381 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Watkins or Martinelli
    B) Pedro or Shaw

    Different formations, of course

    1. KieranKA
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Martinelli and Pedro, probably. Depends if you have Onana

      1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I don't have Onana

    2. N00B
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I think it's clear A

      1. N00B
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Oh. My bad. Martinelli and Pedro.

  2. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    When is tonight’s scoutcast?

    1. 1912 F.A Cup Winners
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I think(not 100 percent sure) that it was last night mate

      1. Dat Guy Welbz
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Oh

      1. Dat Guy Welbz
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thank you

  3. KieranKA
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A: 4-5-1, start Chilwell, bench Mubama
    B: 3-5-2, start João Pedro, bench Colwill

    Rest of the team is pretty template
    Onana // Aréola
    Stones Gabriel Estupiñán // __ Baldock
    Salah Rashford Saka Mitoma Mbeumo
    Haaland __ // Osula

    1. Jrot94
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I went 442 and got Wissa up front instead of one of the 6.5 MFs, Extra 0.5 allows for a 4.5 defender (I prefer a Villan to Colwill)

    2. Bobby Reds
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

    3. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

  4. Rasping Drive
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Can’t decide between:
    a) Mitoma Jackson
    b) Martinelli João Pedro

    Whadaya reckon, fellas?

    1. Drexl Spivey
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'm on all but Mitoma, so I suppose B.

      1. Rasping Drive
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers; True Romance, in my top 5 films of all time, a bona fide classic

    2. sirmorbach
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B for me

      1. Rasping Drive
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thank you

    3. Sun God Nika
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B for me
      Feels like Brighton goals will be shared a lot anyways

  5. Bounce
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    5 of Arsenal's first 6 fixtures are all in London, including GW 1-4. Could be a big advantage, but probably doesn't mean much in terms of FPL.

    1. el polako
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      ?

      1. Bounce
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        1. NFO (H) - London
        2. CRY (A) - London
        3. FUL (H) - London
        4. MUN (H) - London
        5. EVE (A)
        6. TOT (H) - London

        Only 1 game a week and barely any travelling.

        1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Travelling to Croydon will feel like going back in time 40 years

        2. lugs
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          oddly going off recent years, 5 is the hardest fixture for them

    2. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      You thinking they’ll avoid the jet lag if travelling up to Manchester or Newcastle?

      1. el polako
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        It's not the jet lag that's the problem.
        It's the cultural shock.

        1. Admiral Benson
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Good point

  6. sirmorbach
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Pickford + 4.5 def rotation (likely Botman/Cash) or Botman every week and Onana?

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Botman has such a low ceiling and those fixtures look like the odd goal leaked per game.

      £4.5m’s for me (Johnstone & Henry)

  7. Babit1967
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    So it all comes down to my Salah (442) vs non Salah team (352)

    Salah team

    Onana
    Chilwell Stones Estu Gabriel (Baldock)
    Salah Saka Eze Rashford (Chuk)
    Haaland Pedro (Mubama)

    Non Salah

    Onana
    Stones Estu Gabriel (Cash Baldock)
    Martinelli Bruno Saka Eze Rashford
    Haaland Watkins (Mubama)

    Which team would you go for ?

    1. hoya4life3381
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I have taken the Salah team and upgraded Pedro to Watkins by downgrading to a 4.5 goalie and swapping Stones for a 4.5 defender. Stones played straight center back in Community shield and city may not use him in the pivot now that Kovacic is here. I like Watkins more than Pedro and Martinelli over the long term but gamweek 1 isn’t as good.

      1. Babit1967
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        That’s a good shout mate

  8. Tellloth
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Martinelli + Watkins
    B) Salah + J. Pedro

    It's hard justifying not having 3x Arsenal for GWs 1-3...

  9. skywow
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Hey guys, what you think ? I'm struggling hard

    Pickford
    White - Mings - TAA - Stones
    Salah - Mitoma - Rashford - Martinelli
    Haaland - Vinicus

    And about these options too :
    A : Estupinan / Saka
    B : Stones / Martinelli
    C : Shaw / Martinelli

    Thanks !

