Technical Area

The Technical Area – Assessing Ramsey’s Villa Performance

A change of tactics from Arsene Wenger helped Arsenal sweep aside Villa last weekend and recover from a midweek humbling at Dortmund. The Gunners boss benched Alexis Sanchez and switched from his new 4-1-4-1 formation to last year’s 4-2-3-1 system, which crucially allowed Mesut Ozil to move to the role in “the hole” behind Danny Welbeck.

Both players silenced the critics by chipping in with a goal and assist in the 3-0 victory and Ozil, who had previously been fielded on the Arsenal left, felt the switch was fundamental to his side’s success.

“We played a bit differently, in our more usual system. I think that we were a bit better, a bit more organised and in the end that led to our success.”

 

involvement

From a Fantasy perspective, though, one of the main points from the weekend encounter was Aaron Ramsey’s shift to the double-pivot. As the average position map from the match shows, Ramsey (number 16) was tasked with adding a little more solidity alongside Mikel Arteta (number 8) as Wenger looked to tighten up in the middle after being completely overrun by Dortmund last midweek. Ozil (number 11) and Welbeck (number 23) moved left to create space and receive the ball whenever Santi Cazorla (number 19) drifted in from the flank, whilst Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain (number 15) also played fairly centrally from his starting position on the right, with the Gunners’ full-backs, Calum Chambers (number 21) and Kieran Gibbs (number 3) supplying the width from deep.

Already, over 51,000 Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers have parted company with the Welshman this week. One glance at his statistics over 78 minutes on the field, when compared to his Gameweek 1-4 averages, certainly indicates a lack of impact. In the final third of the pitch, Ramsey’s touches slumped from 41.8 to 25, as did his passes received (29.5 to 18) and successful passes (24 to 11). Ramsey’s touches in the box also dropped from a previous average of four down to two and, having now failed to score in each of his last three, the exodus is picking up pace.

When assessing Ramsey’s performance, though, it’s crucial to look at the overall picture both from a team and match perspective.

Arsenal chalked up a massive 72.5% possession at Villa Park last weekend – up on their Gameweek 1-4 average of 61.6% – though it’s somewhat telling that their team average for touches in the final third dropped significantly, down from a previous of 274.5 to 212 on Saturday.

Furthermore, their Gameweek 1-4 average for touches in the box also slipped from 28.5 to 21 against Paul Lambert’s side, whilst the Gunners fired an effort every 10.3 minutes last weekend compared to a far quicker pace of 5.8 minutes per attempt beforehand.

Essentially, then, after scoring three times in six minutes during the first period, Wenger’s side were happy to keep ball and never really needed to extend themselves as an attacking force thereafter. With a 3-0 advantage after 36 minutes, the Villa Park encounter became an exercise in possession for the visitors – it seems more likely that they attacked less in comparison to previous matches because they simply didn’t need to. Saturday was the first time this term where Arsenal went in at the break with an advantage – and a substantial one at that – and it was therefore unnecessary to bomb forward in the final third to the same extent as in previous Gameweeks.

In terms of involvement, for example, Ramsey’s minutes per touch (0.8) remained exactly the same, whilst the upturn in possession meant his minutes per pass received actually quickened from 1.1 to 0.9 before he was withdrawn with 12 minutes remaining, suggesting he was far from a peripheral figure.

Indeed, given the drop in team stats, then, Ramsey’s attacking numbers, when compared to those of his team-mates, can be looked upon in a different light. His 25 touches in the final third mirrored Welbeck’s and was just one fewer than Ozil managed over 93 minutes. He also received the same number of passes in the final third as Ozil (18), and while he was somewhat sloppy in possession in the final third, with a 73.3% accuracy down from 80% beforehand, he still produced a couple of key passes – joint-top for the Gunners along with Welbeck and Ozil. The Welshman also managed two attempts on goal – again, the equal of Ozil and a tally bettered only by Welbeck.

