Team News

Line-Up Lessons – Gameweek 7 – Part Two

As expected, Gabriel Jesus replaces Sergio Aguero in an otherwise settled Man City team, while Jose Mourinho surprises us all by starting a doubtful Phil Jones, while resting Eric Bailly in his defence. Elsewhere, Chancel Mbemba is omitted by Rafa Benitez while Virgil van Dijk is reinstated to the Southampton rearguard.

Here’s part two of Line-up Lessons, assessing the teamsheets and formations from Gameweek 7, with one eye on developments after the international break. Part one can be viewed here.

Manchester City

Starting XI: Ederson; Walker, Stones, Otamendi, Delph; Fernandinho;  De Bruyne (Danilo 90), D Silva (B Silva 76); Sterling, Sane (Gundogan 84), Jesus. Subs not used: Bravo, Mangala, Zinchenko, Toure.

  • What we saw: Pep Guardiola kept faith in the 4-1-2-3 formation for the trip to Chelsea, with Gabriel Jesus returning as the central striker in place of the injured Sergio Aguero. In the absence of Benjamin Mendy, Fabian Delph was preferred to Danilo at left-back. He was later introduced, along with Ilkay Gundogan in order to hold onto the 1-0 lead, leaving just Raheem Sterling and Jesus in attack.
  • What we learned: With a home fixture against Stoke City up next, Guardiola is expected to continue with the 4-1-2-3 system. Man City do face Napoli in the UEFA Champions League in between Gameweeks 8 and 9, though, so rotation is a concern. Jesus should lead the attack against the Potters, but there is a chance Aguero may be ready to return against Burnley. Bernardo Silva is a viable alternative to Sterling, Sane and David Silva, while Gundogan could also be a factor in central midfield. Danilo should see some minutes in either full-back position over the next two league fixtures, while Vincent Kompany (calf) may be ready to return after the international break, threatening Stones’ pitch-time in particular.

Current Status: Fairly Settled
Risk Areas: Full-backs, central defenders, flanks

Manchester United

Starting XI: De Gea; Valencia, Jones, Smalling, Young; Matic, Fellaini; Mata (Herrera 76), Mkhitaryan (Lingard 66), Rashford (Martial 71); Lukaku. Subs not used: Bailly, Blind, Romero, Darmian.

  • What we saw: Jose Mourinho retained the usual 4-2-3-1 formation for the visit of Crystal Palace to Old Trafford, with Antonio Valencia, Phil Jones and Marouane Fellaini – who had all been pre-match doubts to varying degrees – available to start. Eric Bailly was handed a rest, with Chris Smalling given his first league start of the season in central defence. The Man United boss switched to a 4-3-3 late on, with Ander Herrera in central midfield, and fellow substitutes Jesse Lingard and Anthony Martial flanking central striker Romelu Lukaku.
  • What we learned: Mourinho continues to favour the 4-2-3-1, particularly against the lesser sides, but with a trip to Liverpool up next, there is a reasonable chance he opts for a more solid 4-3-3. That could mean Herrera joining Nemanja Matic and Marouane Fellaini in central midfield, with Juan Mata more likely to make way than Henrikh Mkhitaryan on the right of a front three. Martial and Rashford continue to be locked in rotation for the left flank role, although Rashford has now started six of the seven Gameweeks, with Martial used mainly in European ties. In defence, Bailly will be expected to return to replace Smalling at Anfield.

Current Status: Fairly Settled
Risk Areas: Central midfield, attacking midfield

Newcastle United

Starting XI: Elliot; Yedlin, Lascelles, Clark, Manquillo; Shelvey, Merino (Hayden 75); Ritchie, Perez (Diame 90), Atsu; Joselu (Gayle 78). Subs not used: Murphy, Lejeune, Darlow, Gamez.

  • What we saw: Rafa Benitez stuck with the 4-4-1-1 system for the home meeting with his former club Liverpool, but did opt to recall former Reds midfielder Jonjo Shelvey in place of Isaac Hayden. Chancel Mbemba was also surprisingly left out of the matchday squad, with Javier Manquillo recalled at left-back.
  • What we learned: Following another positive result, we should see a very similar line-up for the trip to Southampton. Manquillo and Shelvey may have done enough to retain their starts ahead of Mbemba and Hayden, while changes appear unlikely elsewhere. Matt Ritchie has withdrawn from the Scotland squad due to a knock, but he will be expected to be in contention for the south coast trip. The likes of Florian Lejeune, Jacob Murphy and Dwight Gayle all look unlikely to force their way back into the starting XI for now.

