634x258 Scout Notes
9 December 2015 871 comments
James Barnes James Barnes
Share:

Raheem Sterling scores twice as City qualify for the Champions League knockout stages as group winners. United have worries in defence after a loss to Wolfsburg relegates them into the Europa League. Elsewhere, Daniel Sturridge is set for another period on the sidelines, John Terry is back for Chelsea, whilst Manuel Lanzini adds to West Ham’s growing list of injuries.

Sterling Brace Caps City Comeback

Manchester City topped their Champions League group in spectacular fashion with a 4-2 comeback victory at home to Borussia Monchengladbach. Manuel Pellegrini declined to field a frontman at the Etihad, deploying Kevin De Bruyne, Raheem Sterling and David Silva as an interchangeable attacking trio in a 4-3-3 set-up. The latter opened the scoring courtesy of a Sterling assist, before the former Liverpool man fired the Sky Blues back into the lead in the second period with a three-minute double. Substitute Wilfried Bony capped off the scoring with the hosts’ fourth and also earned an assist in a 25-minute cameo off the bench. In defence, Gael Clichy was utilised on the right, with Aleksandar Kolarov retaining his spot on the opposition side of the back-four.

The Scout Says: Silva’s thunderous strike against the Bundesliga outfit will be music to the ears of 30,000 managers that recruited him over the last two Gameweeks. Priced 0.9 below De Bruyne (10.9), the Spain international (10.0) could establish himself as the prime route into Man City’s midfield if he can replicate his early-season form (six assists in five matches). Sterling (8.9) has managed just two assists in the last six Gameweeks but his strong showing on the European stage further complicates the dynamic, particularly if Manuel Pellegrini opts for the same system in the event that Sergio Aguero remains absent for the weekend. Having found their form again, the upcoming schedule (SWA, ars, SUN, lei, wat) bodes well for City’s attacking contingent.

Injury Concerns for Beaten United

Manchester United crashed out of the Champions League by way of a 3-2 defeat at the hands of Wolfsburg. The visitors’ first goal saw Anthony Martial latch onto a through ball from Juan Mata and produce a neat finish, while their second arrived from an own goal. Man United’s misery was compounded by fresh injuries to Chris Smalling (groin) and Matteo Darmian (hamstring) as they dropped into the Europa League. Elsewhere in the Red Devils’ camp, Bastian Schweinsteiger’s proposed three-match ban will be appealed by the club after the German midfielder was charged with violent conduct against West Ham’s Winston Reid.

After the match, Van Gaal conceded that Smalling and Darmian could miss the weekend trip to Bournemouth:

“Matteo Darmian has a hamstring injury and Smalling probably a groin injury. Smalling could not jump at the moment of the set plays and that goal [Wolfsburg’s third] was also because of that. He had to give it [defensive responsibility] to another player and that’s always a question of communication and quality. I don’t know (whether they will be ready for weekend), it’s happened this evening, but normally they are out for Saturday.”

The Scout Says: Martial’s intelligent movement and clinical strike underlined his manifest talents, yet he remains on the periphery of our thinking as a mid-priced forward; in the last six Gameweeks, the France international mustered a paltry six attempts and one shot on target, despite leading the line in three of those starts. Although Van Gaal’s troops have struggled as an attacking unit – ranking second-bottom for shots on target (14) since Gameweek 10 – Smalling leads the way in the FPL defender standings, with a security of starts helping him earn nine clean sheets. United’s upcoming festive schedule (bou, NOR, sto, CHE, SWA) looked tailor-made to invest in Smalling but if he’s ruled out for any period of time, finding a reliable route into Van Gaal’s rearguard looks a tricky task.

Sturridge Sidelined Yet Again

Daniel Sturridge has been ruled out for around three to four weeks with a hamstring injury sustained during Liverpool’s 2-0 loss at Newcastle.

The Scout Says: Sturridge’s latest injury setback delivers a galling – yet all too predictable – blow to the 83,000 managers that gambled on his fitness last week. Given the projected length of his absence, Sturridge is likely to sit out enticing match-ups against West Brom, Watford, Leicester, Sunderland and West Ham, before a possible return at home to Arsenal in Gameweek 21. Christian Benteke (8.3) will now be hoping to nail down the lone frontman role in Sturridge’s absence, though the big Belgian has struggled to adjust to Jurgen Klopp’s pressing tactics. Roberto Firmino bagged a goal and two assists as the central striker away to City in Gameweek 13 and offers an alternative to Benteke as the Reds look to bounce back from their disastrous defeat at Newcastle.

Grealish Back in Contention

Having missed Aston Villa’s last two league match-ups on disciplinary grounds, Jack Grealish – who’s been training and playing with the U21s – has returned to the full squad ahead of a home tie against Arsenal. Manager Remi Garde insisted he was happy to welcome the youngster back to the fold:

“Jack is back with the group now. I am pleased to have him back because he’s an important player for the group. I am also pleased regarding how Jack trained over the past two weeks with the U21s. Jack is back. I am happy for that – and for the team.”

The Scout Says: Although there’s no quick fix to Villa’s myriad of issues at both ends of the pitch, Grealish could serve as a catalyst for their attacking thrust. Despite sitting out six Gameweeks this campaign, he ranks top among their midfield contingent for attempts (14) and second for shots inside the box (six), having fashioned efforts at a much faster rate (one every 51.2 minutes compared to 81.5 minutes) than Scott Sinclair. In light of the latter’s ineffectiveness, Grealish could replace him in the attacking trio when the Gunners come to town, with Jordan Ayew – who’s bagged three goals in seven outings but suffers from his classification as a forward – operating from the opposite flank. With some decent fixtures to follow the Arsenal clash (new, WHU, nor, sun, CPL) Garde’s side have the chance to build momentum in their bid to find a way out of the basement.

Lanzini Adds to Hammers’ Woes

West Ham confirmed that the thigh injury Manuel Lanzini suffered in training prior to their Manchester United road clash will sideline him for up to six weeks.

The Scout Says: Lanzini’s spell in the treatment room comes as a frustration to the 100,000 Fantasy managers that snapped up the promising fifth midfielder in the wake of his three goals in five starts. It could turn out to be a double blow for the Irons, too, given that Victor Moses sustained a hamstring knock at Old Trafford and is scheduled in for a scan today – with Dimitri Payet and Diafra Sakho also sidelined, Slaven Bilic could be without his first-choice four attackers if Moses is also ruled out. Either way, Mauro Zarate is pretty much assured a wide berth for the time being, while Michail Antonio could profit from Moses’ potential absence. The latter is an unknown quantity at this level, but he’d represent great value at the 5.2 mark if he could rekindle the form that saw him amass 14 goals in the Championship last term.