Certainly, Ramsey’s stats are worth monitoring – a three-match goal drought, for example, looks the main concern here as opposed to Saturday’s showing. Delving into the weekend numbers, however, suggests that, relative to his team-mates, Ramsey still offered enough to suggest he’s far from off-form. Granted, the data is indicative of the Welshman – and his fellow Gunners – playing with the handbrake on but it’s fair to say that Wenger’s side won’t be able to coast through many matches in a similar manner this season and will, far more often than not, still be reliant on Ramsey’s well-timed runs from deep to make the difference.

*The Technical Area is put together using the statistics and maps available in our members area. For access to such data and tools on every player, team and match of the 2014/15 season, and for exclusive members articles like this, click here for details.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

3,571 Comments Post a Comment
  1. gers23
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Ramsey or Wellbeck?

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      dat guy

    2. RideMyPony
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Welbz

      1. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        amen! 🙂

    3. chrisjdgrady
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Welbz but I have both. Ramsey deserves a chance in the derby. Could explode. If he blanks then he's out for sure!

      1. FPL Blow-In
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        I think Ramsey is still going to get good returns and a lot of people are gonna be kicking themselves for dropping him

  2. RideMyPony
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Good evning guys, so this is my team so far ahead of this gw. i got 1FT and my worry points are the following: KRUL(!!) Zaha and Naismith.. what is my biggest worry here? im pretty fed up with krul to be honest and newcastle look terrible. Krul->heaton for free? or do i need a hit here?

    Krul (Guzan)

    Clyne/PVA/Wilson (Moreno/Moore)

    Hazard/Sterling/ADM/siggy (zaha)

    Costa(C)/Aguero/Naismith

    1FT .0 itb

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      nah dont use ur FT on Krul. i'm sticking with him

  3. Lingardium Leviosa.
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Naismith > Ulloa -4 is mental right?

    1. RideMyPony
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Thinking the same, got both naismith and zaha, was a mouse click away from doing the hit on sunday. got talked out of it. So no.. dont think its worth a hit.

    2. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Yes when pool couldnt keep a clean sheet if their wives fake tan shipments depended on it......

      1. chrisjdgrady
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        lol!

      2. Big_Andy_GAWA
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Naismith completely rested tonight, if that's any help...

        1. Lingardium Leviosa.
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          it is actually

  4. Dr Dream
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    After weeks of complex development and extensive research the results are in.

    My newly developed Wakatronomatic stats generator has analysed the likely current goal threat of all mids..and compiled the following table..(30+ only and accurate to +/- 1.0)

    Sanchez 45
    Hazard 43
    Chadli 40
    Tadic 38
    Arfield 37
    Cabella 36
    Ramsey 35
    Mirallas 34
    Sterling 34

    Further analysis of existing data from the 2013/14 season reveal that Walcotts last known reading using the same formula was....62.....!!!!

    1. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      looking wild
      walcott (when fit)is outstanding-wonder how this will interrelate with sanchez?

    2. Ludo
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Hmm, interesting, ta. Who else features near the top of the Wakatronomatic generator for last season, then?

    3. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      nice one Wakey 🙂

      damn Hazard and Alexis are taunting me...pity about their price compared to the other quality mids in the game...

      1. chrisjdgrady
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Think Sanchez will be worth it in the end!

    4. BeachBadger
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Sterling a bit low on this I would think as I would probably rate him more likely to score than all of them. Is this just for the next game or in general? Walcotts figures are always off the charts.

    5. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      No Fabregas or ADM

      As expected really, they are just assist machines.

  5. ONTHEGEAR
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    im 353 overall !!! not to shabby 🙂

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Good job how many points you on

      1. ONTHEGEAR
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        329 points.....sorry im 358 overall not 353

    2. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      haha well done mate! 🙂

      1. ONTHEGEAR
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        cheers son

    3. Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Tremendous!

    4. Sess!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      You only just realised?!

  6. Ludo
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    RE: The discussion on the previous page about how high you'd finish with a 300k GW rank every week.

    Last year's winner had an average GW rank of 418,233, which, given that doesn't take hits into account, suggests you'd win FPL pretty comfortably.

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      u just had to right? 🙄

      1. Ludo
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Right. 🙂 Five minutes out of my day, thought someone would find it interesting.

    2. Kerz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Nice.

      300000(0.1)^38 if I'm not mistaken. ~3e-33 percentile

      1. Kerz
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Makes perfect sense.

        Top 300k rank every week, in other words, would be a ridiculous victory. Massive.

    3. chrisjdgrady
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      "average" is the key there

    4. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      300K then 300K in GW would see a massive green arrow so an easy win.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        GW2*

    5. SC not pearls before swine
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      But the person with the highest GW rank doesn't necessarily win. If I scored 500 points one week and 0 points the next, my GW average would be in the millions, but I'd be better off than someone with a 300k rank each week assuming they scored 50ish points every week.

      Not really arguing with your conclusion, but looking at last year's winner's GW rank doesn't really prove anything.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Just a comparison. Doubt he had many GWs over 1 millionth for the GW.

        1. SC not pearls before swine
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          True, true, but the way to prove it would be to look at the score for 300k GW rank each week, and add the scores together. I assume you'd win but if somebody had a few giant scores (And a few low scores) he or she could beat you with a lower GW rank.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            Over 38 GWs, no chance.

            1. SC not pearls before swine
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 8 months ago

              Surely they'd have as good (Better) a chance as a person scoring exactly at the 300k rank every week?

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 15 Years
                9 years, 8 months ago

                Nope.

                300K each week pretty much will half their rank each gameweek.

                Rough examples

                http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/880204/history/
                http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/653033/history/

                1. SC not pearls before swine
                  • 13 Years
                  9 years, 8 months ago

                  Yeah, but my point is that it would be nearly impossible to have exactly a 300k rank each week. Roughly as improbable as having a few giant weeks and a few stinkers, and beating out that person with exactly a 300k every week.

                  1. TorresMagic™
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 15 Years
                    9 years, 8 months ago

                    Of course it's impossible to get a GW rank of 3/400K every week.
                    I guarantee that 300K each GW would win FPL every season & every more now with the added players.

                2. SC not pearls before swine
                  • 13 Years
                  9 years, 8 months ago

                  Another question, if you're at 300k every week, are you better off than someone who is alternating between 200k and 400k every week? And the answer is, you don't know, it depends on the distribution of points.

                  1. TorresMagic™
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 15 Years
                    9 years, 8 months ago

                    I'd probably want the alternating rank with 200K in the high scoring weeks.

      2. awgJose
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        There could also be 299,999 people who do better than you every gameweek.

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          Having 1 doing better than you every week is unlikely. Just have to make ground in their bad weeks.

          1. awgJose
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            Yeah but just saying, if you were top 300k every week, statistically the only guarantee is that you'll be in the top 300k at the end of the season.

            1. awgJose
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 8 months ago

              Though that's not guaranteed either, because different GWs have different point results. Right, this is enough of thinking for tonight, off to bed.

      3. Ludo
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        You're right, it's just a guide, not bulletproof.

  7. aaroneous
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    So who's grabbing Muniesa?! 😛

    1. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      nobody until pieters is out proper injured
      as good as muniesa evidence is he is cover

      1. aaroneous
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Ha, I was poking at the kneejerkers. Didn't know he came from Barca, tho. Could snag a chance if he ever gets one.

        1. 32chickens
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          excellent player in the making with a good goal scoring threat
          sadly pieters more mature
          manager despite reputation does not give youth much of a chance

    2. emperikal
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      I'm a bit uncomfortable being a Pieters owner!

      1. 32chickens
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        so am i
        no worries

  8. sinik
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    hey all

    .....................Begovic
    .........Ivanovic - Clyne - Moreno
    Sigurdsson - Cesc - Sterling - Di Maria
    .........Rooney - Naismith - Costa

    Gilks; Chambers, Marney, Hutton

    want 2 FT for GW8 but have a few moves I want to make before GW7 (and would need to save one)..

    so am tempted by a silly hit this week:
    Begovic + Moreno > Forster + Moore

    to prep for Ivanovic + Naismith > Baines + Welbeck during the international break

    lunacy? I want to make all 4 moves but I'm just not sure on the order/timing..

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      just play Begotits

    2. The Happy One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      You don't really need to make those transfers this week... got a great XI

      1. sinik
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        I don't want to stick with Moreno just for POSSIBLE attacking points and it doesn't look like they'll be getting cleansheets anytime soon..

        so basically for him to get anything but 1 or 2 points vs Everton he'll need a goal or assist, not great odds..same goes for Chambers

      2. sinik
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        maybe I'll just only do Moreno + Naismith > Moore + Welbeck and leave Begovic for now, he does have good fixtures after all..maybe Stoke will finally shore up

  9. Lingardium Leviosa.
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Naismith 343 or Ramsey 352

    1. Patty
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Ramsey 352

    2. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      ram

      1. Lingardium Leviosa.
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        but but albino 🙁

    3. chrisjdgrady
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Ramsey just feels a real good prospect this week

    4. Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Isn't Ramsey 352 a betting site

  10. The Happy One
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Pick the top 5 from these in order of points over the entire season:

    Di Maria, Hazard, Fabregas, Sterling, Sanchez, Silva, Ramsey, Toure, Walcott

    (The first 5 is my order from most to least)... very difficult

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Di Maria

      Sterling

      Sanchez

      Fabregas

      Hazard

    2. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      wow-interestin
      my assumption is ars have the best combo but they will share the points
      silva is qualitee but injury prone
      toure wants out

      so i'd agree with your first 4 in the same order
      good diversion

    3. SC not pearls before swine
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      1. Hazard
      2. Sanchez
      3. Ramsey
      4. Sterling
      5. Di Maria

      1. Patty
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        wow no fabregas!

        1. SC not pearls before swine
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          Could be a mistake. I just don't totally trust Chelsea to continue to be a juggernaut (I think JM will want to tighten it up), and I think they're good enough to be involved in a lot of competitions so Cesc might feel the bite of rotation. The same can be said of Hazard but I really think penalties will be huge over the long haul.

    4. Chelsea Dagger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      ADM
      Fab
      Sterling
      Ramsey
      Hazmat

    5. finchie89
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Di Maria , Sterling , Fabregas , Walcott , sanchez/hazard

  11. Patty
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Is that extra 0.1 on Duff justified against Moore?

    1. sinik
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Leicester look a far better unit than Burnley IMO..even when they lost 2-0 against Chelsea they were resolute and took the game to them

      1. Patty
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        so I should go with Moore?

        1. sinik
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          I personally like it and am looking at him as a Moreno replacement to free up funds

          1. Patty
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            yeah I'm looking at it for mertesacker to free up funds also

  12. MMN
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Is the price changes site not working properly? Already lost out on 0.2m from not doing mata > di maria ... is he due to rise tonight?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Not predicted to rise tonight.

  13. bodsc
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    What duo would you prefer going forward..

    Baines & Falcao or ShawX & Aguero?

    1. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Baines and Falcao

  14. Bolivian Seaman
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Sterling played 120 minutes 🙁

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      and fecked a penalty.

    2. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      BR doesn't know what his doing......little match coming up at w/e.....

    3. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      and missed a pen 🙁

    4. A.
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      He should still play the derby

    5. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      🙁

    6. Chelsea Dagger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Serling is what - 19 ? He should be ok by weekend. Maybe only 60 minutes if Pool can get a 2 goal lead.

      1. BeachBadger
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        I think its more about priorities. He said he doesnt want to burden the kid. Benches him in a n important Prem game which they then lost and then goes and plays him in a much less important cup game.

  15. CCaddy
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    I know it's a very different but what do you think of this wildcard team???

    Courtouis

    Terry kompany baines chambers clyne

    Sterling Di Maria sig dyer Boyd

    Costa welbeck pelle

    The thinking behind it is

    It allows me to play a very strong back 5 on some occasions. When Swansea have a strong fixture 4 can be played across the midfield. All 3 strikers are the main centre forwards for their teams and so it's unlikely goals and assists will be shared.

    What do you all think?

    1. Bolivian Seaman
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      It's ok, defence is where the bps are so it's quite a good idea to have a heavy backline

      1. Lingardium Leviosa.
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        but too heavy imo. why siggy AND dyer? put boyd in there and u only have 2 elite mids

        1. Bolivian Seaman
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          4-3-3 is the best formation for that team

          1. Lingardium Leviosa.
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            but 433 is historicall not the best. 343 and then 352

    2. sinik
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      defense is too strong, drop Terry for now to a cheap-o..Baines may be worth only getting in GW8

      Pelle seems aaalright

    3. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Terry out for Iva
      Welbeck out for Ulloa

      1. Patty
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        no no no, if anything make defence cheaper and attack/midfield more expensive.

        1. Chelsea Dagger
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          Agree. You need another strong midfielder. Dyer won't cut it. Still think Fab will be a point machine.

          1. Patty
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            agree 100%

        2. Durr
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          From the guy who has Mert and Moreno lol 😀

          1. Patty
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            shhhhhh

          2. Patty
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            that was a mistake at the start of the season

    4. BeachBadger
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Doubling up on Swansea mids is not a good idea I think. Not attacking enough to justify it. Look at Wakeys table of attacking teams.

      Terry, Courtois and Kompany not justifying their prices at the minute. Cheapies just as good for now.

  16. Patty
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Should I play
    A. Mertesacker (TOT H)
    B. Moreno (EVE H)

    1. Bolivian Seaman
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      A

    2. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Neither

    3. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      ditto

      1. 32chickens
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        same-there are lots more options for a relaxed GW!!

  17. Venom Snake
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    sterling playing the full game isn't good for us owners

    1. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      aye - wtf was BR thinking 😕

      1. FPL_JAAFAR
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        shite indeed

  18. FPL_JAAFAR
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    pieters playing??

    1. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      rested last night i believe

      1. FPL_JAAFAR
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        muniesa played instead ended up with 2 goal

  19. Tony Yeboah
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29338750

    jwp out for 10 weeks

    i planned to ditch tadic after this gw but with his rival for gametime out and confirmed on pens im having 2nd thoughts

    1. Ludo
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Not so much rival for gametime as for set pieces. Both JWP and Tadic are excellent set piece takers, but with the former out, Tadic's total monopoly on corners and free kicks could be very fruitful.

    2. 32chickens
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      jwp competing i believe now with sneid and wany
      tadic will play aside pelly with mane on other side
      keep the tadic faith

  20. Patty
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    How many points did Walcott get last year?

    1. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      More than most for gametime, but less than Villa fans have fingers

    2. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      72 from 860 mins 😯

      1. chrisjdgrady
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        0_0

      2. sinik
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        7.53 points per 90, pretty damn good..

    3. Ludo
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Got two assists in the first four games, then got injured. Got a couple more assists in four sub appearances as he made his way back to fitness. Then, fully fit, he got 5 goals and 1 assist in 5 starts, then picked up a season ending injury.

      1. SC not pearls before swine
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        I had him for those first 4 games. Bought him as soon he was back for the sub appearances. And then sold him right before his brace against Manchester City...

