326 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. FPL Sanky
    • 2 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Who to captain?
    A) Wood
    B) Kluivert
    C) Bruno

    1. Limbo
      • 15 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A. Highest ceiling IMO

    2. Bobby_Baggio
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A or B for me. Swayed towards A

      1. FPL Sanky
        • 2 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Cheers... feel A is safe pick as well....a lot of people who don't own Haaland will likely captain Wood

        Bruno is in fine form as well and he plays the worst defense in the league.... thinking between A and C tbh

    3. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A

    4. Nolberto Solano
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Close between A and C for me, probably C

    5. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      C
      A
      B

      1. FPL Sanky
        • 2 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Cheers thank you

    6. Winging it
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      C

  2. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
    • 10 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Need some help folks, currently swaying towards B

    A) Cunha, Palmer > Haaland, CHO
    B) Bruno, Marmoush

    current front 8
    Palmer, Salah, Rogers, Mbeumo, Kluivert
    Isak, Cunha, Wood

    1. Nolberto Solano
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Just can't rely on Marmoush's minutes. However, as city were poor last game, you would expect Pep to change it up

      1. boc610
        • 13 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Good chance of city leaks before 1pm deadline sat id imagine

        1. Merlin the Wraith
          • 9 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          or even the extra half-hour til 1.30.

  3. gkoc
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 4 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Choose one:

    A) Get Agbadou for free and play Dango
    B) Get Agbadou and sell Dango for Munetsi/Minteh/Bellegarde for -4
    C) Get Milenković/Ait Nouri and sell Hall for Cresswell for -4

    1. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Depends on plans/team after the blank. Hits are rarely worth it for defenders unless keeping for longer than a GW.

  4. bitm2007
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    For next two GWs (planning to WC31)

    A) Palmer & Wissa for free (captain Wood)

    or

    B) Elanga (or CHO) & Haaland (c) -4

    1. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      B with CHO

      1. gkoc
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 4 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Depends on rank mostly. If you are happy with where you are, I would go Wood because he will be 110, 120 EO. If you are chasing, would prefer Haaland.

  5. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    I think I might just commit to WC30. I know we probably won't get confirmed fixtures for the DGW in 33/34 but we'll know the affected fixtures from the FA Cup so we'll know which games will have potential to be doubles. Would it really matter if they're in GW33 or 36 if you plan to FH in 34 to deal with the blank?

    Also, we already know we're gonna need 3x CPL and NEW players for DGW in 32. This draft seems very likely to be the same in 31 vs 30.

    Sels Areola
    Gabriel Gvardiol Munoz Burn Agbadou
    Salah Gordon Sarr Kluivert XX
    Haaland Isak XX

    The XX spots are for us to decide on the 3rd Palace - Eze vs Mateta and then you pick the last slot depending on who you decide to go with.
    I really don't see any of these slots being too different in WC30 vs 31. Because the Palace and Newcastle slots already take up a lot of them and when you put Haaland + Salah in, you end up with very little wiggle room.

    Arsenal for DGW33 can be tricky to fit in, but if need be, Salah > Saka is a move and you can always scrounge up some money for Timber or Raya in defense. If you WC in 30, you can start rolling FTs so that by GW33 you'll have 3 and can craft a really nice BB. FH in 34 gets you out of jail.

    1. Limbo
      • 15 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      That looks decent for DGWs but as a overall team looks lop sided to me - it's the outcome of having both Salah/Haaland. I guess the XX spots will make or break.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        How is it lopsided? The only thing you really miss is the 3rd premium mid

      2. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        With Haaland, Salah and Isak there's bound to be a compromise at the back, which is fine to make.

        1. Limbo
          • 15 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          Yeah. That's my usual strategy. Just think Gordon/Sarr looks great for DGW but not ideal week in week out when there are better options - so will need Wood/Mbeuemo in the XX spots to make it feel strong but is there funds?

          1. Camzy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            8 months, 27 days ago

            I don't think you need Mbeumo. Fixtures are tough, Brentford don't have much to play for. Wood is nice to have but without doubles, perhaps Mateta is better.

