished in anyway, he ends up better of than the one who bought the player later in every possible way.

                  1. nobwak
                    • 10 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    Not every possible way, As I've already said - you're not given the same array of options when it comes to replacements. Which is the most important part - 'cause lets face it, you're not going to want to sell a player as in-form as Mahrez unless he gets a serious injury. At which point GW1 Mahrez owners have 6.2 to play with, whilst people who bought him last week have 7.0 to play with, whilst both are aiming to replace the same player.

                    It should at least work in the same way with price falls man.

                    1. Camp No No
                      • 12 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      As it has been explained to you, the manager who bought a player for a cheaper price is given a _greater_ array of options when it comes to replacements - ceteris paribus. If he decides to spend that to more than one player, by for example investing the money ITB before selling the said player, then that's his own decision.

                      1. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        It hasn't been explained to me.

                        Look:

                        Manager A and Manager B both have 0.0 ITB.
                        Manager A purchased Mahrez for 6.0. Manager B purchased him for 7.0.
                        Mahrez snaps his ACL, and is out for the rest of the season, Both players need an immediate replacement.
                        Manager A can only buy a player worth 6.5, manager B can buy a player worth 7.0.
                        Assuming that neither are willing to take a hit... how on gods earth does manager A have a greater array of options?

                    2. John t penguin
                      • 11 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      struggling to see why you cant understand
                      how about we both have 7.0

                      I buy him at 6.2 then sell him at 6.5
                      you buy him at 7 and sell him at 7

                      I then have 6.5 plus the 0.8 I didnt spent at start= 7.3
                      you have 7

                      so I have 7.3 to spend now

                      1. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Struggling to see why just buying/selling players at their current market value wouldn't be a better system?

            2. Fitzy.
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 12 hours ago

              You're contradicting yourself now - in the above scenario, what if manager B brought him first? Why should manager A get to sell him for more than he is worth?

              1. nobwak
                • 10 Years
                10 years, 12 hours ago

                Because thats the way it works when prices rise - you sell for less than the player is currently worth, thats my point.

                Basically, what I'm trying to say, is that all players should be bought and sold at their current market value, i think that this makes far more sense and don't see how it can be disputed to be honest.

                1. Fitzy.
                  • 14 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  You seem to be advocating different things in different posts...

                  "Basically, what I'm trying to say, is that all players should be bought and sold at their current market value"

                  "Player X's price falls to 4.5.....Surely, in the interest of fairness...manager A should be able to sell for 4.7?!"

                  1. nobwak
                    • 10 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    Yeah that is true.

                    "Basically, what I'm trying to say, is that all players should be bought and sold at their current market value" - this is in an ideal world.

                    "Player X's price falls to 4.5.....Surely, in the interest of fairness...manager A should be able to sell for 4.7?!" - This is within the current market system, including the stupid price rises system.

                2. John t penguin
                  • 11 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  the reason fpl do it is to stop someone having crazy amount of money
                  people could end up with 130 mill to spend on a WC if they like. Which doesn't really matter when there are so many cheap players doing well

                  1. Camp No No
                    • 12 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    Exactly.

                  2. John t penguin
                    • 11 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    but would matter if all the big players were performing and
                    someone has
                    4 big defenders
                    sanchez, hazard, silva, ozil, kdb
                    aguero, costa, giroud

                    1. nobwak
                      • 10 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      Yeah exactly.

                      It only doesn't matter because the big hitters aren't performing.
                      If they were, I'd be pissed if I had to replace Mahrez with Redmond whilst a late adopter can replace him with Henderson.

                      1. John t penguin
                        • 11 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        you are still refusing to acknowledge the money you had at start.
                        as I said player A buying at 6.2 and player B buying at 7, gives player A 0.3 more money.
                        If they chose at some point to invest that elsewhere that would allow them to have a better player than player B in that position

                    2. John t penguin
                      • 11 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      the argument could be well they deserve it for building up their bank, but what will happen is loads of people will stop playing.

                      why don't you just think of it as an agents fee

                    3. Camp No No
                      • 12 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      Exactly.Ideally, if the big hitters actually lived up to their names, it should be difficult for everybody to get all of them.

                  3. nobwak
                    • 10 Years
                    10 years, 12 hours ago

                    This. I 100% agree.

                    This translates to:
                    "some people will smash it too hard, and will have way too much of an advantage if we reward them too much for getting it right from the off, rather than just hopping on a bandwagon"

                    1. GreenWindmill
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      No, the £130m crew would be made up exclusively by bandwagon hoppers.

                      1. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Depends how early they get on the bandwagon.
                        The people that would benefit most would be those that anticipated the bandwagon, not those that join the bandwagon.

