Chip Strategy
15 September 2026 151 comments
FPLReactions FPLReactions
Share:

As the Fantasy Premier League (FPL) Gameweek 5 deadline approaches, plenty of managers will be considering whether now is the right time to activate their Wildcard.

Indeed, 18% of responders in our weekly chip poll are playing their Wildcard this week.

Fixture swings for Newcastle United, Fulham and Everton create some fresh opportunities, while several popular Manchester City, Chelsea, Liverpool and Brighton and Hove Albion picks could come under scrutiny.

So, is Gameweek 5 the right time to rebuild? We assess the pros and cons before putting together our latest Wildcard draft.


PROS

Aside from the usual benefits, such as building team value and removing underperforming picks, there are several reasons why Gameweek 5 could provide a good Wildcard window.

GOOD FIXTURES FOR NEWCASTLE, FULHAM + EVERTON

Newcastle head into Gameweek 5 after a heavy defeat, but fixtures can often breed form.

The Magpies now face two promoted sides in their next two matches, immediately bringing the likes of Lewis Hall (£5.2m), Malick Thiaw (£5.0m), Harvey Barnes (£6.0m) and Yoane Wissa (£6.2m) into the conversation.

Fulham, meanwhile, face all three promoted sides across their next four Gameweeks, as well as a unconvicing Manchester United backline.

Bernd Leno (£4.5m) could provide a route into the defence between the sticks, while Josh King (£5.5m) has impressed in the number 10 role. Gonzalo Garcia (£6.0m) could provide another option while spearheading the attack.

As for Everton, James Tarkowski (£6.1m) continues to justify his premium price tag season after season.

Further forward, Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall (£6.5m) has emerged as one of the Toffees’ standout attacking options. Thierno Barry (£5.6m) continues to lead the line and provides another rotation-risk-free route into their favourable fixtures.

All three newly promoted sides are to come in the next six Gameweeks.

REASSESS THE ARSENAL TRIPLE-UP

FPL Gameweek 5 Wildcard

We may not yet know the optimum Arsenal triple-up, but owning three players from arguably the best side in the league remains hugely appealing.

The Wildcard provides an opportunity to reassess exactly where those spots should go.

David Raya (£6.0m), Ezri Konsa (£4.5m) and Riccardo Calafiori (£5.8m) offer different routes into the defence, while Martin Odegaard (£6.7m) and Bukayo Saka (£9.5m) provide attacking options.

Rather than simply sticking with the Arsenal trio you started the season with, a Wildcard allows you to redistribute those valuable spots.

FIX THE MAN CITY PROBLEMS

FPL notes: Haaland's 90 mins, Foden subbed again + time for Guehi

Manchester City’s excellent Gameweek 3 fixture persuaded plenty of managers to load up on their assets.

Some of those picks have quickly developed into problems.

Phil Foden (£7.0m) is suspended for the upcoming round, Rayan Cherki (£7.8m) has had his minutes managed and Nico O’Reilly (£6.4m) may also leave owners questioning whether they want to retain multiple City players.

Wildcarding provides a clean escape route.

Managers can still retain the City assets they trust – like Erling Haaland (£15.5m) – while redistributing money tied up in the more questionable picks.

CHELSEA ATTACKING TRIPLE-UP TOO MUCH?

FPL notes: 264

Chelsea’s excellent start and recent fixtures encouraged plenty of managers to invest heavily in their attack.

Owning Joao Pedro (£7.8m), Cole Palmer (£9.7m) and Morgan Rogers (£7.7m) together may now feel excessive, however.

Pedro’s form makes him extremely difficult to overlook, which could turn the decision into Palmer versus Rogers.

A Wildcard provides the opportunity to reduce the triple-up and spread those funds across teams with stronger immediate fixtures.

You’d still fancy goals across these fixtures, and a double-up shows plenty of faith in that, but is three attackers excessive?

MOVE AWAY FROM (SOME) BRENTFORD, LIVERPOOL AND BRIGHTON ASSETS

Brentford have impressed during the opening weeks, but their medium-term schedule now becomes more challenging – especially so for their defenders:

Managers who invested heavily in the Bees can use the Wildcard to cash in and move towards teams with greater potential over the coming Gameweeks.

That becomes particularly useful for squads carrying several Brentford players rather than just one easy-to-bench asset.

Similarly, Liverpool and Brighton sit towards the bottom of our Fixture Ticker over the next six Gameweeks:

Brighton’s immediate meeting with Arsenal looks particularly difficult, while Liverpool’s schedule also reduces the appeal of loading up on their players.

Dominik Szoboszlai (£7.0m), in particular, could come under scrutiny for managers looking to free up a midfield position. Even Maxim De Cuyper (£4.8m) may have peaked. It’s Arsenal this week, then Kaoru Mitoma (£5.9m) may return after the international break.

The Wildcard offers an easy route away from both teams without requiring several individual transfers.

TARGET FOREST FOR COVENTRY + NICE BRIGHTON ROTATION

Keeping one Brighton player, say Pascal Gross (£5.6m), may still be a goer.

Nottingham Forest don’t necessarily boast the best long-term schedule, but their immediate match is difficult to ignore – and their fixtures rotate fairly nicely with those of the Seagulls:

Daniel Munoz (£5.4m) and Neco Williams (£5.0m) come into consideration, combining clean-sheet potential with attacking threat. Morgan Gibbs-White (£7.9m) offers penalties and creativity further forward.


CONS

There are, however, good reasons to resist hitting the Wildcard button.

ARE NEWCASTLE AND FULHAM ACTUALLY GOOD ENOUGH?

FPL notes: Iraola on Szoboszlai pen + Wissa back to his best 1

Fixtures may bring form, but they don’t guarantee it.

Newcastle arrive at this favourable run after a poor result and haven’t completely convinced. Loading up on their players because two promoted sides await could therefore backfire.

Fulham present a similar dilemma. Their schedule looks excellent, but their performances haven’t necessarily done enough to demand heavy investment.

A Wildcard should ideally build a squad for several Gameweeks rather than simply chase attractive colours on the Fixture Ticker.

CONSIDER THE GAMEWEEK 5 FREE HIT

FPL Gameweek 5 early Scout Picks: Forest triple-up

Gameweek 5 sees Arsenal away at Premier League top scorers Brighton. Chelsea, meanwhile, are away at a Brentford side that lost only three home games in 2025/26.

If you’d like to hold players from Brighton, Arsenal and Chelsea longer term, but want to tap into more favourable fixtures this weekend, there’s always the Gameweek 5 Free Hit to consider.

Nottingham Forest, Leeds United, Everton and Newcastle United are clubs you might not want to go big on longer term. All of them, however, have favourable home fixtures in Gameweek 5.

Manchester United, too, have Fulham (porous until last Saturday!), before some trickier tests from Gameweeks 6-12. One last dance with Bruno Fernandes (£12.0m)?

WHY NOT WAIT UNTIL THE INTERNATIONAL BREAK?

World Cup Fantasy: Kane haul saves England, two Gordon assists

Perhaps the strongest argument against a Gameweek 5 Wildcard is what comes immediately afterwards.

A three-week international break separates Gameweeks 5 and 6.

That creates plenty of time for injuries, fitness issues and other problems to emerge. Players will also return from international duty with differing workloads.

Waiting one more Gameweek would give managers considerably more information before committing to a squad designed for the medium and long term.

There is an alternative, of course. Managers who Wildcard now can carry free transfers into Gameweek 6 and use them to address any problems that emerge during the break.

But activating now still carries the risk that we’re rebuilding our squads one week too early.


GAMEWEEK 5: WILDCARD DRAFT

Our Arsenal triple-up consists of David Raya, Ezri Konsa and Bukayo Saka, giving us a good balance between defence and attack. Saka has already scored three goals this season, while his penalty-taking duties – especially with Viktor Gyokeres peripheral – add to his appeal.

Tarik Muharemović (£5.0m) – yet to blank – also makes the cut, alongside Malick Thiaw for some Newcastle coverage. Our budget does stretch to Lewis Hall. James Tarkowski is an easy inclusion thanks to his consistency and upcoming fixtures, while John Egan (£4.1m) is our budget pick of choice after showing excellent DefCon reliability.

In midfield, great short-term fixtures and no European football give Morgan Gibbs-White an edge. We’ve opted for Morgan Rogers over Cole Palmer, with the underlying data looking very positive so far and the significant savings helping elsewhere.

An Everton attacking double-up of Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall and Thierno Barry could also work wonders, with two promoted sides up next. They’re both playable in five of the next six Gameweeks; bear in mind that Chelsea haven’t kept a Premier League clean sheet since January! All three Toffees would be benched in Gameweek 8, away at Arsenal.

Josh King has impressed and provides a cheap route into the Fulham attack ahead of their kind schedule, although you could equally just ‘set and forget’ Pascal Gross as the budget midfield option.

Up front, Joao Pedro completes our Chelsea attacking double-up. He has comfortably produced the best FPL output of their main attacking options so far. Erling Haaland also makes the cut and remains our premium forward of choice.


151 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. el polako
    • 9 Years
    3 hours, 40 mins ago

    What to do with NOR?
    Already absorbed one price drop on him.

    Keep the faith or move on to Munoz\Vuskovic\Hall ?

    1. Baines on Toast...
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 hours, 39 mins ago

      he is not first choice

    2. golfboy
      • 9 Years
      2 hours, 39 mins ago

      keep for SUN

    3. Esraj
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 38 mins ago

      Too expensive to sit on the bench. Move to Munoz.

    4. el polako
      • 9 Years
      2 hours, 19 mins ago

      Cheers gents.
      The only thins that’s stopping me for selling without hesitation is the fact that prior to his injury he was 1st choice so not sure if United game was only easing him in pos injury or sign that he’s no longer favoured.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 hours, 15 mins ago

        The problem is Enzo Fernandez. He was not signed while O'Reilly was starting and he takes one of those midfield spots.

        If we're thinking about the team for this weekend, I think there could be a place for O'Reilly but it's probably part of the front 4 if at all.

        I'm thinking it will be:

        Haaland
        XX Cherki Semenyo
        Anderson Enzo
        Gvardiol Guehi Dias Nunes
        Donnarumma

        That XX slot is where O'Reilly could be picked or they could end up going with Ndiaye. I dunno. My instinct is that he doesn't start.

        1. el polako
          • 9 Years
          2 hours, 12 mins ago

          Valid points.
          I can also see the world in which Cherki goes back to the bench, Enzo is love to nr10 role and NOR is playing alongside Elliot Anderson.

          Decisions, decisions

          1. Gazwaz80
            • 6 Years
            2 hours ago

            Cherki’s spot is a little more safe now Foden has been sidelined for 2 matches..

  2. Esraj
    • 10 Years
    3 hours, 29 mins ago

    Fpl statistico seems to be frozen. Are their any alternative sites? TIA.

    1. Esraj
      • 10 Years
      3 hours, 29 mins ago

      *there

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 hours, 10 mins ago

      Check out all the new tools on this site.

      Many freely available.

  3. rjcv177
    • 11 Years
    3 hours, 27 mins ago

    Foden ownher here (yes, dont ask)

    Mids are palmer, Rogers, mbeumo, foden, ode

    Should i move to gross or 2ft to get to gibs-white?

  4. Karan_G14
    • 10 Years
    3 hours, 26 mins ago

    Bench one out of these?

    A) Konsa (bha)
    B) Muharemovic (CRY)
    C) Hall (HUL)

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      3 hours, 24 mins ago

      C

    2. Old Wulfrunian
      • 9 Years
      3 hours, 23 mins ago

      I have all of them and i will bench Konsa.Also own Calafiori.

    3. Esraj
      • 10 Years
      3 hours, 20 mins ago

      Hall

    4. el polako
      • 9 Years
      3 hours, 11 mins ago

      Don’t bench Leeds big man.
      He’s been great for me so far.

  5. BusbySwede
    • 9 Years
    3 hours, 23 mins ago

    Thoughts on this now with Elanga injured?

    Verbruggen
    Calafiori, Gvardiol, Hall
    Palmer, Rogers, MGW, Elanga
    Haaland, Pedro, Wissa

    Tzolakis, De Cuyper, Sangare, Egan

    Have 2FT, 0.8m itb.
    Would you sell De Cuyper for Williams?
    Egan to Konsa?
    Sell Elanga now for Gross/Schade/King or keep and put on the bench until gw6 and see how everything looks after the IB?

    1. Khalico
      • 11 Years
      2 hours, 29 mins ago

      Elanga to Schade

    2. Old Wulfrunian
      • 9 Years
      2 hours, 23 mins ago

      Elanga to King.Maybe Barnes?

  6. royals forever
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 17 Years
    3 hours, 22 mins ago

    Would Foden > KDH/Stach be enough for this team for this GW or does it need an early WC instead

    Kinsky Dubravka
    Calaflori De Cuyper Ajer Gvardiol Thomas
    Fernandes Foden Mbeumo Szoboszial Slater
    Pedro Haaland DCL

    1 FT 0 ITB

    Any ideas would be appreciated and welcomed

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      3 hours, 13 mins ago

      Maybe you can get away with Foden > KDH for this week. But WC is coming for sure.

  7. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    3 hours, 14 mins ago

    Considering WC this week for Forest.

    Kinsky 4.0
    Calafiori Konsa Muharemovic Munoz Thomas
    Palmer Saka Gibbs-White Mbeumo Gross
    Haaland Pedro 4.5m

    I'm 1m overbudget with this team.

    Mbeumo seems the obvious place to downgrade but I really like him actually and think he's slept on with a great fixture this week. Where would you find the money? Saw Saka's stats are really strong so not liking losing him.

    I have a few options if I do decide to WC:

    A) Gross > Yalcouye
    B) Mbeumo > Schade
    C) Palmer > Rogers

    I'm not really liking any. I want to keep the attack as is. Do I sack Munoz? I really like the Forest fixtures starting this week and this would be the week to WC him in.

    1. el polako
      • 9 Years
      2 hours, 17 mins ago

      Mbuemo -> Enzo?

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        1 hour, 16 mins ago

        Yes it's an option. But as I said I really like Mbeumo. Loathe to sell him now vs Fulham.

