862 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Valar(Keith)
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Love my team but it's really struggling without Watkins and Trippier

    Areola (Turner)
    Udogie Burn Cash (BOTMAN Kabore)
    Salah Son Maddison Saka MBEUMO
    Haaland Alvarez (Archer)

    2 FTs, 0.3 in the bank

    Plan was
    A) Botman and Mbeumo to Gabriel and Mitoma

    Should I twist and do

    B) Play WC and get Watkins, Trippier, Gordon, Tsimikas, Palmer in Place of Mbeumo , Son, Archer, Cash, Burn

    1. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Thats the problem if u want salah.

      1. Valar(Keith)
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Can easily get Trips and Watkins in on WC. Have had salah all season and money really isn't that tight. Its just that it would be a 12 point hit to get those 2 in and I'm not sure if it's worth wasting a WC when my squad is pretty good as it stands.

    2. DMP
      3 years, 1 day ago

      What’s wrong with your team?

      A looks fine!

      1. Valar(Keith)
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Tbh that's all I needed to hear. My defense and attack look great minus maybe Trippier, Bowen, Watkins. Can't have them all I guess(could do Botman and Mbeumo to Bowen and Branthwaithe too though I'm sick of a non existent bench)

        Holding my WC for so long also seems to have a diminishing value component to it though.. that being said it's a get out of jail free card.. can hold onto it and make risky early transfers until injuries catch up to me.

        Thanks. Will just stick and wait for my now non template team to catch up with the trips/Watkins teams

        1. DMP
          3 years, 1 day ago

          My teamlooks weaker than yours on paper and considering saving my Wildcard.

          Jonhstone (Turner)
          Udogie Cash Burn ( Kabore Baldock)
          Salah Son Bruno Mbeumo Sterling
          Halland Alvarez (Archer)

          Bruno to Saka was the plan, but maybe an hit for Bruno+Archer to Palmer and Watkins and go 4x3x3.

  2. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Greetings all!! …..

    Would you sacrifice Son(have Maddy) if it meant you could have Saka and Watkins too and keep Trippier and Alvarez and go 3-4-3???…..

    A- Yes
    Or
    B- No

    Cheers everyone!!!

    1. OptimusBlack
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I can't get ur question

      1. Bob_the_builder
        3 years, 1 day ago

        The question essentially is :

        Is moving out Son a good move if it means bringing in Watkins and Saka?

        1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
          3 years, 1 day ago

          That’s it mate!! Maybe a poorly worded and long winded way of getting the point across haha silly me

        2. jacob1989
          3 years, 1 day ago

          I would say yes

          1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Cheers mate!!!

        3. OptimusBlack
          3 years, 1 day ago

          Yes

    2. waltzingmatildas
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

      1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Cheers mate!! Leaning that way too!!

    3. ted mcnure
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A reluctant Yes from me..

      1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Cheers mate!! It’s always hard to consider losing Son

    4. OptimusBlack
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

      1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Thanks mate!!

  3. OptimusBlack
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Which is better lot
    A- Burn Son Mitoma ( Taylor)
    B- Trippier Maddison Palmer (Tisimikas )
    C- Trippier Maddison Douglas
    ( Taylor)

    1. waltzingmatildas
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

      1. ted mcnure
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Yeah B

  4. g40steve
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Best cheap mids, Gordon, Palmer, Luiz rate order?

    1. waltzingmatildas
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Do you need to play them straight away?

    2. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Palmer luiz gordon

    3. _Ninja_
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Gordon just ahead of the other 2 for me. Luiz only returns at home, of the 4 home games in the next 8, 2 are CITY and ARS.

      Palmer has poor fixtures but on pens so good value.

    4. House Frey Wedding Planner
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Gordon first choice. If you need the money then Palmer over Luiz

    5. OptimusBlack
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Good question

    6. g40steve
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Gordon & Palmer cheers

  5. Bob_the_builder
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Son (already own Maddison) +Botman+JWP to Trippier+Saka+Palmer for -8.

    Yes or no?

    (Will wait after the Spurs game if yes)

    1. camaraderie
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Nice moves

    2. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Don't like -8. But moves are good

  6. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    The team is really dull and template but it's also performing well.

    2 FTs. What do I do?

    Areola Turner
    Cash Porro Burn Guehi Lamptey
    Salah Son Maddison Bowen Chukwuemeka
    Haaland Alvarez Watkins

    0.1m ITB

    A) Son > Saka
    B) Son + Guehi > Trippier + Mitoma
    C) Do 1 fodder transfer and roll again (Lamptey > Taylor)

    1. snow pea in repose
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B) looks like a strong move

    2. _Ninja_
      3 years, 1 day ago

      If Son get's subbed early again tomorrow probably A

      1. _Ninja_
        3 years, 1 day ago

        but B also looks good.

    3. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Me too thinking A but lets see how son does cs Fulham

    4. ted mcnure
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Ouch! From those, prob C, depending on Son tomorrow..

  7. Feed tha Sheep
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Best way to get Watkins into my team? (2FTs 0ITB)

    Areola Turner
    Trippier Burn Cash Mitchell Kabore
    Son Maddison Salah Bowen Gordon
    Haaland Alvarez Archer

    A. Son & Alvarez & Mitchell > Saka Watkins & 4.0 def (-4)
    B. Alvarez & Bowen > Watkins & Palmer
    C. Archer & Son > Watkins & Palmer
    D. Something else?

    1. _Ninja_
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I'm temped by C but with Neto

      1. _Ninja_
        3 years, 1 day ago

        I'm waiting until tomorrow night of course.

      2. Feed tha Sheep
        3 years, 1 day ago

        0.2 off Neto? 5.6 is the most I can afford?

    2. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      C

    3. House Frey Wedding Planner
      3 years, 1 day ago

      C

  8. Saka Punch
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Hey guys, struggling without Trippier and Watkins. Would you do either of these:

    A) Estupinian, Son, Mbeumo -> Trippier, Saka, Gordon (-4)

    Or

    B) Estupinian, Son, Mbeumo, Archer -> Trippier, Gordon (bench rotation), Palmer (bench rotation), Watkins (-8)

    1. House Frey Wedding Planner
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

  9. The Parrot
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Just hit the WC button, couldn't let those prices get away from me

    Areola / Turner
    Trippier / Udogie / Cash / Branthwaite / Taylor
    Salah / Saka / Bowen / Mitoma / Palmer
    Haaland / Alvarez / Watkins

    0.1itm

    Very light on the bench but all playing..

    Might see changes during the week if any injuries pop up.

    What do you think?

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      No Spurs attackers is brave. Could work though.

      1. The Parrot
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Dunno where I'd fit them in..
        Trippier down to Burn and Bowen/Mitoma up maybe.. but don't think that's better

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          3 years, 1 day ago

          I like it tbh. If I WC'd this week I'd make pretty much this team.

          1. The Parrot
            3 years, 1 day ago

            Cheers mate. Gave me the boost of confidence I needed!

  10. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Thoughts on Johnstone+Areola combo on WC? They rotate very well and I think Johnstone is worth the extra and Areola covers his bad fixtures for a while

    1. _Ninja_
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yeah look's good.

    2. JBG
      3 years, 1 day ago

      If you don't need the extra £ from having Turner instead, do it.

  11. DA Minnion (Former great)
    3 years, 1 day ago

    How does this look.
    Botman Son and Alvarez to
    Trippier Neto and Watkins for a minus 4.
    Already have Maddison and Haaland. Good moves?

  12. JBG
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Which transfers?

    A) Botman*+Foden to Trippier+D.Luiz -4

    B) Foden+Alvarez to Mitoma+Watkins -4

    *If Botman is really out to 11.Nov as it says on FPL arm.

    Shameless reportasjer, cause no respond.

    1. JBG
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Repost* god damn norwegian autocorrect.

  13. hbyart95
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Son and Darwin for Saka and Watkins?

  14. camaraderie
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Goof to go?
    Areola
    Trippier, Cash, Udogie
    Salah(c), Son, Maddison, Palmer
    Haaland(v), Watkins, Alvarez

    Turner, Neto, Taylor, Kabore

    1ft. Maddison or Son to Saka

  15. BobB
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Watkins must be a strong captaincy option home to Luton next week

    1. jacob1989
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Just had same thought. See below

  16. jacob1989
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Gonna c watkins next gw. Can honestly see aston villa winning 5-0.. but Knowing fpl luck it probably will be 1-0 with d luiz penalty

    1. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      But Watkins assist!

  17. ryanjt801
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Areola (Leno)
    Burn, Porro, Cash (Taylor, Kabore)
    Mads, Almiron, Son, Salah (Anderson)
    Haaland, Alvarez, Watkins

    2FT 0.4ITB

    A - Mads, Almiron to Saka, Gordon
    B - Son, Almiron to Saka, Mitoma

    1. Saka Punch
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B imo

    2. House Frey Wedding Planner
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

    3. ted mcnure
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B please

  18. pundit of punts
    3 years, 1 day ago

    GTG?

    Areola
    Cash - Burn - Gabriel
    Salah - Son - Saka - Bowen - Mitoma
    Haaland - Watkins

    3.9 - Archer - Taylor - Branthwaite

    FTs used. Nothing in the bank. Thoughts? 🙂

    1. ted mcnure
      3 years, 1 day ago

      That is one hell of a wobbly bench, but solid 11..GL

  19. have you seen cyan
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Andy has serious delusions I think. He still going on about Man U assets.

    1. x.jim.x
      3 years, 1 day ago

      He’s not called AndyLetsTalkShite for nowt

      1. have you seen cyan
        3 years, 1 day ago

        he does make me laugh 😀

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Well, the heard following him is going to be punished 🙂

  20. Weak Become Heros
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Had a good old Sunday night tinker after a few glasses of red. Very happy with this but want to sound you guys out please.

    Maddison, Mbuemo, Alvarez, Morris OUT
    Saka, Mitoma, Watkins, Archer IN

    Areola
    Trips Cash Porro
    Salah Saka Mitoma JWP Diaby
    Haaland Watkins

    Kaminski Archer Botman Kabore

    1. g40steve
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Optimal fwd Watkins Alvarez Haaland, 343

  21. House Frey Wedding Planner
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Areola Leno
    Botman Burn Cash Andersen Udogie
    Son Maddison Foden Salah Gordon
    Haaland Alvarez Archer

    2FT, 1.5itb

    Initial plan was to take a -4 to bring in Saka, Bowen and Gabriel/Tsimikas for Foden, Botman and one of the Spurs midfielders. After watching the Villa game and with their good upcoming fixtures, I feel not having Watkins could be painful.

    What's the best move to do here?

    A - The initial plan
    B - Foden, Son and Archer to Bowen, Mitoma, Watkins (-4)
    C - Haaland, Foden, Son/Maddison to Saka, Bowen, Watkins (-4)
    D - Foden, Son, Archer, Gordon to Saka, Bowen, Watkins, Anderson (-8)

    Cheers

    1. Old Wulfrunian
      3 years, 1 day ago

      b

    2. ted mcnure
      3 years, 1 day ago

      B

  22. Old Wulfrunian
    3 years, 1 day ago

    On WC,which one?

    A)3-4-3 with Alvarez
    B)3-5-2 with Diaby

    1. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      A

  23. Milk, 1 Šuker
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Beware the curse of the most transferred in player. This week I believe it will be Watkins.

    1. Weak Become Heros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Who was most brought in this week?

    2. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Think Trippier has since put at end to that

    3. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Trippier broke the curse
      Watkins was the most transferred in player this week too

  24. DARE TO BISCAN
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Son, Mbeumo, Alvarez > Salah, Luiz, Watkins -8

    a) do it
    b) calm your tits down

    1. Dammit_182
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Depends how much you want salah and how many times you’re going to give him the arm band.

      I like 2/3 players your are losing and 3\3 you’re getting in.

      Should probably give your tits a nice cup of Horlix or something to see how they feel about things after a nice little rest though.

      This week is a ‘fixture swing’ so taking hits without a WC might be a popular move and son is prime for this.

      Alvarez to Watkins might be the one to drop if you fancied a -4 only as both are great forwards.

      1. DARE TO BISCAN
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Yeah. Might have to wait on Watkins. Maybe 3-4-3 later on. Very tempting just to have done with it and take the hits now.

  25. AF90
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Areola Turner
    Cash Udogie Gabriel Botman Kabore
    Salah Saka Mbeumo Diaby Son
    Haaland Alvarez Mubama

    Can't go into the next few weeks without Watkins so...

    Son & Mubama -> Palmer & Watkins -4?

  26. Saka Punch
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Hey guys, struggling without Trippier and Watkins. Would you do either of these:

    A) Estupinian, Son, Mbeumo -> Trippier, Saka, Gordon (-4)

    Or:

    B) Estupinian, Son, Mbeumo, Archer -> Trippier, Gordon, Palmer, Watkins (-8)

  27. leocarter27
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Thoughts please on the WC?

    Areola / Turner

    Trippier Cash Gabriel / Tsimikas Taylor

    Mitoma Salah Saka Bowen Palmer

    Watkins Haaland / Archer

    0.6 ITB what could I do with it? Cheers

    1. Saka Punch
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Nice

  28. Make FPL Casual Again
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Apart from pens, Palmer should be a decent option, right ?

    Couple of assists, improving CHE (!), next couple if fixtures decent...young and improving talent

    Potentially not far off Gordon/Neto etc...

    1. Thunderbastard
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Terrible fixtures but a great enabler

      1. Make FPL Casual Again
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Dunno...only 2 very dificult fixtures in next 5....new/city

        Che just put 2 past Ars

    2. GC123
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Yep. Bought him in three weeks ago. Has worked out well other than I benched him this week due to the flag

  29. Thunderbastard
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Best 4.6 Def on WC

    Have

    Johnstone Areola

    Gabriel Cash Tsimikas Branthwaite --- ?----

    1. Buck The Trent
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Guehi ?

      1. Thunderbastard
        3 years, 1 day ago

        Palace double up with Johnstone?

  30. Milk, 1 Šuker
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    3 years, 1 day ago

    Mitoma has a lovely set of fixtures coming up. Because of affordability might get him in instead of Watkins (have Alvarez) alongside Saka with two free transfers. Good moves?

    1. Milk, 1 Šuker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      3 years, 1 day ago

      Mitoma would replace JWP

    2. Heskey Time
      3 years, 1 day ago

      I have a similar dilemma.

      Thinking I’m either going to do: Doku & Alvarez -> Watkins & Gordon (-4)

      Or just Doku -> Mitoma

      It’s the case of you can’t have them all currently. So many options