Members
21 February 2023 296 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

Our top team of Pro Pundits and Hall of Famers write about all things Fantasy Premier League (FPL) throughout the season.

Only Premium Members are able to read every single one of these pieces, so sign up today to get full access not just to the editorial content but all of the other benefits, from hundreds of Opta stats to a transfer planner.

In our poll asking site users how they are handling transfers in Gameweek 25, 14.54% of voters said they would be deploying the Free Hit chip.

With that in mind, five-time top 1k finisher Tom Freeman weighs up the pros and cons of a Gameweek 25 Free Hit in his latest article.

... 2

GAMEWEEK 25

FIXTURES SORTED BY DIFFICULTY (‘EASIEST’ FIRST)

GAMEWEEK 25 FREE HIT: THE PROS

  • As ever, whether Gameweek 25 is the ‘right’ moment to Free Hit will depend much on the make-up of your squad. I’m not planning to play it myself, but for those managers struggling to put out anything close to 11 players – and there will be a few given the ownership levels detailed below – there’s an obvious appeal to using it. So, a Free Hit could be a good option if, for example, you already own three Man Utd players, a couple from Newcastle, plus the likes of Kaoru Mitoma (£5.4m) and Ivan Toney (£7.7m).
TOP 100K OWNERSHIP
PlayerOwnership (%)
Marcus Rashford99.52
Kieran Trippier97.68
Luke Shaw84.83
Kaoru Mitoma29.92
Bruno Fernandes28.55
Miguel Almiron26.25
Ivan Toney22.71
Nick Pope19.67
Ben Mee15.35
Sven Botman14.18

  • Even more so if you have weak bench players like Hugo Bueno (£3.9m) and Nathan Patterson (£3.9m). That’s because there are no guarantees that either player will get two starts in Gameweek 25, with the latter perhaps struggling to get any minutes at all. Add in Aleksandar Mitrovic’s (£6.9m) nagging hamstring injury, and the problems will be mounting up for some. So, using the chip now will allow you to field a full complement of players with up to 22 fixtures, without needing to take a hit.

READ MORE: Gameweek 25 game-time of Patterson and Bueno uncertain

  • By activating the chip now, you can ensure you have the right ‘doublers’ in place without needing to take hits. What I mean by this is that the success of a Gameweek 25 Free Hit will likely rest on Liverpool. If less-owned players like Mohamed Salah (£12.6m), Trent Alexander-Arnold (£7.3m) and Darwin Nunez (£8.7m) – fitness permitting – get multiple returns, you could see a big rank rise (see ownership levels below). Managers who invested in the Man City triple-up of Erling Haaland (£12.2m), Kevin De Bruyne (£12.4m) and Riyad Mahrez (£7.8m) in Double Gameweek 23 will know what I mean, as the trio combined for 39 points. These fixtures for Liverpool are really good, too:
CRYSTAL PALACE
Minutes per expected goal (xG)Minutes per expected goal conceded (xGC)
2022/2399.5 (19th)65.4 (13th)
Gameweek 17-24109.8 (20th)58 (16th)
WOLVES
Minutes per expected goal (xG)Minutes per expected goal conceded (xGC)
2022/2393.6 (17th)66.7 (11th)
Gameweek 17-2492.6 (17th)56.6 (17th)
TOP 100K OWNERSHIP (VIA LIVEFPL): LIVERPOOL PLAYERS
  • While Liverpool players look great for Gameweek 25, some managers might not want them beyond that. An Anfield clash with in-form Man Utd follows and there is a potential blank in Gameweek 28, too. So, if that’s you, using the Free Hit this week could work. By doing so, you can also hold players like Marcus Rashford (£7.3m), Luke Shaw (£5.4m), Bruno Fernandes (£9.8m) and Kieran Trippier (£6.1m), who have been great assets to own since the restart. Brighton and Brentford also blank in Gameweek 25 but have decent fixtures to follow, including a Double Gameweek 27. If you already own Mitoma, Pervis Estupinan (£4.7m) and Toney, the case for the Free Hit is potentially building.
  • A Gameweek 25 Free Hit allows you to react to Liverpool and Man City’s midweek UEFA Champions League line-ups, which could potentially provide clues as to the best players to own for this upcoming round. This enables you to target the assets you think will start, which could be very useful in Man City’s case.
  • This one could, of course, backfire, but it means you can jump on players you wouldn’t ordinarily consider. For example, Lukasz Fabianski (£5.0m) meets a Nottingham Forest side who have scored just three away goals all season but is only owned by 1.2% of FPL managers.

GAMEWEEK 25 FREE HIT: THE CONS

 

 1



The rest of this article below is completely free to read but requires a Fantasy Football Scout user account for access – you can get yours at no cost here

 1



296 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Gazzpfc
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    1. Salah Gomez Nketiah -4
    2. Gakpo Trent Darwin -8

    ??

