Opinion
6 November 2017 2106 comments
MyPrettyPony MyPrettyPony
Share:

Manchester City players line up to kill off their rivals, but picking the prime suspect is still proving problematic for Fantasy managers. Midfield marauders stake their captaincy claims, but the most popular asset in the game is shedding owners at pace. Here is my latest attempt to sort the red herrings from the red devils.

It’s murder on the Etihad express

Not content with potentially having the Premier League wrapped up before we unwrap Christmas, Pep Guardiola now wants to see the upper echelons of the FPL standings all decked in sky blue. And we do mean all.

The Citizens have yet to be repelled, scoring more than one goal in every Premier League match except the Everton encounter (which featured Kyle Walker’s early bath) and the recent controlled dismissal of Chelsea.

What is more astounding, though, is the range of players who continue to contribute (despite the well-publicised rotation) to the slaying of their opponents, with at least five attacking returns so far from seven different players, all the way down to £5.2 million Fernandinho’s two goals and three assists.

Ironically, while six City players got in on the act against Arsenal, it was the much-vaunted Leroy Sane who took a back seat this week, although notably he did start his tenth match of City’s last 11 in all competitions and seems as bulletproof as any of Pep’s attackers ever can be.

Once more, owners of Sergio Aguero or Gabriel Jesus were left conflicted about whether to celebrate another goal apiece or lament the strikers’ ongoing job share, while the 100,000+ managers who had drafted in Nicolas Otamendi were rewarded with just one point and an enforced “rotation” away to Leicester City following his fifth booking of the season.

Mahrez is partying like its 2015

Speaking of the Foxes, it was a fourth consecutive attacking return for Riyad Mahrez as both Leicester and the Algerian personally maintained their recent good form.

It’s fair to say that he’s still some way off hitting the heights of his breakout and title-winning season, but let’s not forget that Leicester’s first six matches this season featured four of the last season’s top five sides.

Since then, only Harry Kane, Mohamed Salah and the City duo of Sane and Kevin De Bruyne can better Mahrez’s four attacking returns.

Whether he can continue that streak against three of the league’s tightest defences (City, Spurs and Burnley) in the next four weeks remains to be seen, although his owners will surely be tempted to retain his services through to the trip to the London Stadium in Gameweek 13.

We’re loving Dyche’s dependable defence

Which brings us to the Clarets, tucked in seventh place, level with Arsenal and Liverpool on points, and with five clean sheets in 11 matches.

Burnley’s defensive assets, while lacking in attacking flair thus far (aside from Stephen Ward’s goal and assist earlier in the season), are at least the model of reliability when it comes to their primary duties.

Ward, Matt Lowton and Ben Mee all find themselves in the top four for points per million. Furthermore, with so much frustration at defensive rest and rotation among the “bigger sides”, that trio – plus James Tarkowski – have completed all but ten minutes of Premier League action, providing an unrivalled level of consistency and comfort.

One enforced change was, of course, Nick Pope replacing the unfortunate Tom Heaton in Gameweek 4. However, it has proved very much like for like, with Pope actually recording saves and bonus points more regularly (every 18 minutes and every 98 minutes respectively) than the man he replaced (22 minutes and 150 minutes).

Let’s hope that Dyche doesn’t have his head turned by paper talk and depart Turf Moor. Stability all round is what’s required in the Clarets camp.

Somehow, somewhere, it’s all gone Rom

When it comes to defensive mindsets, Dyche seems more like Kevin Keegan when compared to the bus parker supreme, Jose Mourinho.

We all predicted that there would be very little to write home about as Manchester United entered a run of fixtures featuring three of their title rivals and an aggregate of two goals scored or conceded over those three matches proved the point.

The player who suffered most from this decidedly anti devil may care attitude was Romelu Lukaku, whose two assists in the last four matches is failing to stem the tide of heavy sales.

Whether it’s the Mourinho effect or the absence of Paul Pogba, a comparison of Lukaku’s first four matches to his last four is frightening, with most of the key statistics down by two thirds during that recent lull.

Owners who have gritted their teeth in anticipation of enjoying Lukaku’s emergence into the light at the end of this tunnel will be expecting significant returns against Newcastle and Brighton; sides that, lest we forget, both rank in the top six for restricting their hosts’ shots in the box.

Itchy fingers will be poised to jettison the Belgian should his dry run continue and with form, fixtures and finances turning in Alvaro Morata’s favour, Lukaku may not cross the Watford gap for many managers in Gameweek 14.

We should embrace a front and centre Salah

As one in red flounders, so another prospers.

Liverpool’s Salah helped himself to a pair of goals and a season-high haul against an obliging West Ham from a new central role. He now sits second to only Kane and Aguero in the Golden Boot race and has well and truly spanked the sellers who gained any satisfaction from his blank against Manchester United.

Whether or not he retains a striker’s role, or whether the Anfield penalty wheel of fortune comes around to him again, the Egyptian’s goal threat remains almost unrivalled. Only Kane (39) has unleashed more attempts in the box than Salah (32), while he is (perhaps surprisingly) unmatched when it comes to shots on target (24).

As with City, we can expect Liverpool’s goals to be shared, but Salah appears less vulnerable to rotation and benefitted from Sadio Mane’s return to the tune of two assists.

Those of us who captained Kane cast covetous glances in the direction of Salah’s 15 points this weekend. The dilemma now is not whether we should include him in our squads, but whether he should be trusted with the armband anon.

It’s advantage Murray

Last week, I examined the merits of a handful of budget “enablers” in the form of Glenn Murray, Mame Biram Diouf and Tammy Abraham.

Gameweek 11 proved a mixed bag for the trio, with Swansea City struggling to create chances for Chelsea’s on-loan Under 21 England man and Diouf shuffled back out wide for Stoke City.

Murray, though, continued to justify Chris Hughton’s faith by notching the winner against the toothless Swans, his fourth goal in three games.

With Pascal Gross and an increasingly confident Anthony Knockeart pulling the strings, Murray’s ageing legs aren’t proving a problem, while his finely-tuned goal scoring instincts are bearing fruit.

With a “derby” clash with former club Crystal Palace looming in Gameweek 13, the script is written for Murray to maintain his scoring streak and emerge as the optimum solution for those ploughing funds into midfield.

  1. F4L
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    TM price changes post in 3...2....1...

    1. RESULT
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      He's gone to sleep for once

      1. RESULT
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Zzzzzzzz

    2. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Bit premature there....

    3. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      5min...4min...

  2. ★Kuntheman★
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Lads, I have a question that I may be overthinking, but would love to hear your thoughts.

    Let's say someone takes a shot, the goalkeeper saves it, and it hits the post. The rebound falls to a player who has been standing in an offside position when the kick was taken. He puts it into the back of the empty net.

    Is the goal allowed or disallowed?

    1. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      He's offside, disallowed. Once its not David Silva 😉

      1. Captain Blanks
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        This

    2. RESULT
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      He was standing in an offside position when the kick was taken...disallowed?

    3. Paul
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Allowed imo

      1. Postman Ty
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        lol it's not an opinion question.

    4. F4L
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      surely disallowed? I'm a bit fuzzy on the intricacies of the offside rule though

    5. Deano
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Disallowed.

    6. Garlana
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Disall

      1. Garlana
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        -Owed...

    7. ★Kuntheman★
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      So I will say that the decision in this match ended up being that the goal was disallowed, and while it was the team I was rooting for, my first instinct was that it was offside, as in my eyes the play does not reset after the ball hits the post...but others thought that the ball hitting the post began a different play in which the player is now considered onside (do you guys understand what I'm trying to say?). With this in mind, what do you guys think? I'm still leaning to disallowed myself with my view on the ball hitting the post.

        1. ★Kuntheman★
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          "Gaining an advantage If the ball is played into the penalty area and he plays the ball that rebounds to him off a post, crossbar or an opposing defender, then the attacker is offside as they have gained an advantage by being in that position."

          Boom. There it is. Cheers TM!

    8. Brap.
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Disallowed

      Happens all the time

  3. Paul
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Hi DZ 😀

    anybody got any link to check the squad for International friendlies/qualifiers???

    heard Kane and Harry Winks have taken themselves off the squad

  4. Rainer
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Phil Jones rose

    1. Paul
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      he already did?

      1. Rainer
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        He did.

  5. Captain Blanks
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Anyone think Gundogan coming back threatens the minutes of Silva and KDB? There's been talk of how they don't get rested/rotated, but City have huge fixture congestion from now to the end of the year (2 games/week all the way) and Gundogan started in place of Silva away vs Napoli last week

    1. F4L
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      maybe. But one thing is for sure in my mind, that Sane/Sterling will be rotated a lot more than Silva and KDB

    2. RESULT
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Gonna happen

  6. @chapellefpl OR 577TH
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    The last two hot topics 'lukaku may struggle' and 'perma-captain aguero' are absolutely farcical. Wow talk about misinformation!

    1. F4L
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      everyone is allowed their opinion

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      They're just opinions man.

    3. Jairzinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Agree. It’s fake news. I’m captaining Lukaku, going without Agüero next week I think.

  7. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Price Changes - 7th November 2017

    🔺  Murray (5.8), Stones (5.7), Sané (8.9), Jones (5.5)

    🔻  Lukaku (11.5), Adam (4.7), Jacob.Murphy (5.0)

    1. rainy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Lukaku!

    2. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Lukakuuuuu 🙂

    3. Captain Blanks
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      L U K A K U F A L L S

    4. F4L
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Sane 🙁

    5. Mini Mane Mo
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Cheers TM!

    6. Paul
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Stones 😮

      wohooooo

    7. fedolefan
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      LUKA!!!!

    8. acidicleo
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      2-0

    9. GuyIncognito
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Nice, should be up to 103 TV soon.

    10. ★Kuntheman★
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      St(ones) and J(ones) 🙂

    11. jia you
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      2 up, 1 down, cheers TM.

    12. lamagica
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Thanks TM...
      Such a weird moment for lukaku to drop, united's fixtures are clearing up..

    13. Slow regard for silent thin…
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Buying Sane at 8.3 was a damn fine piece of business

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        It sure was buddy, I just bought him 20mins ago!

      2. Carlton_Goal
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Same thing here, got him when everyone else was getting sterling. Now I have both haha

    14. seewhyaxe
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      finally kaku drops!

    15. 5os
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Selling Jones on my GW8 WC to double up on the Southampton defense for their "great fixtures" was one of the biggest mistakes this season.

    16. The Overthinker
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      4 up

    17. QPRUTD
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      4 up
      on WC ofcourse 😉

    18. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      cheers TM

    19. Essrick
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Cue Lukaku goal

      Loads of times this season a player has dropped in price and got returns that GW.

      Mee, Hart, Daniels, Silva etc

    20. Forza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Selling Lukaku for a profit and watching him blank his way back to 11.5 was fun.

  8. melvinmbabazi
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Thoughts on what to do this week? 2FT 1.1 ITB
    Considering Bringing in Jones for Otamendi and De Gea for Foster and doubling up on United Defence.

    Foster, Elliot
    Otamendi, Lascelles, Mee , Naughton, Simpson
    Salah, Sterling, Groß, RLC, TC
    Kane, Lukaku, Jesus

    Any Other Suggestions?
    Cheers

  9. Wardinator
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Ok think I’ve cracked it. PRMWCT

    De Gea
    Alonso. Jones. Daniels. Dann. Mee
    Alli. Mane. Salah
    Kane. Morata

    (Speroni. Niasse. Surman. RLC

    Solid bench, 8 premium players (2 Man U, 2 Chelsea, 2 spurs, 2 Liv) plus Dann, Daniels & Mee (fixtures & value)

    Big thing is no city, but honestly I think that’s a viable tactic given heavy rotation inevitable over next 2 months

    Thoughts?

    1. Paul
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      do like ot

    2. seewhyaxe
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      How long would Alli be out for?

      1. Wardinator
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Only the break I think

  10. nick_pkt_12
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Who would you rather bring in.

    A. Pope
    B. Begovic

    1. Paul
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      A

    2. Mo Mané No Problems
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      A all day

  11. Rainer
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Lukaku dropping adds an extra 0.1m to make Ake an option.

    Ake - a CS will mean he gets BAPS
    vs
    Daniels - Goal & assist threat

    1. fedolefan
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Luka will add another 0.1 when he double rises before Brighton.

    2. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Francis got the same baps including a yc.

      1. Rainer
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        GW7 vs Leicester.

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          That's like saying Ward gets more BPS than Mee.

          1. GuyIncognito
            • 16 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            From an IRL perspective, I thought Francis wasn't good against Newcastle, gave the ball away several times leading to opportunities for Newcastle. Aké, on the other hand, was a boss. So Francis may be threatened by Adam Smith.

  12. rainy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    New players added 5th November:

    Mathieu Debuchy - Arsenal, Defender, £4.5
    Paulo Gazzaniga - Tottenham, Goalkeeper, £4.5
    Alfie Whiteman - Tottenham, Goalkeeper, £4.0

    1. rainy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      (neglected to post these the day they were added)

    2. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Cheers 🙂

    3. Kloppen Schloppen
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Gazzaniga for the win! Played a blinder against Palace.

    4. Jairzinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Debuchy.... had completely forgotten about him.

      1. Jairzinho
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Just checked. Really surprised that he only made 13 appearances for Arsenal. I’d have put him on a lot more than that. Like more than 50 if I was to guess.

        1. GuyIncognito
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          The new Winston Bogarde, the man who had 9 appearances for Chelsea over the course of 4 years.

    5. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      thanks

  13. jia you
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    My PP on Lukaku is 11.7. So if he rises again from 11.5 to 11.7, will I be able to sell him at 11.7?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      yes

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        thanks, presumed so but just checking.

    2. fedolefan
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        cheers

    3. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      That's a good bit of business 😛

      1. Pierce34
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        (I'm teasing of course, this coming from a man who bought Benteke at the beginning of the season and sold him 5 weeks later for 0.3 less!)

      2. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Haha, I just wasnt 100% sure what way it worked as I'm sure Kaku might rise in price back to 11.7 in a few gameweeks. Kind of screwed up my wildcard back at the time, losing value and buying back a cpl of players at higher prices!

        1. Speédy
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Very frustrating that. I have a similar situation now having to get Kane at 12.8 on WC.

  14. Live Lad
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Decided against moving early on Jones. His injury would be a disaster for my defense already with Ota, Davies, Mbemba, Morgan, Kola

    Lukaku's drop is welcoming. What about the following moves?
    Davies+ Morgan + Jesus to Jones + Daniels + Lukaku (-4)?

    Good moves? Daniels or Mee? Will get both eventually.

    1. fedolefan
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      I wouldn't do the Daniels move for a hit.

      1. Live Lad
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks! Morgan is facing Man City. But yes, not worth a hot I guess.

        1. fedolefan
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah, I thought about that. I own Daniels myself but don't trust the Bournemouth defense too much. Huddersfield don't score a lot though. Do you have any moves planned for next week? If you do, then maybe the hit is worth it for you'll never find a free transfer.

          1. Live Lad
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            Thanks mate! Yes, there seem to be transfers to do every week 🙂 Have Ritchie and no City attacker if Jesus has to go. Ritchie to GroB and Eriksen to Sane/ Sterling/ Silva in mind.

            1. fedolefan
              • 11 Years
              8 years, 1 month ago

              Take the hit then and your moves look good.

              1. Live Lad
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 1 month ago

                Thanks! Ritchie to GroB first maybe. Daniels later. Still have time to decide.

    2. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Nice moves, I'd get Daniels in first.

      1. Live Lad
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks! You think Kaku will come good? All my rivals have him (my advantage so far) but if he goes big I'll be in trouble.

        1. Rainer
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          He wont get two better fixtures to start scoring again. More than likely my captain in both.

          1. Live Lad
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            Thanks for that!

  15. jia you
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Hmmm 20 transfers made is quite a lot but I've had more than my fair share of injuries tbf!
    Can anybody beat 20 transfers + wc?

    1. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      16 transfers here (-28 points in hits overall).

      My major failing this season (apart from being really unlucky with 50/50 calls, which can't be legislated for) was overreacting every time something unexpected happened, instead of going for the obvious move.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Wow, that's a lot too mate. I'd be 18 but I've made two already to catch the Sane rise today (really wanted him!). Hits really worked out for me last season finishing top 5k but this years it's been a bit of a shocker!

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Same, even hits that have ostensibly 'worked' (Sanchez to Sterling and Lukaku to Kane last week) ended up costing me points. That particular hit on its own was actually a net +- of 0 and I'm happier with my team now, but if I hadn't done it I'd have captained Salah instead of Kane and have been 13 points better off. Plus I'd have made the same moves this week for free, so another 4 points!

          1. jia you
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            This week would have been fine apart from not owning Salah! Happy enough with my team and have Kane + Alli in now for Spurs nice run of hoping that pays off!. Vardy is my only real issue at the minute but might persist with him for another couple of weeks.

    2. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      18 transfers,and WC active now

    3. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Goodness. 12 transfer + WC

      What's your OR?

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Poor, 1.4m ish. Players I've brought in have got injured almost staight away! Alli this week, Coutinho the week before, Mendy, Walker(red card), Pogba and more but can't think off the top of my head!

    4. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Wow. I'm only 8 + WC.

    5. SuperMane Returns
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      21 transfers and WC used ... 102.2 SV - 1.6m OR

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        and we have a winner hehe, thanks for making me feel slightly better 😉

    6. OPTA FPL
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      12

    7. swish41
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      17 + wc. I've had mendy, aguero, coutinho, zaha, pogba injuries + a.carroll, mane, arnautovic red cards. Planning to save this upcoming gameweek though.

    8. BananaNose Maldonado
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      I'm seeing pattern here between the number of transfers/hits and people's OR, but I can't quite put my finger on it 🙂

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Hehe, the complete opposite of last season where many conservative players were being left behind at this stage.

