Community Submissions

Why Brad Pitt Would Win the Fantasy Premier League

A few months ago I settled down to watch Brad Pitt star in ‘Moneyball.’ It was a fairly average film, largely one-dimensional but lit up by the occasional chuckle-inducing witticism provided by Jonah Hill. It raised, however, intriguing questions on the idea of ‘value,’ and how our prejudices and preconceptions can have a negative effect on our capacity to make decisions in everyday life — not least in Fantasy Football. Specifically, I aim to explore two ideas: firstly, how to identify value by ignoring prejudice, and secondly, why thinking in terms of probability rather than certainty is the key to success.

Moneyball Theory Explained

The theme of Moneyball is based on the work of Bill James, a mathematician who used statistics to change perceptions in sport, and although the plot surrounds baseball, the principles can be applied to a large extent in football, and Fantasy games in particular. The theory can be summarised by the following quote from Jonah Hill’s character:

“It’s about getting things down to one number. Using the stats and the way we read them, we’ll find value in players that no one else can see. People are overlooked for a variety of biased reasons and perceived flaws. Age, appearance, personality. Bill James and mathematics cut straight through that.”

While I am not always one for statistics, this got me thinking about the ‘biased reasons and perceived flaws’ that prevent me from succeeding in Fantasy Football. Human beings are incapable of being totally objective — it is simply impossible. As a Man United fan, I probably do favour Wayne Rooney over Diego Costa, and as a fan who likes to see good football, perhaps it was my dislike of Branislav Ivanovic’s frequent play-acting that prevented me from drafting him in last term — to my own detriment.

Consciously or otherwise, we all allow emotions to interfere with our decisions. Players are disregarded because of their age, playing style, the unfashionable team they play for or even their ugly looks. If Stoke’s Jonathan Walters was a little less portly, had the dashing looks of a Cesc Fabregas, and played for a more fashionable side, his 3.1% ownership would be significantly higher. He offers fantastic value. He is a proven performer, with just shy of 600 points in the last 5 years, with a paltry price tag — and yet he is constantly overlooked because of a poor reputation and factors that are irrelevant to his output.

This same concept applies to teams, too: I was staggered, looking at the final league table, to discover that Sunderland have accrued as many clean sheets as Arsenal in 2014/15. They have had 47 in the last four seasons, and yet due to the odd hammering (Southampton and Villa come to mind) I have always seen them as a leaky, relegation-battling outfit. Subsequently, not once have I considered recruiting a Sunderland defender.

A Good First Impression

Person A is strong, gallant, brave, confident, cold-hearted, selfish and arrogant.

Person B is arrogant, selfish, cold-hearted, confident, brave, gallant, and strong.

First impressions are extremely powerful. After reading the above character descriptions, almost everyone prefers Person A because of the imprint left by the initial, positive personality traits. This can leave a bias that is difficult to overcome. In Fantasy terms, if you see a player for the first time and he has a bad game, or if you draft a new player in and he blanks, you are less likely to pick him again — even if he offers value.

In order to overcome bias, you need to first identify what exactly draws you to, or from, a player. Think carefully before discarding a player: is your dismissive attitude based on evidence, or personal prejudice? Only by realising the bias that affects our selection can we hope to overcome it — therefore, I implore you, when the prices are released in July, find a reason not to select a player before casting him aside.

Trust The Statistics

I have always held the same views as most football fans (and, indeed, critics of Bill James): that sport can’t be defined by numbers, it is not an exact science — there are intangibles that only an experienced spectator can spot. Footballers are not robots: they are human beings, inconsistent and imperfect, who cannot be judged by statistics.

But then I thought about it for a while, and it dawned on me: my opinions are irrelevant. I realised that it is precisely because football and its variables are so unpredictable that we need data to make informed decisions. As much as we like to think that we can predict outcomes of games, the truth is that the result itself is random. This fact is the reason bookmakers survive. Our best hope is to find the probability of an outcome using all the available data. This concept is hinted at by Billy Beane, the pioneering coach of a low-budget baseball side, in his criticisms of a disgruntled scout:

“You don’t have a crystal ball. You can’t look at a kid and predict his future any more than I can. I’ve sat at those kitchen tables with you and listened to you tell parents, “When I know, I know, and when it comes to your son, I know.” And you don’t — you don’t.”

Ultimately, whatever we like to tell ourselves, we cannot predict who will score at the weekend with any degree of certainty whatsoever. Football’s unpredictability, especially in the Premier League, is the reason we love it. We don’t have crystal balls, and we will never be right every time, whether we use statistics or not. You shouldn’t be asking “Will Hazard score at the weekend?” – you should be asking “What is the probability that he will score?” It doesn’t matter whether we think he will or not — Hazard himself isn’t bothered about that. Using evidence and/or your own knowledge, weigh up the probability of success.

Conclusion

Finally, to be clear: I often go with my gut over the statistics and take on a player who, on the evidence available, does not represent good value. Sometimes it pays off; mostly it doesn’t. This is my downfall as a manager, but I do it anyway for the heck of it. There is no correct way to assemble a baseball squad, or pick a Fantasy Football team. This article is intended not to preach, or to further the cases of individual players, but rather to encourage people to think about the impacts of their preconceptions, and the benefits of accepting our inability to predict Premier League matches. Furthermore, I simply wanted to share what I found to be an interesting concept, and provide an alternative perspective on how we all make decisions.

23 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Cheers for this. The Moneyball idea is something that's always good to return to, to help quash those illogical biases we all have in fantasy football.

  2. Stats Don\'t Lie
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Very good article, will keep this in mind next season.

    1. Bauerhaus 24
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Thanks man 🙂

  3. asquishypotato
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Unfashionable and odd choices are what fantasy football Scouter's live for (cue Ashley Young bandwagon)

  4. d1sable
    • Has Moderation Rights
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Great article and i love the money ball concept

    Two main issues though are that "value" is not as important as points and sometimes its hard not to get hung up on value. You could work out the best value players in the game and put them into an XI and it wouldn't win. Its finding the right balance of value players and heavy point scorers.

    Which brings me to my second point on captains, captaining a heavy point scorer can be far more lucrative than a vale player, granted i could get a good rank by just leaving it on a value player for decent returns but its that lottery on the point scorer that make me either fail to score well or explode that give you the real potential. If im lucky enough to hit the right point scorer each week ill greatly outperform the value option - yes its highly unlikely but many will manage it and its that allure to reach the top that means heavy point scorers regardless of value will always be favored.

    Of course theres nothing to say heavy scores cant also be great value e.g Kane but they are few and far between.

    1. Bauerhaus 24
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Cheers. Yep, can't argue with anything there - as I said, this was just something to throw out there for people to consider, do with it what you will

    2. The Mighty One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Great response to this article, Disable...this is the key point in way many of us need to use our WC in the first few weeks of every new season! We overthink the value idea and then we see a few monster scorers that we must have just 2 or 3 weeks after spending two months of analysis!

      Fill in your roster FIRST with the 2 or 3 best captain picks, regardless of price...then go with value to fill out your roster.

      Cheers to you and Swegshinji. Thanks guys.

    3. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      One "moneyball" tip: you have to look at your team value as a whole.

  5. John t penguin
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    nice read
    good to have article that is more of a reminder rather than claiming to know

    in the pursuit of knowledge everyday something is added, in the pursuit of wisdom everyday something is dropped.

    1. Bauerhaus 24
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Deep stuff 😉 aha thanks

  6. The Sarjeant
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Love this article, great work! You've given me a lot of food for thought and an urge to re-watch a film!

    1. Bauerhaus 24
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      🙂 thanks man

    2. d1sable
      • Has Moderation Rights
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Yep im going to re-watch again, i really liked it first time around.

  7. The Orienteer - find me in …
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Good stuff - reminds me to take a more measured approach to my team selections and look at probabilities a bit more, not just use gut feeling.

  8. Ginkapo FPL
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Nothing is random, we just havent found all the factors yet

  9. bibi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Overall I think it's better to trust stats than not, I 100% agree...and it's an easy way to ensure we make more right decisions than the wrong ones.

    Although one thing I learned this season, is that in the last few rounds where some teams fight for their lives and some already clinched the title, we should expect to see "spikes" in stats. Similarly around special events like International breaks, other soccer events, serious injuries, one should probably apply additional measures.

  10. Ryan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Really good article and a ni e reminder. It's often helpful to use stats to avoid bias and this helped me keep Giroud when he was benched in that week when we knew the lineups. He got back in the team and started a stellar run of form. Now I need to recognise when to sell and not let past results form a keep bias

  11. Margarido
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Great stuff.
    RMT should help in those decisions, right?

  12. OShaughnessy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    > You shouldn’t be asking “Will Hazard score at the weekend?” – you should be asking “What is the probability that he will score?”

    This, +100.

  13. Comment removed. Please refer to our terms and conditions on posting comments.

    1. Mull
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      No

  14. Clifford☯
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 4 months ago

    :crystal_ball: