634x258 Feature
24 July 2015 2166 comments
Simon March Simon March
Share:

A Fantasy Premier League (FPL) season is a series of small games masquerading as one big one. The difference between a successful, mediocre or downright dismal campaign often hinges on our teams’ performances during just a handful of crucial moments or phases throughout the 38 Gameweeks. Some of these arrive unannounced and surprise everyone but others can be anticipated and planned for. The start of the season is without doubt the first of those “planned” phases and should be approached with caution.

Notoriously unpredictable save, perhaps, for their promise to frustrate, the first few weeks of the season will see many of our most carefully laid plans torn up as we discover that our expensive left-back really is a rotation-risk, while the “pre-season hero” proves himself to be, well, exactly that.

Nobody gets their initial squad selection completely right but, as much as it might feel like a lottery, there are some areas Fantasy managers can focus on to help shift the odds in their favour and set themselves up for a successful campaign. Here are some ideas on how best to approach the season start…

Plan for a manageable period

Pre-season can pull Fantasy managers in many different directions. Yes, it’s a once-a-year opportunity to lay the foundation for success but, ultimately, Gameweek 1 is no different to any other – we all want a good score. No one enjoys going into the first weekend with a team featuring players with poor fixtures, so, consequently, we’re driven to try and build for both the very long-term and the very short-term simultaneously. Often the result is a squad that serves neither purpose very well.

There are two things that can be helpful to keep in mind here. Firstly, despite all the anticipation, Gameweek 1 really is just one Gameweek. Nothing can be won or lost on the first day. Secondly, it is impossible to plan effectively for a whole year based on pre-season alone. It is much more realistic and, arguably, more effective, to pick a manageable number of Gameweeks and let this select period be the key influence to your initial squad selection decisions.

What kind of period is “manageable”? This can vary depending on personnel and fixtures but it should be a spell that offers the opportunity for a degree of planning without any single Gameweek being the dominant factor – it’s a delicate balance and, as a guide, I’d suggest around five to six Gameweeks.

Planning with the emphasis on shorter periods not only gives you more certainty, it opens up new opportunities. There will be rotations that might not work for the whole season but work very well for the first few weeks, and cheap players who you might otherwise ignore that have a run of fixtures which puts their point-scoring potential on a par with the more expensive options.

If you’re concerned about what happens when your chosen period ends, it’s worth remembering that, just using free transfers, it would be possible for you to change up to a third of your squad in a six-week period. That should be enough to fix any holes while maintaining positive momentum ahead of the next phase.

Prioritise Flexibility

The next factor in helping your squad selection process is the ability to react quickly and effectively to unexpected events, as and when they occur.

In the opening Gameweeks, Fantasy managers have to contend with a particularly large number of variables including line-up changes, injuries, suspensions and form, whether good or bad. There are also extraneous issues such as the influence of rule changes: the adjustments to the FPL bonus points and to the speed at which players rise and fall in price have been key in recent seasons. It pays to remain flexible so you can react.

Flexibility in this context can be determined by the speed or ease with which you can adjust your team to factors such as those mentioned, without the need to take points hits or use your Wildcard. Despite being one of the less visible qualities of a squad, flexibility can translate into Fantasy returns surprisingly quickly as rivals spend points in an attempt to transfer their way out of a corner or find themselves unable to move as quickly as you can to bring in form players.

A highly flexible team will be one with plenty of viable alternatives to the initial selection.

One simple way to help ensure this in your initial squad set-up is to choose players from a range of prices throughout your defence, midfield and forward lines. This practice will allow you options should injury, suspension or rotation strike and it should also put you in a position to move quickly on any emerging star performers. Selecting players with an eye on the alternatives and an idea of who you could sacrifice to free up funds if needed will help make your squad harder to derail and quicker to adapt.

It can also pay to be wary of other restrictive practices early on, such as maximising your allocation of players from a single team or using a cheap, non-playing “enabler” to free up funds. All these things limit your options and can reduce the pace at which you can adjust when needed.

Prioritising flexibility is a trade-off which may mean sacrificing some “big hitters” and their short-term points potential. However, creating an initial structure in your team that can easily absorb and adapt to whatever FPL may throw at you is likely to pay off in far greater sums as the season develops.

