188 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Better Call Raul
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Is this defence too risky? Want to save WC and can get to it by doing Porro -> Lewis

    TAA-Gabriel-Lewis-Greaves-Coady

    Would mean Lewis and Greaves share the 3rd slot as I plan to start Trent and Gabby every week.

    Am I better off going for someone more nailed than Lewis for 4.7m?

    1. vova
      • 15 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      I don't hate it but I'm cautious regarding Lewis. Feels like a bit of a trap.

      His main appeal is that he is a way into the City defence at 4.7.

      However, his minutes aren't guaranteed (rotation/subs) with games starting to pick up. I also don't see Lewis as someone with attacking upside.

    2. bialk
      • 16 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Not Lewis.

    3. Weasel Boy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Lewis played last night.

      Too much of a risk generally

    4. tassman
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Just play Lewis, he might miss the odd game but you'll get a lot of starts out of him. People dwell on players minutes too much, fearmongering, or being overly cautious. You have to take gambles to do well in the game, and a lot of the time when people put doubts in your mind about a player it doesn't turn out the way they claim. I think he's a great pick and realistically most City defenders will get rotated. With no Rodri, Lewis will automatically get more minutes, just from that situation alone. Don't let other people's fears influence your decisions, go with you own instinct.

  2. ran
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    ESR Rogers Salah Jota Eze
    Pedro Haaland Wood

    1) Jota + Eze > McNeil & Saka
    2) Jota + Eze > Semenyo & Saka
    3) Jota + Pedro > McNeil & Havertz
    4) Jota + Pedro > Semenyo & Havertz

    Go for which?

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      4

  3. sirmorbach
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    A. Robinson, Diaz, Jimenez
    B. Saliba, ESR, DCL

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      A

      1. Geriatric Unathletic
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        B

        1. Geriatric Unathletic
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          1 year, 2 months ago

          Saliba = Solid defense (clean sheets) for a long term hold. Robinson + no clean sheets but 2 x attacking returns. However clean sheets are the bedrock of a defence pick.
          ESR. = 8th highest scoring mid for £2 mill less than Diaz.Of course keep Diaz if don't need the funds elsewhere.
          DCL = Great fixtures for the foreseeable and can be downgraded IF is a trap. Jimenez = Just no from me.

  4. 360_No_Pope
    • 1 Year
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Have A, worth switching ESR to DCL or downgrading Robbo to get Solanke?

    A) Robbo/ESR
    B) Robbo/DCL
    C) 4.6/Solanke

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Nope hold

      1. Geriatric Unathletic
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        Stick with A...

  5. BusbySwede
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Have 4 FT and thinking about doing Salah, TAA, Pedro, ESR to Gabriel, Mbuemo, McNeil and Wood. And for gw7 doing Watkins -> Haaland.
    Good or stupid plan?

    Having both of TAA would be great, but dont really see how i can make that work..

    Squad as now:
    Flekken (Ramsdale)
    TAA, Robinson, Konsa, (Milenkovic, Faes)
    Salah, Saka, Palmer, ESR, Rogers
    Havertz, Watkins, Pedro

    1. ran
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Pedro to Wood will do.

    2. gergin
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      I am trying to add Haaland for gw7 too, but doing my best to keep Watkins...now 8 ITB 🙂

  6. Bumbaclot
    • 15 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Hi all

    Salah Mitoma and Watkins out for Haaland Diaz and Adama for free?

    Front 8 would be

    Diaz/palmer/saka/rogers/adama
    Haaland/havertz/pedro

    Thanks 🙂

  7. Randaxus
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    I am seeing people saying with Bruno that the team does not effect XA, the conversion rate of the player you are passing to has a giant effect on XA, if Bruno had the same XA passing to Haaland he would have way more goals that is a fact.

    1. Runnerboy31
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Agreed - although you actually realising XA is greatly affected rather than XA itself. Bruno is an interesting one - everyone seems to have a strong view and I think the truth is boringly in the middle of two extreme views.

  8. sirmorbach
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Minor question of course, but is Van den Berg a better 4;0 option that Harwood-Bellis? I'd rather have a Brentford defender, but not sure about his mins long term. Any thoughts?

    1. MARVELLUS
      • 16 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Depends on your appetite for risk, I imagine your 5th def will almost never play anyway, but there is a chance that VDB won't play anyway if a back 4. Wish I had that info for my WC as would def have him in. Currently got Greaves. If THB is going to get 2 max anyway maybe go for it.

      1. sirmorbach
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        Cheers, mate

    2. rdpx
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      I wouldn't use a transfer on it

    3. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      VBD has played more games as rb then cb, people automatically think when Brentford play 4 VBD loses out but there is chance he gets minutes at RB.
      Plus take into consideration they paid a lot of money for him. I would go VDB if I was using my wc

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        145 games CB and 25 games RB according to Transfermarkt

        https://www.transfermarkt.us/sepp-van-den-berg/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/541231

    4. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Yes

    5. Runnerboy31
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Bednerak over H-B for certainty of minutes. I think Greaves / Faes are better than VDB. Assuming they are 3rd sub, literally certainty of playing is the key factor over actual return likelihood.

