Chip Strategy
7 April 2026 80 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

For those Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers with the Wildcard still intact, when is the best time to use it?

In this article, we run through the pros and cons of playing the Wildcard in Gameweeks 32 and 35, the two most popular windows that remain.

GAMEWEEK 32 WILDCARD: THE PROS

Double Gameweek 33 Bench Boost

A Gameweek 32 Wildcard allows you to load up on Gameweek 33 ‘doublers’, with a Bench Boost in mind.

Bournemouth, Brighton and Hove Albion, Burnley, Chelsea, Leeds United and Manchester City are the six teams that play twice in Gameweek 33:

Therefore, you could potentially include 14 ‘doublers’ on your Wildcard, as well as the in-form Bruno Fernandes (£10.3m), who is very difficult to leave out given his Gameweek 32 fixture at home to Leeds.  

Although it’s not guaranteed, this approach puts you in a really strong position to rack up a big Double Gameweek 33 score, in turn propelling you up the rankings.

Neale has already looked at a few Gameweek 32 Wildcard drafts to consider in this piece here.

Get on Brighton early

Brighton have a superb Gameweek 32 fixture, away at Burnley, so it’s the perfect entry point for a triple-up.

We’ve already discussed the merits of a defensive triple-up here, with Jack Hinshelwood (£5.1m) and Danny Welbeck (£6.2m) alternatives further forward.

Like Brighton, Leeds also have some decent fixtures to target in Gameweeks 35 to 38 (BUR, tot, BHA, whu), so look decent bets for the run-in.

Stock up on Man City

FPL notes: Mixed fortunes for Haaland + Salah 2

Man City visit Chelsea in Gameweek 32, who have kept just one clean sheet in 15 Premier League matches.

They follow it up with a Double Gameweek 33, and remember, City will have another ‘double’ beyond that one, likely in Gameweek 36.

Erling Haaland (£14.4m), who many FPL managers have recently sold, will have plenty of interest after Saturday’s hat-trick against Liverpool, while Antoine Semenyo (£8.2m) is hard to look past in midfield.

Defensively, Nico O’Reilly (£5.0m) looks a threat regardless of position, as demonstrated by his FA Cup assist against the Reds.

Gameweek 34 Free Hit

After Bournemouth, Brighton, Burnley, Chelsea, Leeds and Man City ‘double’ in Gameweek 33, the same six teams then blank in Gameweek 34.

Gameweek 32 Wildcarders can subsequently Free Hit in Gameweek 34, allowing you to build an optimal squad for that specific round of fixtures.

Gameweek 34 fixtures, sorted by difficulty on our Season Ticker

The matchups admittedly don’t scream points, but it is, after all, part of a much bigger plan (which could include Triple Captain 36 if you still have it left), and probably shouldn’t be focused on in isolation.

GAMEWEEK 32 WILDCARD: THE CONS

Not great entry points

One of the ‘cons’ for playing a Gameweek 32 Wildcard is the fact that so many of the Gameweek 33 ‘doublers’ have poor entry points.

Bournemouth and Leeds are away at Arsenal and Manchester United respectively, for example.

Then there’s Man City and Chelsea, who play each other. You could feasibly have five or six of your starting XI involved in that fixture alone, which is far from ideal if there aren’t many goals.

So, the trade-off is clear: a weaker-looking XI this week, but lots of players with two fixtures in Gameweek 33.

No Arsenal players?

Arsenal not ‘doubling’ in Gameweek 33 has made it trickier for Gameweek 32 Wildcarders, as they have some great fixtures from now until the end of the season.

No Arsenal coverage could hurt in Gameweek 32, for example, when Mikel Arteta’s side are the bookies’ favourites to keep a clean sheet.

You could, of course, include Gabriel Magalhaes (£7.2m) in your Wildcard squad, who most managers will have value tied up in, but it isn’t ideal to maximise the Bench Boost chip in Gameweek 33, when Arsenal visit Man City.

