Opinion

The Burning Question – When to Free Hit?

The mourning period was suitably brief when Fantasy Premier League (FPL) announced the demise of the unloved All Out Attack chip.

Its replacement, the Free Hit, has vexed managers for a considerably longer period, with a number of theories as to its best use being touted.

The consensus was to save it for one of the inevitable late-season blank Gameweeks when sides drop out of the league schedule because of FA Cup commitments.

But even that has created confusion.

Should the Free Hit be deployed in Gameweek 31, when the FA Cup quarter-finals take place, or during the semi-final weekend of Gameweek 35?

And there’s even a school of thought that argues for the chip to be saved for the final Gameweek of the season to take advantage of plum fixtures and the teams with rather more to play for.

We asked Mark and our panel of Fantasy experts – reigning FPL champion Ben Crabtree, runner-up Uwais Ahmed and Career Hall of Fame top dogs Jay Egersdorff and Peter Kouwenberg – the latest in our series of Burning Questions: When is the optimum time to play the Free Hit chip?

Uwais Says…

When the Triple Captain and Bench Boost chips were introduced, it was fairly apparent to most within the FPL fraternity that they were to be used in conjunction with a Wildcard to take full advantage of the double Gameweeks in the latter part of the season.

Things, however, are not so obvious with the new Free Hit chip.

In pre-season, there was a lot of discussion that the FA Cup quarter-final weekend in Gameweek 31 would probably be the most opportune time to use it.

But I am of the view that if you have not yet deployed the second Wildcard, it might be an idea not to commit to the Free Hit chip then.

I took the view from quite early on that if the FA Cup draw was kind and did not pit too many Premier League clubs against one another in the early rounds, there was a great likelihood that we would see Premier League clubs going the distance in the competition.

In the last two seasons, the FA Cup has boasted an all-Premier League semi-final line-up, and I anticipate that to be the case this year, too.

If Spurs beat Rochdale at home in their fifth round replay, you just have to wonder how much value there is to use the Free Hit Chip simply to maximise returns from the four matches that currently make up Gameweek 31.

Looking at the upcoming schedules for the teams guaranteed fixtures – Liverpool, Everton, Watford, Bournemouth and even West Brom (although when you are bottom and seven points adrift, it is difficult to gauge what is a good fixture) – we have enough time from now to build a squad to ensure we have a respectable outing in that Gameweek.

We can then look to use our Wildcards soon after to take advantage of double Gameweeks as they have huge potential for explosive returns and could make the difference in our mini-leagues if prepared and executed properly.

We can then implement the Free Hit chip for Gameweek 35 – the FA Cup semi-final weekend – when there will be a bigger round of fixtures to choose from than in Gameweek 31.

These will include Arsenal at home to West Ham and Liverpool away to West Brom, and possibly even Manchester City vs Swansea City and Chelsea at home to Huddersfield.

Jay Says…

Short answer here is nobody knows!

While I think that planning is vital as we head into the final part of the season, it doesn’t make sense to me to plan for an eventuality when we don’t yet know the full facts.

Gameweeks 31 and 35 will throw up blanks, and Gameweeks 34 and 37 could throw up doubles.

But the Premier League have been known to catch out FPL managers in recent seasons with creative ways of rescheduling fixtures, the Gameweek 28 rearrangement of Arsenal v Man City being a prime example.

I remember Crystal Palace v Everton and Aston Villa v QPR fixtures being shunted into unexpected Gameweeks in recent seasons, so I can’t stress enough the importance of planning with the information that is definitely in front of you, NOT the information that could be in front of you.

FPL managers need to remember there are plenty of points to play for in Gameweeks 28-30, so taking one’s eye off the ball in the short-term planning department could be a dangerous strategy.

Peter Says…

I think anyone who tells you that a specific approach to the Free Hit chip is “clearly” the best approach is wrong.

For me, there are so many factors to consider – number of existing “blankers” in your squad, club priorities changing towards the end of the season, form, etc – that the decision whether to play the chip in Gameweek 31 or 35 really could go either way.

I’ve been going in circles playing out both scenarios and have even toyed with Wildcarding next week.

If pushed, though, my current feeling (possibly influenced by spending my Triple Captain chip so prematurely and profligately) is to cling onto that Free Hit chip like Scrooge grasping his last shilling for as long as possible.

Personally, I don’t subscribe to the school of thought which suggests that using the Free Hit in Gameweek 38 might be a masterstroke because those fixtures tend to throw up unpredictable results and rotations.

