634x258 Scout Notes
27 July 2015 1939 comments
Paul Paul
Share:

Romelu Lukaku bags a hat-trick as Everton breeze past Hearts. Theo Walcott boosts his Fantasy stock as he snatches Arsenal’s winner against Wolfsburg, Newcastle new boy Georginio Wijnaldum nets again, whilst Palace taste defeat at the hands of Sporting Lisbon. Here are the notes from Sunday’s pre-season encounters…

Arsenal 1 Wolfsburg 0

Arsene Wenger made ten changes to the XI that swept aside Lyon 6-0 on Saturday, with only Mesut Ozil retaining his place. This saw Petr Cech handed his home debut between the posts, with a back-four of Hector Bellerin, Gabriel, Calum Chambers and Nacho Monreal. Mikel Arteta and Santi Cazorla were stationed in the double-pivot, whilst Jack Wilshere, Ozil and Jeff Reine-Adelaide tucked in behind lone frontman, Theo Walcott.

Reine-Adelaide supplied the pass for the only goal of the match, as Walcott strengthened his claim for a central berth by slotting home just five minutes after the break. Wenger made five alterations over the course of the second period, with the likes of Aaron Ramsey, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Olivier Giroud afforded further minutes off the bench.

Post-match, the Gunners boss had plenty to say over Walcott’s performance in an interview with the club’s official website:

“Another goal for Theo and I’m not surprised by that because I played him through the middle. I’ve always said that he’s a goalscorer because he has the movement, he has the timing of the run, the speed for the finishing, and he has an eye for taking his chances at the right moments. When he gets into these positions he finishes well. Yesterday he nearly scored when he came on as a substitute, today he scored. I believe that Theo will score goals. In his ideal world he would like to play with a strong guy next to him, a player who is very strong physically, and he play off him. We have so many offensive players which makes that very difficult to combine all of them together.”

Wenger’s line-up for the Community Shield on Sunday will clearly give us the clearest indication on his thinking ahead of the season opener against West Ham. Walcott appears to be in the driving seat to claim the striker’s role, leaving Olivier Giroud potentially frozen out to the bench in a repeat of Arsenal’s previous Wembley appearance for the FA Cup final. While Mesut Ozil and Santi Cazorla remain clear early midfield targets in the light of Alexis Sanchez’s expected Gameweek 1 absence, Walcott has emerged as potentially the most explosive option. He has currently claimed 7.8 ownership in the Fantasy Premier League (FPL).

Hearts 1 Everton 3

A Romelu Lukaku hat-trick steered Everton to victory at Tynecastle as the muscular Belgian showed poise from the spot to convert two penalties. Gareth Barry was fouled in the box to allow Lukaku to strike home his first goal, while Seamus Coleman’s assist then set up the striker for his second to hand Everton the lead. Kevin Mirallas was then brought down to allow his compatriot to complete his hat-trick.

Significantly, the 3-1 victory marked the first pre-season appearance for Leighton Baines – confirming the fact that Lukaku is now ahead of the left-back in the pecking order for spot kicks.

Baines took his place in a first-choice back four that was made up of Coleman, John Stones and Phil Jagielka playing in front of Joel Robles in goal. Roberto Martinez deployed his side in an attacking 4-3-3, anchoring the midfield with Barry, James McCarthy and Leon Osman. An attacking trio of Lukaku and Mirallas, flanking Arouna Kone through the middle, provided the threat.

The likes of Tom Cleverley and Ross Barkley were reduced to appearances from the bench. Bryan Oviedo was also amongst one of the subs introduced in the second period as he made his belated return from injury.

It remains to be seen if Martinez maintains the new attacking 4-3-3 setup, although post-match the Everton boss was clearly enthused by his side’s display…

“Going forward we looked a threat, but then we always kept a good balance and only a lapse in concentration early saw us concede from a dead ball situation. Apart from that I thought we kept our defensive duties to a good level.”

Sporting Lisbon 2 Crystal Palace 0

The Eagles ended the inaugural Cape Town Cup with a 2-0 reverse at the hands of Sporting Lisbon. Alan Pardew again kept faith with the 4-2-3-1 setup but shuffled his pack following the 4-0 win over Supersport United two days ago.

Alex McCarthy made his Palace debut in goal following his move from QPR; he played behind a back four made up of Joel Ward, Scott Dann, Damien Delaney and Pape Souare. James McArthur and Johan Cabaye were deployed in the double pivot, with Jason Puncheon, Jordan Mutch and Dwight Gayle in the attacking three, supporting Glenn Murray up front.

Pardew was again without Yannick Bolasie through injury, while Marouane Chamakh was also absent and Wilfried Zaha was limited to a cameo role from the bench following a recent knock. Post-match, the Palace boss bemoaned the lack of creativity from wide areas…

“We lacked a little bit of width today – Zaha hasn’t been fit and only trained for one day this pre-season so that was his first 10 minutes of action and Bolasie was injured in training on Thursday and it’s a shame he wasn’t involved because we probably missed a little bit of his x-factor.”

This would suggest that we’ll see a different attacking three take to the field against Fulham on Saturday, in a line-up that is most likely to reflect the teamsheet at Norwich on the opening day.

Sheffield United 2 Newcastle 2

Steve McClaren continued with a 4-2-3-1 formation for the trip to Bramall Lane. A back-four of Daryl Janmaat, Mike Williamson, Steven Taylor and Massadio Haidara sat in front of Tim Krul, with Jack Colback and Vurnon Anita stationed in the double-pivot. Further up the field, Moussa Sissoko, Georginio Wijnaldum and Ayoze Perez took up the attacking midfield spots behind Papiss Cisse, with new signing Aleksandar Mitrovic yet to be involved.

Wijnaldum (7.0 in FPL) netted his second goal in as many appearances for the Magpies, courtesy of a Papiss Cisse pass, before Siem de Jong – one of seven second-half substitutes – notched his side’s second after slotting home a flick-on from a Colback corner. Although Steven Taylor (4.0 in FPL) started at centre-half again, McClaren is clearly determined to strengthen at the back – the Magpies have agreed a deal for Anderlecht centre-half Chancel Mbemba, with the FA expected to confirm the transfer on Thursday.

The Newcastle boss also played down rumours of a move away for Fabricio Coloccini. The Argentine has yet to play a part in pre-season due to injury and has been linked with a move to Palace but McClaren is clearly keen to keep him:

“We want him playing. He has got a little niggle, which he has every season and that has to be taken care of. He is working on conditioning. In America he was out most of the time because of the surface in the last game. We are still working and have time. He needs to have a good week and needs to play Saturday. We need him in the team. I have come in and they have told me to assess the squad. Colo has come in and I have been delighted with his attitude and the way he is around the place. That’s great – but we need him on the field. I looked at Coloccini in training and he’s one of our best players. I know things were difficult last season but I want him out on the field in a Newcastle shirt. He’s great for the team.”

After the match, new signing Wijnaldum admitted he’s still suffering from jet lag after arriving late to the club’s tour of the US before returning to the UK just a few days later:

“It is always hard to play after a flight of 10 hours but what is harder is that a lot of players still live in the time that they have in America, so most of the time I wake up at four o’clock and I can’t sleep any more – today I had the same problem. I am always pleased to score goals and always happy if I make goals. I’m always looking for that one chance and today I had that one chance, when you get it you must be ready.”

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

  1. Hazardous to go without
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    Hazardous to go without

    Looking at my own and others RMTs a key issue is emerging - do you go with or without Hazard. I've tried tinkering around with a team without Hazard and it looks far better than my one with him. Even with the almost as expensive Costa as Chelsea coverage teams look better without Hazard I think. But despite Chelsea's tough fixtures and Hazard being best against weaker sides I still can't shift the midfielder from my side.

    Fear is the key consideration. His whopping 54% ownership means that a Hazardless team is one penalty and bonus away from a potentially poor week - especially if a large chunk of that 54% captain him.

    My heart says Hazardless, my head says Hazard. But which is right? And which are you going for - a Hazardless team or one with the Belgian taking centre stage in your side?

    1. Az
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Exactly the situation i'm in. I just downgraded Haz to Fab and it let me upgrade my defence, Ritchie, and Ramsey to Walcott.

      But, I just don't feel comfortable not owning him. That first game against Swansea, he has potential to really explode, then rather than just reshaping my team to get Aguero, i'm then struggling to get Hazard in as well - which probably means an early wildcard.

      I think the best bet is play it safe and start with Haz, unless we find out Aguero is fit to start, then we can think about downgrading Haz if we create a route for getting him in if he does deliver.

      1. Lakers
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I agree. Play safe and start with Haz. Just imagine how you'll feel after Haz scores from penalty after 20mins of play in gw1....

      2. Kane Toads
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Hi AZ - you are right. The point you made about having to get Haz in as well as Aguero would be a difficult task. I've got Haz from day 1. That's one issue I don't need to deal with after GW1.

      3. Bobbydhino - ⚒ Saint Slav…
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Its for that exact reason, close to 2 million people are going to captain him gw1, and its that opportunity to start ahead of that many people that makes me not have him in my team. Its gw1 the perfect time to take a risk.
        As for getting him in...take a hit. Many overall champions have taken a hit and still finished on top.

      4. Too Mane Men
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Its a risk that can be easily avoided and a precaution which can be easily fixed with a FT, not least of all because he frees up 11.5 to work with; a handy advantage over others who can't free up those kind of funds after the season starts. We can essentially make a more educated decision on who is best to use his funds on whilst pre-season non Hazard owners are trying to make that decision now.

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      As you say, it is about the biggest decision to make. I am going without just to have better points cover across the players. As you say, a very dangerous move though.

    3. Royal5
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Currently going with Fabregas. My therory is that the player I combine with with will get more points than the player I can get alongside Haz.