    1. mojoindojo
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      1

    2. antis0cial
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'd probably edge with 1

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      1 but I'd pick someone else over Gomez. Konate will be back soon enough and Gomez will be dropped.

    4. Wild Card this!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      1

    5. SKENG
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      1 with an Everton defender instead of Gomez.

    6. Tcheco
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      1 with Tarkowski instead of Gomez

      1. Gazzpfc
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I’ve already got Tarks so it’s Gomez Kilman or Bueno

  2. DV8R
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Kane to Darwin worth a -4 or nah? KDB to Salah is the other move.

    1. antis0cial
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I don't think so unless you want Darwin over Kane in future weeks

    2. Karan_G14
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not for me.

    3. SKENG
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No

    4. Tcheco
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No

    5. alexmj
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Yes

  3. Karan_G14
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Kepa
    White Tarkowski Patterson*
    KDB Bruno* Saka Andreas
    Haaland Nketiah Gnonto

    (Ward Shaw* Rashy* Trippier*)
    1FT & 3.2m

    A) Bruno ➡️ Salah 

    B) KDB, Bruno & White ➡️ Salah, Odegaard & TAA -8
    C) Bruno, KDB & Shaw/Patterson ➡️ Salah, Gakpo & TAA -8

    Thoughts please?

    1. antis0cial
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Maybe just A but C would be tempting if you wanted to go for it

      1. Karan_G14
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Im tempted to go for C. KDB not being doing much recently and Patterson also not starting can get two doublers for them. Anyways I feel I will have to sell Kdb sooner or later for Mitoma and Toney for their doubles.

  4. antis0cial
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Shaw + Bruno to TAA + Gakpo
    B) Bruno + Kane to Salah + Darwin
    C) Bruno + Kane + Shaw to Salah + Darwin + Tark (-4)

    Kepa
    Ake White Bueno
    Saka Mahrez Andreas
    Haaland Kane Nketiah

    Ward Shaw Bruno Rashford Trippier

    1. Firmino
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'm doing A but I already have Salah

    2. Karan_G14
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

  5. TeddiPonza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Best combo next week:

    A TAA Mahrez Salah Darwin (-4 hit) captain Salah
    B Gomez Gakpo Salah Kane. (-4 hit) captain Salah
    C Gomez Mahrez Salah Kane (no hit) captain Salah
    D Gakpo Mahrez Darwin Kane (no hit) captain Saka
    E TAA Salah McNeil Kane (-4 hit)

    Gomez can be Myko in above scenarios

    Thanks!

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Don't like Gomez so A or D.

      1. TeddiPonza
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        If you put Myko or Kilman instead, would that change your opinion?

    2. ZimZalabim
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

  6. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Looking at two options this week with my 2 FTs.

    A) Kane + Fernandes + Burn > Salah + Darwin + Tarkowski -4
    B) Fernandes + Burn > Gakpo + TAA

    Which line looks better?

    Team is:

    Kepa Ward
    White Bueno (Shaw Trippier Burn)
    Mahrez Saka (Almiron Fernandes Rashford)
    Haaland Nketiah (Kane)

    1. Karan_G14
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Tough one. B is probably sensible

    2. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I am pretty much looking at similar 2 options. B seems more "logical" to me.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        It does seem more logical.

        I just fear Salah a bit and I like Darwin more than Gakpo as well.

        1. ZimZalabim
          • 9 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          do A then
          you need to have some fun in this game and getting the players you want rather than the logical option is fine from time to time.

          Also when we say Logical option here we mean safer choice, so risk averse but in this case the risk is very clearly worth it imo so maybe its actually more logical to take the risk here making A the logical option, if that makes sense

    3. TeddiPonza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B as you can keep Kane. Captain Saka then?

    4. Ask Yourself
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Why is Kane in a bracket he plays this week doesn’t he?
      I think B

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Ah yeah he shouldn't be in brackets.

    5. Shultan
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    6. La Roja
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

    7. Black Knights
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I did B because i don't want to sell Kane for Mo. Mo the more certain minutes though, if that sways you and A could be explosive.

    8. Catastrophe
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B for me. Doesn't make sense to lose Kane given he has a game. I'm likely doing B, although unfortunately I have to lose Trippier.

  7. Oasthouse FC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Bottomed....Tying myself into all sort of knots, what is best to do chaps? any advice much appreciated

    Current team

    Kepa (ward)
    Tripper, shaw, Gabriel (patterson, bueno)
    KDB, Odegard, Mitoma, Rashford, Andreas
    Nketiah, Kane, Haaland

    2.9 ITB, and 2 FT.

    1 - KDB and Shaw to Salah and TAA (gives me 9 players, 10 if Bueno plays)
    2 - KDB and Shaw to Salah and TAA, and Patterson to Tarkowski (gives me 10 players) for a minus 4
    3 - KDB to saka, Gabriel to TAA, Patterson to Tark - (gives me 9 players, 10 if bueno plays) for a minus 4

    1. Shultan
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      2

    2. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      2 seems like a good option

  8. pirieca
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Current Team:

    Kepa
    White Tarkowski Williams
    Andreas Saka Martinelli Fernandes
    Mitrovic Kane Haaland

    Ward Trippier Rashford Shaw

    Which would you do:

    1. Fernandes & Williams out for Gakpo and TAA (-4)
    2. Fernandes and Shaw out for Salah and Joe Gomez (-4)

    1. Shultan
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not fan of gomez so think 1 is better combo

  9. Ask Yourself
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    So I can get 10 out currently and have 2FTs to work with. Here are my options what one do u like most x

    A) Bruno + Shaw/Perisic > Salah + Tark
    B) Bruno + Shaw/Perisic > Gakpo + TAA
    C) Shaw > TAA and bank FT to help plan for Brighton/Brentford double
    D) Shaw/Perisic + Bruno + Gnonto > TAA + McNeil + Darwin -4

    Ederson Ward*
    Bueno White Perisic Trippier* Shaw*
    Saka Odegaard Andreas Bruno* Rash*
    Haaland Kane Gnonto

    Had planned on a WC27 previously but now thinking of holding WC a little longer so C is where I’m currently leaning as I think I’d captain Saka regardless this GW. What u reckon ?

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      C is what I'm likely to go for. Wouldn't want Gakpo/McNeil in my team for 26 & skeptical about them even as one week punts

    2. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I like A

  10. Jones Kusi
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Best option?
    A. KDB, Bueno > Salah, Matip
    B. Mitrovic, KDB, Shaw > Darwin, Gakpo, TAA (-4)
    C. KDB, James, Shaw > Salah, Robertson, Gomez (-4)
    D. KDB, James, Mitrovic > Salah, Gomez/Tarkowski, Darwin (-4)

    1. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      hmmm probably D, Tark over Gomez

  11. KUNingas
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Gakpo + TAA
    B) Salah + Tarkowski

    1. Tcheco
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B if Salah is captain

      A if Saka is captain

    2. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

    3. Gudjohnsen
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

  12. Nate(U)dog(ie)
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    https://mobile.twitter.com/City_Xtra/status/1627995404343050240

    Stones, Walker and KDB absent from training

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Rico owners emerge from the mud

      1. Botman and Robben
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Rico was too good to be true lol

      2. The Mentaculus
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Or Akanji rather? If using back 3 still

  13. Joyce1998
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Any suggestions what to do here ?

    2FT
    0.2 itb

    A- KDB > Salah
    B- Martin, KDB, Akanji, Saka, Gakpo, Taa -4
    C- Any other suggestions cheers

    Sanchez, Steele
    Tripp, Shaw, Saliba, Akanji, Bueno
    Rash, Martin, Odegaard, KDB, Andreas
    Toney, Kane, Haaland

  14. EL tridente
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Ederson,
    Gabriel, Bueno, Patterson
    KDB, Martinelli, Ødegaard, Andreas
    Haaland, Kane, Mitro

    Ward, Shaw, Trippier, Rashford

    2ft and 0.3 Itb. Best transfers to make?

    KDB and Shaw to Salah and Tarkowski maybe?

  15. Karan_G14
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Is Gakpo a legit option or more of a punt?
    Haven't been watching much Liverpool lately.

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Been really poor from what I've seen & seems very unlikely that he'd be in the first 11 when everyone is fit

    2. Firmino
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Difficult start but really improving the last two games. Looks like a longterm Firmino replacement. His place to lose but will be subbed in every game.

    3. Herger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Gakpo Fifa stats:

      Passing 77
      Dribbling 84
      Overall 83

      Sancho Fifa stats:

      Passing 82
      Dribbling 91
      Overall 87

      If Sancho’s not an option then neither is Gakpo

      1. Ask Yourself
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Lol

    4. Black Knights
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I have punted on him because I couldn't rip up my team to get Mo in, and I consider him getting 100-120 minutes better than the SGW options.

    5. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Definitely a punt at this stage, think people are convincing themselves otherwise though. Salah all day is the pick

  16. kennethrhcp
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A. kdb and Greenwood
    B. Gakpo and Darwin (-8)

    1. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Out of those 2 probably B! but -8 may be painful, -4 justifiable

      1. kennethrhcp
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks for the reply!

        Ya I'm not 1 to usually take hits

  17. Gazzpfc
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    1. Kane kdb Shaw
    To Darwin Salah Trent -8
    2 kdb and Shaw
    To Salah and Gomez -4

    ???

    1. KUNingas
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      So Kane, Gomez or Darwin, TAA (-4). Latter one for me

      1. Gazzpfc
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Kane Salah Gomez
        Darwin Salah Trent

  18. Magic Zico
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Salah [C] and three ARS already White, Odegaard and Nketiah. Any merit of bringing in Saka (-4) or stick with KDB instead?

    1. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'd probably bring in Saka (c) for a hit, then you can keep him for the season! KDB not delivering the best returns for the price, i'm getting rid of him this week for Salah

  19. Captain Slabhead
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Worth a punt on Jota for the double? Lost patience with Mitro and have no Liverpool cover

    1. Jengkreng
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not yet...i think he will not start both games....maybe one

  20. Forza Papac
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    My only route to Salah is to sell Kane. With that in mind...

    A) Shaw, Bruno > TAA, Odegaard (-4)

    B) Shaw, Bruno, Kane > Zinchenko, Salah, Darwin (-8)

    Already have Saka, Nketiah and Robbo

    1. Chris_l25
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Could you not go for Gakpo instead? ( i prefer Salah but i mean if you're struggling to get the funds)

      1. Forza Papac
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        That would mean going without both of odegaard and Salah which I don't want to do. Only have one midfield spot available

  21. Chris_l25
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    taking a -4 to give me 11 starters and 7 doublers

    Ramsdale
    Tarkowski, VVD, Castagne, Bueno
    Odegaard, Salah, Martinelli, Andreas
    Haaland, Kane

    GTG?

  22. The Tinkerman
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Best way to free up funds in my team:

    A) KDB > Gakpo
    B) Kane > Darwin

    I need to sell Patterson, Lewis and Shaw and need that cash from one of these two to fund the moves. Which means -8... it either that or

    C) Free Hit now and play about 5 guys in GW28

    1. The Tinkerman
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I can technically take a -4 to get in 4 cheap defenders for the 3 listed, but I will have zero liverpool players.

      1. The Tinkerman
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        *3 cheaper defenders

        e.g. Tark, Perruad, James

  23. Flynny
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Hi...is this worth - 8? Would set me up nicely for gw28 too....

    Kdb kane shaw patterson to salah trent Watkins and tarkowski

    Thanks

    Kepa
    White patterson (trippier botman shawp)
    Kdb saka martinelli andreas (rashford)
    Haaland kane gnonto

  24. GordonMcDowall
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Thoughts on playing Free Hit on GW25?

    1. La Roja
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Thoughts posting your team then asking this?

      1. GordonMcDowall
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Pope
        Mee,Wan Bissaka, Bueno, Trippier, Schar
        Rashford Saka, Mitoma, KDB, Odegaard
        Haaland Nketiah Kane

        1. La Roja
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          No

        2. Botman and Robben
          • 9 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Don't have thoughts on this, no.

    2. MYNAMEISBigtopmark.sman
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No

  25. src2oo4
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Choose 1 of 4?
    A)Cucu+Patterson+Kane>Trent+Tarkowski>Darwin
    B)Cucu+Patterson>Gomez+Tarkowski. (Can add Gakpo or Darwin)
    C)Trippier+Mahrez+Kane>Tarkowski+Salah+Darwin
    D)Cucu+Mahrez+Kane>Tarkowski+Salah+Watkins

  26. The Tinkerman
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Kane, Shaw, Patterson, Lewis > Darwin, TAA, James, Tark (-8)
    B) Shaw, Patterson, Lewis > James, Tark,

    1. The Tinkerman
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      ... about 80% of my post was erased when I posted. This forum 😀

  27. Letsgo!
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Mcneil a punt?

  28. Catastrophe
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    2 FT, 0 ITB.

    A) Fernandes & Trippier -> Gakpo & TAA
    B) Fernandes & Toney -> Gakpo & Darwin
    C) Fernandes, Toney & Shaw/Ake -> Gakpo, Darwin & Gomez/Tarkowski (-4)
    D) Fernandes, Trippier & Shaw/Ake -> Gakpo, TAA & Gomez/Tarkowski (-4)

    Ederson
    Ake, Gabriel, Bueno
    Saka, Martinelli, Andreas
    Haaland, Kane

    (Ward, Shaw, Trippier, Fernandes, Rashford, Toney)

    Cheers.

  29. klopp it guys
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Is this worth a -4

    Kdb, b Fernandes and greenwood, for Salah March and nunez?

  30. Magic Zico
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Gakpo Felix or KDB Gnonto?