    1. skywow
      • 2 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Any advice ?

  10. Oh Mane Mane
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Which 3 are better…

    A - Salah, Eze, Pedro

    B - Bruno, Martinelli, Watkins

    1. el polako
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I like B more but not necessarily with Bruno.

      1. Oh Mane Mane
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Who would you think instead of Bruno?

        1. el polako
          • 8 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Odegard, Saka, Maddison(if Kane stays), look at finding extra cash and go KDB or punt on one of LFC mids.

    2. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      C - Salah, Diaby, Pedro

    3. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

  11. Jaws
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    4.5 CHE def Lewis Hall on his way to Palace according to F. Romano. Final details being discussed. OOP defender.

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Great signing for Palace that. You think he will play midfield? I assumed LB?

      1. Jaws
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        He definitely can play in multiple positions. I expect him in midfield, Palace looks settled at the back. Unfortunately looks like the deal won’t be finalized before GW1. Keeping an eye on this.

  12. The Abyss
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Two questions. Who removes the comments from here, and do they just remove absolutely anything at all?!

    1. Tomerick
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No need to be sad Ken.

      1. The Abyss
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Just a bit frustrating when you go to all the time and effort to write up something for the good of others, only for it to be swiftly removed.

        1. CaTriEm
          • 12 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          I would assume it's automated and you'd be surprised at what can trigger it. I remember finding out many years ago that you couldn't mention Sc*nthorpe United.

          1. Tomerick
            • 11 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            Let’s hope they never make it to the dizzy heights of the EPL!

          2. The Abyss
            • 12 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            But the comment was posted and had replies before then being deleted.

            Shame for everyone as I basically explained how to win FPL.

        2. Tomerick
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          As a rule of thumb you want to copy any long post before submitting just in case. Very annoying though.

  13. rozzo
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Onana
    Chilwell Saliba Estupinan
    Saka Martinelli Rashford Bruno Mitoma
    Haaland Watkins

    Areola Kabore Baldock Mubama

    0.5 itb

    Estupinan or Stones?

    Estupinan more attacking but Brighton wont keep many clean sheets imo he's not a long term option just their first few games

    Stones has Burnley first match, not bad, City could revert to their formidable defence again this season

    Thoughts?

    1. Eyes of Blue
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Stones for me. Better longer term fixtures, (potentially) playing in midfield with freedom to get forward and if Ederson can learn how to save then he could rack up lots of CS’s.

    2. The Tinkerman
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Identical to mine bar Areola, Saliba > Turner, Gabriel.

  14. mdm
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Drop one:

    A. Stones
    B. Estu
    C. Chilwell

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

    2. ritzyd
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

  15. CaTriEm
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Flekken (Turner)
    Estup, Botman, TAA (Udogie, Baldock)
    Saka, Salah, Øde, Diaby (Anderson)
    Norwegian Death Robot, JPedro (4.5)

    0.5 itb, first RMT of the season. It's perfect, right?

    1. Dunster
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Playing 3-4-2 is a bold choice

      1. CaTriEm
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Ah, silly me. Defence should actually read

        Estup, Torres, TAA, Botman (Udogie)

        1. Dunster
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          I like the Torres pick in defence. Not sold on Botman from the start.

          I’m going the same route of using Pedro to have Salah - with a few differences (sticking to 3-5-2) - feels a bit punty but game is supposed to be fun right

  16. Eyes of Blue
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Any brave souls here captaining someone other than Haaland? I’m on Rashford currently - only Haaland scored more points at home than Rashford last season, and he’s playing Wolves who had one of the worst away records in the league.

    1. Eat my goal!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Same

    2. N00B
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I think we are a few on Saka

      1. Eyes of Blue
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Yep he’s also a good pick. Currently got the VC on him.

    3. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Good Pick, Wolves coach leaving too

      1. Eyes of Blue
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Damn didn’t see that! Makes me even more confident! 😀

    4. Jaws
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Without KDB feeding Haaland, I’ll probably go for Rashford or Saka as well. I expect KDB to start from GW3 or so and then Haaland becomes a different animal.

