Fixtures

The FA Cup Solutions – Part One

It’s fair to say that the next two rounds of FA Cup fixtures will make a significant impact on the plans of Fantasy managers.

The FA Cup fifth round gets underway this Friday, with those Premier League teams who advance and book a place in the quarter-finals set to blank in Gameweek 31.

Meanwhile, the top-flight sides who progress to the semi-finals would also be without a fixture in Gameweek 35.

Even the Gameweek 28 schedule could be affected – should Man City fail to beat Wigan at the first attempt on Monday night, their league clash with Arsenal, currently scheduled for Thursday March 1, would need to be moved to another date.

Introduced to Fantasy Premier League (FPL) this season, the Free Hit Chip looks the ideal solution to cope with these truncated rounds of fixtures.

With that in mind, we’ll be assessing the optimum strategies when approaching the use of this chip as a means of navigating this period of the season.

In this part, we specifically look at the merits of playing the Free Hit for Gameweek 31.

That will then be followed by analysis of the alternative strategy: to steer through Gameweek 31 and deploy the chip in Gameweek 35.

A third article will also look to help those FPL managers without the Free Hit, discussing methods to get through the affected Gameweeks while taking minimal damage to their rank and mini-league standing.

Firstly, let’s look at the issue of Gameweek 31 in terms of the potential impact on the schedule.

The Fixtures

At present, just two matches are guaranteed to play out in Gameweek 31.

Liverpool vs Watford
Stoke City vs Everton

The fixtures added to this will depend on the results from the FA Cup Fifth Round, which looks like this:

Leicester vs Sheffield United
Chelsea vs Hull
Sheffield Wednesday vs Swansea
West Brom vs Southampton
Brighton vs Coventry
Huddersfield vs Man United
Rochdale vs Spurs
Wigan vs Man City

Six of the ten Premier League sides still remaining in the FA Cup – Leicester City, Chelsea, West Brom, Spurs, Huddersfield and Man United – have Gameweek 31 opponents who are already knocked out.

For the first four of those teams, the scenario is pretty straightforward.

If Leicester are defeated by Sheffield United, their Gameweek 31 match at home to Arsenal goes ahead.

If Chelsea lose to Hull, their Gameweek 31 trip to Burnley takes place.

If West Brom are knocked out by Southampton, they’ll be making their way to Bournemouth in Gameweek 31.

And if Spurs lose to Rochdale, their Gameweek 31 home match with Newcastle is good to go.

However, given that Leicester, Chelsea and Spurs all face lower-league opponents, West Brom potentially look the best chance of offering us a Gameweek 31 match (away to Bournemouth). The Baggies have lost home and away to their FA Cup fifth round opponents Southampton already this season.

For the remaining two teams from the six listed above, Huddersfield and Man United’s head-to-head at the John Smith’s Stadium on Friday is key.

Regardless of who advances, we will definitely have a third Gameweek 31 fixture available.

If Huddersfield lose to the Red Devils, then David Wagner’s men will host Crystal Palace in Gameweek 31.

But if Jose Mourinho’s men are knocked out by the Terriers, then United will travel to West Ham in Gameweek 31.

The other four teams – Swansea, Southampton, Man City and Brighton – look far less likely to drop back in.

Swansea and Southampton are currently set to square up in Gameweek 31. But in order for that fixture to go ahead, both sides would need to lose their FA Cup matches with Sheffield Wednesday and West Brom respectively.

Similarly, Man City’s Gameweek 31 home match with Brighton will be postponed should either of them beat their lower league opponents, Coventry and Wigan, respectively.

At present, then, the worst-case scenario for Gameweek 31 is that six teams will have a fixture.

Liverpool, Watford, Stoke and Everton are definites. They will be joined by either Huddersfield and Crystal Palace, or West Ham and Man United.

The Gameweek 31 Free Hit – The Pros

To a degree, your chosen strategy will depend on whether you also have the second Wildcard chip at your disposal.

Having the Wildcard enables managers to use free transfers leading up to Gameweek 31 to bring in players that will be active. The Wildcard can then be used to immediately clear these players out, with future double Gameweek players drafted in as replacements.