Actively Reduce Risk

Time is a dangerous thing for a Fantasy manager; believe it or not, too much time can be damaging. It can blind us to the obvious and convince us that that little-known eastern European playmaker who tore up the Veikkausliiga last season is, in fact, “essential”. Before we know it, our squads are filled with risky picks and we are effectively going “all-in” from Gameweek 1. It’s fun while it lasts but that usually isn’t very long. In periods of high uncertainty, such as the opening of the season, it pays to reduce risk where you can.

Despite the lingering memories of debut blitzes from the likes of Michu and Fabrizio Ravanelli, it’s generally rare for players new to the Premier League to start scoring heavily straight away. The same is often true even for players moving between Premier League teams. Even when they do hit the ground running, the significance of having that player for Gameweek 1 is usually smaller than we may think. We fall into the trap of inviting risk into our initial squad selection without a sizeable enough reward to really justify it.

It is potentially advantageous and often necessary due to budgetary constraints to take a few informed risks with your initial selection but these are safest and, arguably, most effective when offset by a greater proportion of more reliable, proven picks.

By selecting in this way, you are allowing yourself the opportunity to gain advantage from your differentials without being wholly reliant on them. There is, of course, no “golden ratio” here but I’d suggest that if you feel you’re taking a “punt” on more than a 25% of your initial squad, it may well be worth you reviewing it.

One common tactic, which can also mitigate the risks associated with FPL-unproven players, is the use of effective rotation. Confidence in such a player should increase with the knowledge that they will at least only be playing in favourable fixtures. In particular, having a strong rotation between two midfielders, or your fifth midfielder and your third forward, can be a very effective tactic early on.

When looking to reduce risk, it is also worth paying attention to the “teams selected by” percentage statistics in FPL. This is not because these stats are always accurately instructive of who is best to pick (they’re often misleading when viewed without additional context) but because they help you to assess the risk of not having a player.

In the same way that a selection mistake is less damaging to you if more managers also make it, a missed opportunity is more harmful if many managers have seized it. Paying attention to highly-owned players and allowing ownership percentage to help inform your selection can be an effective method of managing risk early in the season.

Finally, it’s not just the players we invest in that we need to be wary of at the season start but also the teams we select them from. It’s fairly intuitive to assume that picking lots of players from newly promoted or previously struggling sides is a risky tactic, but so can be investing heavily in any single team.

Even title-challenging outfits often start the campaign poorly. Selecting your squad from a range of teams and being wary of doubling/tripling up will help spread the risk and reduce the chances that you become a victim of the unpredictable form that so often characterises the opening weeks.

Summary

The Fantasy Premier League cannot be won or lost in the first few Gameweeks but this is where the foundations for winning or losing will be laid. Focusing on a manageable number of Gameweeks makes squad selection simpler and more certain. Keeping flexibility in your squad will allow you to react quicker to the things you can’t predict and actively minimising risk will help you reduce the damage these events might inflict when they occur.

If that all sounds a bit safe and conservative then don’t worry – as most of us have already learned, this game has a funny way of being entertaining, however it’s played.

  1. mrzimzam
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    A or B?

    A
    --------- Mignolet
    ----- Kos - Azpi - Targett
    -- Haz - Milner - Ramsey - Depay
    -------Rooney - Costa - Ighalo

    B
    --------- Mignolet (Hamer)
    ---- Kos - Ivan - Cresswell
    - Haz - Milner - Ramsey - Depay
    ---- Rooney - Benteke - Ighalo

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      If the 3rd defender for your team A is targett

      then B

      Team A defence is horrific

  2. Lucy.
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Best Sunderland defender?

    1. Wouter
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Probs PVA because of attacking potential, but not great value at 5.0.

    2. Eden Hazardous
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      PVA for 5.0m

    3. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      PVA if you can afford him. I don't think we know who will start bar him, do we? I'm just sticking with Pantilimon.

    4. Coldplay
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I have Matthews. Looks good for the RB spot

    5. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      o'shea imo

      1. Random Name
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        lol jk - pva

        1. Lucy.
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          LOOOOOL.

    6. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hard to tell who's nailed bar PvA

      For 5.0 I'd rather have Panti

    7. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Sorry, my mistake. Best *4.5 Sunderland defender.

      1. Doolittle
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I'd avoid for now Lucy, I think the responses here show that there is huge uncertainty. Plus, if you still have Panti, you're unlikely to want to double up.

