634x258 Injuries
19 October 2015 948 comments
James Barnes James Barnes
Share:

Daniel Sturridge misses Liverpool’s trip to Tottenham with a minor knee knock. Southampton and Bournemouth have concerns over their first-choice keepers, whilst Samir Nasri’s hamstring problem adds to City’s injury list…

Arsenal
Gabriel and David Ospina both missed Arsenal’s trip to Watford due to illness and a shoulder problem respectively.

Earlier today, Arsene Wenger has confirmed the defender is available for their midweek Champions League showdown with Bayern, though Ospina has been ruled out again.

Bournemouth
Artur Boruc is scheduled for a scan after sustaining a thigh injury during the warm-up at Manchester City. Cherries boss Eddie Howe also revealed that Marc Pugh could only make the bench due to injury:

“Artur will have a scan and we’ll wait to see the extent of it. We hope, because he was pulled out before the game, that it is not serious damage but we’ll wait until the results. He has been away with Poland so we haven’t seen a great deal of him over the past two weeks and for him to pick up that injury in the warm-up, it’s another one we couldn’t really control but we’ll hopefully get him back into action very quickly…In terms of Marc Pugh missing out, he hadn’t trained in the international break because of a rib injury. In a sense, my team selection was forced upon me.”


Chelsea
Pedro and Loic Remy have both been ruled out of Chelsea’s Champions League clash with Dynamo Kiev on Wednesday evening due to minor injuries. Earlier today, Jose Mourinho went on to say:

“We have other options and it would be big risk to play them.”


Leicester City
Claudio Ranieri expects Leonardo Ulloa to be fit for next Gameweek after missing Leicester’s trip to Southampton with a minor thigh problem.

Liverpool
Daniel Sturridge was sidelined for Liverpool’s trip to Tottenham after picking up a minor injury in training. Jurgen Klopp shed further light on Sturridge’s absence in his post-match presser, saying that he suffered nothing more serious than swelling in his knee. The Reds’ newly installed boss is hopeful that the ex-Chelsea forward will be available for selection when the Merseysiders host Rubin Kazan on Thursday, whilst Christian Benteke is also expected to return:

“We had a bad week with injuries. The best news is it’s not a serious thing with Daniel. But in a week like this with two ACL, we could not risk it. Daniel had a one-on-one situation with Jordon Ibe in training; I didn’t see it but after he said he had a little pain in a muscle. We made a diagnosis and screened him to be sure – we can see a little bit of swelling but nothing really serious. So we have to see. I hope he’s ready to play on Thursday…Danny Ings needs time, obviously, but Benteke could be back for Kazan or Southampton.”


Manchester City
Having entered the fray at the 62-minute mark against Bournemouth, Samir Nasri was forced to play through a hamstring problem at the Etihad in light of Man City using their full complement of substitutes. Manuel Pellegrini admitted that the French playmaker is now a serious doubt for the Sky Blues’ home tie against Sevilla on Wednesday:

“Nasri had a problem with his hamstring. I don’t know because I didn’t talk with the doctor yet but I think it will be very difficult for him [to play on Wednesday]. Unfortunately we knew that he was feeling something after we made the third change, so if not maybe I can change him before. He didn’t run too much, he stayed in the middle, so we’ll see in the next day what happens with him.”

Yaya Toure was passed fit for the Cherries’ visit but was hauled off at the break. Pellegrini explained that he didn’t want to risk affording the Ivorian midfielder further minutes given his recent niggling injuries and inactivity over the international break:

“It was not thinking about Sevilla, it was thinking about Yaya. He just played 45 minutes in the Champions League before he got in an injury. In the first ten days of the international break he did nothing so I thought 45 minutes was enough. It was not an important injury but one which prevented him from playing games.”


Southampton
Maarten Stekelenburg picked up a back injury during Saints’ Friday’s training session, paving the way for Kelvin Davis to earn his first league start of the campaign. Ronald Koeman revealed “we will have to wait a couple of days” before knowing whether his first-choice stopper will be available for the weekend trip to Liverpool.

Sunderland
Duncan Watmore sat out Sunderland’s road tie against West Bromwich Albion with a minor hamstring complaint. Jack Rodwell is also a major concern ahead of the Tyne-Wear derby as he struggles to shake off a persistent ankle knock.