            1. Limbo
              • 15 Years
              8 months, 27 days ago

              Mateta is a shoe in agreed. Can't bring myself to drop Wood though. How often I've gone all in on doubles only to miss heaps of points from those playing once. He falls into that category for me.

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I agree

      You're playing into a future dgw regardless of when they play it.

    3. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Arsenal will likely be fine for Ipswich away in gw33.

      But Everton and Brentford they'll likely rotate heavily around the Champions League 2 legs.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Yeah Arsenal could well double in 33. In which case, I'd probably look at Raya in goal or at least Timber somewhere in there.

    4. Silecro
      • 8 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I would still recommend not using WC in 30 because things are currently so unclear that even FH34 is not set in stone. Just look at those teams that have confirmed fixture in 34: Liverpool (tot), Newcastle (will probably be tripled on them vs IPS), Wol vs Lei (Cunha and defender), and there is a huge chance NFO vs BRE goes ahead in 34 due to no European commitments, thats already enough for now even before we consider BOU vs MUN who could also easily go ahead if BOU loses vs MCI.

      The thing is, FH34 is not so clear cut (at least for me) like everyone thinks, so I would really advise waiting for any chip activation before 31 at the earliest (besides maybe AM due to its 3 week restrictions)

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        I think delaying a wildcard to optimise a FH makes no sense

        It makes more sense to do so a BB but with 10 games left the opportunities on the wildcard itself diminish

        FH34 just makes fpl selections easy in the lead up to it.

        1. Silecro
          • 8 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          I agree, I am also in the camp of those doing the WC in 31 or 32, just pointing out that there are still too many unknown variables out there before deadline of GW30

      2. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        The thing is, you don't HAVE to use FH in 34.

        My point is more that, I don't think the WC in 31 is that different to 30 even if we find out which fixtures go in which week. We still need 3x CPL and 3x NEW. We still want Salah and Haaland. We will know which games have the potential to be affected.

        Also the difference between WC30 and 31 is just 4 days. I'm guessing we'd get fixture announcements on the Friday before GW31.

        What we'd gain is more certainty on which games are doubles in 33 and which fixtures are on in 34, and we'd also get another gameweek's worth of injury/team news. That's basically it. The first part we can guess with a high degree of accuracy and even if we're wrong and there are way fewer doubles, you just don't use your FH in 34 and use the FH on a DGW instead.

        What we lose though is this: Mcy coverage for LEI, Cpl coverage for sou and also if you have Pickford, you'd be eating an away game against Liverpool as one of your fixtures when you could WC him away immediately.

      3. The Mentaculus
        • 4 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Sure there's some solid options for 34, but if you're loaded up on Liverpool, 3x Newcastle, 2x Wolves plus some Forest as you say - or any teams that don't blank, doesn't matter who they are - then it's coming at the cost of City, Villa, Palace, Arsenal or whoever the GW33 doublers are. You can't have it both ways. If you have want e.g. 8+ doublers in 33, you're screwed for 34 and vice vers

    5. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I'm on very similar draft (Aina and Hendo for Sels & Munoz), and I'm currently on Rogers & Wood for last two spots but that depends on Cup QF results. If Palace double double I will probably go down the Metata route if not it potentially comes down to

      Palace DGW32 (mci/new)
      Forest DGW33 (tot/BRE)
      VIlla DGW33 (NEW/mci), or Forest mid.

      GW31 has the advanage of being a GW closer to GW32 BB for me, and saved FT would be the same as I'm not planning to make a transfer in GW30.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Yeah I suppose. But my team for 30 is not looking good since I have 0 City and 0 Palace atm and those are the teams you want for GW30 since they play LEI and SOU.

        1. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          Yes I've got Hendo, Gvardiol,and Haaland as well for GW30 if go Haaland & CHO over Palmer & Wissa this GW.

    6. Dank Squid
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I've done that a few times in the past - wildcarding before the majority does the same, but already knowing which teams are likely to blank/double - and it actually worked. Even easier now, when so many transfers can be saved.

