Members
19 February 2017 1623 comments
Paul Paul
Share:

Written off as relegation certainties just over a month ago, Hull City’s survival bid has been given a significant shot in the arm since the arrival of new manager Marco Silva.

Two wins and a draw in five matches under the Portuguese’s stewardship, supplemented by clean sheets against the likes of Mancheser United and Liverpool, have seen many Fantasy Premier League managers assess the KCOM outfit in a new light.

Key to Hull’s appeal is, of course, that they play in both Gameweek 26 and 28 – indeed, Silva’s men are one of just eight sides currently set to feature in the latter round of matches.

As the interest starts to escalate in light of this weekend’s FA Cup results, we cast an eye over Hull’s recent matches, comparing the numbers to their previous statistics for signs of progress, while checking out the Tigers’ chief performers as we look to navigate the tricky upcoming schedule.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

  1. leocarter27
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Peoples thoughts on Firmino? Is he a good alternative to Mane? Or is Mane essential?

    1. how now brown cow
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think Livepool midfield a lottery, but Mane seems the most direct player. If you can afford it I would choose him.

    2. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Liverpool midfield lottery.

    3. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      It wouldn't surprise me if Firmino outscores Mane.

      I'm still going Mane but Firmino is a good differential

      1. Leaf
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I'm going Firmino

        Better player , .....and a bit cheaper

        1. JAC THE CAT
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Superb option.

          I'm still looking at ways to see if I can get both.

    4. Legomane
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      He's a good value option if things click again

    5. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I like Firmino. But I might look at getting both in.

  2. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Top quality article this - been struggling to get to grips with the new Hull myself and this really helps. Cheers

    1. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Some bargains in the Hull ranks

      1. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Definitely looks that way, I'm always so slow to react to shifts like this one so it's really nice to get a whole article telling me to cop on

    2. Leaf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I'm getting Maguire , has the stats , passed the eye test

      And I have a mate who is best mates with a Hull player ...who raves about Maguire

      1. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Amat to Maguire more or less penciled in for me at this stage

        1. Leaf
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          I'm doing that same thing

          Amat somehow has been there the whole season

          1. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Not sure I'll cope without the solidity and consistency he has provided me. Been my rock

    3. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Not sure I need any unfortunately. Good options but with Heaton playing in 28 I'll probably focus on other teams

  3. Dutchboy
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Llorente or Carroll?

    1. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Carroll

    2. Dutchboy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I don't have Sigurdsson

    3. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Still Carroll

    4. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Carroll, if playing

  4. The Bandit
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Just because I'm not a casual doesn't mean I don't need spoon feeding. Keep 'em coming 😉

    1. Leaf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Casual

      1. The Bandit
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Actually, only Ibra without a game next week and already got 10 for gw 28. Beginners luck 😛

        1. Leaf
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Ahead of the game

          I take it back , please accept my humble apologies

          1. The Bandit
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            That's the easy bit, getting rid for the dgw's without a wc may prove a little trickier!

            1. Leaf
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Yes that's the tricky bit

              I have 3 West Brom , 3 Everton who will have to be eased out quite quickly

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Baggies are the problem I think. Fixtures a bit of a horror show.

                1. Leaf
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 16 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  Mcauley and foster should be benchable

                  Will be a great day when I finally sell Rondon

                  1. how now brown cow
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    I've got Phillips & Fletcher. Lol.

  5. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Is Phillips likely to lose his place at wba?

    Could cause unnecessary problems for lots of us....

    1. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I very much doubt it.

      He's still playing well, just not in terms of FPL points.

    2. ThisTimeNxtYrRodney
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Not after this next round. IMO think he will do well. He has been a little unlucky. He will come back soon.

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Good reassuring

  6. The Royal Robin
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Pick one to PLAY:

    A) Defoe
    B) Phillips
    C) Brunt (I have Foster in goal)

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      C

    2. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Defoe

    3. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Defoe

  7. Puzzle
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Transfer plan:

    Defoe, Sanchez -> Mane, Costa 2FT. Thoughts?