      2. Pierce34
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Haha, true. Though I was similarly aggressive with hits last year and finished at around 2k. Luck of the draw I guess.

        1. BananaNose Maldonado
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah, certainly. There are plenty of ways to succeed at this game. But I think, in the long run, season over season, it's just good not to start the week in a hole. But things still could shift this season in favor of the hits takers.

      3. Jayv807
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        I took -196pts in hits last year and finished 16.6k which is a pretty decent rank I think. I have slowed the hits so far this year but pretty much almost all of my hits this year have backfired. Problem is being patient is backfiring for me too !!! Haha just a rough year so far.

  16. SuperMane Returns
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Just did Bavies/Silva to Jones/Sane (-4) to catch the 0.2 rise, now leaves me a City triple up of Sane/Sterling/Kun - very excited about this!

    1. Speédy
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Jones can get injured any moment,any day of his life. Not worth the risk going so early on players like him. Hope it pays off for you

    2. Big_Andy_GAWA
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Best 3, IMO.

  17. fedolefan
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Any thoughts on the Newcastle defense? Own Lascelles and think I should move on. They keep things very quiet but have that annoying habit of conceding a goal.

    1. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Yep, they're a good, organised defensive side who don't allow many shots. Unfortunately the few they do allow end up going in in annoying 1-0 defeats 😆

      Lascelles owner here too, have been doubling up with Elliot these past 3 GWs out of necessity more than anything else.

      1. Pierce34
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        At least I'm happy for the money gained on Lascelles since I bought him at 4.5, can now move him on to Mee.

      2. fedolefan
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        I don't play Elliot at all though, well not since GW5 anyway. Lascelles was brought in for his goal threat and those decent fixtures against sides that can't score too much but these last two losses against Burnley and Bournemouth have annoyed me. He's 4.7m too.

    2. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Rafa will result in plenty of clean sheets but don't fancy doubling with Elliot. Better defenders at 4.4-4.9m as well. No rush in selling him but I'd prefer Bur/Bha/Bou/Moreno over one of their defenders.

      1. fedolefan
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah, as I replied above, I just don't play Elliot. Lascelles is there for his goal threat and baps in the chance they concede. Already own defenders/keepers from Bur/Bha/Bou but Moreno, Pieters or a Burnley double-up I've been looking at.

        1. Rainer
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah plenty of options and Lascelles is a good one too.

          If he's your main worry then you're not doing to badly 🙂

          1. fedolefan
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            He's not a worry but a frustration. Him and Dann (don't ask) are in for the odd rotation and benching based on form. They have goal threat, and have no rotation threat around Xmas. Don't lose out too much if they concede since most end up playing Elliot anyway.

  18. Legomane
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Evening DZ - thoughts appreciated...

    Pope
    Jones Stones Davies Ward
    Hazard Eriksen Salah
    Kane Jesus DCL
    (Elliot RLC Wimmer Carroll)

    1FT 0.2ITB

    Davies Jesus >
    A. Duffy Aguero(c)
    B. Daniels Lukaku(c) - but no attacking City cover...
    C. Something else?

  19. Live Lad
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    No chance of Kaku falling again before the deadline right? With the fixtures and the fact that he is now at his original price.

    I guess he had to make way for Kane before last deadline resulting in sales of such amount.

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Back to original price so nearly 300K sales needed.

  20. Carlton_Goal
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Am I right to want to play 5 at the back this week? All home games, I have;
    Jones & Bailly (New)
    Moreno (Sou)
    Ward (Swa)
    Daniels (Hud)

    It also means benching Richarlison (he has a home game anyway) and 1 of Jesus, Murray, Sterling, Sane, Salah or Kane. Or should I just bench 1 of Moreno and Daniels?

    1. Rainer
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      You're going to have a similar benching headache every other week, good luck!

      Don't bench Richarlison.

      1. Kiwivillan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Rubbish home stats

        1. Rainer
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Nothing on his away stats but I still wouldn't bench him. On the verge of a big haul, could come at any time.

      2. Carlton_Goal
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Yes is a real benching headache at the moment. Richarlisons home form has hardly compared to his away form, I was just thinking that he has the lowest potential points returns out of my mids and attackers. Maybe I should just pt Murray 1st sub even after just getting him in?

        1. shortymak
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Bench boost?

          1. Carlton_Goal
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            Unfotunately already used it, and it was a catastrophe as I only had 12/15 play in the end

        2. Rainer
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yeah I'd probably bench Daniels & Murray but wouldn't be comfortable with it at all.

