Community Submissions

Value Over Replacement Player (VORP) – The Forwards

This is the second in a two-article series looking in detail at the theory of Value Over Replacement Player (VORP), which involves comparing players of similar prices to see who offers the best value. A more detailed explanation can be found here. While the first part looked at midfielders, this focuses on forwards.

As with my look at midfielders, the focus of this research will look at players’ points per game (PPG) statistics and also make an assumption that 3-4-3 offers the best value. Another assumption that is made is that 34.0 is the optimal spend on defenders on goalkeepers, a 4.5 fifth midfielder is included and we have 61.5 to spend on seven midfield and attacking regulars.

Here is a look at the best forwards in terms of how much their PPG increases depending on how much more you spend on them. In this case I have used a block of 0.5 in price increase. This gives the player’s VORP.  I have also included the average forward’s VORP.

Change in 0.1PPG/Change in 0.5m

Papiss Cisse 9.0
Diafra Sakho 8.0
Andy Carroll 5.0
Saido Berahino 4.0
Mame Diouf 3.0
Christian Benteke 1.8
Danny Ings 1.67
Average Forward VORP 1.53
Olivier Giroud 1.5
Graziano Pelle 1.0
Romelu Lukaku 0.75
Wayne Rooney 0.55
Stevan Jovetic 0.5
Daniel Sturridge 0.33
Wilfred Bony 0.2

Mid-Priced Forwards

Amongst the 8.0 options, Pelle and Lukaku broadly seem to meet expectations as an increase in price does bring about some additional production, however frustrating or middling it might be. Ings is an interesting one; Liverpool’s state of flux makes it hard to predict his situation, but his value is certainly there.

Amongst the 8.5 plus group of players, Christian Benteke’s returns are better on average than Giroud’s. In contrast, Rooney offered poor value for money last year, but that is largely due to being used as a central midfielder. He is widely expected to increase his points production next season if he can cement a central attacking role.

Premium-Priced Forwards

Sergio Aguero, Diego Costa, and Harry Kane were last season’s elite forwards, offering an immense return of points for their price. Harry Kane, in particular, offered one of the best value striking options the Fantasy Football world has ever seen. Aguero’s stratospheric 6.5 PPG, Costa’s 5.8 and Kane’s 5.6 far surpassed the competition, with the next highest PPG for a forward a distant 4.4.

You can’t go wrong with Aguero and Costa, as the most you spend, the more they produce – exactly what you want from an elite attacker and exemplifying the captaincy security expected for such a high price.

Kane, like Silva, is the most interesting one here due to his lowly price tag last season. Can he continue to perform in 2015/16 priced at 9.5?  If he performs at last year’s level he would once again be worth every penny. Even with some regression he would remain an elite prospect. I calculate that he could score a full 1.0 PPG lower this year and still come in as fourth most productive forward.

Further Discussion

Could a different formation be applied to this research to see how much value premium defenders offer for their price? What price tag and points return should we be looking at for our third forwards and fourth midfielders? Is a cheap fifth midfielder the way to go still?

14 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Here's that link again for the midfielders version of this. http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/07/17/value-over-replacement-player-vorp-the-midfielders/

    1. Twisted Saltergater
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      This would be brilliant but as it is based on the RMT player predictions for this season it is heavily skewed by a human element.

      I would like to see the VORP calculations based on last seasons actual stats, then we're free to interpret how new player additions, manager changes, returns from injury, etc. count for or against each player.

      1. Twisted Saltergater
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        *this was meant to be a separate comment

      2. tm245
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Sorry for the confusion, but these numbers are based on their actual FPL points. RMT was only used as a reference to make sure my premise was somewhat justified.

        These PPG are taken directly from the FPL site.

        1. Twisted Saltergater
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Oh excellent, thanks for clarifying that, TM245

        2. Patch
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          I would be very interested to see this analysis using PPG based on FFS RMT.

  2. tm245
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Looking at the cheaper forwards:

    The value at the top of this list is impressive, especially when comparing them with the midfielders as well. Before calling it an apples to oranges comparison since the baselines were not identical, don't forget that four midfielders and three forwards must be purchased in this scenario so VORP is an attempt to factor in positional scarcity when comparing player value.

    In addition, the similar price point seems to lend strong support to the idea of starting with at least one 6.5m forward because the abundance of value options at that price gives FPL owners flexibility if they want to transfer to a different player.

    Cisse, Sakho, Berahino, and Diouf absolutely crush their price tags in this comparison. I wonder if our reluctance to cherish them is because Kane and to a lesser extent Austin have skewed our perspectives on what a cheap attacker should deliver. In any other season, those first four would appear much more compelling.

    1. Twisted Saltergater
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I agree 100% actually. Sakho has been a mainstay in many of my squad drafts due to the value on offer, his form from last season when fit and healthy, West Ham's transfers business, and a more attacking manager. He enables the expensive captain options while (hopefully) not giving up too much in the PPG stakes.

  3. John t penguin
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Good work TM

  4. ⚽ Template
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Interesting read, thanks TM245.

  5. the cromulent one
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Great work! I do love the VORP approach to calculating value.
    One aspect of the methodology that I do find problematic, however, is that only last year's ppg are used. I agree that this is perhaps necessary both for simplicity's sake and to have apples-to-apples comparisons between the players. Still, I wonder if a longer-term analysis would give different results. Silva, for instance, had an incredible year. But if you take the last 5 years, would he still have such great value?
    To use an analogy from finance (that will probably lose everyone), back in the 90s, a hedge fund ("Long Term Capital Management") came up with a novel way of calculating the risk of options. It used historical volatility to come up with the formula, but the problem was that the history only went as far back as 1988, ie after the 1987 crash. To make a long story short, it ended in tears (and a bailout) because it only looked at very recent history.
    I'm not suggesting that you redo the analysis, just to realize its shortcomings.
    Again, superb work. (I don't want to sound like I'm poo-pooing the whole effort!)

    1. tm245
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks for the response. I remember your great posts from the past on this concept as very helpful ways for me to think about this approach.

      As for the long view, I love the idea. Would probably just look at the premiums and go for points/90minutes since I don't have access to the FPL data beyond what is available in this year's game. Will try to see what I can find.

  6. Kanu Feel It
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Great article. I think I'm gonna be basing my team on RMT player predictions using the VORP method. Every year I spend the weeks leading up to the season just tinkering and tinkering away and usually just beat myself (my own worst enemy basically). But for a starting team if I just let the numbers do the work and then go from there I might have more success.

  7. dribbler
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I really enjoyed both these articles...certainly valuable food for thought...thanks very much TM245