      1. Royal5
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        *Combine with Fab

    4. Mauro Boselli
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I can't see any reason not to have him.

    5. Dr Joness
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'll personally be going for Fabregas for the first few game weeks. Mainly because of his explosive starts, and against Man City he might get deployed further up the pitch with Mikel/Ramires and Matic holding. And like you say, Hazard is better against weaker teams, and the first 8 or so games are against mainly strong opponents

    6. The Gambler.
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I feel you have to go with him, but I felt that last season when a much higher percentage went with Fabs.

      Prob cost me a top 10 finish.

    7. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      HAZARD!

    8. The Train Driver
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Had one draft with Hazard, hated it. Hazardless since then... It has been either Fab or Costa to replace him...

      1. Louis99
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Or both

        1. The Train Driver
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          With those fixtures and much better Southampton/ManU/Arsenal option, doubling up on Chelsea attack doesn't seem to be the smart thing to do.

          1. Lakers
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            This is why I think choosing only Haz is the best way. Safe captain pick for gw1 and Haz will get you stead points going forward even against harder teams while Costa can't give you the same guarantee (I feel).

    9. QGOONER
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Don't be afraid to go against the crowd. I'm going Hazardless and playing Costa. The point of FPL is to score goals and I'd rather go .5 cheaper for someone who's sole purpose is to do just that.

    10. Bubz
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I have swung back and forth, but will inevitably have him in my team.

    11. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I am banking on Benteke and Wilson to perform...........my attack line is currently
      Hazard Walcott Ozil Mane Anya
      Rooney Benteke Wilson

      1. fantasyfanatic2016
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Virtually the same except I've got Depay instead of Mane. Who's your defence?

    12. SUAREZ_MESSI_COUTINHO
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hazardless for me. Fabregas had more points than him after 5,10 and 15 GWs. More points + decreased difference in price . Hazard is primarily close to essential status when and if Chelsea play striker less later in the season looking for 1-0s or 2-0s.
      Its his overall points tally that influences people, but FPL depends on who you own and when.

    13. ManofKent
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      The difference between Hazard and Fabregas can create an extra premium mid

    14. Del Griffith
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Costa is the expendable one from the Chelsea attack. Personally I'm starting with Hazard & Fabregas and plan to ditch either Fabregas or Cazorla GW4 to fund Rooney to Kun. Going without Hazard at the start is far to risky

    15. Matt
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I've been playing with this one, and I think that ultimately it comes down to the fact that I can get a much better midfielder (Sterling, Ozil, Walcott, Ozil, Cazorla etc.) with Costa than the striker (8.5 or below) I get with Hazard.
      For me, I think I'll start with Costa and then see if it's necessary in an early WC to switch and get Hazard, as his price probably won't rise that much in the first few GW's due to high ownership.

      1. Matt
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Forgot that Fabregas is also a suitable alternative I'm more than happy having as well

      2. Sushant
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Well my mid+fw seems pretty good with Haz i guess!?

        Hazard Ozil Sterling Mane Ritchie

        Benteke Deeney Rooney

    16. Valar(Keith)
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'd decided to go Hazardless and get Fabs instead since the fixtures were tricky.. However, with Aguero not back in training and Sanchez out for a few weeks there's no place to spend my money really. So Hazard IN it is.. Him/Rooney/Wally/Benteke offer me my captain choices for the first few weeks

    17. Shifty
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      If I go without Hazard, I would double up on Chelsea attack with Fabregas + Costa. Would lose attacking coverage spot of another team...But I think Costa is more captainable than Hazard.

    18. Ziro Becomes One
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I am going without for GW1 and will be behind the sofa behind the curtain behind the wall.

    19. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hazard's ownership is more than 55 percent because many noobs have auto complete teams which does not have Hazard........

    20. Rossonero
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm going without and will get Fab instead. Main reason is that beside 1st GW there is not any more weeks early on where everyone will be capping him (GW 4 when he have Palace at home Man City have Watford so i thing Aguero will be obvious cao there). Difference of 2.5 mil betwen Haz and Fab is imo to much, and it could be used to improve 2-3 players acros your team.

      Ofcourse there is a possibility that Haz explodes GW1 but still i wouldnt get him with City and WBA away game in next two. Will get him at some point, probably when i WC

    21. Del Griffiths
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      He's probably the best player in the league, in the best team in the league. It's Costa and his classic 'goal + YC = 5 points' I'm happy without. I think even if you start with not having Hazard in, you'll end up putting him in.

    22. turboLuck
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hazardless here. Uneasy about it though.

    23. Exdeo
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I will start with Fabregas, no doubts, my headache is in other players, like Mane or Pelle, picking up Arsenal big hitters, etc...

    24. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I don't understand why ownership is so important in GW1 Jonty. I think its more important to have a strong side and if Hazard weakens it then thats not good.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        All about rank in those early weeks...but yes the key consideration is whether Hazard will do well or not.

        1. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          I think you can significantly limit any losses with Fabregas or Costa instead.

      2. Patch
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I agree we should ignore ownership. On the one hand high ownership means lower OR risk, but on the other it could mean an almighty impending price drop. OR risk becomes more important as the season wears on.

