Community
6 August 2019 55 comments
SDC SDC
Share:

“I don’t want to be one of those easily forgotten people, so important at the time, so special, so influential, and so treasured, yet years later just a vague face and a distant memory.”

The new trend seems to be spending big at the back and cheap up front. Many RMTs have 4-5-1/5-4-1 with only one mid-price forward. Even teams with two forwards are also considering two mid-price forwards. This is mainly because of the value for money the premium defenders and midfielders offer compared to the premium forwards. As a result, the love for the Premium Forward is perhaps at an all-time low this season.

This article looks at why we should not ignore the Premium Forwards:

1. You don’t have to own the same premium forward for the entire season

One of the reasons why premium forwards are not in many RMTs is because those managers are arguing that spending so much money for a forward who barely manage to score 200 points (only Aubameyang and Aguero crossed 200 points) is not at all value for money whereas the premium midfielders easily crossed 200 points mark (Salah 259 points, Sterling 234 points, Mane 231 points). Even defenders with significantly less price scored 200 points (Robertson 213 points, VVD 208 points).

However, you do not need to keep them in your team for the entire season. This is not FPL Draft where you need to pick the player for the entire season, this is FPL. We get Transfers. We just need to have them during the right times, and history shows that they do have a period in which they score a lot. Aguero in the opening gameweeks of last season, Aubameyang during the festive periods, Aguero again during Manchester City’s first double gameweek period, Vardy during the final Gameweeks of last season. Not just last season; remember the time of Kanexit in 2017/18 season or when Kane was scoring for fun in the final Gameweeks of 2016/17 season to win the Golden Boot.

Owning these players at the correct time will massively boost our rankings, while not having them can result in massive red arrows.

This point was even discussed in a recent hot topic by FFS user Valar (Keith):

“At the end of the day we have transfers to use and some ppl forget that. Sure a 6.5 million defender will outscore a 6.5 attacker over the season. But if timed correctly, transferring out attackers in and out over a season based on form and fixtures is the way to go. Happens every season.”

2. Team Structure

One of the drawbacks of not having a premium forward in your team is that if one of the premium forward starts with a bang (like Aguero did last season),Β  then because of the team structure you will need multiple transfers/wildcard to get them in your team. It might not be an issue for those who are planning an early wildcard, but for those who are not they might be in the back foot early in the season.

3. Captaincy

Never captain a defender they said. Very well said!

Captaining Shane Duffy in last season’s Double Gameweek still haunts many managers. Having a premium forward gives managers the option having another player to give the armband. Not many will captain Laporte or Walker for a Manchester City fixture which seems an easy affair on paper. Despite all the heroics of TAA and Robertson, very few will give them the armband consistently.

Sure, some managers will plan of having Salah as permanent captain and leave it there. However, for other manager that might be a bit boring and want a more dynamic approach, then the Premium Forward gives them another captaincy choice. And remember, even Salah had a period last season when he was struggling to score.

4. 3-4-3 /3-5-2 have historically been the most successful formations

3-4-3 and 3-5-2 have historically been the most successful formations. Past FPL winners have more often than not won with these two formations, and these formations generally have at least one premium forward. Some recent analysis and research in FFS have shown that for the past 2-3 seasons 4-4-2 is also a successful formation, but in general 3-4-3 & 3-5-2 have been the most successful formations.

5. Attacking full backs/wing backs need the forwards to score for getting the assist

Another argument why people are going with defense heavy approach is because modern day full backs and wing backs are a lot more attacking and thereby they can get points on both sides of the pitch. There are many ways in which they get attacking returns, but mainly they get their attacking points via assists. And this is where it is a symbiotic process. The attacking full backs/wing backs need the forwards (mostly) to score so that they can get their assist. Kolasinac mainly gets assist when – Aubameyang /Lacazette scores. Similarly, Mendy – Aguero, Alonso – Costa, Trippier – Kane in the previous seasons.

There are some teams where the wingers/attacking midfielders score more than the forwards and as a result the assists of the full backs are not so dependent on the forwards (for example Liverpool and Everton), but in general attacking full backs/wing backs need the forwards to score. So when they get attacking points there are more chances that Striker from that team will also get attacking points.

6. VAR

VAR will be introduced in the Premier League for 2019/20 season and there has already been analysis of how this might affect FPL. Some argue that VAR might lead to more penalties, while some argue the otherwise. In this article, let us assume that the glass is half full and there will be more penalties. In that case, it further increases the appeal of the premium forwards. Aguero is the designated penalty taker for Manchester City, Aubameyang /Lacazette for Arsenal, Kane for Tottenham, Vardy for Leicester. More spot kicks for the Top teams mean more chances for Premium Forwards to score more points.

7. 2018/19 Season: Exception or Example of what to come?

One of the reasons why many managers are going heavy at back is because of the events that transpired last season. Liverpool kept 21 clean sheets, whereas Manchester City kept 20 clean sheets. But it is very rare to see a team keep 20 clean sheets a season, let alone 2 teams. Also for the first time last season, a team scored 97 points and did not win the League, the most points ever for a team which finished runners-up. Although it looks like these two teams will again go Head-to-Head for the League title, but whether or not they can sustain the extraordinary heights they reached last season defensively (and as a whole) or suffer some regression and return to the mean remains to be seen.

8. Explosiveness

Nothing feels better in FPL than having a player in the team who can score heavily in a particular Gameweek. Moreover, having him as captain adds cherry on top of the cake and that is not even mentioning the prospect of having him as Triple Captain. Premium Forwards, unlike their cheaper alternatives are much more explosive and having the correct one at the right time can give a massive boost to your gameweek rank.

As with any approach in FPL, there is no guarantee that it will succeed. However, from the above points that I discussed it looks there are more pros than cons of selecting a Premium Forward.

PS – Now that I have mentioned why a manager should consider signing a premium forward, sit back and see how they perform poorly πŸ˜›

55 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Rotation's Alter Ego
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Thank you for posting SDC

    It's interesting to see so few teams with any premium forwards in them - I certainly expected to see a lot less, but not as infrequently as I do. Auba should definitely be in more teams from my point of view and he's in fact very close to getting into mine. Preseason goals against Real Madrid, Lyon and Barcelona plus an assist against Bayern is no easy task and I can see him continuing his good form from the end of the last season.

    If one of these guys do explode, we could see a massive surge in early wildcards!

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      It's simply a case of the S's. Trying to cram a premium forward into a squad with Salah and Sterling doesn't work well. Let one of them go and you're good. By taking Salah out of my squad I've got 5 OOP midfielders, Auba and Wilson.

      1. changler
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        What's your team? πŸ˜‰

      2. LangerznMash
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Amen brother.

    2. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thank You for publishing the article Rotation's Alter Ego πŸ™‚

    3. jtreble
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      SDC, did you read Hedge's two recent FFS articles on value?

      1. SDC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Hi JTREBLE, yes mate read those two articles and they make good points. In this article I just mentioned the pros of having a premium forward. At the end of the day, every manager has his own style and that's what makes this game so fascinating πŸ™‚

        1. jtreble
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 5 months ago

          Agree. Good luck.

          1. SDC
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 5 months ago

            Same to you mate πŸ™‚

    4. Maine Man
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      I think what also helps the case of the cheaper forward line is that there's value to be found in some of the lower priced options, such as Jimenez, Jota, Wilson, King (?), Vardy (at the top end of the cheaper options). And Pukki at 6.5 may be one to watch if he can replicate his championship form

  2. Laporte of the Gods
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Annoyingly I agree with most of the above, but just can't find a balance I am happy with to allow Kane/Auba together with Salah and Sterling.

    1. Tigers Time
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Agree with this - I'm probably going to wildcard after GW4 so will wait till then to see if I need to lose either Salah or Sterling to accomodate a big hitting striker.

    2. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thanks for the comments. Yes price hikes have meant that it is very difficult to have 3 big hitters. But that's the fun, otherwise many would complain about the template teams!

      1. Laporte of the Gods
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Absolutely - great article showing the argument for. Anyone preparing one for the argument against? I think the key is really how you spread your money...

        Also absolutely agree - this is where the fun is - otherwise we'd all have the same teams!

        1. SDC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 5 months ago

          Cheers mate. The beauty of Fpl is that everyone has their own style which makes it so much more fun!

    3. danny2310
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      I'm currently on this team
      Pope (Button)
      Coleman Vvd Trent Kwp (Lundstram)
      Salah Sterling Perez Lamela/Trossard (Dendoncker)
      King Auba (Greenwood)

      I think it's hard to say that's not a decent team with good balance. Going for 2 or more 6 6.5m forwards I think is overkill while there are a lot of decent mid options at the same price point to jump around, which facilitate Auba/Kane as the 3rd big hitter.

      1. The Habib Beyes
        • 15 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        The big issue is the bench really. The 4.0 Defs and 4.5 Mids/Fwrs can work wonders for boosting extra funds, but it does mean that the bench could end up being an issue a few gameweeks down the line, especially when all three of them are.

        Considering the rotation that can go on, I feel 3 super cheap subs is a risk too much for me

      2. Laporte of the Gods
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        I have been trying to decide this. My other draft is
        Heaton (Button)
        Digne, VVD, TAA, Dunk (Lunds)
        Salah, Sterling, Perez, Barkley (donkers)
        Kane, King (Greenwood)

  3. FPL_Crisis
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Great post.
    9. Don’t be a sheep. Feels good to beat the crowd

    1. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Cheers mate!

  4. Cok3y5murf
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    "However, you do not need to keep them in your team for the entire season. This is not FPL Draft where you need to pick the player for the entire season, this is FPL. We get Transfers."

    Something that needs to be reminded to people here every day. There is a lot of obsessing over season tallies when all you have to look at is who's going to get the most points in the next 3-5 weeks and then transfer out if needed. There's also throwing around the term season-keeper when the only season-keeper last season was AWB.

    1. IRBOX ⚽
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      100% this. It’s all about timing and jumping on/off hauls slightly before others that will determine OR.

    2. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thank you for comments guys, glad you liked it πŸ™‚

  5. Link
    • 15 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Nice post. I'm sitting with Salah, Sterling and Auba and now only debating whether Sterling > KDB is worth it in order to better spread funds. Whether that's on an expensive defender or 3rd forward remains to be seen.

    1. moz_1983
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Same problem. Had KDB in since draft one but Sterling is looking too dangerous not to have.

      1. Link
        • 15 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        So much this

    2. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thanks for the comments and I am glad you liked it πŸ™‚

    3. jsd202
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      I've been on Auba for a while now - along with the usual Salah/Sterling double midfield. It seems crazy for balance to not have a premium forward, and one where I can switch to Aguero or Kane if needed without too much pain. I'm kind of hoping we are outliers doing this as it could reap dividends! The aim in fantasy football is to score more points than the other players and not the same....

      1. SDC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Exactly mate. Completely agree with you.

  6. niaz1982
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Hey would appreciate comments back:

    Pickford [Henderson]
    Digne, TAA, Holebas, Chillwell [Lundstram]
    Siggy, Salah, Sterling, Tielmans [Dendoncker]
    King, Jota [Greenwood]
    1.5 ITB

    Thanks

  7. kongolord
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Who do you think is a better punt for the first couple of gameweeks?

    A) Barkley: rotates with Mount, but might be on pens, free kicks and likes to score against Man Utd.

    B) Wood: good preseason, Burnley looking solid again now without Europe, but competition with J.Rod/Barnes.

    Would leave me with either 451 or 442, otherwise the team is pretty balanced, just cant decide between these two.

    1. CarlTN
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Wood.

  8. Rossi3254
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Great article and I completely agree that the premium forwards are an essential part of the game. For me Kane was one of the first players in my team and he has been ever present in all my drafts. Im quite happy seeing so many people go without though and then have to panic and throw their team structure out of the window when Kane or Auba hit form early on. I think the other key that makes them so valuable early on is that while everyone is talking about all the amazing budget options be it 6.5 forwards or 6.5-7.5 midfielders right now if you look back at previous years and how many names touted at the start of the season turn out to be quality fpl options it is actually very few so I am more than happy to limit the number of mid price options from the start in favour of proven heavy hitters.

    1. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thanks for the comment. What you mention is absolutely correct. The fact that there are so many options available between 6.5 - 7.5 makes it a lottery pick. Very difficult to choose the right one, especially to begin with.

    2. Miggy007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Its not a very brave tactic though and a faint heart never won a fair lady:). The last few seasons Kane has been awful in August. It would more likely be the case of people rushing to drop him. Throw in the serious ankle issue he seems incapable of getting over and I wouldnt touch him with a barge pole tbh. It is all about opinions I agree. But there are proven premier league options available for a lot less and for me they have to be the way to go. Jimenez and Wilson both offer lots of goals at a much lower cost. For me, they are less risky than Kane so its a no brainer.

      1. SDC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Sure mate. Each manager has his own style and that's what makes this game so fascinating πŸ™‚ All the best for the season πŸ™‚

  9. Arsenal97
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    1) Salah Sterling Vardy
    Or
    2) Salah KDB Aubamyang (0.5 ITB)

  10. FOMFF
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Woke up this morning convinced i needed to switch up my salah, Sterling, Kane team after reading the article about teams to watch. Now this has me second guessing.

    The thing I do like about my team is with 3 premiums, I feel less likely to need hits in early gw’s. But i do not trust these 6.5m forwards...

    1. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Haha.. Cheers mate πŸ™‚
      Yes, choosing the right 6.5 mil forward is very tricky indeed.

  11. oak_ac
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    With 17.5 Budget, which option is better?
    Thanks.

    A: Gomez5.5 + Fraser7.5 + Wickham4.5
    B: VVD6.5 + Dendoncker4.5 + Deeney6.5

    1. Arsenal97
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      B

  12. Salino
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Which option seems better? I have King so B will be doubling up on BOU. Have 2 liv and 1 city def. There is a risk in going without sterling, but the layout gets much more flexible. There are no other attackers i am considering atm. (wait and see with Kane).

    A) Auba - De Bruyne - Zouma (More flexible layout - could put in Eriksen to have Coleman).
    B) Wilson - Sterling - Coleman (Double BOU attack, no premium striker).

  13. DeadStarComing
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Nice article! I agree with pretty much everything you said.

    I do think the drift away from premium forwards is also something to do with modern football. Most prem teams now only play one forward and it’s some of the so called midfielders that seem to get greater opportunities to score these days. I do think FPL should address the issue too. FPL point scoring heavily favours midfielders over forwards.

    1. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Thanks for commenting and I am glad you liked it

      1. SDC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 5 months ago

        Yes modern day system of 1 forward and it makes an issue in certain teams like Liverpool. Whereas in other teams the forward also gets chances. But yes, Fpl should address this issue as you mentioned. Maybe bps can be adjusted.

  14. Shoplifters United
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    VVD or Robbo to pair with TAA?

  15. etown
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Good evening everyone, looking for any feedback on current team.

    Ryan

    VVD. Digne. Cathcart. Lundstram.

    Fraser. Sterling. Gross. Salah.

    Wilson. Aubameyang.

    McGovern, Greenwood, Dendoncker, Kelly.

    0 ITB.

    Thinking Gross to a 5.5 or even 5 and upgrade defense or bench.

    1. marco_atk85
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Gross is not expected to be in starting line up for BHA

  16. marco_atk85
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Definitly number 2 is the case for me. I cant believe I have seen so much draft with Wilson is the leading fw. What will they do once Agu/Auba/Kane will start to score? I am happy to have a team with a premium player in each position so I can be flexiably for emergency change.

    My team is following currently:

    Ryan, Button
    VVD, Zinch, Coleman, Rico, Lundstram
    Salah, Sterling, Ayoze, Barkley, Dendo
    Kane, Haller, Ings

    1. SDC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Yes, seeing so many RMTs without any premium forward. Having one helps in the team structure.

      Your team looks good, maybe bench is a bit weak. If you can squeeze 0.5 from somewhere and upgrade one 4 mil Def to 4.5 Def, then it might be more balanced

  17. RichRover
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Do I need to delete my team and start again?
    Ederson, Ryan.
    Van Dijk, Ake, Coleman, Dunk, Lundstram.
    Sterling, Salah, Perez, Norwood, Dendoncker.
    Kane, Wood, Calvert-Lewin.
    Not interested in a non-playing 4m gk.
    Any advice appreciated, thanks.

    1. jsd202
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      If you're going for someone with cost of Ederson they should be set and forget for the season as the clean sheet potential is huge and you should really be going for a 4m GK, which could allow you to upgrade Norwood maybe? I would also look elsewhere than Calvert-Lewin as Everton have not been scoring pre-season - maybe Che Adams from Southampton?

  18. GhaithNahhas
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 5 months ago

    Auba or Kane for GW1 ?

    1. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 5 months ago

      Here is the solution, just copy my team πŸ˜‰

      Heaton/McGovern

      TAA, VvD, Coleman, Zinch, Zouma
      Salah, Fraser, Perez (Hayden, Donks)
      Kane, Auba (Greenwood)

      Starting with 5-3-2 is my way to finance Kane and Auba. Yes, no Sterling is a risk. No risk, no gain. His first 3 fixtures aren't too good. The idea is that I have money in these heavy hitters and it gives me options and flexibility.