970 Comments Post a Comment
  1. giroudsgirlfriend
    • 3 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Onana
    Chilwell-GABRIEL-Estu
    Rashford-Mbeumo-Saka-Odegaard
    Wissa-Haaland-WATKINS

    Bench: Turner, EZE, Botman, Baldock

    Have 0.0M in bank; But 2FT
    Extremely tempted to do:

    Eze, Watkins, Gabriel —> March, Isak and Gvardiol which I just can afford. Waiting for one more week to Get them Will make me not being possible to Get them.

    Should I pull the trigger?

    1. Tcheco
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Lose Watkins at your peril.

    2. We Go Again
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I would wait till GW5 to get Isak when their fixtures turn. Not sure there is a point to do the move this early and for a hit.

      You could just get someone like Rico Henry in for Gab and roll the other FT

    3. MBK 42
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Crazy to sell Watkins this week

    4. Kevin and Perry go
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Girls allowed.

  2. -GK22-
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Already raged my changes would you

    A) take shaw out for -8
    B) wildcard
    C) leave the damage alone

    Pickford
    Gabriel, Estupinan, Chilwell
    Rashford, Saka, Martinelli, Mbuemo, Jota
    Haaland, Alvarez

    Turner, Shaw* Baldock* Archer

    1. g40steve
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      If Gabriel is benched again probably a defender down?

      1. MBK 42
        • 9 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Yeah I think with that uncertainty I’d take the extra hit and get a City defender.

    2. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Roll with it

    3. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      If you wildcard what would you do with Rashford?

    4. We Go Again
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      C and pray

    5. Tcheco
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Leave it alone. Hopefully Gab starts

    6. Bod
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      What were the changes you already made?

      I’d be reluctant to take a a further hit, there’s only a chance of an upside from it and it’s a smaller upside that the 4pts you risk

    7. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Shaw out costs only 4 pts. Do it and you can break even immediately. Gabriel has to go also soon and your problems might start to cumulate unless you do it.

    8. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      One way to look at a hit this week is an 'extra' transfer next week.

    9. bso
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 7 days ago

      Your team is fine snd Gabriel will start. Leave as is.

  3. MBK 42
    • 9 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Guardian rumours mentioned that Chelsea are in for Balogun (4.5m fwd) from Arsenal - could be a great option if he does move and can nail a starting spot.

    1. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Probably get injured too

      1. Hazz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        He already is injured...

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Apparently Spurs enquired last week so Arsenal quoted them even more.

    3. putana
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      he's going to Monaco

  4. HuttonDressedasLahm
    • 14 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Another 50/50 decision failed
    Shaw v AWB
    Gabriel v Shaw
    Eze v Mitoma

    Chasing my arse now

    1. Tcheco
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      The only failure I see is actually considering AWB regardless of his assist in the first game. Don't beat yourself up about it mate

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Look on the bright side

      You started with Mbeumo,. Chilwell etc

      1. HuttonDressedasLahm
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Errr, no
        Wissa over Mbeumo

  5. Scout15
    • 6 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Shaw replacement?
    A) Gusto
    B) Romero

    1. Lord Flashheart
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      gvardiol?

      1. Scout15
        • 6 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Already own Walker, Foden and Haaland...

    2. Zaruto
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Porro could be good option

  6. _Freddo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Strong 15 man squads are the way to go, out of the blue injuries are really testing people, there's no excuse not to if you only have Haaland.

    1. MBK 42
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Agree, starting to think of wildcard to change my Salah team to more of a rounded squad

      1. KingZamalek
        • 9 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Did that as soon as Salah missed the penalty and scored a measly 5 points. Current WC squad:

        Onana - Turner/Areola
        Chilwell - Estu - Saliba - Henry - Udogie/Gvardiol
        Rashford - Saka - Mbeumo - Mitoma - Foden/Sterling
        Haaland - Jackson - Wissa

        The 3 slashes I'm still to decide on. Either way I'll have plenty of money ITB.

