Fixtures
22 March 2018 3325 comments
Paul Paul
Share:

After a long wait, we finally received confirmation of Double Gameweek 34 this afternoon.

Planning and preparation now gets underway in earnest as we assess the best ways to tackle the run-in after eight teams were handed a pair of fixtures in Gameweek 34.

Confirmed Double Gameweek 34 schedule
Bournemouth (liv MUN)
Brighton (cry TOT)
Burnley (LEI CHE)
Chelsea (sot bur)
Leicester (bur SOT)
Man United (WBA bou)
Southampton (CHE lei)
Spurs (MCI bha)

This leaves six matches still requiring a new date.

Chelsea vs Huddersfield
Leicester vs Arsenal
Man City vs Brighton
Swansea vs Southampton
Tottenham vs Newcastle
West Ham vs Man United

The Premier League have confirmed that these will be rescheduled by Tuesday April 3 – before Gameweek 33 – though it is now expected that those 12 teams will now face a Double Gameweek 37.

Providing they drop in Gameweek 37, the schedule would be as follows:

Potential Double Gameweek 37 schedule
Arsenal (BUR lei)
Brighton (MUN mci)
Chelsea (LIV HUD)
Huddersfield (mci che)
Leicester (WHU ARS)
Man City (HUD BHA)
Man United (bha whu)
Newcastle (wat tot)
Southampton (eve swa)
Swansea (bou SOT)
Tottenham (wba NEW)
West Ham (lei MUN)

This is the reverse of the previous school of thought, which had many managers making plans based on the assumption that 12 teams would be playing twice in Double Gameweek 34.

The surprise switch in today’s fixtures may now have many managers reassessing their plans for the run-in, particularly those who still have one or more of the Wildcard, Bench Boost and Free Hit chips in hand.

Earlier this week it was revealed that this is thought to be 12% of the top 10,000 managers and an estimated 20% of “active” managers.

Significantly, some 52,000+ have already played their Wildcard since the Gameweek 31 deadline passed, perhaps expecting that the likes of Arsenal and Man City to also be handed a Double Gameweek 34. Indeed, Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang is the most signed ahead of a return to domestic action, claiming over 125,000 new owners so far.

Immediately, you can see that today’s confirmation has made matters far more difficult for those without the Free Hit chip who were targeting the Gunners’ striker for an expected Double Gameweek 34.

Arsenal were previously one of six teams – along with Burnley, Man City, Newcastle, Swansea and West Ham – who were all expected to have a Double Gameweek 34 and also play in Gameweek 35.

Now, however, that applies only to Burnley.

Without the Free Hit, managers will have to balance their building for the Double Gameweek and then use transfer hits to repair the squad ahead of the Gameweek 35 postponements. What’s more, with the likes of Arsenal and Man City treated to favourable fixtures, a Free Hit in Gameweek 35 could prove even more devastating than the success story that was Gameweek 31.

Certainly, for those still holding their Bench Boost chips, Gameweek 34 was the favoured window prior to today’s reveal.

Now, though, with five of the top six sides – Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City, Man United and Spurs – all likely to play twice in Gameweek 37, some will be setting their sights on the latter round instead.

Indeed, City, United and Spurs all face a pair of opponents outside of the top eight and will clearly offer huge points potential.

Much depends on the state of your squad, of course, and the number of chips still at your disposal. Indeed, this afternoon’s news could provide food for thought for those managers who avoided “dead-ending” their squads in Gameweek 31 and have yet to play the Wildcard.

Should they now favour Double Gameweek 37, they could now play the Free Hit Chip in Double Gameweek 34, with the Wildcard in Gameweek 36 and Bench Boost in Gameweek 37.

On the other hand, while the allure of Double Gameweek 37 may be greater on paper, the reality could be that, by then, many of the sides may have little to play for in the league.

Those Bench Boosting in Double Gameweek 37 will be relying on many teams still being motivated and therefore less prone to rotation, yet there’s a chance that the fight for survival and battle for top-four finishes could be done and dusted by then.

Meanwhile, Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City, Man United and Spurs could all still be involved in cup competitions come Double Gameweek 37.

In the case of Man City and Arsenal, the Champions League and Europa League semi-final second legs are in the midweek before the start of Double Gameweek 37. Meanwhile, the Europa League final is just three days after Gameweek 38.