    4. Kerz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      His PPG rivaled or bettered Yaya's iirc 😯

  21. Hurnt
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Pick the 3 to drop this week

    DDG

    Lovren Peiters Wisdom Clyne N Taylor

    Haz Erikson Sigurdsson ADM Boyd

    Aguero Costa Ullao

    Tempted to drop Boyd N Taylor and Lovren ?????

    What would u do ?

    1. Hurnt
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      To bench *

    2. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Boyd Naylor Lovren...

      1. 32chickens
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        boyd wisdom lovren

    3. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Id agree, cant see pool keeping everton out, but i cant see stoke not conceeding either, so its down to attacking points then, and guess Lovren edges it as thats the reason u have him......

    4. Hy liverpool
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Naylor boyd lovren

    5. Hurnt
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      So benching eriksen Boyd and Lovren bad idea?

    6. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      agree

      1. LOCO ABREU
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        or wisdorm instead of lovren

  22. Hy liverpool
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Balo→pelle (c)
    Worth a hit??????
    Cheers!

    1. Chelsea Dagger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      i think so. contrary to others, think it could be a high scoring weekend. Soton vs. QPR especially.

    2. Walsh
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      No. I do not think Pelle is captain material. I would make that transfer, though.

  23. FPL_JAAFAR
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    this week will be a low scoring one

    1. Hy liverpool
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Why??

    2. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      don't think so

  24. Venom Snake
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    @AR
    How many chances/weeks will you give ramsey before you consider selling

    1. chrisjdgrady
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Held him since first week but if he blanks this week I think I'm ditching. Especially if ADM does well again, or Ozil puts in another good performance, or Sanchez keeps scoring.. etc

    2. Aaron Ramessi - Straya
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      if he blanks against spurs + chelsea then he will have to go 🙁

    3. Hy liverpool
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Gw 6

    4. Chelsea Dagger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Thru GW8 (Hull at home) or as soon as Walcott comes back. Need some Arse midfield coverage, especially if Walcott plays out of position forward

      1. chrisjdgrady
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Almost definitely won't play striker

    5. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Had to ditch this week going on the ADM bandwagon, only way i could afford it after holding on for a week too long......

  25. Rhaldy 7
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    omg wtf is wrong with aguero? its my got damn joker

    1. Ludo
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Probably nothing serious, Pellegrini said he should be okay for the weekend - may well just be an excuse to rest him tomorrow night.

      1. Rhaldy 7
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        jeez, sweet sounds.

  26. Back to Back Ballacks
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    What I want to see is a Southampton midfield/attack members article

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoqDYcCDOTg

    1. Kerz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Kelvin, Ramsey > ADM

      Y / N ?

      1. Back to Back Ballacks
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        kelvin?

        1. Kerz
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 8 months ago

          Name of the manager of the team linked in your profile.

          1. Back to Back Ballacks
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 8 months ago

            ?
            first I heard, that aint me, must go sort that shit out, Ramsey to ADM, Hell Yeah

    2. Sess!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Hear hear......prob be one once mane gets a couple of games.

  27. Ser Football 42
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Forster
    Bertrand Ivan Naylor
    ADM, Fabregas, Siggy, Sterling
    Costa, Pelle, Welbeck

    any suggestions?

    1. Hy liverpool
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Subs.??

  28. Patty
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Most consistent GK up until January?

    1. chrisjdgrady
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Still too early to say but Forster looking a good bet. Even thinking Heaton if I WC. Pretty solid defensively for that price

    2. Durr
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Forster looking that way atm other than 3 gws in nov/dec

    3. Sess!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Got to be Forster

  29. Cheeseoid
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Krul injury? That is the only way a 10 man team will improve my score next week

  30. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Too rough examples of 300K GW for 5 GWs.

    http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/880204/history/
    http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/653033/history/

    Give them another 10 or so in GW2 & then you have an idea how well that average GW rank of 300K would go.

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Two*