    2. g40steve
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Yes, got told too many benching problems with squad, not bad option so far.

    3. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I agree

      Many pre-season said a bench wasn't required!

      1. Baps hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        They always do and fail pretty often 😉

    4. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      14 players is basically enough imo

    5. Get up ya bum
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Yup. This me

      Ramsdale Areola
      Trent Estupinan Udogie Gusto Digne
      Mitoma Saka Odegaard Bowen Eze
      Haaland Wissa Watkins

      147 points so far

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Playing bench boost this week

        1. AC/DC AFC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          You could catch the gw1 BB crew

          1. Get up ya bum
            • 14 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Was that a thing? Time to reel them fookers in then ay

            1. AC/DC AFC
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 8 Years
              9 months, 8 days ago

              Yep

              Worked for a few.

              Loads wildcarding in gw3 because of a poor gw2 score.

              But if Haaland had hit another 24 captain points most were be fairly chuffed still.

              1. Get up ya bum
                • 14 Years
                9 months, 8 days ago

                Yeah always a lot of points chasing early season. I enjoy watching the carnage haha.

  7. wormface
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Hey, if I’ve taken a minus 4 already but if I now play my wildcard will that minus 4 still count ?

    1. We Go Again
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No

    2. MBK 42
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No will be cancelled

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No

    4. Tonyawesome69
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      11 years and you are asking this question?!

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        People forget.

        They only have 2.wildcards.a season.

        Especially if they give up by boxing day.

    5. bobbyg
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No

    6. wormface
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I know . Had a brain fart . Just couldn’t remember. Thanks for the reply’s

  8. trixz
    • 2 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    really don't want to bring in Chilwell or anyone from Chelsea, am i just stupid?

    1. Øgaard it's Haa…
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Nope. I almost wish I did'nt have Chilwell now, so downbeat am I as a Chelsea supporter.

      1. Øgaard it's Haa…
        • 1 Year
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I think I'd have either Sanchez or Colwill, only, if I were looking to add Chelsea players. If Caicedo locks in as I expect he will in a couple of games, I think Enzo could be good value.

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Only you can answer that.

      😉

    3. I Must Break You
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      If I were drafting defenders right now, Chilwell, Estupinan, and Saliba would be my first picks, by some distance. He's a monster in that left wing back spot. Practically sets up shop in the opposing team's 18. Like Alonso of old.

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Estupinan has end product too

        1. I Must Break You
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Of course. That's why I included him above, obviously

          1. AC/DC AFC
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 8 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Indeed

            I was agreeing with you!

  9. The Royal Robin
    • 8 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    If you were wildcarding ...

    A) Colwill & Diaz
    B) Udogie & Sterling

    1. KingZamalek
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Def B

    2. Stranger Mings
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      A

  10. Steve The Spud
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Chance of baldock being for this weekend?

    Asking for a friend

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Just being

      100% nailed on

      1. Øgaard it's Haa…
        • 1 Year
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Haha! I hope he staggers to the weekend, at least. 🙂

      2. V-2 Schneiderlin
        • 13 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        sadly none of us are 100% nailed on..... kinda makes you think..,.!

  11. Scratch
    • 14 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Wildcard 95% settled

    Ederson (Areola)
    Estupinan, Saliba, Chilwell
    Saka, Foden, Sterling, Mbeumo, Mitoma
    Haaland, Jackson

    Isak / Udogie / Botman £1.1m itb

    Slight bench headache for a couple of gameweeks, then I sell some Chelsea once their fixtures dry up

    1. The 12th Man
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Love it.

    2. Kodap
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      What made you want to WC early? I’m really tempted by it but unsure whether it’s the right move

      1. Scratch
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I wildcarded because I wanted Mbeumo, Chilwell and Sterling as well as cleaning up a couple of dud picks and to do so I had to sell Salah which freed up loads of cash.
        I've had a decent start (around 387k) and basically i don't think the first WC holds that much value, I think it's either a good momentum pusher or a get out of jail free card if you're very unlucky with injuries.

