Transfers

Market Forces – Gameweek 5

Another eventful Gameweek comes to a close, handing us possibly the biggest transfer bandwagon of the season so far.

Paul Pogba’s injury setback fuelled much market activity before the deadline, but that could pale in significance when compared with the return to prominence of an overlooked Fantasy legend.

This Gameweek, 7,142,233 total transfers were made – only a slight drop on the 7,863,661 last time out – suggesting that a high proportion of managers are very much involved with their squads and driving the current trends.

Continuing our series of weekly articles, we at whogottheassist.com are reviewing and commenting on behaviours in the Fantasy Premier League market place, looking at common themes and giving our view on the viability of the transfers taking place.

King Kun returns…

After a 20-point haul served notice of Sergio Aguero’s continued ability to strike fear into the hearts of both defences and non-owning Fantasy managers, Kun has returned to prominence with a bang.

Almost written off as playing second fiddle to Gabriel Jesus at the beginning of the season, the auto-captain of old has surely never scored such a huge tally while owned by so few.

Only 10% (he was in around 500,000 teams) were savvy enough to keep the faith with the Argentinian ahead of the trip to Watford.

A flurry of transfers has followed as FPL managers fall over themselves to work Aguero into their squads.

He’s already restored to his starting price of 11.5, having suffered a fall to 11.4 in the first few Gameweeks, with another overnight hike on the cards.

In the last 24 hours alone, we’ve seen more than 195,000 new managers swoop, with all manner of premium forwards – Romelu Lukaku, Roberto Firmino, Harry Kane and, to a lesser extent Alvaro Morata – all making way.

In some cases his strike partner Gabriel Jesus has been the makeweight, with almost 18,000 making an awkward and perhaps ill-fated sideways shuffle.

Both Kane (who recently rose back to 12.5 ahead of the “gimme” that never was against Swansea City) and Firmino (now 8.7) were recent bandwagons which seem to have been derailed by their own failings and the rise of Aguero.

Again, this demonstrates how fickle the market can be: one week’s hero becomes the next week’s zero.

However, the Lukaku sales are perhaps the most interesting factor.

Over 45,000 managers have now sold the United striker for his City rival, either before or even following the Belgian’s return of 12 points (goal, assist, max bonus) against his former club Everton.

Lukaku was also shedding owners prior to Sunday’s haul, with more than 101,000 moving him on ahead of Friday’s deadline.

The Belgian’s consistency – he’s now scored five in five – and huge ownership (still at over 50%) should obviously be considered prior to his sale, but we’re seeing many a manager blinded by the explosive potential of Aguero.

Perhaps Jose Mourinho’s comments suggesting that Lukaku has lost penalty duties is a factor. Maybe United’s disappointing performance on Sunday is another. Only time will tell if a switch from Lukaku to Aguero will pay off, but there’s no doubting the risk involved.

…and so does his assister

Another man to return to prominence is the diminutive wizard David Silva, whose 11 points at Watford would have delighted his near-150,000 new Gameweek 5 owners.

Silva was a major beneficiary of sales of Paul Pogba, with 60,818 of his new managers swapping him in for the Frenchman.

Our memories of sepia-tinged seasons past were reanimated in watching City’s display against the Hornets.

Silva’s pair of assists – he’s up to four for the season – supplied Aguero’s second goal and also a first of the season for Nicolas Otamendi (another to rise in price). Throughout Saturday’s display, Silva’s silky, string-pulling performance, reminded us of his qualities and hinted at a new potency as an FPL asset.

Now at 8.3 (0.3 up from a kind starting price of 8.0), if he’s able to build on this start he may also prove to be an irresistible force to sit alongside a City striker in our squads.

Many already think so: 168,000+ have brought in Silva since Friday’s deadline, no doubt hoping that the Spaniard will fill his boots in Gameweek 6’s fixture against a struggling Crystal Palace.

Speaking of assisters…

Armenian playmaker Henrikh Mkhitaryan also continues to see his ownership flourish.

He recorded a first goal of the season on Sunday, rewarding 317,647 new owners ahead of Gameweek 5. Of those, a total of 185,996 were straight swaps from his stricken team-mate Pogba.

Another 76,000+ Pogba owners have also swapped in Mkhitaryan following Sunday’s nine-point return.

Mkhitaryan is the first player to have risen a full 0.5 from his starting price – giving his early adopters a 0.2 in selling value – and he is only the second player to earn more than a million transfers since the start of the season, along with defender Ahmed Hegazi at West Brom.

Gross rush puts Ritchie in the shade

Following up on his astonishing 18-point haul versus West Brom, Brighton playmaker Pascal Gross was on hand to supply the assist for Solly March at Bournemouth on Friday night.

Despite the fact that his side went down 2-1, he still accrued a couple of bonus points to move into fourth in the midfield standings.

With blanks for many of the past flavours of the week in his price bracket – Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting, Richarlison, Jese and Aaron Mooy spring to mind – Gross’ second week of returns has excited FPL managers. Some 84,475 have picked him up in the last 24 hours and more than 150,000 have brought him in since Friday’s tally.

Some have seen an immediate return from making the direct switch from Pogba, with 23,559 swapping to him ahead of Gameweek 5, and 31,000+ taking that route since.

Gross’ returns appear to have blinded managers to another stand-out performer in the same bracket.

Newcastle United’s Matt Ritchie, who has assisted in the past four matches in all competitions, has enjoyed only modest interest. Mrre than 69,000 have brought him in, just over a third of the 182,000 who have turned to Brighton’s Gross.

Now valued at 5.6, having risen overnight, it could be that the minor difference in price (0.3 now) is causing the disparity.

(Limited) wind in Lascelles

Staying with the Magpies, their captain Jamaal Lascelles rose to 4.6 in the early hours.

Despite his match-winning goal last week against Swansea City, the centre-back attracted only 66,329 new owners ahead of Gameweek 5, surprisingly lagging behind his defensive team-mates Jesus Gamez (72,879), Ciaran Clark (75,847) and keeper Rob Elliot (104,125).

After scoring his second goal in two outings, though, we have seen him shoot to prominence, with 158,000+ bringing him in ahead of Gameweek 6.

More than 19,000 have downgraded the suspended David Luiz to the Magpies’ skipper.

However, there could be a natural cap in the interest Lascelles will generate, with the availability of 4.0/4.1 options from Newcastle in the form of Chancel Mbemba and bargain-bucket keeper Rob Elliot.

Those two are again picking up interest, with more than 63,000+ turning to Mbemba after his unexpected outing against Stoke City, and almost 38,000+ acquiring Elliot in goal ahead of a Gameweek 6 trip to Brighton.

Will he Otamendi a Luiz-shaped hole?

A final mention goes to the rise of Argentine brawler-cum-defender Nicolas Otamendi, who is picking up traffic off the back of his 12-point goal and clean sheet haul at Watford.

Over 118,000 have acquired his services so far as he picks up significant owners from Luiz’s suspension – almost 33,000 have brought him in as a direct swap for the banned Chelsea defender.

Otamendi has demonstrated a surprising goal threat: a post denied him a first goal at Bournemouth before his strike against Watford. Indeed, only Marcos Alonso can better his seven shots on goal so far among defenders.

But with Vincent Kompany nearing a return, we can’t yet rule out Guardiola’s rotation policy and a first stint on the bench. Given our experience with Ben Davies in Gameweek 5, there is perhaps a need for caution.

Conclusion

The return of Aguero and his sidekick Silva have definitely shaken things up, with many managers no doubt coming to the realisation that City can no longer be ignored.

It’s true that the early template had overlooked City due to Guardiola’s inconsistent teamsheets, but there are now two factors at play.

For one, the City boss appears to be reducing the severity of his rotation – certainly, that’s in evidence to this point. Secondly, his attacking options have proved their ability to blow through teams in such explosive fashion that their potential returns perhaps outweigh any risks at play.

The market continues to revolve, with little sign of order being restored as yet. This is highlighted by Firmino and Kane’s fall from grace, alongside a conveyor belt of mid-price midfielders that shift in and out of favour.

Before Gameweek 5 we saw 223,767 Wildcards played. However, we wonder if, with a shift in fixtures for Chelsea, Everton and Man City approaching, coupled with the latter’s red-hot form, if that number might be surpassed this week.

This could cause another dramatic change in the market, with some assets suddenly commanding a much larger ownership base. Wildcard purchases do not count toward price rises/falls – but they could certainly influence trends to come, depending on whether the popular targets fire or fail.

Either way, expect more turbulence as we move out of the first five Gameweeks and things perhaps begin to settle, with template squads firming up.

Nick and Tom WGTA We're Individual and Matamatics on FFS, and started our own site to add our voice to the FPL community and for FFS in particular.

3,358 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Does 'coverage' work?
    FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Lots of @FPLVirg posts asking about coverage.

    Personally I think it is a great idea and a viable strategy. "You can't have them all" so sometimes you have to cover the players in the big teams because big teams are the most likely to score big points.

    This is why I'll be getting Silva or Mendy in this week; to "cover" Man City's points.

    Coverage is good. Coverage works.

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Good luck with that.

    2. fedolefan
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Coverage for a hit or Coverage for free?

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Free.

    3. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      5-0, Silva 3 points.
      6-0 Mendy 6 points.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        5-0 Mendy 10 points.
        6-0 Silva 11 points.

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Best case vs realistic case.
          Imagine Benteke manages a goal.

          2 each 😆 in a 5-1

          1. FPL Virgin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            That makes no sense.

            Just because a high profile FPL manager like Andy is against coverage doesn't necessarily mean he is right.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              Jesus wasn't great "cover" for Aguero last GW.
              Could easily be the opposite this weekend.

              1. COYS Down Under
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 8 months ago

                I'm covered by owning both.

                1. TorresMagic™
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 14 Years
                  6 years, 8 months ago

                  Probably the best way.

                2. Fatboy Fatboy
                  • 8 Years
                  6 years, 8 months ago

                  Just did the same

      2. Hubert
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Isn't this cherry picking TM?

        5-0 Mendy 10 points
        6-0 Silva 11 points

        Works both ways 🙂 Both are viable options aren't they?

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Pep can easily cherry pick Mendy or Silva to the bench 😉
          There isn't a guarantee that they will score well in a cricket score.
          The 2 scores above prove that or else they would have double figures in both games.
          If I want Man City cover, they aren't the avenues I'd really want but for the price, might do the job.

          1. Hubert
            • 11 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            Yes Yes, and he might rest Agueru/Jesus too. I've gone with Kun myself, but I wouldn't mind all three 🙂

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              Very true. CL midweek is a big factor and maybe a clue on Wednesday in the Cup.

        2. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Yes. They are.

          Which is why he responded with a weird point about Benteke. He never admits when he is wrong.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            There's no guarantee City get a clean sheet so the point is valid. Picking 2 games with a clean sheet is in a way cherry picking towards Mendy.

            1. FPL Virgin
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              Your argument that they could only get 2 points could apply to literally any player. Including Aguero.

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 14 Years
                6 years, 8 months ago

                So you agree "cover" is a myth. Cheers.
                Firmino covers Salah points. Sanchez cover Kolasinac points.
                Good luck with your idea.

    4. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      But with scores like 5 or 6 nil of course there is going to be coverage from players within the same team. At the end og the day you need to figure out who on each team you draft will get points. An Eriksen assist that "covers" Kane is not as good as 2 goals by a striker on Huddersfield etc..

    5. Albrightondknight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Yeah think I will get both too and C alternate weeks. Should easily negate the need to have Kane Kun or even Sanchez. 🙂

      1. Albrightondknight
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Seriously I think having Kun and Jesus is a nice way to cover City attack when fixtures are good.

    6. waldo666
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      How can they cover Aguero when he bangs five in all assisted by others?

      1. Gnu
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Hope you're open to bribes Waldo? 😉

        1. waldo666
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Hahaha, if the price is right!

          1. Gnu
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            You kinda slipped under the radar a bit and of course a lot of money thrown at the well known posters.
            You'll be fine this time round. 🙂

      2. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        We'd all like Aguero but without endless cash and transfers you have to turn to coverage.

        1. waldo666
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Sure with their form and fixtures it would be good to get their players in and obviously they have to be within your budget unless you're prepared to undergo some surgery however to say they give you coverage (almost suggesting you'll get a piece of the points pie just cos you have them) is a fallacy imo.

    7. Too Mane Men
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Coverage is simply the idea that missing out on a certain team's form is perceived as a disadvantage. In reality we should only choose any player based on potential points scored. Man City players may be more likely to score, but at the same time you could choose the wrong City player when you could have picked up Kiko Fermina, Matt Ritchie or Pascal Groß and used the extra funds to own Kolasinac. City will still score lots of goals, you may or may not benefit from that. Just like any other player in any other team. The only expeptions are players such as Eriksen, Lukaku, Kane, Morata, Mhki who play such an important role in their team's goal creation/scoring that consistent point returns are almost assured across the entire season.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        You can't get Eriksen, Lukaku, Kane, Morata, Mkhi in the same team and so you have to turn to coverage to compensate.

        1. noquarternt
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Yes you can

          1. FPL Virgin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            Not comfortably. And not with a well balanced team.

            1. noquarternt
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              With players like Jones, Atsu and Dawson, you honestly can

        2. Rash
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          I will have those but kun instead of morata

    8. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I read those @FPLVirg posts as "are you overage?"

    9. noquarternt
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Coverage doesn't really mean anything aside from clean sheet points. Stones can 'cover' Mendy's clean sheet chances if they both play.

      Attacking wise, you have to look at xG, xA, heatmaps and other metrics. Can Silva 'cover' Agüero? No. Is Silva a good option considering his price, chance creation and shot volume? Yes.

      So yes get him, but not because he can 'cover' him, but because he's a good selection in his own right.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        For some reason, Coverage is a trigger word that gets people's backs up. If people calm down and stop to think about it, they will see there is merit to it.

        1. noquarternt
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          There honestly isn't, or you could use it with consistency. You're already picking quality options. Would you get Fernandinho/Kante/Matic? They're really cheap midfielders mostly nailed playing for good attacking teams at super cheap prices. We know they can't 'cover' other players' points so no one has them. You should frame it as;

          Silva is a good option. Mendy is a good option. I'm picking them because they are good FPL options for their prices and play for a good attacking team that is currently keeping clean sheets.

    10. Cok3y5murf
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      LOL. Attacking coverage is a load of rubbish.

    11. Snibal
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I think a lot of people misinterpret the meaning of coverage. Saying that Jesus didn't cover for Aguero's points is completely misunderstanding the point of coverage. Yes, in last weekend's match you'd ideally have Aguero, but if you can't afford him because you chose to have for example Kane, Lukaku and Firmino then Silva would at least 'cover' some of the points scored. I think the idea is that you choose the players you think will score the most points, but there are always players you don't own and are capable of big hauls. By having a player of that big haul player in your team you at least cover yourself a bit. For example; if I'm selling Kane for Aguero then I do feel a bit better to at least own Eriksen. When Kane goes crazy it's likely that Eriksen will also at least score some points. Of course I'd prefer to have Kane's points, but you just can't own all players every week who score big.
      Essentially it's a matter of spreading your risk; you have 2-3 players which you think are most likely that score the most points but there could be 1-2 players you can't afford, but can try to cover their points with cheaper options.

      1. Cok3y5murf
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        In your example, Eriksen doesn't affect Kane's points. You're talking about Eriksen + Kane vs Eriksen + Aguero. Eriksen is in both these combinations, so it's really just Kane vs Aguero. So Eriksen doesn't even have anything to do in this debate.

        If you think Kane can go crazy, why sell him for Aguero? Just because he plays for a different team? Just because you can cover 2 teams instead of one? What difference does it make? Only the points count.

        You're not spreading the risk, you're making yourself believe that you are just because they're from different teams. It's psychological. If you think Kane can go crazy this week, you just shouldn't sell him, period. There is a risk involved in every single move. Selling Kane irrespective of whether you own Eriksen is just as risky, because their points are individual and not necessarily always shared, like Aguero and Jesus last week, for example.

        1. Snibal
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Like I said, I think ( theoretically, not saying it is my own opinion) Aguero will do better than Kane which is why I'm getting Aguero. However, I realize that Spurs is a very good side and might win with a big margin on any day. I can't have both Aguero AND Kane, but I can have Aguero + Eriksen. Or I can have Kane + Silva. If I have 20m to spend I prefer to spend it on the striker that will score me the most points, but getting a midfielder that plays for the team that is 2nd most likely to score a lot of goals.

          1. Cok3y5murf
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            If this is about funds available, that's a different issue. You have to go with what you can afford.

            But funds aside, this is simply about Aguero vs Kane and Silva vs Eriksen. And picking the two that you think will score more. Whether they're from the same teams or different teams is irrelevant, making 'coverage' irrelevant.

            1. Snibal
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              Of course it's relevant. If I think Spurs and City will be the 2 most scoring teams, but can't afford the 2 most scoring guys I will go for the most scoring guy of team A and 2nd most scoring guy of team B.

              1. Cok3y5murf
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 8 months ago

                "but can't afford the...."

                Yes, because as I said, funds is a different issue. Read what I said.

                1. Snibal
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 10 Years
                  6 years, 8 months ago

                  With unlimited funds coverage doesn't matter and you just get the highest scoring players. That's not the case though is it?

                  1. Cok3y5murf
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 8 months ago

                    You're missing the point.

                    Read this, you may understand.

                    http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2017/09/19/analysing-coverage/?hc_page=1#hc_comment_16522087

                    1. Snibal
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 10 Years
                      6 years, 8 months ago

                      This is like talking to a wall, pointless. Good luck

                      1. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        Lol. Only the delusional coverage believer is going to need it.

                      2. Snibal
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 10 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        Your history shows you'll need it 🙂

                      3. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        Says the guy with a fake team link 😆

                        Only this season points matter, kid.

                      4. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        season's*

                      5. Snibal
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 10 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        hahaha sure keep telling yourself that genius

                      6. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        LOL. 1.1m rank. 😆

                        Get up to my level 😛

                      7. Snibal
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 10 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        Let's hope for your sake that you'll start to understand the principle of coverage, maybe this can be the first season you'll get a higher GW38 rank than me 😉

                      8. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        If you must know, I was a casual until the middle of last season. I didn't even know this site existed until then.

                        Bookmarked, kid. See you in GW38. Until then, enjoy the view from 1.1m 😉

                      9. Snibal
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 10 Years
                        6 years, 8 months ago

                        Ahh so your excuse is that you were unable to think for yourself for 4 seasons long? Just kidding, rascal. Enjoy/Good Luck, see you in 33 GW's

                      10. Cok3y5murf
                        • 7 Years
                        5 years, 11 months ago

                        Just remembered this. You lose 😛

                      11. Irish Madridista ⭐
                        • 13 Years
                        5 years, 11 months ago

                        We can all see who really lost this exchange 🙂

                      12. Gnu
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 14 Years
                        5 years, 11 months ago

                        ...and it's not the bitter & twisted one.....

        2. TopdeBotton
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          My squad currently consists of the following: 3 United, 2 Liverpool, 2 Southampton, 2 Swansea, 1 Chelsea, 1 Tottenham, 1 Watford, 1 Palace, 1 Brighton and 1 West Brom.

          That's 10 different clubs I am "covering".

          Realistically, it's more like 8, because I have Myhill and Rosenior.

          In fact, so far this season, I have covered 8 teams in 3 GWs and 7 in 2 GWs.

          In my front 7 I have covered either 4 or 5 clubs depending on the GW.

          That is probably fine as long as I am picking the right players from the right clubs ... but what if I gamble on triple United and triple Tottenham for a period of a few GWs where I judge these two as having good fixtures and form but they end up not scoring more than two in each game?

          That's 6 of my front 7 covered by two clubs that are arguably underperforming. Is that good coverage? Even if it's 4 or 5, in a low scoring GW that could be bad.

          In actual fact, there have been four quite bad GWs so far this season and arguably, people here are doing badly because they've gambled on the wrong teams and have been too stubborn to admit that with slightly more diversified coverage they would be doing better but I digress.

          In the first 5 GWs, I've covered either 3 or 4 of last season's top 6 in my front 7.

          I sold De Bruyne in GW2 and have not had any City since; I have had 0 Arsenal all season.

          I'm on 289 points so I've done OK so far but I will only have Alli in GW6 and will have zero City or Arsenal coverage unless I make a transfer.

          I could risk it and maybe I'd be OK, but is it advisable only having 1 player in total from Tottenham and City combined?

          Personally, I'm happy with my squad and may only trade Firmino for Vardy. I may also trade Morata for Jesus and then WC Morata and/or Firmino back in for GW8.

          I don't think I'll be having Kane or Aguero because that would involve a hit but there's a good chance Morata or Firmino will be gone because I have to concede that Tottenham have two very good fixtures and City have one.

          TL;DR: Not covering certain teams and/or covering the wrong teams is a gamble that won't end well in certain GWs.

          1. Cok3y5murf
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            So you're talking about spreading the risk because putting all your eggs in one basket could go horribly wrong because we can sometimes get our predictions about outcomes in easy fixtures wrong. I get it. This is what makes everyone go for coverage, including me in the past.

            But come on, how often do they go wrong that badly? Now I'm not one to recommend triple ups in your front 7, I agree the risk factor is a little more there (However I did own Kane, Alli and Eriksen at the same time at one point last season and it really worked). But double ups are totally fine. We have to be bold in this game, and if we're just going to play safe, we're not going to do any better than others.

            Now let's say you are spreading the risk. So you're advising to get one player from each top side. Unfortunately for you, attacking coverage is still a gamble in itself. These are individual players with individual points that aren't necessarily shared like clean sheet points.

            Mkhitaryan practically (not technically) assisted Lukaku in the Stoke game but didn't get it because Lukaku missed it the first time. Was he able to cover him?

            Man City won 6-0. Yet Aguero got 20 points and Jesus got 6. Was Jesus able to cover him? Now Aguero's assist covered Jesus' goal, I get it, but what about the rest of the points? The two weren't involved in anything else together. This is the problem with attacking coverage. There is no way to predict which player from which team is going to successfully reward you for coverage, so you may as well go with the best picks, irrespective of teams.

            Now for this weekend, I have 2 United, 2 Spurs and 1 Liverpool in my front 7. None from City and Arsenal. For this week, I would like to have 3 City. However for next week, I would like to have no City. Since we can only make investments for a bunch of fixtures in this game and not every single fixture, I feel I'd rather have United and Spurs double ups for the next 2 weeks than having City players. After that, I would probably sell my two United players and replace them with 2 City (as the fixtures turn).

            Just need to be confident in our predictions.

            1. TopdeBotton
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 8 months ago

              If I had 2FT, I would bring in Kane or Aguero but I don't, so I might make do with Jesus.

              I might also conclude that Vardy and Morata will insure me against a Kane and/or Aguero haul.

              I'm happy with my team but I don't want two more low scoring GWs and having a City striker might spare me that.

    12. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I've always been a big fan of covering the big boys.

    13. Philman
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Bit late to the party, but coverage is a myth, simple.

      The idea of FPL is that you use your budget to get the players that will score you the most points you can. If they happen to come from teams that are scoring for fun, then that's understandable. You don't get a player because of who he plays for, but because of how many points you think he'll score.

      Gross is a typical example of this. They are hardly a free scoring team, but his 100% goal involvement makes him excellent value, it would seem.

      I think many of us (including me) fell for the coverage trap when selecting KDB in GW1. I'll say no more on that one.

      And it is well documented that last years FPL winner had a zero Pool policy, when Pool were scoring for fun at times. Another nail in the coverage coffin 🙂

      1. TopdeBotton
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        It didn't work out very well for him in 2013/14 though, did it?

        City players have done OK for the most part but honestly, Pep's to blame, not the idea of coverage.

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          In 2013/14 Suarez was essential and it was also good to own Sturridge and/or Gerrard for at least part of the season.

          But that was because all three were getting plenty of goals and assists and outscoring players from other teams, not just because Liverpool were the highest-scoring team.

          Suarez, Sturridge and Gerrard were not the only players who represented Liverpool that season, but the other Liverpool players would not have covered the points of those three, and Sturridge or Gerrard would not have covered Suarez.

          Last season, Liverpool's attacking points were shared between five different midfielders, but there were five players from other clubs who scored more points than any of them, so it was not essential to own even one Liverpool player.

  2. SolidSnape
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Foster - (Elliot)
    Davies - Mee - Ake- (Hegazi)- (Long)
    Eriksen - Salah - Mikhi - Mooy - (Carroll)
    Kane - Lukaku - Chicharito

    1 FT 0 ITB

    A) Ake to Naughton
    B) Ake + Chicharito > Naughton + Rooney (-4)

    1. RESULT
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Probably naughton looking at fixtures more essential. Rooney more of your gut feeling, will he outscore Rooney by at least 2 goals over next two fixtures?

  3. RESULT
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Advice please,My team
    Foster Elliott
    Alonso Davies Dawson mee hunemier
    Silva Willian Fraser iwobi Carroll
    Kane lukaku Jesus
    2ft 0.4itb

    A. Kane n Dawson to aguero kola
    B. Iwobi n Dawson to atsu kola
    C. One transfer only, but which one
    D. WC

    1. JogaSemmedo
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Do like A both great form & fixtures

      1. JogaSemmedo
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Just noticed you have Jesus & Silva. Could be overkill on City & leave you without any Spurs attack

    2. Scout15
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      B imo

    3. Sam1878
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Willian to Richie, iwobie to Brady? Team looks alright apart from the midfield

      1. RESULT
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Appreciate the feedback guys

  4. JogaSemmedo
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    No City cover in attack

    A) Kane > Kun
    B) Erisken & Firmino > Silva & Jesus for -4
    C) Go without save FT

    1. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      A but would rather C, i've come to the conclusion that it's too much fuss

    2. dark91
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Lots will say A but i prefer C or play your free hit chip and bring in 3 City players

  5. oscarhs
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Foster Elliot
    Davies Jones Bertrand Mbemba Rangel
    Eriksen Mkhi Mooy Tadic Carroll
    Lukaku Kane Firmino

    1FT 1.2 ITB

    Thinking of doing
    Firmino -> Jesus, Tadic -> RLC, Bertrand -> Kola for 8pt hit

    Thoughts?

  6. Big Col
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Dawson or Yoshida to kolasinac?

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Dawson

    2. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Dawson, Brom have horrendous fixtures on the horizon

    3. dark91
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Yoshida since he is losing his place

      1. Balance
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        This

      2. Test Eagles
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Is VVD back now?

        1. Big Col
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Think he'll be eased in.

        2. dark91
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          He is getting some game time.
          But Yoshiflda was even benched last game or the one before without VVD even being back in full contention

  7. cuervos
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    I want to take out Stephens so
    a) Straight swap with Cedric (MUN)
    b) Burnley defender (+.5)
    c) Him and Bailly to Jones and Kola (-4)

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      a is probably not worth as it is unlikely you would want to play southampton defence this week. c is not worth either I would hold.

    2. Balance
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      B if u want the Burnley def Long term otherwise save

  8. Afghanistanislas
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Foster Elliot
    Davies Jones Cedric Fernandez Mbemba
    Eriksen Mkhitaryan Ritchie Chalobah Carroll
    Lukaku Firmino Kane
    (2.1 ITB)

    I was set on getting Kolasinac this week but Aguero has made me re-think...would it be unwise to do Mkhitaryan and Firmino > Groß and Aguero for a hit, and do Fernandez > Kolasinac next week?

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Very sideways trades

    2. Balance
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I would get kola and ignore Kun... But that's me

    3. AF90
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Was thinking of your exact 2 transfers for free but want Mhki for the next 2GW's so decided against it...so wouldn't do it for a -4.

      I've ended up swapping Morata though so maybe had a slightly easier decision.

  9. Chandler Bing
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Bottomed

    Just seen the highlights for the Palace Southampton game. Why did Tadic not get an FPL assist for his rebound before Davis hit the goal?

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I was wondering the same thing actually, did it touch a defender in the meanwhile??

      1. Chandler Bing
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        I don't think so.. at least not from the angle shown in the clip I watched.

    2. Ghost Gooner
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      He was crossing but the keeper deflected it to Davis who wasn't the intended recipient of the cross.

