42 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Biggsy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    12 days, 23 hours ago

    Sneaky sneaky me....

  2. Shark Team
    • 6 Years
    12 days, 23 hours ago

    How many pts for my bench: Areola Doughty Konsa Palmer (imo around 13-18)

    would you play BB now or WC35 BB37 better in your opinion?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 5 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      I can't see more than the lower end of that estimate so no to BB34

      1. Shark Team
        • 6 Years
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        Feels bad benching Palmer though… other options are Darwin or Haaland…

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 5 Years
          12 days, 22 hours ago

          I don't see how Palmer's ceiling will be high when it's away to Arsenal, best defence in the league and no double. Also Arsenal fixture is 3 days after FAC SF against City

  3. Mane Mane Mane
    • 3 Years
    12 days, 22 hours ago

    Without a wildcard and I can’t see any way of getting Son in after this week which is scaring me

    1. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      Spurs are meh

      1. Scalper
        • 7 Years
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        Sure but he’s one of the top scorers, and plays 5 times over 3 GWs from 35-37.

        1. Holmes
          • 10 Years
          12 days, 22 hours ago

          Fixtures arent great either. Maybe for 37 but not really required for 35

    2. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      • 3 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      I'll be going into next week with 2FTs and a fair bit of money itb and am not sure I'll even bother getting him personally

    3. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      I haven't done any WC drafts for 35, but I am not 100% on keeping him. I suspect if I need the budget, I could be tempted to punt on another midfielder from Spurs and go without (although that could be just as thorny finding someone with assured minutes and not in worse form).

  4. Bobby Digital
    • 6 Years
    12 days, 22 hours ago

    Anyone else planning FH37 BB38?

    1. Nate(U)dog(ie)
      • 3 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      Think BB38 is just too risky. Too many teams with nothing to play for, lot of rotation with youth players / fringe players getting rare games, etc.

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 6 Years
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        Yeah you might be right. I've planned for earlier BBs, but someone gets injured every time...

    2. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      I've tried BB38 before. 3 of my squad didn't feature so I end up with just 1 additional point.

  5. Maddamotha
    • 7 Years
    12 days, 22 hours ago

    Struggling to make up my mind. What would you do? WC 35. Bought Palmer 5.7

    A) Watkins, Leno > Darwin, Becker -4
    B) Palmer > Eze (bench Watkins)
    C) Watkins > Darwin (bench Palmer)
    D) Leno > Henderson (play Palmer and Watkins)

    Areola
    Gabriel, Zabarnyi, Ait-Nouri
    Salah, Saka, Havertz, Sarabia
    Watkins, Solanke, Haaland

    Leno, Palmer, Trusty, Taylor

    1. Bobby Digital
      • 6 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      C

    2. Bobby Digital
      • 6 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      or D

  6. CYN
    • 5 Years
    12 days, 22 hours ago

    Neto - Kelleher
    Van Hecke - Gabriel - Pau - Ait Nouri - Zabarnyi
    Saka - Havertz - Palmer - Son - Hudson Odoi
    Haaland - Solanke - Nunez

    2 FT. Son->Salah is the plan.

    Should I BB GW34?

    If so I would need to ditch Kelleher. No other chips left.

    Or try to work towards BB GW37?

    Any input would be appreciated.

    1. The Tonberry
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        I'd go with BB37

    2. Dotherightthing
      • 8 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      Choose one pls
      1 - VVD and B.Diaz
      2 - Senesi and L. Diaz
      Thank you

    3. Super John McGinn-
      • 11 Years
      12 days, 22 hours ago

      Wildcarding 35, Bench Boost 37

      Neto
      Gabriel, RAN, Zabarnyi
      Salah (C), Saka, Foden, Garnacho
      Haaland, Darwin, Solanke

      Turner, Palmer, Gusto, Bradley*

      2 FT 1.4 ITB

      A) Bradley + Foden > TAA + Brereton Diaz
      B) Bradley + Foden > VVD + Macallister/Eze
      C) Bradley + Garnacho > Mitchell + Eze
      D) Other

      1. The Tonberry
          12 days, 22 hours ago

          B - VVD and Eze

        • bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          12 days, 22 hours ago

          B bench Zabarnyi

          1. bitm2007
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            12 days, 22 hours ago

            Sorry C

      2. Smokey_Lowkey
        • 5 Years
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        Risky going without Haaland (bha) on FH this week? Would probably replace with Mateta/Cunha and will enable me to strengthen considerably elsewhere...

      3. Magic Zico
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        12 days, 22 hours ago

        Pick one each from A and B:
        A: 1. Robbo or 2. VVD
        B: 1. Eze or 2. Olise

        1. Stranger Mings
          • 3 Years
          12 days, 21 hours ago

          A2
          B1

        2. Super John McGinn-
          • 11 Years
          12 days, 21 hours ago

          VVD & Eze

      4. fplerosion
          12 days, 21 hours ago

          What's the thinking behind Munoz rather than Mitchell as the choice of Crystal Palace defender?

          1. Ibralicious
            • 9 Years
            12 days, 21 hours ago

            Cooler name

        • sankalparora07
            12 days, 21 hours ago

            Olise or Mateta on a FH?

            1. Camzy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              12 days, 21 hours ago

              Olise for me.

              1. sankalparora07
                  12 days, 21 hours ago

                  Just concerned about his mins.... hopefully he starts both

                  1. Camzy
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 13 Years
                    12 days, 21 hours ago

                    That's the risk. But the upside is that Olise has the 2nd highest xG/90 of any player in the league.

                    It's up to you to decide whether you're optimistic or pessimistic.

                    1. Camzy
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 13 Years
                      12 days, 21 hours ago

                      *He used to have it. Pretty sure he doesn't now but the upside is there basically.

                      1. Camzy
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 13 Years
                        12 days, 21 hours ago

                        Checked it back.

                        There are only 5 regular starting players ahead of Olise for mins/xGI - Salah, Palmer, KdB, Saka and Mbeumo.

                        1. sankalparora07
                            12 days, 21 hours ago

                            Cheers thanks..... that's helpful...think you are right

              2. Scalper
                • 7 Years
                12 days, 21 hours ago

                No FH or WC.

                Areola
                Saliba Gabriel Zab
                Saka Salah Palmer Olise
                Isak Haaland Cunha

                Gtg or take -4 somewhere? 3.7ITB

              3. theplayer
                • 10 Years
                12 days, 21 hours ago

                Who is the better combo for this GW? Olise + Haaland or Palmer + Mateta? I'll have Eze as one of my free transfers. Just to decide on Olise or Mateta as the other basically.

              4. Snoop Udogie Dogg
                • 3 Years
                12 days, 21 hours ago

                Any news on Areola - likely to next GW?

              5. Triggy
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 13 Years
                11 days, 22 hours ago

                Gutted to be out with a good score but at least I got a name check in the article