        1. AC/DC AFC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          But tbf with a rank of 387k you need neither at this point.

          Many on here claim Sterling is a dud too.

          1. Øgaard it's Haa…
            • 1 Year
            9 months, 8 days ago

            You can lead a horse to water..............:)

          2. Scratch
            • 14 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Sterling was unreal at the weekend, pretty unlucky with his injuries last season and I'm also a fan of Poch, so a 3 week Chelsea triple-up with those fixtures is a fun gamble

        2. Øgaard it's Haa…
          • 1 Year
          9 months, 8 days ago

          What was your pre-WC team? Must have been ok if you rank around 387k. Good for momentum yes, but before the IB and end of TW could be troublesome.

    3. MBK 42
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      V similar to what I’m thinking though I have Watkins who I will play this week then can move to Isak and L Diaz instead of Sterling

    4. FPL Blow-In
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Looks good. Having both Sterling and Jackson is really playing the fixtures and could pay off. Too much for me though.

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        This makes no sense. Pick each player on their own merits. "Coverage" is total nonsense for attacking players

        1. FPL Blow-In
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          It makes perfect sense, I never mentioned coverage. I’m judging on their individual merit! Doubling up on attack from a team that has two goals so far and neither of the players being picked has had a return? What doesn’t make sense about it?

          1. Øgaard it's Haa…
            • 1 Year
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Agree. I replied below too late.

          2. Get up ya bum
            • 14 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Not picking a player because you have another player from the same team doesn't make sense. It's the same faulty reasoning as coverage. One, two or three from one teams attack makes no difference. All that matters is if you predict they will outscore other players at their price points or not.

            1. FPL Blow-In
              • 11 Years
              9 months, 8 days ago

              Two things here, firstly suggesting doubling up on attack that is struggling to score goals. “One, two or three from an attack makes no difference”, agreed! From an attack that is scoring plenty of goals. Why do you think people with both Rashford and Bruno are selling? Both have potential to score well at their price point. I’m not sure why this is confusing? Secondly, I don’t think either are the better choices at their price points.

              1. FPL Blow-In
                • 11 Years
                9 months, 8 days ago

                Watch Sterling and Jackson double digit hauls now 😉

              2. Get up ya bum
                • 14 Years
                9 months, 8 days ago

                If people are selling one of rashford or Bruno because they play in the same attack the they are confused. Same as with sterling and Jackson judge them on their individual merits. They are either worth having or not. The fact you have someone's teammate in your fpl team doesn't effect how many goals and assists he'll get.

                1. FPL Blow-In
                  • 11 Years
                  9 months, 8 days ago

                  😆 I’m not saying it effects it…

                  1. Get up ya bum
                    • 14 Years
                    9 months, 8 days ago

                    Right so you see then that if you think Bruno and rashford are good picks then there is absolutely no reason to not have both. The feeling of spreading the risk is an illusion. Yes some weeks neither will score which is the case for any two players same team or not.

                    1. FPL Blow-In
                      • 11 Years
                      9 months, 8 days ago

                      I agree with what you’re saying, I think they are good picks however I think Utd ans an team are in a bad patch. I do think there are other factors to be considered is all I’m saying. For example, Brighton are averaging 4 goals per game so far with goals and assist spread across each of their attackers. Having two from Brighton attack looks promising if they continue on current form based on the evidence we have so far. Chelsea on the other hand are averaging 1 goal a game involving none of these two attackers, neither of whom are on set pieces, neither of whom have an attacking return, they have 0 wins, doubling on this attack is something I’d consider too risky at present is what I was trying to say in my OP (and I think there are better options from other teams)

                      All in all I agree with you

                      1. FPL Blow-In
                        • 11 Years
                        9 months, 8 days ago

                        Thanks for the discussion, I’m hitting the head now. Good luck this gw

                      2. Get up ya bum
                        • 14 Years
                        9 months, 8 days ago

                        Yeah cheers mate, good luck to you too!

          3. FPL Blow-In
            • 11 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Even if a team was struggling to score like Chelsea are currently but everything went through one of these players as the main focal point you’d consider them more but that is not the case. The defenders are scoring more than the attackers.

        2. Øgaard it's Haa…
          • 1 Year
          9 months, 8 days ago

          I see what you're saying, as in they can both easily score in the same game because they're attackers, but I can equally see what blow-in is saying, that neither, on their own merits, is worth having above many more form players for their price. If you think Chelsea batter Luton then ok I suppose to pick the most likely scorers.

          1. Get up ya bum
            • 14 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Whether they are the best picks at that price point is a different question. I have neither and aren't in a hurry to change that because I think they aren't the best options around that price. I read blow in as saying one or the other is good but both is "too much" that's what makes no sense.

          2. FPL Blow-In
            • 11 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Yep. Listen, fixtures can breed form and I do think Sterling looked much like his former self last game but Chelsea as a whole have not been great and the likes of Wissa, Alvarez and Watkins would all be ahead of Jackson for me. I do expect Chelsea to win comfortably but I see them struggling against Bournemouth and Villa.

            1. Get up ya bum
              • 14 Years
              9 months, 8 days ago

              Agree with ya there. Wissa, Alvarez, Watkins, isak look better picks than Jackson. Diaz, Foden, Bowen, Mitoma, March, Eze, Diaby etc over Sterling

              1. FPL Blow-In
                • 11 Years
                9 months, 8 days ago

                Yes exactly. Maybe it was just how I worded the OP

                1. Get up ya bum
                  • 14 Years
                  9 months, 8 days ago

                  Yeah the perils of text communication I guess. I just see a lot of wanting "coverage" or not wanting to "double up" when it's just an illusion and shouldn't ever factor into predicting points.

                  With defenders and gk those concepts are valid because they earn clean sheets collectively

                  1. Øgaard it's Haa…
                    • 1 Year
                    9 months, 8 days ago

                    This is a valid and good point. However, while it's possible 2 attackers in the same team may do well, there may be 2 attackers in another team that do better.

                    1. Earwicker
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 7 Years
                      9 months, 8 days ago

                      This is why few went with both Suarez and Sturbridge at the start of their amazing season. There are many roads to FPL points and double forwards seems the least likely.

                      1. Earwicker
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 7 Years
                        9 months, 8 days ago

                        Sturridge

                  2. McGurn
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 14 Years
                    9 months, 8 days ago

                    I have always been baffled when people don’t want to double up on attack. I get it for defence, but if the attack has great potential, picking both makes perfect sense. Picking just one, you may get the wrong one!

                    1. FPL Blow-In
                      • 11 Years
                      9 months, 7 days ago

                      I have doubled on attacks, double city and Arsenal currently.

    5. Get up ya bum
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Very nice

    6. Tcheco
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Sterling + Jackson is overkill. I would upgrade Jackson to Watkins.

    7. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I don't like that team tbh. Especially not Udogie and Jackson.

      1. Øgaard it's Haa…
        • 1 Year
        9 months, 8 days ago

        How can you not like Udogie?! You know, you being a dogie'n'all? FTW!

      2. Scratch
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Judging by first few games Jackson is veering towards Origi / Darwin meme striker territory alright, it's a 3 week punt with Luton, should be fun if nothing else

    8. KingZamalek
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Botman boring. Henry better.

      1. Øgaard it's Haa…
        • 1 Year
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Botman will not be boring in a couple of GWs time.

    9. Øgaard it's Haa…
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Oh no, a Chelsea fixture chaser. You have my sympathies.

  12. fpl_tp95
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Johnston
    Udogie chilwell, estu
    Saka, martinelli, rash, Bruno, Eze
    Haaland Watkins

    Turner, Gabriel, kabore, mubama

    2ft and Scared or not having Mbeumo but I see palace Brentford being a tight game and feel Eze good as easily get a pen or an assist as Mbeumo. Should I make the move?