Tottenham Hotspur
Nacer Chadli was withdrawn after 11 minutes of Spurs’ home tie against Liverpool after damaging his ankle. After the match, Mauricio Pochettino suggested that the Belgian winger might’ve suffered an ankle ligament injury:

“We need to assess tomorrow and after tomorrow we will know more. Maybe it’s a problem in his ankle ligaments but we hope it is not a big, big issue. After the game it was painful and in the next 24 or 48 hours we will be able to see better how the injury is.”


948 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. EWH2020
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Current Squad:

    Schmeichel, Hennessey
    Azpi, Sagna, Francis, Coates, Targett
    Sanchez, Mahrez, De Bruyne, Payet, Sinclair
    Pelle, Vardy, Ighalo

    My defense is a shambles, had a shocking game week!
    I have already cost myself -4pts. Is it worth WC this lot? Or save it?

    1. Judas
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      save as your mids and attack are almostst perfect

    2. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Save

      No more hits

      How much money you have in the bank?

      1. EWH2020
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks. I have £7.2m in the bank!

        1. Heels_Over_Head
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Thought so.

          Next week, and not before, drop Coates for Smelling or Darmian

          Sorted

    3. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      You'd be mad to WC this team! It's not that bad! in 2GWs you can make this look pretty again.

      7 of your forward 8 are from my WC team last week, so you are fine.

      Defence ain't the worst either. I would leave this team if you've already taken a hit -
      Just play Azpi, Sagna & Francis (Francis not ideal but at least he is going to get you 90 mins).

      Next GW look at shifting Coates

    4. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I think this dude's a hustler 😉

      1. Heels_Over_Head
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Ha haaaaaaaaaa

  2. Tshelby
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    which team will hold the most cleanies next 5 games
    man City, Man u, Tot, Sot, WBA?

    1. Whats the Huth
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Swans

      1. Tshelby
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        With games against chelsea and arsenal an WHU?

        1. ZombieEaten
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Swansea has avl, ARS, nor, BOU, liv

          1. Tshelby
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            Ooops looked at Tot.. sorry

    2. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Manure

    3. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Southampton.

    4. Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Southampton

      1. Boris Bodega
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        and defo not WBA looking at their fixtures....

      2. Tshelby
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Bert or Van dijk then?

        1. Boris Bodega
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          I went with Fonte, if that helps.

          Probably doesn't.

    5. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Man Utd

    6. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      MCY: mun -36 NOR 494 avl 440 LIV 353 SOT 343
      MUN: MCI 36 cpl 118 WBA 431 wat 156 lei 121
      TOT: bou 126 AVL 365 ars -255 WHM 195 CHE -70
      SOT: liv -89 BOU 232 sun 218 STO 239 mci -343
      WBA: nor -56 LEI 24 mun -431 ARS -289 whm -155

      ARS: EVE 370 swa 137 TOT 255 wba 289 nor 273

      1. Tshelby
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        All ready got Bellerin but Manu look best out of those?

        Cheers!

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Errr - no. Citeh, then Saints.

          1. ZombieEaten
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            What do you think to SWA or EVE potential for CS in next 5?

            1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              SWA: avl 151 ARS -137 nor 51 BOU 97 liv -147

              Slim pickings?

              1. ZombieEaten
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 10 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Wow, surprising. Suprised not more differential between SWA and avl, nor and BOU. I will see how SWA they do today and decide. Perhaps Toby or Bertrand decision can wait as I can play this GW10:

                Cech
                Bellerin, Nyom, Dawson (Kolarov, Francis)

          2. Whats the Huth
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            What about Everton doos? Worth getting Coleman in?

            1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              EVE: ars -370 SUN 219 whm -65 AVL 259 bou 11

              1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Maybe two?

                1. Whats the Huth
                  • 10 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  Two??

              2. Whats the Huth
                • 10 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Thanks. Looks like Coleman wouldn't be a good option after all

                1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 16 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  Well, clean sheets are an art, not a science. But Everton's numbers have fallen a bit.

                  I think that Gareth may be a bit knackered ...

      2. Jazz!
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Doos, can I see your numbers for Stoke (against Watford), please?

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          STK: WAT 148

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            - but not updated until tomorrow.