    25. M Heaney
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I start with Agrero Hazard & Walcott,then fill in the rest.

    26. BRONALDINHO
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Just imagine he blanks in the first 3 or 4 games. You should be able to buy him then at 0.2-0.3 cheaper if lots of people panic and jump ship. Here's to hoping 😀

    27. The Real Big Vern
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      as we all know, Fabs tends to perform historically really well first half of season, on that basis he starts in my team over Haz

    28. t4thomas
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I will probably play it safe to start, but he is certainly on the OUT watchlist.

    29. Ruth_NZ
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      For me this is dead easy. There are 5 or 6 players that FPL has (deliberately I think) priced protectively. Hazard, Sanchez, Aguero, Costa, Silva. Possibly you could add Rooney to that list as well.

      You cannot have them all and none of them will represent good value unless you use them as a captaincy option. You can have maximum three without unbalancing your squad. Take your pick.

      Aguero is probably going to be one for most people. Costa or Hazard but not both. Sanchez or Rooney but not both. Maybe two of those, possibly three at a stretch. You can't have them all.

      Hazard was the one player that remained in my squad for 38 weeks last season. This season I am planning to leave him out. Doesn't concern me at all.

      1. Patch
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah, I'm thinking heavy hitters are only worth having if you are going to be captaining them. So, in fact, I am thinking of having only two of that elite class. Otherwise you end up with rubbish everywhere else.

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Yes. That's my plan too. With the two I have in mind I will have a captain option I am entirely happy with every week.

    30. Lil Uzi Havertz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I just can't see him getting sub 200 points this season, and as a captain option he's (in my subjective opinion) preferable to Fabregas

    31. Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm gonna start without and see how it goes.
      If you look at his PPG last season vs his cost, he is average value, but then there are those captain points.

      But I see other options that will likely do better, so I am going with my head.

    32. Patch
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm wrestling with it. 11.5m doesn't seem that much compared to previous Ronaldo or Lampard prices, but it's relative prices that matter and with prices being a bit lower across the board this season, it seems a high price. Particularly with all those lovely 8.5 options. Instead of Hazard and a 5.5m, you can get two crackers at 8.5m.

      Problem is, with Aguero out initially, Hazard is probably the best captain choice and when you're buying someone who'll be captain a lot, price almost becomes no object.

    33. Adds04
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      As for all choices about a more expensive player, it's a lot easier to downgrade then upgrade

    34. Caine & Co.
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      you'll never win this game if you have fear. gotta go with the gut, it's the only way

    35. Forza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      He has been in my team since day one. He is expensive but the almost guaranteed consistency is so valuable in FPL.

    36. DrChaos
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I've been having Fab instead of Haz since my first draft until I saw how Young played for United against Barca. He's probably the second name on the team sheet after Rooney so I switched from Fab & Mata to Haz & Young. The rest of my team still looks balanced with options to trade for Kun in GW4. I've now got captain rotations between Haz and Rooney until Kun comes in now so personally I think that'll be better.

    37. Nickofoz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'll go with Hazard. Why?

      Firstly, I've created a team with him and am quite happy with it.
      Secondly, I genuinly think he'll outperform Fabregas enough to justify the extra 2.5m, and also when considering captaincy he is well worth the extra.
      Thirdly, as you say he is only a penalty away from a double digit score and I personally think Chelsea will get more penalties next season compared to last. There is a recent hot topic on this.
      Finally, when considering captaincy alone Hazard is well worth it. With Aguero and Sanchez missing for the first 1 or 2 weeks, I don't wanna rely on Rooney as a captaincy option.

    38. GENERATION X
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      WC timing will be key to this sort of Haz v Fab decision. If you are planning a quick WC it makes it easier to put Fab in.

      If Haz was off pens it would make it easier to leave him out - but one stroke of that foot and its likely 8 points just like that.

    39. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm going without - don't plan on captaining him in any of the first 4-5 GWs so I'm happy to spread the funds elsewhere in my team. Ownership is not a good enough reason IMO.

    40. Sconeaus - The Dude Abides
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Big dilemma tough call!

      At min I have

      Butland ruddy
      ivanovic mertesacker/lrscott huth Richards yoshida

      Fabregas, Walcott, Milner, Silva (wanyama)
      Rooney Kane/Costa deeney/Wilson

      With hazard looked lot less good, but catch 22 if does well could fall way behind

    41. The Non Flying Dutchman
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No Hazard but I do have Rooney, Giroud, Walcott, Sterling, Erikson.

      If Chelsea had better fixtures I would have him in + how will managers cope with having him and Aguero. The teams I have drafted with both are materially weaker so I think many will downgrade Hazard in GW3.

      I say as long as you have one after GW3 I don't think it is a big risk.

    42. tm245
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I think the Hazard decision is a tough one, but not because of ownership. He is a great player but has only one comparable player at his potential in terms of both price and potential, Sanchez. Ultimately, I would rather have Fabregas and Sanchez than an Arsenal mid and Hazard, I think.

      Even so, I am surprised at the ownership line of reasoning before the game has even started, since much of the richness of the Smartypants/fpldiscovery site and its statistics about TSB% comes not from predicting future performance but rather from explaining what the top 10k has done in the recent past.

      Without a benchmark for what a good team is, who cares what others are doing? IMO, if you are playing the game from the beginning not to lose or fall behind, you are more likely preventing yourself from winning, whatever your goals may be.

    43. OShaughnessy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm happy to go without Hazard for the first few GW's due to CHE's sched...

      Season long he'll outscore most but, there's better value to be found early in the top price brackets.

    44. Red Wasabi
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      After reading some of the comments I felt that you can make a strong argument for both Hazard / Hazard-Less teams. Therefore, I think there is not a clear-cut right answer, it depends on who you talk to.

      Either way, I believe you should choose whichever team does not disrupt your overall team chemistry and can adapt to various scenarios that change from one game week to the another.

      The true question should be, will you have Hazard from Game week 1? Because, at some point during the season I can everybody owning Hazard at least once.

    45. joker7
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I saw a comment during the end of last season when I was at work, showed Fabregas first 15 games for the last six seasons and then the stats for the last 15 games.

      Its like night and day,,,Fab really does start well and then fades as the season comes to an end.

    46. christiaanbarns
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Great point Jonty, but as you rightly point out it's too dangerous to leave him out. I feel he will only get better, there is a very good chance that he will hit the trajectory of CR - maybe not so dramatic in terms of goal tallies... but sooner rather than later he will hit the 20 goal mark..

      I also feel that the topic of Sterling is more important and could be a key player for the season. With Bony and Kun out for the opening stages of the season. Jovetic on his way out and Dzeko not being favored at all. I think Sterling will play through the middle, and with the likes of Yaya and Silva behind him he can and will run riot

    47. Too Mane Men
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      The main issue for me is his start last season. He had a decent ownership, but nothing like the dizzying highs of 54%. Pretty sure he didn't return any kind of haul for the first few games, then scored, then was most transferred in that week but didn't return for the next 3-4 GWs so slowly got transferred out again. I got him in week 5 and had to wait about 3-4 GWs for any returns. Good job I held on to him of course but the key is he didn't kick on until around GW 8, 9 or 10 mark. Not sure if this was down to tricky fixtures, problems off the field, his poor away form at the start of last season or just plain bad luck.

      Either way I'll be getting him on a just in case basis. Like Jonty says, how on earth would you cope if he slowly accumulated decent points across the first 5-6 weeks or hauled in jackpot in any of the first 3 weeks. Its a risk that can be easily avoided and a precaution which can be easily fixed with a FT, not least of all because he frees up 11.5 to work with; a handy advantage over others who can't free up those kind of funds. We can essentially make a more educated decision on who is best to use his funds for whilst pre-season non Hazard owners are trying to make that decision now.

      My other issue is I never had Costa once last season but suffered minimally due to decent GWs without him when he returned big scores, a feat I am very proud of. Is he a MUST if Haz and Fab are not returning at the start of the season? Probably.
      Costa may be a beast but he has very ugly lack of respect when he's on the pitch, one of many things which make me mad about the state of football today. No excuse for players to behave so poorly when you see the sportsmanship of rugby, cricket, tennis and athletics who, for the most part, have plenty of respect all round whilst footballers think the 90 mins are free pass to do what they want to get what they want. You can shake hands before and after but it means nothing if you act like a young child during the game. Can't stand it.

  2. Jarvis
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Lukaku incoming

    1. Mauro Boselli
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      nah

    2. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Two penalties, don't see that every day.

  3. Mauro Boselli
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    I'm biased...but really liking the look of Wijnaldum

  4. RangerMouse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    RMT?

    Butland - Schmeichel
    Clyne - Azpi - Williams - Morgan - M.Richards
    Hazard - Sterling - Walcott - Ritchie - Johnson(Norwich)
    Kane - Benteke - Sakho

    1. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I like your choices at the back and in midfield, less so up top

  5. Mr Pink
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    I see a lot of people argue that Benteke won't do well because "Villa had the most crosses last year and Liverpool were second to last". Considering that Liverpool often had a combination of Sterling, Coutinho and Lallana making runs into the box last season, it makes sense that they didn't try to cross it that often even when they were in good positions to do so. Having Benteke there in the mix might change that picture a bit.

    1. Mauro Boselli
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I remember thinking buying Carroll and Downing made a lot of sense, but then they chose to never play them at the same time. I even saw Carroll actually coming off for Downing or vice versa on numerous occasions.

      Idiots

      1. Mr Pink
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Yes, I remember that. I also thought they bought Lambert as a plan B to get some more presence in the box if they were struggling for goals, but they never seemed to use him that way.

        My point is, however, that I think that, first of all Benteke has more in his locker than just headers, but I also expect Liverpool to cross more with him leading the line. The quality of Moreno's crosses has not convinced me, but Clyne might end up being the biggest benefactor here.

    2. Coot
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Also, I believe the majority of Benteke's goals for Villa were not scored with his head?