If you don’t have the Wildcard, then playing the Free Hit Chip in Gameweek 31 looks a more viable tactic.

These managers need to immediately start thinking about future double Gameweeks, targeting players who are likely to miss out in Gameweek 31 but benefit from two fixtures in a single Gameweek further down the line – most likely Gameweek 34 and possibly Gameweek 37, should they also progress to the semi-final.

By committing to the Free Hit for Gameweek 31 ahead of the Gameweek 28 deadline, it means that all remaining free transfers can be dedicated to this strategy of double Gameweek recruitment.

The Free Hit can then used to temporarily trade these players out in place of a strong 15-man squad fully equipped for the remaining Gameweek 31 fixtures. In theory, this should maximise the potential return.

One caveat to mention at this point is that today’s double Gameweek assets may not be tomorrow’s: injury, loss of form or concerns over pitch-time are all factors that can emerge as the Gameweeks roll by. Those shopping for double Gameweek targets further down the line will have more information in this respect.

Even if you still have a Wildcard, there is still some merit to playing the Free Hit Chip in Gameweek 31.

It gives managers the freedom to totally ignore the looming blanks as a factor and recruit players in form and with good fixtures for the next three Gameweeks.

For example, among those teams who could miss Gameweek 31, the likes of Spurs (cry HUD bou), Leicester (STK BOU wba), Burnley (SOT EVE whu) and Swansea (bha WHU hud) all have schedules that look profitable.

Those who commit to the Gameweek 31 Free Hit now – with plans to Wildcard in Gameweek 32 or perhaps 33 – can hope to gain a real advantage. They not only have a full squad in Gameweek 31, they can also exploit the form of players outside of those teams active in that Gameweek.

The Gameweek 31 Free Hit – The Cons

If FA Cup fifth round results leave just three fixtures in Gameweek 31, then there is the concern that the impact of having a full squad for the matches that remain will be minimal.

If you already own four-to-six players among the Gameweek 31 contingent, it is questionable just how much more potential you can unlock by using the Free Hit chip and fielding eleven players. Much will rely on your ability to hit the remaining big scorers.

Depending on what is left of the fixtures, you could supplement your existing Gameweek 31 players with your remaining free transfers – perhaps enabling you to field seven or eight of the key targets.

The upcoming schedules offered by Liverpool, Everton and Watford all seem potentially profitable and all three have form options to aim for.

Liverpool pair Mohamed Salah (58% ownership) and Roberto Firmino (39%) are already heavily backed, while Virgil van Dijk appeals in defence for a run of five strong fixtures (WHU NEW WAT cry eve) in the next six. Sadio Mane’s hat-trick in Wednesday’s Champions League victory over Porto also adds him to the mix as a potentially powerful differential.

Meanwhile, Everton’s next four (wat bur BRI stk) bring Theo Walcott and Oumar Niasse into consideration, while Watford have four home matches in the next six (EVE WBA BOU BUR) in addition to their Gameweek 31 trip to Anfield.

Gerard Deulofeu, Richarlison or Abdoulaye Doucoure could be worth a roll of the dice, while Stoke’s Xherdan Shaqiri (27 points in the four Gameweeks under Paul Lambert) is now looking value for money at 6.2.

On paper, these currently look to be the key targets for Gameweek 31 that will form the nucleus of any Free Hit squad. If you already own a share of these and can bring in the rest with free transfers, it raises doubts as to the potential gains of deploying the Free Hit chip.

Much depends on how these assets perform versus those players not active in Gameweek 31. However, as mentioned above, the outlook in terms of the fixtures leading up to that point looks favourable enough.

Crucially, this would enable you to retain the Free Hit for use in Gameweek 35 – the weekend of the FA Cup semi-finals.

Without the chip for that Gameweek, you are forced to plan for the likely double Gameweek 37, while also having one eye on the blank fixtures that loom in Gameweek 35.

This could either limit your ability to exploit that final double Gameweek or weaken your line-up for Gameweek 35. It could also undermine your potential if you’re planning to use the Bench Boost chip in Gameweek 34, since you will need to guard against owning too many inactive Gameweek 35 players.

Without the Free Hit, we are faced with a balancing act that would dictate your transfers.