      Remember that there is an IB just before GW 30, could be a low-scoring week as players have been travelling etc - Manchester City and Crystal Palace have great fixtures on "paper", but the outcomes could also be a bit underwhelming. Risk involved, of course, but also a chance that it could work out nicely.

    7. Traction Engine Foot
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I am thinking similarly. Additional reasons to play the WC in 30 for me are that i still have AM and want to play it in 31, WC30 helps set my team up for that. It also allows me more flexibility in 29, I can sell Salah for Bruno and get him back easily. Losing the value is a bit annoying but I can still afford the WC team I'd want.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        If you plan to AM 31 then 100% I'd go for WC30.

    8. Kinder Mbueno
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I've been toying with this idea too, some great points raised here. Definitely worth considering. I do have 'cover' for GW30 but whether I've got everything I want or not I haven't decided yet

    9. Pumpkinhead
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Is Arbadou nailed - if so who is he replacing

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        He's nailed. He was Wolves' player of the month before he got injured.

        1. Pumpkinhead
          • 11 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          Thank you

    10. Crunchie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I agree on balance, if you have the FH chip left, play it in GW34/33 then WC 30/31 is pretty irrelevant.

      Even WC now make sense if your team need lots of hits.

      Villa/Man City are highly strong to DGW.

      I think Forest will concentrate more on CL, but you never know.

      Palace V Fulham outcome, you can FH either gamne week.

      Especially if you have AM left.

      EC 30 if you have AM and want to play it in GW31.

      Arsenal dont have to do to much to secure CL, so if Saka isn't fully ready to go GW30 to GW32 (as it is only a week and a half, then he will be prioritised for CL. So Saka is irrelevant right now..

      That WC team in GW30 /31 wouldn't look to much different and if it did, is managed by a FH33/34 depending on which way they go.

      If not BB in 32, West ham will double in GW33 is highly probably, if not they have Southampton GW33 anyway, so if playing the WC30, or 31 it would possibly have Powen in there too, and Hendo instead of Sels or Raya possibly.

      You can't have them all.

      Palace's defensive numbers are very good. They have been third in the PL table since GW14, when they (we ) only got our second win (at home) against Southampton and still didn't win our third home game until against Villa.

      Yes Place have all the tougher teams away from home now, but if Newcastle/Man City forms dont imporove a week chance of European football is not out of the question as we, have all the 6 pointers against the top 6.

      https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/formtabelle/wettbewerb/GB1?saison_id=2024&min=14&max=29

      Arsenal CL priority, Liverpool is last game, Man City/Newcastle form, and Man City will be high on FACup too, (GW30 rotation against Leicester?), Forest at home. Toughest game is Bournemouth at home IMO. (Trying to be positive that out PL season isn't over and even though with Konate going to Real as well as Trent, Guehi will go there, but manage to keep the other players and we have stilll been in profit on PSR with Andersen going to Fulham Olise (sadly to BM), and Guehi money, and Glasner possibly signing an extension to his contract.

      Just adding my own bias as a supporter,. not FPL for context

  6. Nolberto Solano
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Team is a mess. Is it worth a WC or taking a -8/-12 to field an 11? Preferably want to keep Isak, Salah & Munoz on my bench.

    Pickford

    Gabriel Mykolenko
    Palmer Mbeumo Dango Nwaneri

    Isak Watkins Cunha Salah TAA Hall Munoz Fabianski

    Options below:

    A) Cunha & Hall -> Wood (c) & RAN (9 starters)
    B) -4 Cunha, Watkins & Hall -> Wood (c), Evanilson & Gvardiol (10 starters)
    C) -8 Cunha, Watkins, Isak & TAA -> Wood, Evanilson, Haaland (c) & RAN (11 starters)
    D) -8 Cunha, Watkins, Hall & TAA -> Wood (c), Evanilson, Gvardiol & Kerkez (11 starters)
    E) -12 Cunha, Watkins, Palmer, TAA & Hall -> Wood, Haaland (c), Kluivert, Gvardiol & Kerkez (11 starters)
    F) -12 Cunha, Watkins, Dango, TAA & Hall -> Wood, Evanilson, Bruno (c), Gvardiol & Kerkez (11 starters)
    G) Wildcard

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      You could make a case for all of them

      Think I prefer D or even E and F which suggests wildcard now

      G

  7. Crystal Alice
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    GTG? Would you take any hits to improve anything?