  6. Albert Cole
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Butland/Speroni the best GK combo? Maybe McCarthy will get Palace minutes?

    1. jerseyboy
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I had this but have now switched to Butland/Ruddy. Still tempted to go back to Cech or Courtious +£4m.

  7. Albert Cole
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Best 4.5 defs? Have Ivan and Clyne, and want three 4.5s to alternate the third spot.

    1. Az
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I've got Kosc and Clyne currently and have Kaboul, Huth and Francis. Kaboul is a bit of a gamble and may become O'Shea, but SUN, LEI, BOU looks quite decent rotation wise!

      1. Albert Cole
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Who is this Francis?

        1. stefanos56
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          He plays for Bournemouth - I can't remember the stats I was impressed by to be honest, but he had some really impressive stats last season and (as with all promoted players) if he can adjust he may well be a bargain. He should be a guaranteed starter and Bournemouth don't have a bad run in the first 8 games (home games versus Villa, Leicester, Sunderland, Watford).

    2. jerseyboy
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Francis, Richards, Prodl, Targett.

  8. Az
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Mertesacker more at risk of rotation than Kosc or pretty nailed on for 5.5?

    Slightly worried about the slow old German, but downgrading Kosc means I can have Wally instead of Rambo.

    1. Old
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Wally+Mert = Two risk players
      Rambo+Kos = Two no risk players

      1. Old
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        not NO risk... but still, not so much risk...you get it 🙂

    2. Baby Face Nelson
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Mert is nailed.

    3. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hasn't Wenger been talking up Gabriel? That would make me nervous.

  9. Old
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    In need of decision-help:

    1) Hazard, Chadli, Benteke
    2) Fab, Depay, Kane

    Who will score the most?

    1. All Bäcks
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I think 1

      1. Old
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        thx Backs

    2. Del Griffiths
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      1) I think. Think Kane might go backwards a wee bit.

      1. Old
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        cheers Griffiths

  10. Baby Face Nelson
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Haz & Benteke

    v

    Cesc & Costa

    1. Latko Zahovic
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Feeling good about this draft. Lacking Aguero worries a bit. Any opinions?

      Courtois (Hennesey)
      Mertesacker - Cedric - Huth (Coates, Bassong)
      Hazard - Özil - Depay - Mane (Wanyama)
      Giroud - Benteke - Lukaku

    2. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      A

  11. Do I Not Like Orange
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    How dangerous do you think going without any MCI attacking cover for the first 3 is? Originally had Yaya, but playing around with it this morning gives me a front 8 of:

    Depay/Ramsey/Ozil/Ritchie (Wanyama)
    Rooney/Benteke/Costa

    I think I could live with that for the first few weeks, then swap 2 of the 3 to Aguero and 1 other once form and viable cheap strikers become more apparent.

    1. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Not essential to start with. I'm starting with Silva though.

    2. jerseyboy
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm tempted by Sterling but may wait and see. Looks essential from GW4 though.

    3. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Continuing to play around with it will make you go blind☺

  12. memo
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    A Depay + Kane
    or
    B Henderson + Costa
    thanks

    1. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      A

    2. Kryten
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      A because Henderson competeing with Milner and Chelsea second fixture

      1. memo
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks much appreciated. A it is

      2. stefanos56
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Henderson (captain) and Milner (been in fab form and signed on promise of playing time) should both start. Can should be player who suffers game time. Hard to call who will gain most points between Henderson and Milner - shouldn't be much between the two and I've opted for Milner.

  13. Captain Peacock
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Little thought experiment I found while perusing the Guardian article on Balotelli: would you consider him for a fantasy team if he went to Aston Villa to play under Sherwood, who has rejuvenated two strikers and counting?

    1. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I honestly cannot see a man with Balotellis ego going to Villa

      1. AK ⭐
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        This

      2. Captain Peacock
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Pity, because I think that's exactly what he needs right now. A team where he can not only be the man, but have everything tailored to his strengths.

      3. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        His agent would not allow it

    2. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Oh no. Alerting our collective morbid curiosity. 😉

    3. SUAREZ_MESSI_COUTINHO
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No

    4. stefanos56
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I wouldn't touch Balotelli - shoots and misses too much from distance (I think he had the most off-target shots in the top 5 European leagues last season) and doesn't work hard enough to get in to goalscoring positions. A waste of money. The Villa point is an interesting one, though.

  14. AK ⭐
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Repost from the last article

    A) Courtois, 4.0, Bassong, Ozil, Costa

    B) Butland, Ruddy, Ivanovic, Walcott, Benteke

    I am on A atm, simply cause it gets easier for me to get Aguero for him and he is a legit captaincy option GW1.

    Though B is very, very tempting..

    1. All Bäcks
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I prefer B

    2. Kryten
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      B but biased as I prefer 2 playing keepers

      1. AK ⭐
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Cheers both. 🙂

  15. Djmc119
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Any news of an App release? Sorry, I'm sure this will have been asked before

  16. 11bigboy11
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Please RMT 🙂

    Ruddy, Rudd
    Azpi, Merte, O'Shea, Huth, Saylor
    Hazard, Wally, Sterling, Depay, Ozil
    Rooney, Deeney, 4.5

    3-5-2, Will probably go 4.5 --> bandwagon and downgrade the mid that isn't playing well / isn't playing 🙂

    Thanks!

