Scout Notes

Chelsea showing FPL consistency as Brighton boss clarifies penalty takers

Eden Hazard (£10.6m) and Marcos Alonso (£6.7m) added to their Fantasy Premier League goal involvement tallies again on Saturday as the pair continue to show consistency.

Both players should earn further backing over the international break as Fantasy managers hope to buy into them while they are still returning with reliability.

In another Scout Notes article, we’ve also got an update on who the designated penalty taker is at Brighton after Pascal Groß (£6.9m) missed one and Glenn Murray (£6.5m) dispatched his in a 2-2 draw with Fulham.

READ NEXT: The FPL lessons learned from Liverpool’s 2-1 win at Leicester City

CHELSEA 2-0 BOURNEMOUTH

  • Goals: Pedro (£6.7m), Eden Hazard (£10.6m)
  • Assists: Olivier Giroud (£7.9m), Marcos Alonso (£6.7m)

Marcos Alonso (£6.7m) has rightfully earned his place in the so-called FPL triumvirate of premium full-backs with a fourth consecutive of points haul. The extra money required to purchase the Chelsea man has put some managers off, but his consistency continues to be remarkable. Crucially, he has been present in the penalty box in the first four Gameweeks more often than his average time spent there last season. His assist tally is now up to five and his collection of bonus points has increased to nine. Alonso was also unlucky not to score against Bournemouth, hitting the post in the first-half. Now that Alonso’s ownership is over 35 percent and counting, those without him in their squads may have their hands forced with him facing a meeting with Cardiff in Gameweek 5. Given that he helped shutout a lively Bournemouth side at Stamford Bridge to record a second clean sheet of the campaign, he just looks the complete package. Manager Maurizio Sarri largely agrees as he sung his praises post-match, but he would like to see Alonso make some improvements.

“Alonso, at the moment, this position at left-back is maybe the best in Europe. Physical qualities at a top level, I think. He’s doing very well in the offensive phase. But I also think he can improve in the defensive phase. If he improves that, he could be the best left-back in the world.” – Maurizio Sarri

There was some instant gratification for the 150,000+ managers who jumped aboard the Eden Hazard (£10.6m) train for Gameweek 4, as he scored in the 85th minute. It took some time for the Belgian to deliver, but that has been a hallmark of his season so far. His two goals and two assists have all come after 76 minutes. Of encouragement for his owners was that no Chelsea player registered more touches in the penalty box than Hazard but there were some aspects of his game to cause slight concern. Three of his colleagues registered more shots on goal than him against Bournemouth including full-back Alonso. Furthermore, it looks as if Hazard may not feature in set pieces quite as much in 2018/19. For a first-half free-kick he was not even considered as a potential taker, with Willian (£7.4m), David Luiz (£5.5m) and Alonso vying for it; it was the latter who eventually took it. Willian also remains the corner taker, with Hazard firing in just one on Saturday.

We should probably draw attention to the fact that the results of our Richarlison Replacements article have proved successful so far, even if things looked bleak initially. Chelsea midfielder Pedro (£6.7m) came out on top of the comparison we ran of potential candidates so we were disappointed to see Willian taking his starting berth when the team sheets came out at 2pm. However, the Spaniard went on to net his third goal of the season. Furthermore, he managed more shots on target than any of his colleagues despite playing just 25 minutes.

For now, Alonso, Hazard and Pedro appear the best options at Chelsea going forward, especially considering that the forward line at Stamford Bridge appears a little unsettled. Olivier Giroud (£7.9m) has replaced Alvaro Morata (£9.0m) for the final half an hour in the last two matches and there have been calls for the Frenchman to start next week against Cardiff. Sarri added further confusion to that situation by talking up the strengths of both his centre-forwards.

“It depends upon the situation on the pitch. At the moment, we crossed three, four, five times in three minutes, so I thought Giroud, in that moment, was better. Only for this. It depends upon the situation. Alvaro is improving. Maybe Alvaro needs more space, but I am lucky because, in this situation, Giroud is very useful.” – Maurizio Sarri

Although the result will largely dominate any cursory assessment of the visitors, Bournemouth were very good in large spells of the match. Not only were they equal to Chelsea’s offensive assets for 72 minutes, they caused them problems on the counter-attack. Despite losing 2-0, Bournemouth did not give up any chances that were considered to be ‘big’ by Opta, meaning they have allowed the same number as Liverpool have done after four matches. That suggests there may well be potential for clean sheets later in the campaign, home matches against Leicester, Crystal Palace and Southampton between now and Gameweek 9 of particular interest.

