591 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Stamford B
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    How many of you first 11 have under 10% ownership?

    1. Fat Frank
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      2

      1. Fat Frank
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Son & Andreas

    2. TanN
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      First 11 - foden us at 10.7%

      Bench - mcatee and Pinnock both below 5% I believe

    3. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Haven’t looked. It’s actually quite nice not caring about ownership when picking players.

      1. Stamford B
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Indeed. I don’t pick on ownership but like it or not it will have an impact. If you care about rank that is. If you’re playing for mini leagues it’s irrelevant and a much nicer game if you can find it.

        1. Athletic Nasherbo
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          Yeah of course. Not as much at the start though.

          Trust me I’m a differential player once the game gets going.

          That being said I assume Diaz and Gakpo individually will be differential, even more so together.

          Mbeumo and Wissa together will be too.

          I think the main thing for me is choosing players I want, not those in a pool of differential players currently

      2. The Mentaculus
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        This. Better for me if I don't start thinking about "how template I am" - just makes me want to take too many risks. My team is far from settled at this stage anyway

    4. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      None. Foden closest. If hipster points becomes a thing, I'll revisit 😛

    5. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Seven

      1. Stamford B
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Template busting? I admire your balls Sir.

    6. diesel001
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      None. Gone full template and will do because it is safe. I am better once the season has settled down and have seen some matches. Pre-season isn't informative enough.

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Ditto

      2. luke
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 4 months ago

        Yep that’s the sensible move

  2. TanN
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    I don't understand the confidence in Verbruggen as new starting Brighton keeper - sanchez and steele are very good keepers too...

    What did I miss?

    1. The Pesci challenge
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      It’s just the new keeper syndrome that’s convincing people he will start but i feel its Steele’s to lose for now and Sanchez will be sold soon enough

    2. Fat Frank
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Yes I still think Steele is first choice, and expect Sanchez to leave

    3. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      You don’t spend £16 million if you’re happy with your two current GK’s.

      Sanchez is completely out of a favour and will leave, providing he can get a move.

      This sort of thing is all about patience: pre-season will reveal if he’s any good and if he’s first choice.

    4. Stamford B
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      It’ll be between Steele and Verbruggen but nobody knows which at this stage. The money they’ve paid for him suggests he’s very much in contention.

  3. Deulofail
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Currently have Saka, Martinelli, Jesus and Rice in my team, just in case. If Rice pops up with some preseason goals, I want to be ahead of the curve! Get your ticket now!

    1. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Wonder if he'll go from being a big fish in a small pond, to just another player. Like thunder-calves

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Just another player in a pond with much more possession and more chances to score!

        1. DARE TO BISCAN
          • 7 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          If he replaces Xhaka, he's a bargain. Assumed that would be Havertz. With Rice replacing Partey (surely leaving to a country without extradition?)

          1. Deulofail
            • 9 Years
            2 years, 5 months ago

            I don't think either is a like-for-like Xhaka replacement. Yeah, I expect Rice is going to play more like Partey than Xhaka at this point, but we'll see. If Rice pops up with some preseason goals, I want to be ahead of the curve!

            1. DARE TO BISCAN
              • 7 Years
              2 years, 5 months ago

              Will be interesting to see how they line up. Assuming Partey is gone, they don't have a holding midfielder. A three of Rice, Havertz, Ode would be very attacking.

              1. Deulofail
                • 9 Years
                2 years, 5 months ago

                I guess there'll be ways to make it work. Could have Zinchenko Rice and Timber behind Havertz and Odegaard in a 2-3-2-3, for example. Really compressing the pitch and dominating in tight areas. Boring Man City football 😀

                1. Deulofail
                  • 9 Years
                  2 years, 5 months ago

                  Btw, Jorginho is a holding mid and could release Rice to play higher up as well if Partey's not around.

                  1. DARE TO BISCAN
                    • 7 Years
                    2 years, 5 months ago

                    I could see Jorginho-Rice as a double pivot. Not sure if Jorginho would be up to being a 1st choice starter. Interesting to see how off-brand Citeh turn out

    2. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      I personally love Odegaard as an option. Nailed in my team.

      Multiple routes to points, nailed, and potentially playing slightly further forward with Rice signing?

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        I like Odegaard too, but can't have them all. I would say Odegaard already plays high up the pitch, and I'd be more concerned about him playing further back with Havertz alongside him. Of course, if Partey and Rice are on the pitch, then Odegaard can do whatever he wants.

        1. Athletic Nasherbo
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          Do you think Havertz starts?

          1. Deulofail
            • 9 Years
            2 years, 5 months ago

            Short answer: yes. Waffle answer:

            GW1, I have no idea. He didn't play in their behind-closed-doors friendly yesterday, but there's plenty of pre-season to go. I assume, with that fee and those wages (whatever they truly are), that Arteta currently plans to start him more often than not. Perhaps he jumps right in, or perhaps it takes time for Havertz and Arsenal to shift their patterns in a new direction. It's all up in the air.

            If he's been brought in to play AM alongside Odegaard, then it seems only a matter of time until he's playing there practically week-in, week-out, if he's not already starting in GW1. If it's not working, however, then I guess he'll be in and out of the team, as that is the only vacant spot in attack, assuming Rice doesn't fill it.

            1. Athletic Nasherbo
              • 8 Years
              2 years, 5 months ago

              Interesting, cheers.

              On a personal note, I don’t rate him at all. I think off the ball he’s a bit of a passenger.

              1. Deulofail
                • 9 Years
                2 years, 5 months ago

                I think he just looks that way. Or rather, I should say, at least, the stats don't look that way. Pressing, distance covered, sprints. Plus he's an intelligent spaceman who makes it all count and helps others around him.

                1. Athletic Nasherbo
                  • 8 Years
                  2 years, 5 months ago

                  Sometimes stats don’t tell the whole picture.

                  He just doesn’t press correctly, never has for Chelsea. Aimlessly runs most the game and then is too tired to really get on the ball and be clinical in the final third assists and goals.

                  But, what he does do is offer something different which is always helpful, especially for Arsenal who last year didn’t have as much strength in depth.

  4. Merlin the Wraith
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Hmmmm... talk on the BBC website of young James Trafford being touted as Burnley's No.1 this coming season. A possible 4.0 keeper should Areola not nail down Hammers slot?

    1. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      I don’t think he’s in the game currently, hence they’ll price him at 4.5m I assume. Big shame, but we move.

    2. The Pesci challenge
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Not a chance he would be listed as 4m gk more like 4.5 especially after yesterday

    3. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      I'd be tempted to pair him with Areola, even if he's £4.5m

    4. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      If he was already priced in FPL yes, but he's not so the fact that he's likely to be a Burnley's No1 makes him a 4.5m, 4.0m is normally reserved for back ups.

  5. LoneWolf1989
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    RMT please chaps.

    Ramsdale.
    Botman, Estupian, Saliba, James.
    Eze, Mbeumo, Saka, Son, Rashford.
    Haaland.

    Areola, Gakpo, Morris, Beyer.

    Cheers!

    1. The Pesci challenge
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Solid enough but i would downgrade morris to a 4.5 ST and make Eze to Mitoma and play gakpo over Botman

    2. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Would prefer double Ars attack, over defence. Ramsdale > 4.5 affords Jesus. Gakpo could be gold, IF nailed

  6. Deulofail
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Access to profile on desktop browsers is now fixed - around 3.5 weeks after it was broken by the new homepage release. Celebration time!

  7. Cheeky Reijnders
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    I think a slight improvement to the game could be to switch off the ‘% selected by’ stat for GW1.

    1. Fat Frank
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      That’s a good point

    2. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Nah. 3rd party apps/websites would have it anyway

  8. adstomko
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Quite happy with this draft despite the obvious player that is missing.
    Chilwell would come on in GW2. Have a solid first bench option, just in case one of the Chelsea fullbacks get injured or if Foden is rested.
    So, what do we think? Any advice would be much appreciated.

    Pickford
    Trent - James - Porro - Gabriel
    Son - Rashford - Foden
    Kane (C) - Jesus - Gakpo
    (Virginia - Chilwell - Nakamba - Vlašić)

    1. TanN
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Interesting to see a draft that doesn't have 5 midfielders!

      I personally think 4-5-1 is the way to go with the plethora of well priced defenders and midfielders making it nonsensical to go for just 3 at the back or 4 or less in midfielders.

      This draft seems differential in nature - Kane over Haaland, Porro Gakpo and Son all low owned.

      Could pay dividends though

      1. adstomko
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        I think Haaland could be tested for one of the early games, because the Super Cup is around then too. Sounds mad, but Pep is mad..

        1. adstomko
          • 9 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          *rested

  9. Merlin the Wraith
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Think I'm settling on this draft prior to preseason news:
    Pickford
    Estupinian Gabriel Porro
    Mbeumo Foden Saka KDB
    Wissa Haaland Jesus

    (Areola Mac Allister Botman Beyer)
    0.1itb

    NO I'm not seeking an RMT! 🙂

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      That's 1.0itb D'oh!

  10. Eat my goal!
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    No Odegaard in 1st drafts is questionable!

    1. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Put him in yours and feel smug about it

    2. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      He’s in mine. Unless he changes position with Havertz immediately, he is absolutely nailed in my team for GW1.

    3. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      If you compare to Saka, he's a bit meh. If you compare to Bruno, suddenly looks a better pick.

      Depends on whether he has more defensive duties/rotation, this season

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        I would pick him over Bruno, Rashford and Son to start the season, but you can only have 3 of the 4 attacking Arsenal players, and so you have to pick a baby to bin 🙁

        1. DARE TO BISCAN
          • 7 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          If Toney wasn't a naughty boy, I'd lose Jesus for a 2nd Ars mid. I still may go with 2 mids and no defenders

    4. Sure You Did
      • 2 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Think I prefer Saka and Martinelli.

  11. Fat Frank
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Bruno or Son?

    1. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      In your context Bruno.

      Maddison is good too if you fancy Spurs.

      1. Fat Frank
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Thanks, I always prefer to see how new players settle in first at new clubs

        1. Athletic Nasherbo
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          Completely fair.

          Maddison as a proven prem player might be worth it, and one of the those exceptions perhaps.

    2. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Rash (placeholder for Son)

      1. Fat Frank
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        No 0.5 unfortunately

        1. Deulofail
          • 9 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          Then you can't afford Son either. Bruno it is!

          1. Fat Frank
            • 9 Years
            2 years, 5 months ago

            Stupid me - it basically boils down to having 2 x 4.0 defenders on the bench or 1 plus 4.5 (Botman)

            1. Fat Frank
              • 9 Years
              2 years, 5 months ago

              Former allows Son/Rash and latter Bruno

    3. Sure You Did
      • 2 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Mount and Madders and spread the cash.

  12. adstomko
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Which pair?

    A) Son & Kane
    B) Maddison & Haaland

    Have a feeling Son could play as a striker alongside Kane, with Maddison as a number 10.

    1. Athletic Nasherbo
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      Has to be Haaland.

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      That doesn't sound like Ange tactics from what I've heard

      1. adstomko
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 5 months ago

        Is it probably going to be a 4-3-3 / 4-2-3-1?

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 5 months ago

          4231 with fairly traditional wingers was my impression. But I'm no expert; don't watch Scottish football

    3. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 5 months ago

      A fit Haaland is an auto-pick. The game has 14 players and an £86m budget.

  13. patrick hodari
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 5 months ago

    Rate this team>>>
    Leno
    Shaw, Estupiñan, Gabriel
    Salah,Mitoma, Mbeumo, Maddison
    Calvert-Lewin, Haaland,G.Jesus

    Subs>>
    Flekken
    Billing
    Mings
    Botman