Opinion

The Digest – Gameweek 2

We take out final glance back at Gameweek 2 this lunchtime. City’s forgotten forward and Tottenham’s form under the new man in charge come under discussion, whilst we also look at the need to afford our players the chance to find their feet before pressing the “transfer out” button.

The Player

Stevan Jovetic’s double at home to Liverpool brings the City forward into focus after last night’s win over the Merseysiders. There were concerns surrounding the Montenegro man’s pitch time as Sergio Aguero edged towards full fitness but he was once again handed a start alongside Edin Dzeko and displayed the type of deadly finishing that served up 27 goals, in addition to 12 assists, over his final two years in Italy with Fiorentina.

Despite scoring five times in pre-season, Jovetic was largely overlooked as the campaign got underway and sat in less than 5% of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) teams for the encounter with Brendan Rodgers’ side. By the time the match finished, he’d leapt onto Fantasy radars with a two-goal salvo that earned his manager’s post-match praise and, with a home clash against travel-sick Stoke up next, seems poised for major investment.

Granted, as the campaign unfolds, there’s no doubt that Jovetic will succumb to his manager’s rotational whims but right now, the situation seems in his favour. With Alvaro Negredo injured, Aguero not yet 100% and Dzeko limping off with a leg problem last night, he certainly looks a strong contender for our three-man frontlines. At a time when many of the mid-price frontmen (Emmanuel Adebayor aside) have failed to convince, Jovetic, at just 7.9 in FPL, looks a very tempting route into an attack that racked up 101 goals in its way to the title last term.

The Team

A 4-0 demolition of QPR in Mauricio Pochettino’s first home match at the Tottenham helm underlined the Fantasy potential on offer at the north London club. The Argentine’s impact has been immediate since rolling up to the Lane and his high pressing approach is already reaping reward, offering Fantasy managers prospects right across the pitch.

Whilst the second half of last season saw Christian Eriksen as the sole option in the Spurs midfield, Pochettino’s arrival looks to have furthered our options in the centre of the park. Nacer Chadli managed a single goal last season and has already bettered that tally with a brace against Harry Redknapp’s side – priced at just 6.0 in FPL, the Belgian looks a real mid-price alternative if he can nail down a starting berth in the attacking midfield three. Erik Lamela’s pair of assists suggests he, too, could be set for a turnaround in fortunes, while Emmanuel Adebayor could be the pick of the mid-price forwards if he kicks on from his goal and assist against the R’s.

At the back, Spurs have been quick to hint at the resilience that helped Southampton earn 15 shut-outs under Pellegrini in 2013/14. Back-to-back goals from Eric Dier has ensured the summer signing earns most of the Fantasy attention as his ownership climbs past 10%, though it’s yet to be seen just where he stands in the pecking order once Pochettino has a fully-fit quota of defenders to choose from. Jan Vertonghen is a pricier option but if his manager’s magic touch can unlock the goal threat that saw him net five times in his debut season, the Belgian could be another Tottenham alternative arriving on our radars shortly.

The Talking Point

Jovetic’s double against Liverpool merely underlines the need to afford our squads a little more patience as the season gets up and running. For some, weeks of careful planning and preparation were thrown to one side after Gameweek 1, as more than 152,000 wildcards were wielded after just a single round of action.

After their win over Newcastle, City were poised for three home matches in four, yet Jovetic, as their form forward (and the only one with a full pre-season behind him), was cast aside by over 24,000 Fantasy managers after blanking at St James’ Park and suffered a drop in price. At such a favourable cost, the scramble is now on for his signature ahead of the Stoke clash, with over 76,000 already transferring him in.

In midfield, many lost patience with Juan Mata and Eden Hazard – two proven Premier League big-hitters. Offloaded by 94,000 FPL owners last week, Mata subsequently notched his seventh goal in eight league outings in the 1-1 draw at Sunderland. Hazard, meanwhile, was sold by nearly 50,000 managers ahead of a plum home clash against Leicester – bearing in mind the Belgian had scored 10 of his 14 strikes at the Bridge last season, there was something of an inevitability about his goal against The Foxes.

With player prices appearing to take longer to change in this season’s FPL game so far, there have been fewer fluctuations than ever in the market – essentially, this is allowing us the chance to stick to our guns and follow through on our long-term planning. Granted, while following the bandwagons, such as Gylfi Sigurdsson, can pay off handsomely, reining in our knee-jerk reactions and maintaining courage in our initial convictions can prove the wisest move.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

2,239 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Moin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    So My Team:

    Mignolet

    Cahill // P.Jones // Isla // PvA // Moore

    Silva // Sterling // Hazard // Lamela // Davis

    Rooney // Riviere // Wickham

    Have 2 FTs thinking of using only 1FT..and also have 1m in the bank.....Thinking of doing Davis to a 4.5 mid...

    1. Shifty
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Will Riviere play with De Jong likely to be back?

      1. J_J
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yes
        DE Jong will play as Cam

    2. Gazpilicueta
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Marney

      1. Moin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        yup thinking the same

    3. Kew Pee Arr
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Ropey defence. Jones & Isla not good choices at the mo. Look at new/villa/spurs/saints. Consider upgrading Riv or Wick as you've not much upfront.

      1. Kew Pee Arr
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Poor choice of keeper too .

        1. Moin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          thanks!

          1. Kew Pee Arr
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Liverpool not looking good at the back!

  2. Fifa las vegas
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What do you (who are interested) think of making a nice basic first app on 'app inventor' by MIT?

    1. Exilizer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      An APP for what?

      1. Fifa las vegas
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I don't know yet 😳

        1. XhakaCan
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Something fantasy football-related, perhaps? 🙂

  3. TINO TINO GIVE US A WAVE
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    JOVETIC or ROONEY for captain this week??

    1. Fifa las vegas
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Rooney

      Di Maria and Mata with all the service 😎

    2. Not Irish
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Jovetic 😎

  4. Twelve years a slave
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    See many bringing in Jovetic
    Problem is after the stoke game there two very tricky fixtures and by then Aguero will be 100% Jovetic may well still start most games but there will always be that uncertainty. Plus champions league rotation will soon kick in

    1. Willis.
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      The only difficult fixture is the Chelsea one.

      1. Chu Young Ping Pong
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        😀

    2. Not Irish
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Fixtures don't concern me if Jovetic is firing. He's twice the player Dzeko/Negredo are.

      1. Frank Black
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        LOL.

        1. The Machine
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He's right

    3. Dr Dream
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      That' ok...Remy will be an Arsenal player by then...Jovetic > Remy....

  5. Fifa las vegas
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Anyone have any ideas of an app, that could make for an interesting science experiment?

    Really need help..

    1. Alan Hansen's Emu
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Price rise/ fall alert app

  6. Jonny Sutt
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Aguero and costa r gona be the front runners for golden boot surely. I'm gona make sure I have the cash ready for kin once his game time increases. What do we think guys?

    1. Jonny Sutt
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Kun*

    2. Not Irish
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      The overrating of Costa is crazy.

      1. Willis.
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        🙄

  7. Woy
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Because bojan is injured, wouldnt it be worth in fact keeping? Yellow flag will stop price drop and then he'll be back in for Leicester game?

    1. Kew Pee Arr
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      He's a poor choice anyway, so it hardly matters

    2. Deano
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      There's no injury, just an excuse for Sparky to drop him.

    3. BRONALDINHO
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      So yellow flags protect from price drops? wish I knew this a few days ago...

  8. 42towels
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    I have 1FT, 0.5 in the bank, Roo+Costa, and Davis+Mutch as 4th/5th mids.

    A) Sturridge -> Aguero for the FT

    B) Sturridge -> Jovetic ( and plan to get Sterling in next week)

    C) Sturridge -> Jovetic + Mutch -> Sterling (-4)

    D) Save FT (and suffer the price swings)

    Thanks!

    1. Not Irish
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Surely there are better options to sell than Sturridge if you're bring Jovetic in.

      1. 42towels
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        And the better options would be...