    1.5 itb WC31

    Pickford
    Gvardiol Gabriel Robinson RAN
    Palmer Mbeumo Kluivert Dango
    Wood (C) Wissa

    Henderson Salah Isak Munoz

    1. Conners
      • 6 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Good team, no hits needed.

  8. Wolfman180
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    TAA, Palmer, Mateta, Isak to Gvardiol, Bruno, Wood, Haaland for -4?

    1. Barbarians
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      sounds like a good to go.
      not sure ab Gvardiol though, can be someone else. Aina ?

  9. Deulofail
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    How do you feel about Bellegarde and Munetsi as options? I'm considering one of them for their fixtures in BGW29 (sou), GW31 (ips) and BGW34 (LEI), before a WC in GW35. But would you expect them to start these games? And grab some goals?

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Bellegarde is the one to go for based on average heat maps. I bought him in FanTeam as a cheap enabler.

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Thanks. He certainly pops up more in highlights I've seen so far. I would be more concerned about his minutes than with Munetsi, though, based on a perusal of their minutes from the point of view of ignorance. And Munetsi seems to be getting the goal-scoring chances

        1. Dank Squid
          • 7 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          Agree with Munetsi having bigger haul potential, but he got a knock (flagged) - might actually be the riskier option, minutes-wise, right now

    2. Traction Engine Foot
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Quite like Bellegarde as a 1 week punt.

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        If it were for one week, he would be the got to as he's not flagged. Looking longer-term though

  10. Merlinho
    • 16 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Got Salah, Trent, Eze and Guehi not playing, 1 FT.

    I was going to use my FT to swap Eze for MGW, but then the Trent injury is pointing me to bring in Gvardiol. Hit for both or start 10?

  11. Philosopher's Stones
    • 5 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    To summarise the article headline:

    Sell, Neco + No

  12. Limbo
    • 15 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    I can do

    Watkins, Isaak, Konate => Haaland, Evanilson, Nico

    -4 and get 11 out (would include Dibling). I feel like I might regret dropping Isaak (significant value lost) but could move him in with Palmer to Gordon for the DGW + Mateta to replace Evanilson (have Munoz).

    Yay or Nay?

    1. Cojones of Destiny
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      yay for me

      1. Limbo
        • 15 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Ta

  13. Barbarians
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Haaland seem like no brain pick for 29 and afterwards, however, Brighton may/will score then Pedro at low cost seems like attractive option that enables to fill decent mid/def if needed.
    is it too risky to go without Robot ? save some hits and be ready for upcoming storms ?

  14. Cojones of Destiny
    • 7 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    ft used worth doing for -8 ? will wc in 30
    palmer + isak to bruno + haaland

  15. Manani
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    worth getting Haaland in with this frontline?
    will have to sell Palmer for fund, and will mean not enough FT to field 11

    Wissa Marmoush Isak

      1. Tazah
        • 7 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Mhmmm still not convinced, the white from the star on the ball makes it look like there's an indent next to the left foot.

        Either way it wasn't clear and obvious which is what VAR is for. I think having a 30sec limit on reviews would help greatly, if you need any longer then it isn't clear and obvious

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          It took them about 15 seconds to decide this, so it was obviously pretty clear to them.

          Again, they’re not making decisions off low-FPS videos compressed by Twitter.

          1. Tazah
            • 7 Years
            8 months, 27 days ago

            Hahaha I knew this comment would get you to reply.

            Anyway I just found out they had used other technology that they use for offsides that was used to confirm the double touch. Hence why they came to a decision so quickly

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              8 months, 27 days ago

              I literally said that last night

              1. Crunchie
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                8 months, 27 days ago

                Even if he didn't touch the ball, before the PK, he certainly did when he hit it.

