634x258 Miscellaneous
4 August 2014 115 comments
Simply Loveleh Simply Loveleh
Share:

This is my ninth season of Fantasy Premier League and my first as a Fantasy Football Scout member and after all these year’s and experience I still don’t know what the best formation to use is. Most of the time I opt for  the obvious 3-4-3, or the ever-tempting 3-5-2. And then it came to me, if I can back up my thoughts with hard numbers, why not go 4-4-2 or even more daring and go 4-5-1. The point of this, my first article, isn’t to convince you to change formation tactic, but to share why after half an hour with a calculator I changed to 4-5-1, and why it is my best selection so far.

As we all know, defenders and keepers offer great value, but value can only be achieved if you pick actual point-scorers, this year, Wisdom seems great value, but he has to play, and then keep some clean sheets, I’m not so sure and very happy to see the back of him from my team.

I took the top eight point-scorers of last season from each position, and when you look at it, there aren’t too many surprises, for example in defence, Fonte aside, the other seven are all as expected, two Everton, three Chelsea and two Arsenal. The same goes for the midfield and striking choices.

Please note for the top eight strikers, I don’t have the Suarez figures, which could affect the results significantly, but the eighth best striker is Aguero, who is a good choice as he missed a lot of game time last year and he has a high points-per-game value.

So I took the top eight scorers and simply got the average points for each position: defenders 161, midfielders 178 and strikers 174, so as you can see at first glance, not a major difference between the three positions.

However, we all know that last season’s strikers were injured a lot, so I then looked at the minutes played by these top eight guys. They averaged 33 games, 28.5 games and 26.5 games respectively, so now we know the strikers are getting more points per game: 4.8 (defenders), 6.2 (midfielders) and 6.6 (strikers) per game – nothing too exciting there.

Defenders need an extra seven games to get fewer points, so for those extra seven games at six points each you can get an extra 40 points, but I would say out of those seven games, we don’t know about half of them in advance as rest and rotation hits you hard, so in reality, it could be four games and only an extra 25 points gained.

Now here is the interesting bit – I didn’t know what to do with that data. If my strikers play 30 games instead of 26 they will score 200 points instead of 160, so I then got the top eight game time players and found that the top eight defenders average 36.5 games a year, midfielders 35.7 and strikers 29.9. This shows clearly that strikers just don’t play a full season.  So, unless you can find a Suarez who bucks the trend, stock up on midfielders. They play a full season and average six points per game, and then stock up on defence. All you have to do is pick a top-eight point-scorer to be in with a chance.

So this season, my Suarez is Robin van Persie, and that’s it, I’ve gone 451, it allows me to get five big guns in my team and have a strong defence. With two weeks to go my team looks like this.

Foster – Smalling, Baines, Taylor, Davies – Fabregas, Sigurdson, Ramsey, Gerrard, Toure – RVP

As I said at the start of this article, I’m not trying to re-invent the wheel, just share that for the first time, I have convinced myself that I don’t have to play 3-4-3 and follow the template team – and if it doesn’t work, I always have my wildcard.

115 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Fascinating read...I'm not brave enough to switch from 3-4-3 but it certainly looks tempting to invest more in defence and midfield.

    Open Controls
  2. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Nice points. 🙂

    Open Controls
  3. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Looks like an early wildcard coming up. 😉

    Open Controls
  4. Timon
    • 14 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    power 5 ?
    who can they be ?
    this ones mine
    Fabregas-Mata-Yaya-Sterling-Siggy

    Open Controls
  5. Pasqualinho
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    The formation known in years gone by as 'The J-Lo' I believe (big in the middle, nothing up top). We all know that the optimum formation will finish 3-4-3 - with the BPs not being significantly different this should prove to be the case again come the season's end. But with the dearth of 4.5 defensive options this year I think it might be the best strategy to deviate from 3-4-3 at the start and work towards it over the course of the season.

    Open Controls
  6. blank
    • 12 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    RvP is going to miss the first game against the Swans 😠who is your back up?

