Team Guides
14 August 2026 208 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

In this article, we’re looking at Ipswich Town’s midfielders and forwards from a Fantasy Premier League (FPL) perspective.

You can read our articles on the Tractor Boys’ manager and defence via the links below.

To provide a fan’s perspective, we’ve included insights from Ivan Fisher, aka FPL Reuser on X.

Data comes from StatsBomb, Opta, Fotmob and WhoScored.

WHAT IS IPSWICH’S GOAL-SCORING POTENTIAL IN FPL?

PWDLFAGDCSPTS
Overall record46231588047+331784
Home2314814317+261050
Away239773730+7734

Ipswich arrive in the Premier League after scoring the third-most goals in the Championship (80).

This tally was 17 shy of champions Coventry City, but 10 more than play-off winners Hull City.

Crucially, they provided plenty of opportunities for their attackers to deliver, sitting third for Opta expected goals (xG):

It is important to mention that Ipswich were awarded 10 penalties, four more than any other Championship side.

Even so, after a slow start, they were pretty consistent with their ability to create chances, which is captured below.

Above: Ipswich’s six-match rolling expected goals (xG) chart in 2025/26

As for set-pieces, they ranked mid-table for goals scored (12), but went up to fourth for xG from dead-ball situations.

THE PLAYERS

2025/26: APPS, GOALS AND ASSISTS

PlayerPrimary position in 2025/26Starts (sub apps)MinsGoalsAssists
Jack ClarkeLW23 (23)2,382161
Jaden PhilogeneLW24 (11)1,997122
George HirstCF25 (17)2,113113
Marcelino NunezAM24 (12)2,16737
Ivan Azon*CF20 (18)1,79454
Sindre Walle EgeliRW18 (10)1,48142
Kasey McAteerRW14 (14)1,25631
Azor MatusiwaCM453,86113
Jens Cajuste*CM13 (17)1,19413
Jack TaylorCM24 (15)2,15721
Anis MehmetiAM11 (7)1,02921
Wes Burns*RW9 (9)79921
Chuba AkpomAM7 (22)88820
Sam Szmodics*AM8 (8)67710
Dan Neil*CM8 (8)66200
Conor Chaplin*AM1 (3)13300
Cameron HumphreysCM0 (3)1000
Chiedozie Ogbene**RB1 (1)9600
Ali Al HamadiRW0 (1)1100
Nathan Broadhead*AM0 (1)2200
*No longer at club
**Ogbene is more of a winger, but played most of his minutes at right-back in 2025/26

GOAL THREAT

Firstly, there was a lot of rotation across the forward spots, with none of the Ipswich attackers making more than 25 starts.

A lot of their goals came from wide areas, with Jack Clarke (£5.5m) the top scorer (16 goals).

But he only took the fifth-most shots (51), with Ivan Azon leading the way (79), followed by Marcelino Nunez (£5.0m, 69), Jaden Philogene (£5.5m, 67) and George Hirst (£5.0m, 65).

Azon has since returned to Como this summer, from where he was on loan.

Former Aston Villa winger Philogene was Ipswich’s second top-scorer, with 12 goals, although he has been linked with a move away in recent weeks, so that’s a mooted transfer to monitor.

As for Hirst, he offers work rate, pressing and decent link-up play, but it’s debatable if he is Premier League level, having scored only three goals and supplied one assist from five starts and 21 substitute appearances in his previous top-flight stint.

It’s no surprise, then, that Ipswich have already strengthened in this department with the arrival of Brazilian striker Emersonn (£5.5m) from Toulouse, plus attacking midfielders Abdul Fatawu (£5.5m) and Daizen Maeda (£5.5m).

ASSIST POTENTIAL

Nunez transitioned from a deeper role into a No 10 last season, showing his creative qualities with seven assists and 63 key passes.

But with Ipswich set to complete the signing of Julio Enciso, his own game-time prospects look bleak.

Clarke produced just one assist, but his 4.99 xG assisted tally suggests he was unlucky not to supply more.

Azor Matusiwa (£5.0m) ranked third, with three assists from 32 key passes.

DEFCON POTENTIAL

And it’s Matusiwa, the Dutch ball-winning midfielder who arrived from Rennes for £7.8m, who carries real DefCon potential.

