Podcast
23 April 2015 3017 comments
Mark Mark
Share:

It’s not often that we get to spend a good portion of the ScoutCast discussing Leicester City’s rich array of Fantasy talent.

That’s how this week’s episode pans out, as Luke aka “D1sable” does his George Boyd act to come off the bench and join myself, Granville and Jonty to analyse the impending double Gameweek.

We tackle the usual ScoutCast regulars, whilst deflecting the latest round of questions from the community, assessing the great Foxes hunt, the Hazard versus Sterling gamble and even how we can possibly eek out a valid target amongst the Hull City squad. Meanwhile, Granville is dreaming of a three-digit points bonanza as he joins the world’s number one in activating his belated FPL Wildcard.

This week’s episode was beamed out live on Monday evening via Google Hangouts. You can catch the full fat version via the player below.

For those who prefer a more refined, fine dining version, you’ll need to click this link or use the smaller player below for the edited MP3 audio.

Be sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel and Google Plus page to keep informed of when future ScoutCast hit the screen.

Mark Mark created the beast. He's now looking to tame it.

  1. andy85wsm
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Is Skrtel's goal threat as good as they say?

    There's two things that people will tell you when considering Liverpool defence, and that is Skrtel is the main man because of goal threat and bonus. I won't argue the bonus point of view but I feel the goal threat is potentially being over valued.

    I took a look earlier and found some interesting stats

    Goal attempts in the box this season:

    Ivanovic - 26
    Terry - 16
    Skrtel - 14
    Moreno - 13

    Moreno only has 1 less goal attempt in 300 less minutes. Ivanovic is a bit of a unique one when it comes to attempts but Terry also has similar to Skrtel.

    It doesn't mean Skrtel has less threat but he's certainly not head and shoulders above the other popular DGW defenders, even in the Liverpool team.

    Additionally I looked at last year where Skrtel managed a very awesome 7 goals! He managed to do that with only 15 goal attempts in the box scoring nearly 1 in every 2 goal attempts in the box. He's only 1 attempt behind last season and 6 goals less.

    It's also worth noting that prior to last season Skrtel had never scored more than 2 goals in the premier league in one season so last season is a bit of an anomaly.

    All that being said Skrtel is probably the one I'll go for but not really because of his goal threat 🙂

    1. Henrzd
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      He's as big a goal threat as any CB in the Premier League. He just scored a lot last season because of Stevie G's beautiful set-plays.

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Well he's only scored one this season and at least 2 in the last 4 seasons so he's certainly due 🙂

    2. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      I think it's more to do with baps than goal threat

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Yeah probably.

        Moreno is certainly a nice option though - if I get priced out of the Skrtel move I won't be too bothered I don't think.

        1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yeah I wouldn't be too concerned either on that score, a decent alternative

        2. Ziegler1988
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Moreno would have taken three baps against Newcastle if not for the yellow card. He's no slouch in terms of BPS and will only be helped by no Sakho

    3. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      I have always said BAPs is the reason for Skrtel.

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        BPs aren't everything 🙂 Although Fonte is doing alright!

        1. JK - Cønt ⭐
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          But there's so little difference in attacking threat that BAPs can make the difference if neither get attacking returns

          1. andy85wsm
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Yeah you're probably right.

            I'm still waiting for that goal, assist and clean sheet match from Moreno after watching the Spurs game so early on 🙂

    4. brianutd-why always we? 20
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Could be a bit rusty, not match fit.

  2. Hybrid.power
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    First time listening to a Scoutcast. Mark sounds just like Baldrick from Blackadder!

  3. Scout picks challenge gw33 results
    @ocprodigy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    SCOUT PICKS CHALLENGE - GAMEWEEK 33 RESULTS

    Should have been posted earlier - admittedly been a bit lazy, apologies!

    Now, for the results, and a bit of bad news comes with them...

    1st - FFS Scout (56pts)
    2nd - Lionel's Messy Boxers (52pts)
    3rd - Krzys & Van Gaallelujah (48pts)

    with a lot of names scoring similar points all below - it was a tight gameweek. This is where the Scouts' advantage really begins to show - so don't be too disheartened!

    No bonus this gameweek of course.

    Again, no movement at the top (apart from the Scouts opening a difficult margin on Mookie!) but once again Sticky Mockwell better watch his back as Krzys has climbed closer. The final three are...

    1st - FFS Scout (22pts)
    2nd - Mookie (16pts)
    3rd - Sticky Mockwell (12pts)

    Onto the next gameweek!

    Spreadsheet: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oyuz31n7ppeccuu/Scout%20Picks%20Challenge.xlsm?dl=0

  4. Zasa
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Price Changes, April 24th, 2015.

    Risers: Mignolet

    Fallers: Rosicky Agbonlahor Clichy Silva Murphy Cazorla Mané

    1. sinik
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      😯

    2. Diva
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Cheers Zasa +1

    3. Kurtinho
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Tu Meke Zasa, Tu Meke!

      1. Zasa
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Kei hea te wharepaku?

        1. Kurtinho
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          😀 I don't speak Te Reo Maori, only know the odd phrase! You're not a kiwi, are you?!

          1. Zasa
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Of course I am Kurt!

            Was baptized last month into the Kiwi culture

            1. Kurtinho
              • 11 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              Haha 😛 welcome to Aotearoa!

    4. Marknlard
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Dammit Mane!

    1. The Enlightener
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Oh, ffs!

    2. Zasa
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      😯 Odin's raven!

      1. The Enlightener
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Uncle Johnathon's Corncob Pipe!

    3. Amateur Pundit Zan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Now that would be a differential punt and a half. Anyone dare?

    4. Green Arrow
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Knowing Mourinho, I think there's only a 20% chance he'll start at the Emirates.

      1. Nico.
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Who else will he

      2. Nico.
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        *start upfront then? We no longer have a Schurlle who really is a striker converted onto a winger

        1. Nico.
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          *into 😳 oh FFS, phone

    5. Nobodinho
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      *Check his price in FPL*

    6. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Surely he won't start. Sub role perhaps?

      1. Nico.
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        In the other times he was selected into the first team, he wasn't rested for the prior U21 game

        1. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yeah but he never came on as a sub.

          1. Nico.
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            I think the intention in the other games was to give him some minutes when the games were already won, which never was the case in the recent matches. Resting him for the U21 game essentially means that Mourinho intends to play him for more minutes than he would in a normal sub appearance

            1. Ryan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              You could be right. Or maybe he's just being made ready in case Remy or Costa don't pull through?

              1. Crystal
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                10 years, 7 months ago

                The Star said Remy was ready last week. Would think the youngster will be on the bench

    7. BeachBadger
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      DOubt he'll play but definitely casts more doubts over the fitness of the other strikers

    8. money face bandwagon
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Dominic in

    9. BIG TONES
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Lollllllllllllllllllllll

    10. Weasel Boy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      He's the back up for whatever striker does start.

      Maybe

    11. A.T
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Lol

  5. Wildcarders vs Non Wildcarders
    Ruth_NZ
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    A lot has been said about wildcards. Non-wildcarders are singing the praises of SGW players like Kane, Aguero, Silva, Clyne/Bertrand, Giroud etc and saying wildcarders would be mad to get rid. They are also asking how wildcarders "will get rid of" all the excess Leicester, Liverpool, Hull and Chelsea assets.

    All of this misses the point. A wildcard right now invites you to play a 5-GW season starting with a clean sheet. If you plan it right you will have a good idea what team you will play in every GW from 34 to 38 and will be keeping a FT spare (not committed) in case you need it. The wildcard is for 5 GWs, not 1, and should involve a smooth planned progression with no hits.

    For non wildcarders the situation is entirely different. They aren't starting with a clean sheet, they are starting with a team that is largely based on what has happened in the past. Maybe containing 1 or 2 injured players (Naughton, Baird, Sturridge, Foster) and probably containing players for whom fixtures are turning for the worse (Palace, WBA, Swansea).

    A wildcard player can decide whether Spurs in wind-down mode points to losing Kane, whether City's form and fixtures point to losing (one of) Silva or Aguero, whether Palace's 1 good fixture this week justifies keeping Murray or Bolasie. A non-wildcard player will mainly be removing the least useful players and trying to get in sufficient DGW players with as few hits as possible. It's a different mindset entirely.

    I think this is the big intangible benefit of a wildcard now. It presses you to play a 5-GW season when most are playing the last 5 GWs of an existing season. If you can cut free of what may have served well up till now and assess what will serve best from now on you will have a big advantage.

    That's why seeing wildcard teams with Murray, Kane, both Silva and Aguero, premium Southampton defenders etc seems crazy to me. I totally understand non-wildcarders sticking with those assets. But I think wildcarders who don't take a radical look at how to maximise points in a 5-GW season are missing a big trick. The template is busting open. Don't fall for the idea that you need to cling to yesterday's version.

    1. Acquafresca
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      tl;dr

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Don't comment then. That's easy enough.

        1. Acquafresca
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          This is no place for short stories bud. 😉

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Don't comment then. That's easy enough. Or do you want to set criteria for what others may post perhaps?

            1. Shifty
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              don't mess with the Elite 😀

            2. Ryan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              Or don't bite 😉

            3. Acquafresca
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              I only joke Ruth. Just late here and too busy watching NBA playoffs to read you novel. Maybe next time. 🙂

              1. Ruth_NZ
                • 10 Years
                10 years, 7 months ago

                Do or don't as you prefer. If you pass there's no need to comment. Simples.

                1. Acquafresca
                  • 14 Years
                  10 years, 7 months ago

                  Ok now you're just being over the top.

                  Do as Justin TImberlake sang and cry me a river.

                  1. Johnny98
                    • 11 Years
                    10 years, 7 months ago

                    Grow up, Acquafresca.

                2. OShaughnessy
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 13 Years
                  10 years, 7 months ago

                  Ruth, everyone here isn't here *trolling you*.
                  You're waaay too thin skinned...
                  Lighten up, this is just a game.
                  🙂

          2. Kalix
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Must be sad to have such a short attention span.

            We're talking about half a page in a MS Word document here, and something much shorter that the FFS articles.

      2. Rambo Motin
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        beef is strong

        1. Rambo Motin
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          And chill out Ruth, its just a bit of friendly banter

    2. Hairy Potter
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Spot on. Wish I had a wildcard, but haven't so I'm making the most of what I've got.

    3. Nickofoz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Good post Ruth. As a non-WC I can't really add any input but your points do seem valid. That said, If I was on WC I'd definitely keep Silva and Aguero.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        If you actually went through the wildcard process looking at the 5-GW season I don't think you would. You'd find it works better if you keep one or other but not both. Unless you have a huge TV of course.

        1. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          TV might be an interesting point here Ruth. Many can afford the top DGWers and top SGWers.

          1. The Enlightener
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Exactly.

          2. Ruth_NZ
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Yep. When I wildcarded I had a TV around 106. Silva out for me meant 10 DGW this week and Sanchez in next week. Keeping him meant 9 DGW this week and Ramsey or Ozil instead of Sanchez next week.

            With a TV around 109 I could probably have had the best of both worlds.

            1. Ryan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              My TV is 107.2 so not loads more. They I make it work is that I have to double up on defence for either Chelsea or Liverpool. This can save quite a bit of cash and enable one to keep Silva for example.

    4. Puyol Pants Up
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Good point, but both Silva and Aguero are keepers for me.

      1. Shifty
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        ^^

        Definitely possible to have a great WC team for the next 5 games with these 2 in the team.

    5. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Its still risky to be without highly owned players who have done so well this season. It could go either way.

      1. Shifty
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        agree.

    6. Scoredelario
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      The issue here is you can do a 5gw mini season from gws 1-5 pre wildcard.

      Doing so 34-38 has some advantages (DGW in this case) but also disadvantages... You don't know which teams will start rotating. Gw38 is also a random gw with crazy selections.

      Also an early wildcard doesn't have instant value like a dgw, but you can pick long-term picks to bring you through all the way to January. It is a slowerz steadier improvement to your team

      1. Shifty
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        unless you manage to navigate through January without using the wildcard 😀

      2. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        I agree with all of that. I'm not arguing that a late wildcard is better than an early one. Just discussing the difference between having one now or not.

        1. Scoredelario
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yeah me too 😀

        2. Scoredelario
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Good post btw. Sorry if it came across as a blunt disagreement. I was just adding to the discussion

    7. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      good point, it's a short term punts now., time to sell aguero and kane 👿

      Always like your posts ruth keep them up

      1. The Enlightener
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Time to sell Aguero and Kane. Lol.

    8. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      They are some interesting points Ruth, and you are dead right in that a WC right now is an opportunity to plan for 2-3 gameweek's time and finish the season with some differentials that will score big.

      However, I think the risk is that if you don't "cover" yourself with the same players that non-WCers have that they may fall behind ... i.e. "What if Aguero and Silva share 20 points this week, what if Southampton keep a clean sheet, etc."

      The problem is that looking back is a stark reminder of what can happen when you don't board the bandwagons ... look at those (myself included) who took 4-5 weeks to bring Kane in, missing out on a bundle of points and a cheap, reliable striker. If he were to score this weekend you'd have to keep him for the rest of the season, surely. If he blanks then most will lose him ... it's still a coin toss.

    9. Jinswick
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Nice post, and fully agree.

      I'm on a WC and the only single GWers (over the 5 weeks) I'm keeping are Aguero (explosive, in form and decent fixtures), Kane (still crazy value), and probably Silva (AVL and QPR in the next 3 being the main reason).

      Other than them it's 3 CHE, 3 LIV, 2 LEI, 2 SUN, 1 HUL & 1 ARS

      2 ARS to come in with freebies before GW37 and 1 spare to sort out any injuries/messes that come along.

    10. BeachBadger
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      i think this actually makes be feel better as a Non- WC owner. I think Im well set up for the remaining GWs. It's just this one Im worried about 😆

    11. The Enlightener
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Yeah. Get rid of Aguero and Silva before a home match against Villa. For who? I'm a non-WC manager, and I will have 3 Chelsea and 3 Liverpool for the DGW. On top of Aguero, Silva....and Kane, provided there isn't some news about an injury to keep one of them out. Who in God's name are WC'ers going to replace such hitters with? Vardy? N'Doye? You can have it both ways if you want. You don't have to lose big hitters just to load up on WC players. You might have a point about the Southampton defenders, but that's about it. A long post that, if I'm being honest, doesn't really say much of value.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Well it did come out longer than I expected. I'll try and be more articulate next time. 😉

        1. The Enlightener
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Please do. 😆 - - Nah. I get what you're saying to some degree, after reading all that for a second time! Just not sure it's as huge an advantage as it may seem. I know that often times when I wildcard, I wish I had another the very week after. 🙁

    12. Shifty
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Agree in essence - but it's important not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      Players like Silva and Aguero are proven FPL point scorers. Southampton defence still offers some value in players like Alde and Davis. Kane is still fighting for golden boot and is so highly owned...dropping him for Vardy/N'Doye is a disaster waiting to happen.

      More importantly for me, the WC is a tremendous opportunity to consolidate leads for MLs or set themselves up with enough differentials to make one last push. I think this is the main advantage for GW WCers.

    13. Billy Ketsu
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Excellent post, totally agree. Wild carders have such a great advantage it's painful to see so many with such poor teams. Come on people, get a grip.

      1. Shifty
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        what makes these particular WC teams poor in your opinion?

        1. Billy Ketsu
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          I wouldn't bother with Saints, Spurs, Palace, WBA, Arsenal keeper, more than Aguero from City and so on. People doing Kane to Vardy for a hit are nuts, I reckon. Seen a few of those on here. There's more than one way to do well, though, that's what makes the game fun.

      2. The Enlightener
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        How is their team going to be better by dropping the likes of Aguero, Kane, Silva...? Seems like people are expecting all the DGW players to go bonkers. Doesn't happen that way.

        1. Shifty
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          agree. 10 DGW players + Kun doesn't automatically mean it's better than say 8 DGW players + Silva, Kane, Southampton def.

          In essence, it's comparing Silva Kane SOT def vs Vardy/NDoye Cambiasso McShane...over simplistic but one can get the drift.

          1. Ryan
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Absolutely as others have said. I'll have 3 Chelsea 3 Liverpool and Aguero, Silva, Kane, Saints defender.

    14. Joggers Nipple
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Agree with a lot there Ruth. For us non wc holders a little planning was neded, ie last week used 2fts to get Fab and Huth.

      Im currently-

      Ming
      Huth Ivan Alderw
      Haz Fab Sterling Silva
      Aguero Kane Giroud

      Myhill Boyd PVA Hadria achieved with a -4

      Actually happy with this and if on a wc would only be looking at Kane and Alderw in the starting 11.

      What the WC gives is a chance to set Hadria to an ARS defence or Boyd to ARS mid getting you nice and set up for the next 5, as you said.

      Achiving a good team this week is fairly easy for all, you wc holders can now have your squad set for the next 5 with transfers to deal with injuries etc.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Mignolet-Myhill is an excellent pairing. But only 2 Liverpool seems a miss.

        I think on a wildcard you'd want to change Boyd and Haidara at least. Cambiasso for Boyd would allow you to bench Kane and play 3-5-2. Haidara could become a useful rotator with good fixtures like Vlaar.

        That would leave a decently well set team though still with only 2 Liverpool. But with a wildcard more radical changes could also be made. Kane to N'Doye and bench Giroud this week for example. Toby to Skrtel or Moreno for example. Not essential changes by any means but ones you would surely consider if transfers were free.

    15. RubeRx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Agree for the most part, WC holders have a distinct advantage right now but it will only benefit those who use it properly, keeping the rest of the season in mind, instead of just this DGW as you stated.

      Also, I wanted to let you know I always appreciate a comprehensive and introspective post. Even if they are a bit controversial. They are quite rare around these parts. Hope you don't get dissuaded by some of the clowns that lurk around here and keep sharing your thoughts.

      Have you ever posted on FantasyPL subreddit? There are thousands of people in that community who would value your insight.

    16. Christina.
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      I don't have a WC and I'm most probably not hanging on to Kane for this specific reason. Neither am I getting any Saints defensive cover(Yes, I still own Forster...lol)at this late stage.

      I'm happy not to own a WC at this stage.

    17. OShaughnessy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Mods... How is this a *Hot Topic* for discussion?

      6 paragraphs to effectively say:

      WC teams can get a fresh set of players to best take advantage of the final 5 weeks of the season.

      What's up for debate here?

      Slow news day I guess?

      1. The Enlightener
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Yeah. No offense to Ruth, but I wondered the same thing.

        1. OShaughnessy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          I don't disagree with a word but, this isn't some revelation either?

          We talk all year about what's best: an Early, Double Xmas or Late WC...

      2. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        And yet look at the level of discussion generated 🙂

        1. OShaughnessy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Think that's more proof of people being drawn to a Hot Topic, than it is the subject matter being discussed though, right? (or in my case, it's just another excuse to hear my own voice 😉 )

          Hot Topics typically should have some back & forth to them...

          In this instance though, I don't see many people arguing a case for using their WC in order to keep all the same players they already have...

          Although, I think we'd all love to see that...
          Team that never needed their WC activities it in GW38, but keeps their current squad intact.
          Because eff it, you can't take the WC with you!

    18. Jive Turkey
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      I don't know about you but I'd be glad to see the competition "waste" wildcards, not sure why it bothers you how others choose to construct their teams for the run in.

      Would non-wildcarders love a wildcard now, of course. Does having one guarantee great scores gw 34-38? Course not.

      The major point here is, truth be told the dgw hasnt turned out to be the massive dgw people were hoping for, and most serious players would have planned sufficient to have/get in 6-7 key dgwers.

      Highly doubt that non-wildcarders are losing any sleep over being short a lei and/or a hull player vs a Silva/Kane/Giroud/Clyne.

      Usually enjoy your posts, but this one....much ado about nothing imho of course.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        I didn't ask for it to be hulked. 😉

        It was just some musings about the different attitudes to specific players I am seeing on here at the moment. I think there are at least 4 strategies going on:

        1. Radical wildcarders - using the wildcard to make substantial changes (I have replaced 10 of 15 players in my squad);
        2. Safety wildcarders - using the wildcard to tidy and progress their squads but tending to hold many of the "standard" high ownership assets (as mentioned above);
        3. Safety non-wildcarders - resisting hits this GW as far as possible (max -4), are probably well-planned in advance, probably will have 5-7 DGW players, many will own Remy;
        4. Radical non-wildcarders - willing to take a -8 or -12 to maximise the DGW and set up for the rest of the season.

        If many of the DGW players do well, 1 and 4 will win this week. If they don't and most of the 'classic' SGW players do well then 2 and 3 will come out better.

        These 4 types represent different circumstances and mindsets. I find that interesting and I especially find the psychological and strategic elements behind the mindsets interesting. But in any case way it's no wonder that consensus and agreement is in short supply right now.

        1. 42towels
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Good distinctions. Am #3.
          Articulating the social elements (rather than just psychological) for each of the categories could probably help people interpret advice.

        2. Jive Turkey
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Hope you didn't take what I posted the wrong way. Like I said, I'm generally a fan of your posts. They're generally thought provoking, just be wary of your writing style (comes over as matter of fact sometimes), and when its about an age old debate, i.e., wildcarding strategy, expect divided opinion.

          Didn't question the hulking. Mod has rightfully pointed out the discussion generated.

          I do hope that you continue to present your well substantiated positions to the community. Just work on figuring out when to be defensive, when to be gracious, and when to just plain ignore (re responses).

          The real donuts below are the ones discounting entitled opinion about discounting entitled opinion.

        3. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Really nice response that. I fully agree that we are all split into 4 camps this week which makes things really interesting. I'm very much a #3

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            ...which is why we have been at odds recently. 😉 A #3 and a #1 are really playing two different games almost.

            Actually that is what got me started on the OP. Usually you and I are in reasonable agreement but I noticed this week we aren't. I was wondering why and my musings came out of that.

            1. Ryan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              Yep, hit the nail on the head

    19. Patch
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Of course it's good having a wildcard to play now, but I think the point some have been making is that it seems wildcarders' heads have been turned by the DGW fixtures and they've lost sight of both player form and the 5 week stretch you refer to (*cough* Granville? *cough*). The question is whether the DGW will be fools gold and some wildcarders will be sat here this time next week contemplating taking hits to ship out their Liverpool and Leicester players (and, if Chelsea have wrapped up the title, possibly Chelsea players).

    20. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Makes me feel better about dumping Silva. I too see this week as the start of a five gameweek season - unfortunately not with a wildcard - so taking a few hits instead to set myself up for a fun final five.

    21. A.T
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      As regards to my own team, I'm setting it up nicely for the final 5 games and all it will cost me is a maximum of 12 points. I'm not sure if had a WC my team would be that different so I have effectively bought one on the cheap. I've covered the main players needed and accept I could be down by approximately 12 points (hopefully) on my closest rivals by the end of the GW. I'm happy with that because I made about 40-50 points on them by playing it in GW30 when no-one else did!
      That's right, I'm a bloody genius 😀

      However if it does go tits up you won't see me till August so best of luck everyone and have a nice summer. 😉

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        You knew some of the GW33/GW34 blanks and doubles before GW31 so you effectively are doing a 2-stage wildcard process. Essentially your -8 or -12 this week will mainly be taking account of Liverpool-Hull I imagine.

        A wildcard played pre-31 probably worked out brilliantly if you had Benteke, Austin and Phillips in your team. In fact can we roll time back to then so I can do the same?

        1. A.T
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          I had Benteke and Phillips but gambled against Austin unfortunately. Actually looking back I've only gained about 30 odd points so really things are still very much in the balance.

    22. Jafalad
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Gawd, there are some donuts on here. 😡

      Ruth, this is a fine observation and you should be congratulated for your analysis. Both informative and perceptive in equal measure.