            1. Jazz!
              • 10 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              Thanks

      3. Colonel Klink
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        It's really not looking good for West Brom.

    7. ZombieEaten
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      3 potential each in next 5 for SWA, SOT, EVE

    8. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Spurs

    9. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Just get one defender from each team and play 5 at the back;

      Kompany, Smalling, Dier, Berty, Dawson

      1. Tshelby
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Not to keen to put all my money in mij defense..

    10. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Swans, WBA.

  3. Whats the Huth
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    So. Is pedro out of the weekend game also? That means hazard will play this weekend?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Only out midweek so far.

      1. Whats the Huth
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Don't want to sell hazard this week if I don't have to. He's my KDB or yaya enabler. But not wanting city cover before the Derby.

  4. sagheerpak
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Friends,
    Currently at 28k. Can i fancy to move top.....

    1. Burger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Surprised you're not top already, how amazing you are..

  5. Judas
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    It´s only Monday and I already have a headache from my transfer decision this week, opinions?

    A: Ayew ---> Wijnaldum
    B: 5th Mid Westwood ---> Wijnaldum (rotate with Ighalo, Ayew, Mahrez)
    C: Ighalo ---> Costa
    D: Ighalo ---> Bony
    E: A or B ---> Payet

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      CL could easily change that.

      1. Judas
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        true. as could tonights game.

        thought on this now though?

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          B probably with Payet. Westwood is useless.

    2. DGW Sane TC Fail....
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      A No
      B with Payet
      C No
      D can wait for Norwich if money isn't a problem
      E see B

    3. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      B or D

      Ayew for Bournemouth and Villa matches!

      Prefer Payet.

      1. Judas
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        yeah I do like ayew for those games

        but with Payet, I would end up paying SOO much more than everyone else.
        For a player who may not continue this form

        Missed the boat comes to mind

        1. DGW Sane TC Fail....
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Save transfer?

  6. DGW Sane TC Fail....
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    repost

    Mahrez Vs Vardy for captain. How do people see the game going? Is it likely Palace will sit back and play mostly on the counter or will they take the game to Ranieri's men?

    1. Judas
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      cant captain mahrez due to the uncertainy of his starting place

      1. Jazz!
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        He will start next game.

      2. DGW Sane TC Fail....
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        He's going to start ..Changed the game at the weekend.

      3. Reedy
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        I don't see it that way. I'd worry more about Vardy being rotated as Ulloa and Kramaric haven't seen much action yet. Vardy's form is no safeguard - look at Mahrez's form before he was tinkered with.

    2. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Mahrez

    3. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I'm doing Mahrez (c), Vardy (VC) personally.

      Pens, BAPS, Set pieces, Form, Fixture, Extra point for goal. He'll want to start again with a bang

      1. DGW Sane TC Fail....
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        If Palace sit back i can see a good chance of a penalty and Mahrez coming out on top. If they take the game to them i see Vardy as the better option. Not sure how they will play 🙁

      2. Reedy
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        I was thinking this but if Vardy comes into play it means Mahrez hasn't featured for whatever reason, which will surely impact upon the Foxes' attack.

        Mahrez(C) Sanchez(vc) is where I'm at, currently.

        1. Reedy
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          By comes into play I mean becomes captain in your team...I didn't word that well.

          1. DGW Sane TC Fail....
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            i keep switching between Mahrez and Sanchez with Ayew popping his head through the door ever now and then saying "What about me"

            1. Reedy
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              🙂 Thankfully I don't have him to contend with too...though I kind of wish I did.

  7. I am 42
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    with regards to http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/10/18/scout-notes-gameweek-9-saturday-4/?hc_page=12#hc_comment_11575562

    1) kick off, 00:01 to 01:00 = 1 min (current fpl rule)
    if player got injured after 10 seconds, player gets 1 min (00:10)
    sub gets 90 mins (00:11 to 90:00)

    2) injury time(91 min) sub
    player gets 90 mins, sub gets 1 min

    3) 59:30 min sub
    player gets 60 mins, sub gets 31 mins

    thus player + sub minutes should be equal to 91 mins
    FPL should reconsider this, +1 if you agree

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Incorrect.

      0 - 57.59 gets rounded up.
      58.01 - 59.59 = 59

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Sub would get 89 in 1)
        Sub needs to get 1 minute in 2) so correct.