    3. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Wasn't a shot on goal.

    4. noquarternt
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      It was a cross that had its trajectory dramatically altered by the goalkeeper.

  10. Red Dagger ✪
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    About when to play your WC...There is an argument for holding a WC too long especially if you are waiting for player to "come good" or burning points to chase points by jumping on bandwagons too late. Sometimes a refresh is all you need and I think it simply depends on the season itself. For example last season we were not sure who the top teams and players were early on. This year it's pretty clear it's going to be the Manchester teams. Also last season we were seeing a lot of points racking up in midfield but this season it's the forwards and defenders that are dominating. At the end of the day at least for me you play your wildcard when you feel it's the right time to make a move. If you are riding high then that's later. If you need to get back into the mix that's now. But if you wait too long then it's simply too late to make a difference because teams become template by that point anyway.

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I agree with this. There are many many people who have chased points with their wildcards this season and are worse off having used it. I think when you need to make 4-5 changes to your team it's time to pull the trigger, and as you say we now know what the landscape looks like.

    2. Thoughtopsy
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Played it this week, brought in three from city in Jesus, silva and mendyi

    3. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I played mine this week too. I've taken a risk and invested up front and at the back...

    4. noquarternt
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      You need to play it when you need it.

      Some people would've had Pogba and Mané. Combined with a few underperformers, that would've been the perfect time.

  11. Reed_Rothchild
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Ok found a way to have a Kaku, Aguero, and Kane front line with Salah, Richie, and Gross in midfield and Otamendi, B Davis, and Jones backline.

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Go on ...

    2. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Very similar to my team but I have Mkhi and Brady in my midfield with Salah

    3. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Like this..?

      Elliot
      Jones Stones Davies Naughton
      Miki Salah Atsu
      Agureo Kane Lukaku

      Nordfelt Mbemba Chalobah Carroll

    4. noquarternt
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Very similar to mine

      Elliot
      Davies Bellerin Mawson Jones
      Mhki Ritchie Salah
      Lukaku Jesus Kane

      4.0, Carroll, Mbemba, King

      0.2 ITB

  12. Sam1878
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    For me it comes down to a choice between:

    A) hold with Mhki, Erickson & Firmino
    B) Atsu, Erickson & Kun
    C) Mhki, Kun, Richie

    All options include Salah, Kane and Lukaku who I can't justify selling.

    1. cuervos
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      a

    2. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      A

    3. Sam1878
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      A's what I'm leaning towards as well - really want Aguero and feel like I'll get burnt with no city players, but it's hard to justify loosing any of the main players I've got now (apart from maybe firmino but haven't got the money to upgrade him without loosing one of the others)

    4. Balance
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      A or B

      Probably A for me

  13. FFSbet.com
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Addicted to hits,very tempted to go
    Miki+Mee+Jones > Mendy+Kola+4.5mid (-8)

    so it will be switch to 4-3-3
    Fabs/Elliot
    Alonso/Davies/Mendy/Kola/4.0
    Silva/Alli/4.5/4.5/4.5
    Kane/Morata/Firmino

    Yes/No?

    1. FFSbet.com
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I can go Atsu instead of 4.5 but i will need money for Silva>Mane in few weeks.

    2. Big Col
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Absolutely Not! I would transfer the other way!

      1. FFSbet.com
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Hmm...Kola+Mendy very nice fixtures.

        1. Big Col
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          United have a winnable game this week and they play Palace next week, Mee also has a decent fixture this week. Mendy could easily get benched and your losing 8 hard earned points to do it.

          1. FFSbet.com
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            Will hold,thanks.

    3. Schliegs
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      no

  14. Big Col
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    To free up cash Sell Eriksen or Alli ?

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Alli

  15. fedolefan
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Romelu Lukaku
    He's our belgian scoring genius
    :
    :
    lol

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Haha ... had to google it, but very funny!

  16. cruzex
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Shaqiri or Jese??

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Are they your only two options?

      1. cruzex
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Yes. i need a midfield till 6,5...

        1. Test Eagles
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Choupo-Motong?

        2. Skyarm
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          gross or brady as well

        3. RealSocialDads
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 8 months ago

          Ritchie

          1. cruzex
            • 11 Years
            6 years, 8 months ago

            i have atsu..

  17. El Lobito 10
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Vardy or Lukaku? Serious question - Vardy's fixtures are brilliant, Lukaku's not great after Palace

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I've got Vardy in on my WC but waiting to hear about his injury. Groin injuries aren't to be taken lightly, i can see him resting. In which case I'll bring Laca in for one week then ditch for Vardy when he's fit.