        1. Lucy.
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          I've gone back to the Butland/Ruddy combo. So you and I don't end up with identical scores 😉

          1. Doolittle
            • 13 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Hahaha, I'm screwed if Pantilimon gets sent off/injured.

    8. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Pants may be better

    9. Ludo
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      One of the centre backs... Coates still has to come back into the team after the Copa America, so even friendlies might not be helpful if he misses those then displaces Kaboul or O'Shea!

    10. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      None of them currently except Panti and PVA.

  3. Coldplay
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Zlatan on LVG

    "At the end, I think he is professional and I am professional," he said.

    "Whoever I work with, I never have these kind of problems because, at the end, I need to do my job, he needs to do his job. And I think a lot of fights would happen, but that's something I like!"

    Cue getting Zlatan in at 12

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Next Cantona.

  4. Mr. O'Connell
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    anyone else bet on liverpool at 1/10? nope?

  5. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Right I'll try and make this more balanced

    a) Ward, Hazard and Chadli
    b) ShawX/Jenks/Williams, Cesc and Sterling/Mata/Depay

    1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      A

    2. Coldplay
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      A

    3. Lucy.
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      B.

  6. Swansea Bloke
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    ...After reading this article I've had a little tinker. This is the for first 3/4 gameweeks to hopefully get a good start before wild carding for a more long term spell...

    Guzan (Rudd)

    Huth / Azpi / M Richards / Ward / Targett

    Hazard / Walcott / Sterling / Tadic / Coquelin

    Rooney / Benteke / Pelle

    My only gripe is Benteke...Will he settle in straight away?? Pelle & Tadic for their kind fixtures,

    Thoughts please?

    1. Dezrar
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I've taken Benteke out.. He was the focal point at Villa & everything came to him... That is not going to be the case @ Liverpool.. I think its going to be a while until he settles

  7. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Anyone considered 352?

    9m rotation (Ruddy/Butland)
    Ivan Kos Francis Huth 4m
    Fabregas Wally Sterling Mata Mane
    Rooney Wilson Deeney

    Not too shabby...

    1. Gazpilicueta
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I came to the same conclusion a couple of days ago. rock on.

    2. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Should have 2 decent forwards (e.g. Benteke/Giroud/Kane) in a 3-5-2 rather than 2 crap ones IMO. Hugely lacking in flexibility to jump on any wagons otherwise.

      1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        The lack of flexibility is what I dislike about it as well as no Aguero/Hazard. Could downgrade Kos and upgrade Deeney what do you think Beavis?

    3. ManofKent
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Handy for the all out attack chip too 🙂

  8. Lyonnais
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    My FPL season starts today. Two weeks off work, just to prepare my team...
    The right holiday timing means a lot in this game 😀

    1. Dre
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      You booked time off work specifically to do your team?

  9. Juansilvagas
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Sup guys had my draft yesterday and after being given 6th pick this is the team I ended up with:

    Pantilimon Butland
    Shaw Azpilicueta Mings Bassong Huth
    Ritchie Payet Mata Firmino Walcott
    Benteke Costa Deeney

    What you guys think?

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No hazard - back to drawing board

    2. Hooky
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Looks great for a draft league team.

    3. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      draft league - didn't notice that

      lol - that's a great team

  10. matti
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Gents, first draft and feed back is welcome:

    Guzan/Myhill

    Azp - Francis - Lescott (O'shea/Turner)

    Sterling - Mane - Henderson - Hazard (Wanyama)

    Costa - Rooney - Deeney

    0.0 in the bank, Kun would, if needed, come from 2 big down grades tbd

    Thoughts?

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      just consider defence and deeney

      rest looks fine

      1. matti
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Cheers chap

  11. Shmadz - Le Saux Solid Crew
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    With Eden Hazard currently sitting at a 53.2% TSB rate, is there such a think as a negative differential?
    Or, in other words, a player whose ownership is so high that NOT owning him becomes a potential differential.
    And what levels of ownership would be required for a player to be considered a 'Negative differential'?

    1. matti
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I played that game last season and it cost me dear. Chasing the pack....

    2. Ludo
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      More than 40% ownership starts to have a fair effect on rank.