      I don’t like VDB as a pick tbh. If Wildcarding you should have a solid first 11 for the next few. So by the time your third sub might become relevant Brentford’s fixture would’ve turned sour even if he plays. Brentford having good fixtures right now is mostly irrelavant. It more fixtures in 5-10 weeks that matter.

  9. Bennyboy1907
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Last 2 spots on WC 14.4 to spend :
    A)
    Eze
    Solanke

    B)
    Diaz/Bruno
    DCL/Wood

    1. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Out of all those names Diaz would be my preferred choice so B with Wood

    2. Tanaka'd
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Diaz Wood

  10. mcflyjohn
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    A)

    Flekken (Henderson)
    Konate I Gabriel I Dalot (Graves I Faes)
    Saka I ESR I Diaz I Mbeumo (Rogers)
    Haaland I DCL I Watkins

    B)

    Flekken (Fab)
    Gabriel I Robbo I Martinez (Graves I Faes)
    Saka I Salah I ESR I Mbeumo I Rogers)
    DCL I Haaland (Stewart)

    1. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      I prefer A, but unless you are planning BB in the next few weeks, I would not tie up funds in backup keeper and 8th attacker. Would downgrade Hendo and one of Rogers, ESR, or DCL (probably one of the mids) and use funds to upgrade Konate, etc.

  11. Old Wulfrunian
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Dcl or Solanke?Can't decide.Any thoughts?

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Solanke - plays for a better team with more attacking potential

      1. Old Wulfrunian
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        cheers Miguel.Money is the thing i guess.

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Depends what you can do with the 1.5m difference

      1. Old Wulfrunian
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        I can get a 7.5 midfielder.

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 6 Years
          1 year, 2 months ago

          That spot needs to be factored in the comparison

  12. jack88
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Watkins +maddison
    Or
    Solanke + diaz

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      SD

    2. JBG
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      SDD

    3. Wayne Enterprises
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      S & D

  13. Johnny too hotty
    • 14 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    THoughts on my WC, please also share yours below?

    Sanchez Fab

    Trent Gabriel Lewis KOnsa Robinson

    Saka Palmer Dias ESR Winks

    Haaland DCL STewart

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Not a fan of the 442 setup and 7/8th attackers are Winks and Stewart. You aren't taking advantage of the upside of those attackers spots

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Agree with Tony's feedback - the 442 structure looks like a substantial drawback to crowbarring Saka/Palmer/Haaland/TAA.

      Still tinkering with mine & not entirely satisfied but might be interesting as a different way of spreading funds, with a few rotation options (ESR/Semenyo & the 4.5 defenders) and strong bench. Currently:

      Onana 4m
      Gabriel Konate Milenkovic Davis Van den Berg
      Saka Diaz Mbeumo Semenyo Smith-Rowe
      Haaland Havertz Solanke

      1. Johnny too hotty
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        good point........hows my take 2?

        Raya Fab

        Trent Gabriel Konsa Robinson Milenkovic

        Saka Dias ESR Mbeumo Winks

        Haaland DCL Solanke

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 6 Years
          1 year, 2 months ago

          Drop 1*4.5m def and upgrade winks to Rogers if you have the funds

        2. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          1 year, 2 months ago

          Looks a much better balance. Tony's suggested tweak would allow cover for DCL or rotation for e.g. ESR v City

  14. Atimis
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    I'm tired with tinkering, it's not possible to put together something you would call an ideal team, it's mostly about luck

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      It happens, especially in a WC week. Take a break & come back to it tomorrow / Friday

      1. Atimis
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        Right!

    2. Whazza
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Pff, only about luck if it goes badly 😉

  15. Wayne Enterprises
    • 13 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    WC draft?

    Flekken Valdi

    TAA Gabriel Mazraoui Mykolenko Greaves

    Diaz Saka Mbeumo Barnes Winks

    Haaland Watkins Jimenez

    £0 ITB

    1. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Decent. Jimenez a bit of a question mark, but might do well enough for the price.

  16. vova
    • 15 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    Is Alex Moreno expected to be first choice? That 0.1 would come in VERY handy for me

    1. Whazza
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Would assume so, if he wanted to sit on the bench he could have stayed at Villa

  17. Stonecoldsagar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    1 year, 2 months ago

    1M ITB, on a WC
    Raya, Fab
    Konate, Konsa, Greaves, Faes, VDB
    Salah, Saka, Mbeumo, Rogers, Dibling
    Haaland, Jackson, Wood

    Do I switch
    A) Jackson, VDB > Havertz, 4.5M Def?
    B) Wood, Dibling > Semenyo, Jimenez
    C) Leave Attack as is and upgrade VDB > 4.5M Def

    1. Whazza
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 2 months ago

      Are both options in A supposed to be more costly?

      1. Stonecoldsagar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 2 Years
        1 year, 2 months ago

        Yep, 0.5 more for Jackson to Havertz and 0.5 for VBD to a 4.5 def.

        1. Whazza
          • 13 Years
          1 year, 2 months ago

          Definitely not three 4M defenders, that's asking for trouble. Upgrade VDB. Jackson I think I prefer now that Havertz might play deeper with Jesus back.

  18. HaalandHaaland
    • 1 Year
    1 year, 2 months ago

    A) Saka + Wood
    B) Maddison + Havertz + 0.5 itb

    Any thoughts?