Scout Notes

Chelsea attackers disappoint ahead of Blank Gameweek 31

Chelsea options put on a largely unconvincing performance in their audition for Blank Gameweek 31 investment.

Despite dominating the shot count against Wolves on Sunday afternoon, they were forced to rescue a late point in dramatic fashion.

With the Blues travelling to Everton next weekend, Fantasy managers will be keen to invest but it’s hard to pick out any options offering acceptable form.

We’ve assessed their best options and how they got on against Wolves in Gameweek 30…

Chelsea 1-1 Wolves

Goals: Eden Hazard (£10.9m) | Raúl Jiménez (£6.8m)

Assists: Willian (£7.1m) | Diogo Jota (£6.1m)

Eden Hazard‘s (£10.9m) dramatic equalising goal was his first scored against a team outside the Premier League relegation zone since Gameweek 19. That is the sort of concerning form the Belgian is in ahead of Blank Gameweek 31, for which he has already been signed by 50,000+ managers. While Hazard was the saviour for Chelsea, his performance against Wolves did not especially inspire confidence in him for Sunday’s trip to Everton.

No player had more touches inside the penalty box at Stamford Bridge in Gameweek 30 than Hazard, but he did not register a single shot there. In fact, his late equaliser was his only effort of the match. Furthermore, two of his colleagues created more chances than him, although none of his colleagues has played as many key passes in the last four Gameweeks. Crucially, all his toils against Wolves made for an expected goals (xG) score of just 0.02.

“Hazard is a great player who can solve the situation in any moment, but during the match, he was like the other players. He needs more movement without the ball, not only when he has the ball at his feet. But this is the same for all the players today, especially the offensive players.” – Maurizio Sarri

Gonzalo Higuaín (£9.6m) continues to frustrate those who jumped on his bandwagon as soon as he arrived in the country. As per usual, the Argentinian racked up the shots against Wolves, registering more than double of any other player on the Stamford Bridge pitch, but quality chances were at a premium. Four of his six efforts were inside the box but just two were on target, but most importantly his xG score for being the game’s top shooter was just 0.34.

Over the last four Gameweeks, just four of Higuaín’s 15 efforts have been accurate, suggesting he still has some work to do. So far, he has only scored against Huddersfield and Fulham, the two worst sides in the division, and will be hoping that Everton can be as obliging in Gameweek 31. Much like Hazard, he goes into the depleted round of fixtures offering a little discouragement for those interested in him.

Despite playing 90 minutes against Dynamo Kyiv, and Willian (£7.1m) getting some rest in the final quarter of that match, Pedro (£6.3m) kept his place against Wolves. He was by far the most influential player on the pitch in the Europa League but was unable to recreate that on Sunday afternoon. Like Hazard, he had just one shot which was taken from outside of the penalty box.

With Chelsea chasing the game from the 56th minute, Maurizio Sarri was forced into some changes in the second half. Matteo Kovačić (£5.7m) had been largely anonymous during his time on the pitch and was replaced by Ruben Loftus-Cheek (£5.2m) for the final 35 minutes of the match. The England international made a decent impact with his drive from midfield and added some goal threat too. Despite his limited pitch-time, only Higuaín finished the afternoon with more shots in the box than Loftus-Cheek, who also created the same number of chances as Hazard did at Stamford Bridge.

The consistency Loftus-Cheek has shown in his rare appearances for Chelsea this season should probably see him start in Blank Gameweek 31, especially with Kovačić and Ross Barkley (£5.1m) offering little in recent weeks. We will have to see how heavily he is involved in Thursday’s Europa League trip to Ukraine first though. Callum Hudson-Odoi (£4.2m) was also added to the fray at Pedro’s expense but was unable to contribute as much as Loftus-Cheek.