          1. Carlton_Goal
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            Murray 1st sub?

            1. Rainer
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 1 month ago

              Toss up.

              1. Carlton_Goal
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 1 month ago

                This is honestly the worse benching headache I've had in fantasy football

    2. RIDZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      bench Daniels I'd say

    3. shortymak
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Keeper??

      1. Carlton_Goal
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Lossl, Hart on bench

    4. jia you
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      See below, my first two subs are defenders who have nice home fixtures but can't fit them in! Wouldnt bench Richarlison mate!!

    5. fedolefan
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Could bench boost? There's hardly anyone benchable there. Could easily come out with 20 odd points depending on your keeper. You ain't making too much more than that in a DGW anyway regardless of what you believe to be the ceiling.

      1. fedolefan
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Sorry, just seen the BB reply.

        1. Carlton_Goal
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yes unfortunately its already gone. Wish I had saved it for now, even with Atsu as 3rd sub

  21. jia you
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    An early look at my line up and have two good subs judging on fixtures, benching order correct?

    Fabianski
    Jones / Daniels / Ward
    Alli / Sane / Richarlison / Gross
    Kane / Lukaku / Vardy
    (Nor, Duffy, Dann, TC)
    0.7itb
    0FT

    1. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      No idea, that's going to be benching headache all the way to the end, but the plus side of course is you won't have to worry about the hectic upcoming schedule.

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah but I prefer a benching headache to having a crap bench! Got Duffy off my bench last week for example. What do you think of my current squad mate, having gotten rid of my expensive defenders (Alonso, Davies & Bellerin) over the past few weeks?

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          I like it better as I was never a fan of expensive defenders (Alonso last year was the exception). I prefer your Sane to my Sterling and your Gross to my Choupo-Moting.

          The only thing I would say is it lacks Salah 😉

          P.S. I'm still kicking myself for selling Ramsey. He was such a good pick on my wildcard ahead of his good run of form, if only I had kept the faith!

          1. jia you
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            I should have held Ramsey also but I'm not convinced he'll be the best pick long term with o many mids coming onto the radar, would prefer to have Zaha for exaple atm!
            You're right about Salah, I'm just hoping he calms down a bit for a couple of gameweeks til I decide what to do with Vardy!
            He was in my pre-season team 99% of the time as he was looking immense in pre-season, but went KDB last minute instead!

    2. Pjanić At The Disco
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Good to go

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers

    3. Carlton_Goal
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Maybe Duffy for Daniels? Just feel Brighton are slightly more solid defensively, definitely a hard one though. Good looking team that

      1. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks man but I want to play Daniels as HUD don't have much goal threat and I see BOU as an improving team going forward.

  22. RIDZ
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Could you please help me answer this:
    a) Richarlison or Zaha for now?
    b) Sterling+Sane or only one of them is enough?

    Currently on WC and planning to use 352 or 442 each week

    1. jia you
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Leave out Sterling and get the other 3?

      1. RIDZ
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        who are the other 3?

      2. jia you
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        a) get both
        b) just Sane

    2. Pjanić At The Disco
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      A) get both if you can
      B) Sane

  23. Fantasy Challenged
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    How many people playing Fifa 18?

    What do you think of it so far?

    I've just started my 3rd season with Wolves. Got them promoted to the Prem in the 1st season and had to avoid relegation last. Putting together a decent squad too.

    1. jia you
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      I'm still playing Football Manager 2008...can't get enough of that game!

      1. PaladinVargas
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Can't beat Championship Manager 01/02 either. Freeware now, and amazing to work with the youth knowing your knowledge of the future.

        1. jia you
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Yep, love it mate. Latest game, got WBA from the championship to the Champions league due to this in a few seasons! Have a young Cavani banging in goals, a young Lloris in goal, Bale LWB, David Luiz CB, Banega & Hamsik rocks in midfield and a young Luka Modric assisting 🙂

    2. christoff
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      I"m playing crypt of the necrodancer, bioshock infinite, alien: isolation, amnesia: dark descent, dark cells but no Fifa playing a sport as a game just feels too much of step back from real life :PP

      1. lugs
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        similar to me , i love football and gaming but i haven't played a Fifa game in years , games like Bloodborne ,Wolfenstein ,Dead Space ,Bioshock etc are more my cup of tea 🙂

        1. PaladinVargas
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Bloodborne is easily the best game of this generation. Still haven't played anything close to it and working my way through NG+5 right now.

      2. Fantasy Challenged
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Fair enough and I do switch it up too. Recently been playing Watchdogs, Prey, Infamous and will soon play the new Mass Effect.