    3. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hazard is essential

      He goes out and gets 15 - 20 pts in one gw (which he'll do a number of times) if you dont have him, you'll sit there and watch 50% of fpl managers surge in rankings

      he will get 200 pts at least - fabregas on other hand will get injured this year i can feel it

      1. Beavis
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        "You can feel it" - well that concludes that argument then.

        1. Gazpilicueta
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          oh right, it has been felt, say no more......*goes to change team*

        2. internal error
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          😆

        3. Random Name
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          XD

        4. Random Name
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          😉

      2. Gazpilicueta
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        surely this depends on the team,

        if a team with Hazard gets 30 points, and my team without him gets 50, then I win.....right?

      3. Ludo
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        He didn't get 15 points in a gameweek even once last season. His best was 14. In fact, he only got more than one goal or assist in a game twice. He was very good, and very consisted, but not explosive. If he hurt you, it was over a period of time, not in a particular gameweek.

        1. Ludo
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          * consistent

      4. Somalion
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        1 goal + CS + 3 BPs = 11 points, which he will get far more often than a 15-20 point GW as he almost never gets them.

      5. Pasqualinho
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        He'll get 15-20 points a number of times? If the gets it once he'll beat the number of times he managed it last season.

    4. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      It's only a bad thing if that player goes nuts and your alternative blanks

      But let's say Hazard + Chadli gets 13 (Hazard goal, CS +BAPS and Chadli blanks)

      Cesc and Sterling get a goal an assist and say 5 BAPs - 8 for Cesc +10 for Sterling - 18

      Did I lose from not having Haz?

      1. Shmadz - Le Saux Solid Crew
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Entirely my thinking, SW. Which makes the 53.2% ownership of him even more off-putting. Differentials win this game not herd-mentality! 😀

    5. Shmadz - Le Saux Solid Crew
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Much as I like him, especially for his consistent FF returns, I'm giving him the swerve. Primarily for the negative differentials highlighted in this thread. 53.2% ownership makes him a no-go for me. At least to start with anyways!

      1. matti
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I wouldn't necessarily describe him as a herd mentality choice, more of a proven and known quantity. He will deliver, much like Hazard. You can play the differentials, as I did last season, and omit Costa and, for a portion, Hazard, and it will bite you on the arse, imo. It's very difficult to play catch up when you're banking on alternatives that are hit and miss at best.

  12. Jafooli
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Two most owned fwds currently - Costa (35%) & Kane (33%).

    I've not considered owning them for GW1 once.....

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      bad choice

      1. Jafooli
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        bad company

        1. Random Name
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          u should have at least one of them

          only other options are rooney, aguero, benteke - i've only considered aguero from them

    2. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Costa scored 5 goals and got 1 assist against Swansea last season in 2 games (Chelsea put 9 past them). Just saying...

      1. Somalion
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        This

    3. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Same here

    4. walkman666
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I have seen a lot of RMTs and comments from the more experienced members on these forums that have excluded Kane and Costa. From what I have seen, the modal forward patterns with the big studs seem to include:

      Costa or Rooney
      Costa & Rooney
      Aguero and none of the above

      Yet, and this is totally anecdotal, I feel like I have seen fewer RMTs with Kane. I think Kane is more widely owned by the masses than by the FFS community.

      For me, I have two set-up's, one with Rooney and cash for Aguero, and one with Aguero. Neither have Costa or Kane, but one or the other has Aguero or Rooney. I also have Ivan and Hazard.

  13. Jimjam
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Pantilimon · Hennessey
    Koscielny · Azpilicueta · Cedric · Huth · Francis
    Hazard · Walcott · Mané · Milner · Wanyama
    Aguero · Sakho · Deeney

    Too light up front?

    1. Eden Hazardous
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Yes

      1. Jimjam
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks man - where should I save to free up funds? Defence?

    2. Merteswagger
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Actually really like it, a little light up top but looks solid elsewhere. Potentially downgrade walcott to ozil/ramsey/caz to get a 2nd keeper

    3. PurpleCobras
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Unless you're looking at playing 4 at the back regularly I'd downgrade the defence and try to strengthen the attack

  14. Merteswagger
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    RMT please?

    Ruddy/Butland

    Cedric/Moreno/Jenks/O'Shea/Francis

    Fabregas/Sterling/Ozil/Ritchie/Anya

    Costa/Rooney/Benteke

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No hazard - back to the drawing board

  15. TMF86
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Which is crazier NOT to have when both fit:

    Aguero or Hazard?