Arsenal + Palace transfer focus in Gameweeks 35/36

Should you choose to exclude Arsenal players from your Wildcard, you will probably need to prioritise them in Gameweek 35, ideal for those with a few free transfers already banked.

But if you don’t fall into this category, it becomes a bit more complicated, especially considering that players from Crystal Palace may also need to be transferred in before their ‘double’.

Either way, it will give you less flexibility with transfers for the final few Gameweeks.

To help navigate this period, you could include someone like Ismaila Sarr (£6.3m) on your Gameweek 32 Wildcard. Bench Boosting a single Gameweek option isn’t ideal, but Palace do at least have West Ham United at home.


GAMEWEEK 35 WILDCARD: THE PROS

Keep Arsenal players + your Gameweek 32 team

One of the main advantages of a later Wildcard is that you can keep your Arsenal players.

The same applies to Man Utd and Liverpool assets, who both have favourable on-paper fixtures in Gameweek 32.

Gameweek 32 fixtures, sorted by difficulty on our Season Ticker

If you Wildcard this week, you’ll probably offload those aforementioned options because they don’t ‘double’ in Gameweek 33.

As a result, by holding off, your immediate points potential is likely higher.

Gameweek 33 Free Hit

FPL notes: Cherki stars, Dyche on Jesus + £4.0m ‘keeper starts again

A Gameweek 35 Wildcard could be preceded by a Gameweek 33 Free Hit, which would allow you to field a full team of ‘doublers’.

It means the Free Hit chip could be used a bit more aggressively, knowing that you don’t have to commit to these players for the remainder of the campaign.

It could open up a short-term punt on a Bournemouth attacker, or perhaps Man City’s Rayan Cherki (£6.3m).

If you do opt for a Gameweek 33 Free Hit/Gameweek 35 Wildcard approach, you can further differentiate this week with players like Matheus Cunha (£8.0m) and Jarrod Bowen (£7.6m), who enjoy decent home matches on either side.

Get ready for Palace’s Double Gameweek

A Gameweek 35 Wildcard allows you to triple-up on Crystal Palace assets, since they are expected to ‘double’ in Gameweek 36.

We’ll know if they are still in Europe by that point, which may influence our decisions on who to invest in.

Furthermore, you can target players from teams such as Arsenal, Newcastle United and Leeds, who have some favourable fixtures in the final four Gameweeks, by which point we’ll also know each team’s motivation for the run-in.

GAMEWEEK 35 WILDCARD: THE CONS

Is the Palace ‘double’ really that appealing?

FPL notes: Sarr on pens, Sels injury + Anderson 7-pointer 4

Crystal Palace will likely face Everton (h) and Man City (a) in Gameweek 36, which isn’t the easiest of ‘doubles’ on paper, particularly if Pep Guardiola’s side are still in the title race.

The appeal of a later Wildcard also takes a hit if Palace are still in Europe, with the UEFA Conference League semi-finals set to take place on either side of Gameweek 35, which in turn would increase the risk of domestic rotation/minute management.

The Eagles are the current bookies’ favourites to win the Conference League, too.

A worse Bench Boost?

If you Bench Boost in Gameweek 36, you’ll probably be doing it with single Gameweek options, rather than ‘doublers’.

It perhaps has limited upside compared to Gameweek 33, then, when Wildcarders could get to enjoy three bench options playing twice, as well as Fernandes.

On a Gameweek 36 Bench Boost, you’ll likely be looking at cheap options from the likes of Brighton (at home to Wolverhampton Wanderers) and Aston Villa (away at Burnley).

Time running out

By the time we reach Gameweek 35, we will be very much nearing the end of the 2025/26 season, giving the Wildcard limited time to make an impact and gain rank.

By going in Gameweek 32, it at least gives you a few more rounds of fixtures to try and eke as much out of the chip as possible.