        1. I am 42
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          if (2) is correct, then player + sub should always be 91 min

          if 00.01 to 01.00 = 1 min, then 01.01 to 02.00 = 2 min
          89.01 to final whistle = 90 min

          this will make it more consistent and fair
          they should reconsider this and change the rules next season

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            2 is correct because the sub needs to register a minute for an appearance point.
            This only happens to subs after normal time in the 2nd half.

            89.01 - 89.59 can either be 89 or 90, it really isn't important for FPL but 89 is more correct in my eyes.

            1. I am 42
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              its not important but the game should be as fair and as consistent as possible

              the same rule should apply under ALL circumstances and condition

              its unfair to change now, but hope they will consider for next season

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                The game says a CS is 60 full minutes, no round up rubbish.
                They won't be changing it, it's very clear for 99% of us.

        2. I am 42
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          my guess for current arrangement

          00.01 to 01.59 = 1 min
          02.00 to 02.59 = 2 min
          89.00 to 89.59 = 89 min

          2 inconsistent factor
          1) 00.01 to 01.59 = 1 min
          2) sub during injury time?

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            1.01 - 1.59 is 2 minutes for FPL.
            Only the numbers of 60 and 90 have any significance in FPL hence they full be completed in full or they get rounded down.

            1. I am 42
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              if 1.01 - 1.59 is 2 minutes for FPL
              then 59.01 - 59.59 should be 60 minutes for FPL

              consistent 😀

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Rubbish and you know it.

    2. Granville
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      And of course if the sub gets subbed you have more rounding errors.

    3. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Lets face it, the only minutes that matter are 1 and 60.

      As long as any moment on the pitch is counted as at least 1 minute and anything above 59:59 is counted as at least 60 minutes then the system works.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Easy explanation.

      2. I am 42
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        im facing it

        as i mentioned, its unfair to change now, but hope they will consider for next season

        it might be the difference between 1st and 2nd in the world

        of cos its not me

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          But a change isn't required - the system works as it is.

          To qualify for an appearance point you only need to be on the pitch a second, therefore 0:01 is rounded up to 1 minute.

          To qualify for a clean sheet you need to be on the pitch a minimum of 60 minutes, therefore 59:59 is rounded down to 59 minutes.

          I'm not trying to be a pain, I genuinely don't see the issue - the calculations match the rule set.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            Have to accept that some people don't get it even when you post it as clearly as you have above.

            1. I am 42
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              to be fair, i get every single point

              is just that you dont, in terms of logical thinking

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                I do but only 1, 60 and 90 to a lesser point count.
                The rule says 60 full minutes needed for a CS and 2 appearance points.

                1. I am 42
                  • 12 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  if you do understand my point

                  then special condition should not be applied to 1, 60 and 90 min

                  every min should be equal

                  be it 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 60 min, 61 min, 89 min, 90 min

                  1. TorresMagic™
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 16 Years
                    10 years, 1 month ago

                    Rounding down is perfect except for 0.01 to 0.59.
                    That's the main issue.
                    That's why they put FULL in the rules regarding time.

          2. I am 42
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            i see your point, as in the current rules

            but you dont see mine, as in you feel its redundant

            i just feel the application of condition should be consistent

            ie round up, all will round up

            1. GreenWindmill
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              I guess my problem with your proposal is that it constitutes an actual rule change. Under your system the wording of the rules would have to say that in order to record a clean sheet a player must be on the pitch at least 59 minutes (at which point people would complain when someone was subbed off at 58:42)

              1. I am 42
                • 12 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                there is no need to change the rules

                kick off to 01:00 = 1 min
                58:01 to 59:00 = 59 mins
                59:01 to 60:00 = 60 mins
                89:01 to final whistle = 90 mins

                1. TorresMagic™
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 16 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  😆

                2. GreenWindmill
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  But that isn't what the rules say!

                  "For playing up to 60 minutes: 1"
                  "For playing 60 minutes or more: 2"
                  "A clean sheet is awarded for not conceding a goal whilst on the pitch and playing at least 60 minutes."

                  Your suggestion directly contradicts the "playing 60 minutes or more" and "playing at least 60 minutes" statements.

