634x258 Community Submissions
11 June 2015 32 comments
The Sarjeant The Sarjeant
Share:

It is widely considered that a defender turned manager has the tactical know-how to build the foundations of a defence capable of returning many a clean sheet. This article examines whether some notable defenders turned managers have lived up to this ideal over the past five seasons and whether Fantasy managers ought to be considering their backlines. This is especially important in preparing for the 2015/16 Fantasy season as it is worth noting that Watford’s manager Quique Flores, Bournemouth’s manager Eddie Howe and West Ham’s new boss Slaven Bilic are all former defenders.

THE TENTH TEAM

In the table below, I’ve included what I call ‘The Tenth Team’. The Tenth Team’s data consists of teams who finished with the tenth highest number of clean sheets and the tenth lowest number of goals conceded for each of the five seasons. For example, in the 10/11 season Newcastle were the tenth best for keeping clean sheets with 9. Then, in the 11/12 season Fulham were the tenth best for shutting out the opposition with 11 clean sheets. For each season these figures are added up to give us the totals for The Tenth Team in the ‘Clean Sheets’ and ‘Goals Conceded’ columns. The reason for using The Tenth Team, is to see what the average team got in each season and then compare it to the selected managers to see whether their defences were better than the average defence.

Clean Sheets

sarjeant2

Ten of the 18 managers featured here  achieved a greater clean sheet percentage than The Tenth Team’s 27%, with a further four being 1-3% lower.

Manuel Pellegrini, Ronald Koeman and Rafael Benitez have recorded the highest clean sheet percentage. This is Koeman’s first year in charge of a Premier League team and he has done outstandingly well considering that two of the back four were sold on and a new keeper was brought in. Over the past five seasons, top-four clubs have kept a clean sheet in 39% of their matches, which is in line with Pellegrini and Benitez’s tallies.

Of the four managers who got less than 24% of clean sheets in their matches, three were sacked and three of the teams were ultimately relegated. Chris Ramsey was in charge of QPR for 15 games this season, where he lost the battle for survival and finished bottom. Most will say QPR were doomed before Ramsey took charge, though. In the previous season, Chris Hughton was sacked by Norwich after 15 matches in the Premier League, and his replacement failed in his attempt to avoid relegation. During Mick McCarthy’s penultimate season in charge of Wolves – and Wolves’ penultimate season in the Premier League – they flirted with relegation, narrowly missing out in the 10/11 season. Wolves started off their last season in the Premier League strong and stable, but that wasn’t enough to stop McCarthy being sacked in the February. Steve Clarke’s 12/13 season in charge of West Brom was a very good one. West Brom found themselves in the top five a lot during the first 15 weeks, reaching the heights of third, finally finishing the season eighth. The following season didn’t start quite the same – dipping into the relegation places before climbing up to tenth. West Brom then steadily dropped down to 16th place – which was when Steve Clarke got the sack. In a month or two’s time, West Brom were back into the relegation places, and finished the season 17th, only just staying up.

CONCLUSION

It is clear that, if a manager who has experience playing as a defender is managing a team who has cemented itself in the Premier League, then they should, in most cases, deliver above the average number of clean sheets. If a team looks like they may be relegated, then they may not have the quality in their defence to keep a reasonable number of clean sheets – which is common knowledge regardless of the manager’s past experiences.

Notes: For this analysis, I did not include John Carver, as he was only a temporary coach. Nor did I include Brendan Rodgers who, despite being a defender, was forced to retire at the age of 20 due to a genetic knee condition.

32 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 6 months ago

    Thanks for this. Interesting analysis.

  2. Ludo
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 6 months ago

    I like this article. Good stuff!

  3. Old Schoolᴼˢ “disa…
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 6 months ago

    Good stuff... been tied up all day and just logged in... thanks for the analysis

  4. Ginkapo FPL
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 6 months ago

    What about managers who are not defenders? 10 out of 18 performing better than average is not inspiring. So they have a 55.5% chance of above average CS's, only 5.5% higher than the control....

    1. Ginkapo FPL
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 6 months ago

      Your conclusion is essentially, "relegation threatened team dont do very well defensively."

      1. The Sarjeant
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 6 months ago

        Not entirely. If a manager who's a former defender is playing at a decent club then in most cases he'll get an average amount of clean sheets or better. The average team is the tenth team, so there are 10 teams below them - not all of these will be relegation threatened teams.

      2. Carlos Kickaball
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 6 months ago

        Yes I agree with AB De Vinkapo, your number crunching doesn't really add weight to the idea that ex-defender managers produce more clean sheets.

        1. The Sarjeant
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 6 months ago

          I wasn't comparing former defenders against non-former defenders though. I was seeing if they performed better than the average team, which in most cases they do.

          1. Carlos Kickaball
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 6 months ago

            Most being 10/18... 😆

            Managers are either former defenders, or non-former defenders... so if you say the former defenders do better than average, you ARE comparing them to the non-former defenders. 😆

            1. The Sarjeant
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 6 months ago

              I wasn't directly comparing them to non-former defenders though was I? I was directly comparing them to 'The Tenth Team'.

              1. Carlos Kickaball
                • 11 Years
                10 years, 6 months ago

                I don't think you quite realise what you are saying or implying, and I'm not going to get drawn into a discussion about skewness, different types of averages, and such like.

                But...

                "Your conclusion is essentially, "relegation threatened team dont do very well defensively."

