Community Submissions
6 March 2018 104 comments
Ragabolly Ragabolly
Share:

In this article, I will present some statistics that I managed to calculate using a software I am developing. The statistics are focusing on the current status of the Top 10,000 managers regarding Blank Gameweek 31.

The data includes intersections between how many free transfers (FT) the Top 10k managers have over the next two deadlines, the number of Gameweek 31 players they currently have and the percentage of managers who still have their Free Hit chip (FH) available.

After presenting the raw data, I will attempt to predict how Blank Gameweek 31 will look like for the Top 10k based on some reasonable assumptions. Note that the article focuses on the Top 10k as they are the best sample for active players. A good rule of thumb usually is that if you beat the top 10k average, you are in good shape and should expect a green arrow in most cases.

The Statistics

  • The average number of current Gameweek 31 players in top 10k teams is 5.7011. The full distribution can be seen in the picture.

  • The percentage of Ttop 10k teams with FH available is 60.45%.
  • The average number of FTs available to Top 10k teams before GW31 is 2.3627 since 36.27% of the managers currently have 2FTs.
  • Teams with no FH available have an average of 5.5575 Gameweek 31 players, while teams with FH have an average of 5.795 players.
  • Teams with no FH available have an average of 2.3075​ free transfers, while teams with FH have an average of 2.399 free transfers.

Free Hit-Less In Trouble

The initial look at the stats suggests that the four out of ten Top 10k managers who already used their FH seem to be in much more trouble not only because they can’t use FH in Gamweek 31 but also because they currently have a lower number of Gameweek 31 players. They also have less free transfers. This is surprisingly as this group should have been the ones looking to plan better for this blank fixture.

Careful planning for FH chip holders should prove rewarding.

Analysis

In an attempt to utilise this data in order to simulate the situation at Gameweek 31, I used a set of reasonable simplifying assumptions (that will be assessed next week) to figure out the average number of players and FH users in Gameweek 31 among this elite group of managers.

The assumptions are:

  • People who have no FH available will use all their FTs to get Gameweek 31 players. This leads to an estimated average number of players for them in Gameweek 31 of 7.865, with no hits.
  • People who have no FH available and who will have less than eight players after using all their FTs are likely to take a hit. This leads to an estimated average number of players for them in GW31 of 8.284, with -1.677 deducted points.
  • People with their FH available are 100%  likely to use this chip if they currently have less than four players, 50% if they currently have between four & seven players, and won’t use FH if they currently have more than seven players. This leads to an estimated total number of Gameweek 31 FHs of 2780 in the top 10k.
  • People who will save their FH will use all FTs to bring in Gameweek 31 players. This leads to an estimated average number of players for them in Gameweek 31 of 8.663, with no hits.
  • People who will save their FH and who will have less than eight players after using all their FTs are likely to take a hit. This leads to an estimated average number of players for them in Gameweek 31 of 8.915, with -1.008 deducted points.

The table below shows the summary of the simulation.

Therefore, the current status and the assumptions above predict that all in all, 27.8% of the Top 10k will use FH in GW31 to field 11 players, while the remaining 72.2% will be able to field an average of 8.57 players with average points deducted of -1.374 or 8.23 players with no hits.

So, the difference between a FH team and a non FH team is around just 2.5 players. Thinking of the possible Gameweek 31 players, we can’t even say that owning those 2.5 extra players will yield many points as most of them are average FPL players. If we generously say a Gameweek 31 player will average 3-4 points, then the advantage of using a FH is around 8-11 points.

Hence, I think now every manager could judge their situation accordingly. If you can field nine players with no hits, then you are already around/above the Top 10k average, which can only field around 8.23 players with no hits.

In that case, the average expected gain of using FH is minimal and is around 11 points max with a score that is below GW average by three too four points. If you need a number of hits to reach eight  to nine  players, add the needed deducted points to 11 points and that’s how much using FH may help, and then make your decision! Best of luck.

104 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Wow. This is excellent.

    Also good to see that I'm slightly ahead of others in the top 10K, with seven GWK 31 players and two frees to take that up to nine.

    Will give this a mention on tonight's Scoutcast. Fits in well with some research I've done on players that are worth taking a hit for that I'll also mention tonight.

    1. SW6
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I'm in the same position as you Jonty. Currently 7 GW31 players and two FTs to use before then. Was plannig on taking a hit GW31 but I may well now avoid.

      I have no WC or FH so each player i sell for a GW31 player means another transfer to bring them back in for their upcoming DGWs also. When that player is a premium e.g. Sterling/Mahrez and I'm buying Shaqiri or whoever it doesn't make sense to me. I think I should be content with 8 players and a small drop in rank in GW31.

    2. DJ1000
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I have 9 players in but one of them is Ibe. Likely to sub for Walcott this gw. May then take a hit for a goalie and striker in gw31 to get 11 players out. I am always of the opinion it is better to have 11 players, as I like to speculate that someone like Mounie, King, Stanislas etc can get a big haul in and be a differential. I remember bringing Ndoye in for Hull a couple of seasons back and getting a 10 pt haul. I always look to gain an advantage even if for a hit.

    3. clodhopper
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Planned too take free hit weeks ago so been picking premium players mahrez etc without stressing about blank got 75this week have a good team for next week which gives me differentials as others trying too get blank week dross in can choose great team for blank and may not even have too use wildcard as will have plenty playing double 34 I must admit I had too make a decision 3weeks ago but seem too be working out fingers xsed moving in the right direction I enjoy this part of the season with doubles and blanks using chips you can't really assays how well you have done over 1 week the changes effect how you play over a period of weeks will enjoy tinkering with fh team 31 makes game more fun

      1. Cork Eagle
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        I'm doing the same as you but with commas and full stops its fun

  2. Limbo
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great read. Thanks!

    Think I'm more confused about my approach than ever (7 players for GW31 as it stands)...

    1. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Means you are in great shape. If you have one to two free transfers left you are on course for matching the top 10K. If you have three then you will probably get more than them.

      1. Limbo
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah. Looks that way. I have 1 FT this week, which I'm saving.

    2. Limbo
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Also - who wrote this?

      1. QPRUTD
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Look beside the Article heading

        1. Limbo
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          Ah, on far right of article. (I'm on + 2000px res so the right hand side get's lost into periphery).

  3. Buck The Trent
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    great analysis, thanks !

  4. Do I Not Like Orange
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    I have no FH, 7 players (but one of them is Wilson) and will carry 2 FTs (currently ranked top 2k). If I had my time over I wouldn't have used the FH when I did, but not sure I want any more than 9 GW31 jobbers anyway.

  5. QPRUTD
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Nice Analysis. Well Done
    Playing FH in 31 seems less profitable day by day.
    Thanks for this 🙂

  6. tisza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    This is very interesting.
    Top 200.
    I've got 6 + Quaner. 3 FTs.
    Actually makes me pretty comfortable to actually avoid hits and maybe not even use all the FTs . If I can buy an extra week without WCing would be really useful.
    No intention (barring injury/suspension meltdown) to use FH in 31. Might lose net 4 or 5 pts on GW but would hope to gain more than that when I use it later.

    1. Limbo
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      This is it. IF you have 6-7 players + 2FT's you're already set and can concentrate the FH chip like this:

      https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2018/03/04/scout-notes-city-see-off-stubborn-chelsea/?hc_page=2#hc_comment_17761215

  7. The Rumour Mill
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Ruben Loftus Cheek still kicking around for many of the top 10k? He might be skewing the picture ever so slightly.

    1. Fitzy.
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Wish he was still kicking around, could do with an extra player!

      1. The Rumour Mill
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Me too!

    2. tisza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      about 6%.

      Also quite a few "popular" players which have to be considered as a half due to non-guaranteed starts - DCL, Niasse,Quaner, maybe Wilson

      Other key issue is how many top 10k sides won't have a keeper.
      Large % with DDG (particularly with Elliot on bench).
      Pickford highest owned starting keeper this GW @6.5%.
      Other keepers for GW31 seem to average around 3% ownership

      1. The Rumour Mill
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Cool, cheers.

        Yeah very true on the 4 you mention there. For my sake hoping Wilson can hold off defoe!

        There might be a rush for Butland for GW31 itself, thats where I'm looking anyway as in the same no playing keeper boat

  8. SW6
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Really good article that is certainly very helpful. Important to remember that the majority of players (especially given the teams that are playing GW31) will score 1 or 2 points. Getting the right players is more important than getting the right quantity of players.

    Huddersfield have kept 3 clean sheets in the last 22GWs, Bournemouth have only kept 5 all season, with just 1 in the last 16GWs.

    Getting the correct 3rd Liverpool player is a more important decision than the fillers from the poor teams that make up the numbers for GW31 in my opinion

    1. Varsenal
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I think you’ve hit it here. I have Karius & 2 FTs. Thinking about using them to get Klarius out and bring Mane or VVD in. This would only give me 6 gw31 players, but that could be enough.

    2. fusen
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      This I reckon is absolutely spot on.

      I've got a really annoying situation where my current plans will give me 10-11 starting players for GW31 but it is made up of 4 defenders and a goalkeeper once I made my transfers.

      I have absolutely no faith in getting a single cleansheet.

      The attacking players I already have that are playing are not in form.

      So I either use up my transfers to bring in different attacking players and end up with maybe 6-7 players or go with the current plan and have loads of 2 pointer players as no one gets a cleansheet.

      1. Trippier Hazard
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Agree - focus on populating midfield and attack players for best chances of returns of 2+ points - not too big a concern if you can't get enough defenders or GK, you'll only get a few points there. Not worth taking hits on transfers unless it's to stock up on Liverpool.

  9. Fitzy.
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great work mate, thanks for the effort you put into this!

  10. fusen
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Interesting, lots of assumptions but good to get a rough general idea of the sort of landscape going into the BGW

    I'm almost more interested in how accurate the assumptions turn out to be than the FPL site of things 😛

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Haha, thanks mate, I am excited to know too

  11. Varsenal
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Interesting article. I don’t agree with all of your assumptions (it’s difficult to say 100% if anyone is going to do a thing because people are unpredictable), but the data has to begin somewhere.

    I’m just inside top 10k, and have mostly ignored gw31 in my transfers, which has brought 4 green arrows in a row. I’m not convinced that even 7 players in gw31 is necessary, especially if you have to take hits before or/and after to get players out.

    I think it’d be interesting to see how many green arrows in gw31 are followed up by red arrows as managers try to adjust for dgws (excluding FH & wildcards).

    1. SW6
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I think it is a really intriguing situation. GW30 is also a very interesting as it is almost being forgotten as people plan for the BGW instead. Chelsea and Man City have excellent fixtures and are seeing no investment (if anything there assets are being sold).
      A lot of top 10k players may go into City's game with Stoke with a 1 or 0 City player. Possibly more ground could be made by owning 3 City players for that fixture and having less in the BGW than the alternative

    2. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I think they are pretty fair. He's pretty much got me nailed based on current GWK 31 players and transfers. Read me like a book! 🙂

    3. DJ1000
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I have Eriksen Mahrez Shaqiri Ibe and Salah in midfield. So have the best of both worlds. Just hauled 66 points and gone up by 2,000 to 8,000th. Have 9 gw31 players, but likely to get Walcott in for Ibe. May take a hit to have 11 gw31 players and get a differential like Mounie, King or Stanislas in. I always like to field 11 players. Sometimes apparent dross can surprise you.

      1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        this

  12. Ragabolly
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    The assumptions had to start somewhere indeed, it’s just to have an idea about how things are generally going. But I still think that most of the assumptions are in the right direction more or less.

  13. mookie
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great work Ragabolly, thanks for sharing!

  14. DMil
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Assume some of these teams may also include Kenny, DCL and RLC who, although having a game in 31, probably won't play.

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Yeah that’s why I think it’s really generous to say an average GW31 player will score 4 points, and even that doesn’t give much gain for FH.

  15. Moddle
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    If no Wildcard and available Free Hit:
    IMO the advantage of using Free Hit is that I can now buy DGW players only, sets me up great for the DGW without hits. The teams that will play in GW31 are not interesting me, except for Liverpool.

    My only GW31 players currently are 3 Liverpool players, but I even plan to sell one this week just to get one back on Free Hit. Will set me up nicely for the DGW with only Salah as a single GW player.

    The question for GW 31 is if you can punt on the right players and be lucky with some goals, but that you would never actually be interested in owning any other GWs. Who know's who I'll end up with but players like Stanislas, Wilson, Sig, Coleman etc could be great (or blank...)

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Yeah if you don’t have your WC, that’s fair enough

    2. SW6
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I don't think GW31 is worth the FH chip personally, you could use it to get 11 starters but you'll have a team of 8 average FPL players that will probably only just outscore those who don't eve have a fixture, and 3 Liverpool players. I really would consider saving it for a week when you can make a really strong team.

      1. alexmj
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        His gain is greater thought, as he'd be going in with 2 only, so his gain is 9 players at an average of 3-4 points would be a good return for a free hit of 27-36.

  16. Infamy, Infamy
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    This type of article is FFS at its finest. It’s taken fear out of going into week 31 with 7 players. Thanks Ragabolly.

  17. faux_C
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    I was planning to get Pritchard this week, but now with his possible injury should I go for Van La Parra instead do we think?

  18. Herr Dier
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Fantastic bit of research - complex stuff, presented as clearly as possible - respect Ragabolly!

    Seems to confirm a couple of predictions had to make weeks ago; 1) should be more profitable use of FH elsewhere 2) still opportunities to pick up 'free' points on field during GW31 if planned for in advance

    Point 2) only really works if WC intact to play GW32 and reset team for DGW. Also susceptible to missing points in weeks leading up ignoring blanking high scorers, though personally seem to have ridden that well and will have 11 players eligible for GW31.

    Difficult choice this week who to go for though (probably a midfielder, have Mane/Salah/Shaqiri already - Gross or Sterling to go)

  19. Darklord_bg
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great work, thanks.

    Unfortunately it does not help my dilemma much.

    Currently I have 5 GW31 players with 2FTs so I'm on for 7 players, no hits.
    If I understood your analysis correctly, I need to take 2 hits to beat the average of 8.23 players.
    So, if the excepted loss with the average number of players is about 11 points, if I add my 2 hits, that's 11 + 8 = 19 points.

    19 points is not so little - I don't know if it's worth it to lose so much in order to save my FH chip.
    Also, I presume the average 8.23 players need to be the right players.
    For instance, one of my GW31 players is McArthur who is a guaranteed 1-3-pointer (let's say 2-pointer on average).
    I also went for Van Vijk, instead of Mane, since I needed a good replacement for Jones in the weeks coming up to 31. I think for 31 that is a mistake though, since Mane is much more likely to produce a big haul.

    It doesn't help that my ML rival is most definitely going to use his FH chip since he currently has 3 GW31 players.

    I guess I'm one of those people with a 50% chance to use their FH chip...and I still don't know what to do.

    Any advice?

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Yeah it’s a really tough choice for you, I think you do fit in the 50% indeed. It’s mainly up to your gut, if you feel like you can nail the players who will score well in 31 with your free transfers/hits, then no need to FH imo. But if you’re uncertain, FH could be a good option for you. But you also have to think about the use of FH later to manage between dgws and whether that sounds more promising than your situation now.
      To be honest, if I were you, I would just take a couple of hits and pray you hit the jackpot with them. And keep FH for later.

  20. Ragabolly is my new hero - get your chequebook out Sutherns and sign him up permanently! 🙂

    1. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      This.

    2. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks a lot bro, means a lot! I already submitted an application, fingers crossed!

  21. SCZCCOLA
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Lovely analysis Raga. I'm in the top 10K and fall into the category of going with 9 BGW players with no hits and saving FH for later on. I'm hoping no City players doesnt hurt in GW30 and is balanced out by having Hazard and Alonso in my team v Palace.

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Very similar situation myself, top 10k, can get 9 players with no hits, but still have Sterling.. Thinking of giving him a final chance

  22. Gnu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great Article and really interesting read.
    I will digest this later on after work but on first reading it suggests something I posted a couple of weeks ago that not many (10 - 20%) of current top10k are likely to be there at the season end.

    1. Whats the Huth
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Well that's good news. Means that there'll be room for me to sneak into the top 10k haha

  23. Hotdogs for Tea
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great article and a fantastic insight.

    The one thing I would query though is this '' If we generously say a Gameweek 31 player will average 3-4 points, then the advantage of using a FH is around 8-11 points. ''

    Most on FFS for example are not bringing in the best players as part of their 8 players, but are shifting around their existing weakest players for similarly weak players that have a game in 31.

    In my opinion, there are two 'extra overs' to consider, firstly the 'extra' players and secondly the 'better' players that the FH31 provides.

    The RMT tool is throwing out a GW total of 55 - 59 points for the best available in GW31, whereas most teams with 7 or 8 players clocks up at best 35 - 40 points.

    My guess is that the GW31 FH will provide an advantage of 15 - 20 points in the game week itself, and maybe 10 points over GW29 & GW30 due to the better use of transfers and a slightly stronger team 🙂

    1. Pasqualinho
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Possibly - it's all a bit of guesswork as to what it'll be worth.

      But here's some fact - according to FPL Discovery the cumulative points gain since GW10 (haven't gone back any further than this because of laziness, no other reason) is 42.6 points (outlier here is the DGW which gained Top 10kers 14.4 points on average). This means in 20 weeks the average gain was 2.13 points. Kind of makes the 8-11 points estimate seem fairly good.

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        It is all guesswork

        no idea what you are explaining in the rest of your post though, sorry.

        1. Pasqualinho
          • 16 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          Rough guide - Average gain for those in the top 10k using free hit this season is just over 2 points. If the analysis in the article shows that FH in 31 is going to get you at least 8 points then you're doing much better using it this week than the Top 10kers who have gone before you.

          1. Hotdogs for Tea
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 9 months ago

            I don't think that 'average gain' is comparable to this situation ?

            1. Pasqualinho
              • 16 Years
              7 years, 9 months ago

              Why not?

                1. Gnu
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 16 Years
                  7 years, 9 months ago

                  😆

              1. Hotdogs for Tea
                • 10 Years
                7 years, 9 months ago

                The FH Chip is new and had no track record or empirical data for people to rely upon, largely it was wasted, some didn't understand it all and thought it was a 'free' -4 hit (and no -4 was deducted), some didn't know that you received your players back and made just a few changes etc etc ..

                But overall, the FH use in a non-blank game week is ...
                - 11 players v 11
                - auto subs active from the bench
                - captain selection distorting things (it is a binary pick and not really linked to the FH)

                During this blank game week, the difference is ...
                - 7 or 8 players v 11
                - no auto subs active from the bench to deal with injuries and rotation
                - every one (most) on the same captain

                The 2 points you quote as the benefit of the FH Chip is effectively the extra over for a 'better' team of 11 achieved over and above your original team of 11.

                Ragabolly has identified 8 - 11 points as the addition for just the extra players brought in with 3 free transfers, but that does not take into account other FH benefits in the game week ...
                - the extra over for a 'better' team with the FH (the 2 points that you identify ?)
                - the auto sub being active with the FH (2 points?)
                - the fact that of the 5.5 blank players that are already in squads (the starting base point), this probably includes 1.5 player of non-starters such as Kenny, RLC, Niasse, DCL, Palace reserve keeper etc. (one -4 hit or 2 points ?)

                Ragabolly doesn't allow for the above items and this adds 6 points to his 8 - 11 points to take the estimate up to 14 - 17 points.

                But of course it is all just a theoretical guess 🙂

          2. Ragabolly
            • 15 Years
            7 years, 9 months ago

            Fair enough. But the point would be that people who used FH before really blew it. Using FH in 31 might be much more useful than using it earlier, but the real question is is using it later a better option? That’s what I think, using it in 35 hopefully brings more gain than 8-11.

            1. Pasqualinho
              • 16 Years
              7 years, 9 months ago

              Interesting. What is the basis behind getting more than 8-11 in GW35? You seem to be basing the 8-11 points on FHers having 3-4 more players than non FHers, and these 3-4 more players will get about 3 points on average each - which I don't mind as an assumption - seems fair.

              So are you thinking that most people who free hit in GW31 will have less than 8 or 9 players available in GW35? Because I'm not sure that will be the case.

              1. Ragabolly
                • 15 Years
                7 years, 9 months ago

                That’s actually a good question that I don’t have a solid answer for.
                The thing with FH 35 is that the pool of players is much better so even if you have extra 2-3 players than avg, they should average more than GW31 players. People with no FH then will have to take hits go get in those nice players. Then hits again to get rid of them since they won’t have double gameweeks later.
                It’s not very rigorous but it’s more of a gut feeling right now. Might try later to analyze that better with stats.

                1. Pasqualinho
                  • 16 Years
                  7 years, 9 months ago

                  Fair enough. I'm a FH35er so if you do come up with a silver bullet that would be fine by me. One comment on your article (which I do think is brilliant, despite the fact I'm about to pick a hole in it) is that it comes across that GW31 is a bad week to Free Hit. I think it would perhaps be more accurate to conclude that GW31 is a very good week to Free Hit (as that's really what the stats show - 8-11 points is not to be sniffed at) - but maybe GW35 could be better. But you'd need to show your working for 35...

                  1. Ragabolly
                    • 15 Years
                    7 years, 9 months ago

                    Yes you are right. Cheers!

                2. Hotdogs for Tea
                  • 10 Years
                  7 years, 9 months ago

                  There are lots of good players that will have a double in 34 and a game in 35 and I expect to get a very good 11 players out in 35 with perhaps at worst a -4. Also Salah and Firmino in that Liverpool v Bournemouth single fixture, rolling in to an away game against the Baggies in 35, is very enticing. I may risk losing ground in 35 with a lesser 11, but I think I can control the game week without a FH better than I can control GW31.

                  My GW31 FH means that I don't 'need' to WC in GW32 and I will be set up for DGW34 with free transfers. With this in mind, I will WC in 36 (with full knowledge of the 37 fixtures), so will not need any hits to remove any players in GW35 to get the double game week players in 🙂

    2. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      If you look at the numbers from the RMT, you will see that none of the non liverpool players are expected to have over 4 points. It’s a very fair assumption that all teams will have three liverpool players and will captain Salah. So the advantage of using FH, i.e. the 2.5 extra players are not likely to have an average of more than 4 points each indeed.
      Try a team with 8-9 players in the RMT that has the usual pool players and I am sure it won’t be more than 11-15 points below the full team.

      1. Ragabolly
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        I meant 8-12 points

      2. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        a quick effort and I have probably not selected the strongest options ...
        Lossl 3.51
        Coleman 2.95
        Bauer 3.34
        Ake 3.95
        Salah 15.84
        Mane 6.15
        Shaqiri 4.17
        Siggy 3.45
        Firmino 6.48
        Benteke 3.69
        King 3.08
        Total 56.61

        - omit a few players out to give a team of 7, 8 or 9 players
        - down grade a few by a point each to replicate the mix of players being selected
        - take a few points for hits

        I still think that a full FH team will beat the top 10k or overall average by 15 - 20 points on the day, but it is all a guess 🙂

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          oh and throw in an injury or rotation on the day .... no auto-sub bench players to come in as usual 😉

        2. Ragabolly
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          See my point is, take aside Liverpool players who will be in every team, all other players have a smaller average than 4 points, this is by looking at your numbers.
          With the analysis showing FH will have extra 2.5 players than avg, those 2.5 are expected to give 2.5*4 = 10 points and that’s if they average 4 points, might average less.

          1. Ragabolly
            • 15 Years
            7 years, 9 months ago

            Autosubs is a fair point, but still the subs are not expected to bring in more than 4 points, autosubs will probably give a max average gain of 1-2 points extra.

          2. Hotdogs for Tea
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 9 months ago

            Ok

  24. Whats the Huth
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Currently have 6 players. But 3 FT. So I'm in a strong position.
    However - in a slight dilemma. As I have both Son and Sterling, who may not start at the weekend.

    I definitely want a city player this weekend - so if I must, I will sacrifice a GW31 player and switch out either Sterling or Son for another city player and go into GW31 with 8 instead of the planned 9 players

    Lovely work Ragabolly

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I have Sterling too but will monitor how the CL game goes, might keep him if he comes off the bench.

  25. Boomerang V
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Pick 2 out of these gw31:

    A) Benteke
    B) J King
    C) Mounie
    D) Tosun
    E) Other

  26. Stat Sloth
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Wow! Just, wow! I found myself a new favourite FFS author ^^

    Well done, thorough analysis, and interesting read. Keep 'em coming! ^^

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers bro!

  27. Cork Eagle
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Thanks for the work Ragabolly.

    Here's where I'm stuck. If I can plan now (actually have been doing so for a few weeks) to get 13 DGWs for GW34 and a decent 11 out for GW35 (then WC GW36) then the modest gains of my potentially mediocre FH31 seems to be worth it. If I get a typical 60 point haul in GW35 then the FH35ers will have to get 75+ to overtake me. Is there that much confidence in the community that 75+ will be achievable / normal?

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I don’t think the picture for FH on 35 is that clear in our minds tbh. I think your plan is a good alternative, and if you feel like 12 points are good gain given your plan, go for it.

  28. BrutalLogiC
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    hey that was a good read, I have 7 players and will have 2FT which I'll use to get 2 more, article doesn't change my plans but makes me feel better?!

    1. Ragabolly
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Yup

  29. TopMarx
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Really interesting read, thank you.

    I'm not overly surprised that people who have used their Free Hit have less gameweek 31 players and less transfers available.

    As others have mentioned - and indeed Jay in a video of his recently - they have probably been focusing on getting better players who may have a blank in 31. With the idea of making points now and spending them on a hit or two if needed.

    It would also seem to suggest that managers who have used their free hit already are less focused on long term planning, and are maybe the types to make more transfers each week. At this stage they've had some success but I wonder if managers outside the top 10,000 who haven't used their FH (and perhaps other chips too) now have a good chance of catching them.

  30. diesel001
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    I'm in the Top 10k and will have 7 GW31 players most likely without any hits being taken. Seems okay to me. GW31 just full of crap teams IMO.