                  1. I am 42
                    • 12 Years
                    10 years, 1 month ago

                    let me think of a better way to illustrate my point/view

                    cheers

                    1. TorresMagic™
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 16 Years
                      10 years, 1 month ago

                      We understand your thinking.

                      "For playing up to 60 minutes: 1"
                      "For playing 60 minutes or more: 2" makes it clear.

                    2. GreenWindmill
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      10 years, 1 month ago

                      It's not that I don't get what you're saying, I just fundamentally disagree with it.

                      As per the wording of the rules above:

                      0:00 minutes played = 0 points
                      0:01-59:59 minutes played = 1 appearance point
                      60:00+ minutes played = 2 appearance points and qualification for a clean sheet

                      The current system awards points in exactly this manner. There's no disparity between the rules and the points awarded.

                      Your system would see a player playing 59:01 minutes get 2 appearance points and a clean sheet despite not "playing at least 60 minutes". There would be consistency in terms of rounding but a massive problem in terms of awarding points - is that really an improvement?

                  2. Pasqualinho
                    • 16 Years
                    10 years, 1 month ago

                    Fuzzy's beef wasn't with the lack of Cedric CS, though - it was more with the Yoshida award of 31 mins. it would have had more impact if Player 1 goes after after 30 mins 59 secs and replaced by Player 2, for example. In this case player 1 gets credited with 30 mins, Player 2 with 60. Player 2 gets 2 appearance points despite only appearing for just over 59 mins.

                    1. TorresMagic™
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 16 Years
                      10 years, 1 month ago

                      That's not even true. 31 and 59 would be the numbers.

                      1. Pasqualinho
                        • 16 Years
                        10 years, 1 month ago

                        It is true. The Cedric sub was at 59.48 - Cedric was credited 59 mins, Yoshida 31. Yoshida was rounded up.

                      2. TorresMagic™
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 16 Years
                        10 years, 1 month ago

                        They can only share 90 minutes so common sense prevails. Subs after normal time share 91 mins.

                    2. GreenWindmill
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      10 years, 1 month ago

                      I'm not arguing with Fuzzy - this seems to be a different kettle of fish 🙂

                      Although I'd be interested to see an actual example of the 30/60 rather than 60/30 in practice - I suspect they may cater for that situation to ensure the rules are adhered to.

                    3. Reedy
                      • 15 Years
                      10 years, 1 month ago

                      Yes, but that wouldn't happen. In that case the sub is the player approaching the significant 60 minute boundary, so his minutes would be rounded down and he would not be credited with a clean-sheet; so there's no discrepancy.

            2. Reedy
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              It is consistent though - they always round down at the significant boundary, 60 minutes.

              And the arrow of time doesn't matter - if a player goes off on ~30 minutes and the sub comes on for ~60, then it comes down to whether or not the player at the 60 minute boundary actually crossed it or not. If he has 60.00+ minutes he gets the cleansheet.

  8. Dynamic Duos
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    OK general consensus Mason or Alli?

    1. Judas
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      in fantasy terms, neither

      1. Dynamic Duos
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        5th mid, got to better than Westwood, Surman etc

    2. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Both rotation risk when squad is fully fit

    3. And we all have legs
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Definitely not Mason.

    4. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      None. Sorry!

  9. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Speaking as a Hammer, I am praying that Pedro is fit for next week end ... 🙂

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Lol. And here's to praying Terry and Ivanovic are fit too (Sakho own here)

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Not Ivanovic, mate.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Not Impressed by Baba?

          1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            No.

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 11 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              Interesting ....maybe Villa are just shite

      2. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Terry is fit and was good against Villa

        1. internal error
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          but villa are rubbish. Lovren could look good against Villa

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            😆

    2. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      He isn't as bad as you say he is...

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        OK.

      2. Somalion
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Noble of him to join a side as poor as Chelsea.

    3. Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Well I transferred out Sakho this week, so he is guaranteed at least 2 goals judging by my transfers out so far this season. 🙂

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        I'll be sure to tell him!!! 😆

      2. Debauchy
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Join the club Boris . The latest in a succession of fails -- Sterling out for KDB last week

        1. Boris Bodega
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Shall we compare horror stories?

          Mane out for Sanchez after GW 3, Mane scores 21 points in the next 3 week, Sanchez scores 8.