    1. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Solid moves

    2. Voodoo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Good plan.

    3. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Not sure. Maybe just do Sanchez > Mane

  8. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Liking the look of markovic...

    May get him for stanis this week for a hit....

    Fixtures are great...he is cheap...doesn't blank....and could be explosive differential..

    Anyone else looking his way?

    1. Legomane
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think I'd be tempted to punt on him as a 5th mid if he was 4.something. 5.4, not so much!

  9. Visionaries
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Sanchez & Niasse --> Mane & Kane for -8?

    1. The Bandit
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Not insane

      1. Visionaries
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks, seems a little bit crazy to me, but I'm tempted. Though Kane isn't playing on gw28..

    2. KISSES
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Getting rid of Niasse?

      1. Visionaries
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Well, I don't' want to but I think Kane might have a field day against Stoke. Already have Luk and Costa

    3. Yank Revolution
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Like

  10. Legomane
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    *Heaton (Pickford)
    Alonso *Coleman *Holgate *Smith (Pieters)
    Hazard Eriksen Alli *Phillips (de Roon)
    Costa *Lukaku (Ibrahimovic)

    0 FT 1.2 ITB
    Anything worth a hit this week, or just let de Roon or Pieters cover Holgate etc? Cheers!

    OUT
    A. *Holgate
    B. Pieters

    IN
    1. *Brunt (3wk punt)
    2. *Maguire
    3. *Robertson

  11. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    GW28 seriously sucks for striker options

    1. Legomane
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Just a load of Kak

    2. The Bandit
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Yep, probably 4-5-1 with double Liv mids is the way to go unless Big Dawg is fit and firing

      1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah - may well do the same - I can't see any I want other than Lukaku at the mo

    3. how now brown cow
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Think I'm benching Ibra & Costa and just going Lukaku up top.

      City unexpectedly losing replay and it all changes....

    4. JAC THE CAT
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Lukaku and A.Carroll only options for me.

      1. Geoff
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        this

    5. Lawrø
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      That's why I think I'm going to bank a FT and play 1-4-4-1... Strikers just aren't worth it

    6. Richd
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Big Ashley Barnes bra!

      1. Dazzler365
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Vs pool tho brah?

  12. Proietti
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Best midfielder for £4.6m or less?

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Probably Fletcher based on fixtures over weeks 26 and 27 and he will play week 28. Then move him on. Other option is Carroll (SWA) and their fixtures not bad going forward

    2. Zlat-man
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Morrison?

      1. We Will Klopp you
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Costs £4.7m

  13. Magic Hat
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Is Mane essential? Signing Coutinho means I can afford Costa. Signing Mane leaves me scrambling for a 9.5 striker or a Hull defender. The latter is more appealing. So...

    a) Costa + Coutinho
    b) Mane + Costa + Maguire (-4)
    c) Mane + Maguire

    Curse you Lincoln!

    1. Visionaries
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      B

    2. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      C for mr

      1. dunas_dog
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        *me

        1. dunas_dog
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          *sorry read post again and I would say B. Although not sure what rest of your teamis

    3. Patio Kev
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I don't think Mane is essential at all, the whole Liverpool midfield is a complete lottery.

      Could easily be Firmino's or Courtino's or even be Lallana's turn for a brace next week.

    4. Voodoo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      b

  14. Jay_
      9 years, 1 month ago

      After the 28 blanks, all eyes (and transfers) turn to dgw34.

      I think we need Boro to beat City in the QF's. If City win that tie, it looks like Boro are going to be one of the few teams that has a double in 34 (SUN, bou) (along with either Man UTD or Chelsea and Watford).

      Boro have a nice little run between 31-33 too (swa, hul, BUR). The problem is, they don't score goals and their defence don't really look too good lately either. Plus they've got hard games in 29 (MNU), 33 (ARS) and 35 (MNC) awkwardly situated around the the double and that nice 3 run game.