Current Status: Settled
Risk Areas: Left-back, central midfield

Southampton

Starting XI: Forster; Cedric Soares, Van Dijk, Yoshida, Bertrand; Romeu, Lemina (Austin 86), Davis (Boufal 61); Tadic, Long, Redmond (Gabbiadini 67). Subs not used: McCarthy, Hoedt, Hojbjerg, Ward-Prowse.

  • What we saw: Mauricio Pellegrino decided to hand a first start of the season to Virgil van Dijk, with Wesley Hoedt making way in central defence. The rest of the side remained unchanged in the usual 4-2-3-1 formation. Sofiane Boufal was introduced onto the left wing just after the hour mark. Dusan Tadic moved to the No 10 role, and Shane Long to the right once Manolo Gabbiadini was brought on as the lone striker. That became a 4-2-4 late on, with Charlie Austin joining the Italian up front.
  • What we learned: After making a strong impression from the bench, Boufal could come into contention for a start when Newcastle visit St Mary’s in Gameweek 8. Any of the three starting attacking midfielders could make way, while in attack, Gabbiadini and Austin are viable alternatives to Long. Van Dijk and Yoshida may again be favoured in central defence, although Hoedt will push for a recall should Pellegrino wish to freshen things up.

Current Status: Fairly Settled
Risk Areas: Central defenders, flanks, attacking midfield, lone striker

Stoke City

Starting XI: Butland; Zouma, Cameron, Wimmer; Diouf (Johnson 90), Fletcher, Allen, Pieters; Shaqiri (Afellay 87), Choupo-Moting, Berahino (Crouch 70). Subs not used: Grant, Tymon, Adam, Sobhi.

  • What we saw: Potters boss Mark Hughes used a 3-4-2-1 formation against Southampton, with Xherdan Shaqiri playing centrally behind lone striker Saido Berahino, while Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting operated wider on the left. Hughes welcomed back Kurt Zouma, Geoff Cameron and Kevin Wimmer in central defence, with Glen Johnson and Ramadan Sobhi dropping to the bench.
  • What we learned: Jese Rodriguez missed the 2-1 victory due to compassionate leave but the Spaniard should be available again for the Gameweek 8 trip to Manchester City. Despite scoring the winner against the Saints Peter Crouch appears unlikely to force his way into the starting XI for City, so Jese could get the nod over Berahino in attack. Bruno Martins Indi (groin) isn’t expected to be available for the trip to the Etihad, while Ryan Shawcross (back) remains doubtful, so the three-man defence looks set to remain untouched.

Current Status: Settled
Risk Areas: Central defenders, lone striker

Swansea City

Starting XI: Fabianski; Naughton, Fernandez, Mawson, Olsson (Clucas 87); Britton (Roque Mesa 69); Sanches, Ayew, Carroll; Abraham, Bony (Fer 46). Subs not used: Nordfeldt, van der Hoorn, Rangel, Narsingh.

  • What we saw: After ending the Gameweek 6 defeat to Watford in a 4-1-2-1-2 midfield diamond, head coach Paul Clement stuck with that system for the trip to West Ham. Ayew started at the tip with the recalled Leon Britton at the base. Renato Sanches also returned in central midfield for the Swans, with Sam Clucas and Leroy Fer dropping to the bench. Fer was introduced at half-time, with Bony feeling tightness in his hamstring. The Dutchman operated at the tip of the diamond, with Ayew shifted slightly further forward in support of Abraham.
  • What we learned: The Welsh outfit have confirmed that Bony suffered no injury at the London Stadium, so providing he returns from international duty fully fit, he should be available for the Gameweek 8 clash at home to Huddersfield Town. Clement is expected to keep with the back four, so his options appear to be to either stick with the 4-1-2-1-2 formation, or consider switching to a 4-3-3. In the 4-1-2-1-2, Ayew, Bony and Abraham all appear certain starters, with Roque Mesa, Fer and Sam Clucas different options in midfield. Both Nathan Dyer and Ki Sung-yeung have featured for the U23s over the past week as they look to build up their match fitness, and may have an outside chance of being available to feature from the bench against the Terriers.