  17. tryf88
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Is template Salah or no Salah? A world of possibilities opens up without...

    1. RICICLE
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I’m going without, the compromise is just too much. With him in your squad, I feel it bottlenecks into the fact that he MUST perform, whereas without, I feel you then have more chances for other players to fetch the points and bring your score up.
      Team looks so much more balanced and poised without, even though I do Salah as an asset, he’s just too expensive for me.

    2. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'm going with him and here's my draft:

      Onana
      Chilwell / Estu / Gabriel
      Salah / Saka / Rashford / Mitoma / Diaby
      Haaland / Wissa

      Works a treat. My reasoning is it's easier to downgrade him in one move to anyone in midfield than it is for anyone else to have to do 2-3 moves to get to him if he starts the season on fire.

    3. Eyes of Blue
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      All depends on your strategy, but I’d go without myself. His early fixtures aren’t that great and other than GW2, you probably aren’t going to captain him that often early on. Better to just spread the money elsewhere imo.

  18. AnyoneButLiverpool
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Has Mark posted his team yet?

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Assuming it will be on Blackbox this Wednesday.

      Time of year when he usually goes against the template and spends the first few weeks at 6 million rank.

  19. The Tinkerman
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Wissa, Trent, Maddison
    B) Watkins, Gabriel, Martinelli

    1. Dat Guy Welbz
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B by far imo

    2. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      If Kane stays, I'd go B with Maddison over Martinelli

  20. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Taking early questions for my scoutcast appearance after I win FPL in the 2023/24 season.

    What questions would you like me to answer on it sometime in May?

    1. el polako
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      What are you on?
      Is it prescribed?
      Can I get contact details for your doctor?

    2. Moxon
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      How did you predict Ashley Young winning the golden boot?

    3. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      State of you

    4. Capocannonieri
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Question:

      Now that everybody has seen Haaland for a year, can we expect him to settle into more reasonable scoring levels. Like Kane? Is he actually worth 14M in 2023?

  21. Capocannonieri
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    How Dumb is This?

    Isak and Wilson will rotate. But Newcastle will play to win versus every team. Between these two, I will get 4,000 to 4,500 minutes.

    I can combine them for 15.5M and maybe get more goals and assists than Salah, Kane, and maybe Haaland.

    But should one get injured or Howe goes with just-1 primary Striker, I can always trade one out. Or if a fixture sucks, just play one. It's like getting a Haaland-A and Haaland-B.

    The bad side: You can't captain both like you can Haaland. Newcastle could suck. They take two positions on the 15 man roster. If Newcastle blanks, you lose two players.

    I also think Gapko and Darwin can be Salah alternatives. Rotators. But Darwin needs to show he can score and I need to know that Gapko is a center forward.

    1. ritzyd
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Overthinking for sure

    2. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Sorry, but don’t follow this at all. You’re saying you can get two players whose combined price exceeds that of the premiums and you hope that the pair combined might outscore the less expensive premium and you think this would somehow be advantageous?

    3. Critical Observer
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Very.

    4. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      “It's like getting a Haaland-A and Haaland-B.”

      Nope. It’s like getting two players who combined cost more than Haaland and are probably more likely to score less than him combined (though they might, together, come close to Haaland’s points). Each is probably more like half a Haaland.

    5. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Points from last season (PPM based on this season's pricing):

      Haaland - 36G 9A - 272 points (19.4 PPM)
      Kane - 30G 9A - 263 points (21 PPM)
      Salah - 19G 13A - 239 points (19.1 PPM)
      Wilson + Isak - 28G 8A - 257 points (16.6 PPM)

      That's not even taking into account the fact that you'd captain Haaland pretty much every week. To answer your question, this is really dumb.

      1. Capocannonieri
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Do the same analysis for last 10 games when NUFC had both healthy and playing.

        Also with this move , you can still get a choice of Kane, Salad, or Haaland.

        I+W is better than any premium. But not better than Haaland on PPM. But Haaland is Peppable in any easy match for UCL rest.