    2. Big Col
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      I'd stick with Romelu

    3. AF90
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Looking at Vardy GW8 for Firmino

  18. cruzex
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    RMT 0-10

    Elliot
    Martina Lowe Jones
    Alexis Shaqiri Mkhitarian Atsu
    Kane Kun Firmino

    Bench: Foster Carroll Cedric Moreno

    TY

    1. El Lobito 10
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      6

    2. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      5

    3. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Pretty weak Defence and Alexis is a concern until we see more minutes and form. 6.5/10

    4. Nigawan
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      sell: firmino , alexis, shaqiri, martina
      buy: vardy, salah, gross, kola/mendy

  19. FPL_JAAFAR
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Will the second ft be added for the week after i use my free hit chip.
    Thanks

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Nope

      1. FPL_JAAFAR
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Cheers

  20. cruzex
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Shaqiri on pens?

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Should be

  21. Scout15
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    I think that Morata has better fixtures than Kaku but not sure what to do...
    Thoughts?

    A) Lukaku->Kun
    B) Morata->Kun
    C) none

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      B no question

    2. AF90
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Just did Morata out myself, can see it backfiring but next 2 fixtures aren't the easiest....could bring back after that

  22. Abusive_Sgt_Daelrhos
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    What do I do here, do i swap Kun and Lukaku for Palace(I got Jesus) or something else, got 1FT and 0.0 itb, thanks!

    Eliott, Foster
    Alonso, Bertrand, Bavies, Mee, Rangel
    Salah, Alli, Mikhi, Brady, Romeu
    Jesus, Lukaku, Moonie

    1. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Alli to Miki and Jesus to Kun.

  23. Rash
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Can or atsu

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Atsu

    2. We Will Klopp you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Atsu, Can a rotation risk and when he does play could end up deepest midfielder if Henderson doesn't play

    3. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Atsu

    4. Rash
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Thanks

  24. Skyarm
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    RMT out of 10 please

    Elliot (Foster)
    Otamendi Jones Naughton Schindler (Cedric)
    Salah Mkhi Brady (Cork Carroll)
    Kane Kun Kaku

    Any trade suggestions welcome thanks

    1. Red Dagger ✪
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Very good.

    2. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      The thing i like about that forward line (aside from all the potential points) is that if you need to downgrade to a Vardy or Firmino it frees up 2-3 to spend in the midfield at the same time.

      1. Skyarm
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Yeah or even to Wood and upgrade to a Haz/Sanchez

  25. Sonder
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    RMT

    Foster, Elliot
    Jones, Cedric, Naughton, Schindler, Mbemba
    Eriksen, Salah, Mhki, Richarlison, RLC
    Kane, Lukaku, Chicarito

    0.4 ITB, 2 FT

    I'm considering Chicarito --> Joselu and/or Richarlison --> Ritchie/Choupo/etc. Any opinions? yay or nay?

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      yay

      1. We Will Klopp you
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Ritchie and I'd prefer wood to Joselu unless you need the cash

    2. Jafalad
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      You must be the only poster not considering CTY options.

    3. Balance
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Both good moves to me, probably Ritchie

  26. MartialMatas
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Any reason to wait on tfm to naughton? Is it the right move?

    Begovic Elliot
    Bavies Jones TFM Mee Long
    Eriksen Salah Mkhi Ramsey Carroll
    Kane Lukaku Abraham

    0.3itb 2ft

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Yeah pull that ASAP, he might rise in price before long. Alternatively Begovic > Fabianski

      1. MartialMatas
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Thanks

    2. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Looks like the most concerning problem if you're keen on Abraham and Ramsey

      1. MartialMatas
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 8 months ago

        Not particularly keen on them but I don't see any better options without tearing apart my team

  27. Lav
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Morata to Aguero
    Luiz to 5.1 or less

    Do this for a -4?

    1. Rash
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Yes Jones

    2. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Definitely

    3. AF90
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Yeah Jones or Maguire

  28. COYG
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    G2G? have 0ft and .4 itb

    fabianski
    kolasinac cedric naughton
    salah mkhi silva groß
    kane lukaku vardy

    elliot mariappa gamez carroll

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      Very nice gtg

  29. rl248
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Wildcarding...your thoughts are most welcome:

    Foster / Elliott

    Alonso / Kolas / Jones / Naughton / Mbemba

    Salah / Mata / Ramsey / Atsu / Carroll

    Kane / Kun / Vardy

    1.) Mata because of penalty duties and he's due to no longer blank?
    2.) Ramsey - Arsenal have easy next 3 and are due goals.

    1. Skyarm
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      On Wildcard I wouldn't keep Foster Personally

  30. Trovsmash
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 8 months ago

    Want to make a decision before rises, 2ft

    A. Morata & Alonso to Kola & Aguero

    B. Mee & Morata to Wimmer & Jesus (Keep Alonso) (deals with Mee's inevitable drop)

    C. Alonso, Morata & Lukaku to Kane, Kola & jesus -4.

    HELP

    1. RealSocialDads
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 8 months ago

      A