Current Status: Slightly Unsettled
Risk Areas: Central midfield, flanks, forwards

Tottenham Hotspur

Starting XI: Lloris; Alderweireld, Sanchez, Vertonghen; Trippier (Walker-Peters 82), Winks, Dier, Davies; Eriksen (Sissoko 74), Alli; Kane (Son Heung-min 87). Subs not used: Vorm, Nkoudou, Llorente, Foyth.

  • What we saw: Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino again turned to the 3-4-2-1 formation against Huddersfield Town, although he did hand a first league start of the season to Harry Winks, who replaced Moussa Sissoko in central midfield. Kieran Trippier came in for the suspended Serge Aurier at right wing-back.
  • What we learned: Following the emphatic 4-0 win, Pochettino is expected to stick with the majority of the same side for the visit of Bournemouth to Wembley after the international break. Sissoko could replace Winks in central midfield, while Mousa Dembele will also be an option if he is fit following an ankle injury. Aurier will be available again following his one-match ban and is a viable alternative to Trippier at right wing-back. Son Heung-min could operate on the left wing if Pochettino considers switching to a 4-2-3-1 formation against the Cherries, with Davinson Sanchez’s start in doubt should he use that system.

Current Status: Settled
Risk Areas: Right wing-back, central midfield

Watford

Starting XI: Gomes; Femenia, Mariappa, Kabasele, Holebas; Doucoure, Capoue (Pereyra 62); Carrillo (Gray 74), Cleverley, Richarlison; Deeney. Subs not used: Karnezis, Janmaat, Britos, Hughes, Watson.

  • What we saw: Despite Miguel Britos being available following his three-match ban, Marco Silva decided to stick with Adrian Mariappa and Christian Kabasele in central defence against West Bromwich Albion. The Hornets head coach only made one change, with Troy Deeney handed his first league start of the season in place of Andre Gray as the lone striker in the usual 4-2-3-1 formation. When Silva decided to introduce Roberto Pereyra, he switched to a 4-1-4-1, with the Argentine joining Tom Cleverley in central midfield. The Watford boss then switched to a 4-4-2, with Pereyra moving out to the right and Gray joining Deeney up front.
  • What we learned: Silva demonstrated that when chasing a match, he isn’t afraid to throw men forward in more attacking formations. Up next for the Hornets is a home meeting with Arsenal, so Britos may push for a recall in central defence, while should either Sebastian Prodl (hamstring) or Younes Kaboul (leg) be available, they could also be in contention. Gray’s pace on the counter-attack could see him get the nod over Deeney’s physicality against the Gunners.

Current Status: Fairly Settled
Risk Areas: Central defenders, lone striker

West Bromwich Albion

Starting XI: Foster; Dawson, Hegazi, Evans, Gibbs; Krychowiak, Barry; Brunt (Livermore 62), Rodriguez, Phillips (McClean 58); Rondon (Robson-Kanu 72). Subs not used: Myhill, Nyom, Morrison, Chadli.

  • What we saw: Baggies head coach Tony Pulis opted for a 4-4-1-1 formation against Watford. Salomon Rondon returned as the lone striker, with Jay Rodriguez operating just behind the Venezuelan. Matt Phillips (right) and Chris Brunt (left) were handed recalls out wide, with Jake Livermore and Allan Nyom dropping to the bench. Pulis switched to a 4-5-1 during the second half, with James McClean taking over down the right wing, while Rodriguez shifted over to the left.
  • What we learned: It’s likely we’ll only see Pulis switch to a back three against the leading clubs, so with a trip to Leicester City up next, he is expected to use either a 4-4-1-1 or a 4-2-3-1 formation. Ahmed Hegazi continues to keep his place in the side, but with Nyom and, potentially, Gareth McAuley, options in defence, the Egyptian remains at risk. Pulis has plenty of midfield options, with Livermore and James Morrison possible starters. Hal Robson-Kanu remains the back-up option to Rodriguez and Rondon in attack.

Current Status: Slightly Unsettled
Risk Areas: Defence, central midfield

West Ham United

Starting XI: Hart; Zabaleta, Fonte, Reid, Cresswell; Kouyate, Noble (Lanzini 62); Antonio, Chicharito (Sakho 78), Ayew (Masuaku 78); Carroll. Subs not used: Adrian, Byram, Ogbonna, Rice.