      A surprise Boro win in the Cup would give us a City dgw 34 (STO, WBA). Plus City would still have another double to be played in 37. So it's worth cheering Boro on when it comes to the next round of the cup, as I'd much rather be planning to transfer in Sterling and Aguero than Negredo and DeRoon after the big blank in 28.

      1. Pasqualinho
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Every Huddersfield fan hates you right now.

      2. Art Vandelay
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Or city just lose to Huddersfield.

      3. how now brown cow
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I think DGW34 could be a damp squib. Potentially only Utd or Chelsea are interesting, and most people will have 1 or 2 of each of them by then anyway.

      4. Jimmers
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        City progressing in the CL would heighten the prospects of Boro beating City in the cup (if of course they beat Huddersfield first :))

      5. Patio Kev
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I honestly can't think that far ahead right now, think we should get a better idea after GW28 so plenty of time to wildcard into a DGW team.

        Wouldn't be too keen on triple Boro though..,.....

      6. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Two City doubles could be sweet, particularly that (STO, WBA)

        1. The Bandit
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Good luck finding anyone worth having who will play both 😉

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Ain't that the truth. Fernandinho, anyone? 🙂

          2. *sigh*
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Sane will be the one to bring in

    • Patio Kev
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Ok so let's assume both Arsenal & Man City go through in the FA Cup and so we are left with just the 4 fixtures we already know about.

      What do people think the optimal first 11 dream team for GW28 will be assuming the usual rules on formation, 3 per team and within budget ?

      I think mine would be (based on my expectations that WHU, Everton & Liverpool will win and I have no idea who will win between Hull v Swansea so maybe a draw:

      Randolph ????
      Baines / Coleman / Mawson ????
      Mane / Firmino / Courtino / Siggy / Antonio
      Lukaku / Carroll

      Of these I think only the Liverpool Mids, Lukaku and maybe an Everton defender or Siggy will be essential. I can easily see 7 or 8 players being enough for that week.

      1. how now brown cow
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I think if you have 11 playing in gw28, you are probably doing something wrong.

        1. The Bandit
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Don't agree, especially with the added Liverpool game and gw34 damp squib comment above

          1. how now brown cow
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I guess as ever it depends which 11 - unless you are playing a w straight after.

            eg I will get Siggy in as he's got fixtures and form, but I;m not convinced having a number of wba players is worth it.

            1. The Bandit
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              I've already got ten so won't be selling any of them, wouldn't be rushing to buy most of them in though

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                If fate/planning hands you a ready made team then great!

                I'm not in that place though.

          2. Pasqualinho
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I'd agree. DGWs with crap teams can prove lucrative too. Look at Villa/QPR a few seasons back. Ignoring them can come back to bite.

            1. how now brown cow
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Ha. Yes. The one time I didn't get benteke.

        2. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          You'd definitely want to be rocking a gw29 wildcard anyway

          1. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Reply fail to brown cow re: 11 gw28 playerd

            1. The Bandit
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              It wasn't a reply fail 😉

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Reply-fail-fail. 🙂

              2. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
                • 9 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                I would offer to see myself out, but I'm no longer confident I could find the door

        3. Jigger & Pony
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          This

        4. Ruth_NZ
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah. Like it's a bad idea to have 11 players scoring points. 😕

          Managers will fall all over themselves for an extra player/game in a DGW but will happily go short by 2, 3 or 4 player/games in GW28. Where's the logic in that?

          There will be big swings in GW28. Personally I intend to be on the right side of them if possible. 🙂

          1. how now brown cow
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I'm not saying go 7 or 8, but I think filling 11 spaces for the sake of it is pointless if you then take hits to remove them again.

            If it's players you want to get in anyway then great.

            1. Ruth_NZ
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Ummm... didn't you say "if you have 11 playing in GW28 you are doing something wrong"?

              Maybe I misread.

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Ok. Too much a sweeping statement I'll grant you - I did say probably!

                Given the teams who are playing, I just think it's hard to engineer a strong XI that will see you through the next few weeks (unless City or Arsenal slip up). An extra 2-4 pts could be easily eclipsed by having to make extra transfers.

                My opinion only.

          2. Patio Kev
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            But if that 11 players includes taking hits to get in Swansea or Hull defenders is it really worth it ?

            Chelsea are at Stoke in GW29 for example, is it worth getting rid of Chelsea players to just have to buy them back the following week ? Likewise Arsenal are at West Brom.

            1. Ruth_NZ
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Who said anything about hits? Personally I have 9 already with 3 FTs left. But that's not really the point. I'm just arguing against the idea that fielding 11 = doing something wrong.

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Hands up - I admit defeat!

              2. My Name Is Prince
                • 13 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Fielding 11 is doing something wrong though, I agree with How Now here (well, agreed, as he just admitted defeat)... It would be doing something wrong as well to get a player who's not likely to be a great option going forward even if he had a DGW... Last season proves this, actually, as many would have been better off just keeping their Spurs players instead of getting Everton/Liverpool assets who just got rotated... And I know, for GW28 rotation isn't even an issue... But still, Hull, West Ham, Swansea, Bournemouth, Burnley, hardly teams that have the strongest fantasy assets... Granted, you can have a few, some defenders you can bench and so on, but 11? Something wrong there me thinks...

              3. Patio Kev
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                I don't think there is anything wrong with fielding 11 at all if you can get there with no hits.

                It's getting rid of them afterwards that looks tricky again with no hits. Liverpool are away at Man City the following week whilst WBA fixtures take a big turn for the worst.

                If you can get 11 with no hits and then intend to WC GW29 into a team full of DGW players then that looks a good strategy.

                But I honestly cannot see 11 players I would want for GW28 anyway.

          3. My Name Is Prince
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Completely depends on the players/teams in question, can't just compare any player to any player.... In GW28, there are not too many players that you'd want in DGW either, only the Everton players, that's 3, Liverpool, that's 3, and then a few others perhaps... Hardly 11 though... That's the logic matey!

          4. My Name Is Prince
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            "Managers will fall all over themselves for an extra player/game in a DGW but will happily go short by 2, 3 or 4 player/games in GW28. Where's the logic in that?"

            I agree that there's no logic in that, however this statement doesn't suggest that it's not doing something wrong to field 11 players for GW28... It could be wrong to fall all over yourself to field an extra player for a DGW as well, as I said, depends on the players in question...

        5. Patio Kev
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          I agree with this, I honestly cannot see a team of 11 players I would feel comfortable with that week especially if you have to take hits to get them in and if you are then stuck with them for GW29.

          Liverpool have got Man City away in GW29, I think I would want 2 FT that week to get rid of 2 of them.

          1. Patio Kev
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Reply fail to How Now Brown Cow

      2. Zlat-man
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Exctly my thought. Anything more than 8 seems enough.

        Plz chk my post too.

      3. ryacoo
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I think mine will be something like:

        Jakup
        Coleman, Baines, McAuley
        Siggy, T. Carroll, Mane, Coutinho, Phillips
        Lukaku, A. Carroll

      4. TopMarx
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        i've already got 8 for that week, I think Foster and WBA defenders a good option too in general. Thinking about bringing in Robertson too, I know Maguire is most people's first choice for a Hull defender but I think the full back will do well. Otherwise Liverpool mids are a must. Personally like Firmino and then Mane.

        1. Patio Kev
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Have you had a look at WBA fixtures from GW29 onwards, they aren't great ?

          I have a couple of WBA players too but I want to plan an exit strategy to get rid of them post GW28.

          1. ryacoo
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I have McAuley and Phillips and will have the spare cash to do Phillips to Sanchez in GW29. McAuley can be benched.