        1. lugs
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          i played that new Mass Effect , it got a lot of hate but i liked it , it did take a while for me to get into it , but once i did i thought it was pretty good , its not as good as any of the original trilogy though

          1. Fantasy Challenged
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            Yeah. I'm trying to ignore the hate and form my own opinion. If it comes close to the original trilogy it'll at least be a good game.

  24. ★Kuntheman★
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Alright lads so here is a further technicality to the goal I mentioned a few posts up.

    So it turns out that when the shot was taken by who we shall call Player A, Player B was onside. The ball hits the keeper, hits the post, and falls to Player B in an offside position, who shoots, and scores.

    So here is where I am finding it a bit difficult to distinguish whether or not this goal should be allowed. The FIFA rule says (as per BBC): "However, a player does not necessarily have to touch the ball to influence play. They are still offside if, in the opinion of the referee, they are judged to be gaining an advantage If the ball is played into the penalty area and he plays the ball that rebounds to him off a post, crossbar or an opposing defender, then the attacker is offside as they have gained an advantage by being in that position."

    This I find confusing because it does not necessarily give any information as to the position of the attacker when the ball was kicked that ended up rebounding off the post to the attacker that is now indisputably in an offside position, but not necessarily at the initial kick.

    Furthermore, as per TM's link: https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_11_offside_en_47383.pdf
    Look at page 23 and page 24. The visual (pg 23) states that a player B who was offside when the initial kick was taken is considered offside when the ball deflects off the keeper and into his stride. The visual in pg 24 states that the player B who was onside when the initial kick was taken and then runs onto the ball from an onside position is considered onside. But it does not necessarily have a case for when the player B is onside when the initial kick is taken, but then receives the ball (and scores) in an offside position after two deflections of the ball.

    What do you guys think? Goal or no goal?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      How is Player B offside when you said he was onside?

      1. ★Kuntheman★
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Isn't that the question here? 😆

        The scenario is basically this. Player A shoots (at this time Player B is in an onside position). The ball is saved, hits off the post, and falls to Player B who is now in an offside position. Player B scores.

        Should the goal be allowed or disallowed?

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          He was onside! You said it yourself.

        2. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          Goal, you said he's onside.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01-uArNpdw
          The goal at the end is similar.

          1. ★Kuntheman★
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            That summed it up perfectly. So it turns out my team were at the hands of injustice 😆

            When I found out that he was onside when the ball was kicked, I thought it was a goal. But, "However, a player does not necessarily have to touch the ball to influence play. They are still offside if, in the opinion of the referee, they are judged to be gaining an advantage If the ball is played into the penalty area and he plays the ball that rebounds to him off a post, crossbar or an opposing defender, then the attacker is offside as they have gained an advantage by being in that position" confused me because it did not provide any information as to where the player was when the ball that rebounded was originally kicked, thus implying that being offside off the rebound at the end of the play was an advantage in itself. Do you get what I mean?

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 16 Years
              8 years, 1 month ago

              Was that a goal or offside in the video?

              1. ★Kuntheman★
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 1 month ago

                The guy doesn't do the best job of describing it because it seems he's contradicting his visual at first, but essentially Young would be called offside if he was offside when the ball left RVP(?)'s foot, but not at the moment of the deflection (I think the implication is that this is the case if he was onside initially, as he was in the video? I don't know mate, I might be overthinking these 😆 )

                1. ★Kuntheman★
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 1 month ago

                  Essentially I think it counted as a goal, or at least that's what the video says...maybe I'm just confusing myself but the narrator's description of "not at the moment of the deflection" doesn't suggest anything about where the player was prior to or after the deflection...which almost suggests a fresh play is occurring when the deflection takes place, and FIFA rules suggest this is not the case.

                  I need aspirin.

                2. TorresMagic™
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 16 Years
                  8 years, 1 month ago

                  The post isn't a player plus it's a backwards pass if it was. It's an old video but doubt anything has changed. Treat it like RVP passing to Young without the post.

                  1. ★Kuntheman★
                    • 10 Years
                    8 years, 1 month ago

                    And if you treat it as such, it is a goal. And therefore, my team were robbed. I am not going to think any further about this because my brain is slowly frying. 😆

                    Cheers though TM, it's been an interesting topic to look into.

                    1. ★Kuntheman★
                      • 10 Years
                      8 years, 1 month ago

                      Oh, and apparently the Young goal was given as offside 😆 not even going to bother confusing myself further on that one, let's just call that refereeing error based on our new definition. 🙂

    2. Carlton_Goal
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Still a goal, was onside when the ball was played.

      1. ★Kuntheman★
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        Which would make sense. But then, "They are still offside if, in the opinion of the referee, they are judged to be gaining an advantage If the ball is played into the penalty area and he plays the ball that rebounds to him off a post, crossbar or an opposing defender, then the attacker is offside as they have gained an advantage by being in that position."

        And like I said, this I find confusing because it does not necessarily give any information as to the position of the attacker when the ball was kicked that ended up rebounding off the post to the attacker that is now indisputably in an offside position, but not necessarily at the initial kick. Do you get what I mean?

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 1 month ago

          What you've quoted doesn't contradict the fact that the player was onside when the shot was taken, which is all that matters surely.

          1. ★Kuntheman★
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 1 month ago

            It doesn't contradict it but (at least from the way I'm reading it) it seems to imply that the attacker is at an advantage simply by receiving the rebound in an offside position, and therefore the attacker is offside.

            Poorly written if you ask me (I think the distinction of being onside when the ball was kicked and then offside when received should be described within the rule of rebounds), or maybe I'm just not interpreting it correctly.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 16 Years
              8 years, 1 month ago

              Team mates pass is the only thing that counts. If you are good enough to play for a rebound off opponent or post for your team mate then that's a bonus.

              1. ★Kuntheman★
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 1 month ago

                😆

            2. Pierce34
              • 10 Years
              8 years, 1 month ago

              I would think it means if he was offside to begin with (i.e. offside position but not interfering with play when the shot is taken - however, gaining an advantage later from the way the ball bounces to him).

              1. ★Kuntheman★
                • 10 Years
                8 years, 1 month ago

                I agree with you, though this isn't necessarily explicitly stated in the definition, and that's why I don't like the description of it...I feel that it leaves certain aspects of the play up to assumption, and a defined rule should not do that.

                Now granted, this rule is taken by BBC from the context of the FIFA rule book, so the context prior to this quote may have included the setting of the initial kick, but the quote in itself does not define this well enough, and that may be a fault of BBC rather than FIFA. Do you get what I mean?

                1. Pierce34
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 1 month ago

                  Yeah, I just think you're over-interpreting it probably. To my mind it's a clarification that you're still offside if you benefit from the rebound.

  25. Pjanić At The Disco
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Any immediate changes needed for this lot?

    Elliot | Krul
    Davies | Mee | Jones | Naughton | Rosenior
    Salah | Sane | Richarlison | Choupo | RLC
    Kane | Lukaku | Morata

    0.0m ITB

    Cheers!

    1. Srv210
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Defence ,get some nailed player instead of babies as Naughton & rosenoir are not to be trusted.
      Get pope in goal if you can

  26. Srv210
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Who to get
    A) mahrez or sterling
    B) Vertonghen or Daniels

    Mahrez is showing good form and I already own sane so doubling up on city is ok ??
    Spurs have good fixtures although Daniels has a attacking threat.
    Very confusing

  27. SpagBol
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Thoughts on this team?
    Should I save the transfer?

    GK: De Gea (Elliot)
    DEF: Azpilicueta / Jones / Daniels / Ward (Duffy)
    MID: Salah / Sane / Richarlison / GroB (Loftus-Cheek)
    FWD: Kane / Morata (Abraham)

    2M in the bank...

    Cheers 🙂

    1. shortymak
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Who the hell would u transfer great team

    2. christoff
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Feels like a brag to me 😛

      Although...i'd be tempted to play the M City roulette...rotating Aguero with MOrata..and I would also consider upgrading Ward to Kola / Valencia / Duffy.

      Doulbing up on Man U defence seems like good idea with 8 CS already

  28. Weeb Kakashi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Kane injured? Will he be back for the Arsenal game?

    1. Srv210
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      Think so, it maybe a minor injury to get him rest from IB

  29. Super Swans
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Elliot - Foster
    Jones - Stones - Daniels - Mee - mbemba
    Sane - Salah - Mane - Ramsey - TC
    Kane - Aguero - Diouf
    0 itb
    Thoughts guys?

    1. christoff
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      What formation are you playing?

      Looks like 442.

      Stones to Azpi seems obvious choice. Gotta get some of that Chelsea love...

  30. Pierce34
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 1 month ago

    Injuries permitting, is it safe to assume that Mourinho will return to a back 4 vs. Newcastle, with Smalling benched?

    1. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 1 month ago

      It seems that Smalling has been used for the top 6 type matches. So yes but I don't think we can say for sure

      1. Pierce34
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 1 month ago

        That's what I thought, cheers.