        1. Not Irish
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Costa

          1. 42towels
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Thanks, but I think Costa will be a consistent armband option.

            Which of the above 4 options would you pick?

            1. Not Irish
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              D

          2. Kew Pee Arr
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            He's over rated

            1. JAEAESKELAEINEN
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              And why exactly is that?

  9. Rivaldo Izback
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What's ur Top 5 Over-Priced (OP) Players in FPL and Top 5 Under-Priced (UP)? Mine is:

    OP: 1- Sanchez (10.5) / 2- Balotelli (10) / 3- RVP (12.5) / 4- Lallana (8.5) / 5- Coleman (7.0) /
    UP: 1- Siggy (6.0) / 2- Hutton - (4.0) / 3- Chamakh (5.5) / 4- Vaz Te (4.5) / 5- Albrighton (4.5)

    1. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      No Andros Townsend (6.5)?

      1. pompeyfan
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        yeah, he's at least 1m overpriced

      2. Rivaldo Izback
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        You mean Overrated? 😀 😀

    2. Irish Madridista ⭐
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      OP

      RVP
      Cazorla
      Yaya
      Sturridge
      Sanchez

      UP

      Siggy
      Lamela
      Jovetic
      Naismith
      De Jong or Tadic

      1. Rivaldo Izback
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        You really think Lamela 8 is U-P.. Quality player but it's the right price imo..

        1. Irish Madridista ⭐
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I think he'll show it up this season.. 9.0 mill player. Same with Eriksen probably.

          Not sure how Lamela and Eriksen are both cheaper than Santi Cazorla, Willian and Nasri

          1. Rivaldo Izback
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I agree but I think that Santi Willian And Nasri are O-P

        2. Kew Pee Arr
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He's overpriced given he did sweet FA all last year - should be 6.5/7

          1. Irish Madridista ⭐
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            It's not all about last year man...

    3. J_J
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      OP 1 - Sanchez 2 - RVP 3 - Sturridge 4 - Balotelli 5 - Yaya
      UP 1 - Siggy 2 - Giroud 3 - Eriksen 4 - Hazard 5 - Naismith

      1. Rivaldo Izback
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        You want Hazard to be 11? 12?

        1. J_J
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I say Hazard as Sanchez is 10.5 and Hazard has already performed on FPL level to at least get a similar pricing to Sanchez

  10. Venom Snake
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Mata/Dzeko to de Jong/Aguero -4?

    Begovic
    Kelly - Clyne - PvA
    Eriksen - Mata - Siggy - Ramsey
    Dzeko - Costa - Rooney

    Gilks -- Marney - Ferdinand - Chester

    1. Not Irish
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Bringing Aguero in before international break is crazy.

      1. Venom Snake
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I might be just crazy enough to do it 😉

        1. Not Irish
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Selling Mata a good move though. Hazard would be a good choice. 😀

          To be honest I would hold Dzeko for now.

    2. the cromulent one
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Not crazy.
      Might not pay off immediately, but could be gold in the long-term.

    3. Shifty
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I have both Mata and Dzeko, considering selling too but feel abit uneasy about doing it. What's making you consider it?

      1. Venom Snake
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Have lost all faith in United, happy to keep Rooney for now as he's probably best source of points. ADM + any other potential signings has me worried about their formations also.
        Kun in for Dzeko needs no explaining

  11. FootballManiac
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Is Kaboul nailed on for a while?if not who is a threat to his position?

    1. HUMZAH96
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Maybe when Walker comes back Dier moves to CB with Vertong

    2. Jonny Sutt
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      B for me

    3. Tim Canterbury
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Who are all the players in this picture?

      http://u.goal.com/340600/340677_heroa.jpg

      1. Chu Young Ping Pong
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        ??

        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        maxi rodriguez, di maria, aguero, lamela, messi, lavezzi
        (left to right)

      2. Willis.
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Maxi, Di Maria, Aguero, Lamela, Messi, Lavezzi

      3. Somalion
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Lavezzi, Messi, Lamela, Aguero, Di Maria, Maxi Rodriguez.

      4. Obi Wan Elokobi
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Maxi Rodriguez, Angel Di Maria, Sergio Aguero, Erik Lamela, Lionel Messi and Ezequiel Lavezzi. I believe anyway

      5. Irish Madridista ⭐
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        The best 5 a side team in history.. and Maxi Rodriguez.

    4. Bøwstring The Carp
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Gotta agree with Daniel to be honest.

      Everyone attacks City and Chelsea for "buying the league" but when United's net spending slowly becomes one of the worst in Europe over the last few years nobody bats an eyelid.

      United's net spending over the last 4 seasons
      2014/15 net - £125mil spent (so far)
      2013/14 net - £61mil spent
      2012/13 net - £48mil spent
      2011/12 net - £25mil spent
      2010/11 net - £15mil spent

      1. Bøwstring The Carp
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        5 seasons*

        1. Somalion
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Can I just make the point that a lot of United's revenue is earned via marketing and deals. Sure their new kit deal is worth something like £70-80 million a season. Chevrolet's deal with them is worth £47 million a year. That's big money already just from those two deals.

          City for example are owned by Sheikh Monsour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. City are sponsored by Etihad airways, a company established by the United Arab Emirates.

      2. Kostja
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Prices would not be so inflated though without teams like that

        1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          The world record fee was £50 million for Zidane before City or Chelsea came along . There are plenty of absurd transfer fees before that aswell . Chelsea's record fee is still £50 mill and I don't think City have even spent that much on a single transfer either .

      3. The Chosen One...
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        United's money is earned through revenue while City and Chelsea just use Russian and Arab oil money

          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          this

        1. Not Irish
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Also this. We're not some plastic sham of a club.

        2. Bøwstring The Carp
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Should it really matter whether its coming from revenue or an oil merchant?

          Spending is spending.

          1. Not Irish
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Not if you're a tiresome ABU tin foil hat wearer, no.

          2. The Chosen One...
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            if you've made the money you have the right to spending it. different to just being handed a war chest imo

            1. Bøwstring The Carp
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Oil merchant vs. £750mil Adidas deal.

              All the same in my eyes.

              If United spend £135mil so far recouping just under £10mil imo that's buying the league regardless of where the money comes from

              1. Kostja
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                All teams have shirt deals though, and you only get them after developing a brand for decades, not out of thin air

                1. pompeyfan
                  • 14 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Man City an Chelsea did exist before this millennium by the way. Ridiculous to say their brands came out of thin air

                  1. Kostja
                    • 12 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    I know, but I suggest you rwad soccernomics, Chelsea got 90% of their fan base with abramovic, city is even worse. Basically entire fanbase of bandqagoners, sorry to any real fans

                2. Bøwstring The Carp
                  • 12 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Well either way there's two arguments being thrown out that don't wash with me.

                  1) United are on their way to spending more in net than City have when the Sheikh took over. At thistime, City were accused of buying the league, but know that United are making the exact same type of spending, it is somehow different for Manchester United.

                  2) Arguments here suggest United are generating more money than City and Chelsea, so its okay for them to spend. Then others say City and Chelsea have cash injection so United cannot compete financially. Which is it? Either you make more on revenue than your rivals or you don't? Either way I don't really care for the details of where the money comes from. If you have a high net spending you are buying the league in my opinion, whether you are Chelsea, United, City or anyone else. Liverpool have spent a lot this summer, but only because they can from the Suarez deal, hence their net is low despite spending nearly the same as United.

                  1. Bøwstring The Carp
                    • 12 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    Sorry for the few typos

                  2. Kostja
                    • 12 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    I agree with you, you are missing the point that guys like abramovich and city owners created the landscape of huge money needwd to win, with fergie gone, unites have turned into the same bunch of brainless football managment

                    1. Bøwstring The Carp
                      • 12 Years
                      9 years, 9 months ago

                      FFP attempts to nullify this though, you can even see the sharp drop in Chelsea and City's spending this season as an effect.

                      City have £32mil net spent this year and Chelsea have roughly £0mil net. Compared to last year when they had £63mil and £87mil respectively.

                      1. Bøwstring The Carp
                        • 12 Years
                        9 years, 9 months ago

                        Chelsea (£63mil) and City (£87mil) sorry

        3. FootballManiac
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Yet united are on 500m debt

          1. Kostja
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Not anymore, your data is a few years outdated

            1. FootballManiac
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              United created a lot of revenue by finishing mid table last season right?

              1. Kostja
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Nope they pretty much erased their debt with world record shirt and kit deals

            2. FootballManiac
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Are you seriously defending united spending is ok but city and Chelsea spending is not right?if a owner of a club wants to spend money so be it.its just jealousy.

              1. Kostja
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Not really, the game has just been changed by the big teams, no more developing young promising players, just buying readymade stars. What choice do united have than? They dont want do end up like liverpool or arsenal

                1. WipWapJaws
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  I feel like players are still being developed but instead of getting game time at their EPL clubs they are being farmed off to lower divisions more often

                2. FootballManiac
                  • 11 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Yes I am not against united spending but I'm against united fans point out Chelsea and city about their spending while they are doing the same.so stop the crap.if you think city and Chelsea are trying to buy the league then so are united.end of....

            3. Kew Pee Arr
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              It's £380M - just a few pennies then.

          2. Not Irish
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            No. We're not.

            1. pompeyfan
              • 14 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              oh sorry, it's 'only' £350m now.

              1. Not Irish
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Have a look at our revenue when the quarterly report comes out.

        4. pompeyfan
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          regardless of how City or Chelsea do business you cannot defend the Man Utd business model. All that debt, at least some other clubs are spending their own money

        5. tm245
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Pretty sure the homegrown model that served United in the 90s so well is a bit obsolete with the global nature of the sport, so who cares where the money comes from? United actually helped drive the globalization of the sport with their dynasty, so how can global revenues suddenly become unfair?

          1. The Chosen One...
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            City's money is not from global revenue. It's from the Shiekh's bank account

            1. tm245
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Sorry, I just don't get it.

            2. FootballManiac
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              But unfortunately there is no rule which says that an owner can't use his money to invest.end of the day it's all about how much you spend on players.no one cares about how the money come.

              1. The Chosen One...
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                that's why there's FFP. United can keep spending coz its from revenue whereas teams like City and PSG can't becoz the money isn't from revenue

              2. tm245
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Agree. Isn't the narrative of a wealthy owner coming in to turn around a team's fortunes one of the oldest in this or any other sport?

        6. WipWapJaws
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I dont see how it matters where the money is coming from

      4. Not Irish
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Go back five more years and you'll see how ridiculous an opinion this is.

        1. Bøwstring The Carp
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Sorry but City and Chelsea's net were never this bad, and when you look at the wages, United are actually spending slightly more than Chelsea, with City topping the list.

          1. Not Irish
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            No, we're not. We've just had a massive amount of wages come off the books with Rio, Vidic, Giggs and Evra all leaving at once.

            Typical ABU BS...

            1. Bøwstring The Carp
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              I'm not an ABU actually, I'm a neutral that criticises everyone equally.

              Check United's wages against Chelsea and get back to me.

              So are you saying United aren't trying to buy the league? At least give me a yes or no on that.

              1. Not Irish
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                It's a simplistic, ridiculous question. Not a fan of thinking in a vacuum. I'll pass.

                1. The Machine
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Yes then

                2. Bøwstring The Carp
                  • 12 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  If you can't answer a simple question well then surely it's not all that ridiculous?

                  Are United buying the league, or at least attempting to. YES.

                  1. FootballManiac
                    • 11 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    Well they need an excuse if dey lose out to city or Chelsea right?the excuse will be, we generate our own revenue to buy players but chelsea and united don't that's why we couldn't won't the league.

              2. Somalion
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Depends what you view as buying the league.

                United, in my view, are spending big because that is how football has gone. Aside from occasional "blips" such as Pool last season (even then, they didn't win it) it is big money that produces the best teams these days.