                      2. GreenWindmill
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 14 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        But anticipating the bandwagon is just a matter of looking at price change sites once a day - it requires no football knowledge.

                      3. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        I'm mean even ahead of that stage of the bandwagon anticipation.
                        I mean actually watching football, seeing a player perform well but not get many returns, and thinking "he's about to go off the chain", and being right about it.
                        I mean watching the Championship and knowing that Charlie Austin and Troy Deeney are great players and likely to attract attention, knowing about them before the MOTD brigade.
                        I do not mean checking price change websites daily.

                      4. GreenWindmill
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 14 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        I know what you mean but that group of players can't be rewarded for price increases and somehow avoid rewarding the managers who check when a player is due to rise in price.

                        The group of managers you describe already have the edge through gaining points and price rises today.

                    2. John t penguin
                      • 11 Years
                      10 years, 12 hours ago

                      fair point, but as I said loads of people would stop playing.
                      the only example I can give is when the sun dream team allowed people to own unlimited teams, there were loads of people spent a fortune getting teams that covered every option so they could win the weekly and monthly prizes.
                      What actually happened was most of the casual players stopped playing.

                      1. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Thanks, i'm glad that you see my point.
                        I agree that loads of people will stop playing too, thats a very good point and kind of what I'm suggesting myself. Very good players would dominate, basically.

                      2. John t penguin
                        • 11 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        which they tend to do anyway
                        good players adapt to the system and identify the edges over others.

                      3. nobwak
                        • 10 Years
                        10 years, 12 hours ago

                        Don't get me wrong, I love this game, and like to think that I am good player I just think that it has it's flaws.

                3. Pasqualinho
                  • 16 Years
                  10 years, 12 hours ago

                  I still don't agree - and I've read everyone's replies and your comments. I get that you want to be rewarded more for being an early adopter - but, according to the rules - being a late adopter is a legitimate tactic also, for the reasons you mention. People should be rewarded if they get this right, too.

    3. RobbieCivage
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 9 hours ago

      Mate I'm with you 100%

      I got Mahrez at the beginning of the game and he is worth 6.2 million in my team, but if I had to get rid through injury I would effectively lose 0.8 million if I wanted to put him back in again. When players increase in value it's not money in the bank.

      It's exactly the same with Ozil, had him since week 1 as well!

      I feel like I have a greedy financial advisor who collects 50% of my investment returns for doing bugger all!

      As much as I can boast about being so awesome I had Mahrez and Hazard from week 1, my other survivor from week 1 is Eden Hazard 🙁

      1. nobwak
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 8 hours ago

        Thank you, I'm glad that at least one person can see that I'm not completely insane. 🙂

        1. nobwak
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 8 hours ago

          Your Ozil example is a perfect one actually, an even better example than Mahrez.
          If he gets injured for the rest of the season now you have less money to replace him with than people that only just got him. You'll have to look at the likes of Coutinho and Eriksen, whilst others will maybe be able to stretch to someone closer to 10.0.
          It's grade A bullshlacker.

          1. RobbieCivage
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 3 hours ago

            I've only just looked at all the other replies as well and I genuinely don't understand why everyone is insisting you don't have a completely valid point!

            In what walk of the investment game are you not allowed to sell your investment at the current market value?

            I wonder if these people would buy shares in a company in year 1 and then except a 50% deduction of their capital gain when they decide to sell, even if a load of people who bought shares in year 3 are only getting a 10% deduction simply because they paid more for the shares! What the actual!?

  3. AK ⭐
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    This season is the prime example of how we put ahead the name of the club/player over an in-form but unpopular club/player.

    Time we realized it's all about form surely?

  4. andy85wsm
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Last time Aguero was a thing I got on and it was a disaster.

    Now everyone wants to jump on and I'm thinking of steering clear....Another disaster?

    1. AK ⭐
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Didn't look sharp last night Andy. I am staying clear for a while. I don't know if he'd be able to play 3 PL games inside a week.

      1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Pelle said he couldn't do it last time he came back . He played him in three games anyway and then he got injured again .

        1. AK ⭐
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          So has he learnt his lesson or has he not?

          1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Only Pelle knows that 🙂

    2. Bolivian Seaman
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      It's so hard to call, it makes my brain hurt

    3. Optimus.
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Are we talking football here?

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Nah, Fantasy Football.