Finally, if you do choose to pursue the Gameweek 35 Wildcard approach, it is crucial to consider Blank Gameweek 34 and ensure you have enough starters without taking multiple points hits.


price change predictions
80 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Philosopher
    • 5 Years
    2 hours, 52 mins ago

    Was pretty set on WC32, BB33, FH34 and TC36 till last week. Now I'm not sure which of the above two approaches to go for. And on top of that, I have a big deadline coming up at work this Sunday, so haven't been able to give much time trying out team combos on the site.

    Gonna be one of the trickiest decisions to make in my FPL career this.

    1. The Bandit
      • 15 Years
      2 hours, 28 mins ago

      As someone with only FH left, I hope your brain fries 😆

      1. The Philosopher
        • 5 Years
        2 hours, 20 mins ago

        Me too mate. It's tough walking around with a brain as big as this.

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 hours, 28 mins ago

      I had built my team for WC35, so now the question for me is whether to sell Ekitike for Haaland or not. If chasing, WC35 gives more ways to attack, but if protecting rank, WC32 is more likely the way.

      1. The Philosopher
        • 5 Years
        2 hours, 25 mins ago

        Rank around 150k. Would definitely like to improve it. And team looks pretty okay for 32 and can field 11 in 34 with 1 FT.

        1. Baps Hunter
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          2 hours, 7 mins ago

          I don't know if fun factor counts, but even if WC32 template isn't very strong, every man and his dog is going to try to buy CP and Ars assets as soon as they can. Climbing ranks if needed is going to be difficult in that scenario. You will have to do the same probably.

    3. The Florentine assassin
      • 3 Years
      2 hours, 13 mins ago

      I will be doing normal 2 transfers in GW32 possibly bringing Garner & Bowen in for Rayan & Pedro in preparation for GW32 & 34 then , FH 33,then 0-2 subs in GW34 dependent on injuries as I will have 11 players available in GW34 if no injuries due to Garner & Bowen being subbed in for GW32. Then WC GW35 involving bringing in 3x Man City, 3 x Crystal palace as well as Arsenal/Leeds/Brighton players.
      Then I have changed my mind from yesterday and will likely do a TC in GW36 on Haaland or Semenyo or Sarr. Then bring in 3 players for a BB in game week 37 for a Henderson/Pickford/Gabriel/Tarkowski/Rodon/Thiaw/Van Hecke/ Rice/Wilson/B. Fernandes/ A. Gordon/ Garner/ Welbeck/ Haaland/ Bowen REALITY WILL NO DOUBT BRING ME DOWN TO EARTH WITH A BANG when i rack up injuries galore or players not performing 🙂
      However i went off the WC 32 BB 33 option when Arsenal flopped out of the cup and i would have marginally preferred West Ham & Everton in the double header than Leeds & Bournemouth although I am contemplating a Bournemouth triple defence . It's just that if I now target 15 BB players for GW33 in GW32 as is alluded to in the above article, I would have 5-6 players in the Chelsea Man City game and 3 Bournemouth players against Arsenal and Leeds defender against Man Utd and no Gabrriel or B Fernandes and the only real upside would be the Brighton players. Coupled with the fact that finding 15 suitable players from the 6 teams with the fixtures they have is tricky especially as Stach/Rodon are not unknown quantities , I think i am even finding it difficult to come up with 11 that I am truly happy with.
      Having said that no doubt everyone who opts for WC 32 in my mini money league will totally burn my a*s out of sight from those money positions 🙂

    4. Dotherightthing
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 13 mins ago

      I’d keep with your initial plan. You can still put together a strong team in a we to cover the following GWs and having 11/12 doublers on gw33

  2. #1 Salah Hater
    • 1 Year
    2 hours, 45 mins ago

    This overhyping of Brighton assets will come back to bite many IMO. Awful team, awful manager, awful football.

    Apart from a decent fixture in 32 & 36, I don't get it. Spurs (A) & Chelsea (H) in the double who are both fighting for relegation/UCL spot. Not easy games.

    Van Hecke a half decent option, yet with Dunk suspended for their next 3 I can't see many (if any) clean sheets.