Chelsea, Spurs and Man United all still have hopes of clinching the FA Cup, with the final taking place on May 19 – six days after the end of the season.

You only have to look back to Double Gameweek 37, where Antonio Conte named the following XI at home to Watford in the second of Chelsea’s matches, with one eye on the FA Cup final on May 27.

Begovic; Zouma, Ake, Terry; Azpilicueta, Chalobah, Kante, Kenedy; Hazard, Willian; Batshuayi

While those who opt to Bench Boost in Double Gameweek 34 may have fewer big-hitting, explosive options to load up on, their squads could be less likely to suffer from unexpected teamsheets as fringe players get the chance of a run-out in the penultimate Gameweek.

With Harry Kane potentially still in the running along with the likes of Romelu Lukaku, Eden Hazard, Christian Eriksen and Riyad Mahrez, it’s not as if we’ll short of premium, in-form picks for Double Gameweek 34.

Arguably, then, Fantasy managers who are looking to lessen the likelihood of rotation – and avoid a repeat of instances such as Conte’s infamous XI – may look to using an early Wildcard in Gameweek 32 or 33 in order to profit from the security of Double Gameweek 34 instead.

Choosing when to play the Triple Captain chip will also impact in our plans.

Looking at the main contenders in Double Gameweek 34, Kane – if fit – hosts Man City, Mahrez and Hazard have Burnley away, while Lukaku, although in form, has been far from explosive and managed three double-digit returns all season.

On the other hand, Kane’s Double Gameweek 37, away to West Brom and at home to Newcastle, could prove the big factor in deciding when to play our Triple Captain chip and therefore also our Bench Boost.

Granted, we won’t forgot this season’s Double Gameweek 22 in a hurry – the Spurs striker returned just three points against Swansea and West Ham – yet Kane’s exploits in the corresponding round last term will live far longer in the memory.

Five goals and an assist over 180 minutes’ pitch-time against Man United and Leicester in Double Gameweek 37 preceded a hat-trick at Hull in the season finale to clinch the Golden Boot.

Even if he fails to overcome Mohamed Salah as the top scorer in 2017/18, a fully-fit Kane’s security of pitch-time makes him a big favourite for the Double Gameweek 37 Triple Captain chip.

Again, while Man City also have the fixtures – at home to Huddersfield and Brighton – if Pep Guardiola’s men wrap up the league title early and progress past Liverpool into the Champions League semi-finals, rotation looks inevitable.

Indeed, their head-to-head with the Merseysiders could ultimately prove decisive in how we approach the remaining rounds of fixtures.

Defeat to Liverpool would leave City with only league matches left on their agenda and that might not be a bad thing, even if the title is wrapped up by that point.

As discussed on club’s official website earlier in the week, Guardiola’s men have as many as ten Premier League records in their sights.

Incentive enough, surely, to limit the chances of rotation should they fall to defeat and fail to reach the last four in Europe.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

3,325 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Cantonas Demons
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    WC RMT for 2xDGW Please !

    Schmeichel (McCarthy)
    Davies, Jones, Christensen, (Simpson, Lowton)
    Salah (C), Son, Willian, Groß, (Stephens)
    Firmino, Lukaku, Vardy

    0.7 ITB

    Planning to transfer back in Kane with double Transfer. Will see when the time comes

    Thanks

  2. ViperStripes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    On WC:

    Leicester: Morgan (4.4) or Chilwell (4.3)
    or Burnley: Lowton (4.4) - would be a double up with Ward

    I have exact money for my WC squad so the extra 0.1 saved on Chilwell would be useful.

    1. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Think Morgan because Chilwell has been a bit in and out of the team.

      1. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        This ^^^^, worth being nailed in DGWs, otherwise what’s the point of picking someone who may perhaps play 1 or even just part of 1 game?

  3. Richd
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Vardy, Murray and ???

    Either Barnes or Wood.

    1. Jay_
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Gotta be Wood. I’m actually warming to a front line like that. Could spread so much money on nailed defs and Erik and Haz over Willian and Son. Then again, is going against the template of Will and Son even worth it? And paying 5m more to do so.

      1. Richd
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I’m thinking Sanchez and quality defenders but yeah. It could really pay off but it’s a punt!

        1. Jay_
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Yep. More Valencia, Azpi over Cedric, Morgan in my case. On the forwards, I’m no BUR expert but looking at the minutes played, it seemed Barnes’ run only started once Wood’s finished, due to injury I think.

  4. Pooodle
    • 17 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Any obvious improvements to this?

    0.9m ITB for Aubameyang to Lukaku in 34 - would only need 1 of the 2FTs I'll have for 34.

    DDG, Ryan
    Alonso, Smalling, Morgan, Lowton, Tarkowski
    Salah, Willian, Son, Mahrez, Westwood/other 4.3m
    Aubameyang, Firmino, Vardy

  5. Z3US
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Kante being overlooked as enabler midfielder? See everyone going for Gudmunsson - but Kante nailed, 0.2 cheaper, and if like me playing BB in GW34 he might get the odd assister/goal??

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Many are doubling up on Chelsea defense with Willian/Hazard

      1. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Alonso, Christensen, Willian

    2. bench boost for every gamew…
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      6 pointer, yes

  6. Cok3y5murf
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Which 2 (or 3) premium strikers are you planning to have in your team for GW37?

    1. Virgil Hilts
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Vardy & Kane (if recovered),

      Will keep Lukaku if Kane fitness doubt

    2. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Probably Kane and Vardy. Might still have Firmino chilling in there instead of Vardy (or as well as, not sure how I'm going to do it yet)

    3. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Lukaku and Vardy are now season keepers.

      Auba out for Kane if fit for 34, if not for cheap DGW34. Then Kane for 37.

  7. ooooo
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Changes?

    DDG
    Bailly Christ Robertson
    Salah Mahrez Son Willian
    Auba Lukaku Murray

    Fab Gudmunsson Lowton Chilwell

    0,1mil

  8. Drogba Legend
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Activated WC before scheduling was announced, and no FH left:

    DDG
    Smalling - Mustafi - Robertson
    Son - Salah - Willian - Mahrez - Gudmonsson
    Aub - Lukaku

    Ryan - Barnes - Lowton - Morgan

    .4 ITB

    This allows me to:

    GW32: Team above
    GW33: Save FT
    GW34: 11DGW players + 2 Arsenal + 2 Liverpool + BB Chip
    GW35: 2 FT plus maybe a hit for city assets and playing GW35 players
    GW36: Save FT
    GW37: Get in as many DGW players as possible plus TC chip

    Thoughts?

    1. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Sounds sensible

    2. George James
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Nice plan and decent team. In the exact same situation so good to see another persons view. Not sure I can afford that team though what’s your TV? only worry would be Robertson poss rotation with Moreno

      1. Drogba Legend
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        102.5..should be higher but messed up a few times over the past few weeks and once on my WC already :/

        Robertson should be nailed unless they do rotate with Moreno for CL. We're just in a tough spot with already activating our WC and no FH. This seems like one of the most logical solutions.

        1. Drogba Legend
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Even if Robertson gets rotated, the fixtures aren't too bad for our bench defenders.

    3. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Yeah I'm in same boat and have something similar.

    4. Drogba Legend
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Wish I had .2 more for Bailly, and probably looking to offload Aub for Vardy in 34 and roll my other FT over to 35 so I have 2FT for 35 and take a hit too on 35 as well

  9. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    The article above advocates BB in 34 because 37 will have:

    A) Unpredictable teamsheets because teams have nothing to play for.

    B) Involvement in cup competitions.

    Fair enough. But I would much rather tackle this with a 36 wildcard and a cherry picked team.

    That would be much better than tackling this with a 32 Wildcard that has one eye on 34.

    All the issues (A and B above) will be much harder to deal with if wildcarding way back in 32.

    1. Pras (FPL)
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      It’s also a bit of scaremongering tbh eg. TC Kane or nothing!

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Captaining Kane and having 15 handpicked double gameweek players will be far more powerful than TCing Kane and having a patched up team from a 32 Wildcard.

    2. Bunk Moreland
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Although you only need 11 nailed players in 37 if you have already used BB (or even 9 or 10 as your bench may step in), but you need 15 with a BB 37 as every player gone is a instant loss of points.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Fair point, but surely all the problems of 37 are easier to deal with if you're wildcarding in 36 (and not 32).