      2. John Nerdelbaum
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        lol

      3. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Well, Mr. Burns had done it, The Power Plant had won it, With Roger Clemens clucking all the while, Mike Scioscia's tragic illness made us smile, While Wade Boggs lay unconscious on the bar-room tile. Chorus: We're talkin' softball, From Maine to San Diego, Talkin' softball, Mattingly and Canseco, Ken Griffey's grotesquely swollen jaw, Steve Sax and his run-in with the law, We're talkin' Homer, Ozzie and the Straw.

        1. Optimus.
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          😆

        2. Doolittle
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          Well well, Steve Sax, from New York City.

          I heard some guy got killed in New York City and they never solved the case. But you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you, Steve?

          But there are hundreds of unsolved murders in New York City.

          You don't know when to keep your mouth shut, do you, Saxy Boy?

          1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            😆

          2. John Nerdelbaum
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Haha brilliant both of you 🙂

          3. Optimus.
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            😆

    4. EmreCan Hustle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Next three fixtures are deceptively tricky. Leicester and Watford aren't easy games. He should start and they'll have to outscore both teams.

      1. Tabasco
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Leicester isn't an easy game but it's easy to score against them

    5. Gooner97
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      I wouldn't really like to sell Kane Lukaku or Igloo

    6. drughi
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      He doesn't look that sharp but it is sunderland so who knows. Aguero don't have to be in form to bang in 3 goals

    7. PlayPercentage
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Kun may not even start the next game.
      He may be saved for the Leicester game.

    8. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      swerve

  5. Gooner97
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    DDG (Henn)
    Moreno Bellerin Dawson (Bertrand, Simpson)
    Ozil Mahrez Coutinho Barkley (Tettey)
    Lukaku Kane Ighalo

    1FT, £7.6ITB

    A) Bertand to Toby
    B) Coutinho to a City mid (no City cover vs SUN)
    C) Tettey to a City mid and play AOA.
    D) Kane to Kun
    E) Other

    What do you think folks?
    Cheers

    1. _Gunner
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      B
      mind helping me below

    2. Kvothe
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Lukaku-> Aguero feels crazy?

    3. Khal Drogba
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Tetty to silva or Walcott

  6. RangerMouse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    I have been very happy with Ighalo, got me many points, but is now the time to get rid, with the current run of fixtures?

    I have 6million to spend and 2 free transfers, so I could get Aguero in, but maybe wait and see how things go at Man U? They have a decent set of fixtures, but while LVG is in charge, the attacking returns will remain low.

    What options would you consider? My current front 7 with Gosling on the bench are:

    Ozil - Silva - Coutinho - Mahrez
    Kane - Lukaku - Ighalo

    Want Kane and Lukaku a bit longer, with decent fixtures in the next two GW's. Any help deciding what to do next?

    1. EmreCan Hustle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Keep Ighalo. Replace Coutinho with an Arsenal mid.

    2. drughi
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Well I'm keeping. Bought at 5.0 so I can't find better value and it's a great enabler if you want aguero/sanchez along with expensive defenders

  7. _Gunner
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Current team: 1FT, 1.8 itb

    Butland Schmeicel
    Kolarov Toby Moreno Francis Saylor*
    Yaya Wijnaldum Mahrez Mane' Hazard*
    Kane Vardy Lukaku

    my thoughts, Hazard > KDB this Gameweek, Mane > Ramsey for Gameweek 19.

    Any other thoughts lads?
    Thanks

    1. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 12 hours ago

      Saylor out ASAP

  8. PlayPercentage
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    What are KdB owners doing? It's a lot of money tied up in someone who is under-performing.

    1. Optimus.
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      He's staying this gw that's all I know

    2. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Looked dangerous last night, I'm keeping for now (last time I sold him was for 1 week and he got 16 points, so I'm wary).

    3. boredjames
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Not getting rid before Sunderalnd, that's for sure

    4. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Definitely keeping. He's always in the heart of a strong City attack.

      If he ever becomes a problem I'll just switch to Silva.

  9. Piggs Boson
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Aguero after 5 minutes playing Sunderland: https://media3.giphy.com/media/q9HHyHPISNZD2/giphy.gif

    1. Gooner97
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Cattermole FTW

    2. Jigger & Pony
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Or that's us hitting the couch when Kun scores after 5 mins

    3. Optimus.
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      😀 I love them episodes when that scene goes on for 10 minutes 😆

    4. drughi
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      either that or 2 goals already

  10. Jigger & Pony
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Doing Morgan > Bellerin and Mane > Walcott for 2FTs good move?

    Butland Hennessey
    Alderweireld Dawson Moreno PvA Morgan*
    Mahrez Ozil KdB Mane* Ayew*
    Kane Vardy Lukaku

    Tons of money itb.

  11. internal error
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    If I sheep kdb to Barkley and Kane to Ighalo, am I likely to make ground on top 10k?