                Is completely true!

                1. The Sarjeant
                  • 12 Years
                  10 years, 6 months ago

                  Ok, well you think that. But I've taken hours of my time into putting this article together, and I don't appreciate this nitpicking over tiny things at all.

                  Why don't you research and compare former defenders against non-former defenders and submit it as an article?

                  1. Carlos Kickaball
                    • 11 Years
                    10 years, 6 months ago

                    I'm not nitpicking. I'm disagreeing that your conclusion follows from your evidence.

                    Sorry if you don't like that.

    2. The Sarjeant
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 6 months ago

      That would take quite a while to look into, and the whole point of the article was finding the answer to 'are former defenders who are now managers good defensively'?

      14 of them are there or there about's for being average or better. They still did well and it should be kept in mind.

      1. Ginkapo FPL
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 6 months ago

        So you are saying that being 5.5% better than average makes them good?

        1. The Sarjeant
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 6 months ago

          Not every manager is that % better. I'm saying to keep a close eye on managers who are former defenders, because they can do well defensively.

          In most cases they're top ten or better defensively, and we have to select five defenders in our teams.

          1. Carlos Kickaball
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 6 months ago

            Do well defensively compared to whom?

            All the other managers are not ex defenders... and you've already said... "I wasn't directly comparing them to non-former defenders though was I? I was directly comparing them to 'The Tenth Team'."

            1. The Sarjeant
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 6 months ago

              Do well defensively compared to the other teams in the league. I was comparing them to teams...

              1. Carlos Kickaball
                • 11 Years
                10 years, 6 months ago

                "I wasn't directly comparing them to non-former defenders though was I?" - The Sarjeant

                "Do well defensively compared to the other teams in the league. I was comparing them to teams..." - The Sarjeant

                The other teams in the league ARE the ones managed by non-former defenders! :/

                1. The Sarjeant
                  • 12 Years
                  10 years, 6 months ago

                  No they're not. As you can see a few of the managers performed worse than The Tenth Team, so when I compare each manager to The Tenth Team, I'm also comparing them against former defenders as well.

                  1. Carlos Kickaball
                    • 11 Years
                    10 years, 6 months ago

                    No worries, if you don't think my criticism is fair fine by me. 🙂

                    1. The Sarjeant
                      • 12 Years
                      10 years, 6 months ago

                      I don't mind criticism, but it just annoys me a bit when I spend hours going through data, and going through fixtures, manually counting up the clean sheets. Then to be criticised on my conclusion saying that it's just essentially 'relegation threatened teams don't do well defensively' makes me feel like I've wasted hours of my time and effort.

                      1. A.T
                        • 15 Years
                        10 years, 6 months ago

                        You haven't wasted your time Sarge. Anyone who who takes time out for the benefit of the community is alright by me, regardless of whether I agree with your conclusions or not.

                      2. Carlos Kickaball
                        • 11 Years
                        10 years, 6 months ago

                        It wasn't wasted, the article was still interesting.

                        Looking at the data you presented my conclusion would be, don't assume managers that were former defenders will have good defences, there are much more important factors.

                      3. The Sarjeant
                        • 12 Years
                        10 years, 6 months ago

                        Thank you.

                      4. The Sarjeant
                        • 12 Years
                        10 years, 6 months ago

                        Thanks.

    3. The Sarjeant
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 6 months ago

      Your more than welcome to assess non-former defenders.

    4. Ginkapo FPL
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 6 months ago

      The article is useful. The data was worth collecting.

      My problem is with your interpretation. I would say that Carlos has hit the nail on the head but not eloquented it. I'm guessing you do not deal with statistics on a regular basis, and it shows. Thats not a bad thing for a fantasy football website.

      The hypothesis you have proposed is that a managers background has a strong influence on their ability to organise a resolute defense. Its an important question. Now identifying Pelligrini, Koeman and Benitez as the strongest performers, but noting that the talent within the team may be skewing the statistics is a good point to make. And similar with the poor performers.

      However, I have a question, what in Nigel Pearsons background has made him perform better thtan Chris Houghton. Arguably they have had similar talent to work with, but have achieved vastly different results. For your hypothesis to be true, one would expect Pearson to have played for notable defensive teams during his career.

      Also, how has Steve Bruce managed to record CS stats similar to the top3? Has his background influenced this?

      I just want the conclusion to investigate the hypothesis. A major issue I would say is that you didnt set out a clear hypothesis in your introduction, which meant you had little to refer back to in the conclusion.

      You did ask in the introduction whether we should invest in the three promoted teams because of the background of the managers. Should we? You didnt attempt to answer this.

      1. The Sarjeant
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 6 months ago

        Your right, I don't deal with them on a regular basis, but I love fantasy football, so I'm trying to learn, because I love investigating things and writing articles.

        This is good constructive criticism, and I'll take it on board for further articles, thank you.

        And as for the last point you make, I didn't actually ask that question. Before I submitted the article, I added in a note at the bottom saying that there are three new managers to the league who are defenders - to let people know. When Jonty edited it, he added it to the introduction.

  5. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 6 months ago

    Brilliant work, Sarj. Enjoyed the article a lot. 🙂

    1. The Sarjeant
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 6 months ago

      Thank you Doosra! I appreciate it!

  6. FPLiNSiGHT
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 5 months ago

    Interesting article. I had 2 southampton defenders from the start last season on the rationale that Koeman was a top defender so would have an organised defense