He racked up more interceptions than any other Championship midfielder last season, averaging 11.75 DefCons per 90 minutes (below image from Fotmob):

You’d imagine that figure rises further as his team swaps promotion party for relegation fight.

He had to undergo thigh surgery in May, so we’ll have to see what shape he is in ahead of Gameweek 1.

It also remains to be seen if he’ll play alongside new signing Luis Florentino (£5.0m) or have to compete with him for one spot. Florentino is himself a bit of a DefCon magnet.

FINAL WORD

FPL new signings: Where will Emersonn fit in at Ipswich Town? 2

Ipswich have already signed a new striker in Emersonn. He will likely compete with Hirst for a place in the starting lineup, but given his newness to the league (and rather modest goal record to this point), it is advisable to adopt a wait-and-see approach.

As for Clarke and Philogene (if he stays), they can both be effective wide threats, but it’s debatable whether or not either player can produce goals and assists on a regular basis in the Premier League. They have a new positional rival in Maeda, too. The Japanese attacker first needs to prove himself south of the border, having stat-padded in Scotland.

“The good news is that despite the lack of firepower in the striker position, two players did deliver 28 goals and three assists between them. The even better news for FPL is that they are both midfielders. The less good news is that Jaden Philogene (12 goals and two assists) and Jack Clarke (16 goals and one assist – including six penalties) both play in the same position and have not yet demonstrated that they can replicate these performances in the Premier League. Both talented, technically gifted left wingers with an eye for goal, the hope is that they can continue their development under their new manager, but concerns about their strength and physicality remain. Nonetheless, on the assumption that Ipswich under O’Neil will be reliant on quick, vertical transitions, they are certainly ones to monitor in pre-season and could potentially make the step up.” – FPL Reuser

On the strength of pre-season so far, Fatawu will probably be one of the first names on the teamsheet as a right winger. He was very keen to shoot in the second tier, racking up more efforts than any other Championship player in 2025/26.

Matusiwa and/or Florentino have DefCon potential and, if playing, should tick over most weeks even without any attacking returns, potentially offering value at just £5.0m. There are still doubts around the former’s availability for Gameweek 1, however, having failed to feature in pre-season so far.

“… potentially of interest from a defensive perspective is Azor Matusiwa in central midfield (“the Dutch Kante”). He comes in at a budget price and could excel in a solid, pragmatic and well-organised Gary O’Neil set-up, offering plenty of DefCon potential.” – Ivan

In summary, then, it’s probably a wait-and-see on all of the Ipswich midfield/forward options:

“It is likely that the Ipswich squad that starts the new season will be largely unrecognisable from the squad that achieved promotion last season. And with Gary O’Neil replacing Kieran McKenna, it is likely to be a squad steeped in pragmatism rather than expression and flair. Nonetheless, while many fans may see the appointment as uninspiring, there is a world in which O’Neil is able to take the essence of what has been built over the McKenna years and strengthen and solidify it to meet the demands of the Premier League. For FPL however, it is very much a wait-and-see. New faces. New tactics. A new era.” – Ivan


Premier League 2026/27 fixtures released: FPL reaction
208 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Sheffield Wednesday
    • 6 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Anyone reading this Ipswich attack article? Anyone?

    1. Ball Ake
      • 2 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      They lost me at best.

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 6 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        It's all change from last season and consequently 'wait and see' at this stage. Might revisit when it on WC if they pull a Sunderland.

    2. Boberella
      • 9 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Leif Davis at 4m bench fodder probably the only Ipswich player I’ll have in the immediate future

    3. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      You're missing out on points from their first 2 fixtures by ignoring this article.

  2. Athletic Nasherbo
    • 9 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Thoughts?

    Kinsky
    Calafiori Shaw Hume
    BrunoF Semenyo Mbeumo Sarr
    Haaland J.Pedro DCL

    Dubravka Gomez Davis VanEwijk

    If Haaland won’t start GW1, I will start with Isak and move to Haaland GW2/3.

    1. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Considering no BB, I really like it. Sarr could he a great differential

      1. Athletic Nasherbo
        • 9 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Thanks. BB seems the popular strategy but some are half going for it by keeping Haaland and those who are using the Haaland money are pencilling in an early WC. On reflection, I prefer to wait and see given the amount of change this summer with new managers.

        1. Jules-C
          1 month, 17 days ago

          I will probably BB early as well, as I feel like that chip never comes through when you need it haha. But I agree on keeping the WC and FH a bit longer. Trying to find a more balanced squad to rotate myself as well with all the uncertainty

    2. WVA
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      1 month, 16 days ago

      Pretty much what I’ve been on for weeks but I have Szoboszlai over Sarr, hate Sarr forever

  3. Jules-C
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Been trying something a little new. BB GW1, what do you think?

    Donnarumma (Verbruggen)
    Maguire - Calafiori - N.Williams (Tarkowski - O’Shea)
    Semenyo - Mbeumo - Wirtz - Ndiaye (Gross)
    Haaland - JP - DCL

    I’m not really convinced on Gvardiol being nailed, that’s why I’m considering Donnarumma as one of the only save routes into the Man City defence. Would like to keep my WC and FH a little longer as well with this setup.

    1. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 9 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Donnarumma probably has a ceiling of 6 points, so not overly keen.

      Surprised by Haaland over BrunoF.

      1. Jules-C
        1 month, 17 days ago

        I agree on Donnarumma, but I feel like this is the same for the rest of the City defence except for O’Reilly should he become nailed. With regards to Haaland over Bruno, I just think that there is more value in midfield that can cover for Bruno than there is upfront instead of Haaland. But I agree that is a risk

    2. TafOnTour1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 2 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      I quite like it tbh, Donnarumma and Tarkowski are risky, but niche, picks so vaya con Dios!

      1. Jules-C
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Would you consider downgrading Tarkowski to a 5.0 and upgrading Ndiaye to Szoboslai?

        1. TafOnTour1
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 2 Years
          1 month, 17 days ago

          Depends on whether you'd want double Liverpool with Szoboszlai and Wirtz mate?!

          1. Jules-C
            1 month, 17 days ago

            Fair enough, maybe not worth it considering Ndiaye and Gross are both on pens and can rotate quite well. Also, Tarkowski gives me a jump off point to someone like an O’Reilly or VVD in case I really want them down the line

    3. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      The first thing this team screams is that it’s good for medium term so I like it as your stated aim is to hold FH and WC if possible
      I will also hold off on a city defence spot and pool too. I will wait til GW4 WC then Jacque might be an option and I really hope O’Reilly too .

      1. Jules-C
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Those would be great yes. I actually had Jacquet in my draft before, but with Araujo coming in I’m afraid neither of them will be nailed

  4. TafOnTour1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Sorry, bottomed out from the last article...What are we thinking of this draft guys?!

    Raya (Palmer)

    Gabriel, Palestra, Maguire, Rodon (Van Ewijk)

    Bruno Guimaraes, Semenyo, Mbuemo, Wirtz (Hughes)

    Haaland, Joao Pedro (Walle Egeli).

    1. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 9 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      I’d be going BrunoF over Haaland for the first 2.

    2. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Personally wouldn’t go Bruno G. Think of Szoboslai maybe? Even Tzolis would be a more exciting pick within Arsenal and he is cheaper. I do like the Gabriel/Raya combo. Will probably be a lot of points that are being ignored by others

      1. Albrightondknight
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Bruno G I agree. I will have Tzolis but how long he holds a place if he looks like having it for GW1 who knows.
        Gabriel is expensive but he is Gabriel. Will they be quite as good without Saliba?

  5. The Knights Template
    • 12 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Obvious Bob - Bruno update please!

    1. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      !!

  6. D15jones
    • 4 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Thoughts on this team guys? :

    Verbruggen, Leno
    Mosquera, Tark, Van Hecke, Maguire, Ajer
    Bruno F, Szob, Grob, Ampadu, Scott
    Haaland, Pedro, DCL

    1. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Seems a bit light in midfield to be honest. So many potential big hitters there that I would either take some money out of your defence or exchange Bruno for 2/3 premium mids

      1. D15jones
        • 4 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Okay cool fair enough thank you. Is my team a little boring at the moment?

    2. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Looks good for the medium term
      I don’t know about VanHecke - Ballard is the man for a season long hold.
      Maybe 2 better pick at BOU for 6 than Scott.
      Ampadu ok but the Brentford Sangare similar if you don’t want Leeds double up.

      1. D15jones
        • 4 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Just worry a bit about Sunderland this year and fancy Van Hecke to be nailed. Could be Tav rather than Scott but Scott is good for defcon

        1. Jules-C
          1 month, 17 days ago

          I actually think v.Hecke is a solid shout. Should be nailed as the only right footed CB. At BOU I would honestly mainly consider Kluivert. He is back on pens and in the no. 10 and looks ready to get back to his 24/25 form

          1. D15jones
            • 4 Years
            1 month, 17 days ago

            Yeah agreed. Why not Scott out of interest?

            1. Jules-C
              1 month, 17 days ago

              Personal preference. I just think the attacking potential of Kluivert could make him one of the best picks around that value

      2. Albrightondknight
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        I here you on Sunderland see it before when teams have a lot more game to play but I still think Ballard has SC for breakfast.
        Scott is fine just a bit meh. Tavenier mid risk and Kluivert most exciting but maybe the most risky pick.

  7. Bggz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    2 most nailed GW1?

    Guehi
    NOR
    Gvardiol
    Nunes
    Khua
    Ruben
    Ait-Nouri

    1. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Most nailed is probably Nunes, but also the least exciting for his price point… I’m trying a new setup with Donnarumma now as the whole City defence is a little uncertain and he is cheaper than Nunes

      1. Bggz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        boooring

    2. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      I am not going there for GW1 even the CS might not make this clear - too many options. Think I will wait a few weeks and see if O’Reilly is nailed.

      1. Bggz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        so much uncertainty throughout

  8. Bggz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Who will start in goal for Spurs?

    1. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Chance are Vicario will be gone. Looks like Kinsky - if not there will be scenes. Ownership is huge.

    2. yousunkmybattleship
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Kinsky 100%

  9. Albrightondknight
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Opinions on this attempt at an aggressive GW1 BB. All 3 Arsenal placeholders til after CS game.
    GW3 plan something like Mbeumo and Tzolis to
    Szob and Foden.
    Or Mbeumo and Arsenal defender to Szob and O’Reilly. Even Isak in GW3 is possible.
    I can’t fool myself that this ain’t a GW 4 WC and probably a GW6 FH

    Lammens Verbruggen

    Mosquera Calafiori Gvardiol Ballard Shaw

    Mbeumbo Wirtz Foden Tzolis Le Fee

    Haaland Pedro DCL

    1. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Sorry wrong draft.
      Gvardiol and Foden
      Are Ajer and Semenyo

      1. Jules-C
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Looks decent! If you want to make it more future proof I would consider either Le Fee to Ndiaye or Ballard to someone else as Sunderland will probably be a sell after the first games

        1. Bggz
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          1 month, 17 days ago

          I'm going Ndiaye when I WC out of my BB situation around GW5-6 but Le Fee is good too... depending on how both teams are going.

        2. Albrightondknight
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          1 month, 17 days ago

          Yeah saw 2 drafts here that use those kinda picks to future proof and the teams look good. I think I am set on this and a GW4 WC can be these kinda picks and Che players
          I really have my doubts on the GW 6 WC with the pool city fixture if they are both firing it would make a GW6 WC very difficult. That why I prefer GW6 FH
          As it stands I really want to keep Ballard long term Le Fee won’t be in the team for long. I will have a bench headache in 2, hopefully in 3 a triple City and pool save

    2. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Correct draft
      Lammens Verbruggen

      Mosquera Calafiori Ajer Ballard Shaw

      Mbeumbo Wirtz Semenyo Tzolis Le Fee

      Haaland Pedro DCL

    3. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Wirtz Foden Tzolis
      I wouldnt pick any of these too uncertain.

  10. Bggz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Nailed ratings GW1?

    Ips;
    Diop
    O'Shea
    Davis

    Cov:
    Thomas
    Kitching
    vEwijk

    Hull:
    Egan
    Hughes
    Giles

  11. Albrightondknight
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Have bothered looking at Hull
    There is more competition for the center back spots at Coventry that people think. I would definitely go VanEwing
    O’Shea probably most nailed for Ipswich but I ain’t an Ipswich expert.

  12. Dutchy
    • 8 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Rodon Wirtz or Muhamerovic Szob

  13. Jules-C
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Currently on Haaland and Ndiaye, but would Bruno and Isak maybe be a better option considering Haaland might not start?

    1. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Potentially, but Haaland can rock up and bag a hattie

  14. Ryan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    If Haaland were to only play 20mins in GW1 due to a lack of pre-season/building match fitness, would you still start the season with him in GW1?

    1. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Definitely not. If it’s pretty much certain that he will only play a few minutes in GW1 I would go Isak and Bruno and pivot back in GW3

      1. Ryan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Bruno could be a good make weight given their first two fixtures. I'd be open to that too I think. It would be pity to sell Isak prior to Ipswich (GW3) and Fulham (GW4) though.

    2. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Yeah I'd be happy with his brace

  15. Zoostation
    • 12 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Any feedback on this for BB in GW1?

    Kinsky Verbruggen

    Calafiori Gvardiol Shaw Mykolenko O’Shea

    Palmer Mbeumo Wirtz Ndiaye Gross

    Haaland Isak DCL

    1. The Tonberry
      • 2 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Team would look better if you did Palmer to Semenyo and use the 1.0 to upgrade Mykolenko to a 2nd Arsenal defender, or upgrade the two 4.5 defenders to 5.0 defenders.

      1. Jules-C
        1 month, 17 days ago

        I agree to this one!

      2. swervinho
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        This

    2. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      You got me thinking about Isak haha. Currently on JP - Donnarumma - Tarkowski, but could do Kinsky - Gvardiol - Isak as well

    3. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Thats a solid team for GW1 BB. Not sure I'd be 100% confident O'Shea starts and I don't think Mykolenko offers much at 4.5. I'd be wary about Gross minutes given they have a conference league playoff game prior to GW1 so just keep an eye on that.

  16. Ryan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Any thoughts on this no early chip team

    Kinsky Dubravka
    Calafiori, Gvardiol, Maguire, Mitchell, Van Ewijk
    Bruno, Mbeumo, Wirtz, M Sangare, Norgaard
    Haaland, J Pedro, DCL

    I figure the only change that could be made at this stage would be in downgrading Maguire and Wirtz to Shaw and Szoboszlai to free up 1m to upgrade M Sangare or Norgaard.

    1. swervinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Hard to fault. I’d leave Wirtz. Maguire to Shaw I’d prob do and bump up Norgard to 5.5 Gross or similar.

    2. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Sangare not nailed according to FPL Planet's Brentford correspondent.

      1. Ryan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        1 month, 16 days ago

        Thanks for the heads up

  17. Absolutely Muñozed
    • 1 Year
    1 month, 17 days ago

    anyone going without Arsenal defense in the start??

    1. swervinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      At least one

    2. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      I'm tempted to go without. Just have a feeling they may not be as solid given the defensive injuries. However in saying that, the alternatives at 5.5 aren't that expensive so maybe its still worth it.

      1. Absolutely Muñozed
        • 1 Year
        1 month, 17 days ago

        yes its either Arsenal defender or 4.5

    3. sozopol
      • 14 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      o/

  18. Dutchy
    • 8 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    BB1 Current Draft. Thoughts?

    Kinsky
    White Neco Shaw
    Bruno Mbuemo Szob Groß
    Haaland Pedro DCL

    Verbruggen Sangare Muharemovic Davis

    1. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Looks good. The DC ones on the bench may help going forward. Some different picks in the defence that are not template. But White may actually have less threats than Cala or Mos.

  19. Albrightondknight
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    For the first 2 weeks only

    1. Haaland and LeFee
    2. Isak and BrunoF

    1. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      utd do have two great fixtures but i'm thinking mbuemo

  20. Bavarian
    • 8 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Is porro worth the 0.5 over Van Hecke?

  21. royals forever
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 17 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Thoughts on this team

    Lammens Verbruggen
    Thomas Aina White Gvardiol Mitchell
    Semenyo Mbeumo Szoboszial Ndiaye Sangare
    Haaland Pedro Thiago

    Any ideas would be welcomed

    1. David Parkinson
      • 4 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      No Bruno so maybe Shaw in one of the 4.5 slots.

  22. Mid-Table Obscurity
    • 15 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Scenario: you’ve got 18.0 to spend on three midfielders. All that matters is gw1 points. All three play. Who do you go for?

    1. swervinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Tsolis Gross Le Fee

    2. Jules-C
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Ndiaye, Le Fee, Gross. Keep the change haha

    3. David Parkinson
      • 4 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      So 3 around 6? GroB, Le Fee and Ndiaye and you've half a mill change.