    Considering doing Watkins to Jackson and saving the second transfer. Thoughts?

    Or

    1. MBK 42
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I wouldn’t lose Watkins, on form and decent fixture this week - I would do Bruno to Foden

    2. JammySprat
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      You can't go from Eze to Mbeumo this early, fair enough to hop off Eze but not to Mbeumo as they are very similar. One has got lucky with 2 pens and tap in, the other has looked just as good and could have gotten a pen against Arsenal that would have been similar to Reamgate. I'd be shipping Bruno or Rash for Foden, City attack looking way better than United.

  13. The 12th Man
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Would you WC this?
    Pickford
    Chilwell,Estupinian,Udogie
    Rashford,Saka,Martinelli,Foden,Maddison*
    Haaland,Pedro

    Turner,Shaw*,Baldock*,Archer.

    No FT’s 2.3m itb.

    1. Kodap
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Probably now the Shaw news has come out, just my opinion.

      1. The 12th Man
        • 10 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        It’s either WC or a -4 to move Shaw or Maddison but feels like I’m chasing with problems to fix.
        KDB > Maddison last week has killed me plus Gabriel.

        1. Kodap
          • 6 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Yep, I feel you. Similar issues here, Gabriel, Stones, Maddison.. nightmare start & thinking of a WC too!

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No

      Just sort out Shaw and maybe Maddison...

      Pickford, Pedro, Rashford, Baldock and Saka and you'll be just fine!

    3. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Shaw to Dias/Gvardiol and perhaps Maddison to Mbeumo snd you are fine.

      1. The 12th Man
        • 10 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Both for -8?

    4. FPL Blow-In
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I think a hit or two and save your WC. Maddison should be back after this gw or you could move to Mbuemo for -4. You could bench Maddison and do Archer to Wissa or sell Shaw

      1. FPL Blow-In
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I think Archer to Wissa and the benching headache is probably a blessing with all these injuries happening! Shaw to City def next gw

        1. The 12th Man
          • 10 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          This has crossed my mind too.
          Limping to at least next week during the Internationals might be the prudent move.

    5. No Professionals
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      I wouldn’t. I’d take a hit to do Maddison to Mbeumo.

    6. JammySprat
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Shaw to Diaz and your chilling

      1. JammySprat
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Dias

    7. I Must Break You
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No. Only fires are Shaw and Maddison, And the fact that Pickford sucks, possibly

    8. Øgaard it's Haa…
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 8 days ago

      No. I'd transfer Shaw and bench Madisson, who should be back soon. WC GW5 if possible.

    9. g40steve
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Mbeumo?

      The ever hopefull supporter & Pickfords not helping?

  14. Kodap
    • 6 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    If I was WC’ing, this is what I’d go with.. any changes? 2.2m in the bank.

    Ederson
    Saliba - Estup - Chilwell
    Foden - Diaz - Mbeumo - Odegaard - Mitoma
    Haaland - Jackson

    Areola - Joao Pedro - Udogie - Botman

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Just do it.

      You'll clearly feel better for it.

    2. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Udogiebyk MCI def?

      1. Baps hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        byk = to 🙁

    3. The 12th Man
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      That’s a great team. Don’t know if I’d have Pedro and Mitoma with their fixtures turning,

    4. The 12th Man
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Do you want aVilla player?

    5. The Count of Monte Cristo
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Very good!

  15. boroie
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 8 days ago

    Thoughts?

    Salah & Chukwuemeka
    ->
    Foden & Sterling

    … for free?

    1. No Professionals
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Sterling is a horrible pick imo

      1. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Why?

    2. Baps hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Supposing you have Mbeumo, yes.

      1. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I don’t… but I think his time has already come and gone. May be wrong (probably am) but I think he has lucked out in his first two games and don’t think it will continue.

        1. Harold99
            9 months, 8 days ago

            He has gotten a bit lucky but betting against Brentford getting penalties seems like suicide

    3. GeneralBanter
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Is it worth doing the Watkins to Jackson transfer tonight to save an extra 0.1 over having extra information tomorrow regarding my other players via press conferences or leaks?

