The Scoreboard presents the Fantasy Premier League information you need from the day’s matches all on one screen, including the current top five BPS (Bonus Point System) standings from each match (potential Bonus Point earners are in bold). Actual Bonus Points will be shown when added – all points are provisional until then.
Do you have Silva/Aguero and or Sterling/Sturridge for their fixtures?
I have Silva and Aguero, no Liverpool cover though
He's enough if you like red arrows 😉
45pts behind the top 10K
Since GW8 I have had a high of 24K and a low of 59K..currently at 32K.In other words I've gone nowhere in 20 weeks. Consistency is keeping me top in an average mini league, but what is that extra that I'm missing? Advice pls...Getting the captain right more often and benching the right players are 2 things which are more down to luck than anything...
Getting the right captain is no more lucky than choosing your strikers imo
Captain score as % of your highest possible captain score 52.00%
Just need the odd differential here and there. One that's scoring of course.....always the problem 🙂
Example no 1: Walcott killing it tonight. 1% ownership.
Aguero (c) too is still less than 30% ownership...Still low maybe but will have a huge ownership in he higher ranks where people are actively playing
Yep, gotcha there.
Balls 😉
10 weeks left. Challenge accepted.
Dier a decent shout for gwk 28?
Not convinced.
I don't think so.
Not if Walker plays.
Hasn't Dier been playing centre half?
He has? I don't watch Spurs. Guess I may have to look into that.
Certainly has the last 3 league games looking at FPL
Think so. Fazio a potential problem though
Moves up 200,000 places in 5 weeks. 😀
Very nice. What are you ranked at the moment?
40k with 4 including captain to play. Hopefully another rise, tonight.
What's the target then for this season?
10k, hopefully.
Aim higher.
What should I be looking at?
I'm after 1K & was 36K not long ago.
Definitely achievable. Good luck
Nicely done.
Cheers.
"Meteoric" as OPTA might say
🙂
Nicely. Well on my way to my 3k target for the season.
*Nicely done that is.
Thanks, Muppet. You're flying high there, mate. First year of FPL.
Yeah, cheers. Keep it up.
I can't get onto fffix. Is foster due to rise tonight?
Nope. Maybe tomorrow.
Not even close then?
92% so relatively close. I think he'll rise before next GW.
93.2% on FPL statistics. Can't get on FFF either.
92.5 on fff.
no, NTI very slow. Everyone is too busy bringing back the players they got rid of 3 days ago
*This morning
Ok thanks all
I have convinced myself into Giroud --> Austin.
Now the major problem will be convincing myself to take Eriksen over Sterling. Both players are troll players for me, and whoever I don't have performs. 😀
I want Eriksen for the DGW but not a moment after that.You have convinced yourself without even seeing Arsenal play tomorrow?
Smart...Yep. I already have Sanchez and Kos.
^Eriksen
Eriksen
Argh, it's not writing anything beyond the left arrow (< after ----).
I mean Sterling --> Eriksen is the second FT.
Spurs clean sheet odds for Swansea is 7/5 and I would guess somewhat the same for the QPR game. This would suggest a defender/Lloris should be good value?
I think so. Fixtures are okay after the double too
Indeed. Just unsure if anyone else than Lloris is safe from rotation
Rose if he doesn't stat tomorrow otherwise vert and walker should be good
Gotta pick the one who will play both. I still think that they have at best one clean sheet in those two games, and I don't really think they will keep a clean in either. Lots of great fixtures for other teams in GW28, I will happily go without a Spud defender.
By having one you put yourself in the position of getting 2 clean sheets (+ other potential attacking returns), so I guess having one would be the favourable decision, as also suggested by the odds. Lloris + Eriksen + Kane would be desirable am I right?
Too much poker on the brain. 😛
Haha.. Might be
Getting Lloris is desirable, sure, but lot's of other factors to consider whether or not it's worth it to get him in. And also if you like to plump for a GK.