    Open Controls
    1. Fabreghastly
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      If he can afford RVP, anyone can be a place holder

      Open Controls
  7. Granville
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Who are your back up strikers?

    Open Controls
  8. ChampionoftheWorld
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    My challenge to this theory is:

    Forward players are more explosive. Forms and goals and assists. So you have not considered the "form" impact?

    If you invest in heavy forwards / mids, you have the option to follow bandwagons early and capitalize on good forms. This could allow you to achieve higher numbers than the "average" that you calculated.

    Thoughts?

    Open Controls
  9. Billy Gilmore
    • 13 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    You're forgetting captaincy, a massive factor in FPL.

    Open Controls
    1. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      There's a least 5 or 6 decent captain choices there BG.

      Open Controls
      1. Billy Gilmore
        • 13 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Yes, but only one of them is a striker and the captaincy negates a lot of the perceived poor value up front as they get the highest scores with the greatest consistency.

        Open Controls
    2. Fabreghastly
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      And TV. Sometimes you just have to ditch a high ownership player that everyone else is selling so you're TV doesn't go down the toilet

      Open Controls
      1. Marknlard
        • 16 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Highly owned players don't tend to crash, it's the sub 1% players that do.

        Open Controls
        1. Fabreghastly
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          Sorry don't agree with you there. Sub 1% are very unpredictable but a high ownership player that dissapoints early on, particularly when there is a Yaya/Ramsey bandwagon to get on, is a hot potato

          Open Controls
          1. Marknlard
            • 16 Years
            11 years, 4 months ago

            The stats will show it's the sub 1% players that crash more often.

            Open Controls
  10. Gnu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Great read SjrH, I'm firmly in the 3-5-2 camp for much the same reasoning but 4-5-1 does look tempting.
    p.s you never listed your bench!!

    Open Controls
  11. Reedy
    • 15 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Really like this approach. Good team you've picked, too.

    With top defenders coming in cheaper than top mids or strikers, it's not hard to see that you can squeeze more value out of your budget by shifting emphasis toward the back. But so few take this approach. I suppose it's exciting to load up on attacking prospects and watch the goals roll in - but this more defensive strategy is no worse way to gather in the points.

    And with more to spend per remaining attacking slot in your team, you can have better (albeit fewer) attacking options too.

    Open Controls
  12. Dark_Mata
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    You're not accounting for your bench and rotation with a good sub if someone is rested

    Open Controls
  13. Dušan Citizen
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    I would pick Aguero and strong 5 midfielders,but I guess he wont start games at the start of the season.

    Open Controls
    1. Fabreghastly
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      It's not an issue. You can have a different striker every week if you only need one

      Open Controls
  14. Marknlard
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Good read. The important thing for players missing gametime is that FPL is a game that has transfers - if your striker is injured, you can lose them. So you can take advantage of the stability in defence while transferring your strikers when necessary (a striker transfer is also more fun than a defender).

    Open Controls
    1. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Good point MnL, it might be better if he worked out his average score per game and extrapolated for a full season.

      The other thing I'd like to see him look at is value per free million spent on each position I.e. We have to spend a min of 4.0 per gk and def, 4.5 for mids and 4.5 for fwds leaving us a free budget of 36m or so to upgrade each position. This implies to get value for your free budget the equivalent of a 7m def scoring 170 points would be either a 7.5m fwd scoring 170 or a 10.5m fwd scoring 340.
      Obviously you have to take captaincy into consideration so you need at least two reliable capt choices who will likely not provide value and these don't necessarily have to be forwards as only a few years ago nobody would have dreamed of captaining a forward due to the high scoring peno taking options in the midfielder range

      Open Controls
      1. Marknlard
        • 16 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Yeah, I remember in the past that base prices was a bit of a thing on here, so a goalkeeper costing 4.5 was 0.5 above base and a 8.0 striker was 3.5 above base. Like you say, in your 100.0 budget, only 36.0 can actually be spent, the rest is a compulsory minimum.

