Say What
9 February 2017 919 comments
davidwardale davidwardale
Share:

This week’s Say What is brought to you by the letter ‘I’.

Not I for intelligence – this is footballers we’re talking about here. Nor is it I for inane – the day Michael Owen makes it into this column is the day we all need to book into a specialist Swiss clinic.

No, Say What is all about I for instinct: that most basic of footballing impulses since Sharon Stone switched her legs around and showed us her world class Rabona.

So we have Hazard, Lukaku and Kane giving us the I, while Mourinho somehow manages to take the credit for everyone else’s success and Guardiola continues to insist that Aguero, much like the Beatles, is bigger than Jesus.

Hazard On Fire, No Danger

When Charles Dickens penned Great Expectations, he was clearly foretelling the Chelsea career of Eden Hazard.

The classic, after all, is about a small lad who finds his fortune in London courtesy of a mysterious overseas investor with a dodgy past.

When expectations are so high, however, disappointment inevitably seems to follow.

So while Chelsea have been a consistent source of major returns this season, the feeling is that Eden ‘Pip’ Hazard has provided plenty of hard times for his Fantasy followers.

Two seasons ago, he was our mutual friend. Last year, he was a load of Martin Chuzzlewit. But now…

“I am a better player, more complete, than I was. We are in better form as a team. Two years ago I was on fire but I can score more goals this season. I already have 10. Two years ago I finished with 14. We have a lot of games to play, so we will see.”

A superb strike against Arsenal helped the wide man to his first double-digit haul since Gameweek 18 and despite some wild price and ownership fluctuations (from 9.8 to 10.5 and 571,000 to 1.6 million), he’s far and away Chelsea’s most productive midfielder. In fact, only Alexis Sanchez can beat his 145 points for the season.

Hazard’s reasons for this are refreshingly simple.

“It’s not because my position is different now. It’s just because I want to score. People want me to score a lot of goals, so I try to take the ball close to the goal and shoot more. I think this season I’ve been shooting more than before and I think that is the key.”

The stats back up that last assertion. If we compare this campaign to his player of the year stint from 2014-15, Hazard is slightly up for attempts, shots on target and shot accuracy, and well ahead for minutes per attempt – 38.5 this season, as opposed to 45.2 two years ago.

He’s also in the top five for penalty area touches and conversion rate (among midfielders who’ve played at least 20 times) and in the top ten for minutes per goal this year.

But beyond those numbers, Hazard is rather less analytical regarding his success.

“It’s instinct. I don’t think too much. It’s instinct.”

Not that he’s keen to channel his inner Sharon Stone, preferring instead something rather more ’50 Shades’.

“When I get a lot of kicks, I really feel in the game. When people don’t touch me, that means I’m not doing well, I’m no good. I’m not saying I like to be kicked, but it’s good for me.”

Yes, Eden, you’ve been a very, very naughty boy.

And even with a likely Gameweek 28 blank against Watford to factor in, Chelsea’s upcoming fixtures – Burnley, West Ham and Stoke away, Swansea and Palace at home – suggests more pain for him, more pleasure for us.

Time To Take The Lukaku Challenge?

There’s plenty of pleasure in owning Everton’s Romelu Lukaku at the moment thanks to his four goals against Bournemouth.

You’ll never guess how he explained that feat.

“Everything I do in training is about instinct and I’m really happy that everything worked. When I was driving in to the stadium I had a good feeling. It’s just about instincts really.”

The standard instinct when it comes to owning Lukaku is to look at the fixtures, make him captain and then hide behind the sofa watching the match through the cracks in the hands that cover your eyes.

The Belgian, after all, is streakier than a packet of Best Buy bacon, scoring a hat-trick one week, blanking for what feels like an eternity the next.

And yet his worst goalless run this season lasted only four matches, which included trips to Chelsea and Southampton (back when they could defend) and a home clash with Man United.

At least a lot of that new-found consistency has noting to do with instinct, thankfully.

“When he (Ronald Koeman) came in, he had these ideas, and concepts of players, so for us we had to adapt because we worked under Roberto Martinez and it was a totally different style of football. But I think we adapted well, we are seventh in the league and everything is positive. It’s been good. The consistency is still there, but like I said there is room for improvement. I think there is a little change, obviously, players going and coming. Obviously the atmosphere is a bit different because you are entering the second half of the season when all the teams are getting into the rhythm.”