Mixed News for Big Sam

Sebastian Larsson will be out for a month with the knee ligament issue that prevented him from featuring against Arsenal last Gameweek. Meanwhile, Lee Cattermole is struggling with a nerve problem in his back that renders him a major doubt for Sunderland’s home encounter against Watford. In better news on the injury front, Jermain Defoe is expected to recover from a minor hamstring niggle in time for the Hornets clash.

The Scout Says: Defoe netted two goals in as many starts before succumbing to injury against Stoke City, so one would expect Fabio Borini to drop out to facilitate the Englishman’s reinstatement. As for Larsson’s stint on the sidelines, Ola Toivonen will be looking to retain his weekend starting role, whilst Jordi Gomez and Jack Rodwell could come into contention if Allardyce switches from 3-4-3 to 3-5-2 to accommodate Defoe up front again. Ultimately, the Wearsiders’ rearguard – which has bagged two clean sheets in three outings since Sam Allardyce’s adoption of a three-man backline – offers more appeal from a Fantasy perspective. On that note, Patrick van Aanholt (4.6) scored once and ranked third among defenders for attempts (six) across the last four Gameweeks, but the Black Cats’ perilous schedule (WAT, che, mci, LIV) discourages investment.

Terry Boost for Blues

Speaking to the press ahead of Chelsea’s Champions League clash against Porto, Jose Mourinho said that Radamel Falcao, John Terry and Ramires have all returned to training. Although Falcao won’t be back in contention for another fortnight, Terry and Ramires will make the matchday squad at Stamford Bridge:

“Falcao just had a little period training with us. He is still a couple of weeks away from being in condition to play. John Terry and Ramires look fine.â€

The Scout Says: Should Mourinho afford Terry a starting role at Leicester next Monday, Gary Cahill is most at risk of being demoted, considering that Kurt Zouma has been Chelsea’s most consistent defensive starter. Pitched at 5.4, Zouma welcomed 33,000 new owners last Gameweek after the Blues chalked up three successive clean sheets in all competitions prior to their home loss at the hands of Bournemouth. With home clashes against Sunderland and Watford in the next three, over 44,000 managers snapped up Eden Hazard last weekend – the Belgian has accelerated his goal threat of late with seven shots inside the box across the previous four Gameweeks.

FA to Investigate Mahrez and Williams altercation

The FA have called upon Leicester and Swansea City to present further information regarding an altercation between Riyad Mahrez and Ashley Williams. Tempers between the pair reportedly reached a flashpoint outside the home dressing room following the final whistle, with Williams attempting to follow the Algerian onto the Leicester team bus.

The Scout Says: Given that the match officials weren’t witness to the event, both clubs would have to risk incriminating their players by detailing the incident for the FA to issue any sanctions. Considering that Swans boss Garry Monk has already said he was unaware of any altercation, it seems near-certain that this one will be played down. The same can be said for Leicester, with the Foxes likely to remain equally tight-lipped to ensure that Mahrez remains available for selection over the festive period.

871 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Lord Flashheart
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    streling/silva wallcot/ramsey
    need two and cant decide...

    1. BbBb
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      silva and ramsey

    2. Two is a Kompany three is a…
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Silva & Ramsey

  2. Playing the Percentages
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    Playing the percentages

    We had a good discussion last night about playing the percentages - getting high ownership players in to help avoid a ratings slide should they do well.

    There are lots of different views on this. With some going strictly by the percentages and getting players in they don't necessarily want for any reason other than ownership ( I almost did that with Barkley last week). While others, like myself like to cover the key high performing high owned players but use one or two places for differentials. And there are others who ignore ownership altogether and focus on perhaps stats and money ball potential, or from watching games and getting players they like to watch.

    So what do you do in terms of playing the percentages? Is it a viable tactic for success, or is it too dull to bother with?

    1. Reddonkeyham 42
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Depends if your chasing or not..

    2. Jaunty Jonty
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I think it's quite short term thinking really.

      The goal of fantasy football isn't to beat your competition, getting a high rank or winning your mini-league.

      The goal is to get the greatest amount of points possible. The other things are outcomes of getting the greatest amount of points possible.

      Playing the percentages is concerning yourself with outcomes, not goals - and in the long run won't lead to better results.

      You're better off maximising your points return, planning over the next 4-6 game weeks and seeing where you end up.

      1. BbBb
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        this ^^
        Just pick the players who you think will score the most points - Although I'm top of my 3 main ML's I never base my transfer decisions on who my ML rivals have.
        That's not to say I don't look at their teams, I check them all the time to see how they're getting on 🙂

        1. Jaunty Jonty
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Ha - agreed.
          Just because I'm not copying doesn't mean I don't want to know!

        2. Forget Special, I am the ON…
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Wow - you have never own Vardy and still ranked at 25K

          Well done

      2. Martial Law
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 9 days ago

        Yes! This idea about differentials isn't very helpful, for the most part they're differentials for a reason - because they're not good enough for people to own.

        In my league I've seen guys go for the differentials and end up dropping places.

        At the end of the day, improving rank means getting in players who get the most points. If you're clever enough to pick players who will score big that not many others own then you probably wouldn't have the problem of catching up to others in the first place!

        The only situation that differentials might work is if you're doing so badly that you're desperate and have to take risks

    3. Jaunty Jonty
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Oh and also you're always working from imperfect information - i.e. you're a week behind. So it's hard to do effectively, even if you were silly enough to try.

      1. Reddonkeyham 42
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Yes this..

        I mean ownership is quite important especially in the high ranks. But obviously form and fixtures are (to me) more important.

    4. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Listening to it right now, winning cash ML is my main concern, OR is a bonus, Lukaku will go at some point as I'm not going to captain him every week

    5. dA4s
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I try to do a combination of good stats, moneyball and percentages when choosing my team and players. I have'nt thought so much about percentages in earlier seasons, but this year things seem so different. I also almost got Barkley in last week because he has really been punishing me, but I don't think his stats are so good compared to many other players.

    6. Reddonkeyham 42
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      To me its Form, fixtures, ownership %

      Let's says Vardy if you don't own him (fools) is there any point getting him in, fixtures are terrible. Mahrez could potentially cover the points, shame I haven't the cojones to get rid of him..

    7. Hibbo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      If your strictly playing player ownership are you even playing fantasy football anymore or the mathematics of the market?

    8. Doolittle
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Simply, I just get the squad that I think will score the most points. If I thought, say, Lukaku would be the top scoring player over the next few, I wouldn't care less if his ownership was 1% or 70%, I would get him.

      I actually don't ever check ownership percentages, I like to effectively back myself and just trust that I will get the right players through stats/watching matches/instinct etc. I'm not really concerned what the majority are doing.

      1. Jaunty Jonty
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I agree with this wholeheartedly. It's about max points - everything else is just a distraction.

      2. Pochecinno
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        +42

      3. Bobbydhino - âš’ Saint Slav…
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Best plan for me.

    9. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Saying that, no one really knows if a player will score or do well. Maintaining a core of the main high ownership threats is almost a necessity in this turbulent season. If you care about rank, playing the percentages is vital imo.

      However, my main focus is on getting players who I think will score well regardless of ownership. I enjoy finding overlooked players.

      Last season Barkley started with an enormous pile of ownership and did feck all. Those of us here at FFS who didn't "cover his ownership" did well out of not owning him.

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        The start's gone missing. Just ignore the first two word 🙂

    10. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Playing the percentages seems a bad bet for people trying to leapfrog in the rankings.

      http://fantasyfootballfix.com/fpl_statistics/

      According to FFF, the template team of the overall game is the same as the top 1k barring one player. There's no way you will make ground like that imo. You have to go for differentials but not necessarily punts. For example, Silva/Ramsey/Walcott are definitely not punts as we know what they can do, but they are differentials right now.

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I think the EO argument is that you need some of these players though, and even owning all of them would still see you jump in the rankings.

        Ultimately though you would need differentials the closer you get to the top 10k.

        1. Jaunty Jonty
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          I think the EO argument is statistically true, but not actually useful as a strategy for playing fantasy football.

          In the long run - your goal has to be to maximise personal points.

          That will usually tend to mean you end up with high ownership players - because they are high scoring.

          The only scenario is when choosing between two totally equal players - but that is so unlikely.

          Let's just get back to picking the best team folks.

          1. andy85wsm
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            I wish I could back the best team ðŸ™

            1. Jaunty Jonty
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 10 days ago

              Yeah I mean - I've tried and failed multiple times.
              Like failing to pick the correct one out of Kane and Lukaku over the last two game weeks ðŸ™

    11. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Think I need to clarify what I said on the Scoutcast because I didn't mean playing % or taking into account EO is entirely boring.

      The main concern/gripe I have with it is that we're only 15 gameweeks into the season, and we are already getting posts asking whether or not we should be wanting our attackers to score or not - that really spoils the game in my opinion.

      I've been in the position before where I've had so Kane and my rival has captained him so I'd like to keep his points down but that tends to be later in the season, this early on I don't pay too much attention to it.

      I do think there's merit in the EO argument, and having some of these players will help you keep up, and even in bad weeks you shouldn't see such a huge drop. I just think worry about percentages only and worrying about whether Lukaku is going to score too many (when he's in your team!) is a step too far.

      Jonty, you probably have it spot on. Have a core of these players and then take the odd punt here and there.

      And ultimately like I said on the Scoutcast last night - winning is fun, so if this is the way to take money from your mates maybe I should give it more consideration 🙂

      1. Jaunty Jonty
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I think the EO argument has some merit when trying to decide between two players who you predict will both do well over the next few gameweeks.

        Decision 1 - Who will score me max points

        Decision 2 - With all other things being equal (price, fixtures, expected returns) you probably take the differential over the standard candidate IF trying to catch.

        But decision 2 is such an unlikely scenario, it's extremely rare that you would assess two players to be so close in terms of expected outcome.

    12. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      It is crucial, imho.

      I try to choose one each from Defence, Midfield and Attack, who is either highest, or second-highest owned.

      I regard this procedure as part of the "balancing" of my squad.

      Imo, far too many people are after "differentials" FAR too early.

      1. Jaunty Jonty
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        The whole debate's wrong.
        It's about trying to get max points for your team - not about differentials versus template.

      2. Somalion
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        "Imo, far too many people are after "differentials" FAR too early."

        Spot on, last week a prime example.

      3. Doolittle
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I think there's a distinction between actively looking for differentials and not actively looking at highly owned players. I never really look for a "differential" for the sake of it, I just get the players I think will score best - they usually have high ownership. However, I never get a player BECAUSE they are highly owned.

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          No, neither do I. But I do think that it is important to have highly-owned players where possible.

          It is a crucial factor in my decision-making, and allows me to go out on a limb with one or two other players.

    13. drughi
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Very dull way to play the game imo but with that said every season has 2 or 3 players you need to have. But go about worrying about ownership and basing your transfers on that is just not my way of playing.

    14. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Certainly think that Effective Ownership is important to take into account when choosing your captain as Rodellagabomb's posts have so excellently demonstrated. If someone's EO is over 100% you will be hurt not captaining them. But of course you won't know that until after the deadline.

      In any case, I think that is kind of recognised by the scouts. How many times have we heard 'I don't need to captain X because he's enough of a differential' on the scoutcast? That is sort of acknowledging the EO argument

      1. Jaunty Jonty
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        This is interesting, but a flawed way to play the game.

        Your captaincy decision should be based on who you think will score the most points.

        If you captain a player with high EO but who you don't think will score the most points - you've just lost points.

        1. drughi
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          this

        2. Pochecinno
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          I think captaincy is so important to your GW that I'm being convinced of taking ownership into account for captaincy, but not transfers. Of course, he has to be a good pick in the first place. For example this GW I was torn between giving the captaincy to Kane or Lukaku. Besides the fact that Lukaku is in better form and was playing at home, EO was one of the factors that convinced me to captain him.

          Let me put it another way. This week Mahrez didn't necessarily make the week for people that owned him, but he certainly broke it for those that didn't. Imagine a week he is the firm favourite for captaincy. If you do not captain him then you will suffer a similar fate to those that didn't own him this GW

          1. Jaunty Jonty
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            But if he's (Mahrez) a firm favourite for the captaincy - you've already made you're decision. EO is irrelevant.

            Same with your Lukaku decision this week - you've already stated he's in better form and at home - you've made your decision. EO helped you support your choice, but it can and should never be the driving factor.

            Looking at the metagame it's clear that EO has an impact, but as an individual playing - it's just never a useful strategy to make decisions by.

          2. Martial Law
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 9 days ago

            But in the case of using EO to decide who to captain between Mahrez and Lukaku last week, if you kept Lukaku sure, you kept pace with everyone else, but the guys that captained Mahrez would've climbed all over you by leaps and bounds.

            Ergo, EO can be taken into account when captaining but is a low priority

      2. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Aren't we only taking ownership into account really?

        Effective ownership is ownership+captaincy right? So we will only know that after deadline. At that point we're just deciding whether we want our players to do well or not...

        1. Pochecinno
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          This is an important point...we won't know EO until after the deadline. But we can use the captaincy poll as a sort of opinion poll to gauge how it people in the wider game will captain. We could do a study to see how representative the captaincy poll?

          1. Jaunty Jonty
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Exactly.
            Another reason why EO is not a useful way to play FF

    15. Scoredelario
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I purely pick players based on the points I think they'll get. Ownership can be scary though, like not owning Lukaku recently. I just didn't think selling Ighalo was worth it, and so it proved thankfully.

    16. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Kane is a good example this week.

      One shot on target in the last two, with Ighalo, Lukaku and even Giroud arguably better bets this week for both transfer in (this week only in Ighalo's case) or to captain. But Kane's ownership is so huge and he will be so well captained that ownership becomes a consideration.

      Of course as with all these things I look at a variety of things and never solely base any decision on ownership. The key deciding factor for Kane's suitors is actually that he is a good striker at home to a poor team. Ownership is a factor but entirely agree whether he has points potential is the driving force behind that move.

      Just to clarify as well, I do base any decision around lots of things - in particular underlying stats and playing the percentages is just one factor for me. Its nice being the champion of the percentage game in some people's eyes, but sadly its not entirely true. Stats, form, watching games, fixtures...all still very important 🙂

      1. Scoredelario
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Do you pick captaincy based on the last 2 weeks? I actually pick it based on the last 12. Shows how differently we can all play the game.

        For me 2 games off form against tight teams mean v little on their own. This week I have Kane and Vardy as the top captain picks. Will choose Kane because I think mou will play more defensively than usual

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Usually four weeks for me, but also fixture is key. For me Kane looks the best option because he is at home against a terrible team.

          I also think Arsenal options are good for the same reason, albeit away.

        2. Jose's Magic Omelette
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Yeah I can see the bus being parked on the weekend. Especially if The lads get a win tonight.

      2. Pochecinno
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Agreed Jonty. This is basically what I'm trying to say above about captaincy. It shouldn't be why you're considering to captain someone but is definitely a legitimate factor in helping you decide

      3. Jaunty Jonty
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I guess my main point is - every other factor there you've mentioned could be a deciding factor.

        i.e. his stats could be SO good you have to get him in. His form could be SO good.... His fixtures could be SO good.

        EO can never be a deciding factor - therefore it's basically irrelevant.

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Its a factor but never irrelevant. Try telling those who didn't have 60% owned Mahez this week that ownership is irrelevant as they miss out on 21 pts that most of their rivals will be enjoying.

          Or those in the top 10K for who Lukaku is so well owned and captained that you can even see a ratings slide when you own him but don't put the armband on him.

          Its also relevant this year as there are so many high owned players because the game has been deprived of any viable ManU and Che options and Liverpool rotation. This polarises ownership. So the type of season is another factor - this is a season of high owned players through lack of choice....in seasons gone by there has been a bigger pool of high potential players from high potential sides.

          1. Jaunty Jonty
            • 15 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Sorry - overstated the case.

            How about another way - it's a supporting factor, but never a deciding factor.

            And to those two points.

            Those 60% should have had Mahrez because he's basically the top scoring midfielder in the game, not because everyone else should have had him.

            The top 10k Lukaku issue, okay you lost rank. But your goal to gain that rank back isn't to cover other people's potentail moves (the EO strategy) but to gain the max amount of points. Sometimes you're going to lose out because you didn't make the right call - but your strategy has got to be max points.

            If your response is to ignore a better candidate to cover an EO candidate - in the long run you'll lose points, and then rank.

            1. Jaunty Jonty
              • 15 Years
              10 years, 10 days ago

              "Those 60% should have had Mahrez because he's basically the top scoring midfielder in the game, not because everyone else should have had him. "

              I meant "not because everyone else had him" - obvz!

              1. J0E
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 10 days ago

                indeed, its a factor but not the main one. With Mahrez though he is the top ranked midfielder which means he will be well owned as many people looking to get in a player will just get the top ranked one...that place alone boosts his ownership.

                But I agree with Mahrez I have him because he's a low priced player offering sensational points returns regularly. That's the key factors there for me.

          2. drughi
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Two ways of looking at it with mahrez havin that much ownership, of course in hindsight looking at what he has done it has been a big mistake going without all these weeks but we don't know the future and let's say he blanks 2-3 consecutive gw's then 60% have a player that has blanked while maybe the other 40% has gone for a player that maybe hasn't. Risk and reward or failure 🙂

      4. 42towels
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        "Its nice being the champion of the percentage game in some people's eyes, but sadly its not entirely true"

        I think this merits a proper article from you at some point. Seems like when you talk about ownership, many jump to the conclusion that it's the key factor. It's not!

        "what matters is selecting the highest points blah blah" retort - too simplistic. Everyone knows that. Nobody brings in a highly owned player if they dont think he could get points.

        Considering ownership can be useful when you cant decide - it helps you make a different kind of choice - giving up on making a tactical choice (comparing players) to make a strategic one - chase/lead, punt/safe, short-term/long-term.

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Exactly. Its strategic.

          Fantasy Football , specifically FPL is a season long game in itself. It is about competing with 3.5m others, or however many in your league. It is about getting the most points out of 11 players, it is about playing wildcards and now chips at the right time.

          It is based around football but as the name 'fantasy football' reveals it is not actually real football. It is a game in its own right that involves strategy, just like Monopoly or chess. I think this gets forgotten sometime.

          Glad you get it. 🙂

          1. 42towels
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Cheers, Jonty. But let's not tell Granville. The rest of us would miss the banter this creates on the Scoutcast 😛

    17. Jose's Magic Omelette
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      The way I see it is this.

      In general pick the players you think will score the most points don't get sidetracked by what the potentially foolish herd are doing. It's much more fun to make your own decisions based on the data or whatever method you feel works.

      However if you're finding it hard to pick between based on objectively looking at their point scoring potential (let's say Walcott and Ramsey) perhaps if one is attracting far more transfers in are there reasons for that which perhaps you have missed! Check again and ask people on the community about why they are so confident on one over the other.

      If you're still not convinced either player is likely to do much better you're probably better going with the herd on these 50-50 decisions. By doing this you get the added bonus of the price rises increasing your team value, which can often be invaluable later in the season.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I'm more open minded about 'the herd'. Potentially foolish at times, spot on at others. Kane and Lukaku prime examples.

        1. Jose's Magic Omelette
          • 12 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          I agree the herd are often right, but also quite often wrong! That's why I try to understand why they are all doing something, often I learn something and if not at least when I go against them I feel it was warranted.

    18. Somalion
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      To be honest, I just pick the players I want. Some may turn out to be "differentials" but it doesn't factor into my consideration once. Nor does willing one of my own players to score badly because others own them. Once you're down that road, I can't see how the game would be enjoyable.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I do that too, although it looks like I'm a percentage man.

        Ramsey is a prime example. I have no idea what his ownership is, I just like him as a player and think he'll score well.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Something like 2-3 % (now you know) 😛

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Blimey...top differential.

            1. Jose's Magic Omelette
              • 12 Years
              10 years, 10 days ago

              Ramsey and Walcott could see many of us propelled right up the rankings!

              1. J0E
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 16 Years
                10 years, 10 days ago

                Indeed. I want one of them once Man City is out the way (esp as Kompany may be back for that) and that decision will have nothing to do with ownership and everything to do with form, fixtures and stats.

                Ironically by then Ramsey's ownership will be quite high.

                1. Jose's Magic Omelette
                  • 12 Years
                  10 years, 10 days ago

                  Is he attracting lots of investment? Used up my free transfer already or I'd have wanted to bring one in this week.

                  Having said that Yaya Toure and A.Ayew have managed to stay in my team for far too long, maybe it's time for another hit!

        2. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Should have been listening on the scoutcast! 🙂

    19. Dogba
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I think this is an interesting topic.

      I like to ignore ownership (and money ball potential) and focus purely on expected points return.

    20. Camp No No
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I hardly ever check the ownership percentage.

    21. Pochecinno
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Do we have records of previous captaincy polls and actual captaincy percentages. It would be good to see if the poll is a good indicator of the wider FPL population

      1. Jose's Magic Omelette
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I imagine it wouldn't be that reflective of the general population because the question is who a the best pick, rather than who are you captaining.

    22. Reddonkeyham 42
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Sorry if sound foolish here but what's EO?

      1. Bøss â­
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        effective ownership, there were a few hot topics on it recently. In a nutshell it's looking at the % of players that have a player, and in order for you to be effective you need to captain that player (as you'll be losing points to the players that do i.e. Lukaku who most of the top players have, with most captaining).

      2. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        It's the percentage of the population (where the population might be everyone in FPL or a smaller group such as the top 10k or your mini-league rivals) who owned but did not bench a player + the percentage who captained him normally + double the percentage who triple captained him. It can exceed 100% in some cases.

        You do not have to captain such a player or even own him - it is always best to own and captain the highest scoring players, irrespective of their EO. You only lose out if he outscores your own captaincy choice or your alternative starting choices. But the fact that he has a high EO might increase the chance that he is a good choice.

        It's really a risk or reward thing. If you play safe by basing your choices on ownership then you are unlikely to get any big red arrows but you are also unlikely to get any big green arrows.

        If you ignore ownership and just choose the players who you expect to score the most points then you may get some big red arrows if it goes wrong, but you may also get some big green arrows if it goes right. You just need the confidence that your own decisions will prove right more often than not.

        Make sure that the risks you take are good ones, and that you have good reason to expect your choices to outscore the more popular ones. Don't just take any old differential for the sake of it, or reject all the popular players - many of the popular choices may also be the best ones, but not always all of them.

        The situation changes however towards the end of the season or in head-to-head or cup competitions, when it might sometimes be a good tactic to take big risks in the hope that they might come off, even if the chances are that they probably won't. Jinswick tried this in the last game-week last season and came very close to catching the overall winner.

    23. ROCK YOU LIKE A HARRY KANE
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I think it's about playing safe or going all out for max. points.If you go for a differential instead of a highly owned player you always have a risk of falling behind if your differential player don't score more points.That's why I think you need the popular ones along with your differentials.Sometimes your differentials can become the most owned players.But it is to be remembered that form is an important thing and if someone can click on the in-form players at the right moment he won't need to pay any attention on ownership.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I play percentages as one of many rules - but agree it can only get you so far. And there's a tendency to stick to it the higher you get.

        Last season from gwk 8 to the end I didn't move beyond 1,000 and 5,000 in the rankings. that's 30 wks of pretty much zero movement. Each differential move is either a massive gain or massive slide. Percentages keeps you there - so that's a good lesson in playing the percentages - if you plan to win it or get into the top 1,000 you have to take risks as well as cover your back. For me I didn't take enough risks - but those such as say Mods and Contribs leader Andy do and that's why he's in the top 200.

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Last season was really dull as a result of too much percentage play. This season is actually more fun, even though I'm 260,000 placed below where I was at this stage last season.

          Another lesson for percentage play - it is indeed a bit boring if you focus too much on it.

        2. ROCK YOU LIKE A HARRY KANE
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Indeed "Each differential move is a massive gain or massive slide."But sometimes I wonder if I had owned all the high % players till now from the beginning of their rise,I could've broken into the top 1K at least.I didn't own Mahrez and Vardy until GW 6 and 7 respectively.I didn't own Ozil till the next GW,didn't own Barkley at all,the only popular defender I ever had was Kolarov but after he stopped giving points consistently.Still I'm in the top 50K.What if I owned them all at the right time.Sometimes it just seems to be form above fixtures,percentage and everything else.You just have to click it at the right time.

    24. Amateur Pundit Zan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      The way go do well at this game is to be one step ahead of the template not one step behind, same way you build squad value. You do that by looking forward and based on all the information you have trying to get the players that have the best chance of scoring the most points.

      You'll never get it right all the time so if you dont have players like mahrez or lukaku already, you get them in not because they are high ownership but because they are the best players to have going forward, same reason they are massively owned already.

    25. Gizzachance
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      its good if you are top or near top of leagues, not if your chasing
      if your chasing rivals and have similar team, you need to gamble on cap, differentials, as you are not going to gain to much with all same high owned players, of course if you are top, then bringing in players of those below you can be a good tactic,
      personally i just like to play my own game, form, fixtures gut feeling, won m/llast 3 seasons, currently top of two m/l,and i havent had vardy for a while,never had barkley,,or tot def,as most below me do, but none have igahlo as i do, so its them who need to take chances
      think its impossible to have totally diffrent team, as we are all going to have similar players mahrez, ozil,kdb etc, its getting right cap, and a couple of good differentials
      good luck to all

    26. twoplustwo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      This discussion reminds me of guys that *only* trade technicals or *only* trade fundamentals, or a guy that trades power but doesn't pay any attention to the carbon market.