Rose then? If he gets through tomorrow.. Seems like Ben Davies is quite out of favor, and even more after the performance against Fiorentina. After the game tomorrow PL will be Spurs only focus aswell.
Vertonghen or bust, I think. Again, I'm staying well clear, but I think he has by far the best chance of any of their back four of starting both games. Walker is nailed to a post but it's a big ask of any fullback to play three games in such short succession.
True enough, thanks for the insight!
What to do with Cisse? Terrible fixtures but the dude is a goal machine.
Straight out, no question about it.
I love you for this answer, Walsh.
😉
Time to move on. He worked as a one week punt, which was his purpose, now time to bring in Austin/Kane.
Yeah. Giroud better get his act together tomorrow though.
One week punt that worked. End of
All hinges on Giroud tomorrow.
lol ask your question TOMORROW then!? 😉
His goals per minute ratio is ridiculous though. Worth discussing the merits I think.
ADM & Cazorla > Silva & Eriksen (-4)
YAY or NAY?
Just Adm to erik
Top 10k ownership of remaining players:
Ospina - 5.8%
Bellerin - 33%
Koscielny - 13.4%
Monreal - 3.8%
Sanchez - 60.2%
Cazorla - 50.8%
Ozil - 10%
Walcott - 5.1%
Giroud - 44.7%
Clichy - 10.8%
Kompany - 3.6%
Silva - 61.6%
Yaya - 2.8%
Aguero - 93.3%
Moreno - 6.6%
Skrtel - 2.5%
Sterling - 17.6%
Coutinho - 2.5%
Sturridge - 3.8%
Stay quiet Caz & Giroud!*and Walcott 😀
You're an evil man Walsh!
I jest. Best of luck tomorrow mate. I love a bold captaincy pick as much as the next guy and I hope it pays off for you.
Thanks mate. Good call on Cisse btw.
I admire your balls Innsie. I bottled it and sold the little blighter.
Well at least one of us will be happy! 🙂
Sounds fair to me 😀
😆
Wonder who the teams with Aguero have instead
luck
Giroud and bellerin dropped would be nice. Need Silva to do nothing. Go Liverpool
Ta
Aguero and Sanchez blanks. Bellerin firmly on the bench.
I'm laughing.Silva and Giroud blank will do nicely.
That would be good. Plus an Everton goal would be nice for me 🙂
Captaincy:
Aguero - 51.4%
Sanchez - 20.4%
Cazorla - 3.8%
Giroud - 3.5%
With a special mention to...
Walcott - 0.2% 😉love those 20 people!
Love you too 😉
hehe didn't spot that, you're the best Innsie. And it's coincided with your first green in a while!
Let's just hope that green remains tomorrow 🙂
Ozil & Walcott my big differentials there!
With Bellerin, Silva, Sterling, Walcott, Giroud and Aguero(c) I'm feeling pretty good after yesterday.
Stacked
Hmm. My ozil (c), wally, kosch trio could bea serious differential if they repeat 2 weeks ago
Does rank matter to you or is winning mini leagues enough?
They seem to go hand in hand.
Sort of yeah. But for example sometimes I will make transfers based on other mini leaguers despite what it might do to my overall rank.
Also, I mean do you care about finishing 100k+ as long as you win leagues?Yeah I mean I guess I really don't know 😀 I just take it one GW at a time and do what feels right and fun.
They coincide, imo. If you win your ML, you'll end up with a decent rank.
I like to think it's a combination of the two there Andy.
It is. But for example the first time I played FPL I led my Ml by 100 going into the end of the season. Started taking 8 point hits for fun with no care for rank
Rank is everything. ML's are mere trifles, trinkets if you like, that are cast aside and soon forgot. Rank is tattoed on your arse and says Dave if you're not in the top 10k.
All about rank
Not for me. As long as I win my mini leagues I don't care about rank. If you're not no.1 you're last 🙂
Money Leagues for me. competitve league so usually means good rank aswell
Focus more on rank myself. Don't care what anyone else does in my ML really.
Only ML.
$ involved
Exactly.
Win FPL & you win both. 😉
Now that would be nice.