                Bayern, Chelsea, City, Real, PSG, Barcelona, all these clubs are spending big bucks. Bayern actually have a sound business model, as do most German teams. Even Arsenal are starting to spend a bit and Liverpool spent £117.4 million this Summer I believe (despite making a net lose circa £50 million the last two seasons running), Tottenham £100 million last summer. As a whole, the names I listed at the start of this paragraph will win the majority of the league titles in the coming years as well as the CL. If United want to get back to that level, they have to spend.

                1. Bøwstring The Carp
                  • 12 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Yes Liverpool have spent a lot but they've also made a lot on player transfers with Agger, Borini and Assaidi set to leave to bring their net to about £10-15mil spent.

                  Yet with a 2nd place finish their transfer budget would've easily been £30-40mil so they're still in the clear taking that into account.

                  I'm not having a go at who spends what,I just hate that people say "City spent £Xmil in net the year they won the league, ergo they bought the league" but when United do the exact same thing, everyone is quick to defend it with how United are spending profit, etc. It shouldn't matter whether the money being spent is oil money or sweatshop money, its large net spendings to try and win the league 😕

                  1. Somalion
                    • 14 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    Aye but as of last time I checked the club's actual finances were still in the negative with wages of staff etc.

                    I completely understand your point and I think the argument is somewhat misplaced. I don't care who buys what or spends what money really as long as their business model is actually up to snuff, Chelsea have gotten to that point, City have not yet but hopefully will and then I think it's all fine. I think the issue is that traditionally big clubs such as Liverpool or United, these days is that they spent a long time developing their brand and investment and someone like Sheikh Monsour can come in and within a season entirely change the club with massive, massive money. I think that grates on some and I can appreciate it from a certain view. But I think the arguments that both sides make tend to be full of holes and flaws.

      5. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        The excuse is Utd generate their own revenue and City and Chelsea rely on billionaire owners . In reality Utd fans do not like competition. Its essentially like supporting Liddle vs Aldi

      6. tm245
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Any complaining about spending among the top five clubs is off the mark, imo. Rich clubs calling other clubs too rich does not make much sense. Once you hit a certain budget spending wisely becomes as important as spending massively.

    5. KTBFFH06
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Dropping Giroud... 9.6 in the bank.
      Jovetic?
      Lukaku?
      Bony?

      Thoughts.. other options.

      1. Gazpilicueta
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Jovetic

      2. andres
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Between ade and jove for me

      3. Winston.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Ade or Jove...

    6. Woy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Bojan now flagged

    7. wagner is king
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      is azpilaqueta gonna prove ok for me, cant find the 0.5 for cahill???

      1. JAEAESKELAEINEN
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        how can you type the name that far off?! it's azspchiquilita!

        1. JAEAESKELAEINEN
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          and yes I think he will be a starter 😛

    8. andres
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Chadli, really??

    9. Atwood
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Thoughts on Lamela as a differential?

      1. HuttonDressedasLahm
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Chadli is an actual differential

      2. Exilizer
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Probs will drop coutinho in his favour.

      3. HUMZAH96
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Good risk to take, but not worth taking Eriksen out for him

        • Irish Madridista ⭐
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He's the man 😎 would have hated him if he blanked v QPR, but he was never going to blank v QPR 😎

      4. RubberDucky
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I dont believe the people who state the inclusion of Di Maria can only be a bad thing for Mata. (Trying to throw others off the scent)

          Di Maria will play wide of Mata, improve the creativity of Man Utd and assist in more points for Rooney RVP and Mata, Simples!

          1. HuttonDressedasLahm
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Well they "could" play 4-2-3-1 but they still need decent defenders and a decent DM

            Without that they still won't be great

            1. RubberDucky
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Well im assuming a few clean sheets in the next 4 games then Jones out of the squad!

                A weak defence could be good for the attacking aspects of Utd as need to score 4 to win a match! lol

            2. Kostja
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Only negative for matas gametime, if he plays it will be very good for him

            3. J_J
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              I cant see aproper role for ADM in a 3-5-2 other than in place of Mata
              Only other way to get them playing together is to completely change the formation as he will be useless as a rwb

          2. Gooner97
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Giroud to Costa for a hit?

          3. Winston.
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Eriksen or Sterling ?

            Liverpool's fixtures are turning better soon....in GW 4-15 they have only one difficult match...namely against Chelsea. But shoul I be worried about Ballotelli getting the points instead of Sterling?

            1. Frank Black
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Balotelli will get nothing.

          4. joe259
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Need help

            1. sterling or mata
            2. dzeko or jovetic?

          5. Nice to Finally Michu
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            What moves do you think are in order guys?

            Begovic (Gilks)
            Terry Clyne Kolarov Debuchy (PvA)
            Sigurdsson Ramsey Mata Sterling (Marney)
            Costa Rooney (Fletcher)

            2FT, 0,0 ITB

            I feel like I shouldn't be benching PvA or Fletcher against QPR but i'm not sure who to swap them for if anyone.

            As usual, all help is greatly appreciated

          6. Sadio
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            People selling Rooney for Jovetic... have you thought this through?

          7. CCaddy
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            punt on joel campbell?

            1. Kostja
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Sanogo could have simethong to do say about that

          8. Dr. Rog
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Trick to gaining team value is as much dodging bullets rather than boarding bandwagons. Lots of price falls this year. Amazingly, hardly any of the players have risen 0.2 yet (only Dier and Siggy so far), meaning protecting yourself against falls is going to be vital. I suspect a team value of 105m by the end will be doing well, like the good old days when the transfer system was 1x, 2x, 3x NTI target to progressively move up 0.1. in a game week before it went mental.

            With this in mind, on saturday, i transferred out Jovetic to avoid the fall and catch the Naismith rise (because i wanted to facilitate aguero anyway). Considering I wanted Ivan as well, and needed to kick out Chambers/Chester etc I wildcarded. Knowing that by monday i could reverse my errors if need be, and do so at a profit. With more information, I had the luxury of sidestepping the Jovetic fall and buying back 0.1 cheaper, as well as catching all the rises of my target players.

            By the end of the week, i hope to monetise 0.4m vs starting prices:
            Jovetic bought -0.1 cheaper
            Mata bought -0.1 cheaper
            Dier 0.1 trading in and out
            Clyne 0.1 trading in and out (bertrand is the better player)
            Cesc bought 0.1 more expensive (as his price rose in wk1)

            WC team is:
            Krul
            Ivan Bertrand PVA/Dummett (Hutton)
            Mata Fabregas Ramsey Sterling Siggy
            Aguero Jovetic (Naismith)

            1. Annie
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              how many hits?

              1. Annie
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                oh wildcard, hah nice.

            2. Dr Dream
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              As previous...The best way to increase the overall value of your team is to go for the fallers every week...not the risers. Do that for a few weeks and look how good your team is afterwards...This weeks choice is obviously Eriksen, but every week provides bargains from the inpatient crew or the injury list.

              1. Dr. Rog
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                indeed. the fallers you reap the benefit of the full fall, the risers, you only keep half.

            3. Obi Wan Elokobi
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Aguero and Jovetic is too much find 0.5 and get Adebayor

              1. Dr. Rog
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                got 0.8 waiting in the bank... whom would you rather have next week Jovetic (STK) or Adebayor (LIV)?

            4. rozzo
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              So you've used your wildcard, used multiple transfers and gained what? 0.5-1.0 team value?

              Whats your rank?

              Points win prizes not team value

          9. Koflok
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            a) Bojan Cahill -> Jovetic PVA

            or

            b) Bojan Debuchy -> Jovetic Bruce

            or

            c) Bojan Debuchy Begovic -> Jovetic PVA Krul (-4)

          10. leo_messi
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Cahill and Bojan -> Dummett and Jovetic for -4 pts

            or

            Bojan->Naismith for free??

            1. gravless
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              the free one

          11. happy-boys
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Cabella, De Jong or Tadic for Coutinho?

            1. Obi Wan Elokobi
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Tadic

            2. Irish Madridista ⭐
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              That's the million dollar question...

            3. Nice to Finally Michu
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Don't really like Cabella but I think Tadic just ahead of De Jong in my mind