        I think this is a good way of looking at whether you are getting value in positions. It makes RvP (8.0 above base) twice as expensive as Bony, Giroud, Adebayor, Dzeko, etc

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          Yeah I still use it when trying to pick players except for the capt picks which you know will not be good value but when you double the points they make sense.

          I also try and get at least two minimum cost playing players for the bench as if you are getting good value on your points per million then the more millions you have on the pitch the more points you should be getting.

          Open Controls
          1. Marknlard
            • 16 Years
            11 years, 4 months ago

            4.0 defenders not looking too hot this year. Presumably one or two will make themselves known.

            Open Controls
            1. Dino
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              11 years, 4 months ago

              Yeah my biggest gamble gw1 will probably be a punt on a 4m Def. I'm thinking wisdom currently but very unsure. There is a left wb at qpr yun that I'm watching too but I don't see him keeping his spot.

              Open Controls
            2. The Team Principal
              • 13 Years
              11 years, 4 months ago

              Alex Bruce is the only 4.0 choice for me just now.

              Open Controls
  15. gunnerloco
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Need quick help please! What do you think of this team?

    Guzan

    Shaw Vlaar Lovren Debuchy

    Lamela Sanchez Eriksen Sterling

    Costa Jovetic

    Subs: Mannone, Young, Cameron, Bojan

    Thanks a lot!

    Open Controls
    1. The Team Principal
      • 13 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Have your seen Aston Villa's fixtures through GW 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10. Ditch at least one Villa defender unless you are going to use your wildcard before then. I am not touching Villa players.

      Open Controls
  16. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    The article is all very good until you come to captaincy and the moving out of injury hit players by transfer throughout the season. I had Rooney, Sturridge, Lukaku, Aguero, Suarez, Giroud, and Adebayour last season, trying to pick form or swapping when injured.

    The mathematics of it all does not quite fit when you are considering game time.

    Sorry, but I fear it is a meaningless post.

    Open Controls
  17. applebonkers
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    451 omg omg omg. you're crazy!

    this is interesting, love anything which suggests there is life outside the norm. inviting a taboo in then after spending a bit of time with it realising it's not that bad afterall.

    i actually feel overall scores and points per game short-change defenders if anything. this is because when a defender has a nightmare fixture whilst a striker or midfielder would get 2 points the defender can be down at 1 or 0. additionally the striker or midfielder may still nick a goal or assist. so the defender is getting more scores below 2. if however you are cuter with the defenders in when you buy them, or simply open to benching them regardless of cost, then you can probably rack up some serious points per game averages with the bonus change last season (still to be seen how favourable they will be this time around).
    so yeah that's the 4 man defence part of your 451 though. OMG 4 IN DEFENCE!

    even then sidestepping the numbers in midfield the sheer number and quality of mids from yaya down to eriksen and lamela @ 8.0 is disgustingly appealing. the 9.0 offering particularly interesting. 352 seems to be catching on in the site, i love this twist as i went back 4 and 5 a lot last season. the bit i think you'll find very hard to sell though is the 1 striker. of course you don't necessarily need to sell it, if it makes sense for you that's all that matters.

    if anyone calls this parking the bus tell them you are actually driving the bus, like a boss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B79sGmFSp9s#t=4s

    Open Controls
    1. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Love the vid ab

      What's your thoughts on the new bonus system?

      I am seriously considering something like what this article advocates but more of a flexible 442/343 with my Def being 4.5,4.0, 6.5, 6.5, 6.0 mids 9.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 4.5 fwds 10.5 8.5 6.0. It really does rely on def still getting mega bonus hauls though.

      Open Controls
  18. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    3 4 3 or 3 5 2 is the best option for me. I always consider a defender as cover for a defender and hope 2 out of 3 don't get game time that week. Therefore an absolute to have a 4 mil defender and a 4.5 mil defender.

    I have a rotating pair of midfield come attackers like Long and Puncheon in my case. The rest have to be mid or high priced nailed on players.

    there will always be luck in this game but I bet in the top 100 000 less than 5% had a 4 5 1 formation unless forced upon by injuries or double game weeks.

    I would like to see the algorithm those university boffins made and what formation they used.

    Open Controls
    1. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Thing is, there will probably be less than 5% 4-5-1s in the bottom 100,000 too. It's just a lot less popular (there may be good reason for that; but I haven't seen a convincing argument yet as to why it couldn't win FPL).

      Open Controls
      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        No. They will be late starters or early exits from the game. the only time it looked a good idea for 4 5 1 was at the beginning of the season when there was a shortage of goals. It soon righted itself.

        Open Controls
        1. Reedy
          • 15 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          I'm pretty sure that one of the teams in the top three last season was routinely playing four at the back. Of course that could always be an anomaly; I agree that the stats for this would be really interesting (but difficult to ascertain, especially as managers hop form one formation to another during the season).

          Open Controls
          1. Eze Really?
            • 11 Years
            11 years, 4 months ago

            As I said it would be nice to see FPL stats on the formations gameweek point for the top 100. Even if they changed it around just add them up and see what the numbers come up with.

            Anybody out there has the info and willing to do the work?

            Open Controls
            1. Reedy
              • 15 Years
              11 years, 4 months ago

              I posted this to the main site - it's only the top two teams though:

              http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comment/7744586

              Open Controls
              1. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                11 years, 4 months ago

                Great little post, deserved a hulk imo

                Open Controls
  19. Water_Pink
    • 15 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    ok i dont usally do this but here is my team.

    sheimeichel/ krul

    vlaar/ o'shea/ chester/ cameron/ wisdom

    cesc/ yaya/ sanchez/ herrera/ albrighton

    bojan/ costa/ rooney

    Open Controls
  20. Muffinz
    • 12 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Very tempting! However, when actually playing around with it, I'm not so sure.. My original team had a bench of 4,5 mid, 4,5 def, 4,0 def., now I'd have 6,0 fwd, 4,5 def, 4,5 fwd. That's 2 mill I could spend elsewhere. And frankly I think my original setup of Costa, Dzeko, Ward would still get more points than Sanchez, Luis, Evans which the new team gives me.
    Maybe I just haven't tinkered enough with it 🙂

    Open Controls
  21. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    I would love to see the analysis of the top 100 performers with formations and total points scored over the season defence mid and attack.

    When my bootie started building up I moved to more pricy defenders as I had Coleman at 5 mil to start. I looked at my starting team and had only 2 players throughout. The other being YA YA.

    I came 84 000th which isn't good but that was my gambling instinct going haywire. I spent 120 pts on multi transfers, I chased the price increases which din't always work by changing teams early. I took a couple of punts on players without proven track records like Tadic and Sanchez this time which also didn't work.

    If you start off badly, it is so hard to catch up because teams with more value do better in general.

    Open Controls
    1. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      This is completely the wrong attitude. If you start off badly taking hits for value and wagon chasing and don't change your tactics ofc you will continue to do badly.

      Maybe look at not chasing value but just pick players on form and fixtures then you should easily get top 10k. I was 320k or so in gw22 last year and ended up 3k or so with very little valuable chasing. I did have to change my tactics however and go for a max two big hitter midfield with normally only one big hitter and play 433 most weeks rotating mid priced mids like Nolan Puncheon aj eriksen and Ramsey and having a top heavy Def did the business for me.

      Open Controls
      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGeniusâ…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        You went 433 second half, eh? Interesting ... 🙂

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          I think it will be 442/343 sort of flexi formation this time round as I can't get away from the value in the 9m mids but if I can find a reason to downgrade rambo or mata I'll gladly upgrade 4.5m mid to Puncheon/arnie or another medium priced mid to rotate with siggy

          Key thing for me is have two good cap options and then look for value elsewhere

          Open Controls
  22. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    This is great stuff for the Dead Team League, but in reality if a striker gets injured you can just transfer him out for another one. All that matters is the ppg and you've just prooved that strikers have the highest ppg.

    Open Controls
    1. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      That's a very valid point. I still think he's on to something but I think it's more to do with the player pool we have to work with this season. I didn't set up 4 at the back last season or the season before, but this year it looks quite viable...at least to start with until we see who the best striker options are.

      Open Controls
    2. Zep
      • 15 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      I was just thinking this, perhaps someone might trial it for the Dead Team Challenge... 😉

      Would require having the right striker and him not getting injured all season though...

      Open Controls
    3. tm245
      • 14 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Was just going to post the same after reading it.

      Open Controls
  23. rakkhi
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Not really sure you can use averages in this way. This doesn't work unless you happen to guess the top scorers in defence and midfield for the whole season at the start of the season. With transfers you are likely to make sub optimal plays (considered in hindsight of the full season). As others mentioned it also misses captaincy. While it is tempting to look at average PPG, this game is really about having the right players at the right times (and captaining them). I mean there is only 200-300 or so points between the world number one and top 10k. The difference is made up of having those firing players early and for the right period of time.

    Open Controls
    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Couldn't agree more. Glad we don't pay for the info!

      Open Controls
  24. blank
    • 12 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    >proves strikers have the highest ppg
    >plays only one

    flawless logic, mister.

    Open Controls
    1. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      And strikers have the lowest value, the logic is not as flawed as you may think

      Open Controls
  25. 3 years & counting
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    RMT please.

    Krul - Mannone
    Debuchy - B Davies - Lovren - Bruce - Wisdom
    Mata - Sigurdsson - Hazard - Eriksen - Albrighton
    Rooney - Dzeko - Diego Costa

    Planning to line up 3-4-3 with the occasional rotation depending on fixtures.

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Open Controls
    1. JasonG123
      • 12 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Which would you rather:

      (A) Costa and Eriksen

      (B) Dzeko and Hazard

      Cheers

      Open Controls
      1. DD DUBAI
        • 13 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Costa and eriksen for me

        Open Controls
    2. JasonG123
      • 12 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Shit sorry didn't mean to reply. Your team is well balanced but I think Albrighton should become another lesser owned 4.5m player since he will drop in price and not sure if Bruce and Wisdom will start.

      Open Controls
      1. 3 years & counting
        • 11 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Cheers mate.

        You got any alternative suggestions?

        Open Controls
      2. TheInsideMan
        • 11 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        How will he drop in price if guys keep him?

        Open Controls
  26. Pure Olivia
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Not silly at all. 4-5-1 is my default formation as I crunched the numbers many seasons ago.

    It does work, but it depends on the season ... I got Top 100 with it but it can go badly wrong.

    If the top strikers are in form then you just get obliterated.

    Open Controls
    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      You had a great season then. FPL has changed since. Time to adapt. 😉

      Open Controls
      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        It has changed since the 343 of two seasons ago too TM you need to move on too 😉

        Open Controls
  27. andyinasia
    • 12 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    I'm a believer in the article's hypothesis - I just think the squad he's picked could be better. In fact here's my 4-5-1 squad with Rooney the guy up top and nailed-on captain.

    What do you think?

    Gk Green 4.5 Gilks 4
    Def Luis 6 Azpili 6 Debuchy 5.5 Evans 5.5 Baird 4
    Mid Sanchez 10.5 Hazard 10 Mata 9 Sterling 8.5 Sigurdsson 6
    Str Rooney 10.5 Bojan 5.5 Barnes 4.5

    Open Controls
    1. blank
      • 12 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      you have two chelsea defenders that are directly competing from the game time against each other and your gks just plain suck.

      Open Controls
      1. andyinasia
        • 12 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        I'm expecting Azpi and Luis to be on opposite flanks.
        I downgraded Beggers which I regret, so I'll reinstate him if I can find 0.5.
        Could go for a 5.5 nailed-on defender - any suggestions?

        Open Controls
        1. Falcon
          • 16 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          Ignore the other guy......Luis is left footed and will replace Cole now at Roma with Azi on the right and Ivan filling in as the sub for any back line player not up to scratch

          Open Controls
    2. Panco55
      • 11 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Seeing how cheap your Strikeforce is, that defence and gk is horrible.

      Open Controls
      1. andyinasia
        • 12 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        Alright chaps,

        MK.2 - tweaks in the goalkeeping and defensive departments

        Gk Begovic 5 Gilks 4
        Def Azpili 6 Debuchy 5.5 Evans 5.5 Ward 5 Chambers 4.5
        Mid Sanchez 10.5 Hazard 10 Mata 9 Sterling 8.5 Sigurdsson 6
        Str Rooney 10.5 Bojan 5.5 Barnes 4.5

        Open Controls
        1. Panco55
          • 11 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          Midfield looks great. I'd suggest a different 4.5m defender than Chambers. I suppose he covers Debuchy if he plays but Arsenals opening fixtures aren't amazing.

          Begovic is a great choice.

          Open Controls
          1. andyinasia
            • 12 Years
            11 years, 4 months ago

            Thanks. Chambers is a short-term plug for the first 1 or 2 GWs while Merts is rested. There are plenty 4.5 defs in the mix to choose from once he's benched.

            Open Controls
  28. ★Brutal Deluxe★
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Why not got for a 3 3 4 which I have done and a 3 2 5 for GW2!

    GW1 Mannone---Simpson Evans Wisdom---Ramsey Yaya Henderson---Sterling Hazard Rooney Bojan
    GW2 Krul---Mariappa Evans Taylor---Ramsey Yaya---Sterling---Hazard---Rooney---Bojan---Pelle

    Open Controls
    1. blank
      • 12 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      wait, what?

      Open Controls
    2. Panco55
      • 11 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Your formations are 352 and 343.

      Bojan will disappoint; pretty much his whole professional career has been a disappointment.

      Midfield looks ok but Wisdom may not start in defence.

      Open Controls
      1. ★Brutal Deluxe★
        • 11 Years
        11 years, 4 months ago

        In Fantasy terms yes but how they line up for thier teams, I have picked 5 strikers, If I also swapped Yaya to Sanchez and Ramsey for Mata I would have 7 fwds in my team, some might say

        Sanchez Mata Hazard Bojan Pelle Sterling Rooney, that would give me 0.5 to play with too to upgrade Bojan maybe to Jelavic\Long

        Then my formation would be 3-0-7 haha

        Open Controls
        1. Panco55
          • 11 Years
          11 years, 4 months ago

          Ok I get what you mean. Tough decision between Long and Jelavic. I can't pick which one is the better option.

          Open Controls
          1. ★Brutal Deluxe★
            • 11 Years
            11 years, 4 months ago

            Do you think its a good idea to play 7 strikers lol? Ive never thought about it like this?

            Open Controls
            1. Panco55
              • 11 Years
              11 years, 4 months ago

              Generally it's a good idea to have as many attacking players as far up the pitch as possible.

              But, Ramsey and Toure showed last year that box to box mids are an option.

              I think Ramsey is a great option and having Mata and Rooney probably isn't ideal.

              Toure looks a better option to me than Sanchez atm but that could easily change. Having Toure also means you can draft Sanchez in easy if he hits form quickly.

              Open Controls
  29. boyler
    • 12 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    Any chance of a RMT ?
    DDG-Gilks
    B.Davies-Chester-Cameron-Cahill-Ward
    Faregas-mata-eriksen-Siggy-Ramsey
    Rooney-jovetic-bojan

    Open Controls
  30. beetheboy
    • 11 Years
    11 years, 4 months ago

    I agree with much of this article but I must be missing something here. The team that the author has picked still needs 4 players to make up the squad but only has 17 to do that with .... that only averages 4.25 to spend on each player!

    Open Controls
    1. Reedy
      • 15 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Yeah we need to see the bench really.

      Open Controls
    2. Simply Loveleh
      • 11 Years
      11 years, 4 months ago

      Gilks 4m, Baird 4m, Zamora 4.5, Barnes 4.5...all a load of crap, will average 1 ppg, wasn't worth mentioning as i believe everyone spends 17-18m on their bench

      Open Controls