“We started (the substitutions) with Loftus-Cheek because, in my opinion, we needed more physical impact in the opposition box. Then Odoi because it was impossible to change our match in that moment of the match, so it was really very important to have a player very able in one against one. Then, in the end, we changed for the first time in the season the system, and played 4-2-3-1 for the last 20 minutes. But it’s not easy, of course, because the problem wasn’t the system, but our way of playing. We need to move the ball faster. We cannot play five or six touches in that situation. It’s very difficult to score if you do.” – Maurizio Sarri

Probably to the encouragement of some, Sarri’s favouring of Jorginho (£4.7m) continued to wane against Wolves. The Italian was substituted around the 70-minute mark for the second Premier League match in a row. According to the manager, this was not because he was necessarily playing poorly but because of the movement of those around Jorginho not helping him play his game. It must be said that the former Napoli midfielder changed some of the perception around him with his performance against Wolves. He has been criticised for playing too many sideways passes this season but was often looking for direct forward balls to Higuaín and Pedro in Gameweek 30, who squandered the opportunities that fell their way. Jorginho was still too slow in the way he distributed the ball but this was a display from Chelsea that demonstrated that he is not the only one to blame for their problems in possession in 2018/19.

“Jorginho, if the other players don’t move without the ball, is in trouble. He is really very able to play at one touch, but if you want to play one touch you need movements from the other players. Then, in the last 20 minutes, Jorginho is not suitable for 4-2-3-1. So it was only a consequence of the change of system, not the performance. I know him very well. He can go in trouble if all the rest of the team are not moving.” – Maurizio Sarri

David Luiz (£5.9m) was back in the side after being benched for Gameweek 29, but it was another match that suggested defence is the wrong area to cover for Chelsea in the Blank Gameweeks. Wolves had just one shot inside the penalty box all afternoon and it found the back of the net. Having failed to keep a clean sheet even against out-of-form Fulham, there has not been much to inspire confidence in Chelsea’s back-line from a Fantasy perspective of late.

Marcos Alonso‘s (£6.4m) stock continues to fall after he was omitted from the matchday squad for the second Premier League match in a row. That is the first time that the Spaniard has missed back-to-back Gameweeks all season, as it appears clear that he has slipped down the pecking order. Sarri has previously explained that when Alonso is not chosen for the starting XI, it makes sense not to include him among the substitutes as left-back is not a position he wants to cover on the bench. Emerson Palmieri (£5.2m) made his second consecutive Premier League start against Wolves and looks very much to be competing for the left-back slot now.

The explanation for Hazard, Higuaín and their colleagues’ struggles in Gameweek 30 may have actually had more to do with Wolves than with Chelsea. The newly-promoted side have been especially impressive when they have played top-six sides this season, beating Spurs and Chelsea earlier in the campaign, and holding both Manchester clubs to draws, and now Sarri’s men on their own patch.

Particularly fond of the big sides is striker Raúl Jiménez (£6.8m) who scored Wolves’ goal at Stamford Bridge. That was his the seventh he has been involved in from nine appearances against top-six opposition this season, scoring four strikes of his own and assisting another three. For all of Chelsea’s efforts on goal, no player managed a higher xG score in the match than Jiménez, converting what proved to be the most clear-cut chance of the afternoon, although it was still an excellent finish to get it past Kepa Arrizabalaga (£5.4m).

“It’s different now. They (Jota and Jimenez) have less support, less players in the movement, but Diogo and Raul were able to do a fantastic combination and score a very beautiful goal.” – Nuno Espirito Santo

Despite claims to the contrary by Sarri, Wolves’ defence was very well organised at Stamford Bridge, led by captain Conor Coady (£4.5m), with Willy Boly (£4.6m). This has been a recurring theme of their matches against top-six sides this season, which may hold some hope for those invested in Chelsea attacking options for Blank Gameweek 31. Considering that only Fulham have conceded more shots in the box in the last four home matches as Everton, the Blues are likely to face a more obliging defence next weekend compared to Gameweek 30.

“What I see every day (from Conor Coady) is a fantastic player – a fantastic player and a captain. First-half we were well organised, not allowing many things to Chelsea, who are a very good team and had possession of the ball, but we were closing the gaps and staying compact. We tried to take our chances when we got them.” – Nuno Espirito Santo

Chelsea XI (4-3-3): Kepa; Emerson, D Luiz, Rüdiger, Azpilicueta; Kovačić (Loftus-Cheek 56′), Jorginho (Willian 72′), Kanté; Hazard, Higuaín, Pedro (Hudson-Odoi 61′).

Wolverhampton Wanderers XI (3-5-2): Patrício; Boly, Coady, Saïss; Jonny, Joao Moutinho, Neves, Dendoncker, Doherty; Jota (Gibbs-White 82′), Jiménez (Traoré 89′).

