Pro Pundits
28 March 2025 76 comments
zøphar zøphar
Share:

Zophar hosts his weekly Fantasy Premier League (FPL) Q&A ahead of Gameweek 30. Here, there is chat about chip usage, Crystal Palace and possible one-week punts.

Our writers are providing regular articles throughout the season, with only subscribers able to access every single one. You can still get 20% off a Premium Membership by signing up here. Once aboard, you’ve locked in the price of your Premium Membership for good, so long as you don’t cancel!

Triple Captain Assistant Manager


Q: If you have no Crystal Palace or Newcastle United players, would you Wildcard now, given the favourable entry point for both teams?

Which Crystal Palace midfielder: Eze or Sarr? 6

(via FPL VIRGIN)

A: I’m in a position similar to yours. I sold Alexander Isak (£9.3m) before Blank Gameweek 29 to make room for Erling Haaland (£14.8m) and I need to get the Swedish international back sharpish. Possibly for Gameweek 30.

I think most of us are now looking at Wildcarding in Gameweek 31, rather than Gameweek 30, with the primary reasoning that we’ll likely have a clearer picture of the schedule after these FA Cup quarter-finals. Yes, the blank fixtures will be known with these weekend results, but rescheduling might not be announced by Gameweek 30.

Given what we’ve seen previously, it’s perilous to assume that the Double Gameweeks will be scheduled as ‘expected’.

For what it’s worth – and it indeed is very little – Brentford have recently tightened up in away games. They’ve conceded just twice in their last four trips on the road. I see a bigger immediate appeal for Palace, with Daniel Munoz (£5.1m), Ismaila Sarr (£5.6m) and Jean-Philippe Mateta (£7.5m) all looking prime for points against Southampton.

Unless your team is decimated by injuries or we get full fixture confirmation by Tuesday’s deadline, I still like waiting for Gameweek 31. The points potentially gained with a clear picture of the schedule could be greater than when using it now.


Q: I’m going to Wildcard in Gameweek 31, but have cash from selling Trent Alexander-Arnold (£7.3m) burning a hole in my pocket. Is there anyone with high upside you would take a one-week hit for?

FPL notes: Pedro assist, benchings + Bournemouth attackers

(via FP ELEPHANT)

A: Looking at the Gameweek 30 fixtures, Manchester City, Bournemouth and Palace play the three promoted sides. These have plenty of upside.

If you can’t stretch to Haaland, I think I most like investing in the Eagles. If the big Norwegian is doable, he could instantly pay off a four-point hit, especially if you captain him. Otherwise, I really like Mateta and his low ownership.


Q: What’s the best strategy for the season with these remaining chips: Wildcard, Assistant Manager, Bench Boost, Free Hit? I have a good Gameweek 30 team, but unsure beyond that.

FPL Gameweek 26 round-up: Saturday’s goals, assists, bonus points + stats 7

(via @PiegionF)

A: With the fixture schedule still a bit murky, it’s difficult to answer this question with absolute certainty and clarity. What we do know is that Gameweek 34 will likely be a blank, so the Free Hit looks ideal for then, especially as those absent teams will probably double in Gameweek 33.

As mentioned, a Gameweek 31 Wildcard looks ideal for the run-in, with the fixture schedule expected to be clear by then.

With Bench Boost, you could aim for the big Double Gameweek 33 or potentially Newcastle and Palace’s Double Gameweek 32, though the latter is also a good activation point for Triple Captain.

Assistant Manager chip is perhaps the trickiest one, as it’s active for three consecutive rounds. If Palace beat Fulham and get given consecutive doubles (32 and 33), then using it on Oliver Glasner has appeal.

It can follow a Gameweek 31 Wildcard, but would need switching to another boss for Gameweek 34. That’s when Palace either blank or visit Arsenal. This idea makes Bench Boost and Triple Captain tricky, as we may not have any more doubles.

So I still like using Assistant Manager during the closing three Gameweeks, as it can align with your rank goals. By then, you know what kind of points you need to overtake mini-league rivals and you can chase the table bonus in all three fixtures.

It’s not a chip that needs to be used purely in doubles. If you strike gold, you’d be looking at something like 60 points over the final few rounds. It’s a true ‘Hail Mary’ chip for FPL managers.


This week’s Q&A was short, as most of us are still in FPL hibernation while waiting for the schedule to become clearer.

The next edition will come after these cup fixtures, where there should be more clarity.



76 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Knights Template
    • 12 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    How do we get the Mentaculus back Zophar, that’s what everyone wants to know!

  2. Merlin the Wraith
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Question for Ragabolly or FPLMarc if they're about. Have tried to get through to LiveFPL & it's price predictor both through the links on here & through the browser. It just indicates '500 Internal server error' Are they aware of this?

    1. avfc82
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Yeah it's been flagged.

      Can you try this and let me know if it works... https://plan.livefpl.net/prices

      1. Merlin the Wraith
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        Cheers! will do. Get back to you.

      2. Merlin the Wraith
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        Yup, downloaded ok to desktop. Font looks a bit odd but does the job. Thanks, much appreciated fella. UTV!

  3. Sho-kun
    • 8 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Palmer+Wood > Sarr+Haaland?

    WC in GW31

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Makes a lot of sense. 100% do it if you think Haaland is the best Captain this week

    2. niaz1982
      • 6 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      i am wondering this as in same boat but worry about transfer value. More so on Wood as he was £6.7m when i bought him but now £7.3m if i need to rebuy? Palmer looks to be same as what i had.

      I've got all chips so thinking GW31 WC.

    3. Deus
      • 8 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      yup, i did it myself

  4. RoyaleBlue
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    I still have WC, AM FH, BB

    I’m set on one of these two strategies:

    If palace progress: WC30, AM31-33, FH 34, find a week to BB (will try set up a bench for 35 though it’s far out from WC).

    If palace lose: WC 31, BB 32, FH 33, AM after to include a DGW if possible

    This strat hinges on the idea that palace get DGW 33. So would have back to back doubles with loads of Table bonus opportunities.

    1. Leobinsk
      • 7 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      If Palace progress you might not know if there double will be confirmed in GW33 by the GW30 deadline. So you could end up playing the wildcard and then the GW34 game could get moved elsewhere. Do you have a plan B if this happens? Would you still be using AM 31-33?

  5. Big Mike
    • 3 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Anyone fancy a cuppa?

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Bournemouth/Preston/City/Forest/Brighton/Villa/Fulham/Palace.

  6. Jimjam
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    I still have my TC, as well as FH, BB and WC.

    If I have to use one of them in a single gameweek - TC or BB?

    1. RoyaleBlue
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      BB for me. It’s very unlikely you get to 15 DGWers anyways. If I had TC still it would be going on Isak GW 32

  7. balint84
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Sel Fernandes or Palmer for Salah?

    1. Big Mike
      • 3 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Palmer

  8. Vasshin
    • 6 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    If Palace looses in FA cup, then no double double for Palace but just one double in 32.

    So in that scenario, how many Palace players are you planning to get for 32 in your team?

    1. Qaiss
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Still 3

      1. Merlin the Wraith
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        3 here too. Already had Munoz. Mateta coming in for Wood. Sarr a good enabler at his price for Dango.

    2. bruik
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Depends on DGW33 double fixtures.

  9. balint84
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    1) Palmer vs TOT
    2) Fernandes vs NOT

  10. SouthCoastSaint
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Any Gvardiol news?

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Not seen anything in the Pep presser. Still unflagged, waiting for news on him too.

  11. In Klopp ITrust
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Can someone remind me whether or not free transfers carry over the week following using the wildcard Chip?

    Thanks in advance!

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Yes, if for example you had 2FT prior to wildcarding the following week you'ld still have 2 the following week.

      1. In Klopp ITrust
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 2 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        Thanks, Merlin. Does this apply to other chips as well, like Free Hit?

        1. Merlin the Wraith
          • 9 Years
          8 months, 12 days ago

          Yes it does

  12. MetallicaJack93
    • 2 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Mbeumo/Wood to Sarr/Mateta for a hit?

  13. royals forever
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    When would you WC this team in GW30 or wait an extra week

    Sels Flekken

    Gvardiol Gabriel RAN Mykolenko Porro

    Salah Palmer Sarr Mitoma Kluivert

    Wood Isak Wissa

    1FT 0.6 ITB

    WC, TC, BB and FH remaining

    Any ideas would be appreciated

  14. V-2 Schneiderlin
    • 15 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    in the above article - "f you can’t stretch to Haaland, I think I most like investing in the Eagles. If the big Norwegian is doable, he could instantly pay off a four-point hit, especially if you captain him" -

    why not just get Marmoush instead? or am I missing something?

    1. SouthCoastSaint
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Not a dead cert to start

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Rotation risk
      Not on pens
      Not as good a player

      Other than that, top draw

      1. Malkmus
        • 14 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        I agree with top 2 but in last 5 games marmoush does have 4 x G, 1 x A, against 2 x G, 1 x A for Haaland, so it isn't that clear cut imo. I've got both fwiw.

        1. Runnerboy31
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 4 Years
          8 months, 12 days ago

          But that’s just a matter of sample size. Marmoush scored a hat trick, he’s also done absolutely nothing in 5 of his 7 games. We don’t have enough sample size to know what to typically expect from Marmoush.

          We know what to expect from Haaland.

          1. Malkmus
            • 14 Years
            8 months, 12 days ago

            I'm not sure we do know what to expect from Haaland though, that's the point. He has never been in this kind of form for years, possibly ever. Salah has been in the form of his life this year so has outscored Diaz completely although at the start of the season it looked a close decision between the two. Haaland's form is nowhere near that. I've got both - but will lose marmoudh on wc in 31 - but there is a lot of luck involved and some punters with just marmoush could win out.

            1. Runnerboy31
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 4 Years
              8 months, 12 days ago

              In the last 10 games he has played, Haaland has blanked twice. His form has actually been perfectly fine from an fpl perspective. As I say Marmoush is perfectly viable but I think people are kidding themselves if they think the most likely out is a comparable output to Haaland.

              It might well work, and I’m not completely set on Haaland myself, but just don’t put too much focus on small sample sizes.

              IMO and I got a lot of stick at the time, it was never a close decision between Salah and Diaz. They broadly matched for 5 games having never been close in any previous season, there was very little pointing to Diaz being able to keep it up. Again, the danger of small sample sizes.

              1. Malkmus
                • 14 Years
                8 months, 12 days ago

                Fair enough, Haaland's form has improved recently, but this season has been a major dip for him considering his usual form and goal scoring stats. I've kept him all season which has cost me hugely as I just couldn't believe his bad form would keep up.

                If I was on WC I would get Haaland ahead of marmoush no question, but if no wc then I think it's fair to go marmoush only as a punt. Haaland should come out on top though.

        2. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          8 months, 12 days ago

          Last 5 games is a weird cutoff, what about last 10?

          1. Malkmus
            • 14 Years
            8 months, 12 days ago

            Marmoush has only played 7

    3. Runnerboy31
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      To make an analogy from the start of the season. Do you remember who everyone bought Diaz because he could cover Salah for half the price. This is a similar scenario, it MIGHT work but the odds are Haaland materially out scores Marmoush.

  15. TeddiPonza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Best 4,4m def for 1 week before wildcard?

    A. Rico Lewis
    B. Zabarnyi
    C. Chris Richards

    Thanks

  16. balint84
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Bench
    1) Palmer vs TOT
    2) Fernandes vs NOT

    1. boombaba
      • 12 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Neither

  17. boombaba
    • 12 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Mateta or Marmoush for 1 week punt ?

    1. Malkmus
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      If you have Haaland then Mateta

  18. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Crystal Palace manager Oliver Glasner on Jean-Philippe Mateta's fitness: "Oh yes, he trains now for two weeks with us. Of course, always with his protection and it's also important for him to train a little bit. We had an internal game during the international break where he could play for 60 minutes without any problems. He's ready."

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Wolves manager Nuno on Raul Jimenez’s fitness: "Oh yes, he trains now for two weeks with us. Of course, always with his protection and it's also important for him to train a little bit. We had an internal game during the international break where he could play for 60 minutes without any problems. He's ready."

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        I'm wondering how the mask will affect him as well.

  19. estheblessed
    • 10 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    WC attempt. Any feedback welcome...

    Raya
    Kerkez, Gvardiol, Munoz
    Sarr, Bruno, Salah, Kliuvert
    Mateta, Marmoosh, Isak

    Sels, Gabriel, Mbeumo, Livramento

    1. boombaba
      • 12 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Needs robot

      1. estheblessed
        • 10 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        Who?

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          8 months, 12 days ago

          The big Norwegian chap.

          1. estheblessed
            • 10 Years
            8 months, 12 days ago

            Haaland means big sacrifices. I think Marmoosh could outscore him potentially.

            1. estheblessed
              • 10 Years
              8 months, 12 days ago

              But I might try and see what a team looks like with him in. Thanks

              1. Merlin the Wraith
                • 9 Years
                8 months, 12 days ago

                Make your own mind up fella, I've put Marmoush in too. There's going to be a lot of noise on here from armchair experts over the next 4 days telling you he won't start/can't play the low block/has only returned in 2 starts. It's your choice. & different.

            2. FPL Virgin
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 9 Years
              8 months, 12 days ago

              You obviously haven't been reading what Neale has said about Marmoosh then. He may not even start against Leicester.

            3. Runnerboy31
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 4 Years
              8 months, 12 days ago

              A lot of people argued Diaz and Jota might out score Salah. Marmoush is viable but I’d been clear on the risk, he’s likely not just cheap Haaland.

              1. Merlin the Wraith
                • 9 Years
                8 months, 12 days ago

                That's fine. At this stage of the season I'm playing for nothing but fun. Haaland is Oh yeah... Marmoush is fun & gives me £s to get other better players. I'm not tying in 14.8m into someone everyone else is saying to get.
                #shearthesheep.

    2. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Too template.

    3. Conners
      • 6 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      It's good provided Marmoush keeps his place.

      Will be tricky getting your starting 11 right most weeks. I think you'll bench a ton of points.

    4. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Way too much invested in defense.

      I don't mind a Haaland-less draft but I'd still have a fairly trim defense in case I'd want to invest the funds in a player like Saka, Palmer or Foden.

      1. Runnerboy31
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 4 Years
        8 months, 12 days ago

        Not sure I’d agree. Bruno can be the makeweight for those you describe plus downgrading a defender if and when needed.

        I’ve been anti big at the back all season but with Arsenal and City not offering many compelling midfield options at present I think it’s make sense to fund these teams through defence.

    5. Malkmus
      • 14 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Gab and Gvardiol seems too much to me with no Haaland. Def is too heavy imo

  20. balint84
    • 9 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Konate or Munoz?

    1. estheblessed
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Munoz

    2. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Munoz

  21. Dennis System
    • 7 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Palmer + CHO > Saka + Sarr??

    1. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Not for me - Saka may have his minutes managed with the CL coming up.

    2. STHH
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      CHO to Sarr yes. Price could change soon but he has an FA Cup match to get through so wise to wait.

      Palmer to Saka I like less. Palmer for sure needs to go, scoring poorly against very weak opposition recently.

      Saka feels like a huge risk. If you need a risk to gain rank, then consider it. Maybe that's what people ahead of you in your leagues are hoping for. He is not 100% fit and may not even play this weekend, or just feature as a cameo. After that, the fixtures are adjacent to Champions League matches against Real Madrid, which would be the priority matches as top 5 looks safe and winning the league feels unlikely now.

      So, who else should be considered? I'd go for Palace and Newcastle for the next three GWs, or Bournemouth and Brighton. Leicester, Southampton and Ipswich look pretty hopeless so it's all about targeting teams playing them. Saka plays Ipswich in GW33, which is the earliest I'll consider him at the moment.

  22. The Iceman
    • 3 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Pretty set on WC30 as my team is a mess (will wait until after the FA Cup fixtures have been played).

    Only used TC so far. What's the best option for me here please?

    1) Triple Palace, double Newcastle, Howe AM 31-33
    2) Triple Newcastle, double Palace, Glasner AM 31-33
    3) Neither and save AM for later i.e. 36-38

  23. Malkmus
    • 14 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    GTG? 0FT, 0.3ITB, plan to WV gw31.

    Sa (Fab)
    Kerkez - Munoz - N Williams
    Salah - Rogers - Kluivert - Palmer
    Haaland (c) - Marmoush - Isak

    Subs - Dango, Robonson, Greaves

    Ta

  24. HollywoodXI
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    WC draft (subject to FA Cup results obvs). What do you think?

    Raya Areola
    Munoz Gvardiol Kerkez Burn Agbodou
    Salah Kluivert Murphy Sarr Bowen
    Haaland Isak Mateta

    1. estheblessed
      • 10 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Looks good im not keen on Bowen but he can pick up points no doubt.

    2. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 months, 12 days ago

      Gvardiol going to be ok?

  25. STHH
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    If you had to choose 3 players from each of Palace, Newcastle and Man City right now, who are you going with? Assume money and FTs are no object.

    Munoz, Isak, Haaland and Sarr feel like must-have options, but happy to be shot down on that.