Mini-League for me. Got ~ 150 points to play with so shooting for the moon/burning my rank at the moment
Rank primarily. But I do like retaining my mini league trophy year after year
ML..I remember last season where I have not much chance getting 1st with 1 match left while my rival behind was quite close to me , I record his tv and cash itb and try to predict his transfer , and then try to 'neutralise' any potential differential from his side..and glad it worked out I maintained my 2nd .
Is any1 tempted to go without Eriksen not sure will play both. (Got Kane/Rose)
and rather than Moses to Eriksen tempted by Giroud to CostaChadli's been tempting but I picked up Eriksen
Im happy with Rose/Kane and to get Costa back.
Must admit if was going for a Spurs Midfielder would pick Eriksen over Chadli
England might win another game of cricket 😯
Go England! Hitting form before the big games 🙂
now now, Sanga hasn't even started yet
Expecting 600+ tbh.
That is a big might.
How come we automatically qualify for everything? Is it because we invented it?
UAE is even in the WC
We're seeded 1st because the ICC set the seedings in stone in 2012 when we were conveniently good lol
What happened?
to England? Players got found out/ we stopped playing at home so much/ KP left / Flower got cosy
Not sure they have enough runs. If the SL top order fire I can see them getting home. Should be a good second innings.
Lakmal banned from bowling 😆
Night all. See you for more fun and games tomorrow
I think I might sell Kane and have no DGW players to be a true differential
😆 I sold him 4 weeks ago, for the love of God, save yourself!!
Risers: Sanchez, Sterling, Coutinho, Rooney, C. Dawson, ADM, D.P. Cisse
Fallers: Terry, Kane, Berahino, Cissokho, Vardy, Yedlin, UlloaTerry and Kane 🙁
Kane. Get in.
Hazard didn't fall 🙁
he fell yesterday
On -113% at fplstat
At least Rose didn't rise either 😛
I took Rose in as had exact money and thot was rising.
got a terrible feeling now 🙁
Ta
🙁 Some 1 told me Rose was rising so transferd in as exact money.
But not get injured 2morowbetter
I hope he doesn't for your sake. A week longs yellow flag would be depressing.
How does ADM rise after today with those fixtures to come?
People bought for blank GW.
and with a 45min "solid" performance against sunderland hahas
ADM 😆
is fplstats not right tonight? it doesn't match up to what you have...
Rose to rise and Haz to fall is all it hasThese are the changes that have already happened. FPL stats got Sanchez, Sterling, Terry and Kane right and was moderately close with a couple of others I think (Dawson was in the 90s). Their calculations are not 100% spot on and they're currently over/underestimating a few. This might be wildcard related.
+0.1 SV on ADM 😀 😆
What is the definition of a sport? There are lots of pastimes which masquerade as sports but can gymnastics say really be classed as a sport and if so how about figure skating? Where does one begin and one end?
I think it's technically "competitive physical activity with entertainment value".
My own personal view is that the competitors have to be able to impact directly on the performance of the oppositionSo this counts figure skating as a sport. Personally I believe there should be certaintay with a sport. Anything where a judging panel is involved introduces peoples opinions and I don't believe it should be.
Your suggestion would rule out most of athletics so although I agree impacting upon each other really that is what makes the sports entertaining.So triathlon?
A game that requires physical exertion. So yeah Id call Gymnastics and skating sports.
How about ballroom dancing. Surely that isn't but fits the criteria
yeah I'd give it. More sporty than darts, which requires dexterity but not exertion.
I'd consider one as sport if it requires certain amount of physicality and skills . So , snooker/bowling/golf is never quite a sport to me . Gymnastic is a tough sport to pick up imo .
I think they are all sports. The fat boys never do so well as the thinner ones
Darts
It's all relative. That's tremendous physical activity for those fat bar stewards
Darts is kinda like javelin, with smaller javelins.
Why define it? if its considered a sport then its a sport.