But I do favour the idea of wildcarding in Gameweek 32/33 in preparation for the double Gameweeks and using the Free Hit to deal with that (no longer quite as pesky) Gameweek 35.

Having read perfectly compelling and convincing arguments about both approaches, I decided upon my preference through the “revolutionary” approach of simply sketching out my team for the next few Gameweeks (including anticipated transfers, but ignoring the effect of injuries etc) “Sliding Doors” style.

Ultimately, I was happy to ride with an extra Stoke City/Liverpool player using free transfers until Gameweek 31 and couldn’t see a huge upside to using the Free Hit chip to flood my team. Everyone is going to have three Liverpool players regardless of their strategy, and I’m lukewarm about the other fixtures.

My prevailing feeling is that I’m not prepared to sacrifice the chip in Gameweek 31 just to crowbar in another two or three of the less fashionable players from unpredictable teams.

Retaining a bit more flexibility for the dying embers of the season – when we know who will be fighting, rather than holidaying, on the beaches – tempts me more than the lottery of which third Stoke or Bournemouth player could strike it lucky in Gameweek 31.

Ben Says…

In terms of setting up a much-needed strong finish to the season, I’d prefer to play the Free Hit in Gameweek 35.

This is based solely on being able to Wildcard in Gameweek 33, which would set me up for the remaining matches while ignoring the headache of factoring in who doesn’t play in Gameweek 35.

However, assuming Spurs beat Rochdale so their fixture with Newcastle vanishes from the Gameweek 31 schedule, I currently have just four players playing that week, with Jonjoe Kenny and Oumar Niasse making up half of them.

I have time to beef up this number with transfers, or can play the Free Hit, but the lack of appealing fixtures in Gameweek 31 make it a tough call.

I can either gradually bring in average players over the next few weeks to the incremental detriment of my team, or play my Free Hit to create the worst squad I’ll have ever owned in what could be a really low-scoring week.

The difference between fielding 11 and six players might amount to just 10-15 points, whereas using the Free Hit in Gameweek 35 means I can set a Wildcard team to take full advantage of the double Gameweeks 34 and 37.

There will also be more – and better – teams playing in Gameweek 35.

I didn’t know my answer when I started writing, but holding onto the Free Hit for Gameweek 35 is now my decision.

All of my next transfers won’t be aimed at Gameweek 31 as I want some Arsenal players after their Man City fixture, but I’ll add a few in and accept a low score in what is likely to be an underwhelming week.

Mark Says…

While it’s always wise to leave options open, the onset of Gameweek 31 means that we have to arrive at some kind of decision on our strategy in order to plan our four or five transfers between now and then.

I currently own six active Gameweek 31 players, though two of those names – Jonjoe Kenny and Collin Quaner – stretch the definition of “active”.

Still, with five free transfers remaining, I’m set on going into Gameweek 31 with seven or eight key assets, maybe more if a name emerges that warrants a points hit.

That is one very strong argument to keeping the Free Hit back for Gameweek 35.

The potential of the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34 is the other.

We’re not certain on what Gameweek 34 will present us just yet, rotation risks could actually limit the effectiveness of this chip quite considerably.

But then by saving the Free Hit for Gameweek 35, I would give myself maximum flexibility to exploit the double Gameweek that will surely arrive the week before.

No matter how many teams we get playing twice in Gameweek 34, knowing that I have the Free Hit to play immediately after to salve the damage inflicted by the blanks, offers me total freedom.

Hopefully, that can translate to an effective Bench Boost, and it will be the points from that, rather than my Free Hit tally, which could be the pay-off that really counts.

Conveniently, we will know the FA Cup semi-final line-up and therefore the full Gameweek 35 picture immediately after Gameweek 31. That should reveal the potential make-up of the Gameweek 37 doubles.

Having all our chips available with that information will likely be significant.

654 Comments Post a Comment
  1. villian-ty
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Which option

    A. Alonso, Lingard -> Walcott, VVD
    B. Otamendi, Hazard -> VVD, Erikssen
    C. Alonso, Jones -> Daniels, VVD

    Pickford Speroni
    Otamendi Alonso Ogbonna Jones Fernandez
    Hazard Lingard Salah Sterling Allen
    Kane Firmino Quarner

    2 FT 0ITB

    1. Snooze ya lose
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      C

    2. Nesvy
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      B

    3. Patrick Bateman
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A IMO. Lingard should be your main priority is getting rid

  2. Prison Mike
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Do we think Son will start this weekend or will Lamela replace him?