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Hazard

    2. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'd much rather have Aguero, Hazard didn't score a brace last year (I don't think?). Aguero can destroy you if you don't have him, like he did vs Spurs/QPR.

      1. TMF86
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I'm trying to work out how to make things work.
        Haz to start...dropping to make way for Aguero when fit?

        I'm tempted with Sterling too. I think he could clean up to start with

    3. Dr Joness
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Ageuro for sure. Hazard has to share the spoils with Costa and Fabregas.

    4. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Kun bye a distance

    5. icywrists23
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      easily Aguero........

  16. Dr Joness
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Is anyone at least 99% certain who will start in goal for Bournemouth?

    1. Fresco
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      I'm only 98% sure, apologies

  17. arnojswfc
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Adrian/ Schemical
    Azpillicueta - Cedric - Alderweild - Francis - PVA
    Lens - Ozil - Fabregas - Fabregas - Arnautovic
    Rooney - Costa - Sakho

    Thoughts?

    1. FF Dirtbag
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Ohhh I like the double Fabregas

      1. arnojswfc
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Damn I mean Henderson lol

    2. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No hazard and double fabregas

      back to drawing board

  18. Mr. Grv
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    “If we’ve been playing really well, he (Sir Alex Ferguson) tells unfunny jokes and shouts out silly trivia questions while we eat our lunch or get changed.
    ‘Lads, name the current players from the Premier League with a World Cup winners’ medal?’ he says.
    He keeps us guessing for ages. I don’t think he actually knows the answers half the time. If he does, he never gives them to us when we pester him afterwards.
    When he’s in a really good mood, the stories start. He goes on about his playing career and the goals he scored as a striker for Dunfermline and Rangers. He tells the tale about the time he once played with a broken back. Apparently everyone in the squad’s heard it – how bad the pain was, how he got the injury. The Manager tells the ‘Broke Back’ tale so many times that it’s not long before I know it from beginning to end. But it doesn’t stop him from telling it again, especially when he feels there’s a point to be made about injuries.
    The funny thing is, even though he talks about his playing days a lot, I’ve never seen any video evidence of his goals, so I don’t know how good or not good he was. I doubt he was as great as he makes out.”
    — on Sir Alex Ferguson
    Wayne Rooney: My Decade in the Premier League

    1. Eden Hazardous
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      😀
      That is why Rooney was not captain..........

    2. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      "(Sir Alex Ferguson) tells unfunny jokes and shouts out silly trivia questions".

      I didn't realise he posted on here!

      1. Mr. Grv
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        He posted often .

  19. Bushiosboys
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Defence:

    a. 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0 4.0

    b. or 5.5 5.5 with 3 x 4.5 rotate?

    If b, whats the best 3 way rotation? (I know there is an article but you guys will have looked into it EVEN MORE lol

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      b

      2 4.0 defenders is suicide

      1. Gazpilicueta
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        this

      2. Bushiosboys
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Cheers, any good 3 x 4.5 way rotation?
        I am gonna loko at the article but sure everyoen has already discussed!

        1. Bushiosboys
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          apologies, typing very bad!!! Gettign FAR too excited about it being close (ish) to 5 on a friday

        2. Random Name
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          could be any tbh - look at possibly sunderland defenders among others

  20. Pepin - RIP Absinthe
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Very nice article, thank you.

    1. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      +42

  21. eliminos
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    A: Johnson(Nor) + Sakho or...
    B: Chadli + Jerome

  22. Super Frank
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    RMPT (Rate my punty team) 😀

    Butland - Ruddy

    Williams - Sakho - O'Shea - Ward - Saylor

    Wally - Oscar - Mane - Siggy - Milner

    Rooney - Kane - Deeney

    2.5m ITB for Rooney > Kun

    Thanks in advance 🙂

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      No hazard - sorry buddy, back to drawing board

      1. Super Frank
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        I have my bet on Oscar 😀

      2. Gazpilicueta
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        disagree

  23. Squires FC
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Afternoon gents. Reposting this to get a few more opinions.£5m itb to upgrade ozil to sanchez & rooney to aguero with this team. All nailed on. Looking to save my wildcard for any emergencies. Defence is weak but I can live with that if it means I can have hazard, sanchez & aguero eventually.... so please rmt

    Fabianski / schmeichel
    Cedric / Alderweireld / Francis / Richards / ward
    Hazard / ozil / Henderson / bolasie / wanyama
    Rooney / lukaku / Deeney

    Thanks guys.