          Sanchez out for Payet in GW 7 just before he scores a hat trick.

          1. Debauchy
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            You and me both Boris !

            Also did somebody to Rondon ( someone in the know was punting him ) Was injured , took a hit to bring in Berahino . Rondon started , Bera off at half time.

            Created my own horror story though. A Berahino brace this weekend , will go a long way though

      3. Pochecinno
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Praying your transfer voodoo continues

        1. Debauchy
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Finally , Sanchez in this week . Take that !

    4. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      and Jose is still in charge ?

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Aye.

        1. internal error
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          I cant see anything worse than a draw for your guys

    5. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Leaning towards a win for you guys , damn well hope so.
      Forced myself to watch the Chelsea game on the weekend ( wondering about a Costa move) They are still terrible

    6. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      May the force not be with Peron

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Pedro was the worst player on the pitch against Villa....he is a Chicharito , not a Hazard

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          I agree with you.

          Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            I am actually happy we bought Pedro as it has given Wilian a boost....he has been a delite to watch

            1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              I would argue that he always has been ... 🙂

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 11 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Boost in terms of scoring goals and assisting goals ...

            2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              I would also say that you have been your most awful when he hasn't played ...

              1. Eden Hazardous
                • 11 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Might well be the case provided he plays RW as he was crap in the hole

                1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 16 Years
                  10 years, 1 month ago

                  He is not strong enough for that role ...

                  1. Eden Hazardous
                    • 11 Years
                    10 years, 1 month ago

                    Nobody in Chelsea is sadly 🙁

            3. Debauchy
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              small mercies

            4. Boris Bodega
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              I have honestly never enjoyed watching Chelsea play as much as I have so far this season 😉

  10. KOLASINA(C)
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    What would you change in this attack in next couple of gameweek? 5.4 itb

    Mahrez Cabaye Payet KDB Sanchez
    Vardy Ighalo Pelle

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Nothing

      1. Reedy
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        This

    2. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I'm guessing you're benching Ighalo this week?

    3. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Ighalo to Lukaku gw 11

  11. sagheerpak
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    West Ham vs Chelsea result....?

  12. Lord of Ings
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Team:-
    Cathcart azpi Dawson
    Mahrez haz Payet Sanchez KDB
    Vardy betahino
    Subs:-Mignolet,Ighalo,Darmian,Reid.
    G2g?

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Not without a keeper you're not

      1. Lord of Ings
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        *Butland haha 😛
        Good to go?

        1. Pochecinno
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah, I'd say so. Even if Hazard doesnt play you'll have Ighalo coming on

          1. Lord of Ings
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            Hazard is gonna start tomorrow and have a feeling he"'ll prove his point and start vs West ham.Pedro is awful

  13. anish10
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    What to do with this lot?

    1FT 5.3ITB

    Begovic
    Evans Dawson Bellerin
    Payet Mahrez Sanchez KDB
    Martial Pelle Igahlo

    Hennesey/Hoolhan/Kolarov/Nyom

    Igalho > ?
    Kolarov > ?

  14. flippetyflop
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    For those of us doing a gw 11 wildcard, what and who do you consider essential for it?

    I'm thinking of going with 2 saints, 2 everton, 2 city, 2 united and 2 arsenal......not wide enough coverage?

    1. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Triple ManU and ManC and maybe Saints

  15. Jazz!
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Will want to have atleast a double City attack for Norwich (H). I already have Silva, so who else would you have (excluding KDB)?

    A) Bony
    B) Sterling
    C) Yaya

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      A

    2. Trae44
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I'll be getting in Sterling aswell as having KDB

  16. shirtless
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Just checked into Doosra's Wingback Wonders table to compare Moreno to Bellerin...

    Crosses ; Moreno 36 Bellerin 17

    Chances Created ; Moreno 16 Bellerin 9

    Startling!

    1. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Members... Stats...

    2. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Bellerin has far superior CS potential

      1. Granville
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Well Arsenal have 5 and Liverpool have 4. So it's marginal.

        1. Boris Bodega
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Liverpool should only have 2 though, spoken by a truly disgruntled Arsenal fan

        2. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Next 5 fixtures ?