But some people consider one thing as a sport and others don't
I would side with those who consider a certain sport a sport. Those who disagree are simply wrong and are perhaps discriminating against a said sport. A lack of understanding and appreciation is usually to blame.
e-sports? to me they'll always be computer games, not e-sports.
I agree.
Apart from Daley Thompsons Decathalon
an e-sport isn't technically a sport though is it? its an e-sport, perhaps thats different, it certainly sounds different, after all, it has an e in it.
Ah. But there you go. If i say it is, by your rule, you are wrong here.
You cant think its only opinion then say if my opinion is Fifa is akin to real football then Im wrong.I think its reasonable to suggest there is a difference between sport and e-sport.
a LOT of people consider a sport, 40,000 people went to watch a game live in Seoul:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29684635But do they call it 'sport' ?
He just said they do
They call it e-sport, thats not 'sport'
No different from "motor" sport or "equestrian" sport
Perhaps. If it is defined as 'motor' sport then its deliberately defined and put into a separate category as regular sport. So then it is different.
In fact ... Why isnt "e" sport real sport?
I say cause sitting on ones arse at a computer isnt exercise as below.
You say my reasoning is crap. So if i consider e sport sport, tell me why its not?So same applies to "e" sport then?
e-sport is not a sport, if it was, it wouldn't have an e in it.
Motor sport is not a sport if it defines itself as 'motor sport' (I'm not sure if thats always the case)
My roommate at uni last year did without batting an eyelid
One person cannnot make a definition on his own. It needs to be a universal name. In this case its e-sport. That is not 'sport'.
they'd say e-sports are a subset of sports. Much the way ball sports are a subset of sports.
See my response below
Cos we can't all be mavericks, some of us need rules
Not everything needs to be conveniently boxed into a certain set of rules. Why restrict yourself?
Freedom is scary, look what happened to William Wallace
To me a sport should require physical demands at least.
So there should be an aspectwhere being faster, stronger, better stamina etc is an advantage. Hence. Snooker is not a sport.
Similarly, a sport should require human physicality primarily as oposed to machines etc. So tour de france where the man powers bike and bikes all quitesimilar. Thats sport. Whereas moto gp where engine and fuel power bike and bikes basicallymatter a lot, nlta sport.
Being male and aged around 20-35 should also be a natural advantage. If there is no reason a woman or an old man isnt on average at a natural disadvantage against a 25 year old man, then not a sport. So, darts, not a sport.
Also, animal based stuff like showjumping, horse racing etc. Where, like a motor bike, the horse powers things and matters loads and also jokeys can be 50 and still win, not a sport. Only sport to the animal those ones.
Skill aspect matters far less than fitness and physical aspect. Obviously there has to be competition whether individual or team but the key for a sport is basically the physical side. If i jog 10 miles, I beat a fat guy and Im out of breath. If i drive 10 miles, he might be faster and none of us break sweat. Driving is never sport. Ever.
Standing still like golf. Not a sport. Not really. Tom watson lead the open after 3 days about 9 years ago aged about 65. Thats a 95% technique and skill game. Very little is fitness or speed or stamina or strength. The fact john daly can win theopen, that makes golf not a sport.
Sliding down a hill on ice. Skill yes, sport no. Why? Skill, nothing else. Same with jumping into water from a board. Not a sport. Syncronised swimming? Not sport. Archery? Big darts, not sport. Dressage? Dancing horses? Not even a sport to the horse.
Sports are things like all running events, all cycling events, swimming races, games like football, basketball, rugby (games where speed, stamina etc matter).😆 this is a load of shyte.
and your defeating your own angument above isnt?
Clearly you "dont understand" e-sports
I understand that e-sport and sport isn't the same thing
Why though? I consider FPL sport. Why would it not be?
I consider speed reading a sport. So therefore it must be surely?Any wacko and make their own definitions. But its all relative, you need a bit more support than yourself and a very small minority of wackos to determine speed reading a sport. It needs to be more universal than that.
*can
But you said above to discriminate against a said sport is wrong and means lack of understanding. All sports have to start somewhere. Now your deciding where. Your applying a rule on numbers of wackos. Rules means there are reasons some arent sports. Hence my big post. You can have it both ways ryan. Come on. Admit dressage isnt a sport.
Which it isn't. Yet horse racing is in my opinion
I'm not deciding anything. If something is universally called a sport then its a sport. If something is universally called an e-sport then its an e-sport. If something is universally called 'motor-sport' then its motor-sport.
They each have their own name and each is therefore different from each other.
Sport
E-Sport
Motor Sport
I think if its called something different from 'sport' then by its very own name, it is not a sport. This is a very simple concept.Where do Ball Sports fit in?
I think e sports and motors sports are subsections of sport like field sports or water sports and are therefore varieties of sport rather than not sports
Thats a bit vague.
water sports, field sports, ball sports
This is not a thing. This is a very broad and vague concept. Completely irrelevant as they each include multiple 'sports'sports that are very different from each other such as rugby and football. Each a sport in their own right
Okay sport is the header. Think it safe to say there are different types of sport. I think you would agree that these sections of sports could have names such as athletics which then encompasses a whole range of track and field events. Why would motor sports or e sports not be a subsection such as this therefore coming under the umbrella of sport?
Because commonly they are considered a collective. Go back to the concept of 'Universal naming'
Universally Rugby and Football are completely different sports in their own right
E-sports is commonly known as a collective on its own
Motor Sport is the same I think.As a tie breaker this is what Wikipedia believes is a sport. Don't agree with som of them though but maybe just anything is a port inc those ones
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sportsI might take up speedcubing
But Snooker is a sport
If it is called a 'sport' then it is a sport.
Australians are known to call people "sport" yet they are not sports. Unless you are playing the game of life that is
Is suspect the meaning of that particular type of sport is quite different. Many words have multiple meanings.
Like Reading and reading you mean? or doing and doing?
How about a Jeep Cherokee Sport?
A fair point
See above. That is a name, a noun if you like
Sorry. Just being a bit mischievous. 🙂
I don't agree but the response amuses me. Have a plus 1
Highlights the problems of trying to define such a broad concept.
I dispute that any event where you wouldn't notice if the competitors are there are not are sports. I remove Golf any form of running, swimming or cycling from the sport list as not competitive enough for my liking
Can't sleep and loggedon and just read this thread.....very entertaining i must say. Are you really saying cycling isnt a sport Cheesoid? 😯
*logged on
Cycling would be no different if you were the only one doing it. Same with any running event. Therefore pointless and not a sport. Golf you don't even play at the same time as the other people and is not a sport.
You are of course entitled to your opinion buddy but anyone that watched yesterdays Omloop Het Nieuwsblad and Ian Stanard's incredible victory in the opening race of this seasons one day classics could never say cycling isnt a sport. But each to their own of course 😛
And the Tour de France is unquestionably the biggest annual sporting event in the world and most certainly is a sport imo. 😉
not a sport. You could do that by yourself
Absolute nonsense mate tbh but like i said your entitled to your opinion. 🙂
I am mostly winding up as I am sure you are aware
😆
Is competitive eating a sport?
Best move here DZ?
A) ADM -> Eriksen
B) Foster & ADM -> Lloris & Eriksen (4 points)
C) Haidara & ADM -> Rose & Eriksen (4 points)
D) Clichy, ADM & Ayoze -> Rose, Eriksen & Austin (8 points)
Foster
Berty, Clichy, Bellerin
Sanchez, Hazard, Silva, Santi, ADM
Aguero, Kane
Myhill, Ayoze, PVA, Haidara
Bank 0.1m, 1FTE) Breadbin in for a hit.
He's not worth a freebie let alone a hit!
Call me crazy, but I like D. (A is the sensible choice.)
Morning all.
Decent sized green for me (first in a while) with Aguero (C), Bellerin, Giroud and Sanchez to go! Hopefully I can hold it tomorrow 😛
Still confused about how Bertrand managed 2 BAPS with no goal involvement or CS, he could've had an assist as well if Pelle stuck his boot out a bit more on the goal line. Good differential now, though!