    1. Funkyav
      • 16 Years
      2 hours, 14 mins ago

      instead of overhyping you are underhyping

      they clearly arent awful, with an awful manager and awful football

      1. Baps Hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 hours, 11 mins ago

        I agree, but since my plan is to WC35, I hope Brighton assets have awful game vs Burnley at least 😉

      2. The Bandit
        • 15 Years
        2 hours, 9 mins ago

        Not going near them. Crap double then blank

      3. #1 Salah Hater
        • 1 Year
        2 hours, 5 mins ago

        Can mods please bookmark this post and stick it up as a standalone article just before GW38

        1. Baps Hunter
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          1 hour, 59 mins ago

          Do bookmark it yourself and brag later(!?!)

    2. Studs Up
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      1 hour, 4 mins ago

      So this is just an opinion...right??

  3. AC/DC AFC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 hours, 42 mins ago

    Good timing

    I was wondering about the merits of TC33, on Haaland, over BB with a BB36 instead?

    I'm committed to wildcard32, having played it a few weeks back

    But you could wait until 35 with this chip approach, if you have all your chips left.

    I'd probably still FH34 for simplicity.

    1. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 hours, 13 mins ago

      Basically you get Haaland twice which is quite close to playing suboptimal BB actually. However, you can get him twice also on gw36, so it's better choice on paper at least.

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 hours, 4 mins ago

        Yeah

        I'll probably still do it that way

        But if Man City beat Arsenal and Haaland is involved in a goal or two

        He's going to be well up for it against Burnley

        Traditionally his hat tricks are against the weaker clubs, think he had 19 career professional hatties already.

        You'd have Haaland times 3 x 2 games if he plays both in Gw33 or 36 on TC.

        Is that right, Man City still need to double against Palace and Brentford at home?

        Maybe that's better for TC anyhow.

    2. Bobby Digital
      • 8 Years
      2 hours, 7 mins ago

      I've already busted my BB, so TC33 is a good option for me.

    3. Dotherightthing
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 5 mins ago

      I’d still do BB33 and tc 36

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        1 hour, 1 min ago

        I think so too...

        Arsenal loosing has weakened FH34, more than anything.

        See how tonight goes first.

  4. MetallicaJack93
    • 2 Years
    2 hours, 37 mins ago

    No WC or BB

    FH 33

    When would you TC?

    1. Funkyav
      • 16 Years
      2 hours, 9 mins ago

      36

      1. MetallicaJack93
        • 2 Years
        2 hours, 6 mins ago

        Thanks, it it just MCI and CRY to double then?

    2. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 6 mins ago

      Yea Haaland TC dgw 36

    3. Dotherightthing
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 5 mins ago

      36

  5. Sailboats
    • 10 Years
    2 hours, 31 mins ago

    Who for 3rd striker? I have Haaland and Jpedro. Can buy anyone on WC and I dont mind fielding a single GW player.

    1. Dotherightthing
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 1 min ago

      Welbeck

    2. The Florentine assassin
      • 3 Years
      1 hour, 52 mins ago

      As someone already said Welbeck if you are WC 32

    3. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      1 hour, 50 mins ago

      thx both

    4. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      1 hour, 39 mins ago

      DCL

    5. WVA
      • 9 Years
      5 mins ago

      Thiago to punish you

  6. Dotherightthing
    • 10 Years
    2 hours, 31 mins ago

    On WC, For the next 2 GW:

    A - Gabriel to rodon/or another Leeds defenders Y o N?
    B - Sarr to stach/antony Y o N?

    All other spots covered with doublers + Bruno.

    Thanks very much for your help

    1. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      2 hours, 29 mins ago

      I'd keep Gabriel for sure. Not sure about B

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 hours, 28 mins ago

      Stach injured

      1. Dotherightthing
        • 10 Years
        2 hours, 27 mins ago

        Yh I know, rodon potentially too… but the idea is pretty much the same, couple of cheaper options from Leeds or Burnley

      2. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        1 hour, 13 mins ago

        Yeah

        Stach and his badly swollen ankle /ligaments looks like he has no chance

        So perhaps Leeds are an avoid?