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Gah! I've done it again!!! 🙁

        2. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Ur ticker says so....Arsenal followed by Citeh for CS potential

    3. KingNidge
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      good stuff cheers

    4. Acquafresca
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Members only mate. Don't share that on here.

      1. shirtless
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Sorry! I'll keep schtum next time.

    5. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Moreno was playing as an actual wing back for most of those games unlike Bellerin who is an attacking full back

  17. RustyBz
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Who to bench? (GW10)

    A) Mané
    B) Pellé
    C) Ighalo

    1. sagheerpak
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Pelle....

    2. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      C or A. Toss a coin

    3. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      C

    4. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      C

    5. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      C

  18. Hakuna Juan Mata
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Will Ayew play today?

    1. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Yes

    2. Jazz!
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah why not

    3. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Why shouldnt he? Their best player this season

    4. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      absolutly

  19. Dynamic Duos
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Are Cedric's minutes being reviewed? I've already expected the 1 but 6 would be lovely.

    1. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      No

      1. Dynamic Duos
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        OK not a problem.

      2. Heels_Over_Head
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        And I don't like it and I don't own him, but FPL doesn't change scores more than 24 hours after the fact

    2. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Of course not.

      1. Dynamic Duos
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        O I just seen something on here about it. Not that bothered really, as I say I expected the 1

        1. Dynamic Duos
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Sorry Excepted*

          1. Pochecinno
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            You were right the first time

    3. Granville
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Why would they? he didn't complete 60 minutes.

      1. Dynamic Duos
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        No I just seen something on here, didn't even think about it myself, I took 1

  20. RustyBz
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Hoping for 5+ points from Ayew tonight to crack the 70 point barrier for the GW 🙂

  21. Acquafresca
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Anyone taking the Wijnaldum plunge?

    Good fixtures in his next 5.

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      NEW: sun -51 STO -81 bou -183 LEI -9 cpl -227

      1. Acquafresca
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Is that good? The man is in form!

      2. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Those numbers will change a bit after tonight. 😉

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Marginally....

        2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Not a lot ...

      3. Pochecinno
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Thats overall though isnt it Doos? Theres quite a few porous defences their

        1. Pochecinno
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          there

        2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          I have found that this rough guide is more reliable.

      4. 1966 was a great year for E…
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Are your numbers weighted for the difficulty of the fixtures already played? As in do Newcastle get credit for having had a very difficult start to the season, fixtures-wise?

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Constantly. For instance, the ratings for last week were from 8 matchest this Season, roughly 30 from last Season.

          Credit, no. But the results are factored in. Credit involves opinion, which I have tried to exclude ...

          1. GreenWindmill
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            I'd have thought there's a way to feed in the ratings of the fixtures in which results were achieved when calculating the new ratings. I.e. getting thumped 6-1 when the fixture rating was -472 has less of a negative impact than losing 1-0 when the fixture rating was 398 (if you get my meaning).

            Might be tricky to achieve and would add a whole new layer of complexity but it would address 1966's point without introducing an extra element of human intervention.

            1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              Believe me, the maths is horrendous - and that's before you get to tinkering with LOOKUP formulae ...

              1. GreenWindmill
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                10 years, 1 month ago

                Oh I know, I was doing the simple job of describing the possibility - the practicalities would be foul 🙂

    2. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Who other Aguero and Suarez has had more than one hattrick (or more) performance in a season in the last 5 years?

      1. Acquafresca
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Alexis? (maybe)

    3. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I don't know. Original plan was Alli -> Cabaye, and I'd need Aguero to drop a bit further to afford him back if I go for Wij instead.

      But he has the fixtures and apparently a good goalscoring record. Seems to be adjusting to the prem well so signs are good...and Cabaye's pens may dry up.

    4. Dr Dream
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Probably....Already did in UFPL.

      1. Debauchy
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Whats your rank now Wakey , big move up I guess

        1. Dr Dream
          • 13 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          83 with four playing tonight.

          1. Debauchy
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            3 tonight 35 , lets do this

    5. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Im very seriously thinking of him and Mahrez as 4th and 5th mids on gw 11 wc.

      When Kun back , one of them to a 4.3 mid . Gives you a little time to decide

  22. Jafooli
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Swansea 7 - 7 Stoke

    (Williams x 7, Butland x 7)

    Too much to ask?

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Well, they will be bloody tired ... 😉

      1. Jafooli
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        About time they did a bit of work....

    2. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      A little bit

      1. Jafooli
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        6-6 same goal scorers?

        1. RustyBz
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          50/50 chance

          1. Jafooli
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 1 month ago

            I'll take it...

      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I remember when people would settle for hatties

      1. Jafooli
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Inflation....

  23. Trae44
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Taylor from Swans will be starting yeah?

    1. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      You'll find out soon enough!

  24. Jazz!
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Any Butland + Myhill owners around? Just wondering who you'd be playing next week.

    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Another reason to like Giggsy and Gary Neville:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-34569111

    A lot of faceless developers would have the squatters out immediately.

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Neville at least.

      Giggs is still a scumbag - ask his brother

    2. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I heard that one of the squatters was Nicky Butt

  25. IndyStarJack
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Players with the most influence in their team's goals following the weekend fixtures -
    (being involved means scoring or assisting a team goal)
    (% of goals involved in)

    Ighalo - 83%
    Pelle - 59%
    Lukaku - 58%
    Wijnaldum - 58%
    Morrison - 57%
    Vardy - 53%
    Arnautovic - 50% (plus anything tonight)
    Ayew - 50% (plus anything tonight)
    Deeney - 50%
    Mahrez - 47%
    Eriksen - 45%
    C. Wilson - 45%
    Sanchez - 44%
    Ozil - 44%
    Berahino - 43%
    Hoolahan - 43%
    Cabaye - 42%
    Mane - 41%
    Mata - 40%
    Gomis - 40% (plus anything tonight)
    Payet - 40%
    Gestede - 38%
    Coutinho - 38%
    Milner - 38%
    Mame Diouf - 38% (plus anything tonight)
    M'vila - 38%

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Nice

    2. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Ighalo wow.

      1. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Watford going daaaaan

      2. Heels_Over_Head
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah

        You kind of need the number of goals each team scored thus season next to that data

        1. RustyBz
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          If he can keep up 83% of their total goals I don't care if they go down or not, plenty of points 😀

    3. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Payet is 44.4% ... 😕

      1. IndyStarJack
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        have i missed of a goal or assist? i have 5 and 3

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Looks right to me after checking.

              • 12 Years
              10 years, 1 month ago

              over the last 4 fixtures....

      2. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        5g/3a out of 20?

    4. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Fantastic post.

    5. Raddy
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Hidden somewhat in the list is Eriksen. Due to injury he has only actually played 452 mins this season yet been involved in near half of Spurs goals. Spurs can also on their day, be very freely scoring.

  26. Ten Season Wonder
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Remember when everyone used to have Lampard, Ronaldo & Gerrard

    1. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      And Fabregas

      Those were the days

      1. Acquafresca
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        Ha! Beat me to it 😆

        1. Ten Season Wonder
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah, and Cesc.

          All you'd need to put with them is £4m bench fodder and you'd be set for the season.

    2. Acquafresca
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      and Fabregas.

  27. Boris Bodega
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    "The mutual dislike is genuine and was illustrated perfectly when Wenger and Mourinho were due to sit next to each other at an elite coaching seminar in Nyon last year only for one of them to switch the table settings.

    ‘Whenever Wenger spoke, Mourinho just stared out of the window,’ said a source."

    I wonder which one did it....

    1. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Either way, Mourinho is classless and Wenger exudes it. It's no surprise they act like chalk and cheese

    2. Heels_Over_Head
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Probably Mourinho

      Wenger is more of a gentleman whereas Mourinho has some Suarez street punk in him

      1. Pochecinno
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 1 month ago

        To be fair, Suarez seems like a much nicer human being than Mourinho

    3. Debauchy
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      Dont get why Mourinho is so threatened by a "specialist in failure", Do actually , Wenger is an intelligent adult ,Mourinho a narcissistic child

  28. CableEnable
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    I'm amazed how many of my ML rivals have done all 3 of their chips & not waited for dbl gwks....fools

  29. Jazz!
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 1 month ago

    Best Saints Defensive Asset?

    1. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I think a good case can be made for any of the back four.

    2. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      VVD

    3. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 1 month ago

      I went Berty, but it looks like VvD likes to notch.