      There's a balance to be struck in each transfer/substitution that ultimately forms your team.

    27. tisza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      i'd like to add a rider to this in that sometimes you do ignore (at your own peril) certain high ownership players because of who they play for.
      I ignored Payet because of a "prejudice" that at some stage the wheels were going to fall off because he's a West Ham player. That's despite having watched the 1st game of the season and been impressed with him. if he was playing for a regular top 6 side he'd have been in like a shot.
      I got Vardy in quite early but it wasn't until around GW 7 that the bandwagon really took off.

      I've had a pretty template front 8 since GW3 wildcard which saw me rise rapidly until GW9 when my template was caught up by so many people that my defence now dictates the success of my GW and I hadn't really moved much in the OR for about 6 / 7 weeks.
      This was actually pretty dull and frustrating so I've deliberately started plans to chop up my front 8 to find dfferentials to make it more interesting. I don't want to spend the next 22 weeks doing the same as everyone else as I'll just be treading water in the rankings and it will be dull. Hopefully there's a few weeks when it pays off and it'll be more fun than following the herd.
      I actually envy the guy who gets the number 1 GW ranking when you see is their OR is 1m+ but he's just got lucky the one week.

    28. LordRougeGrog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      as Phil Taylor would say, "play the board, not the player". Basing decisions on ownership is one level of detachment too far from what is happening. If looking at ownership is the principle mechanism you have for picking players then you clearly arent paying attention.

    29. rozzo
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I chose Barkley as my Sanchez replacement for two reasons

      A) He was rising in value and it's an easy way to make a bit of money on him
      B) My rival has had him last few weeks and been killing me with his scores

      The fact he was on awesome form helps with the transfer.

      I wouldn't mind a midfield of Siva, Ramsey, Mane and Sterling but the high owned players are highly owned for a reason - they return points every week. Every single week.

      You might think Ramsey is a great differential, and he probably is, but compared to Ozil who hasn't blanked in like 10 games he is a poor pick

      1. FPL Daniel
        • 16 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        What I've done with this Scoutcast question. WOW

    30. the Penman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I've got a real problem st the moment, because having checked the stats, my front 7 are the highest owned front 7 - top 4 mids and top 3 forwards.

      But I've got them because I think they'll get the most points, so...

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        It's easier to find differentials amongst the defenders and goalkeepers, I think.

        Good captaincy choices can also make a big difference. Last week for instance, the top captaincy choices amongst the top 10k were Lukaku 26.6% and Ozil 26.0%, but it was Mahrez who scored the most points.

        And even the front 7 template will not stay that way for ever. If you can somehow get ahead of it then you could be on to a winner.

      2. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 9 days ago

        Also, top 10k ownership of the most popular front 7 at the start of GW15 was Vardy 87.8%, Lukaku 82.5%, Ighalo 43.0%, Ozil 79.4%, Mahrez 78.2%, Barkley 65.1%, De Bruyne 56.0%.

        These add up to 492.0%, which means that the average top 10k team owns about 5 of these 7 players. They don't all own all 7!

  3. MartialMatas
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    1FT 4.9M ITB
    get rif of martial? bou and NOR are the next 2 games.
    get rid of smalling? for who?

    Butland
    Moreno Smalling Bellerín
    Coutinho Özil Barkley Mahrez
    Martial Kane Lukaku

    Subs: Myhill Aké Souaré Westwood

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Save.

      Even if Smalling is out, bench him for a week and play Ake

  4. boyofwonder
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Please RTM:

    Myhill
    Ivan - Monreal - Toby
    Mahrez - Eriksen - Özil - Barkley - DDB(C)
    Ighalo - Lukaku

    Bench: Bego - Vardy - Cedric - Simpson
    ITB: 3.7£

    Any tips? 🙂

    1. boyofwonder
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Anyone? Think the squad is set for the christmas fixtures....

    2. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Vardy to Kane if you're feeling brave

      Begovic and Cedric to be downgraded next

      1. boyofwonder
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Yes. Already have Toby and Eriksen, dont need Kane just yet. Just did Bego to DDG...Need Utd cover in defence...Regarding Smalling`s injury...

  5. HamezMace
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    How many points hits are people taking on average this season?

    I haven't taken any yet this season, as I'm generally quite against doing so as long as I can put out an 11.

    When I see people posting their teams they have all the players they wouldn't have had at the start of the season, like Mahrez, Lukaku and Vardy.

    But there are so many players who people on here must have transferred in or out at some point;

    Hazard out, Benteke out, Walcott out, Sanchez in, and then out again, Aguero in, then out again, Joe Gomez out, Luke Shaw in, then out, Darmian in, then out, Smalling in, Silva out, Courtois out, Kane out, then back in, Martial in, and out again, the list could go on, and on.

    1. French Gooner
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Currently at 3 hits throughout the season.
      I m only a believer of hit if its
      1. To set up a team for the next 3/4GWS
      2. To address a major injury crisis

      Feels like people are taking more hits this year than in previous years ?

    2. Jaunty Jonty
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Yeah only 2 or 3 this season in total (usually i'd have loads more by now!)

      I think unless you see a very strong possibility of bringing in a scoring player (i.e. 6+) or you're avoiding having less than 11 players - it's not worth it.

  6. Sepp Blattered
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Any ideas on transfer this week? 7m ITB

    Hennessey (Gomes)
    Mertesacker, Moreno, Kaboul (Ake) (Simpson)
    Ozil, Firmino, Barkley, Mahrez (Stanislas)
    Sturridge*, Kane, Lukaku

    Originally wanted Silva for City coverage but the Sturridge injury is a bit of a pest since I took a -4 to get him in last week. Sturridge to Vardy/Giroud?

    1. Morgs
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Simpson to Silva for this week and play 3-5-2, sort Sturridge out next week

      1. Sepp Blattered
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Simpson to Silva?

        1. Morgs
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Stanislas*

    2. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Sturridge for Giroud. I'd play Gomes over Hennessey btw

      And then some serious defence upgrading next week!

  7. Sylas
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Would appreciate your suggestions on my team.

    Cech

    Wollsheid Alderweireld Dann

    Mahrez(VC) Hazard KDB Ozil (C)

    Kane Vardy Lukaku

    Bench - McCarthy, Bolasie, Simpson & Martin

    Already used up my FT to replace VVD with Toby

    0.2 ITB

    What should I do with Hazard?

    Thanks a ton!