“We did well for large parts. Chelsea are a completely different team this year. Two key moments in the game. Maurizio has a very distinct way of playing. We tried to nullify their threats and up until the first goal it was right in the balance. There is individual talent but we doubled up well and restricted the space, the two goals might be where we didn’t quite get it right.” – Eddie Howe

Howe made changes to his usual 4-4-2 formation to roll out a 3-4-3 in this particular match, with Ryan Fraser (£5.6m) deployed on the left flank of the front three. It may be two matches in a row without an FPL return for the Scottish winger but it was him who spent the most time in Chelsea’s penalty area and played more successful passes in the final third compared to his team-mates. His 5.5 percent ownership certainly shouldn’t get cold feet about his Fantasy capabilities.

However, the Charlie Daniels (£4.5m) era at Bournemouth seems to be well and truly over now that, as expected, Diego Rico (£4.5m) came into the side with his suspension served over the first three Gameweeks. The new signing seemed to fit right in, especially playing as an advanced wing-back in the 3-4-3 system, and his taking of four corners produced more key passes than any other Cherries option at Stamford Bridge.

CHELSEA XI (4-3-2-1): Kepa; Alonso, Rudiger, David Luiz, Azpilicueta; Kovacic (Loftus-Cheek 79’), Kante, Jorginho; Hazard, Willian (Pedro 65’); Morata (Giroud 61’).

BOURNEMOUTH XI (3-4-3): Begovic; S Cook, Ake, Francis; Rico, Lerma (L Cook 88’), Gosling, A Smith (Ibe 80’); Fraser, Wilson, King (Mousset (80’).

BRIGHTON 2-2 FULHAM

Goals: Glenn Murray x2 (£6.5m) | Andre Schürrle (£5.9m), Aleksandar Mitrovic (£6.6m)

Assists: Anthony Knockaert (£5.5m) | Jean Michael Seri (£5.4m)

According to Chris Hughton, Pascal Groß (£6.9m) remains the Brighton penalty taker even after Glenn Murray (£6.5m) secured a point from the spot on Saturday afternoon. The German saw his first-half effort, rewarded after a foul on Murray, saved by David Bettinelli (£4.5m). When Aleksandar Mitrovic (£6.6m) was penalised for handball in the second-half, it was Murray, already one goal to the good at this point, who found the net from the spot, with Groß now off the pitch. Whether he can lay claim to the next penalty remains to be seen, as the Seagulls boss reiterated after the match that Groß was unlucky not to score.

“It was a very good save. We have a penalty taker, at the moment Pascal is our penalty taker. It’s a little bit in the lap of the gods. You hope he strikes it well enough; he did. The goalkeeper guessed the right way and when I see it again I’m sure I will think of it more as a good save than a bad miss.” – Chris Hughton

One thing that is still in Murray’s favour is that Groß’s minutes continue to be managed. He was substituted on the 60 minute mark at the Amex on Saturday, having managed just a 10-minute cameo at Anfield in Gameweek 3. Conversely, 34-year-old Murray has played every single second of the 2018/19 campaign thus far, meaning he is bound to take some penalties in the future with the amount of time Groß is spending off the pitch. Hughton did explain the decision to bring Groß off at 2-0 down was a tactical one, but it is discouraging to hear that the German is not considered capable of helping inspire a comeback.

“You have to try and do it in a controlled way, because if you go gung-ho at that stage, with the system they were playing and the players they’ve got, they’ll go on to get a third goal. But you’ve got to be positive. We decided to go 4-4-2 with [Alireza] Jahanbakhsh on the right-hand side and we dropped [Yves] Bissouma in. In a structured way, we went for it.” – Chris Hughton

Lewis Dunk (£4.4m) returned to the side after missing out on the trip to Anfield, with Leon Balogun (£4.4m) dropping to the bench. While Brighton are yet to keep a clean sheet and have conceded seven goals in four matches, Dunk’s fall in price may make him an attractive proposition between Gameweek 8 and 16 when they face no sides from last season’s top six. Martín Montoya (£4.5m) made his second start in a row at right-back while Gaetan Bong (£4.5m) played at left-back in the place of new signing Bernardo (£4.4m) once again.

The goals scored by Fulham took their inspiration from the goal threat section of the FFS Members Area in this particular match. Coming into Gameweek 4, only Sergio Aguero (£11.3m) had fired off more shots among forwards than Mitrovic, and he followed that up by netting a fourth goal in his last three matches. Likewise, Andre Schürrle (£5.9m) was second only to Mohamed Salah (£13.0m) for efforts on goal among midfielders; the German duly delivering his second strike in as many appearances. While Mitrovic’s value has been apparent for some time, Schürrle’s second successive goal makes him a more established fixture on FPL radars, although it is a trip to Manchester City up next. There had been some rotation fears over his place in Fulham’s front three, amid competition for places with Ryan Sessegnon (£6.4m), Luciano Vietto (£5.5m) and Aboubakar Kamara (£4.5m), but he played those down with a second start in a row, as well as the goal. Another benching for Sessegnon should see his stock continue to plummet.