                That said, if others where slipping, did they touch the ball after they hit the PK with their trailing foot? Thats the other question?

                VAR should always take a second look if a player slips if they take a penalty.

                Mbeumo goal would have been disallowed on VAR, if Guehi didn't get to the ball first, I would have thought.

                1. x.jim.x
                  • 11 Years
                  8 months, 27 days ago

                  Yeah, that's what was quite cruel about the Mbeumo one - if Guehi leaves it, it'd have been a free kick to Palace (not blaming him at all, mind)

  16. Sharkytect
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    I've not played close enough attention this year and have probably got TOO MANY CHIPS LEFT!

    Still have assistant manager, wildcard, bench boost and free hit to pla

    1. Sharkytect
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      y, and current 2FTs.

      Will be a fun final 6 gameweeks!

  17. Jet5605
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    2 FT and 10 starters (including Dango & O'Shea). Will WC Isak back in 31.

    A - Trent & Isak > Williams & Evanilson
    B - Other suggestion?

    A gives me the flexibility to do Wissa & Gabriel > Haaland & Timber for a -4 in GW30 or Wissa > Mateta for free if fit and Haaland flops v Brighton.

    Pickford
    Gabriel - Milenkovic - O'Shea
    Palmer - Bowen - Kluivert - Dango
    Wissa - Wood

    Dubrovka - Salah - Trent - Munoz - Isak

  18. Tazah
    • 7 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Random question, since Asensio is on loan from psg, can he play against them next round of champions league?

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Yes, the BBC page has done a good piece on this & he is eligible to play.

    2. Philosopher's Stones
      • 5 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Pretty certain nobody at PSG thought this scenario would someday arise while they were loaning him to Aston Villa.

      1. Merlin the Wraith
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Their loss. He wasn't getting the game time at PSG so they probably wouldn't have picked him anyway.

  19. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Thoughts:
    Henderson* Sels
    Gvardiol Gabriel Ait Nouri Milenkovich Munoz*
    Bruno Kluivert Mbeumo Enzo Salah*
    Evanilson Wood Haaland

    Who to bench?

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Henderson, Munoz, and Salah 😉

      1. RoyaleBlue
        • 14 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Honestly Enzo:
        1) Enzo
        2) RAN
        3) Milenko
        That’s my order for who to bench for that final spot

        1. Eze Really?
          • 11 Years
          8 months, 27 days ago

          Cheers. Think the same but Enzo finding some form further forward.

          1. RoyaleBlue
            • 14 Years
            8 months, 27 days ago

            If you’re gonna start Gabi, then you’re kinda washing by playing both. If Enzo scores or assists then Gabi gets a 2 pointer. Greatest upside in not having attacker playing against defender. Though it’s fine if you wanna play it safer and spread your bets

            1. Eze Really?
              • 11 Years
              8 months, 27 days ago

              How I was thinking. 50/50 IMO. Cheers.

          2. Crunchie
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            8 months, 27 days ago

            Yeah Enzo was playing further forward because it was Southampton and Leicester though. Probably Enzo if playing Gabs.

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Guess it's between Enzo & Aït Nouri. Probably Enzo

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Tnks. The votes seem that way too.

  20. cescpistols1
    • 10 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Dead-ending before WC GW30. 1FT, 2,9ITB. Which option should I go for?

    A. Hall + Fabianski -> Gvardiol + Sels (-4)
    B. Hall + Fabianski -> Aina + Onana (-4)
    C. Hall + Fabianski -> Dalot + Sels (-4)

    Fabianski*
    Gabriel Mykolenko Hall*
    Palmer Mbeumo Savinho Semenyo
    Wood (c) Raul S.Larsen

    Henderson Salah TAA Konate

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A

    2. Kinder Mbueno
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A

    3. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A

  21. FDMS All Starz
    • 10 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Which combo? For the next 2?

    A) Haaland (c), Kluivert, Dango(wissa in gw30)

    B) Wood(c), Kluivert, Palmer

    C) Evanilson, Bruno(c), Palmer

    1. Bucket Man
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Tough choice between A and B. I'd go B

  22. Stranger Mings
    • 5 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    A) just do diaz to kluivert
    B) lose isak & palmer for haaland & kluivert -4?
    Thanks

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      B if captaining Haaland

      1. Stranger Mings
        • 5 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Yep cheers would

  23. CAP
    • 12 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    What would everyone's hit limit be to go with a free hit instead?