          2. TopMarx
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            i've had Foster for ages, will re-think when I WC ahead of DGW. Post GW 28 you are right and I doubt I will have any attacking players from WBA.

    • Zlat-man
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Would you get rid of anyone among these to get a gw 28 player?

      Alonso
      Walker
      Alli
      Hazard
      Crouch

      Can add 2mil to buy.
      Currently have
      { heaton brunt baines mane davies phil kaku robertson} = 8 gw28 player

      1. how now brown cow
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Maybe not this week.

        1. Zlat-man
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Not for this week obviously. I am all set for gw26.

          Just overall planning for gw28

          1. how now brown cow
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I'm planning Alli to Siggy. Crouch poor fixtures but too many great options.

            1. TopMarx
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              i'd agree with that

    • Voodoo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      At moment I would need to play Tom Carroll and Stanislas GW26...

      Thoughts on: Sanchez & Stanislas to Mane & Snodgrass (-4)?

      Cheers.

      1. TopMarx
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        depends a bit on the rest of your team but yes, seems sensible to me

    • Jigger & Pony
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      With GW37 likely to be the big DGW are we keeping our WCs till 35-36?

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Yes, as long big teams still have something to play for that later in the season.

        It's looking like only one of the top seven PL teams (United or Chelsea) will have a DGW34, so that's not looking overly appealing to me.

        1. Jigger & Pony
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Exactly

      2. Dr. Mantis Toboggan
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        No, I see the reasoning but would want more time to reap wildcard rewards

      3. Firminooooo
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Yes. Wildcard before Monster DGW37, and Benchboost with 15 DGW players. Ahhhhhh

        1. Vinyl78LP
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          ...but bear in mind your team may tank in Gw36 and Gw38 due to this tactic of utter focus on gw37's fixtures?

    • ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Heaton
      Alonso / Baines / McAuley / Friend
      Eriksen / Sigurdsson / Phillips / Carroll
      Kane / Defoe

      Jakupovic / Pieters / Sanchez / Ibra

      2ft, .8itb

      Sanchez and Defoe to Mane/Firmino and Lukaku the likely move?

      Who goes first, Friend or Pieters and for who?

      1. TopMarx
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Firmino and Lukaku sensible move.

        50/50 if pushed I'd probably keep Friend

        1. TopMarx
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          for Robertson.

    • nonprophet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      So do we know when double gameweeks Will be yet? I'm an aissue, who is trying to book my holidays around the double game weeks and don't want to miss out on those dates. Any info much appreciated

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        GW37 will be massive. GW34 will have some.

        1. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Some teams (Arsenal, City and United) are likely to have a third game that needs rearranging, so there's likely to be another DGW thrown in there somewhere.

        2. Gloria Kanchelskis
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          GW 34 may not have any. The FA could ....

          Move all the 34 weekend postponements back to later that week
          Move the 28 postponements to 37
          and they need to find a home for the Ars Soton games and the Manchester derby.
          Playing the Ars Soton game later in 26 works, leaving only the Manchester derby.

          It would be desperate for people like me who need two good dgw ro compensate for some poor choices earlier in the year but it makes a lot of sense to the FA

          1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Yep - they could do this - the GW34 games that need to be postponed will be known in GW28, so plenty of notice to move the GW34 games back a few days.

            With fixtures being rearranged it's sensible not to rule anything out!

      2. nonprophet
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        *Aussie

      3. nonprophet
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks guys

    • dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      So looks like best plan may be week 34 for TC and WC week 36 for BB week 37 ?

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Yup.....but early days...

      2. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        That's what i'm planning to do, GW36 may also be a DGW (like last year) if Arsenal, City or United have a third posponed game to be rearranged

      3. TopMarx
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        you'll have a better idea how to use the chips as the fixtures approach and you see which players are fit and in form. If there is a stand out TC option in GW34 I'd use it then.

        1. Numb
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          I would think everyone will be looking at Sanchez.