Defensively, Fulham still look like a side to avoid. Only Huddersfield have allowed more shots than the Cottagers after four matches and that has translated to nine goals conceded. That hasn’t been helped by regular changes in personnel, although Bettinelli has now started the last two in a row adding some consistency.

Finally, manager Slavisa Jokanovic played down any suggestions that Mitrovic’s confidence would take a hit after he conceded the penalty late in the game, effectively costing his side two points.

“He didn’t need to ask for any apologies. Bad luck, mistake, he knows I don’t need to explain to him that he does not need to make this kind of touch in this situation. In the end, he is enough strong to keep going. He made one mistake okay, and for another side he scored the goal, he fighting really well, he is playing the level like he started the Premier League and I don’t want to complain and put my finger to any player. I cannot find any sense.” – Slavisa Jokanovic

BRIGHTON AND HOVE ALBION XI (4-4-1-1): Ryan; Bong, Dunk, Duffy, Montoya; March, Propper (Locadia 74’), Stephens, Knockaert (Jahanbakhsh 74’); Groß (Bissouma 60’); Murray.

FULHAM XI (4-3-3): Bettinelli; Le Marchand, Odoi, Mawson, Fosu-Mensah; Zambo Anguissa (Johansen 74’), McDonald, Seri; Vietto (R Sessegnon 74’), Mitrovic, Schurrle (Chambers 87’)

READ NEXT: The FPL lessons learned from Liverpool’s 2-1 win at Leicester City

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

2,911 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Dynamic Duos
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    How does this look for gwk5 please?

    I feel I probably messed up my WC, but we can't get everything right i suppose, but feeling disappointed.

    Ederson
    Bellerin Alonso Mendy
    Salah Hazard Walcott* Fraser Mkhitaryan
    Jimenez Aguero

    Button Wan-Bissaka Duffy Kamara

    Walcott to Maddison with my ft if he is injured, I think Vardy and Maddison will be an exciting pairing.

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      That is spookily like my team.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      good team. chill!

  2. SkeletONv01
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Im off to bed, but i wanna say something, i wanna thank TorresMagic for his amazing work on price rises/falls posts, like, every day, you my dude, for years now, legendary 🙂 ty

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Cheers SkeletonV01, good night 🙂

      1. Rojo's Modern Life
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        You don't do it manually, surely?

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          he's quick, that's what she said.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      he's got nice balls i hear too.

  3. APN
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    How was Wan-Bissaka's performance yday ?

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      bad

    2. NATSTER
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      A bit concern with his starting position.

    3. Whats the Mata?
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      The entire Palace def and the team were bad. WB keeps his place imo

  4. maditass
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    After yet a week where I lost points due to having Alisson instead of Robertson I'm really considering getting him in. But that means as I will most likely use wildcard as I have red flagged Cairney in my team, arnautovic that I want to move out and my bench players are in danger to not play anymore.

    So this means I will do around 6-7 trades.

    My team is currently:

    Alisson - Hamer
    Mendy - Alonso - PvA - wan-B - Peltier
    Salah - B.silva - moura - Stephens - Cairney
    Firmino - Aguero - arnautovic

    With the trades I want to do it will look like this:

    Dubravka - Hamer
    Rob - Mendy-Alonso- Bennet- wan-B
    Salah - B.silva - moura -

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      mad. do not wc!

    2. maditass
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Omg...... post fail

      Dubravka - Hamer
      Rob - Mendy-Alonso- Bennet- wan-B
      Salah - B.silva - moura - billing - Fraser/kante/or someone else at 5.6 or less
      Aguero- firmino- mitrovic

      Alternatively I can ditch firmino to ings to get hazard or downgrade Salah to mane to make b.Silva to hazard

      Many decisions, but if I do all this. I'm pretty sure i will be really happy about my team even if I will get 30 points with it xD

      1. Demel
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        I am not convinced that your WC team is better than your current team. Robertson with a bad run if fixtures is not a reason to WC imo.

        1. maditass
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          I already have alisson, so it's mostly for the attacking returns that he gets that I want him for. It's been between 3-6 more points for him vs alisson in the goal. He is surely gonna score soon with the way he playes.
          And a Wildcard will fix my team alot around the field.

  5. Evil Greg
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Save a transfer until the 13th of Sept everyone!

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      That tends to be wise advice in the international break.

  6. Big Col
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    On WC, toughest decision.....

    A) Salah & Walcott

    B) Hazard & Mane

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      ...on current evidence...B

    2. SkeletONv01
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Salah and Mane, its our year 😉

    3. Netley Lucas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      B if you can get Mo back fairly easily

    4. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      B. But I would want Hazard and Salah on WC.