    1. Snooze ya lose
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Son will play

  3. Baked baines
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    A lot are saying 4 games in GW 31. But it's 5 with Spurs v Newcastle

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Only if Spurs lose to Rochdale

    2. Bruno Bruno!!
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Its 4 for now, only if spurs loose to Rochdale will there be 5 fixtures

      1. George James
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Its 5 unless Spurs Lose.

  4. Snooze ya lose
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Should I play Alonso and jones or naughton and lascelles?

    1. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Jones won't play

  5. SpaceCadet
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Kun Otamendi > vvd firmino for free?

  6. SpeedyJD
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    My situation is I no longer have the second wild card available. Should I be playing my FH chip in GW31? And planning ahead to GW34 & 35 with the likes of Arsenal and now Man City players? Although those with the FH chip in GW35 will have more choice with careful planning I could nearly have a full eleven anyway by then. Thanks

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I'd probably still build for GW31 with free transfers, build for GW34 with transfers up to then (signing players who also will have the DGW37), then FH in GW35, then build for GW37.

      Much depends on how many GW31 assets you have now. The general concensus is that - to beat a line-up with 7-8 players - you'll need to be spot on with the FH in GW31 and that looks difficult to achieve given the calibre of the differentials on offer.

      Some will pull it off if there are 2-3 players who hit double-figures outside of Liverpool. That still seems a big "if" though.

      1. SpeedyJD
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Thanks Mark. Is it not a worry though that I could be losing points from the likes of Spurs and Leicester players in the next three game weeks by trying to get 6-8 GW31 players. Without the wildcard I've then got to try and get rid of them by GW34 and GW35 other than Liverpool players. I can get Arsenal and some Burnley players now as they have good fixtures and a double GW34, probably Man City too now their out of the cup and wait for the results from GW31. I'll then have three weeks to sort the remaining players from the teams knocked out of the cup for GW34 & 35. As Andy points out in the Scoutcast I can just take a - 2 hit (or two) in GW35 as there will be more choice of players.
        Basically I've snookered myself with using the wild card early. Thank you.

  7. Darthshearer
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    GTG?

    Jones -> van Dijk
    BSilva -> Stanislas
    Hazard -> Eriksen

    Got 2.8 ITB

    DDG
    van Dijk | Lascelles | Laporte
    Salah (c) | Sterling | Eriksen | Stanislas
    Vardy | Kane | Niasse

    Elliot | Ogbonna | Kenny | Milliovejevic

  8. Bruno Bruno!!
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    VanDijk to Gomez, a sideways move?

    Gomez rotated with TAA, which is my concern for GW31

    1. Bruno Bruno!!
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Sorry Gomez to VVD*

      1. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Ah, in that case then it makes sense. I think VvD is the profile of a player who could deliver double-figures in GW31.

        1. Bruno Bruno!!
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Cheers Mark, what are your thoughts on Son thinking of upgrading him to either Eriksen or Mahrez

    2. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      And also Clyne could feature before the season is out.

      I'd keep VvD.

    3. We ain't got no histor…
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Why ain't we considering Robertson. Isn't he nailed to play?

      1. Shineonme
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        no he's not nailed vvd is

  9. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Jones or Otamendi to VVD?

    If Jones confirmed out easily him but if it is unclear would you move him out anyway and play Otamendi hoping he does not get rested ( with either Kenny or Ogbonna on bench)?

    1. QuintonFortune25
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      My problem exactly. Edging toward Otamendi because I fancy Jones to return for the Palace game and get a CS.

    2. Dybala10
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Maybe comes down to if you would make money on either?

      I'm in the same boat but Jones' looks set to drop first so will ship him.

      Both are dispensable.

    3. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      jones because he's not playing sun

      1. dunas_dog
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Has he been ruled out for Sunday?

  10. Nolberto Solano
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Azpi -> VVD confirmed. Which option for 2nd FT?

    A) Choupo -> Mahrez
    B) RLC -> Shaqiri

    1. QuintonFortune25
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A, I would do B just before GW31

    2. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      B

  11. Emiliano Sala
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    It has an easy answer. Gw 31
    Your are making this too complicated for yoursleves and want to be different to somehow and play it at another gw

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I don't think not playing it in GW31 is being different now though.

      GW31 could still be very effective if you're short on active players now and certainly if you don't have BB remaining.

      But I have 5-6 GW31 players so I'm not sure I can Free Hit to beat the line-up I can achieve by GW31 with transfers alone. I'd have to be spot on with the 3-4 differentials.