  • What we saw: Having been favouring a 3-4-3 formation of late, Slaven Bilic switched to a 4-2-3-1 system for the home encounter with Swansea. With the match at 0-0, the Hammers boss brought on the fit-again Manuel Lanzini for Mark Noble in central midfield, while Arthur Masuaku operated out of position on the left wing in place of Ayew.
  • What we learned: The change of formation eventually paid dividends for Bilic, but there remains uncertainty over which system he’ll favour. In a 4-2-3-1, it’s difficult to get the best out of both Carroll and Chicharito. But it does allow Antonio, Lanzini and Marko Arnautovic – who missed out due to illness last weekend – to start in the attacking midfield positions. Ayew and Diafra Sakho provide other attacking alternatives, while Masuaku has impressed in a couple of matches coming on as a left winger. Bilic has so far, at least, been reluctant to use a 4-4-2, though that may have been influenced by the number of injuries he’s had to deal with. In a back four, it’s likely that Angelo Ogbonna will continue to miss out.

Current Status: Fairly Settled
Risk Areas: Flanks, attacking midfield, forwards

1,313 Comments Post a Comment
  1. FER FUSCH AKE
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    between sterling, sane and Silva who is the ultimate differential in the next 3 gwks?

    1. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Sterling, but his finishing is poor

    2. JJO
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      The 1 that has the lowest ownership?

    3. Pranav Santhosh
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      sterling

    4. *sigh*
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Sane

      1. FER FUSCH AKE
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        thanks guys. sane it is

  2. KanteTouchThis
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Hi there, just need a quick rule clarification.
    I had one free transfer. Decided to make to transfer for a - 4 hit. Saved and confirmed.

    Now I'm thinking of using free hit instead. Will those 2 transfers and hit be part of the free hit and nullified (hence not being permanent) if I decided to use it. Or that's done and I will get the hit regardless.

    Any help is appreciated. Thanks

    1. KanteTouchThis
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Two* transfers

    2. Team Cruel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Transfers are reset. No hits.

    3. Bruno Bruno!!
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      if you use youre free hit chip the hit you have already taken wont be counted and therefore you will not have -4 points

    4. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      From what I've read of other people doing this, the transfers you have made will remain, as will the -4.

      Haven't personally tried it, nor have the other repliers I'd assume.

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        This is incorrect

        1. Respect My Authoritah
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          Aye, just read your post.

          Just going by what other posters have experienced. But yeah, seems pretty clear that from FPL

        2. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          Speak of the devil and he shall appear 😉

    5. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Search hot topics, Wild Rover posted one about this.

      After next GW, whole team will revert back to the one before you made any transfers. no hits taken

    6. Oven Glover
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Hi TFF,

      None of the players you sign during your Free Hit Gameweek (before or after you activate the Free Hit chip) will remain in your team when the deadline passes, and your team will revert to the previous line-up.

      You should find that the TC column for the Gameweek in question on your 'View Gameweek history' page displays a 0, indicating that you weren't deducted any points when playing your Free Hit.

      Please also note that when playing the Free Hit chip, any saved free transfers will be lost, and you will be back down to one free transfer for the next GW.

      Regards,
      Fantasy Premier League Support

      1. Oven Glover
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Direct answer from FPL support when I asked them.

        1. Earn your Spurs
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          So you would get the same players but at their new value if they've risen or fallen in the meantime? And money itb unchanged

          1. Oven Glover
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 7 months ago

            Yes

    7. KanteTouchThis
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Thanks for the update everyone. This might fix an impulse buy gone wrong. Although I will lose my chip in the process

    8. Vratislaviensis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Free Hit like Wildcard overrules any transfers and hits made during the week - before and after chip. No hit point deducted but also these two players you bought will go after the GW is completed and the one you "sold" before chip will be back in your team so be careful.

  3. LosBlancos
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Morata hold and captain
    Could the insanity lay off?

    1. Obi-1 Kenobi-0
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      He's been diagnosed with a grade 2 hamstring injury which can take between 4-8 weeks to recover from. Not reported - it's been confirmed.

      You can captain him if you want, but make sure you choose a good VC.

      1. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Will know at the pressie, I can sell now at 10.2 tho, if I wait I'll lose .1
        The thing giving me hope is the twitter post on last page saying that the injury wasn't translated accordingly and he could be ready for CPA, and even if injured I'd want him back as soon as fit so in a dillema
        Atm the other option is Mkhi+Morata>Sterling+Jesus

  4. Malkmus
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    A'noon all. I can get to this with a -8 and 0.0 ITB. Any thoughts? Obviously def is risky but 5th def rarely plays

    Foster-Elliot

    Bavies - Naughton - Mee - Mbemba - 3.9
    Couts - Eriksen - Richarlison - Sterling - Tarrol
    Luka - Vardy - Kane

    Ta !

    1. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      depends on what was before really

      1. Malkmus
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        It's:
        chica to vardy
        mikhi to sterling
        salah to couts
        hegazi to 3.9

        Squeezing value to try and cover all bases really

  5. Nesvy
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Thoughts on my WC?

    Fabianski - Elliot
    Azpi - Otamendi - Davies - Cedric - 4.0
    Silva - Salah - Richarlison/Shaqiri - 4.5 - 4.4
    Kane - Jesus - Vardy

    1. grumpyman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Very template. That's not a criticism either.

    2. jam
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Prefer Coutinho to Salah
      And Pope or Gomez to Fabs. probably because I have Fabs...

  6. Bruno Bruno!!
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    What to do with this team?

    Will hold Morata until chelsea press conference

    Forster
    Bertrand Alderweireld Mee Maguire
    Richarlison Eriksen Gross
    Kane Morata Lukaku

    Elliot Atsu Carroll Hegazi

    2FT, 0.2m itb

    1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      If Morata is out then him to Vardy and Atsu to City if fund stretch.

  7. DeathoftheParty
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Will Conte put faith in Bats now Morata done til November?

  8. cheeky_ash
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    REPOST - According to sources Morata will be out for 4-8 weeks
    =================================================

    Having taken -4pt already to get Jesus in for Firminho - now Morata is injured....one of my forwards...

    I think he will lose 0.3M over the international break so I may have to act...sadly I do not own Kane or Lukaku...Currently my forward line is:-

    Laca Morata Jesus....so would you:-

    A: Stick (0pts)
    B: Morata -> Vardy (-4pts)
    C: Morata -> Batshuayi (-4pts)
    D: Morata -> Vardy/Batshuayi , Laca -> Kane (-8pts)

    Thanks

    1. *sigh*
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      A

    2. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Wait. You've already taken a -4 hit and been burned by an injury

    3. Fpldonny
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Aaah the perils of the early transfer! You may aswell holfld and hope he recovers faster than anticipated.

  9. Tim Canterbury
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Maybe the injury's the reason Lukaku's been so non-existent of late

  10. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Kola, Mkhi, Jesus TO Alonso, Hazard, Joselu -8 mini WC?

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Absolutely not. Mkhi v Liverpool looks good, Jesus v Stoke is one of the best options around this week.

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Cheers! So Hazard & Alonso aren't utterly essential versus Woy's boys?

        1. Respect My Authoritah
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          Well, they're certainly terrific options. As with every transfer, the player you're selling are just as important as those you're buying.

          1. BPlease
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 7 months ago

            FPL wisdom right here.

            That everytime you sell someone and immediately the following GW, he goes on a scoring spree.

    2. *sigh*
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Definitely not in my opinion

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Thanks!

    3. DAZZ
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Daft. No need go get rid of Kola, and Jesus has 2 corkers at home?

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Alonso & Haz could go huge versus CPA

        1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          That's one match...

          1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 7 months ago

            I'd expect that sort of answer from a non-member. Check the season ticker...

            1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 7 months ago

              Seriously? You sound like Waxys

              I can read, I know Chelsea have great fixtures. But so do City. At the moment neither Alonso nor Hazard have demonstrated that they're worth the extra over slightly cheaper alternatives

              1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
                • 8 Years
                6 years, 7 months ago

                Soz but you gave a very closed answer........I replied to your comment not your intent - Say what you mean.

                1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 7 months ago

                  I was replying to your "could go huge vs CPA"...

                  I wouldn't do it, think Jesus to Joselu is too big a downgrade to justify the difference between the others.

                  I think the response is pretty resounding, but do what you want really - it's you team!

                  1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
                    • 8 Years
                    6 years, 7 months ago

                    Agreed it's clear, I'll see who I can shoehorn in with a draft Wildcard. Cheers.

                    Lol I got banned for a month for abusing him *facepalm*

                    1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
                      • 6 Years
                      6 years, 7 months ago

                      Aye fair enough. Ouch - I tended to keep out of it, found him quite amusing 🙂

                      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
                        • 8 Years
                        6 years, 7 months ago

                        Yo Klopp -
                        Mkhi Salah Cedric/Cresswell to Hazard Sterling Fodder?

                      2. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
                        • 6 Years
                        6 years, 7 months ago

                        Seems solid enough 🙂 Not sure about fodder on a WC but then I guess if it's your 3rd sub probably worth it!

                        I'm keeping Salah for now myself, but then I'm quite stubborn!

                      3. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
                        • 6 Years
                        6 years, 7 months ago

                        Replied just below, messed up

              2. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
                • 8 Years
                6 years, 7 months ago

                Did he get banned or crawl back under his rock, by the way?

                1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 7 months ago

                  Think banned?

    4. Annie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Kola and Jesus out, crazy.

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Alonso & Hazard in, not crazy?

        1. Annie
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          I think at least wait till City have played Stoke and Arsenal have played Watford. Kola and Jesus could easily outscore the Chelsea players in that week, let alone with an 8 point head start.

          1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 7 months ago

            Are you not seeing a huge Chelski mauling? I see Watford scoring (arsenal keeping 1 CS in next 5). Of course Jesus is great but having Silva is still good right? Allowing Chelsea players. I know coverage is BS but...

            Current/desired:
            City: 1/2
            Chelsea: 0/2
            United: 2/1
            Spurs: 2/2
            Pool: 1/1

            Impossible to achieve desired per team so something has to give.

            1. Annie
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              6 years, 7 months ago

              I'd rather have 2 City and 1 Chelsea than the other way round. I guess that's why this season is interesting.

    5. ROOTY7
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      God no

    6. jam
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Yes if you have a higher rank than me.

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        I do, so yes.

        1. jam
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          Good luck

    7. Fpldonny
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Not worth the -8 anyway and shipping jesus given their upcoming fixtures will hurt you imo

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Thanks mate - Managed to keep Jesus, double up on City attack and get Hazard! Think I'm happy!

    8. Salarrivederci
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Well.

      I am gonna try to argue around above suggested transfer.

      I guess alot of managers have had several Spurs/United players due to their early fixtures.
      The result was, that many had to 'ignore' alot of the assets from Pool/City/Chelsea.

      After the City win against Chelsea and the big City wins the weeks before people are now getting rid of Mkhi/Eriksen/Salah/Firmino/Alli/Bailly and so on (but ofcause mostly due to the change in fixtures) That however, still results in a choice between City and Chelsea (unless you are on WC). Since many sticks with Lukaku/Kane it's hard to free up enough funds to cover both City and Chelsea unless you take -12 or -16.

      City just seems to be scoring more goals, and therefore you will run into sceptisicm choosing Hazard/Alonso/Josulu over Jesus/Sterling/Mee as an example.

      I like the idea of going Chelsea > City, but personally i would rather have attacking City assets and no Chelsea than the other way around.

      Hazard is a good shout! Good fixtures, hungry to show off, and only owned by mere 3,5% Silva will soon reach 25% and then what happens when he makes an assist or blanks? You simply stay where you are in the table with the 'mirror image' team which looks just like all your opponents.

      With that said I just think people is jumping on the prise rises like mad men. United and Spurs got good fixtures! Jones is a BPS magnet, Lukaku scores every game, Mkhitaryan has delivered his fair share so far - has he not? Pool can't defend - Moreno is on the pitch for Gods sake. Spurs with Bournemouth (H)? Eriksen off? Not (C) Kane due to Wembley factor, and investing alot bringing in another expensive striker to captain? Kane might net 3 times?! We don't know.

      But then again - those of us with triple Spurs and United and no WC can't really invest (more) in Chelsea/City without letting someone go..

      Go for it m8!

      1. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Nice arguments thanks! Double/Treble ups don't seem to exist this year haha especially now that UTDs fixtures drop off!

        I have my doubts over hazard but he should be fire and forget with the fixtures

      2. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        I'm 0.1 off this (hoping Alonso falls soon):

        Elliot 4.0
        Alonso Kola Bavies Cedric Naughton
        Hazard Silva Choupa Tarrol RLC
        Kane Kaku Chica

        Think losing Jesus for Chica and sticking with a mid-priced third striker or going down the Joselu route is my only option to achieve big hitter coverage.

      3. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Managed to keep Jesus, double up on City attack and fit Hazard in while keeping Kola (set to price drop though). Alonso will have to wait.

  11. thomashl
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    On a WC:

    Mkhi/Salah to Silva/Cout?

    Coutinho's influence just can't be ignored, it seems

    1. J T
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Silva&Courtinho easy.

      1. thomashl
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Cheers!

  12. 824545201
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Lukaku or Hazard seems to be the main wildcard conundrum now that Morata is injured. Is Lukaku's decent form worth it over Hazard's very tasty fixtures?

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Getting both myself. Prefer Hazard a little

  13. LewanGOALski
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Fabianski - Elliot
    Azpilicueta - Otamendi - BDavies - Cedric - 4.0
    ___ - ____ - Richarlison - Choupo-Moting - 4.4
    Kane - Jesus - Vardy

    for the missing spots:

    A) Mane & Sterling
    or
    B) Coutinho & D.Silva

    ?

  14. shearer9
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Why are people selling Morata, Mkhi, Firmino etc so soon? I know TV is important but the risk of picking up injuries over the international break is so high. I'm likely to lose about 0.3 over this gameweek but it's worth it.

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Risk/reward etc etc

    2. Goat
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Leave them off. I can't understand either and never will

    3. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Is it?

    4. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Not worth selling early in my opinion. Imagine if Morata smashed a hatrick vs Palace

      1. Respect My Authoritah
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        That'd still be a nightmare if you sold late 😉

    5. Wild Rover
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      In the case of Morata it's a fair gamble, keeping/increasing value whilst selling a player who is confirmed injured for a player who has a chance of getting injured

      1. Numb
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Could be drunk transfers as well?

        1. Wild Rover
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          I resemble that remark!

    6. HashAttack
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      I did Morata > Jesus last night ... really had no option due to price movements
      I've still got 0.1ITB, so if Morata has some miracle cure, there is the option of Laca > Morata

      It's very pessimistic to think any risk is only limited to a player you bring in ... and when you "know" the player you are moving out is injured that is seems to me that at worst you would end up in the same position

      I've some comfort in that I have two good enough subs (Gross / Richarlison) should Jesus actually end up injured

      BTW: If you can find a way of transferring me your 0.3M, I will arrange for 10 points going back the other way

  15. KnightSlayer
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    DEAD teams

    I like my team as it is . so I may be burning a transfer if no injuries during international break.
    I don't want people to think I have a Dead team

    Do you consider a dead team a team that does not make any transfers?

    If none of your players get injured then it possible you never have to make any.

    1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Does it matter?

    2. HashAttack
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      If you have Ibra and Kun up front with Pogba in midfield then your team is officially dead

  16. Emiliano Sala
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Why are people selling kolasinac? 😐

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      To get Davies I'd assume. And for funds for Kane?

    2. Maddamotha
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Because there are better options and Arsenal's fixtures dont look great? I think Watford will score, Everton are awful but they gotta improve, dont they? Im kinda keen on Kola > City def myself

    3. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Why pay more when you can get Monreal for less

  17. Demel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    So from too many options to injuries forcing everyone to have a strike force of..

    Vardy - Kane - Jesus

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Pretty much. Or Lukaku over Vardy/Jesus

    2. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      I have Jesus - Kane - Lukaku

      1. Yellin' in my Ear
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Ditto

    3. Dybala10
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      yep

  18. Arfaish
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Would you wildcard? Was planning to before Morata injury but now not sure:

    Elliot - Foster
    Davies - Bertrand - Cedric - 3.9 - 3.9
    Alli - DSilva - Myki - SDavis -Carroll
    Kane - Lukaku - Chica

    The team isn't a mess but there are a few under performers at this point. Thoughts?

    1. AllanM
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      If that was my team I'd WC

      1. Arfaish
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Wildcard team would be:

        Elliot - Pope
        Davies - Otamendi - Trippier - Ward - 4m
        Haz - Silva - Cout - Shaqiri
        Kane - Jesus - Joselu

        Could do Tripps to Monreal but I reckon Trippier has done enough to keep his place IMO

  19. arndff_
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Wanna do Mkhi to a City mid.
    D Silva's going to rise tonight.
    Shall I buy him for that reason?

    1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Yep. Pull the trigger.

      1. arndff_
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Are you in the same boat?

  20. ROOTY7
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Ritchie/GroB+ Morata--> Silva+Jesus

    Worth -4?

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Yeah, probably

    2. jam
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      i think it might be

  21. Maddamotha
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Kola > City defender?

    1. Jimjam
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      For a FT, I'd do it

      1. Maddamotha
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Yeah what ive been thinking all along, but people on here think its crazy! Oh why I read this forums at times..

    2. The UnderAcheivers
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Kola is almost just as likely to get a CS in the next three as a man city defender. Also has more attacking threat. Would probably hold Kola for the next three

  22. Jimjam
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    A) Luiz, Silva, Jesus

    B) Maguire, Sterling, Lukaku

    1. jam
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      a

  23. Tiote on Peyote
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    A little further questioning regarding the free hit chip.

    If you were to take a -4 early in the week and catch a couple of price rises and them you were to play the free hit chip later in the week do you retain the value gained?

    Similarly, if you were to play the free hit chip early in the week what happens the value you gain and the value of your original team?

    Thanks.

    1. Wild Rover
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      You only get the changes on your original 15

      1. Tiote on Peyote
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Definitive. Thanks man.

    2. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Based on the FPL replies, your original team rises and falls with the market. No value gained/lost from transfers made are retained.

  24. 2hotty
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    got 2 free transfers thinking atsu kola to luiz and fellani him being my 4th mid im playinng 442 any thoughts

    1. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Formatting 0

  25. arndff_
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    2FTs, 0.4ITB. Just Mkhi to a City mid is fine, right?

    DDG
    Otamendi Monreal Naughton
    Eriksen Salah Mkhi Atsu
    Kane(C) Lukaku(VC) Abraham

    Elliot Dawson TCarroll Long

    1. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Yes, for now. But don't worry one of your players will get injured sooner or later.

      1. arndff_
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        "Good" luck to you, too. 🙂

  26. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Please rate this WC early draft squad. Would it be better with Coutinho Azpilicueta over Hazard and Cedric?

    Fabianski Elliot
    Cedric Maguire Monreal Davies Ward
    Hazard Sterling Richarlison Choupo-Moting Carroll
    Kane Vardy Jesus

  27. FER FUSCH AKE
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    I've noted that over 85% of RMT here have sterling and Silva while completely ignoring sane, why is that? Tempted to go sane as he is quite explosive.

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Similar to Sterling but Sterling is cheaper.
      Silva more nailed.

  28. Pep says
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    My WC opportunities

    8 changes, standing to gain around 1m in TV between risers and fallers. Worth hitting the button?

    1. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Sounds like you've convinced yourself

      1. Pep says
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Does doesn't it

    2. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      Really does depend on the specifics of the players/changes. Missed a good few rises already too

      1. Pep says
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Ya but Jesus is only at his original price now. King and Ward are the other 2 so do I just bite the bullet and accept my mistake.

    3. badgerboy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      1 million? Really?

      1. Pep says
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Well, over the next 2 weeks, Azpi, Jesus, Silva, Sterling, Coutinho, Fabianski may all rise. Dawson, Hennessey likely to drop. That's 0.8m and hoping Choup will rise in the meantime so I can cash in on the 0.1m

        1. badgerboy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 7 months ago

          Fair enough. Thought you were talking about profit trading on your wildcard. Ignore me.

  29. pundit of punts
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    Which set of fixtures look better?

    A. eve,SWA,new,HUD,swa,BUR,SOT,cry
    B. BUR,wba,ARS,lei,hud,SOT,WHM,mun

    1. Sailboats
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      A

    2. Over Midwicket
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      A by a country mile. Dem fixtures.

    3. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      A

  30. arndff_
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 7 months ago

    A) Lukaku to Jesus
    B) Mkhi to Silva

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      B

      1. arndff_
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 7 months ago

        Thanks

    2. Ode
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 7 months ago

      B