  7. King Kohli
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Very tempted to Wc this team.

    Patricio Hamer*
    Mendy TAA Tomkins* Alonso Kabasele*
    Salah Mane Dilva Walcott* Cairney*
    Kun King* Quaner*

    * Denotes players to be replaced. Can also rebalance the squad & get in the likes of Hazard etc.

    Yes or No?

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      no way!

      1. King Kohli
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Why not

    2. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I would be tempted to wildcard of I owned that team.

    3. Netley Lucas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      You know when you need to WC. You'd have done it before deadline and bagged Mitro's 6.6, so no.

  8. Demel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    My team..

    Ryan
    Alonso - Mendy -.Robertson
    Hazard - Maddison- Fraser - Pogba - Salah
    Aguero - Jimenez

    Button - Docherty - AWB - Kamara

    1 FT
    0 ITB

    Unless I get hit with any injuries/suspensions I think I will save my FT. It is nice not needing to wildcard this early. My team is usually in more of a mess at this point.

    Save FT. Do you agree?

    1. Netley Lucas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Like the Maddy pick, very tempted

      1. Demel
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        After GW1 I did KDB/Gross > Haz/Mad for my only hit of the season. He didn't keep up the pace with Rich early doors but I still believe he is the best player at that price point.

        1. Netley Lucas
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          He's so far under the radar it's untrue. Wally is not fit to lace his boots 😆

          1. Demel
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            I don't understand it. He shoots at every opportunity, the team revolves around him, he takes all of the set pieces. He plays for an attacking team. He is 6.5m.

            I couldn't for the life of me understand why people went for Walcott over him. But it is good news for me and the other 1% of owners.

            It is funny that people obsees with getting 0.1 price rise out of highly owned players but if you own a player such as Mad and he explodes it is so much better for your rank than 0.1m itb.

            1. Netley Lucas
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              Must admit to getting Wally when Richy got the red for less than admirable reasons, his numbers stank, went for the rise. I was hoping Maddy would be a bit quiet v Pool so I could time it perfectly! 😆

              1. Demel
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 8 months ago

                He is an easy trade to make this week. I suppose you got a rise from Wally as well.

            2. fedolefan
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              Probably agree with most (mainly because I don't know much about him), but disagree with Leicester being an attacking team. I don't think Puel teams have any identity to be honest. They are just whatever they want to be on any given day. Ultra defensive and bad, or uber aggressive and still bad. He's still a good pick though. I went for that dabber from United.

              1. Demel
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 8 months ago

                Leicester are now a possession based team. I think they will score and concede plenty this season. Their width is gained through their full backs and Maddison looks to pull the strings on the edge of the area with their striker picking up balls from Mad and crosses from the full backs. I think they have a clear identity. Whether it is better than their counter attacking previous identity remains to be seen.

                1. fedolefan
                  • 9 Years
                  5 years, 8 months ago

                  Great fixtures coming up though. Overlooked that a bit.

                  1. Demel
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 12 Years
                    5 years, 8 months ago

                    I agree. But the same is true for Leicester.

            3. 420king
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              To be honest it made sense. Wally had a (much) better fixture and was mostly considered a short term replacement for Rich, so the price rise helped. Maddison is more of a long term option.

              1. Demel
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 8 months ago

                For me if I can put a 6.5m player who will score consistent points and a team is built around him (and he is on set pieces) then owning him over a player who is hugely streaky is a no brainer. I do think too many people just go template and don't allow themselves an opinion.

    2. King Kohli
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Easy save

    3. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Team is fine dude

  9. Slurpy
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Decent day but where do I go with this? Got 1.5m ITB.
    Hart
    Mendy Alonso TAA
    Salah Hazard Walcott Maddison
    Ings Mitro Aguero

    Stek Tomkins AWB Stephens

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I would be monitoring Walcotts injury and doing nothing for the duration of the int break.

    2. King Kohli
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Save FY

  10. SkeletONv01
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Sell Salah, buy Hazard, i DARE you :> Is it me or is Hazard one of the most overpriced players in this game? Or is it nostalgia googles?

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I have owned Hazard since GW2. He has scored me the following points. 4, 8, 11.

      I think he is priced fairly.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      inconsistent usually...but...he has a manager who likes to attack=jizz

    3. Netley Lucas
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcb7VqrFY6E

      Haz is a class act, is he a Mo? No, but he's 10.6 and is a potential cap option too

      1. Zilla
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        That's why I don't want to sell Mane or Salah for him

  11. arndff_
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    * After a strong 17/18 season, this one so far looks like this:

    > Eriksen over Mane right before the GW1 deadline
    GW2: Switched the captaincy from Aguero to Salah on Saturday [Guardian news]
    GW2: Peltier didn’t play, AWB off the bench with a red
    GW3/4: Richarlison injured, bought Walcott
    GW4: Picked AWB over Ings

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      same last 2

      1. Evil Greg
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        *last 3

      2. arndff_
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        First 2 hurt much more.