      I have long argued the point that the tail end of the season is a time to "free ride." By this I mean, a chance to climb the rankings by getting in differentials or "one offs" as there is little to be gained from playing fixtures three or four times ahead of you. Although this season, there is the dwg in 37, which can not be ignored imo.

      The wildcarders have a massive advantage in my opinion. They can stack up on the dgwers and position their teams for remainder of the season. For those of us looking to climb the rankings, this is our time and we be make or break for many.

      Good work, girlfriend.

      1. Christina.
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Can I keep Baines?

        PS: Did we break up...?

        😕

        1. Jafalad
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          No and no 😉

    23. Differential Equation 42
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      So True!

    24. Barry Woj
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Great post and I totally agree... just really wish I had one!

    25. Enzo the Baker
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      @Mods :

      I think you should do a better job protecting Ruth on discussions like this. Commenters like Acquafresca add nothing to this conversation, usually take a quick jibe at the poster and then disappear. Sure Acqua might have a history of posting long articles on other websites, but just because he has a recognizable username, he gets away with / upvoted on useless comments. I know you can't remove such comments because they don't violate your T&C's, but you could at least comment on the same thread showing some support for the OP.

      I understand that a lot of people here think that Ruth should lighten up a bit and not respond to criticism, I agree with this to some extent. However, the guy has posted some thought provoking topics lately and broken up the monotony of multiple repetitive RMWCTs. As a community, we might be in danger of losing posters like him if the mods just sit by and watch once-respected members of the community reply with "Cry me a river.." / tl;dr and get ghost upvotes

      1. FBorges
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        +1

      2. Woeisme
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        +1

      3. Jafalad
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Well said. There are a couple of trolls on here who just come on to say the post says adds "nothing new" and questioning the hulking of the post.

        Obviously, they haven't even read the fecking post.

        Someone needs to have a word with these idiots.

    26. Kalix
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Good stuff Ruth!

    27. Lord John Marbury
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Excellent artice. I'm on a wildcard and struggling to resist the temptation to throw in 3 Leicester and a token Hull player just because I can. This doesn't really make sense if you take a 5 game approach.

      I've mapped my team for GW34 (with an eye on GW37) then plotted forward to see what 3 transfers can give me in GW37 and whether the timing works.

      I'm definately holding Kun, Sanchez and Kane. Silva is a big issue for me. I shipped him out earlier this week, but may bring him back tonight as I do think over 5 gameweeks he still has appeal.

    28. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Thanks.
      At the start of this week my TV was 107.4.
      It's now 105.8... yikes.
      Said goodbye to Clyne, Silva & Kane amongst others, it's time to be brave.

    29. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Superb post

      I wholeheartedly agree and approve

      The only SGWer in my team is likely to be Kun, and I can get 3 or 4 for 37

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Yep. I think for a "radical wildcarder" (see above) 10 DGW players is probably where it ends up. I am doing that too with Kun as my only SGW player but I'll have 3 Arsenal from next week and most likely 2 or 3 Sunderland in place by 37 (depending on whether I decide I want them).

        The only fixture I'm worried about losing Kane for is GW37 against Hull. But my plans allow me to bring in my choice of Kane or DGW Defoe that week and it's a decision I'll make based on form and prospects at that time. Losing Southampton defence doesn't worry me at all, I think Skrtel is a way better option than Clyne/Bertrand over the final 5 GWs.

        1. JK - Cønt ⭐
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          agreed

          my only dilemma is whether to get a DGW striker and swap to Giroud later, or a Hull defender and bench Giroud this week but save myself a transfer later down the line

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            I had exactly that same issue but with different players. I wanted to keep Rooney and bench him this week but that meant 2 Arsenal to bring in and also forced compromises elsewhere (Ramsey instead of Sanchez).

            In the end I decided to keep Giroud on the bench and lose Rooney. And the clincher was it saves a FT later on as I will only have 1 Arsenal left to bring in (Fabregas to Sanchez next week).

    30. DMil
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Most keen managers not on a WC will have prepared their teams for this DGW and DGW 37 and will be prepared to take a couple of hits. It would be interesting to see how many of the top 1K have a wildcard left.

      1. A.C. Spider Baby
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Yup - it's a fascinating and pivotal week!

      2. Ruth_NZ
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        The Liverpool-Hull game was rescheduled late and comes immediately after a blank for both teams. That has helped wildcarders and made the job harder for non-wildcarders.

    31. GENERATION X
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      The only thing us non WCs have is the fact that the DGWs are playing each other a lot in upcoming fixtures so there should be some cancelling out.

      1. A.C. Spider Baby
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        In fairness - Liv, Che & Lei have lovely soft landings after the double as well. The it's stright swaps to the big boys for Ars.

        It's a triple whammy for WCers. Hul - Not so much.

    32. WINNING!
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      To do nothing at all is the most difficult thing in FPL, the most difficult and the most productive at times.

  6. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Here's The Puntmaster with his trio of differentials for Gameweek 34.

    http://buff.ly/1Dqamuj

  7. brianutd-why always we? 20
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Early bird

  8. The Light Knight
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    *Foxy machines

  9. super zlatan
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    On wildcard.

    Midfield at the moment is

    Haz. Fab. Sterling. Henderson. Boyd

    No silva or Sanchez worries me.

    With doing fab > Sanchez and having terry as my third Chelsea player along with haz and ivanovic?

    1. Mílanista
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      I'd rather have Silva then turn Sterling into Sanchez GW36.

      1. Andy1
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Me. Too

      2. super zlatan
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Is silva likely to play this week?

        I assume everyone waiting for the pressers before making a decision

        1. Mílanista
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yeah, wait for pressers of course but it sounds like he's fine.

          1. super zlatan
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Cheers milanista.

            Thoughts on this potential WC team?

            Kasper
            Ivan. Terry. Skrtel
            Hazard. Silva. Sterling. Henderson. Cambiasso
            Aguero. Kane

            Subs. Panti. Giroud. PvA. Duff

            1. Mílanista
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              Looks good SZ, seems to have everything covered.

  10. Mílanista
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    When is The Machine making an appearance on the Scoutcast?

    1. super zlatan
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Never mind the machine.

      Any word on zlatan making an appearance in scoutcast?

    2. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      The Machine/s will take over this site, careful what you wish for..

  11. brianutd-why always we? 20
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    What is the general consensus on Silva starting? Yes/no

    1. Mílanista
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Yes

    2. super zlatan
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      See above. I need to know this also

    3. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Reckon he will (and hope he will!)

    4. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Don't see any reason why he wouldn't much to my annoyance.

    5. brianutd-why always we? 20
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Cheers all. I think he will start, hope so.

  12. roghippo
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Defo Silva will start

    1. super zlatan
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      How do you know this?

      1. Debauchy
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Like to know this also ?

  13. Evasivo
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    The communities opinion of the below team would be appreciated, any suggestions of a hit or stick? Would ideally like to keep 1.5mil for Remy >Giroud next gw

    Panti Mannone
    Fonte Alderwiereld Morgan Baird Bellerin
    Hendo Fabs Hazard Boyd Sanchez
    Kane Remy Aguero
    £1.5ITB and 0FT

    1. super zlatan
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Defence needs some work.
      Remy is a headache. I would ship him

    2. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Think Giroud can wait. I ( and The Machine ) will Cpt Sterling , so would go Sanchez to Sterling -4

      1. Evasivo
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        I'm probably going to captain Hazard so maybe Alderweireld to Moreno, though prefer Lovren's budget!

        1. Debauchy
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Ok , yeah, then liking Moreno myself . See him getting something to QPR the following gw also ?

  14. Connor's Calling
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Play Sanchez or Kane this week?

    1. super zlatan
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Kane given his ownership.

      1. DA Minnion (Former great)
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Kane

    2. Colonel Shoe 肝池
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      sanchez probably

  15. La Roja
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Mario Gomez goal

    1. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Hit the button.
      Got that grav yet ?

      1. Debauchy
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        hit

  16. schlupptheweek
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    First film I see at the Odean in Liverpool and I get a picture with Balotelli. For some reason he went to Nandos only for five minutes but he's quite a nice guy. Shame Rodgers is useless and can't get the best out of him.

    1. Spectrum-FFS Doubles Champ
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      He must be a fast eater

  17. DA Minnion (Former great)
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Dawson and silva to Terry and Henderson for - 8 gives me

    Krul
    Ivan skrtel Terry (fonte baird )
    Hazard sterling Henderson Albrighton ( Ramsey )
    Kane aguero vardy

    Is it worth doing.cheers fellas

    1. Je suis le chat
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Can you afford Migs and Fabregas instead? 1 Che defender enough methinks - poor away record vis a vis cleanies.

  18. andy85wsm
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    So if Remy is declared fit I'm probably going -8 including a Leicester defender.

    Who we thinking - still Schlupp?

    1. Colonel Shoe 肝池
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      may as well, tho i prefer morgan/huth

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        I'd briefly forgotten about Huth actually, probably who I'll go for

  19. http.naypex
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    G2G?

    Davis K
    Skrtel ivan wolly
    Hazzard (C) silva bolasie sterling
    Kun kane murray

  20. Hairy Potter
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Don't want to take any more hits this week and happy with my DGW players, but struggling with choosing my eleven.

    Need to choose 2 from Bertie, Toby, Wolly or Zouma.

    Need to choose 2 from Kane, Sanchez or Walters.

    I'm torn as think Stoke will beat Sunderland and Wolly and Walters could be differentials.

  21. Jonny Sutt
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Any1 not going with hazard captain?

    1. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Getting very tempted by Sterling.