Everton are certainly in that rhythm – unbeaten in seven matches, including that 4-0 win over Man City in which Lukaku scored. Small wonder then that his ownership has remained above the million mark since Gameweek 9.

In fact, it’s more surprising that it’s not gone a lot higher than a Gameweek 12 peak of just under 1.5 million.

Everton’s guaranteed Gameweek 28 home match with West Brom, together with further Goodison fixtures against Sunderland and Hull and a trip to Middlesbrough over the next five Gameweeks, will surely push Lukaku’s ownership towards the two million mark.

He’s certainly talking the talk.

“I want to improve every day and deliver more and more. So the challenge is there and I want to take it.”

There’s a strong sense that we should take that challenge too.

The Kane Gang Is Shrinking

Someone just two goals behind Lukaku at present is Tottenham’s Harry Kane.

Why mention him here? You’ll understand when he explains what goal scoring is all about.

“It’s instinct, natural. When that ball drops to me my body takes over and my mind is just blank really. I couldn’t tell you what is in my head at that moment because, really, there is nothing, only focus. Then the goal is pure joy. But how does it happen? We don’t really know…”

That’s it. The word ‘instinct’ will not appear again in this article. Guaranteed. Rest assured. You have my word.

Although talking of instinct, ours has been to distrust Kane this year. He’s never managed to hit the million mark for ownership this season despite delivering 14 goals from just 19 starts.

That makes him a differential, of sorts. Well, as much of a differential as someone with 20.4% ownership can ever be.

But he has the form – six goals in his last six matches – and fixtures on his side. Tottenham travel to Liverpool this weekend and then their schedule up to Gameweek 35 is so easy that you’ll have to check it out for yourself to make it at least feel a little bit like hard work.

And even the one potential spanner in the works – missing Gameweek 28 because of the FA Cup quarter-finals – might not occur. Spurs are away at Fulham in the fifth round, which is arguably the toughest tie any of the Premier League teams still standing in the competition will face.

The instinct of Fantasy managers is to ditch Kane – he’s the Gameweek’s third most popular transfer out. Not far behind him is Zlatan Ibrahimovic, and yet the Swede costs 0.3 more, will definitely miss Gameweek 26 (which Kane won’t) and is likely to have a Gameweek 28 blank as well if United can overcome Blackburn in the FA Cup.

Okay, so United’s schedule is just as pleasant as Tottenham’s in the short to medium term.

But Kane is cheaper, in arguably more explosive form and owned by 20% fewer managers than Zlatan.

So it might be wise to ditch the instinct and stick to the facts.

How Low Can Sergio Go?

One striker with even greater ownership issues is Sergio Aguero.

He’s currently in just 17.8% of Fantasy squads and has only been less popular when he was serving a four-stretch for his studs-up meet and greet with David Luiz’ upper body.

Sergio is currently nestled between Harry and Zlatan for transfers out this week for two reasons:

1) Jesus

2) Jesus! City are almost certain to miss Gameweeks 26 and 28

But Pep Guardiola is still insisting that reason number 1 is no reason at all.

“I understand the debate but there is no doubt about the quality of Sergio. I can say how happy I am with what he did – except the seven games when he was banned. Sergio remains the most, or one of the most, important players in our squad. Without him it will not be possible. This guy (Jesus) arrives, he played good. That’s why he was playing but they can play together. Gabriel can play on the left. Now I have many options up front.”

There’s more than a whiff of a charm offensive about Guardiola and Aguero at the moment. In fact, in the next comment he manages to be both charming and offensive.

“It has not been easy for Sergio, but there are five guys in this position and he remains one of the most important players in our squad. He’s going to play with and without Gabriel, but today I decided to stick with the three guys up front because they played so well against Palace and West Ham. His reaction to not starting today was perfect. Don’t worry about that. It is difficult to leave players like Bravo, Fernando, Otamendi and Kelechi out because they all deserve to play.”

Mentioning Aguero in the same breath as Claudio Bravo? Get your agent on the phone, Sergio, it’s time for a move.

Jesus, meanwhile, has been busy buttering up the boss.

“He’s crazy about football, like me. Twenty-four hours a day! When I’m not training or playing, I’m watching football or watching something football related on my phone, or about our next rival. We have that thing in common. I play football video games too. He’s a good guy. For the short time I’ve been here I’ve realised he’s a really good guy. He deserves everything he has won in his career.”