823 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Hit-rithmetic
    Legomané
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    OK...I'm just gonna say it...

    If the rule of thumb for taking a hit in a normal BGW is that it's just a...
    -4 + 2 (appearance pts) = "-2"

    Then (if playing FH32)..
    Taking a hit in BGW31 for a BGW31+33 player is just gonna be a
    -4 + 2 + 2 = "0"

    Ok..so who's with me?! 🙂

    2x caveats and a note :
    • you get a FT in GW33, so your "last hit" is really a "-2" not a "0"
    • any players you own from MCI* TOT* ARS WAT* BHA* CPL* SOU CAR* will potentially play GW33, "-2" applies
    (*subject to FA Cup results)

    Finally, small warning :
    Selling popular high appreciation players such as Pogba/Rashford /Jimenez/Doherty is fine if you have little or no intention of bringing them back into your squad...or have little value tied up...
    But be aware that selling off this acquired value may hamper re-acquisition in future gameweeks
    e.g. I've sold Pogba and currently it'll cost me an extra 0.1 to buy back - Jimenez on the other hand will cost me 0.6 to buy back in GW32 if sold now.

    1. Pras (FPL)
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Lots of people miss the FT in 33. So agree with you - but getting in an 11th player who is a crappy defender and justifying it as “free” is wrong

      1. Legomané
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah, my targets are Hazard/Higuain/Wilson (1FT and a -8) - hopeful of some explosive returns 🙂

        1. Pras (FPL)
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Absolutely worth the “free” hits instead of a “free hit”

      2. Richd
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        The cool thing about the -2 for a 33 is if you have say a Newcastle player there’s a 50/50 chance they have a 33 game or not.. so is that -2 now a -1 ? 😉

      3. Pras (FPL)
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        And after reading properly - I see you rightly say this is the first caveat 🙂

    2. Richd
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      This is my issue

      I’d be selling Sterling Kun Son and Jiminez for my -8

      The first three could all play 33. Unlikely but possible at the same time

      Jiminez I have 0.6 invested in

      Messy times. Just gotta YOLO that right ?!

      1. Scholes Out For Summer
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I just wouldnt do the -8...

        Theres gotta be other players you can transfer out

    3. Bobby Digital
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      All transfers cost 4pts when it comes down to it imo.

      1. Richd
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        That’s far too simplistic though. Have to look at the games as a block of games.

    4. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      This is why I'm not selling Jimi

      1. Richd
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        If you avoid say wilson to save Jiminez value it could backfire twice.

        1) Wilson could outscore your empty slot by 20+ points in 31 and 33 combined. Some amazing value strikers for those weeks

        2) you could have an additional 0.6 to spend so let’s say you invest in the more expensive of a 50/50 flip cos one guy is 0.5 more. You could get stung by that. Yeah it can work both ways but price doesn’t guarantee points

        1. brianutd-why always we? 20
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Lots of coulds in there

    5. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      if they get injured or suspended or score -ve pts in GW31, dont think it will be -2 in that case 😉

    6. circusmonkey
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I'm with you 100%. Lots of people on here not getting it.

    7. Mysterion
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Third caveat: can't ignore negative points like YC, RC, goals conceded for defenders, etc.

      1. Mysterion
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Ricardo Pereira will probably turn into a package deal of all of the above

        1. Amey
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Reverse Jinx ??
          😛

          1. Mysterion
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Needs all the help he can get... but still expecting 0, 2, 0 in GW31, 32, 33

            1. Amey
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Ha ha
              0 & 0 in both gw's we need him then.
              At least we'll be happy if he returns as we have no expectations 😛

        2. Pras (FPL)
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          You mean Digne

    8. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Yep agreed.
      I won't take a hit to get a defender.
      But i have taken one hit + 2 FT for below swap:
      Raz+Pogba+Kamara >> Vardy+Fraser+Hazard

      I think it's a good move because all are attacking player's with ability to repay a hit on their own basis.