How did everyone else go yesterday?Ruth overtook TM!
😡
😀
24 with Silva, Sanchez, Aguero and Wally (c) to go. Feeling nervous/excited for tomorrow's games!
Nice, snagged a green!
Same here, mate. Should be interesting though.
42 with hopefully 5 (inc. C) still to play.
Great score?
Hope so. If my remaining 6 (if you count the captain as two) were to match my first 6, I'll be close to my best individual Gameweek score of the season, which would be amazing with Hazard, Kane and Rose on the bench! 🙂
And what's that I hear from all the Rooney (C) haters.....silence
Haters? I never thought there were any in the lead up to this GW. Rooney was always a good captaincy shout.
Some people didnt grasp the fact he'd be playing further forward and kept trotting out the "hes useless in midfield" line
The game day crowd are always stupid.
Ouch
😀 good money coming my way on WoofBet!
rooney is always supposed to do well right in a fixture like this? If there are haters its just being jealous. I would have got him in if it does not involve an -8
No need to worry. Those of us who truly understand the game would have thought that Rooney (C) wasn't a terrible idea. All in all....well done. I thought about getting him in when I heard RVP was out, but I couldn't quite swing it logically to fit my team without some pretty intense surgery to the squadron.
this. The ones who would have benefited from Rooney would have been the Costa/RVP/Falcao owners as a switch was logical.
For those with Kun, Giroud/Defoe and Kane, it was really a tough ask to get Rooney in with all that nonsense with Wisdom/PVA/Baird to sort.
Tips for next week
Krul foster
Kosc terry clyne pva wolly
Walters hazard. Sanchez ki Elia
Kun Kane giroud
3.3 itb 2 ft2 of Lloris, Walker, Chadli and Eriksen in
Walker and eriksen?
If you can afford it, seems like the best bet.
Thanks brother
Sky or BT showing the Pool/City game tomorrow?
sky
Cheers. Get to see captain Kun then.
PvA to hold his place now? I thought he played quite well yesterday and it seemed Sunderland only got broken down after the red card (although United did have some decent chances beforehand).
He played well because he didn't need to mark anyone in the first half. Come the second half Januzaj was all over him causing him all sorts of problems.
Thought he was terrible, AdM was useless but still had him unsettled.
Think he might do well as a winger/wingback like Hull's Elmo
Was just wondering what a rank 1600 was good for and saw this guy: http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/33727/history/
Putting together tidy back-to-back seasonswhat rank *A SCORE OF 1600
On a hell of a run since Christmas!
It's almost an inverse Innsie! 😆
😆 Innsie's fixed it now
I was thinking the same thing! 😆
*innverse Innsie 😉
Alexis Sanchez has scored or assisted in 29 of his last 31 league starts at home.
This is proof of the 'due' concept.
I suppose some would say he was 'due' a blank against Leicester (one of the two blanks)...
All a matter of probability. If a player averages 1 assist per home game over numerous home games then goes on a run of blanks, then he is due.
Sorry, its actually 28 out of 30.
26 goals and 19 assists in those 30 games though...
0.94 Goals+Assists = essentially 'due' every game regardless of what's gone before.
Too simple my friend. The law of averages means a sample should be taken over a run of games, not just one.
?? My sample is 31 games and that sample says he gets close enough to a goal/assist every game.
Yes, but you talk about due every game. It should be more general than that. You could say that for every blank in succession he becomes more due? TBF there are other variables such as statistical backing, positioning etc.
oh God that gambler's fallacy is making me shiver.
C'mon now, are you suggesting stats cannot be used to suggest imminent returns? is the explosion imminent table useless?
Throw in other variables such as player position (more or less likely to get assists/goals, or the same)
History of returns and averages.
Put all these factors together and I think its reasonable to come to some understanding about 'due'. I'm not talking about flipping a coin here.The goals imminent list is always just a subset of players who have had 10+ shots recently, but havent scored more than one. If you compare them to the other subset of players with 10+ shots in the last 4 but have scored 2+ there is no demonstrable difference in the two groups next performances. At all.