    1. Captain Peacock
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I don't understand the widespread liking for O'Shea. Team looks pretty good though

      1. 11bigboy11
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Havn't decided on the 4.5s and 4.0 yet. Just gone with whats been most popular on here so far. Thanks.

    2. Kryten
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Like it only concern merte and oshea have slight chance of losing place and you could be short at the back

      1. 11bigboy11
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Would you suggest downgrading Merte and upgrading Saylor? May need to rely on some defenders if the likes of sterling and walcott lose thier places.

        1. Kryten
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Maybe or get darmien and there plenty of good 5m alderwield or Liverpool def maybe lescott

          1. 11bigboy11
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Would love to get Darmian (United fan) but LVG's comments are worrying, despite his consistent starting line ups. Might look at a 5.0 and upgrade Saylor. Is O'Shea not very nailed?

    3. dcarlito
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Saylor is not nailed on at all I understand Newcastle are buying/have bought a new defender

  17. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Repost from earlier. So, I've done a bunch of research on expected points gain per extra $ spent and have come to the decision that the best bang for buck lies with defenders and the worst of the lot are forwards.

    Stekelenburg / Hennessey
    Azpi / Kos / Cedric / Clyne / Francis
    Henderson / Ozil / Walcott / Hazard / Mane
    Kane / Wilson / Jerome

    I would be playing a 4-5-1 in most weeks. I really like the concept of the team but I don't think it's refined yet. I think it would be good to free up another million somehow and upgrade Kane to Rooney, yeah?

    1. 11bigboy11
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Similar to mine just above, except yours is more defensive heavy while mine is really all out midfield. Would love an article on your research 🙂

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Did a few hot topics before but will probably post an article soon. I just saw yours but I think Henderson gives immense value - especially as it lets you upgrade in defense.

        1. 11bigboy11
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          You'd downgrade my Sterling or Depay?

          1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Depay. Sterling far more guarantee of playing time.

    2. Alan Hansen's Emu
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Would not play 4-5-1 with those strikers.

      Upgrade!!

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Well, I only have to play one of them. As I said, happy to upgrade, suggestions?

    3. 11bigboy11
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Oh, and definitely upgrade Kane to Rooney IMO

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Yup. How is the question.

        1. 11bigboy11
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Id downgrade Jerome and/or defence, but obviously you like your defence having done the research.

    4. Djmc119
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Or downgrade Kane to Benteke then upgrade one of Wilson and Jerome to Sakho. Also maybe Mane to Payet for the extra 0.5?

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I can downgrade Kane but I won't be playing those forwards anyway. No point upgrading a bench player right?

        1. Djmc119
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Well neither Kane or Benteke are fixture proof and sakho has great scoring chances in gw 2 and 3 so I think it would be worth investing in him, still a bargain buy

    5. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      1/2
      1/3
      2/3
      1/2 = 5/10 You will need to sort that defence, as a minimum.

      1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        What's the issue with the defense? Thought it was rather strong!

          1. WHY ALWAYS MESUT?
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Oh yeah, may tweak the personnel but the structure is more the query at the moment.

  18. Nabs Kebabs
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Giroud vs Benteke is tough imo

    1. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Squeeze them both in? 😉

      1. Ziro Becomes One
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Lucy, sorry i didnt bookmark earlier but could you link up your Saints FAQ hot topic?

        1. Lucy.
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          No problem 🙂

          http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/07/21/fixture-analysis-rotation-pairs-crystal-palace-and-stoke/?hc_page=15#hc_comment_10567950

          Please take note of the updates on the bottom of the thread of comments underneath!

          1. Ziro Becomes One
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            thanx.

          2. Ziro Becomes One
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Ah, Just noticed you had replied to my question in a comment on that thread. If I hadn't asked to check that again today, then would have missed the updates. Thanx again.

            1. Lucy.
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 4 months ago

              No problem 🙂 Happy to help.

      2. Nabs Kebabs
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        nah, Rooney and Sakho are locks 😉

        1. JÆKS ⭐
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Add Benteke and you'll have the same strikers as me
          Not sure about Sakho anymore though

  19. Kings of Lyon ★
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    If Aguero misses the start of the season then I reckon that Ill just play the first 4 GWs then WC. If not then I am ridiculously happy with my Aguero team

  20. Uber Mo
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Hi chaps please could I have an RMT and some feedback on this first draft:
    Ruddy Rudd
    Azpi Aldrrweireld Muniesa Morgan Senderos
    Hazard Yaya Walcott Redmond Bentaleb
    Costa Rooney Sakho

    1. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Not bad, Im not a fan of Redmond but its a good team. Watch out for Morgan he will miss the start of the season

      1. Uber Mo
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks. One of the limitations of having four big hitters (Rooney, Costa, Haz, Walcott) is that it only leaves £5.5m for the fourth midfielder. Redmond is a complete punt and is one of the players I'm unsure about.

        1. Kings of Lyon ★
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          I know what you mean idf be looking to find that 0.5 somewhere to upgrade to a 6.0 but Redmond could work as you say it is a punt 🙂

          1. Uber Mo
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            There's nobody coming in at 6 that I fancy though. Do you have any suggestions? I like the look of a few at £7m but that would involve some wholesale changes

            1. Kings of Lyon ★
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 4 months ago

              Sissoko, Adam, Ritchie Montero are all on my watchlist around that price range

  21. Lucy.
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    "In his ideal world he would like to play with a strong guy next to him, a player who is very strong physically, and he play off him. We have so many offensive players which makes that very difficult to combine all of them together.”

    Giroud looks fine to me.

    1. JÆKS ⭐
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Until they sign Benzema 😀

    2. Ziro Becomes One
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I was just about to post this. But I being a Gunner would like to take a biased view of this comment.

      I think Wenger is toying with the idea of a 4-4-2 or more likely a 4-1-3-2. Even though Theo is right footed, he has always worked from the right and never tried to be an inside-forward on the left. So,in some easier matches, Arsene might break out the following:

      ------------------Cech--------------------

      Bellerin---Kosc---Mert-----Gibbs-

      -------------------Coq---------------------

      ---Ramsey---Ozil----Sanchez-----

      ----------Theo----Giroud---------------

      Santi to come on for Ozil after an hour.

      The FBs are my choice vs easier opposition, but that side does look full of goals!

  22. Link
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    How's she looking Gentlemen?

    Would you kindly RMT?

    Butland - Ruddy
    Azpi - Shaw - Jenkinson - Mings - Targett
    Hazard - Walcott - Ozil - Mane - King
    Rooney - Benteke - Wilson

    1. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Shaw makes me nervous. Other than that, like it 😀

  23. FatmanAndRobin
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    7.0 mil to spend on a 4th Mid...

    Recommendations?

    Hendo/Milner/Chadli/Tadic/Wijnaldum or other??

    1. JÆKS ⭐
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Henderson or Milner

    2. All Bäcks
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      If no Erikssen or Kane, i like Chadli.

  24. savas
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Closed! 🙂

  25. JÆKS ⭐
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Posted this on the wrong article...again

    A) Cedric Baker

    B) Oshea Francis

    Courtois - Hennesey
    Koscielny - Williams - Huth - xxx- xxx

  26. reason17
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Best striker on a budget of 9.5.
    Will Kane reply replicate? Can giroid be ignored?

    1. Mauro Boselli
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      my doctor told me never to ignore my Giroids.

  27. ShaunGoater123
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Am I set?

    Cech / Hennessey

    Ivan / Cedric / Francis / Huth / Ward

    Fabregas / Walcott / Sterling / Ritchie / Anya

    Deeney / Costa / Rooney

    0.5 ITB

    Planned moves for Aguero:
    Ivan > Azpili
    Costa > Aguero
    Sterling > 8.5

    What do you think?

    1. Roberto Baggio
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Planning like that will result in early wc.. So might as well plan for early wc IMO

    2. Pariße
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      a good team, but the lack of Hazard is a worry. similar to one of my drafts, where i had caz, ozil and hendo instead of walcott, ritchie and sterling

    3. stefanos56
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I think that's a strong team. Points all over the pitch.

  28. Alan Hansen's Emu
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Is it mad Ramsey being my preferred Arsenal mid?

    Don't buy into the Walcott hype, and Ozil is always a little toothless. Santi played deep and relied on peons... Ramsey the best pick?

    (Ignoring sanchez)

    1. Taffer
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I got Walcott and Rambo - will downgrade Wally to whoever is the hot 6.5 to get Kun around GW3/4.

    2. Uber Mo
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Ramsey is playing deep in the pre season frendlies at the mo I believe. Understand what you're saying about wally but couldn't you start with him and then downgrade if he doesn't cut it? That way you get to react to whoever is in form

  29. Kryten
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    I dont we many Bournemouth west Ham defence rotations in many rmt surprised as the fixtures are great

    1. GoonerByron
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I have Mings and Jenkinson at the moment.

      1. Link
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Same

  30. Fader
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Thoughts? I like the balance atleast...

    Panti
    Azpil - Kos - Yoshida
    Sterling - Cazorla - Hazard - Coutinho
    Rooney - Defoe - Lukaku

    Subs : - Hennersey / O'Shea / Whittaker / Wanyama

    1. Fader
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      was thinking if Defoe doesn't work I could go Coutinho - > Hendo/Milner and Defoe - > Sakho

      Aguero wk3 for Rooney plus midfield downgrade

    2. Toast
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      GK: Good but henner hasn't moved yet
      Def: Yoshida not nailed on if they sign another. Not sure about Norwich defence
      Mid: I think Milner or Hendo better than Coutinho
      Fwd: personally think Sun will be poor offensively. Not a big Lukaku fan due to fixtures