We will look at the Gameweek 35 Free Hit solution in the second part of this series.

For now, we should stress that the appeal of that particular solution is again dependent on the availability of the Wildcard.

Without it, there is the risk of loading up on Gameweek 31 assets and suffering a “hangover” of players surplus to requirements, with the focus at the point firmly on recruiting for the double Gameweeks.

The Gameweek 32-33 schedules of Everton (MCI LIV) and Stoke (ars TOT) in particular, provide a warning that it is far from desirable to go beyond Gameweek 31 with their players on board.

In Conclusion

There are a number of factors affecting FPL managers’ views on using the Free Hit in Gameweek 31.

The current state and make-up of their squad, the number of Chips still in hand and the quantity and quality of fixtures that will take place are all vital.

At present, the worst-case scenario for Gameweek 31 is a total of three fixtures, with six for Gameweek 35 – so far, Everton vs Newcastle, Arsenal vs West Ham, Stoke vs Burnley and Watford vs Crystal Palace are confirmed.

If things remain the same and the cup matches frustrate us, the bigger talent pool for Gameweek 35 may be the deciding factor, particularly if Huddersfield v Crystal Palace drops in as the third fixture.

Yet if Huddersfield prevail and give us West Ham vs Man United instead in Gameweek 31, the goal posts may shift. That would hand us the likes of Marko Arnautovic, Chicharito and Alexis Sanchez as potentially powerful Free Hit targets.

Ultimately, the results from the upcoming round of FA Cup matches will be crucial to how we assess this period of the season as we come to grips with the Free Hit Chip for the first time.

Fortunately, the draw for the quarter-finals of the FA Cup will take place at 8pm this Saturday, to give us a clearer picture of the situation not only for Gameweek 31, but also for projecting the likely impact on Gameweek 35.

That is where we turn next, as we look more closely at the benefits and pitfalls of delaying the Free Hit chip until later in the run-in.

Mark Mark created the beast. He's now looking to tame it.

616 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Chip question....

    The typical trend to those who have all chips is to plan for BGW31, then wildcard and then use the FH in BGW35.

    But, for those who don’t have their wildcard (such as me), how are you planning to play your chips, in particular FH?

    1. SoccerBoi69
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      The same, but without wildcarding.

      1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        How come?

        I’m not saying you are wrong, just want to know how you’ve come to that decision.

        How will you try and maximise the DGW potentials if you are stuck with a lot of the GW31 players?

      1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Spot on, cheers mate.

        This article is helpful, but your links helpful as it gives us multiple views.

        I’m still coming for you in draft 😉

        1. Deulofail
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Sane, Silva and Morata back soon/now. My lead shall extend again in no time 😉

          1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            That does scare me to be honest!

            I’m hoping my Giroud keeps Morata out!

      2. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        This hot topics actually really helpful.

        I’m going to FH BGW35.

  2. wulfrunian
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I would appreciate your help.Can recognize the guy at 1:03?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6zcBQPO_aY&list=PLCE8387817FE7B22C&index=34

    1. wulfrunian
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      *you

    2. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yes, it’s Joey Barton 😉

  3. DeadStarComing
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I see all the strategies involving the chips still only talk about using the free hit for a blank game week. At the start of the season I rated the chips in order of how many points they could gain me in a double game week (as these are usually the biggest scoring weeks). I actually concluded that the free hit chip was the best, bench boost second and triple captain being the weakest. I came to this conclusion because the free hit allows you to draft in any 11 DGW players on that very game week (no previous week wildcard required), whilst also allowing you to be committed to the players.

    Taking navigating the blanks into consideration, is using free hit on a DGW a non starter?

    1. UshFPL
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I think TC is better than bench boost. Bench boost just means the dross you have on the bench get played, it's overrated imo.

      1. DeadStarComing
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Not when used on a DGW. Lots of people play the wildcard the week before and have 14-15 DGW players. Admittedly it’s usually a stretch on the budget.

        1. Zenith UK
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          This is what I'm really debating doing... I'm not as fussed about OR being top 30K but I am worried about winning my MLs that I currently lead. I'm tempted to WC the week before and then FH the week of DGW so I can BB 15 players effectively having 30 play. Then I'll TC on the other DGW.