    2. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      2 hours, 1 min ago

      It would be C for me. I feel Pedro is very captainable if you want a Chelsea attacker, and I know Palmer has pedigree and pens, but underlying numbers wise he doesn’t seem to be outperforming Rogers by £2m. Not only that, but watching Chelsea, Palmer feels more the creator and Rogers and Pedro the finishers, especially as Rogers is so greedy with taking shots on, so I expect Rogers and Pedro to get more goals and Palmer to get more assists. For Rogers’ goal at the weekend, I imagine most players would pass to Palmer who was in a great central position closer to goal, but Rogers held on to the ball to go for the shot himself. Also, I say Palmer is on pens. Alonso was cryptic at the start of the season and Palmer actually hasn’t taken a pen with Pedro on the pitch yet. I think Palmer likely will keep them, but Pedro taking them off him is not completely impossible…

      I know this comes in the wake of last week when Palmer got one assist and Rogers and Pedro scored, but I was considering all this things last week when I was deciding whether to buy and triple captain Palmer or buy Rogers and captain Pedro. I decided to go with pens and pedigree and I got burned for it. I think the Hull game is an extra arrow in the quiver of the anti-Palmer argument, not the start of it.

      I own Palmer and will be WCing soon. I’ll probably be picking Rogers over Palmer

      1. Mr Turnip 1
        • 1 Year
        2 hours, 1 min ago

        I certainly wouldn’t do A or B, they both feel like massive downgrades

      2. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        1 hour, 52 mins ago

        Thanks. Well reasoned.

        I'm probably gonna hold off on WC one more week. I don't think Saka vs bha is quite worth hitting the button this week. If I go the Palmer > Rogers route I can afford this WC next week over the IB so will likely hit the button next week.

        Likely to just do NOR > Munoz this week.

        1. Mr Turnip 1
          • 1 Year
          1 hour, 46 mins ago

          Probably sensible. Don’t know how many FTs you have, but given I have only 1 I feel like I have to hold WC till next week too. IB can throw up all sorts of problems, though also red herrings. I’ll have to try not to get too spooked if some players are “injured” again and have to withdraw from international duty…

          1. el polako
            • 9 Years
            1 hour, 41 mins ago

            I thinks it’s called „gunners injury”.

  8. space mercenary
    • 6 Years
    2 hours, 58 mins ago

    Jayden Bogle Performance Metric (Per 90 Mins)

    2026-27 Season. | 2025-26 Season
    Shots. 1.19 | 0.42
    Shots in the Box. 1.19 | 0.32
    Shots on Target. 1.19 | 0.13
    xG. 0.37 | 0.06
    xA. 0.04 | 0.06
    xGI. 0.41 | 0.12

    Small sample size but could be great value. As with Calafiori, the early subs only help to preserve clean sheet points as defcon is not expected.

    1. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      1 hour, 57 mins ago

      Ludicrous. I watched the highlights from Leeds v Newcastle and it felt like he was playing as a CF half the time. WVA was singing Bogle’s praises at the start of the season and I didn’t believe him. How foolish I was. Tbf he was very lucky to be given the goal yesterday. I feel like surely it should have been Calvert-Lewin’s, but the fact he was going for a header in the centre of the box was encouraging. Still, he could be a fantastic pick at 4.5. Don’t know what to do though because Muharemovic seems brilliant too. Surely double Leeds defence can’t be the way to go?…

      1. space mercenary
        • 6 Years
        1 hour, 48 mins ago

        Agreed, the double up does feel excessive, but either of those could haul for different reasons. If the £0.5m is needed Bogle is good option.

  9. MMN
    • 12 Years
    2 hours, 53 mins ago

    1 FT 2.7m in the bank. Thoughts on best move?

    A) Szobo > MGW
    B) Palmer > Bruno
    C) Save FT

    Kinsky
    Cali - Hall - Muharamovic
    Palmer - Rogers - Odegard - Szobo
    Haaland - DCL - JP

    4m - Konsa - Thomas - Gomez

    1. space mercenary
      • 6 Years
      1 hour, 58 mins ago

      Reply fail!
      ...A

    2. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      1 hour, 55 mins ago

      Roll before IB

  10. space mercenary
    • 6 Years
    2 hours, 51 mins ago

    A

    1. Mr Turnip 1
      • 1 Year
      1 hour, 55 mins ago

      H

  11. New article
  12. Verbruggen >Kinsky worth a transfer?

  13. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    20 mins ago

    With no NFO, LEE, EVE or NEW players in my team, and not really wanting them long term, has anyone considered FH this week?

    For example:

    Sels
    Tarkowski, Gvardiol, Muharemovic
    Palmer, MGW, KDH, Cherki
    Haaland, DCL, Wissa

    4.0, Hall, Konsa 4.5
    Bank 0.2m