        1. Bunk Moreland
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Of course.

          1. Virgil Hilts
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            34 teamsheets will be easier to predict than 37 ones....

            1. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              But the WC in 32 is trying to predict 34 and 37 ?

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Precisely.

              2. Zladan
                • 8 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                Not predicting the full 15 players though.

            2. FPL Virgin
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Teamsheets are never easy to predict. In any gameweek.

              But even if 37 is the most difficult teamsheet of the entire season to predict .... how does a Wildcard in 32 make it any easier?

              1. Jairzinho
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 15 Years
                8 years, 4 months ago

                This is an excellent point.

                1. FPL Virgin
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 4 months ago

                  Yes you have to get 15 players out twice rather than 11 out twice, but that's what handpicking players in a Wildcard is all about.

                  You can see the lay of land (4 gameweeks on from GW32) and avoid who you need to avoid.

                  Whereas GW32 wildcarders will need to take hits to craft their 37 team taking into account all the problems of rotation, motivation etc

            3. Zladan
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              This

        2. Uppercut Panda - A legend i…
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Of course. I just think a lot of managers including myself backed themselves into a corner in 31 by loading up on uninspiring picks. For me, the problems I would have had to deal with from now until a 36 WC would have been greater than the problems I'll have to deal with in 36 from a 32 WC.

    3. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      The article comes over as justifying the WC32/33, BB34, FH35, TC 37 without also genuinely looking at the issues with it ... seems very defensive of the FFS preferred strategy that has been put in place by the ‘powers that be’ rather than a balanced review ... a bit disappointing really 🙁

      1. Pras (FPL)
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Can’t agree more

      2. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I think it has to look at the strategies mainly concerning players with all their chips really. Hence the analysis.

        Trying to go into the myriad of options if you have already played this chip or the other is almost impossible to summarise.

        1. Pras (FPL)
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I have all maybe chips (incl. WC) and I think the states strategy is suboptimal

          If anything the article is aimed at those who have all chips left BUT have already played their WC so have to stick to BB34, FH35, TC37

          1. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 19 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            But the article doesn't say this is now the right way, it just adopts the popular strategy with all chips intact as a starting point.

            Hands up, for me the Kane TC in 37 decides the BB in 34 for me and, if that's a given, then the WC has to come in 32 or 33.

            I'm very interested to look at alternatives to this, though.

            1. Pras (FPL)
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Even on Hot Topics - the one highlighted is the strategy that justifies the FH35, TC 37 strategy.

              There have been several discussions on here on alternative strategies a la FH34, TC 35, WC36, BB 37

        2. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          maybe, but it lacks the normal and basic ‘pros & cons’ that one would expect

      3. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I agree. Brilliant article as ever by Paul - incredible how quickly he got it out complete with that infamous Chelsea teamsheet from last season - but it is clearly trying to justify the howler of wildcarding before the fixtures were announced. Seems to be trying to spin the premature 32 Wildcard into being the preferred strategy when it is anything but.

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          Exactly, the emphasis on the rotation of Chelsea last season as a reason not to BB in 37, when the strategy of the WC32 is to get all the 2 x doublers who likewise will be exposed to rotation in 37 but you are stuck with them with just the odd transfer in hand ? Bizarre

          1. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 19 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Why is anyone stuck with players? We have FT's before GW37 - we can tailor using those so rotation risks can be minimised.

            Plus in GW37, there's no need to get more than an XI out if the BB is played in GW34.

            1. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              Because the entire argument for the WC in 32 is that you know who has a double in 34 & 37 so you load up with them. Not so much stuck with them but more like lumbered with them because ... The FH in 35 sends your GW34 team straight in to 36, that is 3 games (FA Cup & 2 PL) without a transfer. That leaves 2 transfers before 37 to sort out what ever you get back in 36 (my FH in 31 gave me Ayew and Kane with red flags) and no doubt you need those to get in Kane for your TC ... very little scope to deal with any thing else without major surgery - hence stuck/lumbered with your 32/33 choices 🙂 but of course you can take hits if you want 😉

        2. Mark
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 19 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I don't think playing the WC in 32 or 33 can be classed as a "howler".

