528 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. royals forever
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Thoughts on this WC team please

    Sels Muric

    TAA Gabriel Colwill VDB Martinez

    Semenyo Saka Mbeumo McNeil ESR

    Solanke Jackson Haaland

    0.6 ITB

    Any ideas would be appreciated

    1. XX SMICER XX
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I prefer United’s right back over Martinez

      Personally not a fan of McNeil, prefer Rogers

    2. Ajax Hamsterdam
      2 years, 29 days ago

      No pool attack ? Not overly keen sorry. It's not bad though..

    3. Tonyawesome69
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Need 3rd Arsenal player

    4. Runnerboy31
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I think you’d be leaving too much money on the bench each week.

    5. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      McNeil to Dibling, rotates well with Semenyo.

      Change GK to Raya.

      Martinez to De Ligt (will score goals)

  2. Krap Nottarf
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Palmer ~> Saka worth a -4pt hit if no arsenal cover?

    1. Pep's Money Laundry
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Probably not for a hit unless you plan to captain

    2. F4L
      2 years, 29 days ago

      probably not, saka's minutes being managed palmer got 2 decent enough fixtures

    3. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Not for me.

      1. Krap Nottarf
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Thanks All

        Ill stick with this then?

        Henderson (Turner)
        TAA, Konsa, Robinson (Faes, Lewis)
        Salah, Palmer, Mbuemo, ESR, Rogers
        Haaland, DCL (Pedro)

        0FT Bank £0.1m

  3. Orion
    2 years, 29 days ago

    This fella Ndiaye from Everton any good ? Looking for some budget forward up to 5.5…

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      he's more of winger really. he's good though.

      1. Orion
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Mate 🙂 I’ve got Konsas points from the bench 😀

        1. _Greg
          2 years, 29 days ago

          ha well done!

  4. Genji3lade
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Unsure on Jackson on WC given tough fixtures

    (Bri H, Nfo H, Liv A, New H, Mun A)

    Feel like I would be considering selling him after just 1 blank.

    Worth having for the next 2 GWs and potentially booking a transfer for GW8 or better to go with Wood / DCL who have good long term fixtures?

    1. ritzyd
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Keep for two then switch to Solanke. Easy game

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I concur.

  5. Runnerboy31
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Question - does anyone else spend as much time working backwards as working forwards?

    Let me explain. I’m planning GW13 wildcard. So a lot of my planning now is what team would I ideally have in GW12 and what moves can I do in the middle to get as close to that as I can.

    So I might not do a tempting transfer in Gw7 or 8 if it hinders me getting closer to that Gw12 squad.

    No idea if that makes any sense?

    1. Mr 500
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I don't think that far ahead, week or two at most.

      1. Runnerboy31
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Fair enough - my way is definitely more time and energy consuming but helps avoid regret risk later on.

        1. Mr 500
          2 years, 29 days ago

          No, if it works well for you then great, crack on.

          For me I seem to do better when I don't overthink things and anyway you can plan ahead but one injury could change all that in a second.

          Hope however you do it does the trick.

        2. Baps Hunter
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          2 years, 29 days ago

          Dead ending strategy has failed me too often. The player I have not sold has too often got injured, lost form, been dropped or gotten RC or food poisoning. And since there is value with saved transfers, I'd prefer to WC from a good position and to be able to save some free transfers after WC also.

          1. Mr 500
            2 years, 29 days ago

            I suppose you can have a halfway house, have an idea who you want in preparation for a particular week but there's no point putting a player in 3 weeks ahead of when you really want him.

            And as you can transfer everybody on a WC its a little irrelevant who you've bought previously?

            My scenario similar to you was not putting in Haaland in for GW2, just about got away with it but it still set me back.

            But if it works thats all that matters.

          2. Runnerboy31
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            2 years, 29 days ago

            This wasn’t so much about deadending as a concept.

            The thing that brought to mind was Saka and Gabriel. I expect currently to sell both in GW9. Expecting to sell so quickly would normally prevent me from buying. But have Gabriel because my defence is so weak atm. Son to Saka I’m still debating.

    2. Pep's Money Laundry
      2 years, 29 days ago

      This is another level, I barely think a week in advanced and do very well regardless

      1. Mr 500
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Yeah I'm like that.

        I might see a couple of juicy home games for someone and put them in but thats about it.

    3. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      There’s a principle in project management called the planning horizon. If you plan too far ahead, the uncertainties & unknowns stack up to the point it is effectively unpredictable.

      Best of luck to you, but I just don’t think FPL lends itself to planning more than 6 games ahead

      1. Baps Hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        2 years, 29 days ago

        4-6 imo, supposing we forget players like Haaland, TAA and Gabriel who might be season keepers if fit and in form.

        1. Runnerboy31
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          2 years, 29 days ago

          Yea so I’m probably doing 7 or 8. I wasn’t always planning to GW12 but now am.

      2. Runnerboy31
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Understood, it doesn’t mean I need to stick to the entire plan at all though. More that the immediate decision / transfer has to be consistent with what is currently expect the plan to be.

        For instance - GW5, deciding whether to stick with Isak, go for Watkins or DCL.

        Given the current future plan was for fodder to Gabriel or Eze to Foden, I went for DCL rather than Watkins.

        Was also why I went both Salah and Haaland to begin with. Having the most expensive assets at the start is the most flexible to move to any future plan.

        1. Admiral Benson
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          2 years, 29 days ago

          Yeah, I understand the logic. The issue is that you are making decisions today allowing you to reach what you see as optimal in in 6-7 weeks time.

          But one or two injuries, a loss of form to some key fantasy assists or a managerial casualty and your plans are up in smoke.

          4-6 ahead probably about right as Baps Hunter says

          1. Runnerboy31
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            2 years, 29 days ago

            I should caveat, this is used to decide between multiple viable options in the short term.

            Ie I would never make a transfer that looks bad now because of what it will look like hopefully in future. I would only use it to decide BETWEEN decent options.

            Ie DCL + £3m vs Watkins. Both were viable and came down to how I expect to spend the £3m over coming weeks.

    4. jack88
      2 years, 29 days ago

      i want to give players 3-4 week

      1. Mr 500
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Really weird analogy here, when I played pool and darts for pubs the rule was lose 3 you're dropped (magically never did).

        So I do usually give players at least 2 to 3 games unless its a proper one off punt.

    5. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I can't wait for the gameweeks to come quickly enough, I've already spent my next two transfers in my mind. Might of been a little rash going JP to Wood but I like that I've gained 0.1m at least.

      1. Runnerboy31
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        2 years, 29 days ago

        The annoying bit of my approach is definitely having to wait to activate a decision you make well in advance.

        1. _Greg
          2 years, 29 days ago

          I always do better around Xmas because less chance of hits through -4 boredom

  6. sirmorbach
    2 years, 29 days ago

    A. DCL + Saliba + Palmer
    B. Raúl + TAA + Palmer
    C. Watkins + TAA + Barnes/ESR/Semenyo

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      C

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      C with Semenyo

  7. CunkOnFPL
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Any worth a hit:

    Hendo
    TAA, Gabriel, Robinson, Johnson, Barco
    Salah, Saka, Jota, ESR, Rogers
    Haaland, Pedro, Stewart

    0.0 ITB
    Thanks in advance!

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Nothing I can see!

      1. CunkOnFPL
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Cheers!

  8. Al Pacho
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Palmer, Nedel, DCL out
    Semenyo, Gabriel, Jackson in
    (-8)
    Good moves ?

    1. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
      2 years, 29 days ago

      not for -8

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      You don't need Jackson.

  9. Bolivian Seaman
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Foden and DCL or Isak and Eze

    Any thoughts?

    1. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      FD

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      on WC neither!

  10. BobbyDoesNotLook
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Hmm this has been discussed on some level already but is Lewis now back on table after Rodri news?

    First 5 games:
    - Rodri 3x0, 45, 25 (injury)
    - Lewis 3x90, 45, 0
    - Walker 3x0, 90, 77

    1. Mr 500
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I think it increases his chances of playing but not necessarily starting. Walker being dreadful yesterday might be a bigger factor who knows.

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I am certainly not selling him now. I expected him to be benched in tough games anyway. However, his minutes are far from secure still. I hope his minutes will be predictable though.

    3. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      More mins, will be rotated when teams have tall players.

    4. BobbyDoesNotLook
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Yep yep. Not sure if he is worth it the hassle.

    5. Bushwhacker
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Possibly but not keep clean sheets and not doing much at t'other end. . .

  11. Goro Majima
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Considering a Brentford defender in from GW7, who do you think is the best option?

    1. Ajax Hamsterdam
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I am having collins but might consider pinnock

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Rico Henry if he's alive soon

  12. sirmorbach
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Would you rather have Palmer or Watkins?

    1. Pep's Money Laundry
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I'd go Watkins, mainly due to how deep Palmer has been playing in recent games. Watkins should able to match Palmer's output in coming weeks

      1. Make FPL Casual Again
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Duran should be able to match Watkins...might even get some starts...

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Watkins. Palmer getting only 60+ minutes and being poor in previous game is concerning. I am considering Palmer+Muniz to Watkins + Mbeumo (-4) one day too late.

      1. Make FPL Casual Again
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Only taken off early in one game, doesn't mean that'll continue

        1. Make FPL Casual Again
          2 years, 29 days ago

          Still outscored Watkins last gw

    3. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Watkins

    4. Make FPL Casual Again
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Interested question...was thinking of selling Palmer instead of Watkins as part of a Haaland in move
      .
      But, Palmer is still there, high up on points/ppm, 1 blank in last 4, 3 home games in next 4/5, set pieces, and looks like he can score/assist effortlessly in any game...

    5. jack88
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Depends on what you will do with extra money.
      You can have palmer+4.5 def or watkins + gabriel. I would prefer watkins

    6. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Palmer I'd lean
      On pens
      Extra point for a goal
      Point for CS
      Less European distraction

    7. AF90
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Palmer

  13. Ale Seizer
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Sure it's been discussed already, but 3bp for Haaland? After that?! This truly is fantasy.

  14. jack88
    2 years, 29 days ago

    No mention of watkins. Isn't he a popular WILDCARD choice?

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      He’s locked on mine

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Do you also own Rogers ?

        1. jack88
          2 years, 29 days ago

          I do

          1. Ajax Hamsterdam
            2 years, 29 days ago

            I have Watkins in my wc

        2. Admiral Benson
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          2 years, 29 days ago

          Yes, got both

    2. LC1
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I've been thinking the same. He's in my WC team.

  15. Steavn8k
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Jota and Isak to Mbeumo and Havertz worth a -4?

    1. Steavn8k
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Got no Arsenal cover btw

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      probably is mate.

      1. Steavn8k
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Cheers mate, hope so

    3. Heiro
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Toying with that move mate or Saka and a cheap forward instead...

      1. Steavn8k
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Would make sense as well mate. Already own Joao Pedro though and 0.2 short of Wood, so not sure who to go for there.

    4. Bushwhacker
      2 years, 29 days ago

      For -4 ; no. Wait and see if Jota gets rested midweek ; likely to play if so . . just do Isak to Havertz.

  16. Inspector Norse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Start Collins v West Ham or Milenkovic v Fulham?

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Collins perhaps.

  17. Klopp it
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Who's the better option and why?

    A. Solanke
    B. Havertz
    C. Watkins
    D. Jackson

    1. jack88
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I would say its purely a lottery. All can be good

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      B: When Arsenal get going there will be some 5-0's.

      1. Klopp it
        2 years, 29 days ago

        IV gota saka tho

        1. _Greg
          2 years, 29 days ago

          feast not famine

  18. jack88
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Solanke + wood (343)
    Or
    Watkins + rogers (352)

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Watkins and Rogers

  19. Ajax Hamsterdam
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Is Rogers good enough to play every week? Also own Watkins isn't double villa attack a bit too much ?

    1. Pep's Money Laundry
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I've owned him from the start and play him every week.

      Will you be happy with 4 x 2 pointers in a row before a haul? If you can cope with that then he is your man.

      For me the 10 pointer was a partying gift

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        2 years, 29 days ago

        I bet it was 🙂 well done.

    2. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I’ve got both, but have also squeezed a third cheap striker I can rotate with Rogers on 3-5-2 or 3-4-3. Having Rogers and a £4.5m mid is too much IMO

    3. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      He looks like a good footballer. Therefore he should remain a decent option.

    4. have you seen cyan
      2 years, 29 days ago

      as long as he has good fixtures, but you need someone else as backup like Vardy or something.

  20. Jet5605
    2 years, 29 days ago

    I know taking a -4 on a GK is rarely worthwhile but might it be worth doing Henderson > Raya given both their upcoming fixtures? The -4 could be paid back after ARS v LEI and it helps me keep my WC until later on.

    Henderson
    Gabriel - Konsa - Robinson
    Eze - Diaz - Palmer - Mbuemo
    Haaland - Mateta - Wood

    Valdi - Winks - Myko - Mosquero

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      I think you should yeah.

    2. lambownumber5
      2 years, 29 days ago

      A hit for Areola to Sanchez worked a treat for me this weekend: +6 points up, an upgrade and 0.1m transfer rise. Sometimes worth a punt!

  21. Heiro
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Hi all,
    Don't think I need a WC but have 2 FT.

    Hendo
    Gabriel TAA Robin
    Salah Jota Madueke Rogers ESR
    Haaland Isak

    Barca Pedro Greaves

    Thinking:
    Jota/Isak to Saka/5.8M

    What do you think?

    1. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Yeah get Saka and Ross Stewart, save the money for the Madueke slot.

      1. Heiro
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Better than Mbeumo and Havertz?

        Feels close!

  22. Fantasyfreaks
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    WC, 0.9 itb

    Raya,
    Gabriel Taa Colwill
    Saka Mbeumo Diaz Semenyo
    Haaland Jackson DCL

    Fab, Rogers, VDB, Greaves.

    Colwill position is flexible for me. Rest I’m happy with. Any thoughts on possible upgrades with .9 itb?
    Konate/De Ligt maybe?

    1. Jordan.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      this is going to be thousands of w/c gw6 teams

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Colwill to 4m and Jackson to Watkins?

  23. sirmorbach
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Is it "ok" (as in "even possible") to go without Liverpool attack on WC? Currently on Diaz, but I could downgrade him to fit both Palmer and Watkins

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      For me, it’s the biggest decision for a GW6 wildcard. There’s an argument reduced mins due to Slot early subs makes it viable. On the other hand, Diaz is on fire.

      I settled on Diaz but knowing I may need to transfer him out in next 2-3

      1. sirmorbach
        2 years, 29 days ago

        Very good thoughts.

    2. _Greg
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Get Diaz now, easy to move on later if it dies.

  24. gfcc20
    2 years, 29 days ago

    What to do with 0.7mil? On wc
    Raya
    Trent Gabriel Aina
    Saka Diaz Mbuemo Rogers
    Haaland Watkins Wood

    Fab Dibling Greaves VDB

    1. have you seen cyan
      2 years, 29 days ago

      just keep it in the bank

    2. Strike me a Gakpose
      2 years, 29 days ago

      VDB to Lewis?

  25. BobbyDoesNotLook
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Awful gw going from 200k to 570k.

    Now I can't get over the fact that because I did not hit wc on Saturday (but only yesterday) I lost 0.3 or 0.4 because of the price rises depending on which ones I choose on wc (Raya, Rogers, Diaz, Mbuemo).

    1. Bushwhacker
      2 years, 29 days ago

      You're still in the top 5% when most people are actually still playing. Not awful, massive rank swings are going to happen when all the totals are still low.

  26. donbagino
    2 years, 29 days ago

    Need to drop Wissa, so which combo you like?:
    a) Salah, Saka, Wood
    b) Salah, Diaz, Watkins
    c) Palmer, Saka, Watkins
    d) Palmer, Diaz, Watkins

    1. space mercenary
      2 years, 29 days ago

      B

    2. Shake n Bake
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      a)

  27. Old Gregg
    2 years, 29 days ago

    On WC. 2 Questions please.

    A) Gvardiol & Solanke
    Or
    B) 4.5m Def + Watkins

    1) Savio
    Or
    2) Eze

    1. Inspector Norse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      For me, A and 2, unless shorter term punts

    2. Shake n Bake
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      A2 for me

    3. Bushwhacker
      2 years, 29 days ago

      B, 2 for me ; though I'm not sure I'd have Eze. Gvardiol is shipping goals and not looking very attacking. With Rodri gone that problem might get worse.

  28. ViperStripes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    On WC:
    Robinson > Porro?
    Or
    Saliba > TAA (leaves me able to do Watkins > Havertz in a couple of weeks perhaps)

    I have Gabriel & Saka already.

    1. Shake n Bake
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      2 years, 29 days ago

      TAA would be great but I wouldn't want to lose Saliba before LEI,SOU, bou. Of the two options I'd go with Porro

  29. Thedazza
    2 years, 29 days ago

    I believe squad value is massively over-egged in terms of importance. It's great to increase it but most squad value' is unusable. Eg. I have Haaland valued as 15.3 but only get 15.1 if I sell. My 'squad value is 100.9 but if I sold everyone it's 99.9. Even years where I've built high squad value the actual sale value is far lower.

    1. BUZZBOMB ♡
      2 years, 29 days ago

      Agreed. Majority of team currently is 0.1 up. Big deal. I win squad value in ML every year. Dont take many hits, maybe 4-6 a season, but generally come 2nd-4th each year overall. Havent won it in about 7 years. ML winner last year, when I came 2nd had £2m less value than me come the end. Its actually irrelevant really. 1 upgrade that may or may not work out yet we all sweat or rage over that 0.1 up or down.

    2. Bushwhacker
      2 years, 29 days ago

      It's a stupid system that just drives bandwagons.

  30. Shake n Bake
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    2 years, 29 days ago

    WC thoughts?

    Flekken (4.0)
    Gabriel, Davis, ___ (Greaves, SvdB)
    Semenyo, Rogers, Saka, Mbeumo, ___
    Haaland, Jackson, ___

    A) Konsa (or other 4.5), Salah, Jimenez 0.2 ITB
    B) TAA, Diaz, Solanke 0.3 ITB

    Leaning towards A) as Jackson could become Solanke in GW8 and I don't have to worry about Diaz/Gakpo rotation.