    3. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 hours, 10 mins ago

      I’d go for Gabriel.

      For your cheap midfielder, Hinshelwood or Gomez if you can handle the risk of 9 yellow cards.

      Even Ampadu is likely to get 10-12 points over next 3 games with def con potential.

      1. Dotherightthing
        • 10 Years
        2 hours ago

        I was looking at Gomez, but then I’ve gone for verbruggen, van hecke (Burnley next seems too good) Welbeck.

        So it would have to be Leeds or Burnley in mid.

        Ampadu could work, but Sarr has 2 decent fixtures and then should double 36…

  7. SomeoneKnows
    • 10 Years
    2 hours, 28 mins ago

    With 1FT , 3.6itb and plans to FH33/WC35/BB36 what should I do?

    A) Eketike > Bowen
    Leaves me with 10 players for GW34 & 1FT for fielding 11, but with a 4-3-3 formation and one of them is injured Timber

    B) J. Pedro > Bowen
    Leaves me with 11 players for GW34 & 1FT for more flexibility, but the risk of Ekitike not playing this week and Hill as my only bench player

    Dubravka
    Virgil, Gabriel, Thiaw
    Bruno, Semenyo, Rice, Wilson
    Eketike, J.Pedro, Thiago

    (Roefs*, Enzo*, Timber*, Hill)

  8. The Philosopher
    • 5 Years
    2 hours, 27 mins ago

    A bit more clarity now.

    Team looks okay for 32. Can field XI in 34 with 1 FT. OR 152k and would like to break into 100k. Given the scenarios, which path seems better?

    A: WC32, BB33, FH34, TC36
    B: FH33, WC35, TC36, BB37/38

    1. Admiral Benson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      1 hour, 47 mins ago

      Who’s in your GW32 team? Mine looked good on paper but included players out of form like Mbeumo, Virgil, Rogers etc.

      Other problem with FH33 is that you won’t gain any ground over WC’ers as your team will be identical to theirs, minus the bench.

    2. The Florentine assassin
      • 3 Years
      1 hour, 36 mins ago

      B
      BB GW37 looks some decent fixtures in there.

    3. Dotherightthing
      • 10 Years
      1 hour, 34 mins ago

      I’d still go A. I don’t see value in BB 37/38

  9. Under my Cucurella
    • 10 Years
    2 hours, 17 mins ago

    With this squad and all chips remaining, what looks like the best chip strategy?

    Verb Dub
    Gab Timber VVD Andersen Hill
    Bruno Cunha Gordon Wilson Rayan
    Haaland Pedro Thiago

    3FT 0.1ITB

    1. The Florentine assassin
      • 3 Years
      1 hour, 23 mins ago

      Sub out Pedro for Bowen in GW 32 (this is in prep for GW 34 as well. Then FH 33 for 11 double header starters. Then in GW34 sub out 1 of your keepers for a starter keeper. Then WC 35 looking at 3x Man city, 3x Crystal Palace players as well as Arsenal/ B. Fernandes/ Brighton/ Leeds/Newcastle assets. Triple captain GW 36 on Haaland or Semenyo or even Sarr. Then BB in GW 37 with some good fixtures such as Arsenal v Burnley(Gabriel/Timber/Rice) Everton v Sunderland(Tarkovski/Pickford/Garner), Wolves v Fulham (Wilson/Anderson), Leeds v Brighton (Welbeck/Gross/Van Hecke or Stach, Rodon if you fancy Leeds), Newcastle v West Ham (Thiaw, Gordon, B Guimaraes) use your Ft's in this game week 37 to get 15 players with very good opportunities.

      1. Under my Cucurella
        • 10 Years
        1 hour, 10 mins ago

        Thanks, this is a well-thought out strategy! I currently have 9 outfield players starting for 34. So would need an additional move as well to get 11 out. Also depends on news with Timber if I'll need another move there as well. But with 3FT banked and an extra one to come with the above strategy, I would still be okay to get to 11 for 34 and WC into 35.

        1. Under my Cucurella
          • 10 Years
          1 hour, 3 mins ago

          Sorry sent too early... had more to say.

          I like the look of FH37 as well with those fixtures you mention above. As long as the teams are still playing for something and players are still nailed.

          Do you think that could pose a potential issue with the above strategy? The other way of looking at it is a WC32 would contain a lot of the players you mention in WC35 as well - 3 x City, Brighton and Leeds and Bruno. FT could then be saved and used for getting in Palace and Arsenal assets here with a BB in the double and a FH in 34 to ensure 15 players.

          With that in mind do you still think the WC35 strategy above is better?

          The main issue I have with WC32 is downgrading my team this week and not liking the 15 players for GW32.

  10. sirmorbach
    • 9 Years
    2 hours, 2 mins ago

    Hi all. Any early thoughts please? I'm undecided on my strategy.

    Chips available. 2 FT, no budget though.

    Raya
    Gabriel, Virgil, Cash
    Bruno Fernandes, Mbeumo, Semenyo, Wilson
    Haaland, João Pedro, Thiago

    Dubravka, Anderson, Hill, Mukiele

  11. CoracAld2831
    • 5 Years
    1 hour, 52 mins ago

    Which team would you pick out of these for GW32 and onwards?

    Current team:

    GKP: Kelleher (Dubravka)
    DEF: Gabriel, Timber, Van Dijk (Thiaw, Andersen)
    MID: Fernandes, Mbeumo, Gordon, Rogers, Tavernier
    FWD: Ekitike, Thiago (Kroupi Jr.)

    WC32 team & BB33:

    GKP: Verbruggen (Darlow)
    DEF: Gabriel, Van Hecke, O'Reilly (Hill, LEEDS DEF)
    MID: Bruno, Palmer, Cherki, Tavernier (Rayan)
    FWD: Haaland, Pedro, DCL

    (Bench boost would be Darlow, Fernandes, Gabriel, LEEDS DEF)

    FH33:
    GKP: Verbruggen (Darlow)
    DEF: O'Reilly, Hill, Van Hecke (Bijol, Reinildo)
    MID: Semenyo, Palmer, Neto, Tavernier (MGW)
    FWD: Haaland, Pedro, DCL

  12. PartyTime
    • 4 Years
    1 hour, 41 mins ago

    UCL Predictions

    Madrid 2-5 Bayern
    Barça 1-1 Atletico
    Sporting 0-3 Arsenal
    Psg 3-0 Liverpool

    1. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      1 hour ago

      Madrid 1-1 Bayern
      Barça 3-1 Atletico
      Sporting 2-1 Arsenal
      Psg 4-0 Liverpool

  13. bitm2007
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 hour, 25 mins ago

    xxxxxxx (xxxxxxx)
    Gabriel, Van Hecke, O'Reilly (Hill, xxxxxxx)
    Bruno, Palmer, Semenyo, Sarr (Tavernier)
    Haaland, Pedro, Thiago

    WC team, BB33, FH34

    It looks like my final decision is going to come down to

    A) Petrovic, Dúbravka, Rodon (leaves 1.1m ITB for future upgrades)
    B) Verbruggen, Darlow, Senesi

    B gives me a better keeper this GW,. but does comes with the risk of both keepers blanking in GW37 (if Leeds make cup final)

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      15 mins ago

      Looks fine

      Prefer B

      Not totally convinced by Tav or even Sarr at the moment

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        just now

        I'm not sure about Tav either but he would only play DGW33, and GW36 (if Bournemouth get a second double)

  14. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    1 hour, 20 mins ago

    Would you WC this lot?

    Alternative is Bruno/Ekitike -> SEMENYO/HAALAND next week to give me 7 DGWers plus Thiaw (BOU), Gordon (BOU), Thiago (FUL) and Gabriel (mcy). Then TC33 (Haaland), FH34, WC35, BB36.

    VERBRUGGEN
    Gabriel, GUEHI, Thiaw
    Bruno, PALMER, Gordon, Wilson
    Ekitike, Thiago, PEDRO

    DUBRAVKA, STACH, Alderete, Keane
    Bank 3.9m, all chips

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      1 hour, 10 mins ago

      It depends on number of FT

      Presumably you need to go Ekitiké to Haaland

      So what does that cost you?

      Generally hoarding chips isn't great but it depends what you want to do in Gw33 and 34.

      Which might mean going this week on the wildcard?

      1. Jinswick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        1 hour, 7 mins ago

        Just 1FT, so I’d likely save this week if not WCing, so I could get Semenyo/Haaland for free next week.

        I was looking at WC drafts for this week, and really I’d want Semenyo & Haaland and not that fussed by the rest. So is it worth it for a shoddy BB33?

  15. AC/DC AFC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    1 hour, 18 mins ago

    Front line with a BB in mind

    Haaland
    Welbeck
    Pedro or Gyok?

    Not sure I can get on board with DCL. Prefer Darlow and a Leeds defender tbh.

    1. WVA
      • 9 Years
      1 hour, 7 mins ago

      Can’t get on board with Welbeck or DCL

  16. Onana….where’s…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    1 hour, 7 mins ago

    If you WC this week to set up for rest of season (using FH33 and BB 35), how different would it be to a WC 35?

    BB in 33 doesn’t look like it’ll be huge (maybe +6 with the double game weeks assuming some rotation) and that’s easily gained this week with some of the teams and fixtures?

  17. Miguel Sanchez
    • 9 Years
    1 hour, 3 mins ago

    Bench one:

    A) Joao Pedro (MCI)
    B) Rogers (nfo)
    C) Wilson (liv)

    1. I have no Wirtz
        29 mins ago

        C

    2. I have no Wirtz
        59 mins ago

        Play one:

        A)Ekitike(FUL)
        B)Mbeumo(LEE)

        1. Miguel Sanchez
          • 9 Years
          11 mins ago

          B - I reckon they use the Fulham game to rest Ekitike for the UCL game after and to give Isak some minutes (but I expect they will start with Gakpo)

      • BB33 current forward line

        Pedro Haaland DCL

        Should Welbeck be in or leave as is?

        1. Bobby Digital
          • 8 Years
          3 mins ago

          Leave

          1. Gomez, Hinshelwood, Groß or Minteh?

        2. WVA
          • 9 Years
          just now

          DCL so bad, more likely to do ACL than return

      • If Gomez does not receive a yellow card in GW32 does that mean is clear from suspension in GW33?

        1. WVA
          • 9 Years
          36 mins ago

          Forget him

        2. Moon Dog
            5 mins ago

            No. If he receives a yellow in the first game of GW33, he'll miss the 2nd GW33 game surely.

        3. AC Pilkington
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          29 mins ago

          Who scores more?

          A) Munoz (vs NEW & WHU)

          B) Bijol (vs mun, WOL & bou) (-4)

          1. WVA
            • 9 Years
            just now

            A

        4. WVA
          • 9 Years
          24 mins ago

          Is GroB a good option? Want to keep my front three as Haaland Pedro Thiago.

        5. SomeoneKnows
          • 10 Years
          23 mins ago

          With 1FT & plans to FH33/WC35/BB36 what should I do?

          A) Eketike > Bowen
          Leaves me with 10 players for GW34 & 1FT for fielding 11, but with a 4-3-3 formation and one of them is injured Timber

          B) J. Pedro > Bowen
          Leaves me with 11 players for GW34 & 1FT for more flexibility, but the risk of Ekitike not playing this week and Hill as my only bench player

          C) Enzo > Cunha
          Leaves me with 11 players for GW34 & 1FT for more flexibility, and I'll likely bench J.Pedro / Eketike this week

        6. PartyTime
          • 4 Years
          15 mins ago

          Olise Kane Dìaz shall we!

          1. SIMBOBIANTHEIII
              just now

              Same!!!

          2. SIMBOBIANTHEIII
              just now

              Raya & DCL
              or
              Martinez & Welbeck
              Not bothered about who doubles