62 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Sharkytect
    • 10 Years
    2 months, 26 days ago

    OK, so my strategy kind of has to go:

    WC gw32
    BB gw 33
    FH gw 34
    AM gw35-36

    So a nice 5-week period with a chip in play every week until the penultimate week, and cross my fingers that a dgw gets thrown in to gw35 as well.

    That all look about right?

    (No TC - used that on salah)

    1. Lord.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      It depends on what doubles land GW33, and how of your Squad you’d still want after the bench boost. another option is WC31, BB32, FH33, AM 35-37; and you can decide once the DGW fixtures are announced.

    2. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      AM is 3 weeks, so 6 week period. I'm not convinced that GW33 is going to be the best GW to BB, but time will tell. Could be just Fulham, Southampton, Brighton, West Ham, Man City & Villa that DGW and that's only if GW34 postponements are moved GW33 and there aren't many player from those clubs I'd want for the rest of the season.

    3. DannyDrinkVodka
      • 5 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Any advantage in playing AM 35-37 vs 36-38?

      1. Sharkytect
        • 10 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        No, just that there is an outside chance of a dgw surprising us and landing in gw35

  2. The Knights Template
    • 11 Years
    2 months, 26 days ago

    Top three most likely to get a YC in GW30? Thankee.

    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      You clocks are ahead of us, so you will get news before we do. Please post the information so we can find out whether to sell them.

      1. Philosopher's Stones
        • 4 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        This is the sort of content we're here for!

    2. Holmes
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Bassey, Jimenez, Gibbs-White

    3. ryskal
      • 6 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Paqueta?

  3. LC1
    • 10 Years
    2 months, 26 days ago

    Would you BB this team;

    Sa
    Gvardiol Kerkez Munoz
    Salah Bruno Kluivert Sarr
    Haaland(C) Marmoush Evanilson

    Sels(MUN) Ait-Nouri(WHU) Cresswell(wol) Gibbs-White(MUN)

    Cheers!

    1. Holmes
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Cresswell didnt play last game

    2. Herger
      • 3 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      If you think Cresswell and Haaland start, go for it

    3. Ravva Nearly
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 19 days ago

      Isnt Gvardiol a doubt now, Hamstring.

  4. x.jim.x
    • 10 Years
    2 months, 26 days ago

    "Mykhailo Mudryk (£6.1m) remains provisionally banned by the FA after returning a positive drugs test."

    Unless there's a new Fantasy Maccies Staff game coming soon, I don't think this news is relevant to anybody.

    1. Funkyav
      • 15 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      it would be nice to know what the hell is going on here with him, agreed no fantasy relevance really apart from fact it means chelsea have v few backups in the wing positions as it stands

      1. x.jim.x
        • 10 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Be better off just playing one of the physios there anyway

  5. Steavn8k
    • 2 Years
    2 months, 26 days ago

    Best combination going forward?
    A: Raya+Konate
    B: Allison+Timber

    1. Holmes
      • 11 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      A

    2. Count of Monte Hristo
      • 12 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Timber is the only player I would really want from these 4.

      1. Steavn8k
        • 2 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Hmm interesting..May I ask why?

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      Raya + Timber

    4. Mumfie
      • 3 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      I like B and have Timber already.
      Does B White back mean a threat to his position?

    5. Mighty Duck
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Ben White has returned after an injury.

        1. Steavn8k
          • 2 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Oh, good point! Had not considered. Puts me off Timber

    6. theodosios
      • 7 Years
      2 months, 26 days ago

      These friendly matches, the so-called Nations League are the biggest nonsense in the world of football. It's an unnecessary fatigue for already exhausted players under the guise of patriotism. UEFA came up with this brilliantly – if you refuse to join the national team gathering, you're considered to "not love your country." Only the qualifiers for the EURO and the World Cup matter, and that's it, not this competition that 90% of football fans don't care about.

      1. boc610
        • 13 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Would be less of an issue if prem league had a winter break like other big leagues.

        1. x.jim.x
          • 10 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          It'd be less of an issue if managers like Arteta and Slot actually rotated their squads

      2. x.jim.x
        • 10 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Players can refuse not to go (and get out of them all the time) and the games are actually linked with the World Cup qualifiers now. The point about not loving your country is just shadowboxing.

        1. Black Knights
          • 13 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          That's my problem with them. If they were friendlies, big stars could be rested. Experiments with formation could be made. Youngsters or reserves could get a chance to impress. Now they're meaningful games, the best players get less rest.

          1. x.jim.x
            • 10 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            People complained about friendlies being meaningless (despite being essential for tournament planning and squad synergy) so they made them less meaningless (but still pretty meaningless) and people still complain.

      3. Humble Bee
          2 months, 24 days ago

          You sir need to check your informations. (Un)fortunely Nations league is tightly connected to other competitions, easier qualifiers and better seedings and draws.
          No wonder so many teams take it as serious as they do. Is it good that they connected it together that way, i will leave someone else to lose their sanity over something so unimportant.

      4. FPL Sanky
        • 1 Year
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Best GK till the end of the season
        A) Kepa
        B) Verbruggen

        Have no BRI BOU defensive coverage in my team

      5. Jet5605
        • 10 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Is it just me or does it seem like there's an FA Cup or IB every 2nd or 3rd weekend? I don't remember there being so many non FPL weekends in a season.

        1. Silecro
          • 7 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          If I remember correctly, this winter was the first where PL players got a bit of a "break" after NYE, whereas in previous years that week after new year served for FA and League cup fixtures. Of course, some of the February and March weekends need to be rearranged due to it

        2. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          International Breaks same as normal but two more weekends have been reserved for FA Cup this season. 5th round was being played in midweek, and QFs shared a weekend with PL in previous seasons creating the big blank.

          1. bitm2007
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            If GW30 fixtures weren't moved into midweek we would have had 7 blanks this year with only the follow fixtures from that GWs schedule being able to take place on FA Cup QF weekend

            Newcastle v Brentford
            Liverpool v Everton
            Chelsea v Spurs

      6. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        WC30 first draft:

        Verbruggen Areola
        Gabriel Munoz Burn Williams Khusanov
        Salah Fernandes Sarr Kluivert Murphy
        Haaland Isak Mateta

        Bruno I think can continue to haul even through tough fixtures given United's uptick in form but he could we'll be sacrificed if there is a DGW option that is juicier.

        Defense is likely going to be reworked depending on how the DGWs fall. Kluiverts spot in a bit of jeopardy too considering Bournemouths middling form esp if they don't double.

        1. Holmes
          • 11 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Thats the 2nd team I have seen with Verbruggen and Areola, whats the catch?

          1. Camzy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            Cheap and both playing for BB.

            I think if Arsenal are likely to double I'll go Raya.

          2. Silecro
            • 7 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            Both with predicted double in GW33 (first game against SOU, and second against each other), anyhoo, I can see Sels easily outscoring them both in that period even with his single fixture vs their doubles

            1. x.jim.x
              • 10 Years
              2 months, 26 days ago

              Well yeah, you'd expect a player who costs nearly a million more than the cheaper option to score more

        2. PascalCygan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Nice. Similar to mine.

          I've had Bruno for his recent good times but I'm undecided on him. He's been great in a bad team but I wonder if United's poor xG will catch up with them or whether he's good enough to outperform that despite tough fixtures?

          I think those of us wildcarding in 30 will have broadly similar midfielders and attackers. Most will have Gabriel, Munoz and Burn too.

          I've had Sels since GW6/7 so he's staying for now. Would like Gvardiol but don't have the team value to fit him and Bruno in.

          Thinking Mateta to Marmoush could be fun if City double in 33...

        3. Catastrophe
          • 14 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          What's your chip strategy?

        4. x.jim.x
          • 10 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Same front 8 as mine - only the following differences at the back:

          Verbruggen = Raya
          Gabriel = Gvardiol
          Williams = Huijsen
          Khusanov = Agbadou

          Not sure how I feel about Khusanov - every time I've watched him, he's absolutely shocking. Only a matter of time before he gets dropped for a returning Stones / Akanji surely? (no idea when they're back tbf)

          1. Camzy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            I actually think Khusanov is pretty nailed. He's been one of City's best defenders aside from a few high profile mistakes.

            But I dunno, I probably won't go there. Your Raya - Agbadou combo is probably better than my Verbruggen - Khusanov.

            1. x.jim.x
              • 10 Years
              2 months, 26 days ago

              Yeah, Gabriel's too rich for my blood and I'm a bit iffy on Timber with White back, so Raya makes sense to me. I was also considering Ortega until I saw his price, so I'm thinking about having Marmoush over Mateta to really take advantage of that Leicester fixture.

        5. Nightcrawler
          • 6 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Bruno is poor pick on WC imo if Bournemouth don't beat City..I'm looking to sell him but with Mbuemo also in the side fa cup results will dictate who I sell out of those two

          1. Nightcrawler
            • 6 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            Poor pick on WC regardless. The only scenario owners shd keep him is utd have a DGW 33

            1. Camzy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 15 Years
              2 months, 25 days ago

              Yeah will likely ditch him unless they double in 33. But the form is undeniable and United look good.

              For the next 3 weeks before GW33, I don't see who could do better really? Bowen? Mbeumo? Savinho? All kind of meh options.

      7. Silecro
        • 7 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        Anyone inclined to keep WC for GW32 instead of 31? Was initially set on WC31 but I'm slightly irritated by the short space of just 3-4 days between 30 and 31 (tuesday-saturday). Also WC32 gives us better preparation for Bench Boost in the presumed bigger DGW33

        1. DannyDrinkVodka
          • 5 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          I'm looking at this myself with WC32 BB33, FH 34, AM 36-38

        2. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Problem is that BB32 might be better than 33 depending on how the fixtures fall.

          I'm even more glad now that I've committed to WC30. i get a squad refresh and then take 2/3 transfers into 32/33.

        3. PascalCygan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Different approaches have different benefits.

          For me, I have TC, BB and FH left as well as my WC.

          There are risks to WC30 (not knowing fixtures etc) but I need to take risks to make gains. So in my situation, that works.

          But as ever, it's the old cliche, it's very team dependent! I can see why you'd want to go 32

      8. DannyDrinkVodka
        • 5 Years
        2 months, 26 days ago

        1) WC 30, AM 31-33, FH 34, BB 36,
        2) AM 31-33, FH 34, WC 35 BB 36
        3) WC 32, BB 33, FH 34, AM 36-38

        I have 1 Crystal Palace, 1 Newcastle, 3 Man City, as such option 1 is unattractive as I can get to 6 doublers in GW 32 for (with option 2) with FTs only.

        The big question is how attractive BB in GW36 following a WC will be compared to BB in GW 33......

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          I'm picking option 2 or 3 in your shoes. WC30 doesn't make sense if you have that many City/Cpl already.

        2. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          Hard to say until we know where the DGW fixtures fall, but the big issue I'm anticipating with GW36 BB, is that the teams that double in GW36, are likely to blank in GW37 making a DGWer heavy BB that GW problematic.

          1. bitm2007
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            2 months, 26 days ago

            with the same chips depending on FA Cup result/DGWs I'm favoring

            WC 31, BB 32, FH 33, manage GW34 with FTs, AM 36-38
            or
            WC 31, BB 32 or 33, FH 34, AM 36-38

            1. DannyDrinkVodka
              • 5 Years
              2 months, 26 days ago

              Very interesting, hadn’t considered BB 32

        3. PascalCygan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          2 months, 26 days ago

          I'm inclined to say 3 in that situation

      9. Colin Bell the King
        • 11 Years
        2 months, 15 days ago

        Is Kerkez suspended for the cup tie v City?