If we’re talking video games, Jesus is currently Pro Evo 4 and Aguero is Chris Kamara Street Soccer.

But the point about who should be starting might well already be a moot one.

The likelihood of just two matches in the next four for City is bad enough, but the three fixtures after that involve Liverpool at home and Arsenal and Chelsea away.

So really, the 136,000+ who’ve bought into Jesus this week should be castigated for their short-termism, while the 17.8% still holding on to Aguero really need to look elsewhere.

Because however good Pep’s men are suddenly looking again – and Jesus has to take plenty of the credit for that – two blanks and then three tough tests in a row means the message from the City is crystal clear: sell, sell, sell!

I’m Still Special, My Team Less So

The message coming out of United, meanwhile, is a typical Mourinho mash-up.

Firstly, Jose decides to thank himself for everyone else’s excellence.

“My team is playing very well. But for many, many years in my career – especially in this country when my teams were ruthless and when my teams were phenomenal defensively and very good on the counter-attack – I listened, week after week, how that was not enough in spite of winning the title three times. It looks like, this season, to be phenomenal defensively and in counter-attack is art, so it is a big change in England.”

Ahem. Bitter much, Jose? Bitter enough to claim that a Chelsea side he no longer manages is a mere 14 points clear of a United side he currently does.

But he’s soon off the subject of his own brilliance as art’s creator and on to the limitations of his team.

“Some of our players from these attacking creative positions they could – they should – score more goals. When you see the number of goals we score, there is not a true relation between our attacking production and the number of payers we put in attacking positions and the number of goals we score.”

The three goals United put past Leicester at the weekend was only the fifth time they’ve scored more than twice in a match all season.

Small wonder, then, that only Zlatan (41.4%) finds himself in the top ten owned strikers or midfielders among United players. In fact, he and David de Gea (33.9%) are the only two Red Devils owned by more than 10% of FPL managers.

United have scored 36 goals this season, which puts them seventh in that particular league table. That sounds okay, but such gung-ho, all out attack outfits as West Brom have managed 32 with considerably less attacking assets at their disposal and Tony ‘Defence Is The Best Form Of Attack. And Defence. And Everything’ Pulis at the helm.

So who is to blame for this situation?

Zlatan is the obvious target. He’s had more attempts (95) than any other striker this season. A lot more, actually – second placed Diego Costa has managed just 68.

Their respective conversion rates says it all. Costa turns 22.1% of his chances into goals, Ibrahimovic 15.8%. In fact, only five regular strikers have a worse rate than Zlatan’s and they’re all in teams in the bottom half of the table.

Over to you, Jose. Stick the knife in.

“When you speak about Zlatan’s goals you should always add 14 goals and one penalty in 31 matches played in England in all competitions. You should always add that extra item.”

No knifing there. How about the man himself? Will he fall on his sword?

“I know there were many people who said I wouldn’t even score 20 but that is nothing I focus on. I have 20 goals and seven assists.”

Nope. Not a bit of it.

So United aren’t scoring enough and yet nobody’s to blame. To be fair to Zlatan, he’s managed 15 league goals for his huge FPL following.

But as mentioned above, it could be time to sell the Swede – at least in the short term.

Gameweek 26 is already a goner and Gameweek 28 is likely to follow suit unless United can’t find their way past a Blackburn side currently three points from safety in the Championship.

Because while it’s true that a striker has got to be in the right place to miss chances as well as take them, not even Zlatan is good enough to score in a match that’s been postponed.

Although he’d probably tell you otherwise.

919 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. SpaceCadet
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Start phillips or zaha?

    1. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Phillips

    2. sunzip14
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Zaha

    3. SpaceCadet
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      1-1. Tie breaker anyone?

      1. The Head-Ake
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Philly

  2. Pique boo
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Is Costa/Hazard a better captain choice than Sanchez? Arsenal are playing bad and Hull are playing good. While Chelsea look very good and play Burnley who isn't the best team despite their home record.

    1. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Burnley at home won't let Chelsea win easily,has to be sanchez

    2. harvard
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      I've never seen anyone captain a player vs heaton at Burnley stadium and end up happy

      1. McEwan
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 4 hours ago

        I was away to say I did with Aguero in 13 but I didn't! lol. But I still think they shouldn't be totally overlooked. Good differencial this week although there are a lot of good options!