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          luckily did the exact opposite of those.

    2. maditass
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Picking awb over ings was a really terrible decision by you. So the one to blame is yourself :-). Walcott has forever been a troll, so be happy for the extra team value that you got from it

      Tbh, all those decisions was fully your own responsibility and nobody else when I think of it :-).

      1. arndff_
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Okay, seems like you’re an expert. Good for the community.

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          not playing defenders over attackers again unless it's benteke.

          1. arndff_
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            Know that it’s better to play attacker over defender but this time was a bit different.

            1. bench boost for every gamew…
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              On paper i agree with your reasoning playing Wan Bissaka. No certain reports beforehand that Tomkins was out, and Zaha is important to the team also defense wise, as he requires more attention from the opposition, thus making Palace team better in total.

        2. maditass
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          In the end it's always YOU that make a decision and in these cases its been bad ones. Southampton has looked decent and Ings is a good striker. If i had the choice between selecting AWB and Ings, i would play Ings everytime because CP is bad defensively and without Zaha and Tomkins, they are pretty horrible.

          Mane vs Eriksen is a main attacking player vs a deep playing player and was a pretty obvious choice (i have neither).
          Walcott has never been good and with Everton's best player suspended, he would defenitely not be any better without him
          Thinking a 4m player would be nailed is pretty naive and relying on a player that cheap is never a good decision 🙂
          GW 2 cap sucks, but salah could have scored a few that match and all would be forgotten (i myself did the wrong decision and took salah over aguero, but that was the decision I made that GW).

          We all do bad decisions, but blaming everything else than yourself is also a bad decision 🙂

          1. arndff_
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            Who did I blame?

          2. ChristoBisto
            • 8 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            He wasn't blaming anyone else.

          3. ChristoBisto
            • 8 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            Also a lot of your comments are easy to make with the benefit of hindsight. Palace have looked great and prior to yesterday Southampton had not won.

          4. captainjilflex
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            I must have missed Southampton looking decent. They havnt. Also we didnt find out Zaha was injured till after the deadline. Think your being a bit harsh. And you made the worst decision of all switching the (c) on gw2, on an unfounded journalists comment. Yes there is skill involved in this game but ultimately its luck and largely out of our hands.

            1. maditass
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              I actually never had Aguero as cap at GW2, so what the journalist said had nothing to say on who i choosed to be my cap that round 🙂

              And sorry if i look like a big jerk, that wasn't my intention and seems i misunderstood his statements as it looked like he didn't take the responsibility of his own bad decisions. Some of them were obvious and other not that obvious and all in all its just pure luck i know. But those that are always top 10k isn't purely there cause of luck every year

              1. arndff_
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 8 months ago

                Why the hell are you talking about past season finishes???

                * Here’s my history:
                https://fantasy.premierleague.com/a/entry/1000/history

                And now what?

                1. arndff_
                  • 12 Years
                  5 years, 8 months ago

                  Season history

                  Season Points Rank
                  2009/10 2,031 352,205
                  2010/11 1,930 212,511
                  2011/12 2,202 5,080

                  2016/17 2,307 9,917
                  2017/18 2,390 750

          5. arndff_
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            On one hand, Hodgson didn’t say anything about Tomkins, Zaha at his press conf. AWB played strong at GW1 and 2 as well. Palace had a home game and were considered as favorites.
            On the other hand, Southamtpon werent looking good and Ings had a bad blister (75%), so their manager told that “a late call will be made”.

            Eriksen vs Mane was a close call too — Tottenham had two easy games on paper vs Newcastle, Fulham. Both mids were at the same price bracket and the latter was very lucky for most of his goals.

            Peltier was nailed on last season and has been considered to be nailed on again.

            I was on Kun until Sat when I read these news — such articles are very bad at all.

            Next time, don’t reply because you know nothing.

            1. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              Some decisions work out, some don’t ... i went Eriksen over Mane too and I didn’t even own Kun for his hattie 🙂

              Ings had some great stats though so surprised you played a defender

              Top 10k beckons for you because you think things through and more often than not you will get the breaks and luck needed in this game 🙂

            2. maditass
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              Tomkins missed the game against Watford also, so we already knew he was injured before the game.

              Southampton had some big chances in the woodwork by Ings and a yellow marked Ings is still better than a 4m CP defender anytime. And if he wouldnt play, the 4m sub would still get on.

              We knew Eriksen is playing deep for Spurs so it was a risk to take him over mane knowing that Liverpool had a great pre-season and have one of the best attacks in PL.

              I dont really know much about Cardiff, but didnt they get a new defender or two before the season? anyway, a 4m player has that price for a reason. AWB is just a fluke and i guess wrongly priced.

              Not thinking Kun would play that game and getting influenced by a The Sun article is 100% a bad decision to base your cap choice on either way.

              I will reply whenever i feel like it and seems i know more than you think 🙂

      2. Deli Alli OxenFree!
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        With that attitude/opinions mate; I hope you’re in the top 50, or have never picked the wrong side of a 50/50!
        (PS. Can u honestly say that Southampton look like a better team than Palace? ...especially pre-match)

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          Raised by various rodents.

    3. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      So similar here mate, feel the pain!
      Pretty much taking the “it’s only a game” stance now...lol

    4. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Feel for u mate.

  12. yakirh
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Got 1 FT
    Was planning to get Hazard, but I think I have bigger problems now
    What should be my main priority?

    Fab Foster
    Mendy Alonso Robbo Shaw AWB
    Salah Mane Mkhi Walcott* Cairney*
    Aguero Zaha* Kamara

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Monitor over these 2 weeks and see how Zaha and Walcott are. They look to be the 2 immediate potential issues.

  13. mlm
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Emerson
    Robertson alonso mendy (wan bissaka, peltier)
    Salah mane mkhit fraser (stephen)
    Aguero zaha wilson

    1) Salah to hazard
    2) save ft

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      If Zaha is injured long term then him and Mane to Hazard and Ings would tempt me.

  14. foreverton
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    A) AWB vs. Huddersfield (A)

    B) Chilwell vs. Bournemouth (A)

    1. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Chilwell. I think both games will have goals and Chilwell looks good going forward.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      BBB

  15. 420king
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    So I'm the only one considering benching a premium defender for a 4.0 AGAIN?

    1. 420king
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Was almost a disaster the first time, though.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      not again

      1. 420king
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        You too, or just implying I should have learned by now? 😛

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          mine was WB over Ings

          1. 420king
            • 9 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            Mine was WB over Mendy on GW1. Was great, until Mendy played...

            1. Evil Greg
              • 14 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              there was logic there!

              1. 420king
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 8 months ago

                Just didn't see a CS there. Funny enough, it was the only game they got it so far 😛

                1. Evil Greg
                  • 14 Years
                  5 years, 8 months ago

                  So glad I didn't get Ederson

    3. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Robertson over AWB if that is what you are getting at.

      1. 420king
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Was thinking Bennett but WB would work for me too.

        1. Demel
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          Robertson for his attacking threat alone should be in for me.

          1. Demel
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            And I own Docherty and AWB so am in the same boat as you.

            1. 420king
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 8 months ago

              I know what you mean but I'm still not convinced. Thanks though 🙂

  16. Taegugk Warrior
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Is Now Best time for wild card...?

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      many others will, are you sheep?

      1. Rojo's Modern Life
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Awful logic. Common decision =\= bad decision.

    2. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Not for me. Right now I wouldn't change a player in my team (Well maybe a couple). It all depends on your team.

    3. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      There’s no best time, just as and when you want to.

    4. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Best time is gwk20

      1. Demel
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        That is the time I have pencilled in. Things do change quickly but no knee jerking WC for me.

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          I ain't doing it until I have to or my team is f*cked.

    5. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Yeah, I hate to single u out(it’s not the case mate)...
      But I really am sick of these “Best time to WC” Comments/?’s!
      Honestly, what response are u looking for: “Yes, It def is the best time for YOU to Wildcard” ?
      ...and would u even care/believe what they said? come on.
      Traditionally, Int.Breaks are the best time for WC’s(cause 2 week’s to catch a Pice Rise)—but so far, doesn’t feel like many Bandwagons are driving by.
      ....Maybe after Mkhi scores a brave tomorrow? Lol

      1. Taegugk Warrior
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        OK thanks... i just want to know when traditionally WC activated. I just think WC is usefull in Boxingday... Not considering about intl.breaks...

    6. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      There is no best time - but a good time is when your team is pants

  17. APN
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Heard Yedlin scored......He plays at right back, right ? Was his goal due to any defensive lapse by Mendy ? Need to know how Mendy is doing with his defensive duties.

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Mendy was miles outta position...jesus tried covering him. 2bh it was all round lazy from city, they didn't expect to concede. Don't expect Pep to ignore it

      1. Deli Alli OxenFree!
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Wasn’t Mendy in the center, covering/playing CB?

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          yes.

      2. Deli Alli OxenFree!
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        After re-watching the goal, I do agree with your comment completely

    2. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      From an FPL pov it is almost irrelevant how Mendy is doing defensively. Pep will keep playing him for the attacking upside he brings.

      1. Evil Greg
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        +1

    3. Differential C (Mark)
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Mendy was invisible, high up the pitch as usual. But was an intelligent run to the backpost tbf. Jesus had to cover that left side, and he lost the footrace with Yedlin.

    4. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Not sure who exactly was to blame for the goal, tbh...
      City had a good defensive shape as NEW countered. Mendy was basically covering/playing Centerback, and seemed like he had the correct position imo—cutting out angle of the low-cross, and ready to challenge the centerforward(think was Perez), that stood at the top-center of the box
      The strange thing, or problem was that Jesus was the player who was actually tracking back & covering Yedlin, and playing catch-up for the entire sprint...
      After that, it was really just a superb pass from Rondon, that hit Yedlin right in his stride, and Ederson got beat(taking away 2 CS’s & prob bonus pts away from me in the process)
      So, didn’t feel like mendy’s fault to me; but all that is just my opinion (and I haven’t watched MoTD yet either)

    5. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Sorry, just watched it again (which u should do, tbh...lol search ‘Yedlin goal vs City’ on YouTube and u got options); and the City back line was f’ing up.
      Mendy was the last man(and could be argued that was actually in the correct position), but Stones & Mendy should have shuffled over & been a few yards to the left. Then Stones would’ve been CB and Mendy would be in position to meet/stop Yedlin’s run down...
      However, like others said, who cares about Mendy’s defense!—he’s basically an attacking midfielder(that can also get defender CS-pts, as an extra perk...lol)

      1. APN
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        I watched the goal now. Agreed that Mendy's clean sheet is like bonus you can expect from him.

    6. PastaFasul
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Mendy wasn't within that half of the pitch, Jesus did his best to track back and defend but he's not as quick as Yedlin.

  18. Differential C (Mark)
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    That feeling when you opted for Bellerin over Robbo and Monreal.
    If Lichtsteiner starts. . . ..

  19. Taegugk Warrior
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Would yo WC this team...?
    Only have 1 FT.

    Patricio
    Robo/Mendy/Wan Bissaka
    Salah/Mane/Pedro/Mikhi
    Aguero/King/Zaha

    Subs: Begovic/Kabasele/Cairney(!)/Peltier

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Definitely not.

      1. Taegugk Warrior
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Ok Thanks... highly appreciate with your respon.... cheerss...!!!

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          :mrgreen:

    2. mojoindojo
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Why? Only concern is bench.

      1. Taegugk Warrior
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Want to use 1FT wisely...
        Considering between transfer out Cairney to Transfer in 5.3 mid... or strengthen the Starting line up

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          ignore strengthening your bench, it's useless until WC

    3. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Looks good to me(better than mine, tbh...lol)
      As for your FT, def wait until Sunday’s Matches, but then maybe think about King>>Mitrovic? (would be bang-on template)

      1. Taegugk Warrior
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Will zaha likely to play in the next gameweek...

  20. mojoindojo
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Play one:

    A. Shaw(wat)
    B. Robertson (tot)
    C. AWB (hud)

    1. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      b

  21. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    What to do here?
    Patricio(Button)
    Alonso Mendy Robertson Wan Bisaka (Tomkins)
    Salah Mane Mkhi Jota Walcott
    Aguero King(Kamara)
    1 ft 0.1 itb

  22. R.C
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Mark is still struggling despite his wc eh?

    1. IRBOX ⚽
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      He’s having a mare!

      1. Evil Greg
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        he will finish top 20k 100%

        patience is the game.

        1. Demel
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          Very true.

  23. King Klopp
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Salah to Hazard now and the back to Salah in GW 9 sound good?

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      It's bold, but could easily pay off.

    2. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      remember what Az said...flip liverpool's fixtures....you gotta wait 1 more game.

      1. King Klopp
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Hazard at home to Cardiff is looking so good though

        1. Evil Greg
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          Cardiff play wierd 90's Warnock tactics though...not a gimme.

          1. King Klopp
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 8 months ago

            yea but not sure they can do it against Chelsea. An early goal and Chelsea could go big

    3. Demel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      No Salah at home to Saints is risky.

      1. Evil Greg
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        It's important to analyze Pool against Spurs before anyone considers Salah out.

        1. Pieterke30
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          There is nothing to analyse anymore: Salah IS much more dangerous than Mané. 3.5 more dangerous? Almost, yes. No need to wait for Sours game to see that, and it wont change.

          Problem is: Salah misses 75% of chances, and Mané scores every little chance he has (almost). Which means Salah never gets bonus, and Mané always does.

          So far, Salah-less teams with Mané have been the big winners. They have been very lucky so far. Can that luck last? For how long? It better change quickly or us with just Salah and no Mané will have our season ruined. Ruined because we believed too long in last season’s top scorer.

    4. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      If ever, now is the time to sell Salah

    5. PastaFasul
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      That was my thought...could have Salah, Mane, ,Hazard, Fraser mid but it would be Aguero, Wilson up front and the Holy Trinity plus AWB in a 442 with no flexibility if injuries or rotations.

  24. FlockofSeagulls
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    I'm going to avoid the temptation and go against the grain by making no transfers this gw and reassess things next gw with 2 free transfers.

    Freaky I know. 🙂

    1. Evil Greg
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      If only everyone could do this! gonna be some serious jerking this week. ppl need to wait a bit, go outside for a couple of weeks!

      1. FlockofSeagulls
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        I'm not like everyone else.

        I'm Batman. 😉

        1. 420king
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          You're more like Seagullman.

      2. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        the internet exists outside too

    2. Zilla
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Yeah I think I might do that, the only player I want is Hazard but not sure if I want to sell Salah/Mane.

  25. S.Kuqi
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Lol. 4 gws gone and 60 points behind overall leader altough those chips skew a bit

    1. NATSTER
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I have rarely checked the overall leader as, after a few gameweeks, it's usually irrelevant to me anymore.

      Haha

    2. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      humble brag

      1. S.Kuqi
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        😉

  26. maratus
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Morning lads! Wc this ?

    Ederson (Hamer!)
    Mendy, TAA, Tomkins!, (WB, Kabalese)
    Salah, Mane, Pogba, Moura (Stephens)
    Aguero, King, Zaha

    To this:

    Foster/Fabianski
    Alonso, Mendy, Cedric, Boly, Wan Bissaka
    Hazard, Mane, Fraser, Pereyra, Guendouzi
    Kane, Aguero, Ings

    1. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Dont wc. Just pogba & tomkins for Fraser & Alonso

      1. LD
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        This.

    2. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      moura taa to alonso fraser

    3. NATSTER
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I'm with Fab / Foster and looking for a way out if I do WC.

      1. King Klopp
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        With them as well, as long as Fab is picking up save points I am content

        1. PastaFasul
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          Patricio/ Hennessy rotation looks pretty good for a while

    4. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Got a full-on switchup of your team, but doesn’t feel like a WC-worthy amount of important changes, imo
      Wait till the final gw4 Matches, but u can prob achieve a similar team; for free, over 2-3 week’s of Transfers (especially since LFC plays Spurs next GW!
      ...maybe something like:
      GW5] Tompkins/Salah>> Hazard/Alonso
      GW6] Pogba/Zaha >> Pereyra/Kane

    5. maratus
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Thanks all!

  27. Rhinos
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Prediction time, the default sheepy transfer this week will be theo to lingard

    1. King Klopp
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      I'm thinking Zaha/Arnie to Mitrovic

      1. NATSTER
        • 13 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Yeah. Mitrovic is the one under spotlight now.

    2. fedolefan
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      This better come true.

    3. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Agree w/ King Klopp
      so far this week, the Bandwagon Default Trans will def be:
      Mitro

      1. Deli Alli OxenFree!
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        [Sorry, cut off rest of my post]
        Mitro

      2. Deli Alli OxenFree!
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Wow...FFS def doesn’t like my ‘>’ Symbols or something?
        IN: MITRO
        OUT: Zaha/King/Arnie/etc

  28. FlockofSeagulls
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    If I was going to make any transfers, which I'm not, but if I was I'd be bringing in Kane, Vardy and Pogba before even looking in Hazard's direction.

    1. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      he's only produced in every single game despite 2 cameos so i think your gps is knackered

      1. 420king
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        ^^ Animal battle ^^

        1. Deli Alli OxenFree!
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          LMAO!
          A Rhino might not be able to win that one, but it would def NOT Lose!
          So, a Nil-Nil snoozer, imo..lol

    2. King Klopp
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      His form and fixtures make him hard not to pick

  29. S.Kuqi
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    If Theo is out. Fraser looks to be best replacement.

    1. 420king
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Nah.

      1. S.Kuqi
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        Cheap, good fixtures and looked dangerous against Chelsea.

        Bad pick because he hasnt scored in two gws? 😉

        1. 420king
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 8 months ago

          No but looks to have lost some set pieces, I'm thinking either Maddison or wait a week and get Rich back.

    2. NATSTER
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      Maddison looks good too

      1. S.Kuqi
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 8 months ago

        He is other good option for sure

    3. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      There are a LOT of good options/replacements around that Price-Point!
      IMO, too many for there to be a ‘best replacement’; it’ll depend on the rest of your team, on a case-by-case basis

  30. Salahlulijah
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 8 months ago

    Morning all, who would you have:
    A- Hazard & Vardy
    B- Kane & Mkhi

    1. Deli Alli OxenFree!
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 8 months ago

      First Thought was A for sure...
      but def need to wait until Mkhi/Kane play for proper decision