      But yeah, won't take a hit to get a defender not playing for Liverpool

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Ok, great minds think alike 🙂

          1. Legomané
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            yeah, maybe lead with that next time 😆 😆 😆

            1. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              😉

    9. seewhyaxe
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      i already have 10 players, so the 11th player is not really 'free' as i have a ft for gw33 to be used.

      i shall just stick with 10

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Your free transfer in 33 may be needed for injury or rotation though 😉

        I would keep that one up my sleeve though to maybe get an Arsenal, Palace or Spurs player

    10. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I think the upside of 2 games for a -4 m, against zero games and no points, is compelling - especially for a good nailed attacker in the £6.5 - £11 mill bracket

    11. Numb
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I think most will probably end up with 11 in 33 even if they have, say, 10 in 31. But yeah, I agree with what you’re saying for the most part.

    12. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Still 4 points per hit you take versus people who have 11 having not taken a hit 🙂

      1. Legomané
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Indeed - this was something I weighed up the week before last when bringing in Rahz - as I knew it would result in an extra hit into GW31.

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          For me, you score well over 2000 points over the course of a season, so a hit that costs less than 0.2% of your total points to have more players and more fun has to be worth the price.

          1. Legomané
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            The cost of not owning the likes of Wilson/Hazard and co, could be far more costly - will be watching the green and red arrows closely this week!

        2. Amey
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Same. Ignored Hazard & chose Raz for an extra future hit.
          It has paid off handsomely 😉

      2. EMBOLOFAN
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        this doesnt mean anything

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Yes dear

          1. EMBOLOFAN
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            imagine im competing against you. i can either take a -4 to field a player who should return an expected 4+ plus, or i can field nobody vs your 11. which am i going to do

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Post an RMT?

    13. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Of course it’s still -4, but you have a much better chance of recouping the -4 over 2 games ... if you averaged out all the -4 hits in the gameweek I reckon it would work out as a free transfer 🙂

      1. EMBOLOFAN
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        would average out better than that

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Yes, I think so too, so still a free transfer 🙂

    14. EMBOLOFAN
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      great post

    15. jtreble
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I would add another caveat: "- has to be (a) player(s) you would want/keep in your team."

      1. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        FH32 WC 34 ?

      2. EMBOLOFAN
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        most people are wildcarding afterwards

      3. Teddy Brewski
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        No it doesn't. WC34 very much in play

      4. jtreble
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Apologies; didn't finish my sentence: "- has to be (a) player(s) you would want/keep in your team if no WC."

    16. Westfield Irons ⭐️
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Good points LEGOMANÉ.
      I am looking for good reasons to sel Jiminez for BGW31 despite losing all the value tied up.
      First Jiminez blanks in GW33.
      When playing FH32, my subs total value can be around 15.6 (minimum) as opposed to probably average 16.6 (and I think I can be confident I won't need a sub to come on)
      So by downgrading the bench I've got back a chunk of what I lost when I FH32 Jiminez back in my team.
      Are you with me?
      Long term - happy to downgrade elsewhere for WC34 team or any later team....

      1. Legomané
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah - I don't want to sell Jimenez, having bought at 5.6 (>6.8), and likely want to own GW32 - but, the thought of going without one of Higuain, Vardy and Wilson is troubling this week and 33. Want them all - can easily get them all this week funds wise. Still hurting from not making the Auba > Aguero switch in GW25 which cost me dearly - feels similar in some respects - he who dares!

    17. Bellybig
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      except that a -4 is still a -4 in your ML. If your rival has 10 players while you only have 9, a hit to match his quantity is still a -4.

      I would love for all the teams around me to take those so-called -2 hits.

      1. the Penman
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah, but you’re behind anyway - without the hit you remain the same amount behind, with the hit you remain the same amount behind (assuming everyone plays 60+ mins) and have the opportunity to pick the right player to get more points than your rival. It’s a win-“not-lose” scenario.

      2. Legomané
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        You can look at it both ways. I choose to look at if through the lens of my own unique team. I see low risk low cost value moves to be made for potential high value returns. Hopefully my 80(-8) eclipses your 65 😉

        1. Moore Rovers
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Good luck getting 80 in BGW31!
          *prepares to eat hat

    18. Rover
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Fully agree! I've already done Aguero and Jimenez to Vardy and Wilson with my two free transfers. And I'm planning to sell Jota and Shaw to bring in Fraser + Robertson or Mane + Daniels for a -8.

      That gives me 10 players for 31, and maybe 11 for 33 since AWB/Hayden/Son could end up with a fixture. And with the FT in 33, I'm planning to either make up the 11, or make a one week goalkeeping punt before WC.