          1. bitm2007
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Arsenal are odds on to make the cup semi's, so Sanchez is only likely to have one game in GW34.

            1. Numb
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Is that how it works? But they'll have 2 DGWs somewhere, surely?

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                GW34 is FA Cup semi final. 37 and somewhere else.

              2. bitm2007
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Yes they will GW37 and GW36 (if it can be agreed with UEFA like last year) are likely, although a midweek fixture in GW26 is still a possibility.

                1. Numb
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  Thanks. Next week is surely too short notice?

                  1. bitm2007
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    It's not too a short notice for cup replays to be played then.

                2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  The PL dodged a huge fine last year after talks with UEFA - I doubt if those talks involved agreement for the PL to breach the rules again the very next season and get let off scott free. Teams can play Friday and Mondays easier now as well of course with FNF.

                  1. bitm2007
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    If Arsenal, City ot United have cup replays before making the semi's they may not have a choice.

                    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                      • 11 Years
                      9 years, 1 month ago

                      No replays in the QFs this year

                      1. bitm2007
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 11 Years
                        9 years, 1 month ago

                        That's not true, is it ?

                        1. bitm2007
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • 11 Years
                          9 years, 1 month ago

                          Thanks

            2. Numb
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              When will Arsenal's two DGWs be, assuming they get to the semis?

              1. how now brown cow
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                If they can square it with UEFA, Champions League nights are looking fairly free.

              2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                37 + TBC

                1. Numb
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  No best guess on the other? Like before or after 34?

                  1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    Nope 🙂

                    1. Numb
                      • 11 Years
                      9 years, 1 month ago

                      Ok thanks

              3. bitm2007
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                see above

              4. bitm2007
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Triple GW37 still an outside chance.

                1. how now brown cow
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  The promised land. Triple triple captain.

                  1. bitm2007
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    Fixture chaos due to cup replay's are probably our best chance as that.

                2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 1 month ago

                  Yep - Friday GW37, Monday GW37, Thursday GW37, Sunday GW38 would work.

                  1. bitm2007
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 1 month ago

                    It happened once before, Sunderland I think.

      4. Numb
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Probably so

    • Olee
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Does anyone know the status on Rose? without him i only have 10players this week, and i cant seem to find something conclusive!? When will he be able to play again?

      1. how now brown cow
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        "Progressing well". I think the Stoke game is the target but you'll have to wait for news

      2. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        There was talk he'd be fit for Stoke but nothing solid.

        1. Olee
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Feels bad if i only play 10this weekend, but really hopes he makes it. Cause i really wanna save so that i have 2fts before gw28. But thanks for intel 😀

    • Mickey Tyrion™
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Any ideas on the below guys? Really wanting to address my defense while keeping an eye on the blanks.

      2 FT and 0 ITB

      Heaton - Jaku
      Koscielny - Brunt - Pieters - Friend - Amat
      Sanchez - Alli - Lallana - Phillips - De Roon
      Lukaku - Ibra - Kane

      1. Numb
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Koscielny and Amat > whoever.

        1. Numb
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Coleman and Maguire?

          1. TopMarx
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Coleman and Robertson.

            I'm splitting hairs, I agree with the two out.

            1. Numb
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Yeah, whichever out of those two really

          2. Mickey Tyrion™
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            And leave the attack as is?

            1. Numb
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              You're defence is the issue I think

              1. Mickey Tyrion™
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Agree. Cheers.

    • FFSbet.com
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Phillips+Rondon > Firmino+Carrol (-8) leaves me with 0.0 ?
      Cant stand them anymore,will need to get rid of them after GW28 anyway.

      Mane/Hazard/Siggy/Alli
      Lukaku/Ibra

      1. TopMarx
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        not for -8

        1. FFSbet.com
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          I think they can cover that in next 3 GWs plus will need to spend 2 transfers on them after GW28 anyway.