The only thing the list is good for is that they are usually differentials in FPL as their good production is flying under the table.
The only thing that I find demonstrably effects "due" is coming off a run of hard fixtures into some easy ones.
Sorry writing this in parts as things come to me.Interesting. Well at least you are being consistent with your own logic.
Saying that someone with a history of returns is more and more likely to get returns the more he's blanked recently is total hogwash.
😆 I must use hogwash more often at work.
Didn't Harry Potter go there?
The 2014/2015 FPL season 'tis the season that keeps on taking. Ugghhhh, today was a rough one.
But, there's always tomorrow, and I got plenty of firepower left in me lads. Including my capitan Aguero. So, don't cry for me, Argentina.
Since gw23 been on a streak of red arrows. Sometimes u just have to take it as it is and wait for ur luck to change
Yeah. I agree. I can't really complain, as the GW is not yet over and I have actually been on a pretty good run lately. I've just never known a season to be so....what's the word....ornery! It's pure ridiculousness, I say. How does ADM get yanked at halftime without an injury? How does Martin Atkinson miss an obvious penalty that would have rewarded two of my players (Ivanovic/Hazard)? .........the list goes on 🙂
Anyone still playing UFPL? How many matchday 1 players do you have on Tuesday?
I only have 2/25! Clyne (C), Hutton (VC) and that's it.
5 plus 5 DGWers. going to be tough I reckon making the right choices for starting & bench.
any advice on this? Zamora my only DGW lol
http://i.imgur.com/NcS6Ulw.pngSurely he is more of a blank gameweeker?
The guys played in 22/26 games this season.
Not really seeing any obvious alternative to what you've picked Balders, almost a normal FPL week in that respect. You've got 3 defenders on bench but only need 2 to cover the 2 gw1ers but I'd take 3 incase 1 doesn't start and there's not many options on your unused bench.
Decisions are Zamora & who you captain in matchday 2 but most of us are in same situation I guess.
Henderson in for Boyd ait may between him & Downing if Walcott doesn't start.
Not much help as you've got it covered. 🙂Thank you! done Boyd -> Hendo. Im seeing a big red arrow here with this "normal FPL week" team, missing out on DGW big time 🙁
DGWers have there own risk in this, won't be playing Giroud & possibly not Costa to go with Austin & Kane - could backfire big time.
I enjoy the game but this week could be painful.
Good luck with it.thanks, you too 🙂
How many players are left for everyone? Only Aguero, Coutinho and Amoebi-Bellerin's sub appearance for me :/
I got 5. Aguero (C), Naismith, Yaya, Sanchez, and Ozil.
Let's have some goals on Sunday.
It sure was fun last GW rooting him on here on FFS, wasn't it!?! Let's hope for more, though I will likely miss a lot of the match for a family thang. Know that I will be there in spirit, TM245!
Moreno
Walcott Sanchez Silva
Aguero (c) Giroud Naismith2 Naismith owners 😎
The Deadzone attracts some strange people...
Ha ha! 9 points last GW! I actually got some inspiration to pick a guy up that paid off! 🙂
In recent games, he was looking like he was getting some pretty good chances at both goals and assists. So I made the move to nab him.
4
4, Triple Arsenal attack + Aguero.
4
4.
Kosc, Sanchez, Cazorla, Kun.
34 with aguero Silv(c) carz Sanchez Naismith
Aquero (C) Silva, Cazorla, Giroud & Bellerin.
25 with Caz Sanchez Giroud Kun(c) to go
Siggy in for a hit replaced by PVA off the bench, any good?
ouch that's a tough break.
Yeah, hoping that Silva can make it all worth it. Siggy was the makeweight, never considered Puncheon as an option, couldn't afford Mane.
excellent.
9 years, 2 months agoLooking at my team for next gw and currently only have Kane in terms of dgw players think I might just leave it at that, Kane is enough right?