          1. cheese XL
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            You can't FH and BB in the same week though

            1. Zenith UK
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              Sorry, WC the week before DGW and then BB, ugh, I'm at work and it took me five attempts to write that out/complete it. #Fail.

              1. cheese XL
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 2 months ago

                Haha, extenuating circumstances

      2. FFSbet.com
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Disagree,BB played on DGW after WC with 15DGW players is very important.

        TC is not so important,your x3 vs mine x2 cant be big difference.

        1. Goonerforever.
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Salah and Firmino Vs Bournemouth

    2. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      If you only had one chip all season, and it was the FH chip, then you might be right. But you have to use the FH chip in conjunction with the BB and WC chips. As a general rule, you wouldn't want to plan to use BB on a BGW or TC on a single GW.

      1. DeadStarComing
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I should have been clearer there is no doubt the WC/BB combo is best for a big DGW. What I’m thinking is if there is a second fairly big DGW then a free hit is worth much more than the triple captain (assuming you don’t already own lots of DGW players you want).

    3. Speédy
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      The TC and BB are best used in a double though. So even if FH has the highest potential in a double,it is the only chip that can be played elsewhere. And as there will most probably be only two double gameweeks,playing BB and TC there makes sense.

    4. Rover
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      It has all to do with fixtures before and after. If it's DGW players you'd want anyway then it's not as valuable then. Similarly, if t's BGW players you wouldn't want otherwise, then it becomes all the more valuable. In this case, with 3 Pool becoming the standard template now, and them having the form and fixtures to support that, it seems fine.

  4. Rover
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    So if all English teams go through in CL, and Wigan draw with City now, but then no more upsets on the whole, there still is a chance of a TGW right?

    1. Drogba Legend
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Has there ever been a TGW?

      1. Gnu
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Nope.

      2. Jereme Halliday
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        yep

        1. Gnu
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          🙂
          Remind me?

          1. Drogba Legend
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Wild.

          2. Wild Rover
            • 13 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            It’s often said that Birmingham (Zigic 😯 ) had one but I think this is just a myth

            1. Little Frank
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              Yes, I remember that one, it looked like it might be a TGW but ended up as DGW, blank, DGW.

              1. Wild Rover
                • 13 Years
                6 years, 2 months ago

                And we all Captained Zigic for his 1pt 😀

      3. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        WHU ?

  5. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Out of interest, what do people find the most useful members feature?

    Probably the ticker for me

    1. DeadStarComing
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I like the ticker too. Also use the odd stat table and comparison tool when struggling to choose between two players.

    2. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      comparison and player stats tables

    3. LǝgleSs e|even
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Player heatmap

    4. Deus
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Not using anything

    5. Veezeeboy
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Stats tables

  6. FFSbet.com
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Repost from early morning:

    Would you do Kun > Kane if you only captain Kane once till GW36?

    I will only captain for DGW34 only if they have one

    1. Speédy
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yes. I'd still do it. There's no denying Kane is the best striker in the PL.

  7. Babit1967
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Tempted to ditch Alonso for Montreal to free up cash but every time I get Alonso out he scores

    1. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Get him out now please 🙂

  8. Fantasy Gold
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Shane Long injured.

    Plans > Window

    1. badgerboy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Gabbiadini TC.

  9. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    ozil 3-0

    micky assist

    1. Fantasy Gold
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Mkhi for the run-in looks essential

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        The cool kids have already had a hatty of assists from him 😎

        1. Fantasy Gold
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Well done

        2. Deulofail
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Wrong account, Virg.

  10. DA Minnion (Former great)
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Wish I still had my free hit chip.

  11. LǝgleSs e|even
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Cmon Ozil two more, need the bandwagon to shift from Mane to you

  12. JONALDINHO
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    How is Mkhi looking. Just saw his nice assist for Ozil. Wondering if I should get him for City as Arsenal are so good at home and will need to go for it!

  13. Revival
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Looks like using free transfers alone I can possibly field 9 players in GW31. Have a nice strategy mapped out that includes keeping the likes of Kane, Sterling and Hazard. Now just waiting on a couple of unforseen cup upsets to ruin my whole plan.

    1. Ibracadabra
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Me too...

      If the FA Cup goes the "Bookies Predicted" way, I should have 9 with free transfers and 10 if Kenny plays..

      Foster
      Kenny* - Van Dijk - Francis - Zanka
      Salah - Shaqiri - Walcott - CMoting
      Firmino

      *Coleman muscular injury could be lucky for me.

      I have 5 free transfers currently and will bring in Walcott, Van Dijk, Zanka and Shaqiri as 4 out of 5. All of this is tentative and could turn into shit of course.

      1. Revival
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Am thinking something like this...
        Lossl
        Kenny* VVD Hegazi
        Salah Doucoure Shaqiri
        Firmino Wilson

        Will do Lossl > DDG in GW32 and Wildcard in GW33

        1. Ibracadabra
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          I think that's a great GW31 team for free.

          I own only 6 currently (Foster, Kenny, Francis, Salah, CMoting, Firmino) and the 4 I plan to buy are all players either in form or ones I would not mind owning anyway in the run up:

          1) Walcott
          2) Van Dijk (or Karius if West Brom don't play in 31)
          3) Zanka (4th defender, fine fixtures, cheap, Ogbonna replacement)
          4) Shaqiri (Son replacement, in form, has GW31 fixture, will probably not make this move until 31 for one week only).

          I think most players on here could easily field 9/10 in GW31 and the free hit seems like such a waste but that's just personal opinion.

          I understand the counter-argument that I would have "missed out" on some nice fixtures from Arsenal or others in the interim but I will keep my players with good fixtures all the way to 31... and get rid of my players with poor fixtures/form now for the likes of Walcott, etc.

          Seems not that difficult to me.

  14. Fantasy Gold
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    These transfers for -4 are idiotic, aren’t they?

    Alonso, Sterling and Wilson > VVD, Shaqiri and Kane

    1. barracuda
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I will move Sterling and Shaq out in GW32 for hopefully healthy Ramsey and Miki

    2. LǝgleSs e|even
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Kun and Firmino your other strikers?

      1. Fantasy Gold
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Yeah

  15. 007 [RoboKlopp]
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Hi, which one better?
    A. Adrian, Naughton
    B. Fabianski, Simpson (if nailed)
    Thanks.

    1. Wild Rover
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      So when will you know if Simpson is nailed?

  16. dan_247
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Hi all, suggestions welcome on the below team. 0.3 itb and 1FT:

    DDG
    Elliott
    Christiensen
    Mee
    Jones
    Kenny
    Ota
    Salah
    Sterling
    Richarl
    Lingard
    Walcott
    Kun
    Vardy
    Wilson

    Open to all suggestions...

    Thank you

  17. Wild Rover
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Bellerend

  18. CloudSky
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Michy game winner in 92nd vs Atalanta.

    1. LǝgleSs e|even
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Conte's loss. Dortmund wins

    2. Fantasy Gold
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Excellent decision by Chelsea to sell him

      1. Tazah
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        *loan

    3. Dannyb
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Won me £40 that goal lol

  19. DJ1000
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Current team:-

    Adrian

    Alonso Ota Jones
    Kdb Sterling Salah Ibe
    Wilson Kane Firminho

    Subs Pereira Arnold Schindler Rlc

    Now thinking of replacing Ota Arnold and Kdb
    With Hegazi/Janmaat, Van Dijk and Eriksen.

    This will all depend on Fa cup games but do you think Eriksrn
    Could be a great differential and these are potentially good moves.
    Would then keep Alonso and bring Deulofeu in
    For 2nd home match against wba

  20. as33
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Monreal is nailed?

    1. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      For now, yeah

  21. barracuda
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Too risky to go without Sterling? Thinking to switch to Miki. (got KDB)

    1. Drogba Legend
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I guess if you have KDB you're covered, but Sterling is still a good option.

    2. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Not too risky. (Wouldn't do it myself unless I was using FH chip in GW31 or Arsenal have a fixture, though Mkhi could outscore Sterling over the rest of the season - Sterling isn't obviously better, so it's not "too risky")

      1. barracuda
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Sterling doesn't have a fixture in 31 too.

        1. Deulofail
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Yeah... I'd rather have Sterling with no GW31 fixture than Mkhi with no GW31 fixture -1FT (or -4pts).

  22. rokonto
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Is it worth gettin Trippier with Aurier in the picture?

    1. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Probably not unless you have a strong autosub to rotate him with when he's rested. Arguably then a waste of money, but arguably worth it too.

      1. rokonto
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Alonso. Dunk. Otamendi. Fernandez. Long.
        Thinkin dunk out 4 trippier.
        Alonso doubtful
        Otamendi rotation?
        Long not nailed.
        Could be left with just fernandez playin if i get trippier for dunk and he and the other 3 don't play.

        1. Deulofail
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Can't judge without the whole team, mate, because all bench players and starters are important to see the likelihood that Fernandez is needed to replace (or rotate with) other players in your team.

          My guess is that it's not worth it for you unless you have another strong sub other than Fernandez, or you plan to get one soon.

    2. Optimus.
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      That's Walcott in the picture

      1. Fantasy Gold
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        🙂

      2. rokonto
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Eh?

      3. rokonto
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Joker lol smh

          1. rokonto
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Heheh... u need a shave fella

            1. Optimus.
              • 13 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              🙂

  23. Tazah
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    even though arsenal won 3-0 that was a bad performance, they should be destroying that team, they(the swedish team) were so disorganised in defence with so many gaps.

    Unless auba has a profound effect on that attack im staying clear....

    1. Fantasy Gold
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Probably took their foot off the gas after the two early goals

    2. Ibracadabra
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      It's not that Auba won't score, he will... but will he be better value than Firmino/Vardy for 2m cheaper? Doubtful.

      And will you captain him instead of Aguero/Kane/Salah? Doubtful.

      For the price he seems a risk regardless of fixtures.

      1. Fantasy Gold
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Ibra - all very good points.

      2. Deulofail
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        But I already have Vardy and Firmino. So the question for me is 'is he better than Wilson or Niasse?'

        1. Fantasy Gold
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Not really, depends what you could do with the extra cash in midfield if you went for a cheaper third striker.

          You’ll rarely captain Auba so is he worth the outlay?

          1. Deulofail
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Huh? You agreed with the same logic from Ibracadabra. I'm just mimicking it, tongue-in-cheek.

            I didn't say this made Auba more or less desirable.

            If I wanted to make him more desirable, I'd have taken the same logic, but questioned Kane, Aguero or Lukaku's value over Auba. I'm rarely going to captain Kane over Salah, so he's not worth the extra 2.3m over Auba.

            1. Deulofail
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              (in fact that has been my reasoning since I sold Kane in GW18 - and one reason I haven't bought Aguero or Sanchez since then either)

  24. barracuda
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Walcott or Shaq?

    1. Fantasy Gold
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Both ideally but Shaq if I had to choose

      1. barracuda
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Can't decide whatever I want to keep Sterling and Shaq or want to risk it and go with Miki and Wallly.

        1. Fantasy Gold
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          I’d stick with the ones you have

          1. barracuda
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Cheers

  25. I Have No Idea What I'…
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I've been planning on saving my wildcard, but does it make sense to use it now considering I have the below in my squad?

    Gomez - Rotation Risk
    Jones - Rotation Risk
    Ramsey - Injured
    Alonso - Injured
    Otamendi - Rotation Risk
    Sterling - Rotation Risk
    Aguero - Rotation Risk
    Steve Davis - Regular Substitute

    My other players are Salah, Firmino, De Gea, Lossl, Mustafi, Wilson and Ibe.

  26. WVA
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Monreal is life

  27. Ibracadabra
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    A thought for Son owners (like me) who may be wondering whether they should sell/hold him.

    Here's the bad news:

    1) Son is coming off 4 straight blanks (2-3-2-3).
    2) Lamela was preferred in the Champions League and Moura will be brought in to the side - making him a rotation risk, and he rarely completes 70 minutes as it is.

    Here's the great news:

    1) Last 3 fixtures were ManU, Liv, Arsenal. Next 3 are Crystal Palace, Huddersfield, and Bournemouth.
    2) Tottenham play Juventus on March 7th in their second leg of the Champions League. In GW29 on 3/3, Tottenham take on relegation threatened Huddersfield at home in the home banker of the week. If Lamela is preferred in the CL playing against a team he is familiar with (he played in Serie A for 3 years, and he played well on Tuesday night) that means Son should start at home against Huddersfield - as he has been great against poor teams at home at Wembley. He may also be re-instated to the squad for the weekend fixture after the CL (Bournemouth, gw30) depending on the CL result and his usage.

    Conclusion: I would personally HOLD Son for the next 3 gameweeks, and expect 1-2 starts, with 1 of those being the best fixture of the weekend in GW29 - home to Huddersfield. Then, if you have carried over 2 transfers to GW30/GW31, you can sell Son for the Mane upgrade or the Shaq/Walcott/Watford/Bournemouth dowgrade - as he is the perfect mid priced player to enable a free double switch.

    I am expecting 75+ minutes against Huddersfield and 90 minutes combined against Crystal Palace and Bournemouth. Son has slayed the small teams this season, so barring FA Cup results this weekend and other injuries, he is an absolute HOLD for me.

    1. Ibracadabra
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      It goes without saying, that if you have been watching Spurs matches, Son has been extremely lively and close to scoring/assisting even against Arsenal, Liv and ManU in the past few weeks. For example, the Eriksen free kick that Cech tipped over the bar would have gone down as a Son assist, as he was fouled to earn it.

      Furthermore, he has already scored this season against Crystal Palace, Watford, Stoke, Brighton, Southampton, West Ham and Everton - exactly the type of bottom half teams he faces off against in the next three weeks.

    2. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Some great points, I'm a Son owner and have been toying with the idea of ditching him. I am concerned about rotation though despite your optimism + away form has been poor.

      1. Ibracadabra
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I have toyed with the idea of ditching him too which led me to my research. I just have bigger issues (RLC, etc.) and depending on FA Cup results, will likely keep him.

        1. TLF
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          I could do a straight swap for Mane which is tempting as have the cash itb. I should probably focus on a new keeper though and 3rd Pool spot may go to Karius, good luck.

  28. Optimus.
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I know I'm late to the party but was Liverpool's demolition of Porto last night the single best away performance in Europe of all time?

    1. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Wasn't even the best last night. 🙄

      1. Fantasy Gold
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        You beat a pub team 5-0. Bravo

    2. Optimus.
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Caught a couple of big ones with that bait 😉

      https://media.giphy.com/media/3o85xofTjpM3aHu0Eg/giphy.gif

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        It’s like fishing with dynamite in a pond. Can’t fail on here : D

        1. Wild Rover
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Smiley fails are another matter 🙄

      2. Fantasy Gold
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I was trying to re-bait you by calling FC Porto a pub team.

        Damn, didn’t work 😉

        1. Optimus.
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Ah 😉

          🙂

    3. Hairy Potter
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Shola Ameobi scoring in the Camp Nou was clearly the single best away performance in Europe of all time.

  29. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I foolishly got Choupo-Moting in couple of weeks back instead of Shaqiri. Is it worth taking -4 to get Shaqiri in C-M’s place until WC in 32/33 or just stick with C-M?

    1. Fantasy Gold
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Damage is done now.

      Stick with C-M.

      1. dunas_dog
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Thanks that was what I reckoned but just don’t like seeing him in my team!

        1. Fantasy Gold
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Same here, I made the same mistake 🙂

    2. Ibracadabra
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I am taking a hybrid approach and benching CM for the next few weeks until using him in the GW31 blank and buying Shaq in GW31 (HOME TO EVERTON) for one week only in prep for a WC32. I don't think it's worth a -4 with the fixtures especially if you have other pressing transfers to get 9/10 out in GW31. Stoke don't score a lot and Shaq has the form but not amazing fixtures (City and Leicester) in the short term.

      1. dunas_dog
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Thanks. Good idea- will think of that also when looking at week 31 players

    3. Homer21
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Me too, what to do?

      1. Homer21
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I feel if i swap, he will score!

  30. Michelle Davin
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Alonso to Van Dijk?

    1. Alexis Nonsense
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I'm thinking Vertonghen atm

      Wait and see, he's not going to drop tonight anyway