      1. Emiliano Sala
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I want playera who have great fixtures coming, like leicester, spurs and arsenal
        Keeping players for 3-4 weeks to bring 2 points in gw31 is not reasonable.
        I had 5-6 players for gw31, but I decided to sell some of them
        Look, arnie for example plays as CF. He is much better option than shaqiri with that tough fixtures coming.
        Leicester's fixtures and mahrez hunger to score
        These teams have both great fixtures before and after gw31
        You can FH gw 31 and gain lots of points with differentials like benteke and zaha and coleman that nobody own

  12. Bruno Bruno!!
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Son to Mahrez ?

    1. QuintonFortune25
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yeah good transfer

  13. V-2 Schneiderlin
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    for the next 5 weeks would you prefer:

    A. Mane
    B. Eriksen

    (I already have Salah and Firm but no Spurs)

    1. QuintonFortune25
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      B, going to be a few big scores from Erikson imo.

      1. V-2 Schneiderlin
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        yup - I'm hoping Eriksen would cover the fact I don't have Kane (am going to keep Aguero instead)

    2. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Depends where Eriksen ends up playing. If Spurs go to 3 at the back Eriksen could end up in CM with Alli and Son/Moura/lamela behind Kane.

      I have been looking at him to but want to wait and see what way Poch goes for the run in now that Toby is back fit.

      1. V-2 Schneiderlin
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        good point thanks - I'll consider this

    3. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Eriksen

  14. QuintonFortune25
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Planning on doing either:
    A) Otamendi, Alonso & Lingard ➡️ VVD, Bauer & Erikson

    B) Jones, Alonso & Lingard ➡️ Robertson, Bauer & Erikson

    Even if Jones does miss this gameweek I'm able to cover with VVD, Bauer and Mee as a back three. Which is the best option between now and GW32?

    1. V-2 Schneiderlin
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      probably A for me

  15. Cruz88
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Very useful article guys, I've not had much time to go over all the BGW and DGW stuff but this makes things clearer. For the first season in a while I've retained all my chips at this stage (usually have wildcarded by now) so will also be looking to retain the FH chip for BGW 35, use the wildcard before the double gameweeks and then just deal with only have potentially 5-7 players for GW31.

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yep, I'm looking forward to seeing how FH teams do though. Really fascinating to see if some can pull off big differentials.

      1. Cruz88
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        The (possibly) good thing is the other people in my minileague (and I presume many others) don't read into this stuff like I do, so at the first sign of a blank GW will unleash the free hit, leaving me as one of the few with it still active for GW35. Hopefully the patient, long term strategy then pays off and GW31 is as low scoring as predicted.

  16. willl
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Posted on old article by accident.

    Have Salah and VVD already.

    Looking at my plans for the coming weeks and thinking a second Pool defensive asset is the best idea. Karius is 4.8m and would give me a playing keeper in 31 and 35 whilst being able to bench him for 34, rather than getting in Mane or Firmino and playing them in 34.

    This would allow me to get Mahrez/Vardy instead of Mane/Firmino.

    Or am I complicating it too much?

    1. willl
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      note I am planning GW36 WC and 37 BB as I have used other chips.

    2. Atwood
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Wouldn't bother getting two Liverpool defenders

  17. Atwood
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Any advice gents?
    1FT, 2.5 in the bank. Thinking Jones > VVD.

    Pickford
    Dunk - Otamendi - Mee
    Salah - Walcott - Sterling - Shaqiri
    Kane - Firmino - Wilson

    Elliot - Jones - Lingard - Ogbonna

    1. Emiliano Sala
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Do it

      1. Atwood
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Now I think about it I could actually keep Jones and bring VVD in for any other of my defenders

        1. Emiliano Sala
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Jones was a good pick someday
          Now now
          Bailly is coming back and they have 4 ready CBs

          1. Emiliano Sala
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Not now*

    2. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Jones for VVD

  18. Z3US
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Hi

    Martial + Azpi --> Mahrez + Robertson

    Allows me Shaq -> Mkhi next week

    Been thinking this for over a week, but still struggling to pull trigger with Robbo rotation worries... worth gamble?

    Team as stands:

    Ryan
    Azpi - Alonso - Ota
    Sterling - Salah (c) - Shaq - Martial
    Kane - Firm - Ayew

    Elliot -- Og - Jones - Surman

    Thanks

    1. Shineonme
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Martial is a waste

  19. Atwood
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Also - very helpful article

  20. The_FF_King
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Imagine if Chelsea didn't sell their best/promising players. Their team could be:

    Court
    Azp, Luiz, Cahil
    Moses, Matic, Kante, Alonso
    Hazard, Salah, De Bruyne

    I know that Salah and De Bruyne didn't look as special as they are now when they first joined Chelsea but still, that attack would be crazy.

    You could also drop De Bruyne deeper and stick Costa up front.

    1. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      No place for Zola?

    2. dark91
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      That team would be very defensive. Also Salah won't give enough in such position

  21. Jay_
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Vital part of the season. Load up on 31 now? Ignore 31'ers and get in players that blank 31 but good fixtures now? Choosing weeks to unleash the chips, if you have any. Join this league, scoring starts this week, will be very interested to see who comes out on top. Over 100 joined so far, hope to get that much higher.

      The home stretch league, all welcome.
      Code to join: 309-1268274

      Good luck all 🙂

      1. Basil1977
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Just joined, i'm having a rubbish season, hoping for a bit of luck to finish this season with.
        Starting this week on a -4 doing a bit of both for gw31 by bringing in Mahrez for the fixtures and VVD for the blank.

    • mr messi
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Otamendi or Alonso out for VVD?

      1. Karan14
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        If you need the money Alonso otherwise Otamendi.

      2. Shineonme
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Otamendi

    • IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A) son to mane. Keep kun
      B) kun to firmino. Keep son
      C) son to mahrez and kun to firmino
      D) son to erik and kun to firmino
      Have 2 fts and money not a problem
      Replies and reasons plsss

    • Ëð
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A lot of people talking about using BB in GW34 if using a FH in 35. Is anyone considering saving the BB until GW37 and even using TC in GW34?

    • ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      How are these moves for a -4?

      Otamendi, Sanchez and Choupo-Moting ~> VVD, Mahrez and Mane/Eriksen

      Gives me.......

      Hennessey
      Alonso / VVD / Dawson
      Salah / Eriksen / Sterling / Walcott
      Kane / Firmino / Wilson

      Speroni / Choupo-Moting / Kenny / Ogbonna

      £0.1itb

      I may get Foster in for another hit if Hennessey is ruled out.

      1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Gives me.......

        Hennessey
        Alonso / VVD / Kenny
        Salah / Eriksen / Sterling / Walcott / Mahrez
        Kane / Wilson

        Speroni / Depoitre / Kenny / Ogbonna

        £0.1itb

        1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Kane can turn into Firmino for GW31 and WC back in for GW32.

      2. DJ1000
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Looks a great team to me. Have enough potential gw31 players to add to and a great all round team. Not much gw31 dross

    • Dybala10
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Thanks for the article. Been some good stuff on here regarding this recently.

      First time ever I haven't used my WC by now and grateful (despite plummeting in the ranks).

    • THFC4LIFE
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      What would you do with this bunch? Save?

      Ryan
      VVD Jones Maguire
      Sterling Salah Mkhi Walcott Ibe
      Kane Kun

      Adrian Ayew Francis Bardsley

      1ft 0.2itb (no wildcard no freehit available)

      1. DJ1000
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        DEfo save

    • mgrea
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      VvD or Mane as 3rd Pool player?

      1. Atwood
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I'd have Mane if I could afford him without major reshuffling.

        1. mgrea
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Cheers. Could downgrade Haz to him. Just concerned for rotation.

      2. Feed tha Sheep
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Mane

      3. Shineonme
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        vvd

    • Ibralicious
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      What is the argument for VvD over Robertson? Robertson seems much better value atm.

      1. DGW blindness is for Kinnea…
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        More expensive = better.
        General rule in life for sheep.

      2. QuintonFortune25
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        More nailed and goal threat

      3. Junior ⚽
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Goal threat

      4. tisza
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        perceived goal threat (which his history shows is debatable)
        perceived "nailedness" - probably the same as Robertson's given options available.

        1. Feed tha Sheep
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Agree

      5. Z3US
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        This. Am torn as could def use extra $$ from Robbo

      6. Feed tha Sheep
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Don’t understand it myself Robertson more attacking and cheaper so a better option for me

        1. Shineonme
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          rotation risk

      7. #FPLBhuna
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Don't think that's the case, I believe many feel VVD is less drop-able.

        If prices were reversed, still feel the majority would go VVD.

        I've gone Robertson myself.

    • Gaffers
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Intending to play;

      Foster
      VVD - Smalling - Long
      Sterling - Mahrez - Salah - Martial - Walcott
      Firmino - Aguero

      (Adrian, Jones, Yedlin, Quaner)

      I have 0 FT, but concerned about Martial a) starting b) getting any returns

      Do you think it's worth a -4 to move him out this week?