672 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Ninja Škrtel
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A. Mitoma, Wissa
    B. Mbuemo, Pedro

    1. N00B
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    2. royals forever
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B with Eze

    3. Amartey Partey
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

  2. royals forever
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Are there any changes that you would to this team

    Pickford Leno

    Stones Shaw Andersen Udogie Beyer

    Saka Martinelli Eze Enzo Jensen

    Haaland Kane Jackson

    0 ITB

    Any ideas would be appreciated

    1. The Wheeler Dealer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I really think you should downgrade Jackson to improve your midfield or defence, they're both weak at the expense of a completely unproven talent and a very unknown quantity in this new chelsea side. Enzo is not an FPL asset.

      Enzo and Jansen can both be turned into very solid 6-7m picks if you do Jackson > fodder

    2. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Enzo and Jensen are too much of a compromise just to fit in Kane, it even affects the defence massively.

    3. sirmorbach
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Leno to 4.0, Shaw to Gabriel/Saliba, Jackson to fodder. Upgrade Enzo and Jensen.

  3. THFC4LIFE
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Shaw or Joao Pedro for 11th starting player?

    1. royals forever
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Shaw

    2. MoSalalalalalalalalah
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Shaw

    3. Amartey Partey
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      JP

    4. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Jp

    5. THFC4LIFE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Very conclusive

    6. Bubz
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      JP

  4. Tales of Bionic
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Playing a 3-5-2 with Salah and Haaland.

    Johnstone (Areola)
    Stones-Estu-Gabriel (Botman, Kaborè)
    Rash-Salah-Saka-Mbeumo-Mitona
    Haaland-J.Pedro (Mubama)

    Feel J.Pedro is a gamble, and Watkins could continue his great run from last season.

    The decision: Stones, Mbeumo, J.Pedro and Rash vs Colwill(4,5), Gibbs-White, Watkins and Bruno.

    Any other suggestions greatly appreciated!

    1. Nice to Finally Michu
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I’ve got a very similar decision on my hands I’d go with the latter in your case

      1. Tales of Bionic
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thx!

    2. marco_atk85
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I would only do chilwell over Stones considering he has more attack potential and Eze over mitoma since 3 BHA players are too much if you would like to get rid of them after week 3

      1. Tales of Bionic
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thx, good points!

    3. BECKS TO THE FUTURE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I’m surprised this team is possible! It’s very good.

      1. Tales of Bionic
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thx!

    4. nicksilver
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Very similar team to mine. I've opted for Watkins, just about managed to squeeze him in

  5. Nice to Finally Michu
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Thoughts?

    A) Mbeumo + Watkins
    B) Rashford + Joao P

    1. Eyes of Blue
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    2. MoSalalalalalalalalah
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B - not a fan of Brentford players currently.

    3. Z
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      It is B for me all the way

    4. marco_atk85
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B all the way

    5. Nice to Finally Michu
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Woah was and have been on A. Is it because of the strength of Rashford?

      1. Tales of Bionic
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I would also say B, due to Rash.

    6. Winston.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

  6. MoSalalalalalalalalah
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Estu + Martinelli
    B) Stones + Maddison

    1. Eyes of Blue
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    2. Tony Moon
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

  7. Z
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    At first, i wanted to go only with Haaland
    Two weeks ago, i decided that Salah is "must have", so i ll go with 2 premiums
    Now....i am thinking about 3mium....i am sick man

    1. Eyes of Blue
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Ya can’t have ‘em all!

    2. Egg Fried Reus 69
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      impossible

    3. The Wheeler Dealer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      if the 3rd premium you are thinking of is Kane, what might be a better option is to think about just how much better maddison and son will be as value picks with kane up top in an attacking team style

    4. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Impossible to have a decent team with all three of Haaland Kane and Salah

      1. GENERATION X
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Which is exactly how the game should be priced...

      2. InsertPunHere
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        4.5-Areola
        5-4.5-4.5-4-4
        Salah-Saka-Eze-Mitoma-4.5
        Kane-Haaland-4.5

        Best I could come up with.

        1. nicksilver
          • 16 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Yeah basically it although could go with:
          4.5-Turner
          5.0, 4.5, 4.5, 4.0, 4.0
          Salah, Saka, Eze, Enciso, 5.5
          Kane, Haaland, 4.5

  8. tuvok
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    I can’t decide on Salah and thought some of you might be interested in my for and against thinking.

    Three reasons for Salah:

    (1) Captaincy. Obviously the key issue is that, at 12.5 Salah isn’t worth it if you’re not going to captain him fairly regularly. So Haaland perma-cap with a Saka/Rashford thrown in now and again makes Salah unviable.

    Looking at the fixtures though, between now and the first WC (say, GW14 latest) there’s a case to say it’s actually pretty even between Salah and Haaland re fixtures.

    Haaland is stand out essential captain for 4 weeks:
    GWs: 1, 4, 6, 11

    Salah is stand out for 4:
    GWs: 2, 9, 10, 12

    Saka a poss cap for GW3, maybe 5 & 7 too. Rashford poss cap for GWs 7, 8, 12, 13. So even with them thrown in Salah still merits the captaincy in weeks 2, 9, and 10.

    (2) Data with Trent playing inverted. See recent FPL Black Box (episode 110, about an hour in). Basically Salah’s shots, touches in the box, chances created, and XGI all increased significantly when Trent started playing inverted role. His XGI went up to a whopping 0.95 (ie likely to be involved in a goal a game - comparable to Haaland’s 1.03). As we already know, Salah is certainly capable of matching/surpassing Haaland.

    (3) The popular theory that Liverpool are going to have to attack more, and score more, to make up for their defensive shortcomings. And looking at their attacking options, they have excellent creators from deep (Trent & Mac) plus great runners into the channels (Darwin, Salah, Diaz, Jota). They will certainly cause problems for the defences they are up against each week, and Salah is the one nailed tried and tested way of getting into that attack.

    Three reasons against Salah:

    (1) A personal one, but I fancy Arsenal and United to start the season well. Both have fairly settled systems with a core of players that know it well and new additions that should slot in fairly easily. They both have excellent fixtures, especially GW1. No Salah means you can go all out on proven arsenal and Utd - eg midfield of Saka, Martinelli, Bruno, & Rashford. And at their price points it’s easy to move to an early bandwagon (inc a Liverpool mid for GW2)

    (2) Its quite hard to get a balanced team with Salah. Pre season can lead you to feel like popular picks that have had decent pre seasons are more nailed than they are. Having players like Pedro in the starting 11 could quickly become a fire that is hard to put out, especially when your bench is full of dross.

    (3) Finally, ownership. I know this shouldn’t be a big issue but it’s looking like Rashford and Saka are going to be 50%+ owned. Bruno also has a higher ownership than Salah right now in FPL and is 50% owned in the FPL Team template. Most non-Salah teams will have a second arsenal attacker too. So if one of them does bang, it will hurt. Whereas Salah is looking like he’s stuck around 20-25% ownership. This also means most people will be captaining Haaland GW2. Now, I do think Salah is a better option, but if Haaland does bang that week (and his home record is obv very good) your rank will plummet.

    That’s my current thinking anyway, and leaning towards owning Salah. Interested to hear if anyone has any thoughts

    1. MoSalalalalalalalalah
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Thank you for putting your resume together. We will review it shortly.

    2. InsertPunHere
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Managed to get Salah-Rashford-Saka-Odegaard-Chukwuemeka in a midfield. Means 4-4-2 starting Wissa and a 4.5 defender every week, but I think it could work.

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        That's what I'm planning to start with for the first 2 GW. Then after the BOU game Salah and the benched forward can be switched out for Son (or Bruno) and an 8m forward (Watkins or Jesus) in a 3-4-3.

    3. Hooky
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      But what about Kane?

    4. Ruud vom Mistelroum
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I've just got Haaland to start. My thinking is I'd rather have an 11 full of fairly nailed 8M ish players (saka, rashfiord, martinelli...) To begin with

      Then once we know which of the 5-7M lot are starting regularly I can switch to them on my inevitable GW2 wildcard

      1. Boxwoods
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Interesting. I'm thinking better to start with Mo and make sacrifices in defense. Then once we know which of the 5-7M lot are starting regularly, evalute whether to downgrade Mo or 8M ish midfielders or Watkins to spread funds a bit. Possibly even with a mini WC (-4) in GW3. If Mo starts guns blazing, it will be tough to resist urge to take hits to get him in.

    5. Bartowski
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Spoken like a true Vulcan.

    6. Emp
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I Appreciate your efforts in this post ! With regards to the captaincy fixtures I’d prefer waiting till gw10 to target Salah in there to have him for those fixtures and just miss gw2 and take chances on Haaland where ownership is going to mitigate the downside anyways.

    7. ameisin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Nice effort, thanks!
      I'm leaning more towards going without Salah for now, with [Saka Ode Rash BrunoF Jota] in a 3-5-2. I'm hedging my bets that Jota will hold down that CF position.

      GW9 looks like an excellent WC time, after the international break and with some lush fixtures for Pool.

  9. InsertPunHere
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Mubama, Mitoma, Eze
    B) Chukwuemeka, Pedro, Maddison

    1. MoSalalalalalalalalah
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    2. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

  10. riot
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    First and only RMT this season - done some tinkering and I think I'm happy with this squad. Any glaring issues? I know about Ramsdale risk but prefer him still.

    Ramsdale (Strakosha)
    Porro - Botman - Baldock (Colwill, Beyer)
    Maddison - Sterling - Saka - Havertz - Grealish
    Kane - Haaland (Archer)

    1. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      It’s……………different

    2. InsertPunHere
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Wouldn’t have Strakosha as backup. Impressive to manage four differentials in midfield, or which Havertz and Sterling are no-goes for me. Defence feels too light for me tbh. Feel like I’m being overly critical though, it’s mainly down to players you don’t have rather than ones you do.

      1. riot
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Fair point, might as well go Areola

    3. THFC4LIFE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      It’s different to the boring template, could be gold or could end in tears. Good luck

    4. Tellloth
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Surely it's better to downgrade Ramsdale to a 4.5 and get an Arsenal defender by upgrading Borman or Colwill? I don't mind the strategy of going short on the defence but feels like you're doing it to keep Ramsdale in when he's potentially a risk in a few weeks.

      Also personally I'd run with one of the slightly cheaper mids instead of Havertz, assuming you're priced out of Martinelli.

      1. riot
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks for the suggestions all. Think downgrading Ramsdale might be the way to go.

    5. Tony Moon
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'd downgrade Porro to Udogie, seems nailed and just as attacking. Then you could at least change one of your 4m defs to 4.5m.

      E.g. Udogie and Mings would be better than Porro and Beyer.

      And agree with the Ramsdale comments too.

  11. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Which option:

    A) Pedro Kabore Beyer Estupinan
    B) Mubama Botman Cash Estupinan
    C) Mubama Botman Stones Kabore

  12. Egg Fried Reus 69
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    opinions on this starting xi
    onana
    trent estupinan stones gabriel
    saka martinelli rashford fernandes mitoma
    haaland

    451 unbalanced formation?

    1. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Think Trent is awful value early on. Would rather go Watkins

      Besides that looks good. Bench?

  13. Tellloth
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Onana (Pickford)
    Gabriel Estu Stones (Botman) (Beyer)
    Saka Martinelli BrunoF Mitoma Eze
    Haaland Watkins (J.Pedro)

    1.0m ITB

    Thoughts?

  14. MoSalalalalalalalalah
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Nico Gonzalez to Brentford may give another reason to steer clear of Mbeumo.

    1. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Completely disagree

      1. MoSalalalalalalalalah
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        How so? I feel Gonzalez has always been at his best coming off the right.

        1. Coys96
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Mbuemo is Brentford’s first choice attacker and if Gonzalez joins it’ll mean him playing through the middle.

          I feel they’re missing a bit going forward so Gonzalez would definitely fill that void & create chances for him

          Plus Gonzalez has played mostly on the left (but yeah agree re. the right )

          1. MoSalalalalalalalalah
            • 7 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            I guess you're right. They'll probably deploy him on the left and maybe Wissa will continue through the middle. Would prefer him on the right though.

  15. Coys96
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Thoughts? - want to go against the grain a bit

    Pickford
    Stones | Estupinan | Guehi
    Saka | Rashford | Mitoma | Diaby
    Haaland | Kane | JP

    Turner | R.James | Chukwuemeka | Kabore

    and…
    A) Rashford
    B) Odegaard + 0.5
    C) Martinelli + 1.0

    1. InsertPunHere
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Doesn’t seem massively against the grain to me… A

      1. Coys96
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers

  16. RICICLE
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Quick one for ya guys:

    A) Maddison + Pedro

    B) Mitoma + Wissa

    Thank you!

    1. MoSalalalalalalalalah
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

    2. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

    3. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers guys!

  17. Kane Train
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Thoughts on this team?

    Onana
    Stones / Saliba / Estupinan / Gabriel
    Salah / Saka / Bruno / Mitoma
    Darwin / Haaland

    1. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Darwin the obvious concern. Can’t really see any reason to go for him and I’m unsure about x2 Arsenal defence but can’t argue against the rest of it

  18. Gonzola
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Is there any reason I’m not seeing Steele in more teams. Brighton keeper for 4.5 and may possibly grab the odd assist. Not sure why Pickford is more popular.

    1. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Fixtures after gw3?

      1. Baps Hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        And Europe...

        1. Bushwhacker
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Don't see why Europe comes in. A keeper is very capable of playing all games.

    2. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Is he nailed with Verbruggen's arrival?

  19. Baps Hunter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Anytime goalscorer odds vs Spurs:
    Wissa 3.5
    Mbeumo 3.8

    So according to bookies Wissa is little more likely to score than Mbeumo. As fwd he gets 1 pt less, but he is also .5 cheaper. However, Nakamba is better sub than any 4.5 fwd. Since Wissa is more likely to score and cheaper and much less owned, he is my choice in this coin toss category. Less TV risk and more likely become one of first bandwagons. Mbeumo is not good or owned enough to be serious threat to anyone's rank either.

    1. Coys96
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Assist odds would be shorter on Mbuemo. But yeah I think they’re almost a coin toss

      1. Coys96
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Plus do the odds take into account Mbuemo on pens?

        1. I Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Yes. If we know that Mbeumo is on pens the bookies know it too.

        2. Baps Hunter
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          They do.

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Hadn't noticed this Mosalalalal mesag:

      "Nico Gonzalez to Brentford may give another reason to steer clear of Mbeumo."

      Now I have started to wonder if both Wissa's and Mbeumo's minutes are in danger, at least for long term.

    3. AIRMILES
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I have them both. After GW1, Brentford are facing Fulham, Palace and Bournemouth. Feel it's worth stuffing my team with them both. And if I only got one, the other would do the scoring.

  20. Saka White Rice
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    If Ramsdale stays surely Ramsdale+Colwill is better than Onana+Gabriel. You save 0.5

    1. Bartowski
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Why can't you just have Onana+Colwill?

    2. WVA
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      lol timing

  21. revelc
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    thoughts on this? G2G?

    Johnstone
    Gabriel - Estu - Botman
    Salah - Saka - Martinelli - Rashy - Eze
    Haaland - Pedro

    Areola - Cash - Baldock - Mubama

  22. sirmorbach
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A. TAA, play Botman every week (Baldock first sub)
    B. Martinelli, rotate Botman and another 4.5
    C. Watkins, rotate Botman and another 4.5

    1. Tony Moon
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      C

  23. AzzaroMax99
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    4.5 mid:

    a) Anderson
    B) Chukwuemeka
    C) ?

  24. BantamJJ
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Hi all, any advice? I'm going small(ish) ATB

    Onana (Areola),
    Estupinan, Gabriel, Ashley Young (Pinnock, Baldock),
    Saka Mitoma Bruno Salah Eze,
    Jackson Haaland (Mubama).

  25. GE
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    First draft - what do you think?

    (0.5 itb)

    Johnstone
    Chillwell/Gabriel/Estu
    Rash/Bruno/Saka/Øde/Eze
    Haaland/Watkins

    Bench: Areola, Beyer, Kabore, Osula

  26. Tonyawesome69
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    I think Ortega would come in as my 4m GK and City defence cover if we get a leak on Friday night. Also would help the headache trying to pick 3 defenders between Gabriel, Stones, Chilwell and Estupinan.

    https://twitter.com/4lex_mcfc/status/1688917171655884801?t=hJA7hYP5gGpYMAuXiTMBYw&s=19

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Server will be on it's arse at 6pm Friday

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        From recollection the server performance improved towards the end of the season.

        1. I Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          The traffic at GW1 deadline would be on another level.

          1. Tonyawesome69
            • 7 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            Yeah probably the case. I don't think it'll stop me from trying to make a last minute change

        2. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Half the player-base has given up at the end of the season. GW1 is peak traffic, will be halftime before the game updates probably.

  27. dshv
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    1. Martinelli Bruno Watkins
    2 Diaby/Eze Salah j.Pedro

    1. BantamJJ
      • 2 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I've been moving around these 6/7 players as well.. I have decided to leave Diaby and Pedro as wait and see.. I would go with 1)

    2. Livinginapool - Top 100 Any…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I've gone with 2 for now, but could easily end up with 1. It's a toughie...

  28. Robman
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Hi All - Are there any changes that you would suggest to this team:

    Flecken Areola

    Stones Shaw Estupinian Gabriel Baldock

    Rashford Mitoma Eze Saka Martinelli Garnacho (if a likely starter)

    Haaland Kane Mubuma(4.5)

    0 ITB

    Any ideas would be appreciated

    1. AIRMILES
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I count six midfielders, and I'm good at counting.

      1. Robman
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        whoops Martinelli is not in my team- thats a mistake 🙂

    2. coriswrasse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Martinelli a slight risk for minutes but will get you points.
      Are you looking at a 2-4-4?

      1. Robman
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        yes 4-4-2 formation
        martinelli is a mistake - I can't afford him lol

    3. Plasencia76
      • 2 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      all of them

  29. coriswrasse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    How do rate this slightly different squad?
    Areola Onana (What's My Name)
    Saliba, Estupian, Stones, Baldock, Beyer
    Eze, Saka, Diaby, Rashford, Nakamba
    Kane, Haaland, Pedro

  30. Livinginapool - Top 100 Any…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Any 5m defenders worth considering outside of the Arsenal players and Estupinan?

    1. AIRMILES
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Gvardiol (eventually), Porro?

      1. Livinginapool - Top 100 Any…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Think Porro will play?

      2. WVA
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Porro dropped for Emerson

    2. Eat my goal!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Moreno (obvs when fit)