  3. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    This team good enough for GW26/28? 1 hit required:

    GW26 (11 starters):
    Pickford
    Coleman, Brunt, F Mori, Nyom
    Alli, Eriksen, Phillips, Capoue
    Benteke, Carroll

    Bench: Cech, Ibra, Sanchez, Valencia

    GW27: Alli/Eriksen -> Siggy
    GW28: Benteke -> Lukaku

    GW28 (8 starters):
    Coleman, Brunt, F Mori, Nyom
    Siggy, Phillips
    Lukaku, Carroll

    Bench: Cech, Pickford, Valencia, Sanchez, Alli, Capoue, Ibra

    Alternative is to WC in GW26....

    1. Rasping Drive
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      I wouldn't wildcard.

    2. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Looks good

    3. kenzo.
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      would really consider getting lukaku in before

      1. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Given my lack of starters for GW26 I'd have to ditch Ibra or have 1 less starter in GW26 if getting Lukaku in GW26.

  4. Speédy
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Holgate to play???
    Thinking of starting him over brunt and PVA

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Tough to say. Play brunt.

    2. Rasping Drive
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Not sure I would risk a one pointer. (Having said that, you'd probably be relying on attacking points for the other two)

      I would play Brunt.

      1. Speédy
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        I don't see a 1 pointer,either he starts,or he doesn't play,koeman won't need a change of formation mid-game against boro

        1. Rasping Drive
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          You could be right. But he did play 11 mins against Stoke in the game before last.

  5. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Best move here assuming Carroll is passed fit?

    A) Save FT
    B) Sterling (bou) > Siggy (LEI)
    C) Eriksen (liv) -> Theo (HUL) and WC next week

    Cech
    Valencia, Coleman, Stones
    Sanchez, Alli, Eriksen, Sterling
    Ibra, Benteke, Carroll

    Pickford, Nyom, Capoue, Amat
    Bank 0.5m, 1FT

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      A

    2. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Don't save ft if wildcarding next week,Alli to siggy imo

      1. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Yeah, it's A or B if saving WC and C if WCing next week.

        1. Speédy
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          5 blankers with capoue and amat doesn't look good,maybe save ft and take -4 next week

          1. Jinswick
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 6 hours ago

            Yep, I think I'm either:

            1. A and Stones/Amat/Sterling -> Brunt/F Mori/Phillips (-4) next week, or

            2. C

    3. Rasping Drive
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      I like D; but why would you WC the following week?

      1. Rasping Drive
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        I mean C!

        1. Jinswick
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          Because if i do C then I'd only have 7 starters for GW26 and 3 starters for GW28

          1. Rasping Drive
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 6 hours ago

            I thought you said you would have 8 starters in GW28 with only one hit? (above post)

            1. Jinswick
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 6 hours ago

              I would if doing A or B:
              Currently have 3 for GW28 (Nyom, Coleman, Carroll) and would get 5 more with 4FT and 1 hit between now and GW28.

              If doing C I'd still only have 3 starters but with only 3FT between now and GW28 (so max 7 starters come GW28 with the same 1 hit)

              1. Rasping Drive
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                9 years, 5 hours ago

                Yes, but I assume you would be doing C (and captaining him) this week because you think he will get a big haul. Hence, use 4 points of that profit to take another hit to get 8 out for GW28.

                1. Jinswick
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 15 Years
                  9 years, 5 hours ago

                  Not sure I'd go as far as captaining him, but I do think he's a good option this week. With a WC next week I can get 11 decent players in GW26 & GW28 & use FT to get 11DGWers for GW34 and 14DGWers for GW37 without any hits.

                  Versus a poorer 11 in GW26 for a -4 and only 8 in GW28

                  Whatcha reckon?

                  1. Rasping Drive
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 16 Years
                    9 years, 5 hours ago

                    I think in theory it could work, but I think you would have to be very fortunate for none of your squad to have an injury/get dropped in the period between GW28 and GW34, and likewise up until GW37.

                    It seems you are itching to pull the trigger on your WC - so go for it!

                    1. Jinswick
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 15 Years
                      9 years, 5 hours ago

                      You and Pep (see below) make a good point and I think I'm swaying back to saving my WC. Thanks for your comments, very helpful! 🙂

                      1. Rasping Drive
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 16 Years
                        9 years, 5 hours ago

                        You're welcome, Jinswick. Good luck with whatever you decide.

