[sbu_large_image] Technical Area
24 September 2012 2298 comments
Paul Paul
Share:

Having splashed the cash on Eden Hazard and Oscar over the summer, Chelsea’s attacking midfield options looked mouth-watering going into the new season. The prospect of the pair lining up with Juan Mata behind Fernando Torres suggested a change in the Blues’ playing style but until last weekend the trio of number 10 types had failed to feature together from the start in any competition.

While Hazard has made an instant impact this season, Mata and Oscar have been used tentatively by Roberto Di Matteo after a summer of Olympic activity with Spain and Brazil respectively. As they both start to approach full match-fitness, Di Matteo unleashed the pair alongside Hazard for the visit of Stoke on Saturday. A late Ashley Cole finally broke the stubborn Stoke resistance as the Blues earned a narrow 1-0 win and, post-match, the Chelsea manager admitted the trio will require plenty more game time together in order to build up an understanding:

“It’s the first time we have tried it, it certainly needs more work and practice, to tactically integrate them into our system. I thought today it worked very well, but it will take time for them to know each other better. I want them to have mobility and rotation, they are very intelligent at finding free space, we lacked a bit of width at times so we needed our full backs to provide us with that.”

The average position map from the Stoke game (below left) sums up Di Matteo’s words perfectly. Mata (10), Oscar (11), Hazard (17) and Fernando Torres (9, obscured) were all in virtually identical positions when in possession. Interchanging positions, dropping deep and foraging forward, the three attacking midfielders ensured Chelsea had plenty of possession in the final third of the pitch; the hosts had 281 touches in this crucial area compared to 204 in the previous home match against Newcastle (below right).

Indeed, looking at the Magpies showdown, the player positions were a lot more defined. Mata’s (10) tendency to drift inside when on the ball is in direct opposition to his replacement Ramires (7) in that Gameweek 2 match. With Ryan Bertrand (34) offering natural width on the left, the 4-2-3-1 formation is far more apparent. Di Matteo’s remark on the full-backs is also reflected in both maps – Branislav Ivanovic (2) and Ashley Cole (3) were far more prominent in attack in the Stoke game (left), foraging forward and offering balance on the flanks.

Mins/Tch Touches Final 3rd Passes Rcvd Final 3rd Dribbles Pen Area Tchs Chance Crtd Goal Attmpts
Mata 1 55 32 2 5 5 3
Oscar 1.1 50 27 3 3 2 5
Hazard 1.1 45 30 1 2 2 1

Looking at the stats of the attacking midfield three from Saturday, what’s immediately apparent is that they are almost identical for minutes per touch, with Mata judging edging in with one every minute. Despite his substitute withdrawal just after the hour mark, Hazard’s stats still stand up well in comparison to the other two here – indeed, he received only two less passes in the final third than Mata, despite playing almost half an hour less than the Spaniard. There’s no doubt his display was less than sparkling; he made the fewest dribbles and had the least number of goal attempts against Stoke but Hazard’s creativity saw him provide two goalscoring opportunities for team mates; the same number as Oscar, who managed the full game.

Hazard Gameweek 1-4 v Gameweek 5
Hazard’s Fantasy owners may be a little concerned after his home blank last weekend. The Belgian was our Captain Poll favourite for Gameweek 5 but lasted just 62 minutes before making way for Victor Moses as Di Matteo chose to rest the Belgian after the midweek Champions League match with Juventus. A look at his average positions in the first five Gameweeks (below left), however, show that he was actually further forward when on the ball last weekend than in any match so far. It’s also reflected in the stats – although Hazard averaged 87.8 minutes over his first four matches, he was more involved in Chelsea’s play against the Potters.

Mins Touches Final 3rd Mins/ Touch Mins/ Pass Rcvd Passes Rcvd Final 3rd Dribbles Pen Area Tchs Min/Chance Crtd Goal Attempts
Hazard GW 5 62 45 1.1 1.7 30 1 3 31.1 1
Hazard GW1-4 87.8 36 1.3 1.8 21.2 4.5 5.8 35.1 3

He managed 45 touches in the final third on Saturday, bettering his Gameweek 1-4 average of 36, while the Belgian was also on the ball more often – 1.1 minutes per touch to 1.3. Hazard also received 30 passes in the final third against Stoke, well up on his previous average of 21.2. The issue here, though, is that while his overall team involvement improved, his individual stats regressed. A single successful dribble was way down on the 4.5 per game, just three touches in the box versus 5.8, and one shot at goal compared to the average of three – Hazard needs to perhaps rediscover his selfish streak a little more rather than get caught up in intricate passing patterns.

Mata Gameweek 1-4 v Gameweek 5
As the average position map shows (above right), Mata was further forward on Saturday than in any of his previous Gameweeks. His stats are alarmingly better and suggests the Spaniard could well be set for a resurgence in such a system. In his previous matches, Mata played a more withdrawn role, allowing Hazard to wreak havoc but last weekend his role took a significant turn for the better.

Mins Touches Final 3rd Mins/ Touch Mins/ Pass Rcvd Passes Rcvd Final 3rd Dribbles Pen Area Tchs Min/Chance Crtd Goal Attempts
Mata GW 5 89 55 1 1.5 32 2 5 17.8 3
Mata GW1-4 78.3 23 1.1 1.3 17 1 3 58.8 1.3

In the attacking final third, Mata had 55 touches and received 32 passes against Stoke – his averages across the first four Gameweeks were 23 and 17 respectively. He made double the number of dribbles, found his way into the box more (five touches to three). In terms of creativity, he provided a goalscoring opportunity every 17.8 minutes against the Potters, compared to his previous average of 58.8 minutes and Mata also fired three shots at goal in the Gameweek 5 win – again, a real improvement on his 1.3 average.

It’s an intriguing turn of events that may well bring Mata back onto the Fantasy radar. Both he and Hazard began the Fantasy Premier League season priced at 9.5 but while the Belgian has soared to 10.3, Mata has dropped down to 8.9. The signs are certainly promising – indeed, Mata supplied the assist for Cole’s winner – if Di Matteo gives the trio regular outings together.

Full Backs Gameweek 1-4 v Gameweek 5

Finally, a quick look at the full-back stats. As the average position maps highlight, both Ivanovic (left) and Cole (right) were further forward against Stoke than they managed in any other Gameweek.

The comparison for both players in Gameweek 5 against their Gameweek 1-4 averages clearly indicates how the pair’s potential for attacking points could be further increased. Although both players actually saw less of the ball overall, Ivanovic made 29 touches on the Stoke final third, up on his previous average of 18.2. He also received more passes in this area, by 21 to 12.2, while the right-back produced more crosses and saw more of the ball in the box. The same applies to Cole in all the above categories. More touches (23 to 15) and passes received in the final third (15 to nine), more crosses and touches in the box, with the left-back slotting home the late winner.

Mins/Touch Touches Final 3rd Passes Rcvd Final 3rd Pen Area Tchs Crosses
Ivanovic GW 5 1.5 29 21 6 4
Ivanovic GW1-4 1.2 18.2 12.2 2.8 3.8
Cole GW 5 1.5 23 15 3 2
Cole GW1-4 1.3 15 9 1 1.2

It may well be that Di Matteo uses such a system in more straightforward home games as it clearly asks more from the pair from an attacking perspective – such a formation away from home could leave the Blues exposed on the flanks if the pair bomb forward as they did against Stoke. Their contribution will be key to the system, though, and if the Blue can continue the defensive resolve that has already accrued four clean sheets in the first five, Ivanovic and Cole – already first and second in the FPL defender rankings – could well maintain their strong showings as Chelsea continue to evolve.

*The Technical Area is put together using the statistics and maps available in our members area. For access to such data and tools on every player, team and match of the 2012/13 season, and for exclusive members articles like this, click here for details.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

2,298 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Desertbug
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    So, Fulham fans....
    Is Baird there to stay as an OOP defender playing MF? Or is he just keeping somebody's place warm?

    Open Controls
    1. Scroobius Mac
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Yeah Diarra's....for a year.

      Open Controls
  2. MJ6987
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Following on from discussion above re rotation by the Champions League teams of their stars (particularly for the easier games when you actually want them to play) I wonder if there would be any mileage in avoiding players from these teams altogether, except for maybe the very safe ones like Yaya, Kompany, and some other defender etc?

    Eg could afford (just tried it)

    Hart Jaask
    Baines Cole Verm Kompany Demel
    Fellani Pienaar Barfa Michu Yaya
    Fletcher Ba Lambert

    Food for thought wild carders?

    Open Controls
    1. THE Wild Rover
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Nice bench... 😉

      Open Controls
    2. Parm
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I wouldn't feel comfortable without a "Reliable" captain each week.

      Open Controls
      1. MJ6987
        • 15 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        But....are the likes of RVP really that reliable? See 2 weeks ago when most people did captain him... 1 point cameo. And one of the ones above would inevitably have a nice fixture each week. And very little chance of a benching scenario.

        Open Controls
        1. King Eric, in America
          • 15 Years
          13 years, 10 months ago

          You could rotate the (c) amongst those three and get 1 point every week.

          Open Controls
          1. Parm
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            13 years, 10 months ago

            ^This^

            Increased card risk, Points loss for Goals conceded.

            Open Controls
        2. floydy_floyd
          • 15 Years
          13 years, 10 months ago

          Yaya to puncheon ba to aguero

          Open Controls
    3. Kostja
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      In 2 weeks you will want a new wildcard with this one.

      Open Controls
    4. Scroobius Mac
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      One or more of Tevez/Aguero/RVP/Rooney/Hazard/Bale/Cazorla will pretty much always be in form and make you pay when everyone around you has them captained.

      Open Controls
      1. MJ6987
        • 15 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        Yeah there is that, this is very much an experimental team. I would try it if I had one of those naughty second teams that had a wild card in tact.

        Open Controls
    5. McGurn
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I like the idea as i am very concerned about the RVP/Tevez rotation when captained but i don't think i would risk it

      Open Controls
    6. The Mighty I
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Interesting point just looking at United's fixtures coming off champions league games new, che, avl, QPR, mci - 4/5 of those games away. Including Chelsea and City.

      Open Controls
  3. QWOP
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    A) Baines and Clark

    or

    B) A. Cole and Ridgewell?

    Open Controls
  4. floydy_floyd
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Fellaini likely to play tomo night?

    Open Controls
  5. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    hmm, this lurking malarkey is quite interesting

    Open Controls
    1. King Eric, in America
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I'm not sure it's technically 'lurking' if you post while doing it.

      Open Controls
      1. THE Wild Rover
        • 16 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        🙂

        Open Controls
      2. JK - Cønt ⭐
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        I was lurking ofr half an hour or so without posting. Just thought I'd say I was still here

        Open Controls
        1. King Eric, in America
          • 15 Years
          13 years, 10 months ago

          I wasn't trying to be critical of you ... just saying. 🙂

          Open Controls
      3. Stern John Terry Wilson Pal…
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        😆

        Open Controls
    2. Brian (Not the Messiah)
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I do like a good lurk every so often... mostly when I only have 10 mins to spare

      Open Controls
  6. Manani
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    it is a shame how little people read the article, and even less people discuss about it.

    Open Controls
    1. King Eric, in America
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      It's tough to keep a discussion going about an article during 22 pages, 2,000 posts. The first few pages tend to be more article-based. Then it becomes a free-for-all.

      Open Controls
      1. Pratik
        • 17 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        +1... I admit I don't start off reading the article, but I usually manage reading it while waiting for a few replies.

        Open Controls
    2. JT's Dog
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Go to page 1

      Open Controls
  7. What Else
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Hazard out, Santi in ? Yes or No?

    Open Controls
    1. Parm
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      After GW8.

      Open Controls
      1. Pratik
        • 17 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        +1, that would be sensible, but it's risky and fun now.

        Open Controls
  8. gerrard08
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    gerrard/sterling vs pienaar/barfa vs mata/maloney

    Open Controls
    1. Goonther
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      pienar/bfa easy

      Open Controls
      1. gerrard08
        • 13 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        after gw8

        Open Controls
    2. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      pienaar and barfa imo

      Open Controls
  9. Brian (Not the Messiah)
    • 16 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    hmm, how about Morrison->Fellaini and Vermaelen->Jags? Everton are on fire and fixtures the best for the next 8 fixtures!? WR mentioned that Fellaini might not keep playing so far forward, thoughts on Pienaar vs Fellaini?

    Open Controls
  10. Scroobius Mac
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    It's a stupidly minor point but according to the price rise/fall tool Karagounis started at 4.8.

    That can't be right can it?

    Open Controls
    1. Brian (Not the Messiah)
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      which tool is that? you do realise it loses its historic price changes?

      Open Controls
      1. Scroobius Mac
        • 15 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        On the main site. On transfers - sort by price (or fall) and it's at 0. And if you click i it looks as though he came into the game at 4.8

        Open Controls
        1. THE Wild Rover
          • 16 Years
          13 years, 10 months ago

          He did.

          Open Controls
          1. Scroobius Mac
            • 15 Years
            13 years, 10 months ago

            That's weird isn't it? I thought everybody started at a round million or .5 figure.

            Open Controls
            1. THE Wild Rover
              • 16 Years
              13 years, 10 months ago

              Yep, it was pointed out at the time that it had never been done before

              Open Controls
              1. Scroobius Mac
                • 15 Years
                13 years, 10 months ago

                I missed that meeting.
                How bizarre.

                Open Controls
                1. Pratik
                  • 17 Years
                  13 years, 10 months ago

                  Same here, didn't know about this till now.

                  Open Controls
    2. Corrigan
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I noticed it that the other day and thought either I'm hallucinating, it's numberwang or that is a Shane Fergie cock up.

      Open Controls
  11. duncansarmy
    • 16 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Alright nightshift. Any suggestions for transfers...need to get shut of dyer and fed. Got £1m.

    Foster
    
Cole ● lescott ● Hughes ● demel
    Pienaar ● cazorla ● valencia
    
RVP ● tevez ● Ba

    Subs: guthrie/clyne/ dyer k*/fedrici

    Help appreciated as always.

    Open Controls
  12. DementedDaddyDex
    • 17 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Lost on previous page...

    Got 2 FT, what do people think?

    1. Barnett > Nelsen &
    2. Guthrie > Sterling/Puncheon

    3. Just one of 1/2 and save transfer?

    Open Controls
  13. Goonther
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Tevez > Ba

    Graham > Berba

    Good?

    Open Controls
    1. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      yes who is ur other striker???

      Open Controls
      1. Goonther
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        RVP

        Open Controls
  14. gdog2244
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    team linked.... just did Ade>RVP

    How do i look???

    how could i get baines in without losing bale???

    Open Controls
    1. Parm
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I WANT MY TEAM NAME BACK!

      Open Controls
      1. gdog2244
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        you have that name too??? it's so good

        Open Controls
    2. Pratik
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      You should have done Ade->Berbatov/Ba, and some defender->Baines instead.

      Open Controls
      1. gdog2244
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        i have berba

        Open Controls
        1. Pratik
          • 17 Years
          13 years, 10 months ago

          People are getting rid of RVP and you just got him in, that's weird.

          Open Controls
          1. gdog2244
            • 14 Years
            13 years, 10 months ago

            who fool

            Open Controls
  15. Parm
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Right, shall I do Noble to HBA NOW to catch HBA's "Possible" price rise or wait till after his Capital One Cup game on Wednesday?

    Will he start on Wednesday?

    Open Controls
    1. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      wait the rise isnt rlly worth it

      Open Controls
      1. Parm
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        Will he play though?

        Open Controls
    2. floydy_floyd
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      He won't play. Iv same dilemma with Fellaini.

      Open Controls
    3. Pratik
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Unlikely to play, but I can't be certain.

      Open Controls
    4. HVT
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Do it now , not sure he will play mw ,
      I lost.1 on baines last night humming and hawing and tbh some advice on here said he wouldnt rise till mon night /tues night.
      I should have taken control of the situation.

      Open Controls
      1. Black Knights
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        I was happy to lose the 0.1 on Baines last night. Everton always play a strong team and i dont want to risk it with dirty Leeds.

        Open Controls
  16. QWOP
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Sorry for repost, need an answer! Am a bit undecided!

    A) Baines and Clark

    or

    B) A. Cole and Ridgewell?

    Open Controls
    1. Soapy
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      A

      Open Controls
    2. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      a

      Open Controls
  17. Philman
    • 16 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    I have just WC'ed the following team. Comments appreciated:

    Foster, Bego
    Baines, Gibbs, Rafa, Demel, Nelsen
    Santi, Ben Arfa, Fellaini, Pienaar, Michu
    RVP, Berbs, Fletcher

    Was thinking maybe RVP/Fletcher to Kun/Suarez instead (I honestly think Suarez will come good).

    Open Controls
    1. JT's Dog
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Gonna be faced with some bench dilemmas

      Open Controls
      1. Philman
        • 16 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        It seems a strong bench is more important than ever with such big squads these days.

        Open Controls
        1. JT's Dog
          13 years, 10 months ago

          Agree, but you may leave a few points on it some weeks. But still think good idea, would do RVP fletch option

          Open Controls
  18. Paolo Di Laernu - low rep r…
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    WC Midfield alternatives I'm thinking of:

    1.
    Pienaar HBA Cazorla Hazard (Puncheon)

    2.
    Pienaar Fellaini HBA Cazorla Nolan

    3.
    Pienaar HBA Cazorla Kagawa (Sterling)

    4.
    Fellaini HBA Hazard/Cazorla Nolan (Sterling)

    Any mids you think I should pay more attention to? What is your favourite out of these?

    Open Controls
    1. Paolo Di Laernu - low rep r…
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Oh another one

      5.
      Cazorla Hazard Kagawa Pienaar Nolan/Sterling

      Open Controls
    2. Philman
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I guess I have to say 2, based on my WC above. Still think Michu will stay great value.

      Open Controls
    3. John Colby (C)
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      For me its got to be Bale. Look at the damage he did to QPr when he shifted into midfield in the second half yesterday. Its a subjective opinion though.

      Open Controls
  19. gerrard08
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    pienaar or nolan

    Open Controls
    1. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      pi pi

      Open Controls
  20. John Colby (C)
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    QPR fans - is Ryan Nelson a guaranteed starter for the majority of the season? With 5 of your next 7 fixtures looking winnable I think he's a potential steal at 3.9m.

    Open Controls
    1. Philman
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Agree. I think he is 1st choice.

      Open Controls
    2. Pratik
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I have heard that he isn't. Something to do with M'Bia

      Open Controls
  21. SuperGrover
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Only problem with this analysis is that it focuses on counting numbers rather than percentage of the team's total involvement. Sure, Hazard had a bunch of touches in the final third, but that's because Chelsea as a whole had a ton of touches there. In fact, his percentage of the team's touches in the final third dropped noticeably.

    In GW 1-4, Chelsea averaged 180 final third touches and 87 final third passes. Against Stoke, they went for 281 and 148, respectively. That represented an increase of 56% and 70%, respectively.

    As for Hazard, while his raw totals went up, his ratio of touches to the teams went down considerably.

    GW 1-4
    % of team's Final 3rd touches: 144/721 = 20%
    % of team's Final 3rd Passes: 85/349 = 24.4%

    GW 5
    % of team's Final 3rd touches: 45/281 = 16%
    % of team's Final 3rd Passes: 31/148 = 20.9%

    Those ratios show conclusively that Hazard was not near the focus of the attack against Stoke.

    Open Controls
    1. John Colby (C)
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      All the more reason for him to be the focus after Saturday's inept performance. Surely this hasnt been lost on RDM?

      Open Controls
      1. SuperGrover
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        Problem is that Hazard and Oscar play the same positions essentially. While he'd love to focus, he's not going to be able to excel when Oscar is standing on his feet. It's tough enough with Mata in there.

        Chelsea will need to figure out how to widen their attack when they have those three in there. If they cannot, both Hazard and Oscar are going to struggle a bit. Not that they won't be valuable, just that you shouldn't expect Hazard's GW 1-4 numbers to continue moving forward.

        Open Controls
    2. King Eric, in America
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Me likey this analysis.

      Open Controls
  22.  ⓖⓐⓩⓩⓐ™
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Rate my team please

    Foster. (Jaaskelainen)

    Rafael. Demel. Baines (Hangeland) (Jenkinson)

    Hazard. Y Toure. Michu. Pienaar. (Sterling)

    Van persie Tevez Berbatov

    Open Controls
    1. JT's Dog
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Standard

      Open Controls
    2. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      good

      Open Controls
    3. floydy_floyd
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      It's so 3 weeks ago

      Open Controls
  23. gerrard08
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    pienaar or nolan/

    Open Controls
    1. gdog2244
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      u jut asked that 2 minutes ago u gravless fool

      Open Controls
      1. gerrard08
        • 13 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        sorry

        Open Controls
  24. FORCA INTER
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    in case that Morrison is injureed shall i play Guthrie or take another 4pts hit to get some Everton player?

    Open Controls
    1. Brian (Not the Messiah)
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      what when??

      Open Controls
      1. THE Wild Rover
        • 16 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        http://t.co/2T5iqdKB

        Open Controls
    2. THE Wild Rover
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Well I did Morrison to Pienaar, It wasn't for a hit but I would have done if I had to.

      Open Controls
    3. Mílanista
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Wait for news, the tweet made it sound very minor.

      Open Controls
      1. FORCA INTER
        • 14 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        sounds about right

        i am sick of taking pts hits so saving FT seems likely to me this week

        Open Controls
  25. Tiki-Taka
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Team currently:

    Federici / Friedel
    Baines / Clyne / Rafael / R.Bennett / Demel
    Michu / Bale / Morrison / Ben Arfa / Kacaniklic
    Berba / Tevez / RVP

    1 free transfer, 2.4mil in bank. Need to probably make a GK transfer at some point cos Federici is injured/dropped and I'm worried about Friedel being dropped at some point in future as well as the fact I dont want him to play him every week anyway. I also want to shift R.Bennett out at some point because he isnt playing. Dunno if these transfers are urgent though or I should focus on the mid/attack?

    Open Controls
  26. COMH
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Anyone doing Hazard > Oscar?

    Open Controls
    1. floydy_floyd
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Hazard to Fellaini then bale week after.

      Open Controls
    2. SöundLight 30
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I have Oscar on my watchlist. If it looks like he is going to start consistently, then he may be better value than Hazard.

      Open Controls
  27. Mílanista
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    I really wish I didn't do Cuellar to Boyce on Saturday morning. Not only did I lose 10 points by playing him over Rafael but I thought I would be fine to save a transfer this week and now have various transfer ideas going around my head. Lesson learned.

    Open Controls
    1. FORCA INTER
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      my lession for me this gw is

      -always listen your own CRO sources about Jelavic

      even if i knew that jelavic will be back afte only 5-6 days i still listen Facer and now i end up with suarez(wich is not too bad if he do domage in his next 3 gws)

      Open Controls
    2. Pratik
      • 17 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      That way, I feel better about the wc. I had Rafael, Kag, and RVP in my pre-wc team, and with the exception of RVP would definitely have benched the other two.

      It was the right decision to bench Rafael so don't blame yourself. You would have done the same thing 8 out of 10 times.

      Open Controls
      1. Mílanista
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        13 years, 10 months ago

        Its not just the 10 points, I can see myself taking a hit at some point in the next few weeks because I didn't save the transfer and the extra .5m in defence isn't ideal either.

        Open Controls
  28. Demel
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    a) Tevez & Silva
    b) Aguero & Barfa

    Open Controls
    1. floydy_floyd
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      B with tremendous ease

      Open Controls
  29. Sean.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    worth pulling the wildcard trigger for
    foster, begovic
    rafael, demel, baines, ivanovic, clyne
    michu, sterling, fellaini, nolan, hazard
    fletcher, rvp, ba
    thoughts appreciated, really undecided

    Open Controls
    1. COMH
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      Definitely not worth a wc. You have a strong squad.

      Open Controls
    2. Miracallas
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      No, your team is ok

      Open Controls
    3. bobbypires88
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      thats such a good team...why would u want to WC lol

      Open Controls
  30. Sarnab
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 10 months ago

    Tevez > Ba now ?? or wait ?

    Open Controls
    1. LeBron - King of Argentina
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 10 months ago

      I got Fletcher instead mate

      Open Controls