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Tempted by Skrtel more tbh!

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Not worth the risk for me

      2. Bojaninho
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        whats the temptation? Fixtures, positioning?

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Pretty much. Just a gut feeling too.

          I think I'll probably end up on Hazard though

  22. Viper
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Good to go? -4 point hit.

    Krul

    Terry Schlupp Skrtel (Bruce, PVA)

    Sterling Hazard(c) Silva Fabregas (Boyd)

    Aguero Vardy Kane

    1. t4thomas
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      You have done very well to get 7 DGWers with just a -4. Good work.

      1. Viper
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Cheers. Hoping this can be the week I can pull away from rivals

  23. Rui
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Henderson or Coutinho? Money no issue.

    Cheers.

    1. Viper
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Coutinho

    2. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Coutinho for me

    3. Je suis le chat
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Coutinho

    4. Rui
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Thanks guys

    5. brianutd-why always we? 20
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Hendo

  24. Ibracadabra´s Spell
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Fab (DGW) or Silva (Aston Villa HOME)??

    1. Colonel Shoe 肝池
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      fab

      1. Ibracadabra´s Spell
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Ok, thanks. 🙂

  25. t4thomas
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    ALL DONE.

    Davis
    Ivanovic | Terry | Moreno
    Sanchez | Hazard | Henderson | Sterling
    Aguero | Giroud | Vardy

    Huth | Phillips | Duff | Gilks

    0.2M.

    1. Whazza
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Play Huth over Sanchez

      1. t4thomas
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Reckon??

        1. Whazza
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yes! The defender with the most goalthreat lately playing twice va Sanchez one game vs a Mourinho bus. Can't see Arsenal scoring more than one, maybe not even one.

    2. Mr. O'Connell
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Sweet. I'd downgrade some of those bench players (Huth and Phillips) and get a DGW keeper and bench Davis. But that is close to perfect IMO.

    3. Viper
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Very nice. I'd also be tempted to play Huth over an Arsenal player

    4. t4thomas
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Thanks All.

      I have been desperate to get Huth on.

      You've given me an excuse now... Sanchez to bench.

    5. t4thomas
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      EVEN MORE ALL DONE

      Davis
      Ivanovic | Terry | Moreno | Huth
      Sanchez | Hazard | Henderson | Sterling
      Aguero | Giroud | Vardy

      Sanchez | Phillips | Duff | Gilks

      0.2M.

      Does feel a bit criminal coming out of a WC with a 4-4-2, but needs must.

      1. Mr. O'Connell
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Go Phillips to Grealish and get Schmeichel for an extra DGW. Saints are done.

        1. t4thomas
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Yeah, tempting move actually.

          I just fancy Phillips to get a few assists... Not been getting on board with this grealish love. AVs fixtures pretty ropey too.

          I could just do Davis --> Schmeichel.

          1. Mr. O'Connell
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            Yeah fair enough I suppose. But are you likely to play Phillips over Vardy in any matches. Get Grealish and upgrade Gilks to Panti and do Davis to Schmeichel then you have a DGW37 player and the perfect team (my team).

            1. t4thomas
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              10 years, 7 months ago

              Now you're talking.

              1. t4thomas
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 13 Years
                10 years, 7 months ago

                Ah wait, then no cash for Sterling --> Giroud.

                Back to Schmeichel only plan.

                1. t4thomas
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 13 Years
                  10 years, 7 months ago

                  * Ramsey.

                  1. Mr. O'Connell
                    • 13 Years
                    10 years, 7 months ago

                    Downgrade Huth and play Sanchez to fund the keepers move

          2. ellelelle
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 7 months ago

            I like the Phillips punt.. I think QPR will play aggressively now. Grealish might be better value but I'd fancy Phillips to get more!

        2. t4thomas
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 7 months ago

          Or Panti?

  26. DV8R
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Would you go for a GK pairing of Pants/Schmeichel if it meant getting Sanchez/Giroud/Ramsey for the other DGW?

    The other option is Migs/Myhill and getting Kosielny instead of Ramsey.

    1. brianutd-why always we? 20
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      First one

    2. ellelelle
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Pants and Schmeichel works better I think.

  27. Bojaninho
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    mandess to Hutton>Schlupp for -4

    1. wolves_simmo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Do it!!

    2. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Nope.
      He should make up the - 4 quite easily imo , over Hutton , over the rest of the season

    3. Je suis le chat
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Reckon Hutton to Huth better for baps and goal threat

  28. gers23
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 7 months ago

    Hows this team for a -4?

    Mignolet

    Bruce Terry Bertrand

    Hazard Sterling Silva Siggy

    Kane Aguero Giroud

    Myhill Boyd Toby Pva

    1. GHB
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 7 months ago

      Would probably do additional -4 siggy> hendo

      1. gers23
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 7 months ago

        Thinking about that move.Thanks m8