Chip Strategy
9 September 2026 444 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers who have yet to play their Triple Captain chip have a choice to make: use it on Cole Palmer (£9.6m) – or another Chelsea asset – in Gameweek 4, or save it for later.

Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of backing Palmer this weekend.

This article features data and screenshots from our new FPL Toolkit.

PROS

Thiago, Palmer v Rogers, sell Man Utd players? FPL Q&A

THE FIXTURE

The visit of Hull City perhaps doesn’t look as favourable as it did a few weeks prior, yet it remains a home match against newly-promoted opposition.

Although Sergej Jakirovic’s men are yet to concede, both Aston Villa and Manchester United have generated more than 1.8 expected goals (xG) in their respective matches with the Tigers.

Furthermore, Palmer is projected to score 7.7 points by Rate My Team (RMT) in this fixture:

That’s the most of any player until Erling Haaland (£15.5m) faces Ipswich Town and Hull (more on that later).

ALONSO HAS CHELSEA FIRING

It’s not just the fixture, however.

Chelsea’s attack looks completely rejuvenated under Xabi Alonso.

The Blues are already the division’s joint-top scorers, with eight goals in three matches:

That’s despite coming up against Arsenal and Brighton and Hove Albion, two of the top three teams for fewest goals conceded in 2025/26.

In terms of underlying data, Chelsea sit fifth for non-penalty expected goals (NPxG), with 5.56. 

SOLID STATS/SET PLAY BOOST

Palmer has bounced back under Alonso.

With more freedom to drift around the pitch, he’s scored two goals and supplied one assist in three matches.

In that time, he has taken the third-most shots of any player (12), behind only Bruno Fernandes (£12.0m) and Haaland.

In a further boost, Palmer is also on penalties, plus a share of set plays.

Austin MacPhee’s choreographed set-pieces look dangerous, too.

GOOD XMINS

With Palmer resting up over the summer and Chelsea not in Europe, it means he is unlikely to be rotated or subbed off early.

Indeed, the 24-year-old is averaging 87.3 minutes per start across the first three Gameweeks.     

Chelsea play Sunday-Wednesday-Saturday this week, but they’ve only been in EFL Cup action in midweek. Palmer was, encouragingly, limited to 45 minutes in the cup – and he scored twice!

LOW-ISH OWNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY

Palmer is only the 12th most-selected player in FPL, with 22.3% ownership.

It will naturally increase as we approach Saturday’s deadline, but compared to Haaland (71.2% ownership) and Fernandes (46.1% ownership), it certainly amplifies the potential impact of the Triple Captain chip.

Joao Pedro’s (£7.7m) effective ownership will likely exceed Palmer’s, too, so there’s no denying its power if he does haul.  


THE CONS

Who were the cheapest starting players in FPL Gameweek 1? 9

HULL’S DEFENSIVE STRUCTURE

Hull are unbeaten and yet to concede a goal after three Gameweeks.

Is this fixture perhaps less one-sided than we initially thought, then?

Comfortable without the ball, the Tigers certainly have the defensive structure to frustrate Chelsea.

Notably, in their first two matches, when they scored seven goals against Fulham and Brighton, Alonso’s men averaged only 32.6% possession.

Quite a few of their goals have arrived from fast breaks, too, so they’ll potentially have to find new ways to break down Hull’s deep defensive block on Saturday.

GAMEWEEK 16 BETTER?

You could argue that there is a better Gameweek to use the Triple Captain chip.

You might prefer a Haaland home fixture, for example.

The Norwegian plays Ipswich in Gameweek 7 and Hull in Gameweek 16. Rate My Team has both of these matches as the best Triple Captain opportunities in the first half of the season.

  • Haaland v Hull (h): Gameweek 16 (8.21 projected points)
  • Haaland v Ipswich (h): Gameweek 7 (7.94 projected points)
  • Palmer v Hull (h): Gameweek 4 (7.73 projected points)
  • Saka v Hull (h): Gameweek 10 (7.47 projected points)
  • Fernandes v Coventry (h): Gameweek 14 (7.39 projected points

We don’t know what condition Haaland will be in by Gameweek 16, of course.

In the lead-up to the Ipswich match, Manchester City will also face Liverpool and Paris Saint-Germain.

But even if this puts you off, there are alternatives to consider outside of Haaland and Palmer. You might even want to Triple Captain someone no one else is.

LACK OF INFORMATION

Another potential issue is that we’ve only seen three Gameweeks of action.

Might a few more weeks of analysis be useful, just to learn more about teams like Fulham, Crystal Palace etc?

Fulham have looked shaky defensively in their first three matches under Alvaro Arbeloa, while Palace have already conceded eight times, the joint-most of any team.

If these defensive trends continue, it could throw up further Triple Captain opportunities, such as Haaland at home to Fulham in Gameweek 11.


FINAL WORD

FPL notes: Another Palmer pen, Cucurella injury + why Calvert-Lewin missed out

Palmer and Chelsea have made a really positive start to the season.

So have Hull, of course.

Waiting for another Triple Captain opportunity further down the line is perfectly viable, then.

On the other hand, although Hull haven’t conceded a goal in their first three matches, they rank 15th for non-penalty expected goals conceded (NPxGC), with 5.05, so they have been aided by some luck in certain situations.

Indeed, in their match against Aston Villa on Saturday, a team that is yet to score this season, Unai Emery’s men created a couple of very decent opportunities, which are captured below.

In addition, we don’t yet know how Hull will react when they fall behind.

Will they have to adopt a slightly more adventurous approach, potentially leaving space for Palmer and co to exploit?

Certainly, if you want to strike early rather than wait for later, when Enzo Maresca may choose to rotate Haaland during busy periods, this fixture looks like a good one to attack. In FPL, ‘better the devil you know’ isn’t a bad mantra.

If you don’t own Palmer, you could, of course, consider using the Triple Captain on Joao Pedro. However, without penalties, free-kicks or corners, he has fewer routes to scoring points.


Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below…


444 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Calippo
    • 5 Years
    21 mins ago

    Been tinkering with this wildcard all week. Please, let me know what you think.

    Kinsky (Leno)
    Konsa, Calafiori, De Cuyper, (Shaw, Hall)
    Gakpo, Palmer(C), Cherki, Ødegaard (Slater)
    Wissa, Haaland, João Pedro

    £2.0m ITB

    Just did Mbuemo+Egan >Slater+Hall to have 2.0 ITB. Shaw (4.4)is in there because he’s cheap, and Slater is a permanent bench.

    1. Obi 1 Kenobi 0
      • 1 Year
      18 mins ago

      I like the Gakpo pick, I was toying with him vs Szob but went for the safer option

      1. Calippo
        • 5 Years
        2 mins ago

        Thanks, trying to stay away from the Szobo train. But can always downgrade Gakpo to Szobo if Gakpo is not getting minutes or points

        1. g40steve
          • 8 Years
          1 min ago

          Gakpo abductor problems

    2. RashFraud
      • 9 Years
      11 mins ago

      Have you thought about Newcastle midfield cover with Barnes and Elanga given the upcoming fixtures? Also, if you think a Newcastle triple up is too much, you could switch Wissa out for Gonzalo Garcia (playing 3 promoted teams after the United game) or Barry

  2. Obi 1 Kenobi 0
    • 1 Year
    19 mins ago

    W/C GTG? Thoughts please:

    Verb/Kinsky
    Konsa/Cala/De Cuyper/Botman/Mendy
    Palmer/Szob/Odegaard/KDH/Gomez
    Isak/Haaland/Pedro

    1. RashFraud
      • 9 Years
      4 mins ago

      Like it! Big at the top!

  3. TafOnTour1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    15 mins ago

    Alex Scott or Marcus Tavernier?!

    1. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      7 mins ago

      Tav

      1. RashFraud
        • 9 Years
        4 mins ago

        +1

    2. JBG
      • 8 Years
      6 mins ago

      Scott

  4. RashFraud
    • 9 Years
    13 mins ago

    White + Barnes > Konsa + Rogers worth a -4? Have Gabriel, Calafiori, Palmer and JP already

    1. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      7 mins ago

      Nope

  5. Good to go? Diop comes on in case Dedic does not feature.

    Kinsky
    Califiori Kadioglu Dedic
    Bruno Palmer Semenyo Gross Sangare
    Haaland Pedro

    Dubravka Diop Thomas Elegi

  6. Z3US
    • 9 Years
    6 mins ago

    On WC final slot - long term best defender up to 5.1m?

    Hall?
    Neco Williams?
    Jacquet?
    Muhamerovic?
    Vuskovic?
    De Cuyper?

    Anyone else I've missed? Thanks

    1. RashFraud
      • 9 Years
      4 mins ago

      Hall or Neco. Prefer hall myself

      1. The Polymath
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 mins ago

        Hall

    2. JBG
      • 8 Years
      2 mins ago

      Probably Hall

    3. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      just now

      It’s Muha or Vuskovic. Newcastle defence hasn’t convinced me so far and, despite Hall’s attacking threat, the others will be better for DefCon and have some set piece threat of their own

  7. The Polymath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 mins ago

    Ajayi or Egan on a WC?

    Seems like there's move love for Egan, but not sure why?

    1. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      2 mins ago

      DefCon

    2. JBG
      • 8 Years
      1 min ago

      Defcons

  8. John Colby (C)
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    5 mins ago

    Differentials:

    Def: Porro
    Mid: Tavernier - Barnes
    For: Marmoush

    There’s not much talk about the above differentials for the coming weeks. Any reason why and are there any others who should be considered?

    Also - Chelsea’s attack looked devastating in the second half of last night’s league cup game. But do they have the fixtures to follow Hull to merit double and triple-up attack. I’m not so sure. What are your thoughts please.