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Maybe -12 max. Definitely would do a -8 over FH. All depends how many points you think FH will earn you if used later in the season versus using this week.

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Depends on remaining players.
      Will it be worth using the FH now? Probably not. I would play 10 if it goes down to a -8.

  24. DagheMunegu
    • 5 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Pickford
    Gabriel Greaves Huijsen
    Palmer Semenyo Kluivert Mbeumo
    Wissa

    Fab Salah TAA Isak Cunha

    Cunha Isak Palmer to Haaland Larsen Bruno -8 yes or no ?

    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Will you make up the 8?
      Isak tricky to move on with imminent doubles.
      I would move TAA now.

      1. DagheMunegu
        • 5 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        WC 30/31 so will get Isak back

        Selling TAA means playing 442 with a cheap mid like Elanga

  25. Jet5605
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Anyone going without Haaland? I think Mateta in 30 (sou) is a great fixture and can come close to matching Haaland v LEI.

    Thinking Isak > Evanilson this week and Wissa > Mateta next week both for free.

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Yeah, can't be bothered mashing up my squad to get Haaland. Marmoush/Isak/Wood at mo so Mateta will come in for Wood in my GW30 WC.

    2. Boz
      • 13 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Not essential for me either. Brighton isn't an easy fixture

      1. Jet5605
        • 11 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Even when he plays LEI Salah is a great option for the armband v EVE

  26. The Mighty Whites
    • 10 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    A: Play two of Colwill, Bednarek & Dango
    B: Play one of Colwill / Bednarek & Dango to CHO (-4)

    1. Boz
      • 13 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I don't think Dango out is worth a hit so A

    2. Bucket Man
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A. Colwill and Dango

    3. Stranger Mings
      • 5 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      A

  27. Boz
    • 13 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Is anything worth an FT here? Thinking of saving and targeting GW30 before the WC31 and rolling transfers through. Maybe Dango out? Don't mind playing Greaves or JP.

    Pickford
    Gab Milenkovic Robinson Greaves
    Dango Kluivert Palmer Mbuemo
    Wood JP

    Fab, Salah, Isak, Konate

    3FTs 4.5itb

    1. Bucket Man
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I'd say Greaves but then your replacement could be a 2 pointer like wise so probably Django if any to Gibbs White possibly but looks fine

      1. Boz
        • 13 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Yeah I don't really see a defender transfer that's worth it. Could do another forest I suppose but Ipswich more likely to score than not imo.

        MGW, Bruno and Bowen all looking at for Dango. Likely Bruno I'd say

  28. One More Hit
    • 7 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    I've taken a -8 and will still only get 10 out. Just have to hope that Haaland hauls as captain, and that introducing the Forest lads pays off.

    Cunha > Haaland
    Diaz > MGW
    Palmer > Elanga

    1. Maddamotha
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      Well you sold Palmer who has a game though…

      1. One More Hit
        • 7 Years
        8 months, 27 days ago

        Needed the cash and he's so far off form that I felt it worth the risk.

    2. Crunchie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      If you get Forest/Man City leaks and Marmoush starts, you could keep Palmer if you wanted too and move Diaz to Foden or a Forest Mid?

  29. Krap Nottarf
    • 13 Years
    8 months, 27 days ago

    Any one going without a keeper? Have Allison/Turner and 1FT with money in bank for any keeper but thinking of saving the FT instead

    1. Kinder Mbueno
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 27 days ago

      I am thinking to do this. Would rather play 10 outfield players than get a keeper with only 9 outfield