  8. FortunesAlwaysHiding
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Bit daft to ask maybe guys but better to have Yaya Toure or Silva?

    1. Jaunty Jonty
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Eesh, neither right now. But if you must - Silva.

    2. Morgs
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I brought Silva in last night before his rise. Wanted City cover but also a differential... If he stays fit he's the best player in the Premier League for me...

    3. FIFA King
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Silva

    4. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Dunno, right now. I am looking at Sterling.

  9. Bobby_Baggio
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Morning all. Little vote up on which to go for please? 1FT + 5m ITB. Apologies for amount of options.

    Butland
    Nyom, Cedric, Monreal
    KDB, Mahrez, Ozil, Deulofeu
    Sturridge, Vardy, Kane

    Hennessey, Lanzini, Simpson, Souare

    A) Sturridge > Lukaku
    B) Sturrdige > Giroud
    C) Sturridge + Lanzini > Lukaku + Rambo -4
    D) Sturrdige + Lanzini > Giroud + Rambo -4
    E) Sturrdige + Lanzini > Lukaku + Stanislas -4 (gives me funds to get Aguero back in)
    F) Sturrdige + Lanzini > Giroud + Stanislas -4 (gives me funds to get Aguero back in)
    G) Another option

    1. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      A all day

    2. Morgs
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      A for me, then Lanzini > Rambo next week

      1. FIFA King
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        This

    3. Bobby_Baggio
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Cheers both and for other 2 who replied on previous post

  10. Jaunty Jonty
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Butland
    Kolarov, Simpson, Dier, Francis, Hangeland
    Barkley, Mahrez, Ozil, Coutinho, De Bruyne
    Kane, Vardy, Giroud up top.

    Giroud to Lukaku? Or fix defence?

  11. Saint & Reevesy
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Have the following 'injured' players

    Kun
    Cortihino
    Damien

    Will any of theses lads start this weekend IYO?

    1. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Coutinho - yes
      Aguero - 10%
      Darmian - 1%

      1. Saint & Reevesy
        • 13 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Kun only 10% really?

        1. Your Mum's Athletic
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          He's not able to train, very unlikely, you need nailed on players over Xmas so i'd get rid anyway

        2. Bielsa's Blue Bucket
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          I'm no Reevesy

      2. Crouch Potato!
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        A "yes" for Coutinho which is a forecast of 100% cannot becorrect unless a new update on his status has emerged. I would be pleased if one has but haven't seen one.

  12. _Gunner
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Current team: 1FT, 4.9 itb

    Butland Schmeicel
    Kolarov Moreno Francis Cedric Saylor*
    Mane Hazard Yaya Mahrez Lingard
    Kane Vardy Lukaku

    Which is a better use of a FT?

    A- Cedric > Toby/Dier
    B- Mane > Ramsey/Coutinho
    C- other

    1. Mata-Is-The-Juan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      B IMO. I'd go with Walcott if he's cleared by Wenger to play. Otherwise, Ramsey it is.

    2. FIFA King
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      B

      1. FIFA King
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Ramsey

  13. Mata-Is-The-Juan
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Any merit to punting on Bony? Be will be home to his former team who are absolutely sh!t atm.

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      City might line up 433 again though

      1. Mata-Is-The-Juan
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        That was the worry but he did score important goals coming off then bench. 75% leaning towards the idea.

    2. Lovren an elevator
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I see your logic. It would be a good call if it wasn't for the interchangeable front 3 playing well together last night meaning he may not even start

      1. Mata-Is-The-Juan
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Sensible words.

        Cheers.

    3. Bobby_Baggio
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Problem is last game he offered nothing

      1. Mata-Is-The-Juan
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        In the CL or we talking league?

        I could very well be falling for the old 'player will do well against his former club' hype.

        1. Bobby_Baggio
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          League mate - he was so poor against stoke

    4. French Gooner
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I fancy any city player this week end tbh

  14. Mind över Mata
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Assuming Aguero is out this week would you bring in Lukaku??

    Current forwards are Aguero, Kane and Vardy

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Yarp

    2. Mata-Is-The-Juan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Definitely one of the obvious picks. With Kane being the other.

    3. Lovren an elevator
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      100 %

  15. Lovren an elevator
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Who out of the following, is likely to start this GW?

    Jenkinson
    Firmino
    Sinclair
    Rooney

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Firmino

      1. Lovren an elevator
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Do u know why Jenkinson was dropped last week?
        And whether Rooney is gonna be fit?

        1. Teddy Brewski
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Form.

          Getting rid of Rooney has to be your priority though

          1. Lovren an elevator
            • 10 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            I don't have any of these guys. My opponent this weekend had them. I'm trying to gauge his chances to decide whether I need to use a wildcard chip.
            He's got double Arsenal defense and sterling and Vardy. They're his only threats, do you rate any of their chances this GW?

            1. Teddy Brewski
              • 11 Years
              10 years, 10 days ago

              If you don't use your wildcard soon you'll lose it

      2. Mata-Is-The-Juan
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        ^This.

        He's also the only one on that list worth getting in.

  16. Teddy Brewski
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Definitely

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Reply to MOM

  17. AK â­
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Here's my team, what would you do? Some adviced to save, some to sort out the bench.

    Myhill
    Zouma Bellerin Moreno
    Hazard KdB Ozil Mahrez
    Kane Lukaku Vardy

    Mccarthy Williams Westwood Targett

    1.7 itb, 1 FT

    1. Mata-Is-The-Juan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Barring injury, save. 2FTs next GW should sort out your bench.

    2. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Save.

      WBA defender to double up with Myhill next week for Williams i'd say

  18. Kings of Lyon ★
    • 15 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    A few midfield options to choose from this week -

    A) KDB
    B) Silva
    C) Ramsey
    D) Walcott

    Inb your opinion which order should these be considered?

    1. French Gooner
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      A - C - B - D

    2. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      A C B D

    3. Mata-Is-The-Juan
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      At this moment ---
      In the order you have them.

      Should Wenger confirm Walcott is fit and will start he shares #2 spot with Silva IMO.

    4. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      D)
      C)
      B)
      A)

      Imo.

      I would also put Sterling in the mix ... at the top.

      1. Kings of Lyon ★
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Interesting that you put KdB at the bottom. Sterling is another option. Thanks

  19. RustyBz
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    If you had to keep one for the next 5/6 game weeks, who would it be:

    Mane or Ayew?

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Ayew, particularly if a new gaffer comes in

    2. French Gooner
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I d transfer both out even if i have to take a hit - brought in mane for villa at home and got 2 pts ffs - he s out this gw

      1. RustyBz
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Theres no need, because one of them is going to go out for Ramsey and the other be a bench rotation.