      I don't need the extra 0.1 to do the transfer or for any of my forthcoming plans but at the same time how likely is it that we'll get leaks for Saturday considering that it's a Friday deadline?

      I still have 9 first-team players who I can get info on from tomorrow's press conferences, but I also have 2 FTs in case someone is out.

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        It's more about bad news on the injury front.

        Generally speaking it's better to hold unless priced out.

      2. The Count of Monte Cristo
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Would hold

      3. I Must Break You
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        You're going to sell the guy who just had a mid-week hat trick for a guy who hasn't scored yet in the premier league?

        1. AC/DC AFC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          There is this.

          But the Twitter template is convinced.

          1. I Must Break You
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 5 Years
            9 months, 7 days ago

            I started paying attention to the Twitter template last season and had by far my worst season ever

            1. tokara
              • 9 Years
              9 months, 7 days ago

              Don't trust the self proclaimed "experts"

    4. boroie
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Best two from this lot…

      A - Son
      B - Richarlison
      C - Sterling (have Jackson)
      D - Foden
      E - Bruno (have Rashford)
      F - Martinelli (have Saka)
      G - Odegaard (have Saka)
      H - Diaz

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        D, G, H
        F will come through too

        1. boroie
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Thanks… I think it’ll be Foden + 1 other.

          Originally was on Martinelli but worried about rotation.

          Not a massive fan on Odegaard. Even with pens, I never like having a midfielder who plays as deep as he does.

          I like Diaz but don’t like Liverpool’s fixtures so I am thinking of Sterling now to take advantage of Chelsea’s easy run and then switching to Diaz once Liverpool’s fixtures ease.

          1. AC/DC AFC
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 8 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Ødegaard is almost as far advanced as Saka.

            On both the eye test and heatmaps.

            1. tokara
              • 9 Years
              9 months, 7 days ago

              Shhhh

    5. cruzex
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Sterling is a horrible pick ?

      1. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        According to some on here… but he could be a huge differential.

        If I didn’t have Jackson I would 100% be on him.

        But owning Jackson too I am very 50:50.

        1. Get up ya bum
          • 14 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Having Jackson in your fpl team will have zero effect on how many goals and assists sterling gets 😉

    6. The Count of Monte Cristo
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Bottomed. 1FT + 0.9m -- but tempted to save FT?

      Players I want (Foden, Jackson, Alvarez) might have to wait until next GW?

      Pickford
      Chilwell -- Estupinán -- Henry
      Salah -- Rashford -- Saka -- Mitoma -- Mbeumo
      Haaland - J.Pedro

      Turner -- Mings* -- Baldock -- Mubama [1FT + 0.9m ITB]

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Why hold on to Mings?

        1. The Count of Monte Cristo
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Not sure whether I want to downgrade to Gusto for extra funds to attempt to get one of the 3 players I mentioned above, or if I just want to get a mid-term pick like Botman.

          1. AC/DC AFC
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 8 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Yeah,. it's tricky.

            The transfer i want to do can be derailed so sometimes holding the guy on the bench is not a bad option.

    7. Will
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Would you ditch Trent or Shaw this week (for Man City defender)?

      Shaw is definitely out…but Trent falls tonight.

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Shaw

      2. The Count of Monte Cristo
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Shaw as he won't play

        1. OptimusBlack
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          What ?

            1. OptimusBlack
              • 11 Years
              9 months, 8 days ago

              Thxxx

      3. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Shaw

    8. cruzex
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      time to sell salah?

      1. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I think I will.