  23. Khalico
    • 11 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Any changes to this team, in mind to BB either GW1 or 2?

    Kinsky, Verbruggen
    VvD, Muharemovic, Ballard, Vuskovic, Thomas
    Ndiaye, Le Fee, Mbeumo, MGW, Semenyo
    Haaland, JP, DCL

  24. Carlin's Mrs
    • 7 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    BrunoF update as requested by The Knight..

    Michael has upped his training this last few days. Dumbbell curls have went up to 2.5kg from 1.5kg which is quite a weight for someone of his stature. He's coming along nicely. He has been practicing pens since his miss. I'll update more next week of how many minutes he will get against Hull.

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Thanks Obvious Dave, much obliged!

    2. Jaws
      • 12 Years
      1 month, 16 days ago

      Wedding season is over then I guess?

  25. Barnaby Wilde
    • 3 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Maatsen or Kayode?

  26. Barnaby Wilde
    • 3 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Best Coventry DF?

    1. David Parkinson
      • 4 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Milan van Ewijk.

      1. fantasyfog
        • 11 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Any stats behind this?

  27. pmletch
    • 11 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Please RMT, I have gone no Bruno which makes me uneasy but hoping to make up the points elsewhere.

    Verbruggen (Steele)
    Gabriel, VVD, Muharemović (van E, O’Shea)
    Semenyo, Mbeumo, Wirtz, Bruno G, BRE Sangare
    Haaland, JP (Walle Egeli)

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Sangare not nailed according to FPL Planet's Brentford correspondent.

      You need Mbeumo AND Cuhna to cover Bruno.

      1. The Hunt
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 17 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Possibly better to get Bruno to cover Bruno.

      2. Count of Monte Hristo
        • 13 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        This is a misconception, if going without Bruno you need the players you choose in his absence to outscore him regardless of what team they play for.

  28. George Agdgdgwngo
    • 17 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Thoughts on the options

    A. Ballard, Shaw, Mbeumo
    B. Calafiori, Maguire, Szoboszial
    C. Calafiori, Gvardiol, Ndiaye

    Bruno F also in the team

    1. fantasyfog
      • 11 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      A for me, not swayed by Arsenal just yet, C next best, lagging behind is C

      1. fantasyfog
        • 11 Years
        1 month, 17 days ago

        Wrong way around A C then B

    2. Count of Monte Hristo
      • 13 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      A

  29. The Tonberry
    • 2 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Really torn on whether to BB1 or BB2.

    This is my base squad with gaps to be filled depending on when I BB:

    Lammens Kinsky
    Calafiori Gvardiol x x x
    Semenyo Wirtz Mbeumo Szob x
    Haaland Pedro DCL

    Which is the best to go with?

    BB1 - White, Shaw, Gross, O'Shea
    BB2 - Maguire, Rodon, Le Fee, Van Ewijk

    1. Count of Monte Hristo
      • 13 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      Looking at both options, BB2 immediately jumps out as the better one.

  30. Count of Monte Hristo
    • 13 Years
    1 month, 17 days ago

    Looking at GW1 in isolation is there a 6.5 midfielder with a better fixture or higher ceiling than Le Fee @ Ipswich or Ndiaye (h) to Palace?

    Excluding Tzolis.

    1. yousunkmybattleship
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      1 month, 17 days ago

      No

    2. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 month, 16 days ago

      Possibly not.

      Maybe Dango vs Robertson but doesnt make sense to pick him over those players.

      1. Count of Monte Hristo
        • 13 Years
        1 month, 16 days ago

        Do you prefer Le Fee over Ndiaye?

        1. Holmes
          • 12 Years
          1 month, 16 days ago

          Le Fee

    3. The Tonberry
      • 2 Years
      1 month, 16 days ago

      Le Fee and Ndiaye are the best 6m options.

      As for which pick is better - if BB1 then Ndiaye, BB2 Le Fee

      1. Count of Monte Hristo
        • 13 Years
        1 month, 16 days ago

        Thanks mate

    4. 17th Time Lucky
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      1 month, 16 days ago

      Same fixture, but would KDH have a higher ceiling than Ndiaye? Everton don't win many pens, and even if they do, is it a job share now? (Two in preseason, one for Barry one for Ndiaye, both on the pitch both times)