    4. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      I would considering playing WC to be honest... No Luka and Costa can kill next week

      1. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        That's the thing. As well as carrying some poor players id have no Lukaku or any CHE in GW26 unless I WC next week.

      2. Count of Monte Hristo
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        It's not the Swansea that were getting skittled every week, I don't think Costa is hugely important for GW26 in particular.

  6. DeanKush
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Hi guys,

    Thoughts?

    Holebas for Alonso
    Erik for snod

    Need the fees for Alonso transfer

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Do you have any other spurs players?

      1. DeanKush
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Have Alli as well.

        1. Dreams
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          Then maybe do it. But I don't think Snodgrass is a good option. Think of any other player.

          1. DeanKush
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 54 mins ago

            Was thinking Mirallas, but then i have 3 Eve players.

            Any other options? Zaha? I have 6.8 to spend

          2. DeanKush
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 45 mins ago

            Maybe even Moses?

  7. C_G
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Gtg?

    Grant

    Brunt Alonso Valencia

    Sanchez Eriksen Siggy(c) Zaha

    Ibra Rondon Kane(vc)

    Jaku Yoshi Amat Hoj

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Don't captain siggy IMO.

    2. Sonny “The Hitman&rdq…
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      I am captaining Siggy. I think it is a great differential- but I don't have Ibra

  8. Pep says
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Kinda wish I still had my AOA

  9. mcrayeps
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Hi

    Need best 4.1 def that have some minutes to be my 4th sub def
    A) Jack Stephens (Southampton)
    B) Josh Tymon (Hull)
    C) Joleon Lescott (Sunderland)
    D) Donald Love (Sunderland) and my current player

    Thanks 🙂

    1. Clifford☯
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      can you stretch to 4.3 and get Robertson(Hull) ?

      1. mcrayeps
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        no 🙁

        1. Clifford☯
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 5 hours ago

          A

    2. harvard
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Isn't love playing?? Stephens has at least a blank and soton are getting caceres if I read well

  10. kenzo.
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Do we have any idea about whether GW34 or GW 37 will have more matches? If not, by when would we expect to know for sure?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      37 may have more.
      FA Cup results next weekend will be a factor.

      1. kenzo.
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        how will they factor? replays?

        1. Pep says
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          Teams will blank in 35 for the FA Cup semis so depending who makes it that far (most likely Prem teams), the rescheduled 35 fixtures will be in 37 I think?

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 6 hours ago

            34 is for blanks but they have midweek to play.

        2. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          Upsets mean 34 being bigger.

    2. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      They will most likely reschedule the Gw26 and gw28 fixtures together so sometime after gw28 we should know for certain

      1. kenzo.
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        ahh ok cheers.... in case 37 have more matches there could be a decent argument to wildcard early as majority of the teams could have nothing much to play for

        1. Pep says
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 6 hours ago

          I'm thinking of Wildcard in in gw30 or 31. Not sure yet but it's always an option. Get through 28 1st and I'll decide then

          1. mcrayeps
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 6 hours ago

            i hear you pep

            1. Pep says
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 5 hours ago

              I'm excited for the wildcard. Have so many drafts done.. Lol

  11. @Team Shark FC
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    GTG?

    Heaton
    Brunt/Coleman/Baines
    Alli/Siggy/Sanchez/Phillips
    Ibra(C)/Lukaku(VC)/Costa

    Pickford/Capoue/Chamber/Love

    1. karvs155
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Very good to go!

    2. KUNingas
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Yep

  12. Count of Monte Hristo
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Would you (c) Jesus over Zlatan or Sánchez?

    1. karvs155
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      I think so, yeah

  13. karvs155
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Good to go?
    Forster
    Alonso Brunt Pieters Coleman
    Sanchez Alli Sigurdsson Phillips
    Kane Ibra (c)

    Jaku, Stanislas, Anichebe, Holebas

    1. KUNingas
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Yeah

  14. KUNingas
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Play one
    A) Brunt (whu)
    B) Cedric (sun)

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Have the same dilemma. Cedric is looking great and it's the last GW he has a chance of starting before I drop him. Feel like I should give him a run

      1. KUNingas
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Yeah next week im ditching him. Maybe I will give him one more change

    2. karvs155
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Tough, think I would go with A, due to some set pieces.
      But Cedric so attacking as well.
      Coin toss

      1. KUNingas
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 6 hours ago

        Thanks

    3. Clifford☯
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      B

    4. Ephurion
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      I'd go B.
      Brunt has yet to score more than 2 points away from home.

  15. Clifford☯
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Am I Good to go ?

    Mannone
    Alonso Baines Brunt
    Sanchez Eriksen Alli Sigurdsson(c)
    Ibra Costa Rondon

    Heaton Fletcher Amat Daniels

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Rondon is ugly

    2. KUNingas
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Yep

  16. Invincibles
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    Current team:

    Foster
    Alonso mcauley walker
    Zaha Sanchez alli Phillips
    Costa ibra Defoe

    Subs: jak, Davies, yoshi, Ake

    A) Save FT?

    B) Or which move to make?

    1. KUNingas
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      A, wiser next week

    2. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 hours ago

      Ake or Yoshida to Mawson and start? Double figure haul incoming!

  17. Emp
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 6 hours ago

    people who are recommending playing phillips over brunt, I don't get it. They both seem to be on an equal amount of set pieces, brunt can also score from open play and gets an extra point for it and he can potentially keep a clean sheet. Besides wba have very little threat away from home in open play in any case. I'm playing brunt

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Just based on Brent's away form I feel. I've Phillips in there but I wouldn't expect much from either

    2. KipperBRT
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      I'm currently on Philips for the same reasons. However, with WBA defense assets so highly owned, I'll probably switch before deadline. Should probably just play them both!

  18. WE GO FOR IT
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Heaton | Foster
    Walker | Coleman | McAuley | Holebas | Love
    Sanchez | Eriksen | Firmino | Phillips | Zaha
    Ibra | Lukaku | Negredo

    2FT and 0.1Itb
    What to do?
    A. Firmino -> Siggy
    B. FIrmino -> Barkley/Antonio/Snodgrass
    C. Negredo -> Carroll
    D. Firmino -> A and Carroll / B and Benteke
    E. Any other

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Not Benteke, please no!!! Defoe..

      1. WE GO FOR IT
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Can't afford Defoe

    2. Football Weekender
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      A)

      Siggy is the flavour of the month right now.

      1. WE GO FOR IT
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Cheers

    3. WE GO FOR IT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Can't afford Defoe

    4. karvs155
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      D, Siggy Carrol. or just A, since Carrol is a doubt.

  19. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    @Pep

    If WCing next week I'd have 4 DGWers on the bench and then use the 8FT between GW26 & DGW34 to bring in more DGWers. Should be able to get 11 or so by GW34 and a further 3 by GW37

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      In theory yes but you simply can't plan 8 transfers. It's too far away. Injuries, rotations, form.. Too many things can go wrong and you'll end up regretting the WC I feel

      1. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Yeah, this is the risk. That being said, I'd likely only be bringing in nailed on DGWers (Sanchez, Ibra etc) from GW29-34 so I think injuries is the main risk.

        Hmmmm. Maybe saving the WC is the right play...

      2. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Ps, just noticed above you are thinking about a GW30/31 WC - does that not carry a similar risk?

        1. Pep says
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 5 hours ago

          Yes but your going to be trying to get all the big hitters in over a number of weeks. You stand to lose a lot of points in the meantime. WC'ing prior to 28 doesn't give you the option I'm considering. I might WC in 30/31 and if I do, I'll have the transfers to allow me to sort out form and injuries and the like, you won't is what I'm trying to say

          1. Pep says
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 5 hours ago

            I think theres enough time between now and 28 to put a decent team together to get you through gw28. Then consider your options moving forward. Fielding 11 in gw28 will not give you a season defining score. Either the forwards will do well, or the defenders will do well. Either way, the ceiling isn't very high. Having between 6 and 9 players in gw28 is the most efficient way of maximizing your score and allowing you to keep your wildcard. Just my view, I know everybody is different

            1. Rasping Drive
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              9 years, 5 hours ago

              I am thinking along similar lines - I do think the optimum time to pull the trigger will be GW32 when City's tough run of fixtures will be over.

              It will probably mean not being able to have both a Pool mid (for BOU in GW31) and Sanchez (for WHM in the same gameweek); and perhaps foregoing Defoe in GW29-31 (BUR wat lei) but you can't have everything.

