140 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. John Colby (C)
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Reposted -
    Timing of a Wildcard:

    My team needs a complete overhaul frankly after an underwhelming opening 11 game weeks to this season. But - I never seem to post a decent/competitive score in the first game week after the international break. I’m wondering whether to play the WC in GW 13 instead of GW 12.
    The Pros: We will know more about Saka’s fitness, if Haaland is going to kick-on after his recent hat trick, if City’s defensive woes will have eased and at least we’ll have seen how Man U look under Amorim’s first game in charge.
    The cons: I’ve had a dreadful start to the season - already 150 points behind the leaders in a mini-league, Despite owning Salah and Haaland I’m likely going to have to go -4 pts to have a decent starting 11 for gw 12 and hope an injury to Mbuemo clears up. No Arsenal or Chelsea attacking coverage either.

    Should I WC in 13 or 12 guys?

    1. Don Rogers FC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I am in same boat and waiting for 13

      1. John Colby (C)
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Yeah as a Haaland owner I don’t mind captaining him this gw. I’m still in 2 minds about keeping him or moving him out.

    2. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      (I replied in the other post but you probably didn't see it.)
      Can you post your team to give us a better idea of how bad things are right now?

      1. John Colby (C)
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Henderson
        TAA Gabriel Robinson Lewis
        Salah Kulsevski Mbemuo
        Haaland Hojlund Strand-Larson

        Bench fodder

        1. Captain Mal
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Do you have an easy way to get to Palmer without the WC?

          1. John Colby (C)
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            Only if I move Salah out unfortuntely. Jackson is an interesting differential though to Palmer?

            1. Captain Mal
              • 1 Year
              1 year, 1 month ago

              Jackson is good, yes, but in my opinion he should complement Palmer, not replace him. I'd lean towards a WC.

        2. Waylander
          • 9 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Hojlund, Strand-Larsen, Kulu, Lewis, TAA, Henderson can all go. WC time.

    3. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      150 points down the time is now!

      1. John Colby (C)
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        That was my initial thought Waylander. But I’m not confident about choosing between Saka (injuries) and Havertz (now Odegaard is back), Palmer or Jackson (big differential), if Salah is worth it given their next 5 game weeks not looking great, if Haaland is for keeps or not. So much indecision.

        1. Waylander
          • 9 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          I've gone with Bruno in place of Saka until GW 13/14, you could do the same.
          There's better options than Havertz up front and Arsenal are hardly making themselves essential currently.
          Palmer is a must, Jackson also a fine choice.
          Salah is fully rested and against leaky SOU this week so he's easy captain.
          Haaland to be kept if you're bullish on him. If you're not sure then dump him til GW 18/19 and Man City prove they are back in business.

    4. FPL Insanity
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I've pushed the button for a WC12 as I was behind my mates, like yourself. Massive bonus for me was that a Haaland-less draft looks 1000x better than before and I'm confident even a good few GW's by him will still be absorbed via a higher average in the team

    5. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I would question some of those 'pros' tbh...
      I really dislike using international 'form' as part of FPL decisions, especially a glorified friendly against Kazakhstan, and I think Spurs will trouble City defensively. Also feel it might be a bit late (or early, depending on how you look at it) for Man Utd players if you wait another week given the fixtures in 14-16.

      I also think going into this run from 12 without Palmer could really hurt, and might be a good opportunity to double up. Arsenal decisions could benefit from waiting a week, but overall I think I'd prefer WC12 if you're unhappy with your team

    6. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      You can pick players that have kicked on while you wait for other players to kick on.

  2. Sheffield Wednesday
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Chris Wood owners may be pleased to know he's scored five in two matches against the titans of football - Vanuatu and Samoa. Just got subbed after getting a hat-trick - no injury.

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I once sat next to the Prime Minister of Samoa and he asked if he could have my oka, a raw fish ceviche type dish in coconut milk, which I wasn’t going to eat. I gave it to him gladly, but later in life I came to appreciate the dish!

      1. Warby84
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Ceviche is the best way to eat seafood

        1. The Knights Template
          • 12 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Agree, kinilaw is mine favourite.

    2. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Just for that I'm benching him this week.

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 5 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I don't have Chris, so I'll have to play Haaland who only scored four goals over the IB.

        1. _Greg
          • 15 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Norway win quite often these days.

        2. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Kazakhstan are 107th in the world btw, just above Comoros.

  3. Letsgo!
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Sanchez nailed starter for chelsea?

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I see people keep predicting he will get dropped but he never does.

    2. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      "Unsubscribe"

    3. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I would avoid personally, If you want in on the defence just get Colwill. I would live Jørgensen at 4.2 though!

      1. x.jim.x
        • 11 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I can't believe they bought him in the first place: https://x.com/Thomasconlin17/status/1804198884274471256

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 7 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Yup, sold to Chelsea when he was Brighton's 3rd choice GK and Poch dropped him for Petrovic

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            Crazy business - even worse when you consider Brighton used the fee to replace him with an infinitely better keeper. Had the likes of Vicario, Henderson and Flekken moving for cheap too (or they could have got Onana with the money they were chucking about).

      2. Tazah
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        are they forgetting ramsdale? feels like he's made 10 errors leading to goals for southampton

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          He's dog, but not even on this list: https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/players/error_lead_to_goal

          1. Tazah
            • 7 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            Haha that's mad, even garnacho is on that list

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              1 year, 1 month ago

              I honestly can't even think what that could be, not closing Caicedo down maybe? Seems very harsh if so.

  4. _Greg
    • 15 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    If you are on Bruno Palmer Saka Salah, Semenyo does have reasonable fixtures when Bruno plays Arsenal and City if that excites you. Selling Mbeumo is still difficult at the minute with Leicester on the horizon.

  5. J to the T
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Salah Solanke -> Palmer Isak for free?

    Or hold Salah and go without palmer

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Ideally go with both Salah and Palmer.

      Palmer is "essential" when looking at long term fixtures imo

    2. Drizzle
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      You're considering selling... Salah?

    3. Kaneyonero
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I'm captaining Salah and have Palmer
      Thinking of going Solanke to Wissa/Isak . It's toss between them 2

      1. J to the T
        • 8 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        So do I sell Haaland then?!

        1. Captain Mal
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 1 month ago

          It's your call, all of them are great, you have to decide which one you consider less "essential". In other words, pick your poison.

  6. Dubem_FC
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    I know LiveFPL beat FPL statistics with their price prediction last night. How did they fare against FFHub?

  7. Qaiss
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Don't even know the results of the England games. Thankfully no more international breaks until March

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Subway Socceroos drew 0-0 with Saudi Arabia.

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Standard fare - the Irish went on about how much they hate the English for a day or so, got absolutely pumped, then went back to supporting English teams again.

  8. Kaneyonero
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Isak or Wissa or JP. Have Mbeumo, Raul and Cunha the other 2 strikers.

    1. Warby84
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Isak

    2. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Isak if money no object

  9. Dutchy FPL
    • 2 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Is Garnacho --> Bruno worth a -4? Could be a hit for just two weeks, with a move from Bruno --> Saka in GW14. The man is in great form and Garnacho not a nailed starter.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      No, just keep Garnacho and hope you get lucky

    2. Warby84
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I would

    3. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      nah leave it

  10. MIGHTY JOE
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Logging in after a week off… Look at all those colors on my team!!! Semenyo, Foden and Mbeumo have all joined TAA. What is going on?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Internationally break before busy December period init

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        International*

    2. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Why did you take a week off?

    3. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Didn't see your name in the FPL Towers holiday tracker 😉

  11. Warby84
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Raya (Fab)
    Trent Gabriel Hall (Robinson Faes)
    Fernandes Salah (c) Palmer Mbeumo Rogers
    Isak Cunha (Wissa)

    Gtg if all fit? Robinson comes in if Trent is out..

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Why bench Wissa?

    2. Dazzler
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      GtG. I'd play Wissa over Rogers this week though (think the flag will disappear)

    3. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I would play Wissa over Mbeumo

  12. Lucky Z
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    A. Salah | Palmer | Bruno | Mbeumo | 4.5
    Haaland | Cunha | Wissa

    B. Salah | Palmer | Bruno | Mbeumo | Son/Saka
    Jackson | Cunha | Wissa

    Guys currenly on B with Gabriel in defence. What do yiu think on moving on A without premium defs to get Haaland if he rebuilts his form in PL?

    1. Dazzler
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      sorry, don't understand the question

      1. Lucky Z
        • 8 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        A. Haaland + Winks + Hall
        B. Jackson + Son + Gabriel

        1. Captain Mal
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 1 month ago

          I also think Haaland will start scoring more regularly, but I would be too uncomfortable without a proper substitute, so B for me.

    2. Gubby-Allen
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      A definitely

    3. One for All
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      B

    4. Artemis Titans
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I went with an A type option. Budget Def
      Raya (fab)
      Davis, Robinson, VDB (Greaves,Ned)
      Salah, Palmer (c), Bruno, Amad (Rogers))
      Haaland, Wissa, Jackson

  13. mcsteely
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Opinions on squad structure please.

    Got a strong front 8 on WC. Is it worth getting a decent 5th mid, like Rogers, even though that means you’ll have benching dilemmas every week, or - downgrade 5th mid to a 4.5 to avoid benching dilemmas and use the extra 0.7 to upgrade elsewhere

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      For the busy holiday period you want 8 playing attackers. There is random benchings etc so the Rogers-type player will prove their value.

    2. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      That's a matter of style, no right or wrong answers there. I'm always keen on playing it safe and having a good bench, but a riskier approach could work, too.

      1. mcsteely
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Thanks all, I think that sums it up nicely, and I'm still undecided

  14. Super John McGinn-
    • 13 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Time to finally ditch Haaland?

    Raya,
    Gabriel, RAN, Pinnock
    Palmer (C), Foden, Mbeumo, Semenyo, Rogers
    Haaland, Larsen

    Fabianski, Solanke, Lewis, Greaves

    2 FT 1.1 ITB

    A) Lewis + Foden + Solanke > Hall/Kerkez + Salah (C) + JPedro (-4)
    B) Foden + Haaland > Salah + Isak
    C) Semenyo + Foden + Haaland > Salah + Saka + Jackson (-4)
    D) Raya + Foden + Solanke > Sanchez + Salah + JPedro (-4)
    E) Other

    1. PartyTime
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Keep Haaland. Probably D from those options although Foden could easily haul vs Spurs, Salah is still important.

      If I had the team I would most likely bank ft this gw or Rogers to Emile.

    2. The Tonberry
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      B

    3. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      B.

    4. Botman and Robben
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      B

  15. PartyTime
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Picked only 2.
    Emile, Semenyo in my team. Absolutely loving it! Rogers is a boring pick imo, hardly an exciting option.

  16. Milk, 1 Šuker
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    To wildcard or not to wildcard (in GW12)? That is the question I'm faced with

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      How's the season going thus far for you? 11 GWs enough to form some opinions.

    2. WiredWeasel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Didn't feel I had much of a choice - already on a four point hit and facing 1 red flag, two amber and three yellows! Appreciate the yellows often resolve themselves and the player in question does play at some point in the match, but still! So pressed the button to avoid the very real prospect of not being able to put a full team out/having a handful of cameo appearances.

    3. STHH
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I think now is a great time. Depends on a lot but if you have a couple of transfers in the bank too then they'll carry forwards.

  17. Tonyawesome69
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    For me, Rogers is the ideal 8th attacker assuming PP is 5.0m.

    With 343 more favourable setup, difficult to start one of ESR/Semenyo (8th attacker) over the forwards. Prefer the saving to be used elsewhere.

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      It's who I have kept because of the lower 5.0m cost. He may not be as good Semenyo or ESR (remains to be seen) but he's close enough with the saving in cash.

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Nailed number 10 for a Champions League side and playing Palace, Brentford and Southampton at home in his next 4 - agree it doesn't make sense to look elsewhere if you got on him at 5m.

  18. Gubby-Allen
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Has anyone not had a player miss a game yet?

    I have not had my first sub used once this season.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Those injuries during IB are not all "international injuries"...

      GW4:
      ESR 7 pointer auto sub for Pedro (injured during IB)

      GW8:
      Semenyo 2 pointer auto sub for Saka (injured during IB)

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        In fairness, Pedro and Saka got injured when playing for their country rather than pulled out at the start of IB

  19. El Presidente
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    All of them + Salah + Palmer. With Haaland and Watkins up top. Simple.

    1. Waylander
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Disagree on Watkins but the rest is one of several viable strategies.

    2. STHH
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Did the maths on this and it's completely possible with Joao Pedro, £4.5m defenders and £9.5m on GKs. Very tempting!

      I'm on wildcard currently and have a perfectly reasonable team with no Haaland and a lot of money in the bank. I also have one draft with a midfield of Saka, Son, Palmer, Salah and Fernandes, alongside Pedro, Wood and Cunha up front... but £0.0 in the bank!

      1. space mercenary
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        For a cake and eat it team, I have gone Odegard over Saka, which allows Palmer, Salah, Fernandes with Haaland, Wissa and Raul up top. Konate, Lewis, Hall plus VDV,Greaves. Sanchez keeper. OK, Lewis may need shipping soon, but plenty of bargains at that price. We also have Evanilson as an option up top if needed.

        1. space mercenary
          • 6 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Sorry, VDV shoukd be VDB!

  20. One for All
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Flekken
    Taa, Gabriel, Lewis
    Semenyo, Son, Salah, Palmer, Mbeumo
    Raul, Cunha

    Vald, Wood, Aina, Greaves

    1FT 1.4 ITB

    Waiting for news on Taa.

    How does this plan look?
    Gw 13

    Taa> Konate
    Raul> Isak

    Gw 14

    Wood> Pedro/ Flekken out

    Gw 15

    Son> Saka

  21. Tonyawesome69
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    In isolation, Haaland feels like an easy hold this GW.

    - VDV likely still out with hammy injury
    - Romero been playing with an injury and aggravated further on international duty
    - Bentancur important in the midfield 3 and now suspended

    1. Tazah
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Forgot - spurs insist on playing high line and.... It's spurs

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Common knowledge, no need to include that info...

        1. Tazah
          • 7 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          well sorrr ryyyyy

    2. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Captaining Haaland could be a nice differential.

    3. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Saying that - they're City's bogey team and most are selling to captain Salah against that horrific Southampton side. Wouldn't bet against Haaland scoring obviously.

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I did say Haaland as a pick in isolation. Folks could afford both Haaland/Salah and go without Saka.

        Does Ange's Spurs record against City suggest bogey team?

        https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/ange-postecoglou/leistungsdatenDetail/trainer/11929/saison_id//verein_id//liga//wettbewerb_id//datum_zu//datum_ab//gegner_id/281/trainer_id//plus/1

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Probably as bogeyish as you can get for a team like City. I'd say we are too, but they still thump us quite often.

        2. FPL CC killed the game
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          I don't think Saka's really in the conversation that much, he's not the issue if you go Haaland/Salah, its that its very hard to afford Palmer.

          1. Tonyawesome69
            • 7 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            I don't agree, folks are looking at 3/4 of Haaland, Salah, Palmer and Saka. We have cheap attackers to enable this setup.

    4. FPL CC killed the game
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Haven't we had these sort of reasons to hold Haaland for weeks now? Played Southampton hold him. Played Wolves hold him. Played Brighton minus Lewis Dunk hold him and they have a similar high line to Spurs. Its getting into DCL territory now with the excuses. Obviously he's a much better player than DCL and he is at least scoring but he's also miles more expensive than anyone else and needs to be scoring more to justify it.

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        The decision making process to keep Haaland was good but unfortunately did not get the outcome imo.

      2. Studs Up
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        this

  22. PartyTime
    • 4 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    I've got the C on Haaland atm but if playing TC this gw. Who would you pick out of these options
    1. Salah vs Sou
    2. Haaland vs Spurs
    3. Palmer vs Lei

    Thanks

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Palmer I guess

    2. mookie
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I value the TC chip higher than the BB this season. It is likely there won't be many teams with a DGW and who's on our benches, Fabianski, 2 budget defenders and a 5,5m mid. I think it's more likely I get 15+ points from a captain that has a DGW than that bunch. I'll probably use the FH in a BGW, BB in a week when these no good cheapies have some decent fixtures and TC in a DGW.
      Won't use any chip before mystery chip is revealed.
      That said, not much between them imo. Go with your gut.

      1. PartyTime
        • 4 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Ideally, BB in a dgw & FH in a bgw. TC salah/Palmer now or in a dgw it seems since midfielders get extra pts for goals & CS. Forgot about the mystery chip 🙂

    3. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Salah is the safest and most reasonable choice as regular captain, but probably the last option for a triple captain, it's easier to imagine the other two going 15+ points.

  23. x.jim.x
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Who, in your opinion, are the top 5 current strikers in the Prem?

    1. Haaland
    2. Watkins
    3. Isak
    4. Jackson
    5. Solanke

    It's actually quite depressing when you see it written out like that actually isn't it.

    1. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      You mean in terms of actual football, not as FPL assets, right?

      1. x.jim.x
        • 11 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Yeah actual football

        1. Captain Mal
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 1 month ago

          For me Haaland is clear number 1 and Isak is clear number 2.
          Jackson has improved his finishing, needs to work on his decision making, too.
          Nunez is another one with high potential, but needs to do more or he will become a lost cause.
          Wood is boring, but highly effective. Credit where credit is due.
          Pedro looks extremely promising, but I have to watch him more.
          Cunha is easy on the eyes, very enjoyable player, but maybe unfair to compare him with lone strikers.
          Same with Havertz.
          Watkins doesn't look sharp nowadays, a bit of a let down.
          Solanke never clicked for me, not a fan.

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            Watkins just needs a rest I think, but he's at least on par with Isak in my opinion, and that's a clear top 3. Spots 4 and 5 are just a 'best of the rest' which is pretty tragic for the best league in the world.

            Even just 5 years ago you had the likes of Kane, Aguero, Aubameyang, Vardy, Lacazette and Lukaku knocking about. Danny Ings scored 22 league goals ffs.

    2. Batman1983
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Isak
      Haaland
      Watkins
      Wood
      Nunez

  24. Nunezdagoat
    • 3 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    How's this WC squad? Have 2m spare + 1FT carried over.

    Sanchez
    Gabriel Konate Hall
    Salah (C) Palmer Bruno Mbuemo Rogers
    Isak Cunha J.Pedro
    (Fabianski, Rogers, Robinson, Altnouri)

    Thanks

  25. AD105
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Who is the priority to bring in?

    A) Jackson
    B) Isak

    1. Drizzle
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      It's close. Isak better form, good medium term fixtures, pretty safe minutes.

      Jackson 0.5m cheaper, better longterm fixtures, great numbers (unsustainable?) - but 4 yellows and more chance of rotation. Plus if you already have Palmer, not as desirable.

      Both are good picks.

  26. dhamphiir
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    An independent Regulatory Commission has imposed a seven-match suspension and £100,000 fine on Rodrigo Bentancur for a breach of FA Rule E3 in relation to a media interview.

    https://www.thefa.com/news/2024/nov/18/rodrigo-bentancur-sanctioned-181124

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Still don't understand how Enzo got away with arguably worse

  27. Howe-way the lads
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Who would you bench from this front lot, providing all fit to play of course as Semenyo & Mbeumo both flagged

    Salah (SOU A) Bruno (IPS A) Rogers (CRY H) Semenyo (BHA H) Mbeumo (EVE A)
    Isak (WHU H) Raul (WOL H) Haaland (TOTH)

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Rogers I guess

    2. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Mbeumo for me, Brentford away from home are terrible, your only bet is he is on penalties, but that's also a distant possibility based on how they are playing.

  28. Holmes
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    0.5 short of quad core team...

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Andersen is 4.3, interesting

  29. Drizzle
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    A week in to the IB and I still haven't decided to do the Haaland/Salah swap. Genuinely think Haaland could do well this week, and if I cash in on Trent I could still get a very nice balanced-looking team with Haaland. But I know Salah is killing it this season and that damn Southampton fixture could destroy my rank if I don't make the jump.

    There's no point in giving it another week too, as I'd miss the Sou/WHU fixtures for Salah & Isak. So it's now or never.

    Aaargh.

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I'm doing it, feel like Haaland needs to be perma-cap and score 2 goals a week to be worth it now.

      We get another wildcard in 6 weeks to reverse it if he starts banging again (which he very may well do until De Bruyne gets injured again)

      1. Drizzle
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 2 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        It's a fair point although I'm unlikely to want to wildcard so early. Just feels season-defining this choice.

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          His best run starts just before January actually - Everton, Leicester, West Ham, Brentford, Ipswich. That's across 3 weeks and Champions League starts again after that, so Pep might do some favours and rest him.

    2. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      It's a close call, no one can tell for sure.
      As a fellow Haaland, non-Salah owner, I didn't spend much time thinking about it, I'll captain Haaland and hope for the best.
      Watching Haaland terrifies me more than watching Salah, I'd rather have Salah ruin my season than Haaland.

      1. Drizzle
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 2 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I'm slightly leaning towards agreeing with you. Feel the narratives (and points) have been skewed so much by luck in the last 2 gameweeks. Even though City have been poor, Haaland could easily have got 10+ more points and then it feels like a different choice.

        Only issue is that Salah gets more points from a goal and assist than Haaland with 2 goals.

  30. Cabellafan
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Maz a better pick than Konate? 5.4 is a lot for likely just CS potential.

    1. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      United defenders are a shot in the dark right now, I'd rather wait a while before jumping onto them.

    2. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      When CSs are scarce, 5.4 isnt lot.