90 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. _Greg
    • 15 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    I do enjoy the FA Cup how the pieces come together for fantasy but...it's just not as good as watching that number go up!

  2. Holmes
    • 12 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Lets hope for Chelsea defeating Brighton tonight

    1. _Greg
      • 15 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I'd rather have more blanks in 34, so I reverse that sentiment.

  3. mdm
    • 13 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Who to bench?

    A. Semenyo (sou)
    B. Mateta (EVE)
    C. Isak (mci)

    Thanks.

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      BB time, Isak if any

      1. The Knights Template
        • 12 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        I reverse that sentiment and say Mateta. Huzzah!

    2. PartyTime
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      C

    3. Kingy109
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Tough call and I assume you want to bench your other attackers even less. For me, Srmenyo but only due to lack of penalties.

  4. RamaJama
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Are you playing FH in GW29

    1. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Trying not to.
      You?

      1. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Also trying to save it for bgw 34. Have 8 right now with a game in BGW 29, but will probably get Watkins for my FT if not injured. So 7

        1. The 12th Man
          • 12 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          I’m thinking about Wood > Watkins for a -4.

          1. RamaJama
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            Also have Wood, but considering Isak to Watkins for free and maby Slot or Emery AM for free.

    2. Conners
      • 7 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      No. I already have 9 and will add a couple more.

    3. Kingy109
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      No.
      If think free hit 29 is going to be something like:
      Sels
      Gvardiol Kerkez Aina
      Mbeumo Foden Kluivert Dango
      Wood Cunha Haaland

      I can get Forest and Bournemouth defence coverage and a similar attack (albeit Foden or Haaland not both) with free transfers and hide Salah Isak and a defender on the bench for GW30 so I'm doing that.

  5. EL tridente
    • 8 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Pick 2 villa players for next GW
    A) Martinez
    B) Rogers
    C) Watkins
    D) Rashford

    1. John47
      • 2 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Watkins (if fit). Beyond that, not sure. Rogers’ recent returns have not been great (0,6,1,1,1 in last 5 game weeks). Perhaps look at Rashford in tomorrow’s FA Cup match.

    2. Kingy109
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Watkins and Rogers.
      3 clean sheets all season means don't trust any defensive option
      Rashford's minutes would strike me as hail Mary territory unless he's much much fitter than we suspect for someone who hasn't played in a few months
      Malen or Asensio might be better punts if you must.

  6. PartyTime
    • 4 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    No PL action today even though it feels like there is.

  7. Xtreme Nz.
    • 2 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Worth going - 4 to downgrade a player in order to trigger AssMan Chip (Emery)

    0FT .2itb
    Raya
    Gabriel Trent Digne
    Mbeumo Palmer Salah Kluivert
    Wood Isak Gakpo

    Bench - Fab Amad Mykolenko Robinson
    GW24 Salah TC,
    still in play AM,WC,BB,FHC

    Feedback welcome please

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I wouldn't, unless you think they genuinely have a chance of beating Liverpool. GW26 & 27 look quite underwhelming for AM I think, especially with no standout fixtures for underdog bonus. You do have a lot of chips left but could e.g. BB33 FH34 AM35-7 to include a DGW

      1. Xtreme Nz.
        • 2 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Good advise, much appreciated, kinda agree GW26/7 doesn’t look great or have any standouts.

        AV vs Ipswich banker & anything out of the pool game would be a bonus with Emery I guess.

    2. Conners
      • 7 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I was considering Emery AM but have gone off the idea.

      Partly due to the Liverpool fixture, and partly because of the lack of good options to switch to the following GW.

      I think I'll wait and go with Maresca for Sou/Lei in GW27 & 28, then switch to Pep, Espirito Santo or Pereira in gw29.

      1. Xtreme Nz.
        • 2 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Like TC, AM best used in a DGW tbh, best to wait for DGW announcements later in the season

        1. Conners
          • 7 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          I'd prefer not to have AM left in play post-WC.

          It not only complicates your chip strategy if you have BB and FH left to play, but it leaves a chunk of your budget unavailable assuming you WC in gw30 and use AM in the later gameweeks.

        2. AC/DC AFC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          You'll only have dgw33, followed by a blank in gw34 and then dgw36 with a slight possibility of 1 extra fixture moving into gw37 as I understand it.

          On double game weeks, it may be a case of not making perfect the enemy of good.

          1. Xtreme Nz.
            • 2 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            Thanks,
            Navigate BGW29
            WC30 or 31
            BB 33
            FHC34
            AM 35 or 36/37/38

  8. dansmith1985
    • 3 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Just Gordon to Kluivert here and G2G?

    Henderson
    Aina TAA Gabriel
    Salah Palmer Mbeumo Gordon
    Wood Gakpo Isak

    Fab Mykolenko Hall Choudhury

    1. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I think this will be my move.
      Yes, team looks great.

    2. RamaJama
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      So not getting any AVL-players?

  9. The 12th Man
    • 12 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Team as it stands with 1FT and 0.6m itb.

    Slot
    Pickford
    TAA,Robinson,Munoz
    Salah,Palmer,Mbeumo,Gordon,Rogers
    Isak,Wood

    Fabianski,Jimenez,Aina,Castagne

    Plan.
    Wk 25. Gordon,Wood > Kliuvert,Watkins -4
    Wk 26. Slot > Arteta
    Wk 27-28 Save FT’s
    Wk 29. TAA,Rogers,Watkins > Gvardiol,Foden,Wood/Cunha for free
    Giving me :-
    Pickford
    Gvardiol,Aina,Robinson,Castagne
    Palmer,Mbuemo,Kliuvert,Foden
    Jimenez,Wood/Cunha

    Fabianski,Salah,Isak,Munoz

    Enabling me to avoid the FH in 29.
    The question is. Bringing in Watkins now costs me 2 FT’s. Is it really worth it?

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I would probably go for it if I could afford Wood - Watkins and still field 11 in 29 for -4, assuming he's fit of course

    2. Shark Team
      • 8 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I think Liverpool will score at least 2 vs City and won’t lose. I actually think they will win.
      Slot between 5 to 9 pts in this gw, I wouldn’t sell for Arteta

      1. The 12th Man
        • 12 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Yeh that crossed my mind too.
        Not making a move there would give me a little bit more flexibility, having a spare FT through 29.

    3. Conners
      • 7 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Looks good, but I think I'd give the Wood-Watkins hokey cokey a miss and save yourself the transfers (& hit).

      1. RamaJama
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Isak to Watkins instead?

        1. Conners
          • 7 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          I'm not keen on that either.

    4. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      My mind will be made up for me. Albeit one extreme to another.
      No FT's, TAA could be injured, 3 Pool.
      Option 1. Sell TAA and put Slot in for Moyes. -4
      Option 2 Sell Moyes and get Emery.
      Option 3 Sell Gapko if TAA fit and get Slot. -4

      There are a multitude of options on the players to tfr in and the AM chip will have a big swing (Overrated though as 3 Pool could outperform Slot with Emery)

  10. Shark Team
    • 8 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    I think if your team can support it the best thing to do is to go into gw30/31 where DGWs will be announced with at least:
    WC
    BB
    FH
    4+ FTs available
    This will make you maximise points potential for the end of the season
    The only thing you have to do is try to field 11 players in 29 by using max 2 transfers from now till then

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Hardly anyone will have 4+ FTs the week after deadending a BGW

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Apart from using the FH chip. Putting dross in GW 29 could hurt as the fixtures available are not that great.

    2. Kingy109
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      If you are wild carding 30 to 32 and have FH34 you don't need those transfers and they are better spent getting points now and in BGW29

  11. AC/DC AFC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    If you don't want to play AM into dgw25 it probably makes sense to forget a double and look at a good run of single game weeks for table bonus.

    Brentford from gw30 offers that for the team bonus.

    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      That extra fixture is a roll of the dice with a swing of 30pts

    2. Conners
      • 7 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      GW30 is prime WC territory, that's the issue.

      I also think the table-bonus is overrated. The team in question is 5+ places below the other for a good reason.

      I'd rather cherry-pick 3 plum fixtures and go for easy wins, clean sheets points and goal points.

    3. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Maybe if you still have TC & BB, but AM is probably the more powerful chip & I'm not even sure if there's going to be any DGW big enough to have close to 15 doublers

      1. PartyTime
        • 4 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        IMO, BB is the most powerful chip if it is perfectly unleashed. WC prior to get 15 DGW players will definitely hurt those without the chip unlike TC, AM. These chips are unpredictable. It is easy to make a mistake with them in contrast with BB in a DGW. It hardly fails.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          In past seasons, perhaps, if you really nail it. With the changes to blanks & doubles this season, I'm not so sure. If the blanks from 34 end up split across 33/6, or a lot of PL teams get knocked out, they'll all be too small for BB to be much more powerful than in a single GW

    4. PartyTime
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Unwise not to use it in a DGW because TB is quite overrated.

  12. chaser123
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Which blankers would you keep through GW29?

    1) Isak (1.1 transfer value gained)
    2) Salah (1.0 transfer value gained)
    3) Munoz (0.1 transfer value gained)
    4) TAA (0.5 transfer value gained)
    5) Rogers (0.6 transfer value gained)

    Rogers is an obvious sell post DGW. But I need at least one more to get 11 out…

    I could just sell Munoz for a Bournemouth/Forest defender but that would leave me with a super expensive bench that week which feels like a bit of a waste!

    Reason I’m thinking ahead as this might help with the Isak to Watkins move this week…

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Keeping Salah/Isak, losing Rogers & Gakpo. Want at least 1 player on the bench (prob a def) for a deadended team going into 29.

    2. Kingy109
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Isak and Salah
      Then either Trent or Munoz. Prob Munoz as Trent is too much money on the bench which you might need for Foden Harland Gvardiol or whatever
      Rogers with 8 yellows and uninspiring fixtures is a sell before GW29 I think, unlike the others you could just not buy him back and bank the increase for other assets (Bournemouth etc.)

    3. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      TAA can go as well I think.

    4. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      If TV is your main criteria then I think you've answered your own question. You haven't indicated what sort of lineup you'd have in 29, but I guess the question is whether you think e.g. Haaland (C) is worth enough points to offset 0.5m lost on Salah/Isak

      1. FPL CC killed the game
        • 11 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        You need to take a defender with you or you'll be playing 5 atb in GW29

        1. FPL CC killed the game
          • 11 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          Assuming you're taking 3 through 29 and no benching 29 that is about the 5atb. Munoz and Rogers are very easy to replace at their prices. Trent would free up some cash if needed.

          1. The Mentaculus
            • 4 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            Mentions selling Rogers & no other mids/fwds listed so I was assuming 4 atb, which I expect will be quite common

      2. Ryan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        That is the bold play. It’s not a simple thing to just sell Isak and Salah.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          For sure, I'm still undecided if I'm going to do that. Maybe some can afford it by only selling one of Isak/Salah, or 1+ Palmer instead

          1. Ryan
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            Palmer could be the drop if he doesn’t start returning soon

            1. The Mentaculus
              • 4 Years
              10 months, 17 days ago

              Agreed I'm more likely to do that. Feel like I have to keep for LEI/SOU but I might not even have Palmer on WC (30 probably)

  13. Merlin the Wraith
    • 9 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Any one else feel like we're having to endure the deluxe 4 day box-set of 'Injury-watch' before getting to watch the 'main feature' on Weds? :-/

  14. Ryan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Right, I think it’s a simple strategy with the info we have now.

    WC32 BB33 FH34 TC36

    On the Slot AM already.

    Any glaring weaknesses?

    1. lilmessipran
      • 13 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      What are the pros/cons of playing the wildcard in 30 vs 31 vs 32?

      1. Ryan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Closer to the BB means a more accurate BB team. Can carry a few FTs going into it just in case

        1. lilmessipran
          • 13 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          Fair.. but if you are using FTs to sell New and Pool players for gw29 you could be missing out on juicy fixtures for both in 30 and 31.

          1. Ryan
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            You dont have to sell those players necessarily

            1. lilmessipran
              • 13 Years
              10 months, 17 days ago

              I think it is a trade off either way which needs to be analyzed closely.

          2. Cold Palms
            • 1 Year
            10 months, 17 days ago

            You don't sell players on FH you drop them for one game week

            1. lilmessipran
              • 13 Years
              10 months, 17 days ago

              I don't follow ..surely FH gets used in 34 and not 29 for most people atleast.

              1. Merlin the Wraith
                • 9 Years
                10 months, 17 days ago

                That's my plan (injuries withstanding)

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      I think TC36 is the weak point / biggest gamble. If Liverpool get a DGW it's ARS immediately after UCL SF L2, and they might have won the league & potentially rest Salah for the 2nd game (TOT), so it's not even comparable to the TC opportunities right now. Also means Arsenal players aren't that appealing, and Newcastle play Chelsea. I guess you'd really be hoping City make the FA Cup SF & end up with sou AVL, which would be pretty juicy

      1. theplayer
        • 12 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Newcastle being at home to Chelsea I'd argue is a good fixture for Isak. But yeh City having a DGW would make Haaland the standout choice probably.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          Oh yeah it'd be IPS CHE for Isak, that's actually not bad at all. Was thinking about it in terms of TC Palmer initially but not sure why when Isak looks the better option at the mo

    3. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      FH29 could be a better differential as everyone is seeking to compromise transfers in the run up gw25-29.

      Also get to play into Man City at home to BHA.

      TC33 and BB36 perhaps.

      Means doing your best around blank34 and using your wildcard accordingly, likely in gw35 but that seems too late on.

  15. FCSB
    • 9 Years
    10 months, 17 days ago

    Those with AM, when you using it?

    1. Cold Palms
      • 1 Year
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Now

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Probably 35-7

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        What's the thinking there?

        Other than saving it for Wolves, Leicester or Everton for a relegation escape I don't see the logic or fixtures in the final 3 weekends.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          It's not really that set; could do it around 33 if there's some DGW fixtures I like there. Wolves v BHA is on the shortlist though, and I don't mind the idea of backing some of the relegation battlers if they find form (e.g. Ipswich v BRE). And I just feel like there's almost always some surprising bursts of form (or lack of) around that time given that only some teams have anything left to play for

          1. AC/DC AFC
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            I think with Premier League prize money and Europa etc most teams keep playing.

            The beach effect is getting smaller each year.

      2. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        Brighton?

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          I've completely lost faith in Hurzeler tbh. Not buying any Brighton players or backing them in any way

    3. lilmessipran
      • 13 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      If not on it right now around Dgw 36 would be the best opportunity.. least preferable option would be gw31-33 as you would miss out on bb33 in that case.

      1. Silecro
        • 8 Years
        10 months, 17 days ago

        You can always do AM31-33 and BB36. Whats wrong with that?

        1. lilmessipran
          • 13 Years
          10 months, 17 days ago

          36 will be a small double as compared to 34

          1. lilmessipran
            • 13 Years
            10 months, 17 days ago

            33*

    4. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Happily splaffed it this gw, with gamble of L'pool doubling 24/25 paying off.

    5. Free Hat
      • 6 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      Really have no idea. Especially with 3 liverpool slots taken.

      Villa looks ok for 25, but no appeal in 26 or 27.
      Thinking of holding for later gws, double or even single gws.

    6. Silecro
      • 8 Years
      10 months, 17 days ago

      GW33 or 36. And using BB in the other one, simple