      2. SEXY SOLO SAUCE FOR THE LAS…
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Why?

    9. Exuk41
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      drop Maddison for Foden (-4)

      1. boroie
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Probably yes

      2. I Must Break You
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I think so

    10. Steve The Spud
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Don’t make early transfers kids

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Someone is panicking about being priced out of his planned move 😉

    11. fgdu
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      shaw out to who

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I bet if I say Chilwell, you say you already own him

      2. I Must Break You
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Saliba if you don't have him too

    12. _Freddo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      This is it, locking it down, birthday tomorrow so I won’t be able to be at a screen all day, will miss any leaks & most team news so hope there’s no drama.

      Sanchez / Areola
      Chilwell / Saliba / Espitunan / Henry / Udogie
      Saka / Odegaard / Foden / Mbuemo / Luis Diaz
      Haaland / Álvarez / Wissa

      1.6m in the bank for Trippier, Jota or an 8.2 striker for Álvarez in a few weeks.

      1. AC/DC AFC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Good luck.

        Happy birthday in 9 mins?

      2. SEXY SOLO SAUCE FOR THE LAS…
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Looks good, happy birthday for tomorrow

        1. _Freddo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Thanks chaps.

      3. Øgaard it's Haa…
        • 1 Year
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Gook GK choice, possibly 🙂 Happy Birthday. BW. GL.

    13. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      UPDATE: #BHAFC’s Julio Enciso will be out for four months due to a meniscus tear.

      Won’t return until the beginning of next year and will miss the first six 2026 World Cup qualifiers for Paraguay.

      https://twitter.com/RobertoRojas97/status/1694838144942723405?t=rMMHaTGMdZDqA9kn2eZT5w&s=19

      1. SEXY SOLO SAUCE FOR THE LAS…
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        JOAO PEDRO TRAIN

        1. AC/DC AFC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          That was gw1.

          They're all boarding the Jackson express now.

          1. SEXY SOLO SAUCE FOR THE LAS…
            • 7 Years
            9 months, 8 days ago

            Both

    14. ZimZalabim
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      People here are really expecting Chelsea to do well over the next few weeks and are bringing in their players en masse and I have been in the same boat considering one or two of Jackson, Sterling and Gusto in various transfer options to join Chilwell in my team.

      But I just spoke at length to a Chelsea fan, friend of mine that doesn't play fpl and he sounds so downcast on Chelsea at the moment he thinks this run isn't going to be easy and they will struggle for goals, he says sterling and Jackson looked better in their overall general play this past weekend but neither looks even close to scoring, he feels its such a work in progress and they are missing creativity so badly that he suggests I steer clear of Chelsea for now regardless of who they are playing.

      That really wasn't what I was expecting and now im feeling very unsure on Chelsea assets.

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        I agree. Both look promising but there's a lot of players I prefer in the 6.5 - 7.5 range

    15. N00B
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Would you wildcard this team?

      1.5 itb, no transfers
      Johnstone
      Chilwell Estupinan Dias
      Rashford Bruno Saka Martinelli Mitoma
      Haaland Pedro

      Bench: Turner, Archer, Kabore, James*

      into this

      0.1 itb
      Flekken
      Chilwell Estupinan Dias
      Saka Martinelli Foden Mbeumo
      Haaland Watkins Jackson

      Bench: Turner, Mitoma, Udogie, Botman

      1. trixz
        • 2 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        not with the recent Enciso news

        1. Thomas Jerome Newton
          • 7 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          He doesn't have Enciso.
          You suggesting Beighton don't perform without him?

    16. Scout15
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Ok guys, help me out here. Which move should i make?

      A) Shaw+Richarlison -> Chillwell+Mbeuno
      B) Shaw+Joao Pedro -> Gustk + Jackson
      C) Shaw+Joao Pedri

      1. Scout15
        • 6 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        C) Shaw+Joao Pedro -> Porro + Wissa

        Sorry... 🙂

      2. trixz
        • 2 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        of course A

      3. I Must Break You
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        A, surely. Joao prospects much higher today on Enciso long term injury news

    17. boroie
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 8 days ago

      Do we think that Odegaard will take Arsenal’s next penalty?

      1. N00B
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 months, 8 days ago

        Yes

        1. boroie
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 8 days ago

          Thanks