    1. Super Frank
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Good team

  24. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Decided I'll get a Stoke defender

    Muniesa.Wollschied if I get Hazard and Chadli/Hendo

    ShawX if I get Cesc and Sterling

    1. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Why Stoke out of interest?

      1. JK - Cønt ⭐
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        best team that rotates with LEI and BOU and isn't Sunderland (have Panti)

    2. Super Frank
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Get Butland instead

      1. Gazza2000
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        this

        1. JK - Cønt ⭐
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          nah Panti is the best choice for stand alone keeper

    3. Bubz
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Why?

      1. JK - Cønt ⭐
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        see above mate

        best short term rotation option until wc

        Haz is the big question

  25. Bumbaclot
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Ok so...

    Mertesaker/Walcott/Costa

    OR

    Cedric/Ozil/Aguero

    Thanks 🙂

    1. Super Frank
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Williams/Ozil/Kun 😀

      1. Bumbaclot
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks

  26. Scotty B
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Is Azpil nailed on?

    1. Super Frank
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      100% after Luis departure

    2. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      For now...

    3. Jaffalicious! #SomosCubanos
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      For the start of the season. Expect some amount of rotation during the season.

  27. Fader
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    Anyone tempted to go "all out attack" GW1?

    I have an issue I want to play 5 midfielders and 3 strikers so I'm thinking about it :

    Here's what I'm thinking of doing :

    Kasper
    Fonte - Ivanovic
    Yaya - Milner - Cazorla - Hazard - Depay
    JRod - Kane - Defoe

    Subs : - Hennersey / Francis / O'Shea / Targett

    thoughts?

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      all out attack with that forward line?

      back to drawing board

      1. Fader
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        that's just because you think they need a big name to score goals

        I'm going on who they're playing not there name!

        1. Random Name
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          to be perfectly honest with you

          Jrod was a big bandwagon last year and he flopped

          and defoe is self-explanatory, there are better options at that price

          1. Fader
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            Jrod was injured for most of the season? Defoe has Leicester/Norwich/Swansea. Someone has to score the goals?

          2. Fader
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            How about Yaya to Nasri

            then front 3 of Kane - Vardy - Pelle

            ?

        2. Shipstontrev
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          So you think Kane will do well away at Old Trafford?

          1. Fader
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 4 months ago

            I think he will score!?

            then he has Stoke + Leicester

    2. PurpleCobras
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      What happens in week 2? Do you bring in a cheaper midfielder/attacker? Seems like a wasted transfer

      1. Fader
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        week 2 francis or oshea comes into defense

        1. PurpleCobras
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Fair play. It looks decent enough, as long as Francis and O'Shea rotate well.

          Without a real big hitter up front I'd worry - at least one of Aguero, Costa and Rooney seem to be in most teams

  28. Ralphie Cifaretto
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    A) Pelle + Ivanovic

    Or

    B) Rooney +4.5

  29. icywrists23
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    what will liverpool formation and starting XI be?

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      game just finished buddy

      1. Random Name
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        don't worry - thought u were talking about their game vs malaysia XI

    2. CABAYE4
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      My guess:

      Mignolet
      Clyne Skrtel Sakho Moreno
      Hendo Can Milner
      Coutinho Firmino
      Benteke

      If Sturridge ever gets fit, then one of the attacking 3 will drop out.

      1. icywrists23
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        thanks!

      2. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        i'd say after today's shambles, Sakho is looking more and more nailed on

  30. Jafooli
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 4 months ago

    I'm struggling to pick anyone from the three promoted teams.

    Anyone got examples of someone from last season or seasons before that started with a promoted side and did very well......started well, first five GWs say....

    1. Random Name
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Charlie Austin last year

      1. The Chosen One...
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        he started slowly

    2. Shipstontrev
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Michu

      1. Random Name
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        This

        1. Somalion
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 4 months ago

          Swansea bought him after a season in the PL. Unless you guys are talking about his Rayo days.

      2. Jafooli
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah cheers...

    3. Mitchacho
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 4 months ago

      Andy Carroll in the 2010/11 season started pretty well all the way until Liverpool snapped him up and it all fell apart.