          1. TopMarx
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            maybe just get Carroll if he's fit. -8 seems a lot and things change quickly in FPL

            1. FFSbet.com
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Ta

    • ♤TeddyBear♤
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Random Question on my mind.

      If a player takes a penalty and the keeper saves it .... then another player follows in the rebound.

      Does that player get -2 for missing the pen but 3 for the assist ?

      1. JJO
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        yes

        1. ♤TeddyBear♤
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Interesting. Thanks

        2. Numb
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          What if the pen taker deliberately touches the ball forward for a teammate to score. Will the pen taker get a pen miss and assist?

          1. Lawrø
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            We won't know for sure until it happens as it hinges on FPL's definition of "pen miss'' but I think it'd be unreasonable to give it as a miss as the player didn't shoot... FPL would be choosing to hold an untenable stance so I'd be very surprised to see it given as a miss.

      2. Lawrø
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I believe so

      3. Legomane
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        McAuley might 🙂

    • OptimusBlack
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Sorry Guys Can You Please till me who are teams Would play (Blank ) GW 28

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Hot topic

        1. OptimusBlack
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Thx Mr

    • Legomane
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Just seen the McAuley 'evidence' on the FPL show:

      "There is some doubt Evans goal was actually on target"

      Ok, in other words there's no evidence either way. IMO having seen the slow mo presented, without ACTUAL evidence to the contrary - simply, it's Evans' shot, therefore it's Evans' goal.

      Otherwise we have a silly situation where any defender or keeper that gets the slightest touch should be awarded an OG...

      Absolute shocker!

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Hard to get an angle on Evans header. Headed on McAuley is the only thing picked up.

        1. Legomane
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Yep, ergo Evans goal. Easy, and no need to pointlessly annoy anybody, even those who don't own any of the above like myself! Common sense, rather than trying to be too clever.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            McAuley got the last touch? Defenders don't aim to score own goals. Common sense would give the attacker a goal if their shot was on target.

      2. Numb
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I think Netflix will make a "Making a Murderer" style documentary about this one day. And then it will all come out, you mark (or is that Mark) my words.

        1. My Name Is Prince
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          A note to self: you're on your own in this world...

      3. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 19 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        The fact that Evans original effort may or may not have been on target is not a factor.

        "On target" is only a factor for own goals. Where the own goal is only given to the defender if the original effort is deemed off target.

        With the McAuley goal, he got the final touch on the original header therefore it's his goal. There doesn't need to be evidence of whether the orginal header is on target. It's not relevant.

        That's always been the case with goal awards. These days it's addressed immediately, previously it took days for the dubious panel to judge and come to these conclusions on tough calls.

        The piece on the show was to highlight that McAuley got the touch. However, by pointing out that the Evan's effort may have been off target underlines that the touch was not insignificant. Not really relevant, but a point of interest for those who wrote it off as a "skim off his hairline". It was much more than that - not that it matters - a minor touch, like Lukaku's on Bolasie's cross earlier in the season, is all that is required.

        1. Mark
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 19 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Also, the point of featuring it was to get across the point that the decision was not made by FPL. We wanted to communicate the role played by Opta and Match Centre in the awarding of the goal.

        2. Hibbo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          That Jules Breach is some bit of gear.

          Does she smell nice?

    • Man Chest Hair United
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Sanchez to mane for -4 or play de roon

      1. Legomane
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I'd take a hit. Have done in fact: Alexis > Eden

      2. Aubaaaaa
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Mane in

    • Aubaaaaa
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Play Mirallas or Crouch this weekend?

      1. Legomane
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Miralles

    • Dave1966
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Ibrahimovic out for Kane yes or no guys?

      1. Legomane
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Depends on rest of your team TBH

        1. Dave1966
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Heaton
          Walker, Funes Mori, David Luiz, Brunt, Reid
          Philips, Barkley, Sanchez, Erickson, Snodgrass
          Costa, Crouch

      2. Aubaaaaa
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Would keep Ibra for gw 27