          Playing the WC later - perhaps in GW36 as you suggest - offers 3 GW's with a rebuilt squad - one of which is GW38 which be a lottery, while GW37 could also be very difficult to predict.

          Timing and execution of a WC are two different arguments. I had all this with Jonty earlier in the season.

          Play the WC badly and it can flop regardless of when it's played - my first WC is evidence of that. But a good WC can only be more powerful if played earlier, with more GW's to reap the benefit.

          If you were 100% guaranteed to play your WC brilliantly, selecting all the right players, when you would like to play it - GW32 with 7 GW's left, or GW36 with three?

          For me, the DGW's are the trigger for the WC and I don't think going early will be an error timing wise. But that won't compensate for a bad WC. We all have to pick the right players, regardless.

          Having said all this, alternative approaches like the one you suggest are brilliant. They prompt debate like this but, better still, they will add variety to the end of the season.

          1. FPL Virgin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Thanks Mark.

            I get that the longer your Wildcard is in play, the more potential benefit you can get out of it.

            I'm coming at it from a different angle, though. I think cherry picking a team just before the first double and cherry picking yet another team just before the second double will be far more powerful.

      4. pundit of punts
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I would have been roasted if I said that.

        +1

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          You do seem to have your ... ahem ... groupies 😉

      5. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 19 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        We wanted to get some immediate reaction out a few hour after the announcement rather than take a day or so to absorb all the permutations.

        There's no doubt that there are more strategies open and you guys are already discussing some great approaches that may well prove more efficient.

        But we needed a starting point for the article and that starting point was to adopt the approach of a manager with all chips remaining - as you mention, this was a popular standpoint.

        And from that perspective, I think we've described the scenario ahead. As we say, many will now consider the BB in GW37, though much depends on whether you're backing Kane in GW37 over the options available in GW34. For me, I think that could be more powerful than the BB.

        Exploring all the angles, with a variety of chips permutations was going to be very difficult in a single article and I don't think just a couple of hours after absorbing the fixtures we would have hit all the possible angles anyway.

        Let's keep seeing what comes out over the next day or two and discuss again via other mediums like the ScoutCast.

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          As Virg says, a great speedy reaction ... and it has certainly generated debate which is the whole point of coming on here 🙂

          1. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 19 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Yeah, I think analysis will go on for days and other sites and streams and podcasts will have have their analysis. But we didn't want to sit back and produce something in a few days - lets get some thoughts out there and take it from there.

            This is all good. I'm hoping there's some different views on Tuesday's cast too.

    4. Pras (FPL)
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      BB in 34 gets you Lowton, Barnes, Morgan and Ryan twice. Not sure what’s so appealing there anyway.

      FH34 means all big hitters like Haz, Eriksen, Kane?, Luka, Ddg, Alonso can be afforded because you have a 3.9 bench fodder

    5. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      It would be much easier to have a wildcard before every one of the double gameweeks.

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        The FH is effectively a WC

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I've been arguing for this in my article. The FH needs to be treated as a third Wildcard.

          1. Pooodle
            • 17 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            I was being sarcastic to try to stop the constant shouting at everyone who has wildcarded in 32 as if it's the biggest mistake anyone could ever have made.

            It just depends on your individual team. Simple as.

            1. WE ARE RANGERS
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              You could easily WC after GW36 but end up with a few non players because of unpredictable line ups = waste of WC IMO

            2. Balotellitubbies
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 4 months ago

              This. If you got loads of GW31 deadwood in your team, WC now is probably the best strategy. If your team is ok-ish set up for 34, then WC36 is probably the best.

    6. minges
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Everyones strategy depends on their own set of circumstances (chips left, team set up) so its really up to individuals to think for themselves, as you are free to do so.

      But from your points, just because you chose to WC in 36 for a 37BB, doesn't make point A and B that you make any less relevant. 'Cherry picking' your 37 team in 36 doesn't make them any less prone to rotation or rest

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        What I'm saying is that it is much, much harder to deal with issues A and B with a wildcard way back in 32. It makes issues A and B far more problematic and difficult to react to with any kind of freedom with your team.