    1. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      given that I already have Ozil, Luke, Vardy, Mahrez

    2. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      I wouldn't sell KDB for Barkley? Great fixture next GW and Barkleys are getting tougher.

  12. AK ⭐
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    I want Ighalo, but I am definitely not losing Lukaku or Vardy for him, and Kane has a good fixture against Norwich at home, with Dembele back..

    Maybe next week..

    1. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      I'm stuck, the stats comparison of him vs Giroud is just a demolition, but Giroud's next 2 fixtures...

      1. Doolittle
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        *2 after this week I mean

        1. AK ⭐
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          There's Giroud too, but then I already have 3 Arsenal players so I'll have to pass on him.

          Ighalo's making life difficult each week.

          1. Doolittle
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            I have Giroud already, he's causing a problem in that I want to do Coutinho to Ramsey, but can't do that without losing an Arsenal player (Bellerin, Ozil, Giroud). Ighalo is punishing.

    2. Bolivian Seaman
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      I've had iggy most of the season, this is the first time I want to get rid of him. He's had some really good fixtures

      1. AK ⭐
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        I had him in the past too and I got rid for Vardy after his brace against Arsenal.

        It hasn't been bad, but he is just so consistent.

  13. Evasivo
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    Most likely to use atleast 1 of the 2 FTs on defence, Ivanovic Dann Ward all on my watchlist.

    Gomes
    Cresswell Francis PJones
    KDB Ozil Wijnaldum Mahrez
    Ighalo Vardy Lukaku

    Schmeichel Moreno Kolerov Westwood
    2FT & £7.1ITB

    Which defenders need to go first? I guess either PJones or Francis?

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Jones IMO

      1. Evasivo
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Perhaps Jones to Ivanovic is the move

  14. FPL Blow-In
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    With Evertons fixtures getting tougher is Lukaku the fall out guy of our Lukaku, Vardy, Kane, Ighalo front lines?

    Is Mane and Lukaku to Walcott and Aguero mad for a hit?

    1. AK ⭐
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      It definitely seems mad. Lukaku has scored in 7 games consecutively and he just seems like adding to the tally. Mane to Walcott is okay.

      1. FPL Blow-In
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Along with the fact Aguero is not 100% and has 3 games in one week. That fixture seems so good on paper it's making the decision tough.

        1. AK ⭐
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          It is and they looked horrific against Chelsea. I am tempted too, but he just doesn't look sharp enough. The turns seemed heavy.

          1. FPL Blow-In
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            I agree Sunderland were awful. The lure of Aguero is mighty tempting. The only way I can afford him for free is by selling Kane though and NOR seems like just a good a game on paper.

        2. Sterling Chap
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 10 hours ago

          Butland
          Kolarov Monreal Dawson
          Bolasie Mahrez Özil De KDB
          Vardy Kane Lukaku
          Subs: McCarthy Mané Moreno Francis
          2FT // 1.7 ITB

          A) Mané > Walcott (bench Bolassie for this coming GW)
          B) Other idea...

          1. Sterling Chap
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 10 hours ago

            Reply fail

    2. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Selling a man on a 7 game scoring streak, for a man who can't get through an hour without getting injured, who has no form, who went off with a knock last night, for a hit. The things Aguero does to one's mind...

      1. FPL Blow-In
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Yeah such high risk of course. But how high is the ceiling?

        1. Doolittle
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          This is the logic I had when I WCed 3 weeks ago to do KDB and Vardy to Lanzini and Aguero. At that point I was 11k, I'm now 52k. Beware the lure of siren Aguero...

          1. FPL Blow-In
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            Yeah. Sunderland looked so bad though... If Kane, Vardy and Lukaku all do well next GW it won't do me any good with their ownership. Ighalo is killing me. Aguero is 12% ownership could be a big jump if he hits a double figure

  15. LewanGOALski
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    2 FTs
    over 8 mln in the bank

    what should I do..?

    A. Ayew ➡ Walcott
    B. Eriksen ➡ Walcott
    C. Kane ➡ Lukaku
    B. A/B + C

    ??

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Why C?

    2. Gooner97
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      B

    3. TheFootballHub
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      who are you other strikers

    4. Painter
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      B and C

  16. TheFootballHub
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 13 hours ago

    mane > who

    1. Vman
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Rambo

      1. TheFootballHub
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        got him

      2. TheFootballHub
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        I'm think either willian or bolasie

    2. Gooner97
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Anyone

    3. Optimus.
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      don't get who

  17. Worzel Gummidge
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      ?Play Sterling or use FT to get in Walcott?