  20. Elijah's Wood
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    So bringing in Sturridge last week for a -4 and captaining him is probably the stupidest thing ive done this year, what is my course of action now?

    A) Play Gosling vs Liverpool, play 2-5-3
    B) Play Nyom vs Sunderland, play 2-4-4
    C) -4 to get Sturridge out, play 3-4-3

    1. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Get rid of Sturridge, the man is made out of glass

      1. Elijah's Wood
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        But do i sacrifice -8 points in total on him (transfer him out this week as a hit) or wait until next week to use the FT on him?

        1. RustyBz
          • 10 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          If you can get out a decent team with him on the bench then yeah, if not then take the hit

  21. Piggs Boson
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    All the high ownership in my XI is depressing:

    11.4%
    34% - 5.5% - 2.5%
    1.5%* - 28.1% - 44.6% - 61.7%
    48% - 31.3% - 26.6%

    10.9% - 0.5% - 4.7% - 7.2%

    *possible captain

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Walcott skipper?

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Depends on tonight 🙂

        I won't risk it if he doesn't make an appearance today.

    2. BabyB
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      1.5%=walcott? I like that move if it is. Be interesting to see his gametime tonight though.

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Yeah, it's Theo. I'll be watching him closely tonight.

        1. andy85wsm
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          I must watch the game tonight actually, key decisions to be made.

          Did you watch the scoutcast? 🙂

          1. Piggs Boson
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Yes, it was terrific. Loved the points you made, especially about Theo's minutes after injury 😉

    3. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Similar to mine. Some of them are unfortunately necessary though.

  22. GreennRed
    • 14 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Anyone able to change captain on UCL?

    Browser ?

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Not working for me. (Firefox)
      Not that I want to change it though.

      1. GreennRed
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Ronaldo man. Tried IE, Chrome, Dolphin. No option. W@nkers!

        1. Epic Fail
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Typical Uefa shite site.

  23. The Mighty Whites
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Who to replace Lanzini with? Got 7.3...

    Arnautovic? Deulofeu? Wijnaldum?

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      B

    2. Lovren an elevator
      • 10 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I would say deulofeu but looking at fixtures I'm not sure how long evertons fixtures are strong for now? If not then tough call, wijnaldum should get more regular returns but I fancy getting Arnautovic in myself as after scoring against Chelsea and Man city, he looks undroppable and fixture proof
      ....so basically tough call! Check how many more good fixtures everton have and base your decision on that

  24. Saint & Reevesy
    • 13 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Who the hell is going to start for UTD this weekend?

    Do they have 11 fit lads?

    1. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      De Gea

      Varela - Smalling(McNair) Blind - Borthwick-Jackson

      Carrick Schweinsteiger

      Lingard Mata Depay

      Martial

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Smalling and McNair are injured aren't they?

        1. Beavis
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          McNair was on the bench yesterday and Smalling is doubtful.

    2. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I reckon Cisse will keep his place up front.

    3. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      ............DDG
      BJ Carrick Blind Varela
      ......Scwein Fellaini
      .Lingard..Mata...Depay
      ............Martial

  25. Captain Blanks
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    To those who own Vardy + Mahrez

    What are your plans given the upcoming fixture run?

    1. Christina.
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      hold

    2. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Keep playing them. They are big hitters. You wouldn't be worried about holding onto players like Silva for a 'tough' run.

      These guys are the league leaders.

      1. Christina.
        • 15 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        +1

        The are what Kane was at 5.5m last year. Keepers.

      2. Captain Blanks
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Good point. They're like the duracell bunny atm, they just keep going on and on

    3. Hamstergod
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      stop benching them 😀

    4. Bielsa's Blue Bucket
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      keep both

    5. Jose's Magic Omelette
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      If I wasn't a Chelsea fan I think I'd be playing both this week... one of the pitfalls of supporting a team in the Premier League is that it can cloud your judgement when making FPL decisions.

    6. LordRougeGrog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Own both , i m going to go Vardy - Kane . Leicester fixtures not the best, due a blip in their form; Mahrez gives me cover and he only cost me 5,6 so he's a big enabler.

      I might regret it but I also want more Spurs given their run of games.

  26. Japan Boy
    • 10 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Team most likely for a clean sheet this weekend?

    1. GunnerStorm
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Stoke

    2. Jose's Magic Omelette
      • 12 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Spuds.

  27. trinzoo
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    Azpi > Kolarov for free ? Got Moreno and Rose already.
    Wanted UTD def but now I don't.

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I wouldn't be in a rush to bring in a Man City defender until Kompany is back.

      1. trinzoo
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        I need def for 3 GWs (still have WC), Swansea and Sunderland home seems like 100% cs, and his attacking potential lately...

  28. Camp No No
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    If season ended now, would Mahrez be the player of the season? Or in other words, is Mahrez the player of the season so far?

    1. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      I think Ozil

      1. Camp No No
        • 12 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Özil's been excellent, and may have a greater potential to be the player of the whole season, but he has hardly been as spectacular as Mahrez in this early season, and Mahrez has more of the attack to carry on his shoulders as well, playing for a significantly weaker team.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Mahrez is just about goals and assists imo....Ozil is much more with his passing and ball control

          1. Beavis
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Goals and assists win you games. 🙂

          2. Camp No No
            • 12 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Not half true. Firstly, Mahrez does more defensive work; secondly, Mahrez creates the team's attacks by bringing the ball past the opposition defenders, being the top dribbler of the league this season (definitely doesn't lose to Özil in ball control that is Mahrez's strong point). They play for teams with different styles, Leicester doesn't control the game by passing, they break opponents game with fast attacks. Mahrez is the key figure in that.

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 11 Years
              10 years, 10 days ago

              Mahrez has been dropped for 'defensive reason'

              Mahrez cant use his right foot for fecks sake

  29. Eden Hazardous
    • 11 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    If Aguero is out , do we expect Bony to play striker or Sterling?

    1. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Sterling

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        Thanks!

    2. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Rotation.

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        10 years, 10 days ago

        ?

        1. Epic Fail
          • 15 Years
          10 years, 10 days ago

          Sometimes Sterling, sometimes Bony. Could be either.

          1. Eden Hazardous
            • 11 Years
            10 years, 10 days ago

            Oh..thanks!

    3. Beavis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      10 years, 10 days ago

      Bony this week at least.

  30. England's Number 1
    • 12 Years
    10 years, 10 days ago

    My team. Finally back in the top mill.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tl595H9Juo