        1. minges
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          yep, and as those issues around end of season will still be there regardless of WC 32 or 36, best to make max points now while teams are a bit more settled. In my opinion. Doesn't mean your strategy wont pay off, but its not for me

      2. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Cherry picking them in 36 or 37 makes it a lot easier to navigate the rotation than committing to them in 32?

        All strategies have pros and cons, but this article seems a bit one sided in pointing them out

        Any way, good luck to all and one 😉

        1. WE ARE RANGERS
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          How can you navigate the rotation? Line ups will be very unpredictable

          1. Hotdogs for Tea
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 4 months ago

            Ok

    7. Gizzachance
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      so many good points on the w/c scenario,only thing puts me off the dgw 37 it means players are playing 3 games in a week. gw 37 weekend and midweek,plus the following weekend in gw38 ,only one transfer to go into the final game
      .think its gonna be more difficult to have players that will get you through gw 37 and 38 without a lot of rotation.
      of course it depends if teams still have anything to play for
      will be very interesting to see how it all works out,good luck all which ever path you take !

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        You should have a decent bench in 38 if you boosted in 37, so hopefully the surprise team lineups in 38 will be covered by the bench ?

  10. Don Kloppeone
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Bottomed

    How does this look - on a WC:

    £0.2itb
    DDG (Ryan)
    Alonso, Bailly, Morgan, Lowton (Christensen)
    Salah, Mahrez, Willian, Son (Gros)
    Auba, Firmino (Murray)

    Will probably do: Firmino, Auba >> Lukaku, Vardy for GW34

    What do you reckon? I have my FH and BB left

  11. Jay_
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Now the fixtures are out the next headache is Kane’s return date. I’m thinking Auba as a place holder with some budget defenders and a generally weaker squad (for BB 34) or a Vardy/Wood type with the funds spread and a better all round squad for BB 34. Problem is, with Auba and the weaker squad or Vardy/Wood and the stronger squad, is if it’s still uncertain of Kane’s return date by deadline, you’d have to commit, one way or another. With the stronger squad and funds spread it will be agg getting Kane in, even with 2 FT’s. With Aub and the weaker squad you won’t have enough transfers to keep swap for Vardy/Wood and spead the cash ideally in 34.

    1. Bunk Moreland
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Kane will need some time to get going, I'm not captaining him in 34 regardless.

      1. Jay_
        8 years, 4 months ago

        If he was back for 34, getting him in 34, even without Captaining him would mean that once your FH 35 team bounces back in 36, you’d aleady have him. Giving you the freedom of 2 FT’s to get some Arsenal, City or any other luxury moves.

    2. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I reckon you can ignore Kane until 36. His double in 34 isn't great and there's a good chance he won't be fit to start both.

      1. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Agreed, will be leaving until 37, if at all

      2. Jay_
        8 years, 4 months ago

        True but as I commented above to someone else, if FH in 35, without having him in 34 will leave all your future FT’s on getting back in 36 or 37. Same goes for a Spurs Def too.

        1. Pooodle
          • 17 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I'm happy with that, would end up having to take a hit but I'd rather do that an have a fully firing Lukaku in 34 and Kane in 37 then a half fit Kane in 34. Still scarred after his last no show in the double...

  12. Shake n Bake
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    given the double GW announcement is it worth rolling the dice on Lingard given Man U has a nice double?

    1. AThousandSuns
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      NO because of game time only if he becomes nailed

    2. Virgil Hilts
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Only roll the dice on those considered nailed for both games In DGWs.

      Lingard is not this.

  13. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    How is this for WC squad? No FH. Will get Lukaku in for Firmino and Gudmundsson for Silva pre 34 giving 11 double week players and will aim for 9/10 in week 35. It’s hard with no FH!

    De Gea (Ryan)
    Bailly Mustafi Robertson (Morgan Lowton)
    Salah Willian Son Mahrez DSilva
    Aubameyang Firmino (Wood)

  14. Clintymints
    • 17 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Is there an agreement that Bailly will be more nailed on than any other united defender (except Valencia)

    It's a case of

    DdG Ryan
    Alonso Bailly Robertson Lowton vdH

    vs
    DdG Ryan
    Alonso Smalling Robertson Lowton Tarkowski

    BB 34 of course... Losing out on Burnley double up with Bailly over Smalling. Is he worth the extra?

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Burnley double defense with those fixtures in 34?

      1. Clintymints
        • 17 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        They could be, you'd never totally write them off against one. My problem is finding out exactly how nailed on Smalling is, that's the issue

        It's easy to get Kane back in for 34 if I swap Alonso to Christensen and Auba to Kane IF I get Smalling, but I need the fella to play that double!

    2. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Why is everyone so confident on Bailly when he's played just the last game

      1. Clintymints
        • 17 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        I'm not, that's the prob. You'd sure as hell want someone nailed for 6 mil that's for sure

      2. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Best CB, should be fresh after a time out

        1. Jairzinho
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          He’s recovering from injury though; not fresh from a holiday.

  15. Andy1
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    How does this WC team look?

    Lloris Ryan
    Valencia Christensen ota lowton chilwell
    Sterling Salah son mahrez willian
    Lukaku Murray barnes

  16. FPL_Hazards
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    When was Mahrez flagged?

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      He met up with the Algeria team with some knocks and niggles. But since then he's been training with the team as normal.

    2. MTPockets
      8 years, 4 months ago

      He's not flagged, but: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976400580104065024

  17. ViperStripes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    So my WC team as it stands.....reasonably similar to the emerging template.

    DDG / Ryan
    Stephens, Lowton, Ward, Chilwell, Smalling
    Gross, Mahrez, Son, Willian, Salah
    Auba, Vardy, Murray
    3.8m itb

    GW33 Save FT
    GW34 Auba > Lukaku and 1FT to sort any other issue.

    1. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I think that's far too much money in the bank. You could easily upgrade a couple of your defenders and still have money for Auba to Lukaku.

      1. Drogba Legend
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        ^

      2. ViperStripes
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        It allows enough money for Auba & Vardy > Kane & Lukaku or to bring in Alonso or Hazard on the GW34 FT

        1. Pooodle
          • 17 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          I reckon just get Alonso in now. You've got to back yourself that you'll get more points using up all of your budget than leaving so much in the bank, especially with a Southampton defender and double Brighton attack.

  18. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    For those people with all their chips and unsure about what to do:

    Start bringing in GW35 blank players now with FTs.

    FH 34 to load up on players with doubles.

    Get your team filled with single gameweek players back for 35. Triple captain punt.

    Wildcard 36.

    BB 37.

    1. Jay_
      8 years, 4 months ago

      That’s actually a good shout

    2. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      BB still better for 34.

    3. MTPockets
      8 years, 4 months ago

      TC on a sgw isn't optimal.

    4. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      What's the rationale behind TC in a SGW over a DGW. Surely the odds favour the DGW choice?

    5. Pras (FPL)
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Yup.. +1

    6. Virgil Hilts
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Rotation in 37 could leave plenty of SGW players that should have been DGWers....

    7. 1Banksy
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      So punty but could pay off massively. You would make signigicant gains on most of the top managers as they will playing it safe with the BB/FH/TC route. Especially big in 35 TC vs FH.

  19. stat
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Anyone holding on to Stanislas for the next 3 GWs?

    GW 32 - wat
    GW 33 - CPA
    DGW 34 - liv + MUN

    1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      34 is brutal though

  20. grayedog
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    On a WC right now, looking for a full DGW34 team for BB that week, with 0.1 ITB:

    DDG / McCarthy
    Alonso, Christensen, Morgan, Lowton, VDH
    Mahez, Son, Salah, Willian, Andy King
    Lukaku, Barnes, Vardy

    With SWA not on DGW now, looking to replace VDH (4.4) and Andy King (4.2) with players who should play. Open to other movement too if needed. Thoughts?

    1. grayedog
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Options to swap out VDH + Andy King:

      a) Simon Francis + Lewis Cook (both BOU)
      b) Bong (BHA) + Lewis Cook (BOU)
      c) Schelotto (BHA) + Lewis Cook (BOU)
      d) one of the above with Oriol Romeu or Hojbjerg in place of Lewis Cook
      e) swap Alonso for Azpi or Ben Davies and have 0.3 more to make a swap

  21. Zladan
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Going cheap at the back:

    DDG Ryan
    Lowton Tark Chilwell Schelotto Smalling
    Mahrez Son Willian Cork Salah
    Vardy Auba Lukaku

    Kane 34 plan: Auba -> Kane and Son -> Groß or Willian -> Knockaert/Propper

    No Kane 34 plan: Auba, Willian, Cork -> Barnes, Hazard, Groß

    Thoughts?

  22. stat
    8 years, 4 months ago

    A) Gross - LEI, HUD, cpa+TOT
    B) Stanislas - wat, CPA, liv+MUN

    1. Lemongrab
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Gross. That BOU double is horrible and Gross has 2 good home games first.

      1. stat
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Cheers

  23. Lemongrab
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    How's this look

    DDG - Ryan
    Tark - Christiansen - Smalling - Chillwell - Lowton
    Mahrez - Salah - Son - Willian - Gross
    Vardy - Firm - Auba

    Will do Auba to Kaku for the DGW

    BB34 FH35 TC37

    0.2ITB

    Any advice appreciated!

    1. Colonel Shoe 肝池
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      benching headaches aplenty before 34

    2. Annie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      With 0.2 what are the other moves to get Lukaku?

  24. The Mighty Hippo
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Would two Chelsea defenders (Alonso and Christensen) be too much for a wc team?

    1. Lemongrab
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Not if you can afford it.

    2. TorresMagic™
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Would you play both vs Spurs?

      1. Lemongrab
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Depends who's on the bench, I would never drop Alonso

      2. The Mighty Hippo
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        No, I'd also have Bailly and Morgan, so I'd probably only play Alonso alongside them.

        I could always transfer Christensen in, but I have doing a WC with a transfer planned in, it almost never works.

      3. Virgil Hilts
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Play Alonso and a Burnley def at WBA with Christensen on bench

  25. Colonel Shoe 肝池
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    really only wanted 3 pool as my sgw limit tops................now i have 1 city and 2 arse into the mix 🙁

    i have to get rid dont i, if i want to bb..............but who

    roberston, salah, firm, auby, monreal, dilva

    1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Probs the defenders

  26. pundit of punts
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Are many here overhyping rotation in GW 37?

    Swansea, Newcastle, West Ham and Southampton will be in a relegation fight.

    No one will get Huddersfield and Brighton due to bad fixtures.

    Chelsea, Spurs and United Will be in the top 4 race.

    Mahrez will be playing for a move.

    1. MTPockets
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Gets exaggerated every season, but still a risk.

    2. Richd
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Oh it’s this guy again

      1. pundit of punts
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        You seem obsessed with me. 🙄

        Ignore me if you don't like me.

    3. Chris_H
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      I think for those of us without a FH there is some logic to TC in 34 and BB in 37, like you say there is the possibility of enough teams with something to play for to get a nailed on squad...

      1. pundit of punts
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        Absolutely.

    4. Virgil Hilts
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      It’s more about tiredness at the end of the season with 2 games in a week, plus inevitably one or two teams will have nothing to play for

  27. BellyKlopp
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    thoughts on WC team?

    DDG Ryan

    Smalling Mustafi Chrisensen Lowton Chilwell
    Salah Son Willian Gudmundsson L Cook
    Lukaku Vardy Firmino

    1.5itb

    1. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      6/10

  28. Delph & Safety
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Not much point on playing the market when there isn’t any price changes.
    Might as well just make the transfers and play about that way?

    1. Richd
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Well.

      Don’t get rid of people you hold value on.

      Hold people who may rise.

      Temporarily drop people who may drop.

      So keep a slight eye on it

    2. Virgil Hilts
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Forget double risers and profit making.

      Just make sure you don’t miss 0.1 risers or fallers that mess your plans up....

  29. Ronnies
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    On WC...

    Whos get the last defender spot, 4.6m so spend.

    Currently on ... alonso - bailly - morgan - lowton __ ?

    Tnks guys.

    1. Gazza2000
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Tarkowski

      1. Ronnies
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 4 months ago

        would mean a double up in defence on burnley !
        I was thinking duffy or dunk

        1. Drogba Legend
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 4 months ago

          But Burnley plays in 35 again so you wouldn't have to burn a transfer unless you FH35

    2. Kevin Twine
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Duffy

  30. jbenny1107
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 4 months ago

    Christensen or Davies?

    1. Pooodle
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 4 months ago

      Christensen because Davies won't play both matches in a double