          2. Jinswick
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 5 hours ago

            Fair point that, cheers.

            You see any better moves that this with my current squad? This assumes no FA cup upsets.

            GW25: Save
            GW26: Amat, Stones & Sterling -> Brunt, F Mori & Phillips (-4)
            GW27: Alli/Eriksen -> Siggy
            GW28: Benteke -> Lukaku

            Gives me 11 in GW26 & 8 in GW28 for 1 hit. Would then WC for the DGWs.

            Cech
            Coleman, Valencia, Stones
            Sanchez, Eriksen, Alli, Sterling
            Ibra, Benteke, Carroll

            Pickford, Nyom, Capoue, Amat
            Bank 0.5m, 1FT

            1. Pep says
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 5 hours ago

              Ya Gw26 transfers looks spot on. Brunt and Phillips have 2 great home game. GTG I think, hopefully Carroll stays fit..

              1. Jinswick
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 15 Years
                9 years, 5 hours ago

                Cheers buddy, much appreciated. You and rasping drive have made me see sense! 🙂

  20. harvard
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Play chambers vs Everton home or PVA vs Stoke away

    1. The Overthinker
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Pva

  21. The Overthinker
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Brunt or stanislas?
    Whom to start?

    1. harvard
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Brunt. Stanislas isn't an assured starter

    2. WE GO FOR IT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Brunt

  22. The Overthinker
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Need some suggestions
    Jaku
    Azpi-brunt-coleman-pieters-alonso-brunt
    Sanchez-alli
    Costa-ibra-defoe(C)

    Bench - heaton, Phillips stanislas,Tarrol

    A) play Phillips over brunt
    B) play stanislas over brunt
    C) gtg

  23. brianj
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    No love for Defoe?

    1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      So, so, so tempting for (C) but not at the stage to make any captain punts.

  24. SpaceCadet
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Any injury updates on Charlie D?

  25. GE
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    GW26:

    1) or 2) please? 🙂

    1) Ibra -> Costa
    2) Ibra --> Lukaku

    Have Coleman, Baines and Hazard.

    1. harvard
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Wait till after this weekend games to decide

      1. GE
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Of course 🙂 1) or 2)?

    2. WE GO FOR IT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      I'd keep Ibra. But if you must do one, then Lukaku as he has no blanks.

    3. Football Weekender
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      2)

      You'll need all three of the Everton contingent for GW28

      1. Football Weekender
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Only after this week though. Don't sell Ibra before Watford.

        1. GE
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 5 hours ago

          I will do it after 🙂

    4. sumatera
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      2 after this GW

  26. harvard
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Is
    Alli, PVA to siggy, Alonso (-4) worth it?

  27. Cocky Spaniel Alves
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Morning all.

    Having a really rough season.

    Would appreciate any good ideas what to do this week? Got 1 free transfer and 1m in the bank.

    Pickford Foster
    Alonso Rose Coleman Lovren Pieters
    Sanchez Lallana Pedro Phillips Carrick
    Ibra Kane Carroll

    That midfield... :/

    1. BooYaKasha
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Switch Lallana to Siggy
      Downgrade Rose to Maguire
      And upgrade pedro to Hazard
      I think it's worth a -8

  28. Pep says
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Lallana to Siggy seems pretty simple

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      @cockyspaniel

    2. Cocky Spaniel Alves
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Yeah, that is the obvious move I think. Rose is obviously injured though.

      Still annoyed that I sold Siggy about a monht ago.

      1. Pep says
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        I sold him too, worst transfer of the season hands down!

  29. brianj
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    Suggestions?

    Heaton
    Azpi Valencia McAuley
    Alli Antonio Sanchez Phillips Pedro
    Costa Defoe

    Subs:
    Jaku Crouch Amat Holgate

    2 FT
    0.4 ITB

    1. 404_FC
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      alli to siggy

      and play crouch > philips

    2. sumatera
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      you need a defender for next week - valencia to Alonso maybe

      1. brianj
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        Already have 3 Chelsea players

  30. 404_FC
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 5 hours ago

    already own alonso

    so for long term which choice u pick ?

    a) cahill or luiz (play double che def)
    b) walker

    1. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 5 hours ago

      Prefer Walker I think, although double Chelsea defence is very appealing. Think spreading the risk is best though so Walker I would choose

      1. 404_FC
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 5 hours ago

        thx pep