    19. WesMantooth
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Not that it matters this week, because looking at this week alone, your logic is sound. But really, all -4s are minus four. For most people its been quite possible to avoid the minuspoints they are taking this week, through managing their FT's differently the last couple of gwks. Im not saying that was their best play. Using FT's on other targets than players with a game in 31 might have yeilded a lot of points, but its also whats ultimately led to the situation of having to use hits to get 10/11 players this week.

    20. jia you
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      It was in my head anyway to take a hit to swap Son out for Fraser to field XI (without a wildcard) so your post has made me feel better about this, Cheers 🙂

    21. noquarternt
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      If you’re taking a hit to get a really highly owned player by your ML or around your OR, it’s not a -2 or a -0. You’re just putting yourself 4 points behind those who already own them. Admittedly you won’t fall further behind, but you won’t gain anything on them, just cement yourself slightly behind.

      1. Twisted Saltergater
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Exactly this. So many people are assuming there aren't other teams with 11 *without hits* for GW31 and 33.

        If the question is, is it worth taking a hit to transfer out someone who doesn't play GW31 and 33 for someone who does play, then yes, it almost certainly is, but you're still losing -4 on someone who already has that player.

    22. WesMantooth
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I'm just hoping one of the players in fashion this week comes in with a -1 or -2 score (cards, penaltymiss, goals conceded etca), and wait for people to talk about how getting 11 this week actually cost them 5-6pts and possibly an extra transfer in 33. Then something about how they will avoid doing the same mistake next year.

    23. azahr007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      So which teams are definitely blanking 31 and 33

  2. KUNingas
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    FH32, WC34. Currently have 9 players for GW31. Jimenez -> Wilson worth a hit? Would also help my GW33 squad.

    1. caldracula
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah

  3. caldracula
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Who do you think will score more over 31/33

    Fraser, Vardy + Higuain -4

    Anderson, Wilson + Vardy

    Thanks

    1. KUNingas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Latter

    2. micsway
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      B

    3. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      B

    4. caldracula
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Thanks all

    5. Moore Rovers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Wilson to outscore Fraser, yeah probably. But Fanderson to outscore Higuain? (Vardy being the constant here). Surely not.

  4. It's his Job.
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Do I just roll with this team no Hits taken yet

    Fabs
    Robbo Digne Luiz
    Salah((C) Anderson Almiron Mane
    Arnautovic

    Boruc/Pogba/Rashford/Kolasinac/Jiminez

    1. KUNingas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Depends how much value tied up

      1. It's his Job.
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        3.0 itb
        I just feel with the Man utd and Wolves dgw the following week it seems pointless shipping any of them out and apart from what I have I cannot see many more points coming my way gw31.

    2. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I'd get a Bmouth forward in

      1. It's his Job.
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        King or Wilson?

        1. Pukki Party
          • 6 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Wilson

          1. reddragons178
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            This

  5. Nomar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Vardy or Barnes?

    Burnley should score at home and keep a CS.

    1. Dave Bauer
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      You’ve answered your own question there, it would seem.

    2. caldracula
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Burnley haven't kept a clean sheet at home in a while, I would go Vardy.

    3. Scholes Out For Summer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Both sides will likely score. Leicester not great at the back but really sharp attack

    4. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Should have said Burnley could keep a CS. No guarantee they will.

      Burnley almost certainly will score.

      Tough call, this one. Barnes may be a good differential over Vardy this GW.

  6. Dybala10
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Who is the best option in the Leicester midfield for 31 and 33?

    A) Maddison
    B) Tielemans
    C) Barnes

    1. caldracula
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Not much it in really, probably A or B.

    2. Bobby Digital
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Maddison probably because of set pieces

    3. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      A

    4. g40steve
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      A

      Posted this yesterday & B got more hits?
      Do they watch the games?

  7. Klein
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Hazard or brooks?

    1. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Haz.

      1. g40steve
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Will troll

    2. micsway
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      context?

      1. Klein
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Have a lot itb. 1 spot. So just looking at points mainly

  8. juho
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    If I'm of the view that Palace plays Newcastle in GW33, is it a bad move to replace AWB with a BOU defender this week for a hit?

    Palace will play City and Arsenal in GW34 and 35.

    (I'm without WC, but still planning to FH in GW32.)

    1. POKE JOHN BALLS THE SECOND
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Good plan . Go ahead

  9. Scholes Out For Summer
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Snodgrass --> Brooks for -4

    Yay or nay? Not sure if Snoddy will even play but Brooks not exactly very likely for an attacking return either

    Thanks for the help lads

    1. Dave Bauer
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Maybe for free, but I wouldn’t take a hit for that.

      1. Scholes Out For Summer
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah wasnt sure if Brooks could cover to even break even tbh

    2. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No.

      Snoddy could haul this weekend

      1. Scholes Out For Summer
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Its hit or miss innit

        Got him for the past 8 and 6 pointers which was really nice, but didnt even play against MCI. Who knows with Nasri and Lanzini back too.

        1. Nomar
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Wouldn't take any West Ham players out directly before they're home to "Shuddersfield".

          1. Scholes Out For Summer
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Fair point. Will reassess for GW 33. Cheers!

    3. circusmonkey
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No

  10. Dave Bauer
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Is there any concern over Wilson starting this weekend given how long he was out?

    1. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Probably not. He played 90mins last time out

  11. MysticMac17
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    MY FH team this week:

    Fabianski
    Azpi Van Dijk Rice
    Hazard Salah Mane Fraser
    Vardy Higuaín Wilson

    Subs: Lossl, Snodgrass, Daniels, Tarkowski

    Gone with VVD over Robbo/TAA based on security. There's a part of me that wants to swap Azpi with another West Ham defender. Thoughts?

    1. micsway
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      triple hammers defence is mad, I had the same choice, when I came to my senses.

      I'm trying to decide if Higuaín deserves a selection or or Anderson vs. the Hud defence deserves a roll of the dice.

    2. circusmonkey
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Look at the clean sheet odds, west ham have highest % chance.

    3. Bat Man
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Good team same for me except Robbo instead of VVD.

    4. Jigger & Pony
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Robbo instead of VVD and consider Ake over Azpi.

    5. DT42
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Mine’s almost identical but I’m debating
      Liv Def + Higuan
      Or
      Che def + Firmino

  12. TaiwanHC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Let's assume that City beat Swansea.

    That would mean that City vs Cardiff in GW33 will be rescheduled.

    Let's assume you will FH in GW32 and WC in GW34.

    City blank in GW30.

    Is there any logic to keep any City players unless you have a lot of value attached to them?

    Thanks guys!

    1. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No.

      1. TaiwanHC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Exactly my thinking, but nice to get it confirmed.

        Thanks!

    2. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      If you have a lot of value yes, if not then no

    3. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No logic to keep a City player at all ... £10 mill on the bench for 2 games to preserve a bit of TV, or Hazard/Vardy for 2 games ? .... mmm ....

      1. Michelle Davin
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Great point ,will prob kick out sterling and jiminez instead of pogba and jimenez

  13. Forza Napoli
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Is Jimenez to Rondon (-4) worthwhile?

    1. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      For me no, but if you have no money tied up then maybe

  14. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    just realizing that if I do Pogba & Kun > Mane & Vardy I am priced out of buying them back in 🙁

    should I just just do it so i have 10 playing this week or just do Kun > Vardy so I can buy him back for GW32?

    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      You are using FH in gw32 ??
      If yes i don't see an issue as we can bin Costly pool asset's for all dgw player's.
      #Just Saying

      1. the dom 1
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        yep using FH 32 Amey!

        1. the dom 1
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          BTW that would be for a -4

  15. Bat Man
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    If I have 2 FT and use Free Hit, I will only have 1 FT for gw32??? Sounds ridiculous that Free Hit wipes out all your FTs even if you saved?

    1. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Yup that's the rules

  16. No Luck
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Is Kolasinac -> Luiz/Chilwell etc worth -4 when it's for GW31 only?

    Fab, Hamer;
    Robertson, TAA, Doherty, Pereira, Kolasinac;
    Hazard, Mane, Pogba, Richarlison, Fraser;
    Vardy, Jimenez, Rondon. £5.4m itb.

    1. jtreble
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No IMHO. Look at ARS' last eight GWs

      1. No Luck
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yeah that's what I'm thinking too.

        Could do Jimi -> Higuain/Wilson -4 instead and bench Rich in GW33. But I'd lose £0.6m... Again not appetising 🙁

    2. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I wouldn't

      1. No Luck
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers, leaning that way!

  17. Bubbles1985
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Fab
    Robertson Luiz Digne
    Mane(c) Almiron Anderson(vc) Lanzini
    Vardy Firmino Jiminez

    Button Sterling WanB Doherty

    I have 0.7m itb and 1ft...

    I have all chips available and will be using FH in GW32

    Am I stupid to be considering changing Jiminez to Wilson this week?!

  18. Rhodes your boat
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Boruc
    Robbo taa pereira
    Salah
    Higuain Barnes

    Hamer jonny bednarek sterling pogba son guendouzi success

    Sterling and success to hazard and Wilson -4?

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I would do it. The more attack minded players the more % chance of at least one them scoring well.

  19. TaiwanHC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Pick one:

    A. Hazard + Maddison + Fraser + Vardy
    B. Hazard + Maddison + Fraser + Higuain
    C. Hazard + Maddison + Fraser + Wilson

    Thanks guys!

    1. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      A

    2. Gudjohnsen
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      B because I want you to experience the pain of owning Gonzalo.

      1. g40steve
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        LOL

    3. Rhodes your boat
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      A

    4. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      C

  20. Klein
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Hey guys. What is the condition for son to play gw33? Thinking of keeping him and doing pucheon to brooks instead.

    1. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Brighton need to lose to Millwall and Son needs to get picked by Poch.

      1. Klein
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks buddy. Slim then right?

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I wouldn't say slim, but certainly less than 50%.

    2. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Isn't it Brighton to beat Milwall or something?

      1. No Luck
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        For Son not to play

    3. WVA
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Brighton need to lose their cup game

  21. Gudjohnsen
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Had the most ridiculous dream last night when I dreamt that Felipe Anderson scored four goals against Huddersfield and I still couldn't enjoy it because the armband wasn't on him.

    Maybe it's time I take this game a little less seriously.

    1. Klein
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Or you could stop dreaming?

  22. L S P
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    What Would You Do?

    a) Etheridge/Rashford->Boruc/Wilson (-4)(11 for 31)
    b) Pogba/Rashford->Fraser/Higuain(-4)(10 for 31 - no GK)
    c) Etheridge/Pogba/Rashford->Boruc/Hazard/Wilson (-8, 11 for 31)

    FH32, WC 34

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      If not bothered about taking the hits I'd go for (c).

    2. Klein
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Honestly it depends on who else is playing in your team. If they are good i like A
      If they are bench fodders i like C

      1. L S P
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Team with A:

        (Boruc)
        TAA-Luiz-Digne-Pereira
        Salah-Mane-FAnderson-Hayden
        Vardy-(Wilson)

        Button-Pogba-Kola-Jimi

        With C:

        (Boruc)
        TAA-Luiz-Digne-Pereira
        Salah-Mane-(Hazard)-Fanderson
        Vardy-(Wilson)

        Button-HAYDEN-Kola-Jimi

    3. EMBOLOFAN
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      keeper is least valuable option

      1. L S P
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        i largely agree which got me thinking about just playing 10 and if i was going to take a hit, do it to add MID & FWD

        But I like the sound of Hazard/Wilson more than Fraser/Higuain and would need to do Eth->Boruc to make that happen.

  23. Old Gregg
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Hello,
    Planning FH 32 at the mo.

    Fab
    Luiz-Taa- Rice
    Brooks-Haz-Salah -Mane
    Vardy

    is it worth a -8.

    a) Wilson (-4)
    b) Wilson + Lanzini (-8)
    c) Wilson + Higuian (-8)
    d) Wilson + Arnie (-8)

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Definitely (a);
      Doubts over playing time of Lanzini and Arnautovic; not that keen on Higuain.

    2. EMBOLOFAN
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      would do A and add C with ft before 33

      1. Old Gregg
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        thanks both.
        yeah the v Cardiff fixture is very appealing.

  24. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    whats the chances of Kun & Stirling dropping in value before GW32?

    pretty slim right??

    1. WVA
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Kun looks very likely to drop already on -80

      1. the dom 1
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        so best ship him now before he drops to Vardy then?

        1. WVA
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I am trying to wait for midweek games but will be doing exactly that.

          1. the dom 1
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            same here

  25. After Supper Ghost Stories
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Hi, could I have your advice please:

    Rondon or Barnes?

    No other Newcastle or Burnley players; will have Vardy and Wilson too.

    Thanks.

    1. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Both got half decent stats. Rondon to chase last week's points. Barnes if you want a definite starter in GW33.

      1. After Supper Ghost Stories
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Thank you

  26. UnitednationsXI
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    - Currently have 10 Gw31 players but that includes trash like hayden/schindler and injury doubts in lascelles/TAA
    - Got 2FTs and 0.1m
    - i am thinking of taking either hayden/schindler out for a hit. worth it or am i mad? i am hoping i will recoup it over gw31/33..

    Fabianski
    Digne Pereira Lascelles TAA Schindler
    Salah Rich Hayden Sterling -- Pogba
    King -- Aguero Jimenez

    A: Sterling + Hayden >> Hazard + Brooks
    B: Sterling + Aguero >> Hazard + Vardy
    C: Sterling + Hayden + Aguero >> Hazard + Fraser + Vardy (-4)
    D: Sterling + Hayden + Aguero >> Hazard + Mane + Wilson (-4)
    E: Sterling + Schindler + Aguero >> Hazard + Robbo + Vardy (-4)

    1. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      B or C

  27. Park the bus
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    not seeing many RMTs for free hits - is it a case of people already having used chips or opting to use in another GW? i have 7 players (Robertson Digne Pereira Anderson Salah Rondon Vardy), could get 9 with a -4. had always planned a free hit but now considering holding. thoughts?

    1. jtreble
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Use in another GW.

    2. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      not really worth using FH if you can get 9 players

    3. HamezMace
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      When you say you've not seen many FH RMTs, have you been on the forum at all?
      Chip use, FH31, or FH32 is pretty much the only topic of conversation.

      1. Park the bus
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        sorry - skimmed through 2 pages of comments there and only saw 1. this time last year it was littered with posts. maybe just on at the wrong time. sincere apologies ......

        1. HamezMace
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          No need to apologise my friend.
          But yeah, it's very much a talking point. Most FH32 it seems, which explains the lack of RMTs.

    4. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      personally save FH for a DGW imo

    5. Jigger & Pony
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      No it’s more because the FH31 template is set. Not much to RMT or tinker.

      1. Jigger & Pony
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        You have just 3 players compared to the FH31 template btw.

  28. rnrd
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    on a FH on 32 and WC on 34, would you

    Son --> Fraser
    Shaw --> D.Luiz

    for -4 to cover 31 and 33 ?

    1. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      depends how many playing this GW mate?

      1. rnrd
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        9
        but I might not have the required 3 def on 33 (AWB, shaw, Chambers, TAA and Doherty) if I don't bring any def. So It would make sense to bring it just right now

  29. #FPLBhuna
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    blimey, everyone has basically got the same teams.

    1. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Fabianski
      Clyne, Schindler, Van Dijk, yedlin
      Salah, xxx, xxx. Mane
      Rondon, Vardy

      yeah, basically same as everyone... cant expect much variance in weeks like this.

    2. Vobinho
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      FH31 is a shield, FH32 is a Sword...

      1. No Luck
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        FH31 is a mistake lol, FH32+WC34 is the shield, your captains are your swords

        1. Vobinho
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          WC28 was my Sword from 28-30, I'll have to use a sofa as my shield in 34 & 35...

          1. No Luck
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Lol amen

    3. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Same teams again in FH32 and same teams again in GW33 and same again in WC34. Then a couple of ballsy differential captains for the run in to tumble down the ranks and then regret all summer.

    4. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Well because there’s only 5 fixtures and a couple of players in a few teams that people actually want. The rest are fillers so there isn’t a huge amount of real choice

    5. Alnair
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Hence why FH32 is better. If you FH31 you're just getting in a highly owned team anyway.

  30. Tosa86
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    My FPL team:

    fabianski
    vvd - robertson - pereira lascelles
    billing - hazard - salah (c) - F.Anderson
    vardy (vC) - rondon

    etherdige - doherty - jimenez - pogba

    My idea:
    GW 31 -> don't move.
    GW32 --> rondon, anderson --> rashford, midfielder 6.6.

    good idea?who as midfielder?deulofeu?