      1. TheFootballHub
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        get walcott in

      2. Emp
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        play sterling

    • Painter
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Coutinho to Walcott for a hit?

      1. TheFootballHub
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        nah

      2. Gooner97
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Not for a hit

    • internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Just checked my bank balance. The boss made sure alcohol was free all night and it ended so I could get the tube home for around £2 on my Oyster. I somehow bought a £103 round and paid £50 for a cab home. So typical of me when I'm drunk

      1. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        for my xmas do on friday

      2. Optimus.
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Good times 😀 My work do was Friday and I didn't spend a penny, got my bro to collect me and then end of the night also 🙂

      3. John Nerdelbaum
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        was your work do @ barings bank?

      4. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        The alcohol was free and you bought a £103 round?!

        That's impressive 🙂

        1. Optimus.
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 12 hours ago

          Sounds like someone finished off the night in a strip joint 😉

      5. John Nerdelbaum
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        did you actually go to the work do?

    • Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      @ Doolittle

      Shall we reprise your assertion that not buying a back-up to Coquelin last summer was "disastrous"? 😉

      1. Doolittle
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Hahaha, I refer you to this comment that I made on Twitter last night:

        https://twitter.com/JohnOC1991/status/679059499731300352

        At the moment I'm being proven wrong, and I'm delighted because I'm a big admirer of Arsenal and Wenger. The key is that Wenger has adapted his tactics - 2 years ago he'd have tried to take the game to City, had the fullbacks bombing on, and would have been picked off. Now he's happier to absorb pressure and hit on the break. That's the biggest difference, and the main reason they always used to be "close but no cigar".

        However, I really did think they'd struggle without Coquelin, and so far I'm wrong!

        1. John Nerdelbaum
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          I thought you were older?

          1. Doolittle
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            24, I just seem like a grumpy old man.

            1. Camp No No
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 13 hours ago

              One easily seems old here.

    • You've got red on you.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      2FT and 0.6 ITB. I was set on Vardy and KDB ---> Aguero and Alli but now I think I may leave them.

      Butland - McCarthy

      Kolorov - Moreno - Smalling - Francis - Souare

      Hazard - KDB - Ozil - Mahrez - Stanislas

      Kane - Vardy - Lukaku

      1. Vman
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Stan>Ali

        1. You've got red on you.
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          not enough dolllar

    • DJfresh
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Finally getting rid of hazard but who to :

      A) kdb
      B) Silva
      C) bolasie
      D) Ramsey
      E) sterling

      Rest of attack is ozil, mahrez, coutinho, alli
      Lukaku, vardy, kane

      1. HNI
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Kdb/silva

    • Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Which is more important?

      Kane > Ighalo (other forwards are Vardy and Lukaku)

      Schmeichel > Henessey (DDG is other GK)

      thanks

      1. TheFootballHub
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        neither seem that important, kane is doing alright whereas ighalo has a hard set of fixtures coming up and DDG has stoke next week which could possibly be a CS

        1. Boris Bodega
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 13 hours ago

          United look all at sea to me.

          1. TheFootballHub
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 13 hours ago

            yeah true, DDG hasn't been up to his world class standard lately

      2. Gooner97
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        2

      3. Vman
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Neither

    • Gooner97
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Would you sell DDG or play Hennessey?

      1. Vman
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Latter

    • TheFootballHub
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      bolasie or willian

      1. KANEGAROO
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        willy

      1. Gooner97
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        😀

    • Burger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Current lineup for this week :

      Butland
      Alderweireld, Bellerin, Wollscheid
      KDB, Ozil, Barkley, Ramsey, Mahrez
      Kane, Lukaku

      Subs: De Gea, Vardy, Ward, Dawson

      Any changes you'd make?

    • Sheeeit
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Anyone taking a punt on Aguero going Aguerooooo against Sunderland?

      1. Jax
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 12 hours ago

        no.

      2. Jøssy ⭐
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 12 hours ago

        Already have him, so hoping for big things! 😀

    • Rains of Castamere
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      My midfield and attack...

      Mahrez 15pts Alli 12pts Ozil 12pts Wijnaldum (C) 4pts

      Giroud 8pts Lukaku 6pts Kane 6pts

      Red arrow from OR 55K to 85K.

      Lack of clean sheets and poor captain picks killing me even when the gameweek seems decent overall. Toughest FPL season yet!

    • Sif
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 13 hours ago

      Myhill & McCathery. FT to ship McC and get 15 starters.

      Straight(ish) swap to Hennessey or a very belated jump on the Butland wagon?

      1. Mo Mané Mo Problems
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 13 hours ago

        Myhill's days are numbered.