Members
7 September 2018 800 comments
DavidMunday815 DavidMunday815
Share:

Romelu Lukaku has the potential to complicate the plans of Fantasy Premier League managers in the coming weeks.

That’s because the Manchester United forward appears to be back to his best ahead of a run of favourable fixtures.

The Belgian’s underlying numbers have yielded three goals in as many matches so far in 2018/19, and five bonus points to boot.

When he was in form at the start of last season his ownership peaked at 60.2 percent in October, with his price at the time £0.8m higher than it is now.

So we’ve had a look at whether he’s worth including in our Fantasy squads again, especially considering he is backed by just 7.5 percent ahead of Gameweek 5.

Fantasy Football Scout members can read ahead, and also pour over Lukaku’s data in the Members Area.

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

800 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Arsenal assets
    Geoff
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Fantasy Football Scout Daily Hot Topic

    What are you looking at doing with Arsenal assets, and why?

    With quite a few options to choose from across the side, Emery has already surprised us by resting a few players. Who are you looking at bringing in and who are you looking at selling?

    If you are on a wildcard, or if you were on a wildcard, what would your Arsenal plan be?

    Are any of the defence real options? Who is your top pick and why? Is Cech too much of a worry to go with? Midfield looks full of options - are you looking at Mkhi or Ramsey?

    And what about up front? Have you seen enough from Lacazette or Aubameyang to bring them into your squad?

    1. Costa Nostra
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Have a look at last games heat map of Laca and Auba side by side....if you still want Auba then you’re reading it wrong. Lol!

      1. Costa Nostra
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        And average position by Gameweek while you’re at it....it’s quite telling of what happens when they both play together.

        1. Desperately Seeking Dusan
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          it didn't stop Auba scoring.

      2. Petrichor II
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Laca is good and impressive but stiil have to wait what Emery does. Starting or be benched

        1. Costa Nostra
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Lacazette has one less attempt than Auba and has played half the minutes. Emery needs a kick in the arse if he keeps benching Lacazette.

          1. Geoff
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 13 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            I think Laczaette is on the verge of a run of starts his stats do look really nice

            1. Costa Nostra
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              I agree. If I was binging in anyone, it would be him, especially if he starts again next week. He’s in my plans for sure if I see him playing regularly. So much better value than Auba.

          2. Desperately Seeking Dusan
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            I agree with this but I wonder if there are some politics involved across the team. Lacazette plays well when he comes on yet doesn't seem to start. It also seems like there is pressure to play Ozil and Cech and neither makes sense. Emery says he wants a pressing game and clearly Ozil is not the player for that (although Mkhi isn't either arguably although he did play in a Dortmund team that did this). Ditto Cech. Arsenal spent 20 million on a keeper which I know isn't Allison or Kepa money but it still something like the eighth highest amount spent on a keeper and he's apparently good with his feet. Emery says he wants a ball playing keeper but persists with Cech who looks like a fish out of water. It's not his game. So why play him unless there is some kind of pressure from elsewhere to play Cech?

    2. Petrichor II
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      The reason I have Lukaku is he good enough to be Auba alongside Aguero if needed.

      Auba is the most nailed attacking player.

    3. pundit of punts
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      On WC. Going with no Arsenal.

      The defense is shipping goals for fun. Cech is shaky and they probably won't look good till Koscielny returns.

      Ozil is far too inconsistent. Ramsey/mkhi?iwobi are rotation risks with EL coming soon.

      Auba too expensive for a LW player and chances of early sub. Prefer a niled on Lukaku who's in form at that price.

      Only interesting option is Lacazette at his price but need to see more of him before I commit. And, again the EL may mean rotation between him and Auba.

      Steering well clear atm.

    4. Greenbackbøøg…
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Laca really underrated option imo, decent price and he simply scores whenever he gets the chance to play. Has looked lively as well this season and sharper than auba imo

    5. Smurf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Emery hasn’t rested players, he just doesn’t know his best eleven yet.

      I’m on wildcard and previously had Auba but I’ve dumped him. It wasn’t easy as he is a player I really like, he’s finally got a goal and has great fixtures. But there are just too many better alternatives at his price at this point in time.

      To me the defence is a no go. The only reason I’d consider an Arsenal asset would be their attack because they are going to have to score plenty of goals to make up for their poor defence.

      1. Badluck Jonathan
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Agree with all this

    6. jia you
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Have Auba and will likely keep him for the next few fixtures at least!
      Not interested in their defence or midfielder in the slightest atm!

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        ...in saying that I do have GZ on my bench!

    7. Badluck Jonathan
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Holding Mkhitaryan for at least 1 more week. Beating Cardiff 3-2 with a late goal is hardly an unequivocal success. Still remains to be seen what Emery will settle on.

      If I was on WC I would avoid completely

    8. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Something wrong with that team. I can't put my finger on it and just can't be Arsed with 'em.

    9. TheTwelfthMan
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Getting rid of Mkhitaryan. Tempted to do Firmino to Lacazette.

    10. Aftermath
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Had auba since the beginning but shipped him for Lacazette this week, link up play between the both of them looked very good. Aubamayeng hasn't been getting into the positions you'd want a 11m forward to get into tbh.

      Defense is pretty much a no go and as long as torreira is benched for xhaka, you can't expect much from the team either from what I've seen.

    11. Mikeharbrw
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Form is too squiffy for me at the moment. Steering clear.

    12. Shatner's Bassoon
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Lacazette is the front-runner for me in GW6 if he starts and performs at Newcastle. Emery can't leave someone out if they're performing - simple as that. Needs to keep getting results on the board.

      A good price for a forward in an attacking team with those strong fixtures, and is an easy move to Vardy if it doesn't work out, so for team structure he's ideal as well.

      Ozil & Auba are too expensive at the moment in my book. Ramsey is worth considering but Moura, Maddison and Richarlison from GW6 look like they could be better options in that price bracket.

      Not considering defence or GKs at all. Way better options out there.

    13. Rotation's Alter Ego
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Nothing really jumping out at me just yet, but a bunch of them have potential to be good.

      Laca could be an explosive punt if he gets some good minutes, but there's a lot of uncertainty around him. Auba was someone I thought would have a golden season, but has struggled to hit top form. Until he shows signs on hauling, I'll go Kun over him easily.
      Midfield looks both uncertain and mediocre. Mkhi and Ramsey look good value if they keep playing and scoring good returns. Guendouzi is intriguing at 4.5, but has a lot of competition and is still young, plus hasn't looked threatening.
      Defence was tempting, but I won't pay premium for a defender if they can't keep a clean sheet. Monreal and Bellerin both nicely attacking though, so they could be tempting in the future - if they tighten up.

    14. MANGE TOUT RODNEY
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I've got Monreal and am holding but not convinced. Goal was nice though!

    15. korbendallas82
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      i got mkhtaryan as replacement for Richarlison. i will sell Mkhtaryan for him again, i think.

    16. Forget Special, I am the ON…
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      On a WC and definitely not holding any Arsenal player.
      at the start I had Ozil later switched to Mkhi and now want to monitor them first before signing anyone else.

      I like Ramsey if he can make no.10 role his own, rest Auba is too expensive to be playing on Wing and Laca can come good but seems like Emery has a bigger problem to accommodate everyone.

      Better wait & watch with Arsenal.

    17. Kolarov Fpl Legend
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I'm on a WC and i brought Lacazette. There are many reasons imo to bring him in.
      Since they leak goals for fun, they have to attack full 90'.
      They played their first full game together and I think they'll continue that way.
      If you are waiting to see his minutes, i think you are gonna miss all the points in this 2 games, then everyone will have him after Everton game. The time to own him is now imo.

      1. Goalosaurus
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        He can be a good pick for more than 2 gameweeks especially in that price bracket, not many other options.

    18. Goalosaurus
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Have Mkhi and Auba from the start and going to keep. Both on shaky ground though and probably wouldn't have any arsenal if on a wildcard. Agree with general view that Laca could be worth a shot.

    19. Roy Rovers
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Only 1 I would consider is Laca but currently have 3 performing up front..

    20. Eden Wizard
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Holding Mkhi - Too cheap to ditch and, i imagine he'll come back in for that donkey Ozil.

    21. Toblerone52 - Zlatan Ibra-H…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Got mhkitaryan at the moment. He's obviously a rotation threat so probably looking to get rid. Ramsey may tempt me as he looks a more secure starter. Or alternatively may downgrade to Fraser to get funds for Alonso.

      Lacazette looks a good option but I've no way of fitting him in without major surgery.

      Defence a no go area. They may get a few goals but clean sheets will be few and far between.

    22. Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Currently only have Auba, and 50/50 on whether to keep him or not.

    23. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Personally, Im avoiding until his starting 11 becomes clear (as I dont think Auba is worth 11m atm). Mkhi if he nails a spot, Ramsey if he starts showing more threat.

    24. Dickie1898
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Brought Laca in this week on a WC. Has form and fixtures, and after his performance against Cardiff surely he'll get his start. Don't see him being as much of a risk as many seem to be making out here.

      I want to get players in before they start hauling, and Laca fits the bill for me right now.

    25. Pinky Blinders
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I have Mhki, and had been enjoying watching his link up play with Bellerin develop. I think he will be back in next match since he seems like their best option on the right. If not, I will need to rethink options. Could go up to Dilva but not sure if it is worth the extra cash. GW5 will definitely be one where I am watching both Arsenal and MC closely.

    26. Dybala10
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Mhki owner and slightly worried after his past two games. Easy switch to Richarlison if he blanks again.

      Leno I’m keeping an eye on a 4.8 but no real desire for any other assets.

    27. Badgevilla
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Arsenal are terrible and even more so this season.

      I wouldn't touch them I'd rather spend the money elsewhere.

      I'd possibly get Ramsay or Laca at a push but I'd want to see some consistency first.

      I can't see Emery lasting long!!

    28. Bunk Moreland
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Sold Bellerin and Mkhi this week, for a -4. Haven¨t regretted it a second, my only regret is bringing them in in the first place. The team is not playing well defensively and offensively there is no nailed player who provides good value.

    29. HNI
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Just avoid. They were a decent side in past now they are everton level team with non nailed mids and overpriced nailed striker. Its not like you missing out on anything without Arsenal. 2-3 city/liv/chel covers, one each of spurs,utd and rest budget options. More than enough to score high with less worry

    30. Collie01
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Currently punting on Monreal on my WC.
      - Proven FPL track record
      - Attacking threat: assists and goals.
      - Good fixtures
      - Differential
      - No champions league to contend with.
      - Arsenal have had 13 clean sheets each of the last 2 seasons, which isn't a bad return. They are playing a new system and had 2 very tough opening fixtures. I think their CS potential is slightly better than most people seem to think.

      1. George Sillett
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        All the best with that madcap scheme.

        1. Collie01
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I'd hardly call it a madcap scheme.

    31. Tinzelbat
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I am not on a wildcard but already have auba and mhki looking to bring in leno also next week if he starts this week which I think he will.

      1. Silecro
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Arsenal def is best to avoid, cardiff are on paper team with lowest chance to score against them and they conceded 2, cant expect cs against pretty much anyone else

    32. Howiedo
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I agree that their defence has looked out of sorts so far. Still, I'm interested in Bellerin for that price (5,4) with such a nice program. I have a feeling that they historically have delivered CS very frequently against weaker sides, and especially at home. Last season they kept a CS at home to: WBA, Burnley, Bournemouth, Spurs, Huddersfield, Newcastle, Watford, Stoke. Away they kept CS vs: Burnley, Huddersfield, West Ham and Chelsea. In such a poor season, I think that's encouraging, especially given Bellerin's attacking potential, and I will be monitoring him/them away to Newcastle.

  2. Premium midfielder analysis
    Rossi3254
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Was just thinking about how many of the premium mids (8M plus) are actually worth getting right now with upcoming fixtures in mind so here is my analysis on them starting off with a look at all the city options with the help of some stats regarding how city have performed in the league games when KdB hasnt been in the squad since he joined. Small sample size admittidly but still worthy of note I think.

    Man City in PL since start of 15/16:
    Win Percentage: 65%
    Average GS per game: 2.27
    Average GC per game: 0.93

    Without KdB in squad
    Matches: 12
    Win Percentage:33%
    Average GS per game: 1.5
    Average GC per game: 1.5

    Admittidly they were fine against Huddersfield without him but in the subsequent two games they have not been at their best in fixtures where many were expecting them to pick up comfortable victories. Equally I think it is important that KDB is the one midfield player that Pep never rotated in the league last season and shows how important he is to their system and no other player can fill his role with the same output. This said I think all of the City midfield options should be avoided at the current time as without KDB I dont expect them to run riot in games in the same frequent way they did last season. It could be argued that his absence decreases the risk of rotation but I dont think this is the case as the addition of Mahrez plus the emergence of Bilva as a more regular option means that there are 6 Midfielders: Sterling, Sane, Mahrez, Bilva, Dilva and Gundogan competing for 4 places in the team. This could become 3 places is Jesus plays in a wide role or 2 if Pep plays 3 atb with Mendy and Walker as wing backs and Aguero and Jesus upfront assuming that Fernandinho's place in the team is not threatened. Now a quick run through of the other options.

    Salah: His baseline attacking numbers already appear to be extremely similar to last season besides a slight improvement in his chance creation numbers. However I made the decision at the start of the season to go without as I felt I could do better spreading the money around my squad and his performances havent worried me so far and he still misses big chances as against Leicester. Appreciate at some point in the season he will put in a big haul and will probably end the season with 250 plus points but I still stick by the decision to go without. Equally if you do own Salah you would be happy right now as so far he has provided consistent returns in 3 out of 4 matches and there is no reason to suddenly drop him now after one blank and due to tough fixtures coming up. Due to his high value if you have gone with him you cannot drop him when his baseline numbers are showing no signs of declining and he is a player who has a great chance of returns against any opposition. Also I think to get Salah in and out of teams will always require multiple transfers maybe 4 or 5 as the budget freed up in downgrading him needs to be spread around in building a balanced squad so this needs to be considered by managers transferring out Salah and making only one upgrade to their teams and then saving the wildcard to get him back at a later date.

    Hazard: In my opinion the best premium midfield option at the moment especially if you are a manager going without Salah. Looks to be thriving under Sarri given the freedom to roam in attack and dictate play around the box while still making runs in and getting chances. He is on penalties which cannot be said for many other premium midfield options and is averaging more touches in the box, shots, and big chances created per game than last season. Sarri himself keeps saying that he only expects his team to continue to improve as they adapt to his system, a frightening prospect considering how well they have done so far. Also the potential for him to play as the central attacking focal point of the side as Mertens did under sarri at Napoli if Morata continues to fail to find the net. Great fixtures coming up as well.

    Sanchez: Not much needs to be said here really Man United havent been inspiring at the start of the season and despite good fixtures he is a huge gamble even if he will be starting most games. Much better options out there

    Mane: Certainly the form player on this list and has to be considered especially by managers going without Salah. However he got off to an extremely fast start last season also before tailing off in subsequent gameweeks and a look at his baseline numbers for this season show that he is outperforming his expected goals and the form probably isnt maintainable. Add to this the Liverpools tough upcoming fixtures and Klopp's comments on rotation, I would say now could be a good time to get rid of Mane which could mean the extremely risky option of no Liverpool attacking cover for non Salah owners.

    Eriksen: Always a consistent performer and by the end of the season you can guarantee that he will almost certainly be up there among top scoring midfielders. However his loss of set pieces to Trippier is a huge blow to his assist potential and at the current time other Spurs midfielders are most definately better options.

    Alli: Coming to another one of the Spurs midfielders and I think Alli is a very good option. He is averaging more touches and nearly double the amount of shots in the area as last season so far and has been perhaps unlucky to not have more FPL returns after 4 games. With the return of Son from the Asian Games, Alli's starting place is certainly more secure than that of Lucas Moura and if you dont have the funds to afford Harry Kane upfront Alli could be a good Spurs alternative especially with the fixtures they have in the gameweeks after the Liverpool game

    Ozil: Not secured of a start, too inconsistent when he does play, avoid

    Son: Has the potential to emerge as a great option however not just yet as it is difficult to know how quickly he will be able to nail down a spot in the starting XI and could rotate a lot with Moura

    Pogba: Same as with Sanchez, United have not been convincing and while Pogba is a significantly cheaper option he does play in a deeper role. Also may not maintain his role as penalty taker following his miss against Burnley so I would avoid for now.

    To conclude if you own Salah then him and Hazard are the best two options but if going without Salah and you are bold enough to also not go with Mane then there are not many other great premium midfield options out there at the moment and with a wealth of performing mid priced and budget midfielders with good form and great fixtures such as Maddison, Fraser, Pereyra, Seri and Richarlison when he returns plus others that can emerge, perhaps a midfield of Hazard with a selection of these players that would give you massive spending power elsewhere in your team could be the way to go...
    What do people think of this?

    1. Differential C (Mark)
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Agree with a lot of your points. Hazard is the most essential premium mid at the moment, every WC team should have him in.
      Alli and Son, its a bit uncertain how this will turn out. The fact that Moura is on a roll suggests that Son will not be a definit shoe in to the XI. One to monitor.

      1. Rossi3254
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Yh I agree but perhaps one more performance from Moura and Son could be straight back in, imo he was one of spurs most important players last season

      2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        'Re Hazard

        Why is he essential? If Mane is overachieving then Hazard certainly is

      3. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        A last minute goal and a penalty that shouldn't have been and he's essential. Wow. His stats are not even that great. Mane a much better option

        1. Deulofail
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Talisman theory. Mane is a cog in the system and will get goals when they fall in front of him. Hazard makes goals happen and I'd guess will have a higher goal involvement than Mane now that Chelsea are getting up to speed and should start scoring freely. Besides, he looks good and likely to influence Chelsea's attack when using your eyes to view stats in real-time. At least, this is a legitimate angle to take. I wouldn't be so judgemental of it 😉

          1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
            • 16 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            4 or 5 seasons of hazard trolling me does that. I just think Mane is more dangerous myself

          2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
            • 16 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            And that's with the eye test as I very rarely use stats. Like to watch the players. Hazard usually has 3 players round him and doesn't shoot a lot

    2. jtreble
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      IMHO, Sterling is the great unknown here.

    3. SADIO SANÉ
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      not sure why there's a need for 'massive spending power elsewhere in your team' when the premium strikers are barely outscoring cheaper alternatives, if at all, and players like Mitro, Arnie, Deeney, Wilson could easily carry on that scoring.

      on Salah Mane Hazard Pedro* (*Richarlison soon probably) at the moment - the only way I downgrade any of them is if TWO premium strikers start firing and the cheaper strikers become too unpredictable.

      1. SADIO SANÉ
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        good post though - could look even better if Kane/Laca/Vardy/Lukaku start bracing

      2. Rossi3254
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I agree with your point, however players often get off to good starts such as Mounie, Vokes and Wood last season and Defoe and Stuani the season before who all scored 2 plus goals in the opening 4 games. However the premium strikers will always come good across the course of a season and we will likely end up wanting at least two of Kane, Aguero, Lukaku, Auba and Firmino in our teams, so for people on a wildcard it may be best to make the move to two of these options now as well as having some premium defenders considering how well they are performing and to do this less must be spent in midfield. Out of the players mentioned I would have Mitro as my third striker for sure

        1. SADIO SANÉ
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          obviously it depends on team form, but Fulham and Bournemouth look to be decent attacking teams, Watford are much improved under the new manager and Arnautovic is a very good player that most team goals will go through (although West Ham aren't looking good so far) - I think all 4 are capable of consistent returns and actually have brace-potential. I don't think Mounie (Hudd are turd), Vokes/Wood (Burnley rotation) are in any way similar to those 4 players, but we'll see.

      3. Ajith James
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        You can consider a big 4 or big 5 defense. It's never been done before on a large scale, bcos of the lack of multiple high-scoring defenders and budget attackers doing well at the same time. Might be the dawn of a new phase in FPL.

        1. Euro Raiders
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          See no one has agreed with you yet! I do. And reformatting to 1-5-4-1 with wildcard right now.

          1. joeydelucchi
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            im with you....im considering a 4-4-2 actually now too....just unsure if holebas will outscore a 5th mid?

            would be:
            hen (hamer)
            r-a-m holebas (wb)
            haz sal mane Moura (hojberg)
            arnie mitro (ings)

            1. Euro Raiders
              • 7 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              Got in defence: Holebas, Mendy, Alonso and going to add from.... Robertson, Luiz, Trippier and Shaw.

              Mids same as you except Walcott/Richarlison in lieu.

              Upfront is Firmino, Ings and Joselu... Ings 1st sub

              1. WesMantooth
                • 14 Years
                7 years, 3 months ago

                The problem with your idea is that your happy to spend 2+ million more on your bench than the people opting for a threeman-defence. I'm not sure thats the way to go. If you wanna play 5 at the back, you dont need Ings as a first sub. You'd actually be better of swapping him for Succes, and having him as third sub.

                The opportunity cost of playing 5 at the back is greater than ever now that we have serious 4.0 options in defence. I'd consider the pro's and con's carefully.

                1. Amsterhammer
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 10 Years
                  7 years, 3 months ago

                  You could easily argue the oppurtunity cost is less though. Because in the 5 man defence you have 5 players on the pitch that have a higher PPG average than the forwards and midfielders you would otherwise have. Plus you have a bench with a higher PPG for when the enevitable rotation kicks in for your City or Liv premium assets and CL fixtures. I would argue the oppurtunity cost across a season could easily be lower with 5 at the back playing.

                  1. WesMantooth
                    • 14 Years
                    7 years, 3 months ago

                    Anyone can argue anything.

                    You're correct in thense that thus far a lot of defenders have had higher PPG's than mids and attackers. This wont be the case come end of season though. A really good season by a defender would be approximately 5ppg, or 190pts, (lescott-196 is the highest in history).

                    Mids and attackers are able to beat that by up to 100 points (Suarez and Salah). This makes what you said really silly.

                    I believe your point was that defenders offer more value for money?
                    This is true. The average points pr million for defenders are quite a lot higher than for mids and attackers. But when your banking this idea to the extent that you have a bench worth 2-3million more than others, you're not gonna benefit from it.

                    If you disagree, I think you should make a better case than you just did.

                2. Euro Raiders
                  • 7 Years
                  7 years, 3 months ago

                  Just seen your reply. The reason for Ings rather than a cheapie is to cover ration or late injury risk. Same as Joselu as a 2nd sub.

                  1. Euro Raiders
                    • 7 Years
                    7 years, 3 months ago

                    Ration ha ha *rotation

                  2. WesMantooth
                    • 14 Years
                    7 years, 3 months ago

                    Well. Joselu and Ings are 2.5 million more expensive than WAN and Bennet. To me, the benefit of having Ings and joselu coming off the bench when rotation hits, is not greater than having that 2.5m in your XI.

                    Also, i would not trust Rafa to play joselu every week. At least wan is more nailed.

                    1. Euro Raiders
                      • 7 Years
                      7 years, 3 months ago

                      Tell you what, here is full team planning, then maybe you can follow better:

                      Ederson - (Hamer)
                      Alonso - Holebas - Mendy - Walker - Trippier
                      Salah - Mane - Walcott/Richarlison - Moura - (Hojbjerg)
                      Firmino - (Ings) - (Joselu)

                      Maybe you get a clearer picture now!

                      1. WesMantooth
                        • 14 Years
                        7 years, 3 months ago

                        Good players, not debating that. But this doesnt change the fact that your hiding 2 million more on the bench than those that have hojbjerg-WAN-Bennet as a bench.

                        That 2 million could be used to Get Aguero over Firmino. They have huge differences in their ppg, and it also gives you a better canptaincyoption than mane/Salah over the next couple of fixtures.

                        Maybe you Get the clearer picture now?

                      2. Euro Raiders
                        • 7 Years
                        7 years, 3 months ago

                        Look, I get your point, but your point reverts my team away from 5-4-1 which is the way I have decided to play. Many defenders are outscoring both similar priced mids and forwards. Aguero is a rotation and injury risk. As for some value sitting on the bench I again agree but disagree this round, formation needs a decent 1st sub.

            2. Euro Raiders
              • 7 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              In lieu of Hazard.

              Obviously if Robertson in then Firmino goes maybe for Vardy.

      4. joeydelucchi
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        totally agree with this, im taking the 'risk' of no prem striker and going for arnie and Mitro but still deciding on my 3rd Budget striker.

        my theme this year is going for dependable consistent talismen, and after this article thinking of dropping Silva for Mane so will have a similar mid to you.

        R-A-M
        sal haz mane moura
        mitro arnie ?

        out of curiosity out of all these budget strikers , who would you go for?
        im considering wilson or zaha tbh

        (as you say, im happy with this as long as the budgets keep up , but that could easily change)

        1. SADIO SANÉ
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          great midfield - D.Silva & Sterling are the two others I'm keeping an eye on, could be great options too obviously.

          Wilson or Deeney I think - all of them on pens too I think? just need a bit of luck. Yep, think I'll be WC'ing if/when these players fail to deliver for a couple/few weeks or if/when Kane/Kaku/Laca start firing braces consistently

    4. Jealous Viper
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Great work. This should be hulked

      1. Geoff
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        When you see posts you think should be hulked, click the flag button and send it through - that will be sent to the mods, and we can get it up faster 🙂

        1. Differential C (Mark)
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Didn't know this, cheers.

        2. jtreble
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Who knew? Not me. Geoff, I’m flagging your post.

    5. Eden Wizard
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Excellent review, defenders are still going too crazy to force our money in to mid. IMO.

    6. Smurf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Sublime post. Very informative.

    7. Nanoelektronicar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      David Silva with those numbers, relative nailedonness, at least comparing him to others bar Fernandinho, and 8.5 should be considered?

      Mane vs Hazard debate, maybe I am biased as a Liverpool fan, but I think Mane is somehow underestimated. His form might be unsustainable, in terms he won't get 10+ each and every week, but I prefer him to Hazard as a more genuine goal threat.

      Mane matching Hazard last week I saw like a small victory, let's see what happens next.

    8. WesMantooth
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Disregarding all cityoptions seems a bit dratic imo. Both Sterling and Silva deserves consideration. Both have passed the eyetest for me, and imo, both are less likely to be rotated then the other attacking midfielders City's got.

      Sterling looks just as good as last season. If he's gonna average 7 points pr game (like he did last season), 11 million seems fair.

      David Silva's attacking number are even more promising than last season. With KDB out, he looks set to play more than what Pep intially thought? Would'nt be surprised at all if he was to average better numbers than last season (5,83-third best amongst mids) while KDB is missing.

      1. Rossi3254
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I certainly agree that Sterling and Silva are the best two city midfield options and there should be some consideration for them but I just feel that while KDB is out they are less likely to run away with games and score 4/5 goals as they did so regularly last season. When teams sit back against them as Newcastle did KDB is a crucial player not necessilary to create chances directly but to provide a second assist if you like, for example by playing a winger in down the side who then squares it for a tap in. Admittidly Dilva can do this also but it is far easier for teams to negate the threat of one creative player than two. Also when you look at their goals in the past two games, one was a set piece, one came from a defensive error and the other was a 30 yard screamer. I know the sample size is extremely small here but its just a feeling I have that if teams continue to set up defensively against them and are well drilled they may struggle to break them down in the absence of KDB.

        1. WesMantooth
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I fully understand your logic. Its simple really, as any team would feel missing a player as good and integral to style of play as KDB. But as you've just said, the sample size is too small to make really good assesments on how this will affect them. You've highlighted "lack of batterings" as a potential concern, but one can also look at the potential upsides, lik the ones I chose to highlight.

    9. beefo
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Nice analysis. I also went Salah-less to start the season and plan to stay that way at least until Liverpool’s rougher run of fixtures passes.

      I have Mane and have been impressed so far. That said, the player I really want is Hazard and I haven’t figured out yet how to bring him in without sacrificing Mane. I may have to give up on one/ both of Aubameyang and Mkhitaryan.

    10. firetog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      4 mid priced Mids has been my strategy from the start of the season.
      Started with Salah, Ramsey, Maddison, Richarlison and Fraser.
      Currently on Salah, Sessegnon, Maddison, Walcott and Fraser.

      Savings were allocated to premium defenders

    11. HNI
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Your article supports power 2 mid of salah+ hazard + mid priced mids. Surprised reading the article you avoiding salah then. More out of stubborness than big picture I presume?

      1. Rossi3254
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Not really stubborness it was something I considered alot at the start of the season and I came to the conclusion that I felt I was better off without Salah. The struggles of other premium mids havent changed this view just means i can go with just Hazard and spend big in both attack and defence. The reason I spoke about Salah is that I know many managers own him and I appreciate that if you do he is a good option its just not the way I decided to go

  3. BeDreamin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    His stats are good. But too high risk for this stage of the season

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Him and Vardy on a Wildcard could be a devestating differential.

      1. Chenku╰☆╮
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        could be in a bad bad way too.. more chances.

  4. Botman and Robben
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Wonder if Mane had been priced at 10.0m in the beginning, would he be 10.5m now?

    1. ColdRainyNIght
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Two blanks and everyone will ship him out, highly doubtful. I think Southampton game is not easy as it looks

      1. We Go Again
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Anfield is a fortress. Liverpool will win comfortably.

        1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Like they did v brighton

      2. Differential C (Mark)
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Southampton's lack of pace in the defence could mean a field day for Liverpool. Zaha not playing vs them was a gift, but having a pacy players vs Southampton defence=goals.

    2. La Roja
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      40% ownership. Doubt he will go that high. And fixtures ain’t looking good either. Couple of blanks for Mane and Salah hauls, casuals will sell him

      1. Ginkapo FPL
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Why only casuals?

      2. TheTwelfthMan
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Conversely couple of blanks for Salah and Mane hauls, and casuals start going the other way 😉

  5. ColdRainyNIght
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    A) Lacca + Ramsey
    B) Auba + Schuerrle

    I have a wildcard, no Fulham cover though. But is Lacca and Ramsey nailed? They could be explosive

    1. Differential C (Mark)
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Laca is on the "one to watch" category. Looked the best attackijg threat. Much better value than Auba at the moment. But the fact that Emery is still figurng out his best XI puts me off. If Laca starts this week again, it is likely he is nailed, and therefore viable.
      Keep if you have him though.

      1. Differential C (Mark)
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Laca+Schuerlle imo.
        Out of those choices, though, A.

    2. All about the Mané
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      How about Mitrovic + Ramsey?

  6. Differential C (Mark)
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Hard to consider since Aguero is in that price range. Might be a better pick than Auba though.

  7. Ginkapo FPL
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    I can see [ private ] tags

    1. dr. Phil
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      yup me too

    2. Mr. Hindsight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      It's supposed to be a members only article right after the private tag the publisher probably missed out on that "\" along with the word "private" & hence it's now visible to everyone, for now at least.

    3. Legomané
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks for flagging Ginkapo (and co.) 🙂

  8. JELLYFISH
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    This article makes GW9 look like a good GW to wild card.

    1. Ginkapo FPL
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Hmmm. You arent a member though.....

      1. Ginkapo FPL
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Davids best work is these member articles. Their top notch.

        1. Ginkapo FPL
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          *they're

        2. DavidMunday815
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Thanks for your kind words Ginkapo! Glad you're enjoying the site!

      2. JELLYFISH
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Used to be, but I stepped away from ff for a break a few years ago as it became a bit of an obsession. These days I try to control my addiction

    2. Eden Wizard
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Seems to be. I'd prefer to hold it longer and manage with 2/3 transfers over the fixture swing (never managed to keep it beyond about GW7)

  9. EL tridente
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Thoughts on this WC

    Patricio (Hamer)
    Alonso, Mendy, Holebas (Bennett, Wan-Bissaka)
    Hazard, Mané, Pedro, Fraser (Billing)
    Aguero, Lukaku, Mitrovic

    Pedro Will most likely become Richarlison in 2 GW

    1. Differential C (Mark)
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Good picks. Not a fan of a 4.5-4.0 goalkeeper duo, would rather try for a 4.5-4.5.
      Wouldnt take Kaku yet too. But everything else looks fine.

    2. Roy Rovers
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Salah

  10. Whats the Mata?
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    1. Would you give Mkhi another chance if there are no other issues in your team?

    2. Maddisson or Fraser? (Will WC gw9)

    1. TheTwelfthMan
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      No.

      Fraser.

    2. Pukki Party
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Mads

  11. goldensock
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Any advice much appreciated please

    Wildcard active. No salah

    Patricio hennessy
    Alonso mendy robertson wb holebas
    Hazard mane pedro fraser moura
    Aguero mitrovic wilson

    Pedro placeholder for richarlison

    1. Differential C (Mark)
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      This team looks like set for a BB in a particularly friendly week. G2G, but prepare for a weekly benching headache.

      1. goldensock
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Would you change anything to ease the benching headache?

        1. Differential C (Mark)
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I mean, nothing wrong with an overall good squad, I actually would like this team. If you believe in the above team, go for it.

          1. goldensock
            • 7 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            Im still debating having salah in which case I would upgrade mane to salah and sacrifice moura and robbo for neves and chilwell. Makes benching a bit easier. Robbo has tough fixtures and losing moura doesnt worry me too much. How does that compare to my first team?

            1. TurboTastic!
              • 8 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              Salah team seems better. It's going to be hard to get salah in later if you adapte your squad without him.
              And as you say. Robbo tough fixtures and if loosing Moura doesn't bother you I would go with a salah team instead.

    2. FPLzebub
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Nice team.

      1. goldensock
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Mane team or salah team?

  12. EL tridente
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    A) Kaku
    B) Auba
    or
    C) Laca

    1. ColdRainyNIght
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Im on wildcard and you have too many options in striker department. im not sure what to do, but currently I have aguero lukaku and auba. cleared all Liverpool assets. I would go for Auba, as he is more nailed, but if you need money in midfield, then get Laca

  13. ColdRainyNIght
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Anyone know the heatmap and touches in the box for Aaron Ramsey? Is he a good option?

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Members area.

    2. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      the heatmap is great 🙂

  14. NUFCAndrew
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Fraser and Wilson too much Bournemouth?

    1. FPLzebub
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Not enough. BOU have great fixtures and are in form.

    2. Differential C (Mark)
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Perfectly fine, Bournemouth looked good even vs Chelsea. Should have scored 1 or 2 imo.
      Personally would only get one, though.

      1. FPLzebub
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Apart from Wilson they are cheap enough to be benched. I've only got Him and Fraser but i'd be fine with Rico or Brooks as well. I normally avoid triple ups but when they are basically enablers it doesn't really hurt.

    3. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Nope. Have Fraser and not so King myself.

    4. bench boost for every gamew…
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Could be a little bit of a differential to have two, i have Fraser and King, and fairly happy with keeping both atm. One of the most attacking teams stats wise.

  15. Differential C (Mark)
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Hennessey
    Mendy Alonso Bennett Bellerin
    Hazard Moura Salah
    Aguero Jimenez Mitrovic

    Fabianski Walcott AwB H.Costa

    Will likely save FT this week, but having a think on my XI.

    Thoughts? Should Walcott start over someone else? AwB?

    1. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      ars defence is a no-go so far i think

    2. bench boost for every gamew…
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I think i would start Wally if he is back, as Bennett, whom admittedly have a good chance of cs but does not have the same ceiling as Wally. I would say if it´s doubt over Wally starting i would prob pick Bennett, but you also have very good options in AWB and even H.Costa. Tough choice. I like your team

  16. Woy of the Wovers
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Article doesn't specify what we should "pour over Lukaku data"

    1. FPLzebub
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Milk and sugar.

    2. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Gravy

  17. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    This article needs sub headings and sub titles.

    Good stuff, though.

  18. A19
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Good morning everyone, any ideas for what to do with this lot?

    Patricio
    Mendy Alonso Robbo
    Salah Mané Bilva Fraser
    Kun Arnie Ings

    Stek Neves Cook WanB 0.4itb

    Was planning to save this week and then Arnie -> Mitro and Bilva -> ?

    1. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      yeah, those 2 has to go

  19. Hotdogs for Tea
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    So, this article identifies Lukaku is comparable with the sub £7 mill forwards Mitro and Wilson for shots on target, shots in the box etc ... 😉

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Small sample size. Lukaku 8s gradually picking up form.

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        His form is just as likeky to tail off as he is flogged through out the Champions League fixture pile up

    2. DeathoftheParty
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Bring me the Wilson brace...

  20. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    The striker situation is so interesting this year. With Wilson, Ings, Mitrovic, Arnie, there is arguably no need for an expensive striker. Kun had his Huddersfield haul, but if he is rested or blanks v Fulham that’ll be only one haul from his opening 5 games. Auba hasn’t exactly set the world alight either. Kane is priced very aggressively for the 220-ish points he might get if he does manage 30 goals. Kaku is just... Kaku.

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Lukaku goes on runs. Could go on one soon. And with Liverpool's tough fixtures, you need a big hitter as a captaincy option.

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I started with 3 of those types, the Kun haul however set me back about a million OR places - you are forgetting the captaining issue in not having Kun at all

    3. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      i played with the idea of 3 sub7 mils uptop. amazing teams you can build that way

      1. CRO KLOPP
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Mark did that also

      2. Pasqualinho
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Sounds sensible and was attempted by a few managers on here, but I think GW2 made them rethink it and Wildcard. Were they a bit hasty in doing this or it is really too risky a move?

        1. Arn De Gothia
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          yeah, im now on Kun + two 5.5:s

        2. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Killed me and necessitates a GW3 WC

    4. Cok3y5murf
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Not this again

    5. bench boost for every gamew…
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Good point but it will create a spending problem in other areas as there is not enough premium midfielders to use the funds on? Hm, while saying that it does allow you to have Hazard in addition to both Salah and Mané, still leaving enough to have Fraser and someone in the 6.5m bracket. Hm.. Aguero is the reason why i´m not going there, yes just one haul, and his away form is a little bit to concern about, still a bit unlucky to at least have had one or two goals more. His secureness atm moment is the one thing that reason me to keep, but if rotation kicks in then it will change probably. Also, i think de Bruyne absence is a factor, because from what i´ve seen they (City) doesn´t create so many high numbers of big chances when KDB is not around. Not sure if that notion is backed by actual numbers.

  21. NUFCAndrew
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Is membership worth the money?

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Yes

      1. Chenku╰☆╮
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Yes if you want to finish higher up the ranks.. filter down the solid content from just opinions.

    2. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      yes

    3. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I don't use a lot of the members content,but this is a great site and I want to support it

    4. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Yes

    5. Limited & Mediocre Mana…
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I decided against it after two years as a member but certainly when I was a beginner it was very useful. Unfortunately not so much now as I understand the game better.

  22. Arn De Gothia
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    oh this looks good right?

    Mc Carthy / Hamer

    Rico / Alonso / Mendy / Holebas / WB

    Salah / Hazard / Dilva / Maddison / Frasier

    Aguero / Jiminez / Ings

    0,1 ITB

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Money benched and bench dilemma every week with the strong front 8 but overall a good team.

      1. Arn De Gothia
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        thanx, dont think im benching that much. the two 5.5 fw rotates and two 4,0 def rotates with one 4.5

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Rico ?

      1. Arn De Gothia
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        bournemouth, 4.5

    3. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Looks good, a decent bench is a great comfort in the coming months

      1. Arn De Gothia
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Thanx, exactly what i was thinking. yes it sucks to have points on bench but it also sucks when, say kun is rested nd you get in a one pointer

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I’d rather have the points on the bench - means you have a good player to call on, rotate and also get price rises

          These guys are a great pool to chose 4 starters from each week ... Rico / Holebas / WB / Maddison / Frasier / Jiminez / Ings

          1. Arn De Gothia
            • 15 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            amen to that

    4. Salah'd n Sauce
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Very similar to mine this one.
      I have Zaha over Jiminez in a hopeful recovery aim.

      Good team though. I'm also happy having points on the bench. I feel it gives better flexibility.

      1. Arn De Gothia
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        thanks. you must have great TV

  23. Kodap
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Need to choose one 4.5m Defender & one 4.5m Midfielder...

    Who would you go for?

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Doherty and Ward

      1. Kodap
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Why would you pick those two?

        Ward's fixtures look awful!

        1. Beavis
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Playing up front, and you shouldn't really be needing him very often as 2nd or 3rd sub.

        2. SPorting
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Doherty the main man for WOL and their fixtures are decent.

          1. Kodap
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            As in Doherty in defence?

  24. jia you
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Watched the City documentary (All or Nothing) over the past couple of days (on Amazon Prime, 30 day free trial). It was really very interesting and enjoyable (even as a MUN fan)!
    Pep really rates Bernardo it seems for his jovial personality around the place as much as anything else (Pep even stated that he wont be leaving the club as long as he is there).
    Walker & Stones seem fun guys and Mendy bloody 'ell, the man is a character!
    Didn't realise Delph was such a vocal personality at the club and Kompany is just a legend full stop!
    A must watch for footy fans!

    1. Hasselbaink Forever
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Does it get much better after the first two episodes? I watched those and thought it was quite meh.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        If you didn't take to it after the first two episodes, it's probably not your thing mate. Thought it showed some good insight into how a top EPL club operates so found it interesting myself.

        1. Hasselbaink Forever
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I'd head great things so maybe my expectations were high. Seemed a little 'glossy' to me

          1. jia you
            • 9 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            I was the opposite heard little about (being based in China and all) and didn't hold any expectations! It is a bit on the 'glossy' side for sure though! But they are a glossy club tbf!

    2. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      sounds intresting

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Def worth the watch mate, just get the free trial and cancel it before the 30 days are up 🙂

    3. JELLYFISH
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Lol @ Delph being a vocal personality. He's certainly vocal, however I can think of other descriptors for him than 'personality'.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Haha

  25. Beavis
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    For people that input FPL/Opta data and and analyse it in their own Spreadsheets, what kind of stuff do you look like?

    Keen to try doing this but wanted some ideas to work off and then develop further.

  26. Roy Rovers
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Good moves....Y or N

    This week
    BSilva > Fraser

    Next week
    Stephens > Richarlison

    Pat. Hamer.
    VVD. Mendy. Alonso. Shaw. WB.
    Salah. Hazard. Neves. BSILVA. STEPHENS.
    Kun. Mitro. Ings.

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Would be tempted to hold Bernardo with this fixture.

      1. Roy Rovers
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Yep could do....just don’t trust Pep...Fraser (LEI)

    2. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      i would

    3. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Hold

    4. WVA
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Exact cash? Stephens droppping

      1. Roy Rovers
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        0.1 ITB!

  27. FortunesAlwaysHiding
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Advice appreciated here guys, keep Lovren for a draft league game or get rid for Rico? Can rotate with Chilwell and Digne.

    1. Dyballer
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Tough one, but I’d get rid for Rico. Lovren isn’t as nailed as we’d hoped with Gomez playing well and Matip still around. Klopp wants to rotate too. LIV’s fixtures aren’t great either. I expect them to win most but not keep many clean sheets. The only LIV defenders I would have kept are Robbo and maybe VD.

  28. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    @mods I can see this article and I'm not supposed to be able to... Member articles look good though 😛

    1. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      This is a first ever non members article only

      1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Nevermind I can't see it anymore. Still, might get membership next year.

  29. FPL Marc
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    This Wildcard is difficult. Initially, my plan was to downgrade Salah and spread the money out to get Hazard - Mane - Kane - Aguero.

    But I just can't drop Salah... yet Hazard - Mane - Salah would be an unnecessarily expensive midfield and, if it comes down to preferring a 6.5 mid or 6.5 for, I'd say both are equally strong pools.

    So would you go with Salah or Kane? Or be braver and go without both?

    1. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      That's why I haven't wildcarded yet,cant decide

    2. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      If you like a calculated risk, the next 4 are a great time for a Kane punt.
      If you're risk averse, probably stick with Salah.

    3. Arn De Gothia
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      im in same boat... think im keeping Salah, dropping Mane

    4. Hasselbaink Forever
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Salah, Kane has not looked anything like his best.

      1. FPL Marc
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Would you then drop Hazard or Mane? To fit Salah.

        1. Hasselbaink Forever
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          That's a harder question. I have Salah and Mane at the moment, not quite prepared to drop one just yet. My plan before last week was to do Mane > Hazard, but holding off on that for now. Maybe think about captaincy - would you be prepared to captain Mane regularly?

  30. jia you
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    102.4, bloody hell, never had a TV this high early on!
    The funny thing is I haven't been monitoring the price changes at all this season!

    1. JELLYFISH
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      That's good tv. It will serve you well when you wc. I'm currently at 102.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Seems that many on here are on 102 or close to it at least! Which seems a bit unusual after 4GWs!

    2. Badgevilla
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      But what is the SV having all that money doesn't help if you can't spend that extra 1 million!

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        100.9 SV

        1. jia you
          • 9 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          8 players only one rise away from an extra 0.1 also!