        1. CABAYE4
          • 14 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          We won’t start this season playing the same way as the end of last season.

          Can’t see Wilson & Isak starting any games together anytime soon. We’ve bought Barnes and Gordon to play LW.

        2. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          They literally aren’t better than any premium. You can’t look at “play together” stats only because that’s not what always happens. They’re both massively injury-prone and I doubt Howe will force Isak out wide with Barnes coming in.

          You’d be paying 15.5m to have 1 Newcastle striker the majority of the time, which is madness for a team who didn’t even score 70 goals last season.

      2. Bluetiger1
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        great stats- x.jim.x

    6. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I wondered something similar for Martenelli and Trossard but it doesn't work because you're taking up two spots for one, or spending budget and relying on a third, cheaper sub to come on in place of the no show.

      1. Bluetiger1
        • 3 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I was thinking on Trossard before the City game in the CS as preseason good but now uncertain

  22. lordkippe
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    First draft this season. Going to finalize my team tonight or tomorrow. Biggest question is Salah or not. Not completely sold on Jackson.and got 1.5 ITB. So what do yo guys think needs working on ?

    Pickford ( Virginia )

    Shaw - Gabriel - Estupinan (Chilwell, Beyer )

    Saka - Martinelli - Rashford - Maddison - Mitoma

    Haaland - Jackson (Mubama)

    1. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Nice team, might give it a copy

    2. WVA
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Salah

  23. Peter Haddock
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Hello everyone, hope you’re looking forward to the season! Should I downgrade Watkins to bolster midfield?

    Martinez / Areola

    Gabriel / Estu / Chilwell / Pau / Botman

    Salah / Eze / Saka / Mitoma / Anderson

    Haaland / Watkins / Wissa

    Thank you in advance ☺️

    1. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      7/10 looks good

    2. Old Bull
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Almost identical to mine. I’ve got Pickford instead of Martinez, Anderson instead of Estupinan, Martinelli for Mitoma and Pedro for Wissa. Think I’m gtg.

  24. hoya4life3381
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Best 4.5 Starting Defender? Player will start next to Chillwell Estupinan and Gabriel. Will be pairing with a Pickford or Johnstone.

  25. Bring the Cavalry
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    How much of a threat is Reguilon to Udogie for the left back position at spurs?

    Ange gets his fullbacks forward and inverted a lot, so been on Udogie for weeks until I remembered about Reguilon

    1. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No threat. Udogie is the most exciting player at Spurs at the moment.

    2. ritzyd
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Udogie looks perfect for Ange's playstyle. Reguilon and Sessegnon are threats to his position but seems his to lose at the moment.

    3. Bring the Cavalry
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers for the replies!

      With Ange style, Udogie should get a lot of attacking returns and baps

  26. revelc
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Gabriel or Saliba?

    1. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Gabriel for goal threat.

  27. x.jim.x
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Spurs without Kane, Maddison, Kulusevski, Romero, Son, Bentancur or Hojbjerg and dominating the Spanish champions.

    I know it's only pre-season but we might have to actually admit that they're sneaking top 4.

    1. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Haha good one

      1. x.jim.x
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I dunno, looks like they're actually trying to play football this season. It's a bold strategy, let's see how it works for them.

  28. Releasebreaks
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Rate this Team

    Onana
    Estu Gabriel Chillwell (Baldock Bell)
    Rashford Bruno Saka Eze (Anderson)
    Wilson Watkins Haaland

    1. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Prefer Kabore over Bell.
      Eze I'm still not sold on, he plays deeper when in possession/creator/set piece guy.
      Wilson a minutes risk.

    2. DRIZ ✅
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      6/10 missing Liv cover

  29. mr messi
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Best 4m defender, Baldock?

  30. The Abyss
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A) Up to 5mil defender + Kane

    or

    B) TAA + Saka

    ???

    1. Olof Mellberg
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A

      1. DRIZ ✅
        • 14 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Looks good

    2. antis0cial
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A, but would prob just go 5m def saka and change

      1. The Abyss
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks.